2342
Comments (192)
sorted by:
145
deleted 145 points ago +145 / -0
43
deleted 43 points ago +43 / -0
26
DoozerChuck 26 points ago +26 / -0

!Science

15
Fundadores 15 points ago +15 / -0

LOL, they were putting the bang in the wrong spot the whole time! Nice fix.

27
AHonkTooFar 27 points ago +27 / -0

'How can you make your child’s Covid-19 vaccination hurt less?' is the first link I see on that Vicky Forster's profile. Demons.

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
-9
Litterboxer1 -9 points ago +6 / -15

Rent free

2
peterstrzoked 2 points ago +4 / -2

Rent free

You’re a perfect match for each other

-10
Litterboxer1 -10 points ago +1 / -11

Make sense peasant.

1
peterstrzoked 1 point ago +3 / -2

The semites live rent free in the antisemite’s head, while the antisemites live rent free in the semite’s (your) head.

Lol, idiots

-5
Litterboxer1 -5 points ago +0 / -5

Uh, you obviously don't know what that term means. I'm not just accusing random people of being an anti-semite, I'm pointing them out based on their own comments.

These storm fags literally just call every journalist or person whose name ends in -berg a Jew, without actually even knowing if they are or not, hence the rent-free. Get on my level peasant.

1
peterstrzoked 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you go around looking for “stormfags” to call out, but someone is paying you to do it, so it’s not rent free?

Is that what you are saying, retard?

14
realPhantomFuck 14 points ago +15 / -1

What a faggot

2
Flipakademsarepedos 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yet they said this was a conspiracy theory at first!!!

2
pix4dix 2 points ago +2 / -0

thread is pure gold

74
sustainable_saltmine 74 points ago +75 / -1

a "tiny bit" in one person could mean nothing, in someone else, a slow chain reaction that means cancer eventually. Viruses don't "change your DNA" they change the DNA of only the cells they infect for the purposes of reproduction. They do not mutate whole people.

STOP FUCKING WITH DNA!

32
The_End_Arrives 32 points ago +32 / -0

30-50% of the world has already injected themselves, it's FOREVER in the DNA chain now. These people will reproduce and pass it on into eternity.

33
Moebius 33 points ago +34 / -1

Then again...maybe they won't. Maybe they won't be able to reproduce...

14
AHonkTooFar 14 points ago +15 / -1

Some have, but who knows how long the kids will survive.... or not. Plenty have died in the months since being born.

11
Tony-Wayt 11 points ago +11 / -0

If it does indeed cause sterility (And I believe this will prove to be true on a massive scale eventually) yet some have already produced, then the kids will be sterile anyway. It just moves Bill Gates and George Soros' wet dream one generation down.

9
AHonkTooFar 9 points ago +9 / -0

It does but it doesn't do it reliably, it's a pretty shoddy sterilizing agent since the intent seems to be to maim and shave years off life expectancy more so than just render you sterile. The latter seems to be an 'added bonus' as far as the elites are concerned.

3
Shakyrob 3 points ago +3 / -0

I honestly don't think they actually intended for it to do anything reliably. It's like a digital dice rolling program only "organic" and they don't give a damn what horror is rolled. Though they will use the terror from any results rolled in mass to further their control. Either to "control" a situation with a "cure" or to snuff out a rival. Like "Pepsi is to blame for the brain tumors so Coka-a-cola is the new state sanctioned carbinated beverage." That kinda shit. Chaos is easy to manage. Clear intent wakes people up faster.

2
Heavy_Metal_Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stay Pureblood my frens!

1
00Gonzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think a lot of the worst side effects are from people administering the injections into the blood stream instead of the muscle tissue. The spike proteins can then find their way into other organs including the ovaries in women. Scary stuff

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elsewhere people have pointed out recently that normally to create safe vaccine assembly lines you need a year+ time to avoid contamination and other issues. Most of the vaccine deaths could honestly be explained by tainted shots and bad administration of shots.

1
sumnayin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is funny, because if two people breed but cannot produce sterile offspring then they are from 2 different species.

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

On one hand, the first world nations already have population declines due to birth rates, so the wrong populations are getting it.

On the other hand, allowing the 3rd world to overrun the 1st world might be the idea.

