3328
Comments (218)
sorted by:
249
Jon888 249 points ago +252 / -3

We all know the left are racist AF. This just further proves it.

123
NullifyAndSecede 123 points ago +123 / -0

A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.

Thomas Sowell

60
SquiggyMcPepe 60 points ago +60 / -0

You cannot use The Ring, Frodo. It will consume you.

31
NullifyAndSecede 31 points ago +32 / -1

My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning the abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) — or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy. I would arrest anybody who uses the word State (in any sense other than the inaminate real of England and its inhabitants, a thing that has neither power, rights nor mind); and after a chance of recantation, execute them if they remained obstinate! If we could go back to personal names, it would do a lot of good.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so to refer to people … The most improper job of any many, even saints (who at any rate were at least unwilling to take it on), is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity …

There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamating factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.”

– J.R.R. Tolkien

32
johnparker 32 points ago +32 / -0

There is a reason that Hollywood left the Scouring of the Shire out of the movies.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
16
johnparker 16 points ago +16 / -0

Have you read the book? The Hobbits have to overthrow local government at the end.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-28
KernalMustard -28 points ago +5 / -33

Shame that Tolkien and Lewis were devout Catholics

27
Gurren_Laggan 27 points ago +27 / -0

It's exactly why they wrote what they wrote and felt the way the felt. Being Catholic was core to their identities. They both felt Christ is King and any organization that didn't put Him at the top was I herently against Him. Exactly why the one form of government he mentioned here was Monarchy, ordained by God to lead.

12
Powdered_Sugar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Lewis wasn't Catholic, he was Angelican. That said, he explicitly said that if the Anglicans ever ordained women he would move to the Catholic Church, so he'd be Catholic today.

Much of his philosophy and theology does align with Catholicism. I'm a devout Catholic and I love reading Lewis. He's probably my favorite religious author, even though I disagree with a few points in some of his works.

2
Whitespace 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. I know Lewis is revered among many Catholics.

2
NomadicKrow2 2 points ago +6 / -4

I'm more into God being the center of worship and Christ being his son, his messenger, and the savior of mankind. God destroyed plenty of people for worshipping things other than him. I do prefer the lens of Christianity, however, where people are treated as you'd want them to treat you. Christianity changed the face of the planet and gave value to human life.

The catholic church has done much to obscure this. They chose the books that went into the bible. They smeared Mary Mags as a prostitute when she was clearly an Apostle; they just didn't want female priests. They made church the center of the world and insisted that you, we, the normal people of the world, couldn't possibly understand the bible, which they constructed from their choice of books, so we had to go to church and pay our tithes so they could interpret it for us. My man Jesus wouldn't have been down with that, I don't think.

11
Gurren_Laggan 11 points ago +11 / -0

A lot to unpack there but most of it I believe is based on anti Catholic propaganda through the years. Yes, they did choose the books that became the Bible but they were chosen for their accuracy, consistency, and historical accuracy to adequately tell the stories of Christ and his apostles. The Church does not think that of Mary M nor does the Bible say anything of the sort. It does say that Jesus expelled demons from her and she became a devout follower. She was even the first to learn of Jesus' resurrection. The confusion comes from people assuming she is the woman why came and washed Jesus' feet with her hair but there is no indication that is true.

Personally it makes sense and is historically consistent that the priesthood is reserved for men. There are many other roles women can assume in the Church so why should that change? God is the center of all things and the Church, set up by Jesus with Peter as the first pope, is the avenue to get there on this Earth. It acts as a conduit to give people the easiest way to find Christ. Most people didn't speak Hebrew, Latin, or Greek (the languages of the Bible) and so would have no clue what the teachings were without someone to translate and guide them through it. Tithes are Biblically consistent and a form of sacrifice to give back to the Church and in turn the community.

