1753
Comments (136)
sorted by:
95
Groundpounder 95 points ago +95 / -0

It’s sad that simple observations is all it takes to get some people angry

71
deleted 71 points ago +71 / -0
24
ForsakenForeskin 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yes

23
Bullet_Tooth_Tony 23 points ago +23 / -0

Because every single person who goes out with a mask on and has taken a shot forced by someone else know that he is calling them weak without directly calling them weak. They subconsciously know they are weak and it infuriates them. They cannot go back undo things and even if given the chance they will not. Because uncontrolled change scares them. They are hopeless.

53
MAGA1775 53 points ago +54 / -1

I can't wait for the "hard times."

Its going to last our entire lives, at least 20-50 years

The Baby Boomers got lucky, they got to live in the best times. The future is going to be bleak. But its up to us to save it.

43
CanadianFren 43 points ago +43 / -0

Yeah the boomers were born right after the war so they grew up in peak civilization created by the strongest of men.

23
20KAG20 23 points ago +25 / -2

And created the weak men. Fuck boomers

15
CanadianFren 15 points ago +15 / -0

Nah the boomers created the conditions that brought us the weak men. Their tolerance/apathy was what allowed communists to take over and start indoctrinating Gen X,Y, and Z into wokism.

10
MehNahMehNah 10 points ago +10 / -0

i.e. Happy Days -> That 70's Show

9
russianbot4673 9 points ago +9 / -0

oh they did? they 'created the conditions' huh? did they now?

and how'd they do that? was it by electing guys like woodrow wilson and FDR? FDR who got elected what was it, 4 times? was that boomers who put a physically frail socialist in office 4 times in a row?

oh wait no, no, it was the so called great generation. the same one that went to WW2. who did that. awesome. it all makes sense. somehow the boomers manipulated the great stronk men who came before them, i suppose from inside the womb or from psychic mindwaves from the future, into electing pieces of communist garbage who wanted to put us on the path to being a fucked up welfare state. it all makes sense!

4
_Eric_Ciaramella_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah ots really Gen X who fucked our children over with indoctrination. Boomers weren't commies. Gen X pushed Anti-amerocan Marxism onto us

1
TheOneWhoKnocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gen X has their share of commies, no doubt, but the mass acceptance of Leftism can be traced directly to the 60s and all the free love hippies. Some of those boomer commie queers are STILL in academia, brainwashing the shit out of people.

3
20KAG20 3 points ago +3 / -0

The boomers are still running this country today?

5
Mark4-39 5 points ago +5 / -0

What's the average age of congress?

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Between 57 to 62 years old. So Baby Boomers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
russianbot4673 5 points ago +6 / -1

this kind of thinking is so stupid.

woodrow wilson and FDR both laid major, major groundwork for the shit we got today. and they were elected by the supposedly 'great generation' of 'strong men' who, i suppose, wanted a welfare state? mother of fuck do you retards even think about the shit you're saying when you blame everything on 'boomers'?

nah, just parroting the million other people who helped create a trend around it. trends are fun!

3
MerlynTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

almost like all generations of people have stupid people.

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah. for some reason a bunch of the stupid people in this generation want to blame everything on 'boomers'

probably, and i'm being dead serious, because they think it's fun to type out 'boomers'

'boomers' sounds funny. which makes it easier and more likely to trend. sad fact. people's psychology really is that stupid and basic.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not so black and white.

Also the theme is "good times vs hard times"

Has nothing to do with socialism, communism, capitalism, welfare, etc.

Not sure why you're getting so defensive about Baby Boomers, but then do the same thing and blame the generation prior. As if Baby Boomers dindu nuffin.

The strong men during WW2 and right before created the "good times" which was the 1950s to 1990s. Those good times bred soft men. 2000-2020 (the tail end of the good times) gave rise to SJWerism, safe spaces, wokeness.....basically "peak weakness."

We are now about to enter the hard times, which will last anywhere from 20-50 years and breed strong men again.

It has nothing to do with who is to blame, its a natural cycle of civilizations and has happened all over the world in history.

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +3 / -0

i pointed out that the previous generation elected FDR 4 times. the 'strong men' elected a physically frail socialist 4 times.

guess you can't understand that.