3
Moebius 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's also been quite the uptick in stillbirths and miscarriages...

2
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼??

5
NazisWereSocialist 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don’t fuck the vaccinated

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
5
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 5 points ago +5 / -0

Damn I hadn’t really thought of this…have we tested babies yet to see if this is passed on by a means other than breast milk?

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +1 / -0

a "tiny bit" in one person could mean nothing, in someone else, a slow chain reaction that means cancer eventually. Viruses don't "change your DNA" they change the DNA of only the cells they infect for the purposes of reproduction. They do not mutate whole people.

The author is a dumb dumb but what he's trying to explain is how T and B cells develop to recognize and bind to new antigens. Naive T and B cells are the only cells in your body aside from sex cells that can change their DNA (for a few specific genes) to adapt to new pathogens. It's called somatic hypermutation

54
chungus47 54 points ago +60 / -6

(((Salzburg)))

33
Easzq8 33 points ago +34 / -1

As a Jewish guy I speak on behalf of my people; fuck that guy

11
chungus47 11 points ago +12 / -1

You know, I've never cared about who prays to who.

But c'mon man.

9
Easzq8 9 points ago +9 / -0

That phrase is a little Bideny... Aside, I don’t pray to the yaldaboath if that’s your concern. Baal and Moloch can go suck on Richard Simmons’ asshole.

5
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 5 points ago +5 / -0

He stole the phrase because it’s typically used when people are being truthful. He found it worked to cover up his lies and kept repeating.

6
Easzq8 6 points ago +6 / -0

I amazed that there are so many legions lined up to whore themselves out to fame and power at any and all moral corruption.

2
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, there is so much false equivalency that they think, “sure this side is bad, but Trump has had some DIVORCES!!! 1/1,000 of the anti-gay Republicans, actually are gay. They’re worse than us because they say it’s wrong but then do it themselves.” So then they whore themselves out to the side that gives them free stuff and says they’re going to give everyone free pizza and a soda machine in class.. etc etc. So I guess all that to say, yes, I agree. Lol

6
Easzq8 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it weren’t for double standards the Left would have no standards at all. And they sure like pizza, and fish, and eggs, and hotdogs, and nut sauce etc.

3
chungus47 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah I said it out of sarcasm. Also idk what any of that is.

I do like based Jews though, one of my friends is from Israel and he's great. Also I trained Krav Maga which was fun.

3
Easzq8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kung fu of any type is my jam, brah. I hope most Jewish folks haven’t done you dirty. That being the case, I don’t know where these evil-loving Hollywood types keep coming from...

2
chungus47 2 points ago +2 / -0

I legit don't know either, I just know they typically write articles that are able to persuade people of their garbage. The only thing I can gather is maybe the owners of certain companies are also Jewish and have similar likes, and likes beget likes. Also I know in some religions, especially Mormon and Islam, they very much bias toward their religion.

3
Easzq8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely a thing, “why walk across the street when you can go down the hall?” Everyone is in part tribal. That doesn’t excuse kiddy diddling, theft, or murder tho.

6
colonel-beans 6 points ago +12 / -6

You should repent. Accept the Messiah and rejoice for being saved.

John 3:16

4
Easzq8 4 points ago +7 / -3

Nah, I do not consider myself damned for being born. I love God and do my best to make an open and personal relationship with Him. I do not need an intermediary.

1
colonel-beans 1 point ago +5 / -4

Repent or be separated from Him for all eternity. "but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven." Matthew 10:33

Jesus Christ is the way. There is NO way to Heaven outside of Him.

3
Easzq8 3 points ago +5 / -2

“I am the light and the way, follow me.” Jesus wanted people to emulate his path, one might assume he did not want folks to become obsessed with him as a figure.

-1
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial -1 points ago +1 / -2

Isaiah 53

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +4 / -3

Sorry, that has never been my experience of the infinite. Also, I do not respond well to extortion.

1
TangoMike 1 point ago +3 / -2

It is not extortion to give warning about the penalty of one's own crimes.

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +3 / -2

I know the cost of those crimes quite well, that’s why I have sworn not to lie or to steal.

-1
todiwan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lol you're a clown, seriously. You're making a mockery of your own religion. Keep it to yourself and fuck off. This is why you lost institutional power.