Now I agree the leadership has gone off the rails the last few decades (novus ordo was a mistake imho) but it is the people that have misguided agendas not the Church herself. In fact we should all be flooding back to the Church demanding she be righted, not abandoning ship like Satan would want us too

4
Hiw-lir-sirith 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lewis was not Catholic.

3
KernalMustard 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm sorry. Angelican. My girlfiend is fairly devout and has a few of his non- narnia books. They are on the coffee table. I never looked to see what they discussed. I may be athiest but I'm open minded. My posts may not reflect that sometimes. I just feel that not to question what you read and told is wrong.

4
Hiw-lir-sirith 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you're willing to venture into Lewis, I think you would enjoy him. He's very intellectually stimulating even if you aren't a Christian. A few of my favorites among his nonfiction are Miracles, Mere Christianity, The Abolition of Man, and Transposition.

3
Necrovoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Screwtape Letters are worth reading - it's a great insight to how leftist self deceit works.

1
EvJohn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you say the same thing about Sir Thomas More?

13
JustBoo 13 points ago +13 / -0

if ( Search( hateTextBuffer ) == "White" || "white" ) {
. . . . allowFlag = false;
. . . ..hateTextBuffer = "Death to Whites Is Permissible!";
} else {
. . . . allowFlag = true;
. . . . hateTextBuffer += " We want Death to this Whitey 'cos We Be BLM.";
}

4
PatriotPartyRising 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol so if someone writes white in lower case don't flag it 😂

1
strawman7 1 point ago +2 / -1

Haven't they learned to train bots on the Talmud? Problem solved...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
SteelDriver 15 points ago +16 / -1

Thomas Sowell has an intellect for the ages. He and Jordan Peterson probably raise the collective IQ of the planet by a few points, just by themselves.

7
RexCollumSilvarum 7 points ago +7 / -0

I read Sowell's "The Vision of the Anointed" and one other book of his without realizing what his race was. When I learned it, and realized that he had written these great books without claiming victimization at any point at all, I gained a whole new level of respect for him.

9
analog_shitposter 9 points ago +9 / -0

The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.

Reminds me of The Law:

Men naturally rebel against the injustice of which they are victims. Thus, when plunder is organized by law for the profit of those who make the law, all the plundered classes try somehow to enter—by peaceful or revolutionary means—into the making of laws. According to their degree of enlightenment, these plundered classes may propose one of two entirely different purposes when they attempt to attain political power: Either they may wish to stop lawful plunder, or they may wish to share in it.

Woe to the nation when this latter purpose prevails among the mass victims of lawful plunder when they, in turn, seize the power to make laws!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
19
blurryface 19 points ago +19 / -0

And sexist.

And misanthropic.

10
Kamalas_a_Bitch 10 points ago +10 / -0

Blancophobic

8
NomadicKrow2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Caucphobic lmao

2
BigIronBigIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

And antisemitic.

Well, no. Maybe not that one.

13
NomadicKrow2 13 points ago +13 / -0

The left are the first ones that will racially attack someone for voting a way they don't agree. I've heard "house n----" so many times around free thinking black people. I've seen clearly liberal white people use it on twitter and FB.

Simply hating someone for their race is the most smoothbrain take. There are so many other more legitimate reasons to hate people.

8
alucard13mmfmj 8 points ago +8 / -0

Im asian.. and liberals always ask me of i watch that marvel movie la shang 10 rings or something. Im like.. dude just cause im asian doesnt mean i watch everything or like everything asian.

4
NomadicKrow2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes!

Netflix caught shit because they didn't cast an asian guy as Iron Fist. Most sane people's response was "What? Only asian people do martial arts?"

Now they've cast an asian guy as Spike Spiegel, a white guy, in the cowboy bebop live action adaption.

Anyway, I'm just angered by the double standard on all this race shit. They would never cast a white guy to play black panther, but it's cool to erase red headed characters? If Netflix did a film about the Koreans defending their businesses from the 1993 Race Rioters in LA, all the asians would be black guys and all the rioters would be whites.

