3831
Comments (151)
sorted by:
188
canadianhere 188 points ago +189 / -1

"Not just Trump people and not just conservatives – every progressive, every liberal in this country that likes freedom of speech and liberty should be fighting for this case."

But that's just it. There are no progressives and liberals left who like freedom of speech and liberty.

44
War_Hamster 44 points ago +44 / -0

I am an open Liberal, in the spirit of John Locke.

You know, THE FATHER OF LIBERALISM?

He believed in things like freedom of speech, due process, limited government, and pretty much everything the US government currently doesn't do anymore.

We founded the damn country on these principles. Thomas Jefferson agreed.

39
18-to-life 39 points ago +39 / -0

Make liberal liberal again

34
War_Hamster 34 points ago +34 / -0

I want my word back.

13
mharmless 13 points ago +13 / -0

No word has ever been recovered once leftists took it.

8
ConsrvspkgNJ 8 points ago +8 / -0

nor any freedom or right

10
Canlog96 10 points ago +10 / -0

I could go for a real classical liberal party in the USA. Any good republic does need more than one party and as tempting as some may find it to just have the Trump party all the time, Americans do need choices. And evidently the democrats are collapsing so why not shake things up? Throw out the reps and dems and add the lion party and [insert name here]

16
Vermino 16 points ago +16 / -0

I miss the old liberals. These leftists and Rinos are fucking nuts.

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +9 / -0

Imagine if I were the face of Liberalism. We'd actually have a conversation and a country.

3
marvinthehaggler 3 points ago +3 / -0

And tacos?

Wait... we've got the tacos.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they come for my fish tacos, it's on. That's my red line in the sand.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I knew I'd get you with that one, San Diego boy. Heh.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Btw, what's the name of that tiny taco stand right on the beach in Mission Bay? It probably doesn't even exist anymore. I used to jog to it and rock out with a burrito on a Saturday. It was gringos making burritos, but it was good.

Lots of surfer-dude burritos up in Encinitas and Carlsbad too. All good.

And then the further South you go the more likely it is you can get a real Mehicano burrito/taco. I used to live somewhat close to the border and was known as the gringo who would go buy the buche, lengua and carnitas by the pound. ;)

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's several taco stands in the Mission Bay area. I never remember the names, but the Albierto's in PB behind the Denny's makes the best chicken tacos on the planet.

I live up in North County now, and would agree about the Encinitas taco stands.

I've got a South African buddy who buys Mexican food like you do. We have feasts on his boat out of Chula Vista and always buy from the Mexican grocery stores.

2
vegaspatriot1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

we have the best taco bowls folks, believe me!

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • thumbs up
  • shitlord grin
2
vegaspatriot1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

😁😁😁

6
Demig80 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean the Thomas Jefferson whose statue got pulled down? That's how far we've gone..

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Infuriating.

5
WeAreGonnaWin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Already in 2015

"liberals" = msm propaganda believer cult members

liberal minded = Trump supporters fighting for freedom of speech, due process, limited government...

3
vegaspatriot1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am shoulder to shoulder with you my friend!

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cheers. I think there's more of us than we know.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Winterds001 1 point ago +1 / -0

Err I consider myself pretty liberal, America first, free speech and liberty all the way.

2
Trumpwon306 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those aren't liberal ideas, those are conservative ideas.

0
Winterds001 0 points ago +1 / -1

Welp, im pro gay marriage, do not care about religion. Don't think those are conservative values ? Maybe then because I am an immigrant who loves this country ? I don't know.

2
Trumpwon306 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm an immigrant myself.

"Gay Marriage" is an oxymoron, that means it's a set of words that contradict each other because Marriage is defined by the most important text ever written to be between one man and one woman.

You don't care about religion? You're basically a liberal then. Irreligious people tend to worship themselves instead of worshiping God, that breeds the sort of society you see today; Greedy, Lustful, Envious, Gluttony, Slothful, Prideful, and Wrathful.

Contrast this with a free Christian society that evokes Chastity, Temperance, Diligence, Humility, Charity, Kindness and Patience.

There is one path to heaven but many highways to hell.

God sent his only begotten son to die on the cross for our sins and he did so willingly, with love in his heart even in the nadir of despair that was his Crucifixion.

A life spent rejecting that sacrifice is a life that is empty and without purpose. I hope you recant this apathy and really join us to stand united against the evil people trying to destroy us.

God Bless You.

2
Winterds001 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. Don't think its a good system to make a person not be allowed to be happy and benefit from a system they are already paying into just because they like the same sex.

Religion is poison. The most unhinged people I have met besides the crazy Leftists are religious people. "if you don't worship the man in the sky, you going to hell", what a bunch of bullshit.

And when I ask why does your God allow children to be abused, raped or suffering from cancer when they are the most innocent and should be protected, no answer or some lame fucking excuse that "its all part of god's plan". Get the fuck out of here.