2
colonel-beans 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will pray for you. Repent before it’s too late. Jesus loves you and died for your sins.

0
TangoMike 0 points ago +2 / -2

No one would consider you damned for being born. However, we have all lied, stolen, cheated (and so on) and are therefore guilty of breaking God's universal laws. God has provided a method to be forgiven, as colonel-beans has mentioned!

3
Easzq8 3 points ago +4 / -1

I consider it my responsibility to make amends to those I have wronged and to lay my failings out before God. I will fall short of His glory but I made an oath to Him to clear away all in me that blocks me from reflecting Him. I work constantly, picking away one fleck at a time. Only God knows my heart, I will never attempt to hide away. One, it is a contradiction in terms, two, I would never want to.

1
TangoMike 1 point ago +3 / -2

It is certainly good to maintain healthy relationships with others. What about with God? He says that an unrepentant heart is not capable of pleasing Him (Rom. 8:7-8). Our good works are like filthy rags, not capable of cleansing (Is. 64:6).

If you believe in Jesus, you will not fall short of His glory--His righteousness is made available (Rom. 4:5).

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +2 / -1

I wish to maintain a good relationship with both God and people. Still, you refer to the Bible to support your arguments based on the assumption that all of it is true outright. I’m not going to meet you there. “It is known Kaleesi” type arguments.

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one would consider you damned for being born.

I mean, that's literally what original sin is.

Having an un-damn-ing ritual (baptism) doesn't change the belief.

0
TangoMike 0 points ago +1 / -1

An infant is not held responsible for the original sin. They did not commit it. Of course, they inherit a sinful nature from their parents (a consequence of the original sin). An infant does not possess the capability to understand right from wrong and to reason about God. Therefore, they are not damned.

The only way to avoid damnation is salvation through Jesus Christ. Baptism is an act of obedience following that prerequisite.

2
Shalomtoyou 2 points ago +3 / -1

Me too.

That's why I prefer rubbing elbows with the Chabad than the Reform country clubs.

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +2 / -1

Mah yid! duchening hand gestures ensue

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
GreatestAmericanHero 19 points ago +21 / -2

every time

4
AHonkTooFar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Salzberg lol, Salzburg is one of the biggest towns in Austria and this guy doesn't look quite that fat.

4
Goldsteinbergsky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup...

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
dixond 0 points ago +2 / -2

Fucking.

33
deleted 33 points ago +33 / -0
44
bubadmt 44 points ago +44 / -0

From the article: "Remember that the whole point of a vaccine is to prevent future infections. "

How's that working out for you so far?

15
Enlightenment_Now 15 points ago +15 / -0

So smug, this author.

How can he stand himself?

Excerpt:

One of the common tropes among anti-vaxxers lately is that the Covid-19 vaccine “changes your DNA.” Oh, the horrors!

Do they even know what they mean by that? Almost certainly not. Anti-vaxxers generally have no idea how biology works; often they are so confused that I’m tempted to say they are not even wrong. Even when they are right about something, it’s for the wrong reasons.

13
20KAG20 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fuck this piece of shit. He has no balls and does what anyone tells him to do. A cuck through and through.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
DaninElkhart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Smug, Yes. Salzburg writes for Forbes and cites The Atlantic. So, when they were writing their smug articles about Russia collusion, were we supposed to believe them then, too? In Latin:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"

5
conservatarian 5 points ago +5 / -0

His ideas about biology almost certainly includes men getting pregnant and nursing babies, and women having penises.

10
Voiceofreason72 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nice job!

8
Captinhowdy45 8 points ago +8 / -0

So before I quit reading I gathered that even mnra can't change your DNA. Yet I'm supposed to believe that. Dr's can turn me into what ever gender I feel like today.🤔🤔🤔🤔

3
VonTyger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Archive link is not working.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
VonTyger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird, it wasn't up earlier...