2
MajorClark 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not hard to figure out a liberal by the way they act & the stupid shit they say.

12
DmMe 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gatekeepers will have you think leftist racism means you should be better than them while they attack you on racial lines in actual real world to institutionally disenfranchise you... when maybe, you could see this and think "wow, by pretending not to be racist by people who obviously are, I am being duped into accepting an obviously flawed worldview to the detriment of my race"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
86
NullifyAndSecede 86 points ago +86 / -0

The urge to save humanity is almost always a false face for the urge to rule it.

H.L. Mencken

64
TommyLasordasBallBag 64 points ago +64 / -0

Been off Facebook for a month (I know, I should have done it earlier but I had a ton of business relationships)... My overall mood has increased significantly.

36
youngfellow 36 points ago +37 / -1

Facebook needs to be abolished. Just like the FBI. Unlike the FBI however, we can help Facebook collapse by not using any cuckberg services ( and the like). There is no reforming goolag, Amazon, Facebook, the fbi, etc. these services just need to go the way of the dinosaur.

12
logan34 12 points ago +12 / -0

Facebook wont be around in a few more years. Kids dont use it AT ALL. Soon as the older generations move on it will be myspace 2.0

4
alucard13mmfmj 4 points ago +4 / -0

Facebook was over once "normies" got to it.. just like gaming and shows.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Whitespace 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's like Giulliani said of that mobster who wrote a biography that help them build their RICO case. Even a generation separated, once they know all the networks, they can reconstruct the rest.

2
logan34 2 points ago +2 / -0

Granted Facebook still owns Instagram and its tik tok knock off Reels so Zuckercuck wont be disappearing anytime soon. They could shutter Facebook but they still can control the narrative with Insta which younger generation still uses.

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

The kids are going to move to Meta. Meta is Facebook with virtual reality and also from Zuckerberg.

16
fuckfortysix 16 points ago +16 / -0

Its nice when you've been off it for a year or two. It only gets better.

15
Injustice 15 points ago +15 / -0

I stopped using it back in 2014. Didn't delete it because I do think it's a good idea but what it has become isn't. My mood improved since a month afterwards on. Never missed I do check it occasionally like two three times a year and it just reminds me how right I was to stop daily use

10
Cyer6 10 points ago +10 / -0

It became toxic and I deleted my entire account around 2018. Haven't missed it a for a second. I was also on Nextdoor for a little while and found that shit site just as toxic but even worse, people could locate you if you provided legitimate identifying information on it. This and Gab are the only social places I go and even Gab has started to wear on me. Too many reposts and not enough up-to-date information which is what I find here.

5
alucard13mmfmj 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same. I stopped using it many many years ago. I check on it 1 or 2 times a year.

4
MajorClark 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same here. I don't watch the news either, except weather on tv. It feels good!

9
goat_nebula 9 points ago +9 / -0

Been about a year and a half for me. Kept hearing about people’s Facebook drama over the past couple days with Thanksgiving and all. Just love smiling to myself, reclining the seat, taking a sip about my drink and silently tipping my glass to the old uncle or whoever who also heard but doesn’t have a fucking clue what made up bullshit they’re wasting emotion and concern on. Such peace.

4
FrankWisner 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now do Fox News.

6
TommyLasordasBallBag 6 points ago +6 / -0

I haven't had cable since 2017. I've only seen the Rittenhouse interview on Tucker since. All good there pede.

3
EvJohn 3 points ago +3 / -0

I spent about thirty nights in hotels this summer on the road. The television went on exactly zero times.

1
MajorClark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not at my house!

56
mainsoda 56 points ago +56 / -0

90% of all hate speech is against white people?! I knew it was bad, but not that bad.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
30
18-to-life 30 points ago +30 / -0

Let me distill it down: The Left doesn’t consider the phrase, “Die whitie!” to be hate speech, so they say it an awful lot, and the algorithms pick it up and remove it.