0
u53rnam3 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Greatest Generation did not elect FDR. Their parents did. The Greatest Generation were children when FDR was first elected. People blame the Baby Boomers because of the societal decay from things such as the Sexual Revolution and feminism. Sadly, most of that was a result of decisions made by generations before them.

-1
DoritoBlizzardPence -1 points ago +2 / -3

And then 90% of millennials are stupid enougj to vote socialost

1
20KAG20 1 point ago +2 / -1

Maybe but millennials were raised weak by helicopter parents brought up by boomers. I know this because I am a millennial and witnessed it first hand.

8
Spawnlingman 8 points ago +8 / -0

My brother in law is 57. Just had all the good times. And is now saying hes too old to go to protests and expect to do anything about all of this. But he still plays on his old farts softball team.

4
mobgrazer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. I just recently got an email from a boomer uncle who has ridden the demographic wave. He was an auto mechanic who built up a small shop in a town of 2000 people that saw a constant flow of fleeing Californian boomers. He sold it 25 yrs ago, put all the money in the market, and has spent the last 25 years continually recreating. He has no worry that the market is massively overvalued, the country is bankrupt, the government is becoming authoritarian, and that the plandemic is a hoax. Instead he sends me "funny" boomer memes, runs around visiting brew pubs with other boomers, spends 3 months each winter at their beach house in Mexico and his primary concern seems to be that he should be "making" more money in the stock market.

1
WowbaggerTIP 1 point ago +1 / -0

The war(s) eliminated the strongest of men, which explains a lot of why we're here now.

5
President_Elect_Pepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m not saving shit for them.

I don’t know what kind of disassembling of society is about to take place. But I can guarantee that those selfish fucks get nothing from me.

Maybe I’ll give them a raft to set them off to sea on if they are lucky.

1
RegularAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

Teach your children to love freedom. I bought my son a .22 rifle and he's not even old enough to walk yet.

3
Original_Dankster 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're typically 20 year cycles - generations. See Strauss-Howe generational theory.

6
MAGA1775 6 points ago +6 / -0

Typically, but not always.

I'd consider the "good times" in America to be from the 1950s to 1990s. Which would be 50 years of "good times," but that may be subjective.

Seems like America really started going downhill in the early 2000s which kicked off the generation of weak men. That would be around a 20 year phase when measuring to today.

We are now on the cusp between "weak men" and "hard times." Probably just starting the "hard times" phase. Could be many factors that determine how long it lasts. Hopefully its only 20 years.

2
downvotethechristian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe we're in the "weak men" phase. The actual expression says "weak men create hard times." So there's a bit of a lag between the men and the times. Weak men can live in good times for quite a while, but will eventually be the ones to create hard times for their generation and the next.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its moreso a grid with 4 segments as shown in the OP and it moves clockwise around the grid:

The strong men generation was prior to the 50s (WW2 and earlier)

They created the good times which was the 50s to 90s

A long era of good times eventually created weak men, which reached critical mass between 2000-2020

We are now witnessing the results of that with the "hard times" which are just starting. We are no longer in good times....rapid inflation starting to take off, COVID hysteria, supply chain destruction and shortages, vaccine mandates, small businesses being decimated, the Great Reset, destruction of the middle class, hordes of third world migrants walking over the border and being handed $450,000, a rapidly growing welfare/dependent class, etc.

The good times are over.

1
paperairplanes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm hoping that the hard times are shorter this time because we do have a greater grass roots movement - despite censorship, social media and online platforms are able to spread the truth faster, we can see videos of protesters, we can read published papers on myocarditis from the Vaccines, etc.

Maybe not everyone is there yet, but it's surely got to be a faster spread of truth than back in the lead up to the Nazis and the Bolsheviks.

1
mobgrazer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. The global dollar monetary system is ending. The US is bankrupt. The financial system is a massive bubble. We don't produce enough of what we need, what we do produce depends on imported components. We've lost the tradesman and infrastructure to make what we need.

What will millions of people in the US do when their government benefits won't buy anything? Are they going to go back to trade school or are they going to loot and burn?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
jhewish 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hes a little off. I am heavily into this stuff and we are on an ascending arc.

We are on the tail end of the upper left square.

Specifically the right side of the upper left going into top right square.

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd personally put us more around the center all the way to the left.