27
ChyNahAzzWhole1 27 points ago +27 / -0

Lie after Lie after Lie... mRNA changes you, they jab does not provide immunity... the jab can cause Myocarditis... blood clots, strokes, nerve damage, aneurysms... Oh, only the VACCINATED transmit the Moronic Variant.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
23
abstr4ct 23 points ago +24 / -1

For those who want the truth:

"Okay, take a deep breath and we’ll dive in. Whenever your body is invaded by a foreign cell–whether it’s a bacteria, a virus, a fungus, or some other pathogen–your immune system starts selecting from among millions of specialized proteins called antibodies, each one a little different. The way it does this is really rather extraordinary: many little pieces of your DNA are cut and pasted together, in millions of combinations, each making a different antibody. Eventually, one of these antibodies “recognizes” the pathogen (by binding to it).

What’s even more amazing is that the successful antibodies are “remembered” by the immune system, in the form of special cells called B-cells that have slightly different DNA! The DNA in these B-cells encodes just the right antibody to recognize the invader–the Covid-19 virus, that is. Once you recover from the infection, some of those immune cells (B-cells and T-cells–it’s complicated) persist in your lymph nodes, constantly looking for any reappearance of the virus.

(Or to be more precise, as an immunologist colleague explained to me: the vaccine doesn’t change any DNA, even in your immune cells, but it causes the proliferation of certain immune cells that have have already undergone genetic rearrangement.)"

6
JohnDoe81627 6 points ago +7 / -1

What I don't understand about the author's position here is how does the creation of these new B cells change your DNA?

My takeaway from the research I've done is that the body has dynamically created these new B cells to target the specific antigen; there's no mention of changing the body's DNA as a result.

I believe this author has conflated two different points on this topic: the creation of brand new cells, and the modification of a person's genetic sequence. And I believe this person can get away with it because of how generic the term "DNA" is.

My concern to these injections is not that they influence the creation of new DNA; rather, I am concerned about how these injections modify my genetic sequence (al-la Crisper-type genome changes)

7
abstr4ct 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yes, you get it exactly. That was my point for posting. I know it was not clear but i knew the intelligent would follow.

To be specific, As far as i can tell, they do not modify your actual DNA as in a CRISPR way, but instead just facilitate the creation of B-cells, which are not part of creating you or your progeny.

This is the real reason the author got criticism in the twitter thread as he was being alarmist, but i do appreciate his attention to detail. But shock titles are lame.

5
JohnDoe81627 5 points ago +6 / -1

My concern about DNA genome modification is fueled, in part, by the fact that none of the pharmaceutical companies even bothered to test the genetic toxicity (their terminology) of the COVID injections.

The truth is, no one knows what this does to our genome because it was never studied

4
abstr4ct 4 points ago +6 / -2

I wouldn't go that far. but you raise a good point. I think the general understanding of MRNA vs DNA is what is used to understand the vaccine. Meaning MRNA is the snapchat of DNA, where DNA is long-term.

I do not discount your point, as only long-term data is truth. But in war, it is fair to make some educated guesses.

To be clear, i never thought this was vax/antivax. But choice vs mandate. That is my problem.

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +2 / -1

The DNA of those B and T cells IS different from the rest of your body, though. He's not wrong on that part. But it doesn't affect the genes of the rest of your cell types.

1
abstr4ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

correct, so its sort of a dramatic title is my point.

OMFG CHANGES YUR DNA.

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. All the titles are shit clickbait designed to be ragebait.

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +2 / -1

What I don't understand about the author's position here is how does the creation of these new B cells change your DNA?

The DNA of those specific B cells (also T Cells but whatever) encodes for a slightly different antibody, which means that it's genetic code is not identical to the DNA of your non-immune cells. But it's only those cell types, and only a tiny fraction of their genetics that changes.

Remember that every cell in your body has a copy of your DNA. In every cell type except for B and T cells, sex cells, and cancer/pre-cancer cells, your DNA should be practically identical (in terms of sequence at least.) But in B and T cells they have the ability to change their genes for antibody creation to allow for dynamically adjustible antibodies to respond to new threats.

1
Wanderlust 1 point ago +2 / -1

B and T cells don't change their DNA, they just have variable ways to express the DNA.

Edit: I was wrong.

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +1 / -0

Incorrect. They permanently and irreversibly alter the genetic sequences of their antibody-expressing genes. It's a process called somatic hypermutation.