Of course, they frame it a different way: that the algorithm is racist for removing predominantly black peoples posts.

14
Klown_Schwab 14 points ago +14 / -0

Remember when Google's image recognition algorithm kept confusing black people with apes?

Or Amazon's resume sorting algorithm decided to filter out women's resumes and only hire men?

lmao

4
Election_Quotes 4 points ago +4 / -0

When Microsoft’s Taylor Swift bot became a Nazi and wished Hitler a happy birthday

When the CCP’s own AI chatbot started criticising communism

Just two more of my favourites

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did it filter out women by sex or discriminate on them due to experience?

2
Klown_Schwab 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure about the details.

I'm ssuming it found some undesirable pattern that was common to most female applicants and just decided to filter all of them out for efficiency, unaware of the PC rules it was breaking

10
AbrahamLincoln 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hell, take a look at any of the fake news, WaPo, NYT, etc. 100% of their hate is directed at white people.

7
BigIronBigIron 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who owns these media outlets?

5
MajorClark 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hollywood and the elites. Pelosi, Oprah, Obama's & cucked Hollywood. Jewish Supremacist's own CNN, MSNBC, ABC, MSN, CBS, etc. & everybody knows these bad Jews hate & feel entitled to oppress white people. Hitler thought the same way.

8
TheImpossible1 8 points ago +8 / -0

White people and men

This article buries the lead pretty hard.

How much of that 90% was women doing their "kill all men" bit?

7
OIKOBOIKO 7 points ago +7 / -0

white people and men

1
MajorClark 1 point ago +1 / -0

and cops

50
muy_libre 50 points ago +50 / -0

I have an idea... how about stop policing speech entirely? Maybe we could try this old-fashioned thing called “free speech”

63
Brobold 63 points ago +63 / -0

Leftist ideas can't exist without censorship.

19
EdmondDantesDog 19 points ago +19 / -0

This Pede gets it

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
MajorClark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please run for gov. of Illinois.

38
deleted 38 points ago +39 / -1
3
JKillen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent post fren

5
MajorClark 5 points ago +5 / -0

FB failed when it got into politics. Pelosi owns a big portion of Facebook and the fake news.

25
ShadowDocket 25 points ago +25 / -0

They were never "hiding" their contempt for you White folks!

Why do you idiots keep lying to yourselves like they were ever playing fair? White folks are so ingrained to "follow the rules" that even when they see they're the only one still following those damn "rules" ... they tuck their heads and keep following the damn "rules", even to their own demise.

"Rules" are made by the strong to keep the weak in place. Wake up!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
25
GodKingHarambe 25 points ago +25 / -0

There was an entire Twitter hashtag yesterday about "White Women Stepping Out of Line"

Some white girl in the UK couldn't understand why black folk were celebrating Thanksgiving cuz "muh colonialism" and "muh slavery" and "muh indigenous"

11
Headybro420 11 points ago +11 / -0

Any links. Black people must be getting sick of white women “allys”

2
GodKingHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was looking for a Twitchy, but didn't find one. Here's a lower-grade

https://meaww.com/white-women-overstepping-influencer-slammed-for-berating-blacks-celebrating-thanksgiving

8
SharingZebraSTDs 8 points ago +8 / -0

Its funny how it’s always women if spouting this shit and never men.

10
Keiichi81 10 points ago +10 / -0

Let's not downplay the role of soyboys and simps in the libpocalypse.

9
TheImpossible1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank God this site doesn't have "misogyny" rules like the honeypot Parler.

It is always women, and I guarantee the vast majority of that 90% removed is women against men.