The strong men generation was prior to the 50s (WW2 and earlier)

They created the good times which was the 50s to 90s

A long era of good times eventually created weak men, which reached critical mass between 2000-2020. This is when the rise of "wokeness", "safe spaces", political correctness and social justice warriors appeared and got worse and worse the closer we got to 2020. But times were still comfortable during this period. Still relatively easy to live a cozy life.

We are now witnessing the results of critical mass "weak men" with the "hard times" which are just starting.

We are no longer in good times....rapid inflation starting to take off, COVID hysteria, supply chain destruction and shortages, vaccine mandates, small businesses being decimated, the Great Reset, destruction of the middle class, hordes of third world migrants walking over the border, a rapidly growing welfare/dependent class, etc.

The good times have just ended. It doesn't make sense that we are just coming out of the hard times. We haven't truly witnessed what hard times actually look like yet. Its going to get A LOT worse before it gets better.

3
jhewish 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are assuming the hard times are going to be just as impactful as they were the last time around.

I do not think that will be the case with the exposure on these people and the overall awareness of the public.

We without question have bottomed out spiritually and can only ascend from here.

3
MAGA1775 3 points ago +3 / -0

Usually hard times contain an economic impact which we haven't seen yet, but are just starting to see.

I also don't see how we are anywhere close to the tail-end of the "strong men" period about to go into good times like you said.

We couldn't even handle the Jan 6th protestors and had to disavow them. Now imagine what the actual last "strong men" generation would have done in our situation. Sure, there's some awareness of the issues. But that doesn't really indicate a generation of "strong men." We also tend to live on an echo chamber on here, and are still a minority in America.

I guess its relatively subjective, but that's my personal opinion. We haven't experienced real hardship yet but are about to.

Those hard times will create the strong men.

3
jhewish 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd put us at the beginning of the top right.

The strong men are rising in response to the degeneracy in society peaking.

A strong hand stops all of the nonsense we are dealing with which is propagated by cowards who fold once they are told NO

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes more sense to put us into the hard times grid at least. Or at least bordering strong men and hard times at minimum if we are completely disregarding any economic hardship. We just experienced the rise of "wokeness", SJWerism, safe spaces, feminism and CRT is still being pushed. All of those things are still mainstream in American society.

This stuff wouldn't be happening mid-way through the strong men period.

As mentioned, we tend to live in an echo chamber on this site and this site is not reflective of average American society or average Americans.

There's still quite a ways to go as far as developing a society of strong men. Currently strong men control 0% of the institutions in the country.

An indicator that we are half-way through the "strong men" phase would be if strong men actually controlled 50% of society. But we don't yet.

30
MSHEE-KHAA-YAA 30 points ago +31 / -1

Hinduism? Just wait until he reads Revalation!

-25
Emperorvoid -25 points ago +13 / -38

Fairy Tales are awesome!

13
RuleoVicus 13 points ago +19 / -6

Yet faggots like you believe in aliens...

13
Ponzo [S] 13 points ago +21 / -8

Pretty bold to claim to be alone in the universe considering the size of it.

2
Parhelion12 2 points ago +7 / -5

Such a view minimizes God's design and plan for His creation.

7
Ponzo [S] 7 points ago +12 / -5

Good thing that this isn't a religious forum then.

-2
DoritoBlizzardPence -2 points ago +1 / -3

Fuck off back to the democrwta atheist filth. You atheists are who created communusm and push lgbt onto kids

0
mtmason21 0 points ago +1 / -1

No one in this thread denied the existence of God. Stop acting like a liberal and attacking anyone who doesn't prescribe to your exact ideology.

-2
Ponzo [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Im sure the church diddled kids long before communism even existed.

1
EvJohn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why?

Seems to me it's more minimizing to God to have you not allow him to create other planets and other life.

I might not know much (and I don't), but I'm pretty sure that I'll never have enough hubris to say what God did or did not do - nor what He can or cannot do.

YMMV, of course...

-1
Android17 -1 points ago +5 / -6

religion are the o.g sjws they only on this side cause the sjw stole their grift

1
DoritoBlizzardPence 1 point ago +3 / -2

Nah, atheists are the origjnal sjw as atheista founded communism and socjus and nlm

0
Truinondupressure 0 points ago +3 / -3

They are sjw classic. I detest both religious and socialist zealots.

1
Emperorvoid 1 point ago +2 / -1

THIS!!!