The mechanism of SHM involves deamination of cytosine to uracil in DNA by the enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase, or AID.[10][11] A cytosine:guanine pair is thus directly mutated to a uracil:guanine mismatch. Uracil residues are not normally found in DNA, therefore, to maintain the integrity of the genome, most of these mutations must be repaired by high-fidelity Base excision repair enzymes. The uracil bases are removed by the repair enzyme, uracil-DNA glycosylase.[11] Error-prone DNA polymerases are then recruited to fill in the gap and create mutations.[10][12]

The synthesis of this new DNA involves error-prone DNA polymerases, which often introduce mutations at the position of the deaminated cytosine itself or neighboring base pairs. During B cell division the immunoglobulin variable region DNA is transcribed and translated. The introduction of mutations in the rapidly proliferating population of B cells ultimately culminates in the production of thousands of B cells, possessing slightly different receptors and varying specificity for the antigen, from which the B cell with highest affinities for the antigen can be selected. The B cells with the greatest affinity will then be selected to differentiate into plasma cells producing antibody and long-lived memory B cells contributing to enhanced immune responses upon reinfection.[2]

1
Wanderlust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pardon my ignorance. Thanks for the quotes. My memory failed me on this one.

5
ChuckedBeef 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's not a vaccine though, and it's redundant.

4
abstr4ct 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am pasting what is actually meant by "changing DNA" for people who don't want to click around and find it.

2
gimpchimp 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the Jab makers are playing God?

20
wethedownvoted 20 points ago +20 / -0

So I read this article and this is what I got from it: the "vaccine" doesn't alter your DNA, it changes its purpose.

So for example, you have an accountant. The "vaccine" now has your accountant working as a lawyer.

It's all very safe and nothing could go wrong.

9
SomaMinded 9 points ago +9 / -0

How does something, "change its purpose", without altering it? Classic oxymoron situation. You know.. "jumbo/shimp ... Biggie/Smalls" .. change without alter... Alter without change..

14
wethedownvoted 14 points ago +14 / -0

well.. a motor can be connected to a gearbox, or to a pump just by changing the link -- in this case, mRNA is the link.

so yeah, technically they didn't modify the motor, but it's doing something completely different, and the thing it used to be doing is no longer being done

6
LuckyStr1ke 6 points ago +6 / -0

Great analogy and spot on.

3
taterthot 3 points ago +3 / -0

And influenza and China flu also introduce rna into cells and change the link too

0
thekindlyman555 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not really accurate. Your body has a set of immune cells called B and T cells that are part of the adaptive immune system. They start off as naive cells that do not have strong affinity to any particular antigen. They undergo a process called somatic hypermutation that allows their antibody genes to code for different shapes of antibody to allow them to recognize different pathogens. Once an immune cell antibody matches up with a pathogen, that cell gets preserved by replicating and creating memory cells and it becomes part of your immune memory, and also helps remove the pathogen.

But it's only these specific cell types that have this ability, and only the genes for antibody creation are modified in the process.

11
Fignugent 11 points ago +11 / -0

IT'S GOOD IT'S GREAT IT'S THE BEST THING EVER

YOU AIN'T NEVER SEEN NOTHING LIKE IT

DON'T YOU FUCKING INVESTIGATE ANYTHING JUST KNOW WE ALREADY DID THAT

IT'S FUCKING FANTASTIC

8
GenericInsult 8 points ago +8 / -0

Have these people never seen the movie: I am Legend?

24
anon073121 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yes but they all think they are will smith in the movie not realizing they are actually the screaming mutant.

6
GenericInsult 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fair assessment.

3
AussieTrumpFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey, it would make more sense for them to be Will Smith. In the book (and if you watch the movie close enough, the movie, too) he's the evil character basically genociding a society of mutants who were making the best of what they were given (and trying to reclaim those Will Smith had captured / tortured / killed).

So, not the hero at all. If the vaxxtards want to be Will Smith, I'm not going to stop them.

1
anon073121 1 point ago +1 / -0

In addition if you watch closely he is immune because he used his genetic code to create the virus that caused the problem. So your analogy may be right.

1
AussieTrumpFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oooooooh! I think I missed that particular detail. Is that only in the movie?

1
anon073121 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't read the book. But in the movie at the beginning when they are evacuating he mentions the vaccine he was working on wasn't working as he planned. Then he goes a bit insane insisting he can fix this so on. Later in the movie he mentions that the vaccine is based on his DNA. I think it is during one of his recordings. He doesn't refer to himself directly but as like now getting pathogen from patient zero as he draws his own blood.