7
PatriotPartyRising 7 points ago +7 / -0

as much I HATE taliban and think they are trash they were so right not to let women get any positions in government. How wise they were! Once you start down that path they will lead you to the end of civilization. Women got the right to vote in 1920's it took barely 100yrs to bring our culture into decline

6
TheImpossible1 6 points ago +6 / -0

The Taliban are not good people. Having said that, our own leaders sent young men to die in the desert for 20 years because women going to college to learn to hate the men that allowed them to was more important.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
America1stAndOnly 1 point ago +1 / -0

God warned us right from the start that to follow a woman is to be led to ruin.

2
Pearls_Swine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh God, there's plenty of men spouting this, and they always look exactly how you'd expect them to look, unfuckable.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
14
Zskills 14 points ago +14 / -0

To be fair, i don't give a shit what people say about me. Hoes mad. Sounds to me like white men just aren't as thin skinned as other demographics.

Muh white fragility. Lmfao.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
Gwoz8881 16 points ago +17 / -1

Blacks are the most racist people I have ever met. There is no such thing as reverse racism. It’s just racism. Bring everyone up instead of bring people down to the lowest level of dindus

14
logan34 14 points ago +14 / -0

Chinese are actually the most racist

8
PatriotPartyRising 8 points ago +8 / -0

yup, it's very nice there, even in japan it's absolutely amazing you can just walk down the streets and not see a single thug dindu

even in Dubai it's amazing because there's hardly any of them

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Pearls_Swine 2 points ago +2 / -0

I visited Japan twice before Covid, and both times I saw 1-2 joggers there. Both times they were soliciting sex workers to tourists. The second time, one of the black men (with an African accent) asked my boyfriend if he likes to get his dick sucked, obviously trying to sell him a dick sucking whore.

So even when they do allow it (which is rare), they trash up the place.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
MajorClark 3 points ago +3 / -0

I disagree! The Chinese don't want lunatic's out rioting with "Defund the Police" & "Burn Loot & Murder." So they keep them out! That's one thing China does right.

13
FromSethWithLove 13 points ago +13 / -0

Even the reporting is through the lense of "oh no, muh poor black people!"

9
Keiichi81 9 points ago +9 / -0

"90% of the hate speech being removed by our race-blind AI is by minorities targeted at white people. Does this mean that minorities are actually the most racist and white people are actually the most victimized? No, the AI must just be racist. We'll just reprogram it so it doesn't remove anti-white hate speech anymore. Let the narrative resume!"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at that bottom-left paragraph: proof that hatred for Facebook's pets is over-reported compared to a neutral race/sex-blind algorithm.

Yet this information is presented so as to imply that the algorithm is wrong, not the over-reporting users.

12
n0ne0ther 12 points ago +12 / -0

When the AI doesn't take into account taboo truths... Oops!

7
Zskills 7 points ago +7 / -0

AI is consistently based.

Listen to this hysterical summary of AI.

https://youtu.be/MYm9ktd9Gvg

11
magafren 11 points ago +11 / -0

So the algo is programmed to be race blind.

Black people are getting flagged the most by FAR for hate speech

AI is reprogrammed for wrong think

Honk fucking Honk

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
Pelosi_Halitosis 7 points ago +7 / -0

I got my features limited on Twatter last week for sarcastically saying. Since the Christmas Massacre was the result of white supremacists, all white people need to die. I thought for sure that would fly in leftoidland.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Taliesin 2 points ago +2 / -0

You shouldn't have mentioned Christmas, BIGOT!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +17 / -11
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +11 / -5
-1
ReasonableMan00 -1 points ago +6 / -7

yes fight racism with more racism

looks like youre the real monkey

3
Klown_Schwab 3 points ago +3 / -0

Check out the book "A Troublesome Inheritance" by Nicholas Wade.

There's increasing evidence that average IQ and even behavioral characteristics are hereditary and distributed along racial lines.

Of course it's on a curve and the curves overlap. A black person on the high end of the black IQ curve is gonna be smarter that a white person on the low end of the white IQ curve. It's not justification to prejudge an individual.