0
DoritoBlizzardPence 0 points ago +3 / -3

Wrong, atheists are sjw classic. You athiest filth are responsible for marxism, socjus, blm, illegal alien open borders, and lgbt/trans indoctrinatiom for kids.

3
Goobillypoo 3 points ago +9 / -6

Who said God made only us?

6
Parhelion12 6 points ago +9 / -3

God

4
ProphetOfKek 4 points ago +5 / -1

I’m not sure that claim is anywhere in the Bible. I don’t think it addresses it at all.

3
Mark4-39 3 points ago +3 / -0

God made everything. Humans aren't everything. Everything may or may not include aliens. Aliens may or may not be a synonym for demon.

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

why'd he make us in a galaxy with billions of stars, and a universe with billions of visible galaxies, but none of those other stars have anything living on them? seems kind of like a weird waste of time, doesn't it? i mean why create literally trillions of other worlds but no other life? just so we have a pretty night sky to look at? could've created that a lot of other ways besides making giant balls of gas that are millions or billions of light years away. i mean why make a star or a planet billions and billions of miles away if we're the only things that matter?

0
Emperorvoid 0 points ago +1 / -1

Billion? Over 100 Billion. As for Galaxies, there are an estimated over 100 Billion of those too.

Numbers wise, you are looking over 100,000,000,000 Galaxies, with over 100,000,000 star systems, with an average of 2.5 Planets per star system.

That makes us 1 planet out of a low estimate of 25,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Anyone thinking we are alone, just isn't very well educated nor intelligent. I got cavemen in here calling me stupid.

DUNNING-KRUEGER!

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

ok. but the weird thing is i'm scanning my post and nowhere did i ever say 'billion'. instead, what i said, multiple times, was 'billions'. plural. which covers anything over 1 billion.

but yeah i know, it's a really big fuck ton of probable planets out there

i don't really like the 'isn't very well educated' statement, i mean the current state of our education systems is a joke and i don't think it's fair to condemn people who maybe don't trust this shit anyway. ultimately it doesn't really matter because yeah there are trillions of stars but we can't go to any of them. probably ever. and a lot of people have good healthy reasons for distrusting any and all 'authorities' right now.

0
MAGA_Centurion 0 points ago +1 / -1

sauce?

2
MrAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ur a fag

0
Emperorvoid 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh you are a sharp one aren't you.

-1
DoritoBlizzardPence -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ypu mean the atheist classic of communism?

1
Emperorvoid 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not sure exactly what you are trying to Smurf here atm, but one, I am not Athiest, I do think it is probable that there is something, however I don't claim to know what that is, let alone tell others some bullshit highly edited story that has roots not only through Judaism, but going back as far as old tales from Sumer. I've spent my time educating myself. What you consider Canon to your belief story structure I call bullshit on as I have seen the drafts, that came a long fucking time ago before your story.

As for Communism, if the dead could speak, their anger and hunger would silence the Libs, but the Libs are dumb, and the dead don't speak. Few learn from history... And the Gulag Archipelago is too vast in pages for the majority to have any fucking clue about how bad that shit is.

Atheism has its own smug bullshit, and like any other belief system, it can be taken to the extreme and become a weapon.

Which is why I abhor group think, and I am always willing to play the devils advocate with anyone, myself most included.

25
canadianhere 25 points ago +25 / -0

I would argue we're already at the beginning of hard times.

17
FlyinHeadlock 17 points ago +17 / -0

We would be much farther along on hard times but they keep propping up the market. It should have failed several times already. Won't matter. Same results just takes a little longer. The hard times don't even have to be that bad with some forward planning but most do not do that so yes it will be extremely hard for them.

7
BigIronBigIron 7 points ago +7 / -0

The real hard times aren't scheduled until the last Boomer kicks the bucket. "After us, the flood."

11
nakedjay 11 points ago +11 / -0

We are experiencing authoritarianism from the left right now. Trying to force mandates without congressional approval. Biden's handlers are trying to do whatever they can get away with and see what sticks. Even if courts overturn their BS, they know they can get away with it for months.

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

You would be wrong.

1
MAGA_Centurion 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not even fucking close.

17
Kelevra 17 points ago +17 / -0

There's only one problem for this chart / idea. It doesn't account for a secret global kabal of kid fuckers with unlimited resources pushing everything and everyone to the brink.

2
sanitaryshaver 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what moves us from bottom right to top left.