Basically you do you, just don't fucking push your crazy shit on me others a vaccine.

2
Trumpwon306 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because we're not in heaven. We're on earth. Instead of complaining about the suffering going around the world perpetuated by humans against other humans, why aren't you thankful and grateful that you're alive at all? Better yet, why don't you do something about it instead of whining online about it?

You ask "muh why does god allow X" my answer is because life is not life without suffering, without death, without consequences. If God intervenes to prevent all harm, then there is no point to life. That's just leftist nonsense, from people who think there is nothing after they die so they become so terrified of dying that they seek to prevent all harms from happening.

It's an immature and weak view on life that is enabled by evil forces in order to lure you away from the path of the righteous.

Do you think people are inherently good or inherently bad? The answer to that question will tell me a lot about you.

1
Winterds001 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Because we are not in heaven" lol

Sound like a leftist with their delusion that the vaccine works.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Trumpwon306 1 point ago +1 / -0

So from your point of view if you see someone going on the wrong path in life, your moral code tells you it's actually better to do nothing or say nothing from stopping them from doing so?

That's not a moral code, that's sloth and apathy which decades of liberal propaganda has psyop'd people into thinking tolerating evil is worth the price of not having to get up and do something worthwhile for once.

Hate?

Hate would be saying nothing, doing nothing, and observing as you kill yourself by living an empty life, and killing your soul in your ever desperate attempts at achieving happiness by degrading your body and mind with anything that can give you a moment of satisfaction.

I love my neighbor because I run into his garage and turn off the car he was using to asphyxiate himself. You could care less about your neighbor, you just don't want to be held accountable to anyone but your own 'code' of conduct which is ever changing, never steady and always absent in moments of hardship.

-29
Imransgarage -29 points ago +24 / -53

That’s not true.

44
DWAC 44 points ago +46 / -2

Depends if you allow the members of a group to define their title by their actions or change their title such that it fits their actions.

Those calling themselves the progressive left are actually Marxists.

17
War_Hamster 17 points ago +17 / -0

Progressives have always been Marxists, just ones with a different timeline.

The bigger crime of misrepresentation is those who call themselves "liberal" while opining for State power.

5
DWAC 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think progressive was used by both liberals and Marxists in the beginning. Liberals thought it was hip and edgy while Marxists used the name to cover their monstrous designs. I think there are still liberals out there who are really liberals in philosophy but continue to follow the Marxists because they either don't know what's really going on or don't know what to do to get out.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'd like to suggest you read up on the Fabian Socialists. These were the 'soft communists' who ushered in the Progressive period in America. They hijacked the anti-trust, anti-bank populist movements and gave us two corrupt political parties instead of one (feel free to pontificate on which became corrupt first).

They are the reason we got the 1913 acts, as they used popular uprisings against the banks and monopolies to enshrine the banks and monopolies.

They were people from the "right" and the "left". R and D. Liberalism was hijacked.

4
DWAC 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll brush up. I've read about the Fabians but it's been some years.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let me know if you'd like some suggested reading/watching.

You're a pretty astute commenter here, so I think you'll see the same things I've figured out.

2
MobileDev4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not always, for a few years in the 1940s a lot of them were Nazis. Eugenics and Nationalizing the economy are pillars of progressive agendas.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Socialism and Marxism are pretty closely related, no?

1
MobileDev4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes and many of the same people were involved in both. True Believers lists a number of people who bounced between the two factions.

12
ItDoesntDoThat 12 points ago +12 / -0

Oh yeah? Why are they so mysteriously silent...

13
fat50 13 points ago +13 / -0

We're not. We're Trump supporters.

0
KAGMAGIC2020 0 points ago +3 / -3

Ok so you're saying that you are a liberal?

5
RiMjObZ4dAyZ 5 points ago +5 / -0

Myself, I'm more of a centrist libertarian. Liberals and Conservatives are different sides of the same coin.

10
SideOBeef2016 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm a liberal. But by today's bastardized def of liberal I'd actually be considered an evil white supreme

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I openly parade the fact that I'm liberal. I welcome the opportunity to explain why.

2
RiMjObZ4dAyZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Accept it, then use it as an opportunity to have fun.

3
fat50 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've been saying it for years. Sane liberals are Trump supporters. The insane ones are like Bill Maher and Dave Chappelle. They know something is deeply wrong with the left, but can't seem to figure out that Trump was part of the solution.

"Progressives" are neither progressive nor liberal, yet the right blames everything(wrongly) on liberals. Progressives/leftists/commies are the problem. Liberals still sucking Democrat cock need to wake the fuck up.

2
KAGMAGIC2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

When will classic liberals come to the light side of the force?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm 100% Classical Liberal.

I'll defend my views all day long.