1
AussieTrumpFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. That makes sense. I think the book makes it clearer how evil he actually is.

1
BobDolesBanana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh my i never finished the movie thanks for letting me know the ending no wonder i gave up half way

7
IvIA6A 7 points ago +7 / -0

Changing your DNA decidedly is not "a good thing", it's a recipe for cancer.

6
SomaMinded 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some fucking idiot right now is thinking, "I always wanted to have super powers."

2
thekindlyman555 2 points ago +3 / -1

In general, you're right. But this article is referring specifically to a known process in B and T Cells called somatic hypermutation, which is what allows our immune system to adaptively respond to new pathogens. It's an essential part of how our immune system functions, and it's the primary mechanism utilized by vaccines (ALL vaccines, not just the mRNA ones) to initiate the process of immune memory generation.

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough. Thanks

6
South_Florida_Guy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Humans and chimpanzees have just a "tiny bit" of difference in DNA, just over 1% (although some might be closer...)

1
climatestatis 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's about 5000 bases/nucleotides that are introduced in the form of mRNA from the 'vaccine', which trigger the creation of spike proteins inside the cell. These don't pass through the main DNA, but are processed directly by the cell's 'factory' ribosomes that make proteins. The ribosomes see them floating around and make what they direct.

These spike proteins are then broken down inside the cell, the bits are anchored to the outside of the cell, which triggers the immune system to be able to recognise them if introduced later on the surface of the virus. The thing outside the cell that picks up the bits of anchored spike protein also kills off the cell that was used to trigger the immune response creation. This stops the cell from producing endless bits of spike protein.

Human DNA has about 3 billion base pairs. So even if there was a mechanism to get the 5000 sequence mRNA content into the main cell DNA it would be about 0.0002% of your DNA in that cell, a long way from the chimpanzee's 1% difference. There are a lot of differences between people that depend on small changes, e.g. 3 base pairs control eye color, so if there was a suitable mechanism then 5000 differences could have significant effects. There's no known mechanism to get the introduced mRNA back into the cell's permanent DNA.

I'm not saying that there aren't side-effects, a dropping response, or increases in myocarditis, stillbirths etc. I don't know how that is working, just that there's no known mechanism to change the infected cell's main DNA content, especially permanently.

5
QMAB 5 points ago +5 / -0

The second one is the closest to the truth but the conclusion is wrong. Natural illness and immunity always trumps vaccines unless the disease causes permanent disability or is fatal. Covid matches neither of these descriptions.

5
sickofaltspin 5 points ago +5 / -0

They've gone to plaid...

2
CaptainButthurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

This made me laugh too much and the voice of John Candy saying it in my head LOL

4
SteelMongoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even if the shot were safer than the virus, vaccines aren't supposed to be a competing form of the disease.

4
LesboPregnancyScare 4 points ago +4 / -0

"a tiny bit" is the difference between fucking dying or being crippled from some horrible genetic disease or not.

4
SomaMinded 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting fact:
There is more rna/dna inside you from microbes/bacteria/viruses/parasites/eukaryotes/gut fauna (outdated term)/archaea/insects/...etc, then your own dna. Most of your weight isn't even yours. Less then half of 'You' is technically even human... Huh, the more you know. 🤔

2
gimpchimp 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a good symbiotic relationship without adding a human derived substance. Took millions of years to get the right recipe.

2
SomaMinded 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see you use logic. Hard to find nowadays lol

3
WhoMeTwo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lord all Mighty! These people are insufferably stupid.

3
JohnDoe81627 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can a doctor or nurse pede comment on the main point of the article which states that DNA is altered as the body creates antibodies for any infection?

The author is claiming our DNA is modified whenever the body fights off an infection (including one induced by the COVID vaccines)

I've tried doing research on this topic and I've got as far as how our body creates B cell lymphocytes to generate antibodies for the virus and that these B cells remain after the infection is gone.

However, it is not clear what role DNA plays in this whole process

1
Snerdley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Part of the DNA within the memory cells of the immune system is a record of the protein's necessary to fight every disease you've previously encountered and survived. As your immune system finds a combination that defeats the coronavirus (or just the S1Spike protein generated by the Jab) it adds its recipe to the DNA that gets replicated in every new memory cell.