1
Couchprofessor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it actually is because historically that's always been the situation. It's worked into the equation.

11
YT45 11 points ago +11 / -0

They’re really hating the fact that he relates it to one of their holy “brown people” religions instead of Christianity. He locked them into a feedback loop, because it’s automatically racist to criticize anything that comes from a “brown people” religion. Now they’re trying to divide by zero.

8
jsphere256 8 points ago +8 / -0

Literally a swastika, how dare you

2
Mark4-39 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fits with the hindu nonsense right?

7
Emperorvoid 7 points ago +8 / -1

Damn if that isn't accurate as fuck!

6
Mpetey123 6 points ago +10 / -4

Does the flying spaghetti monster know Rogan is subscribing to Hinduism philosophy

5
Dialectic 5 points ago +8 / -3

Hinduism is fake and gay

2
Be_Banned 2 points ago +3 / -1

if isinstance(x, religion): return "fake and gay."

1
Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Atheism is fake and gay

-5
KernalMustard -5 points ago +4 / -9

Funny, how the Abrahamic religions are sooooo tolerant of other religions. I mean they tried to stamp out "Pagan" religions where ever they moved in a place

15
ProphetOfKek 15 points ago +15 / -0

Those pagan religions were burning children in fires.

-2
KernalMustard -2 points ago +1 / -3

Well, they didn't know it was evil until other people came along and told them it was wrong. Sound familier?

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea what point you are making.

1
KernalMustard 1 point ago +2 / -1

In a bubble these people didn't know what they were doing was wrong till Christians came along and told them so. The Christians then tried to convert them. See now days if someone believes in something not God they are evil. It hasnt changed. No matter how different that religion is say Hinduism it's looked like it's wrong. Be tolerant of others and beliefs. I am, some here might mistake me for putting down your religion, that's not the case. Me, I'm athiest because of past events in my life when I begun to question the meaning of things. A loss so large I'm still not over it. I asked God for help, and never got a feeling that was ever answered. I lost my faith you can say. I questioned all of Christianitys history and what has been done in its name, some of the very things the pagans did Christanity did also

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

So I didnt respond right away, because what you wrote rattled me in my spirit, not specifically the words. I actually felt a bit of your pain in my spirit, which stunned me, and I didnt know how to respond. This sort of thing doesn’t happen to me too often, so I prayed about it and waited.

I think before dealing with the plights of nations and weighty problems of the intellect, dealing with our own wounds first is what is necessary. No intellectual understanding will ever really heal that type of pain.

I think the Lord Himself will be the only thing that will be sufficient for this.

I was given two passages of scripture for you to look at.

One is the parable of the widow and the unjust judge in Luke 18:1-8. The persistence of the widow was key. The argument is that the if even an unjust judge will grant a petition after persistent asking, how much more will a good God?

The other was Jacob wrestling the angel in Genesis 32:22-31. Jacob does not let go until the angel blesses him. Persistence again, no matter what. But I’d point out that even though Jacob was wrestling with God in the since of wrestling against him, yet it was God who gave him the strength to do so and overcome.

I don’t know the meat of your pain or the details of your struggle. I felt a piece of it in the spiritual realm, and honestly it rattled me, which is difficult to do. I only know that only the Lord is sufficient to heal that wound, and I am encouraging you to pursue with all of what you are.

Will be praying for you.

-1
DoritoBlizzardPence -1 points ago +1 / -2

Hello biden

3
Mark4-39 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why tolerate lies?

1
MrAmerica 1 point ago +3 / -2

Ur a fag

-1
KernalMustard -1 points ago +1 / -2

Takes one to know one

0
DoritoBlizzardPence 0 points ago +3 / -3

Pagans were child-raplsts, just like your democrat party.

JudeoChristianity is what the US and constitution were built on

0
KernalMustard 0 points ago +1 / -1

A portion were Deists actually. Creator not God

4
Gildoom 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's in the Bible too, used to be in History books, but can't have that, gotta keep the cycle going! Like Lance Armstrong in the portajohn shootin up some roids, gotta keep that cycle going bruh!

3
CanadianFren 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are we in the hard times yet? I have a feeling we're only just beginning to enter that phase as our civilizations start to break down. Maybe our grandchildren will be the strong men created by hard times.