But when talking about unequal outcomes between groups... might be that's just how it is. Not much can be done about it.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-3
jebbush123 -3 points ago +8 / -11

Learn how to spell first, retard.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
AJoeDD 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not the first AI where this happened. Same story a year ago.

It happened cuz the AI coding and AI research has been influenced by wHIIITtE supremes

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Keiichi81 4 points ago +4 / -0

"We here at Facebook don't consider hate speech directed at whites and men to be as serious as hate speech directed at other groups, even though the former makes up 90% of all hate speech online, so we'll allow it to be posted. Don't you dare say anything derogatory about a tranny though or we'll automatically delete your account!"

Glad we could clear that up.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
acasper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Math is Based.

4
Disparity 4 points ago +4 / -0

lmaoo, libs are retarded

3
potacarry 3 points ago +3 / -0

The algorithm didn't distinguish among the targets of hate speech. Right, it was supposed to be "race-blind".

3
Wexit-Delecto 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm so glad this diversity sham is unravelling. We are supposed to live apart.

3
Kerra_Holt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jiggerboos are racist to whites?! WHO KNEW?! What a fucking shock!

1
CynicalTwit22 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jussie Smollett, is that you???

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Drud14 3 points ago +4 / -1

Reminder: the ADL (an anti-white hate group) is Facebook’s primary consultant for hate speech.

3
Kholland65 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve always said, black people are by far the most racist group of people. It’s been proven time and time again. This is just another example.

3
AbrahamLincoln 3 points ago +3 / -0

Facebook hates whites, men and Americans. Which was clear to everyone even before their AI pointed it out.

3
SoldierofKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Since the algorithm can be manipulated, wouldn't it be hilarious to tweak the algorithm to spotlight and promote speech that sounds like 4chan?

3
MLGS 3 points ago +3 / -0

White people letting them get away with "oh that's just how they talk hun :)"

3
MuricaQThroatpuncher 3 points ago +3 / -0

nuke silicon valley

3
Sylvester1212 3 points ago +3 / -0

Neveret facts get in the way of the narrative.

3
RachetQueen2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. I got a strike for calling a 90 Day Fiance cast member in a private group that is called Savage a freaking skank.

3
NotInFormation 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's a "facebook" and why would anyone use such a biased horrible thing? :D

3
MuslimMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

In other words it works perfectly.

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +6 / -3

I got insta-banned for saying Lauren Southern was a stupid ho. Went against bullying policy. How the fuck is it bullying when the person I’m talking about has zero chance of seeing it? Dumb.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck the OnlyFans defending POS.

1
Axiom502 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're gay

3
mykillk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn they really are fully out of the closet now. That’s as blatant as it gets. Hating whitey and men is ok.

3
ANCsemi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Real life has hit Bee levels of satire.

2
C_Jonesy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are they capitalizing “White”? Fucking idiots.

2
5DPancake 2 points ago +2 / -0

13% of the population 90% of the hate speech.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
NotAHandshake 2 points ago +2 / -0

How the fuck can something be "the most" racist if we're all equal and shit? Funny to see them admit more and more blatantly they're trying to make whites a sub-race.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
slimcoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN TRUTH

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's a shame so many people still use Facebook and old socialist social media.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
geocitiesuser 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's been difficult but I am slowly unplugging from big tech as much as possible. When you're a software developer this is exceedingly difficult. I'm expected to know how facebook apis, google apis, amazon apis, etc, all work. But these companies are literally trying to destroy our lives.

2
Trumpdidit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can we just stop this prolonging the inevitable, and start the civil war already.

2
Chad_Dudebroski 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel like i should sue fagbook for this

2
Reiisbestgirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ai is based

2
Dirk_Diggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man, they really are trying to get that Roko’s Basilisk off the ground.

2
ConcernedFrenchFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will link the Alfred quote from Batman Vs superman to describe the danger of all this : Tell me it doesn't give you chills