3
TommyJarvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a straw man, just like the “microchip” line. It’s intended to ridicule sensible objections to the clot shot.

I know the clot shot doesn’t “alter my DNA”, dumbasses.

3
PepePinochet 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a berg that sank the titanic...

3
Snerdley 3 points ago +3 / -0

He literally just described Antibody Dependant Enhancement (ADE)

The immune system "remembers" the antibody that worked against the Spike protein, and clones many of those to fight any covid variant even if that particular variant effectively evades that particular antibody. This sets the entire immune systems back to square one when covid is encountered.

Eventually, if you're lucky enough to survive long enough to find the correct antibody after your body learns the original one didn't work, Covid has a huge head start, and your body has depleted many of the proteins necessary to ramp up another army of the correct antibodies. Also, all these extra antibodies (from the vaxx version) are in the way, gunming up the works, creating debris that can cause clots or pneumonia, lowering your ultimate chance of survival.

This doesn't even begin to account for the damage of trillions of Vaxx produced S1Spike proteins floating around your system, attaching to Ace receptors on almost any human cell in the body, causing inflammation or clots.

3
Kavantar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just changing your DNA a little tiny bit. Anyway, change of subject.. did you know chimpanzees DNA is 99% similar to humans?

2
Pats5x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Salzberg

2
Liskamm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literal translation of his name: "salt mountain" ... this is too good. Get yer shovels ready!

2
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 2 points ago +2 / -0

So we're anti-GMO now here? This timeline is bizarre.

4
HugeCockandBalls 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ironic that the people screaming about not wanting genetically modified food are the people demanding everyone take a genetically modifying vaccine

2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's just no way to clean up this atrocity.

2
Marshall2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Time for TRUTH - Change the name to FIBBS!

2
PromiseImNotASpook 2 points ago +2 / -0

Many of these "contributors" both at orgs like Forbes or on Twitter give me some major uncanny valley vibes... I'm certain that many of these people are not real and it is all the same person pretending to be them to mass spam shit like this.

2
crash7863 2 points ago +3 / -1

Salzberg.

berg.

I don't notice patterns.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Username455231 2 points ago +2 / -0

HAHAHAHAHA! - nice grab!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Pepe-Meme 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is all three you whhhiiittte supreme pizza science bigots!!! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

2
PhantomShield72 2 points ago +2 / -0

They all have the same exact time/date stamp...

2
Bdiazhatescommies 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got double vaxxed as did my wife. We are both pretty fat and work around a lot of people. I hope I didnt fuck us both. It wasnt an easy decision. Yeah, probably fucked.

2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eventually. Take the Zelenko Protocol and you might not die from the clots.

2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

"And that's a good thing!"

2
SJBHamilton 2 points ago +2 / -0

What complete and utter bullshittery.

"That's a good thing" is strictly reserved for Martha Stewart baking and crafts. Otherwise it's not.

1
SomaMinded 1 point ago +1 / -0

"... only happy mistakes." 😏

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Rubicante 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you unironically use the phrase "And that's a good thing." in an article title, you're full of shit. You know you're full of shit. You deserve to be burried in a shallow grave.

2
gimpchimp 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder if they can give me an extra Chromosome?

2
GrayManNumber333 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is just trolling you to get your clicks. He says little about the mRNA, mostly just talks about immune response.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BlitheringIdiot 2 points ago +2 / -0

C'mon, Berg. You can manipulate us better...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Big_Don_45_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Steven Salzberg was not having a good day.

1
GeneralBoobs 1 point ago +1 / -0

"You only get a craving for rare meat. Incredibly rare. There's no such thing as brain-dead cannibals."

"It doesn't make you eat the flesh of the living. It's that good for you!"

"One bite and you'll never have to worry about eating your vegetables again."

1
alien123 1 point ago +1 / -0

makes me think cancer is caused by a virus?

wouldn't cancer be like a virus changing your cell dna and replicating in your body with the wrong dna?

1
temno 1 point ago +1 / -0

the headline was... fortified

1
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re fucking kidding me.

1
sneak 1 point ago +1 / -0

It clearly fortifies your DNA...