1
Mark4-39 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're solidly in the weak men phase. As time and weaker men increase, we'll shift further left into the hard times phase. But acceleration factors are pushing harder than normal, so we may see hard times sooner. Rome will fall again. And again. And again...

3
EnoughGunControl 3 points ago +4 / -1

We are the strong men ideology.

2
NPC01001101010000010 2 points ago +2 / -0

Missing from the graph is the fall of great civilizations usually happens between bottom left and top left. See Rome.

2
Goobillypoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Women aren't even factored in. I love it!

5
AmericanScholar373 5 points ago +5 / -0

Weak men might as well be considered women for all intents and purposes

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

i'll agree we have plenty of weak men but this idea that it's part of some hindu cycle that a bunch of people in india were smart enough to see, but nobody else was? nah i'll pass on that bs. i wouldn't even call it a cycle. the landscape of history is too complex. you have nations invading other nations, so you can't really pick a nation and look at its 'cycles', because none of them are isolated. they're always fucking with each other, and that alone is enough to cause 'hard times'.

the idea would be if you have one self contained nation and could observe its 'cycles', but for the most part you can't. there are no self contained and isolated nations. obviously complacency is a thing. but there's so much more to it than that. elites have other means of attaining power, such as secrecy, and they aren't all contingent of the populace being complacent because of 'mah good times' or whatever.

this thing joe rogan is saying about the cycles, it's the equivalent of those feel good inspirational facebook quotes. or of the guy who gets high on weed and goes 'woa, like what if we're all like, a bunch of atoms in some big guy's fingernail' or whatever. it sounds clever, but it isn't.

i do agree that libertarianism is the path to ruin though. a bit surprised joe would think so. or maybe he just didn't notice that part of the graph?

2
logical 2 points ago +2 / -0

The word “man” or “men” does not refer to a single liberal.

2
Shezestriakis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hinduism isn't the only place it's been predicted. Anyone who pays attention to history will see a repeating pattern.

1
j2daeww 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very cool and I agree

1
Dontdoxxxmeplease 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very interesting read about Kali Yuga.

1
mytummyhurts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know about Cali yoga, but this chart seems pretty accurate.

1
True-Grit 1 point ago +2 / -1

At what point in known history has the human population had "good times"? It's been wars and rumors of wars since Cain slew Abel. Sure there are moments of good times just like a moment of every other category listed here. There will always be Hard Times, Strong Men, Good Times, and Weak Men continually till HE returns.

4
20KAG20 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Good times” are when people are doing so well they can find things to bitch about that have nothing to do with survival.

1
MerlynTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone else find Rogan's comment a bit too deterministic?

1
FromSethWithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women are people, but women have never been and never will be, men

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think the bottom left exists.

Those are lefty hippies who want handouts but no taxation.

Democrats are Top Left

Republicans are Top Right

MAGA is Bottom Right.

1
here_holdmybeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

"In a time of weak men, be a strong man" - probably someone at some point in history

1
Wintergreen 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of people are saying that the 'Good Times' was from the 1950s-1990s, to which I would point out that the late 60s-early 80s was very turbulent and had several rough economic events. 'Good Times' did air in the 70s though...

On a more serious note, it is difficult to determine what lies ahead for us because technology keeps changing so rapidly. Cryptocurrency, AI, robotics, bio-engineering are progressing so quickly now it is difficult to say where we will be in ten years. For example, it's possible that the technology moves so fast that it allows men to become even WEAKER and not see any major negative consequence.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
acidburn 1 point ago +1 / -0

how dare he use his horse sense to think logically, knowing the left will be triggered

damn, i already did horse puns a few min ago

1
FreeNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would modify it a bit. Good times leads to envy by the weak who demand authoritarians destroy or chain the strong leading to collapse...which is reversed later by the strong...because they are the only ones to save it.

0
KrellKrypto 0 points ago +4 / -4

Hinduism is based

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-6
deleted -6 points ago +4 / -10
6
CanadianFren 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its only the very beginning of the hard times category. The people who will live long enough to see good times are a generation or two away from being born.

3
ApesInControl 3 points ago +3 / -0

ah man fuck that.

2
CDXX 2 points ago +4 / -2

Oh look, the comment I knew would be here. Let me guess…Rogan is a faggot bc he had Bernie Sanders on his show? Get some new material.

1
Goobillypoo 1 point ago +2 / -1

These hard times of free money and infinite technology. Yea. It's rough out here.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1