4
Imransgarage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because they don’t realize they hold left wing media as a higher value.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
CommunismIsForLosers 2 points ago +2 / -0

--Every progressive

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
mobgrazer 1 point ago +1 / -0

They say they support it but then out comes the: "hate speech is not free speech" "misinformation has to be dealt with" "those that deny trans women are women shouldn't be given a platform" Etc.

Then you know these are just goose stepping authoritarians who pretend to support free speech because they are intellectually dishonest scum.

Edit: There are maybe 1 of 1000 progressives like russell brand or Glen greenwald that support free speech without reservation, and some liberals who are classical liberals...but they are few and far between.

51
Buck_Fiden 51 points ago +51 / -0

It's not Biden's DOJ. It's DOJ's Biden.

9
Kilroy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Excellent point!

43
ChikfilaFan [S] 43 points ago +44 / -1

This is an excellent article. Read it.

15
DiscoverAFire 15 points ago +15 / -0

Members of the public should make their own independent judgment as to whether the U.S. Department of Justice is committed to a just result based upon all the facts

32
gamingthisandthat 32 points ago +32 / -0

smart move - dont fuck with bannon

27
Imransgarage 27 points ago +27 / -0

He does that better than almost anyone on the right - builds a big tent.

7
Nimblenavigator1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Came here to say this. As a War Room listener, it would be unwise to trifle with Steve Bannon.

3
ChelseaHubbell 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dudes a billionaire isn't he? He was part of Seinfeld

1
SteveBannonsNckbeard 1 point ago +1 / -0

And had a stint as an executive at Goldman's M&A dept. Dude's smart, and probably very rich

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
22
preferredfault 22 points ago +22 / -0

What it's ultimately going to show is that the reason for the subpoena wasn't justified, and that they outright fabricated information to the grand jury to hold him in contempt. What this is really about is them trying to put him up on a stage in front of congress so they can chastise him politically, when they don't actually have a compelling reason to have him testify at all.

Basically, if information they want from him can be materially available without him testifying at all or even providing any documents to them, then the subpoena is invalid in the first place. There's actually nothing to ask Bannon about, because his entire presence on Jan 6th is recorded on video, because he was out making public speeches...with statements that clearly encouraged peacefulness, while marching with a large group of people, well away from the capitol "incident".

Congress has no right to subpoena political foes in order to hold a political show trial. It's an attempt at entrapping him with lying to congress. So it's putting someone under oath, just to try to use anything they say against them criminally, when they actually have no real justification to put him under oath in the first place. Sure, he could just sit there and plead the 5th all he wants, but that would still essentially force him to sit there while they abuse their power of office to talk down to him in front of the nation.

And let's keep in mind, the Jan 6th commission, is in and of itself illegal, because it has no legislative purpose. They're running this thing like a tribunal, when they have no tribunal powers, and certainly not over a private citizen.

1
Dravous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could he just ask questions back at them? Like ask questions they don't want to answer because they'd incriminate themselves?

4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean yeah, but all they have to do is not ask a question and spout whatever statement they want to say, which would be 90% of what would happen regardless. It would just be a chaotic mess of Bannon and whoever is questioning him at the time, arguing over each other back and forth until they try to silence him in order to get what they want to say in, and they could go as far as order the sergeant at arms to remove him for a "time out" in the penalty box for being disorderly. They want to talk down to him like he's a child, and they're the kings of the land. So there's really no point for him to partake in that.

In the end, it's all merely kabuki theater, designed to be broadcast on live TV, as a biased political attack. They're the ones that should be facing tribunals and questioning and punishment, but they're doing it to Trump's people instead. Same shit different day. They've absolutely perverted and abused the powers of congress. They don't actually have the power to do what they're doing, but they're doing it anyways, under the guise that they do have the power, and that's the whole point in refusing to go and challenging them in court.

See, Democrats want to be able to compel people to appear before them at will, for any reason. But that's not the power they legally have. Of course, they will attempt to abuse power anyways, because that's what they do. Appearing before them on command, would only serve to undermine the fact that they don't legally have the power.

21
SweetCheeses 21 points ago +21 / -0

Crazy Bastard is doing it! Amen.

19
ChikfilaFan [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

He did mention going on the offensive. I guess this is what that looks like.

Bannon is a strategic mastermind. How did the partisan unselect committee think this would go well for them!?

8
clownworld30330 8 points ago +8 / -0

Maybe they daydreamed that Bannon would do a terror? But he knows how to fight the lawfare way and knows not to do stupid shit (well, he learned not to do stupid shit after, well, doing stupid shit).

2
SteveBannonsNckbeard 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same group of morons that thought impeaching Trump would work? Not surprised they walked into another trap

2
that_sound 2 points ago +2 / -0

and Abirthingperson.

20
Grindelwald 20 points ago +20 / -0

Bannon is Aquaman.

15
Spaceforcecat 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is our great American super hero! Move over Captain America

11
Snoman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Anyone who follows Bannon saw this coming..

11
RogueLeaderX 11 points ago +11 / -0

Shouldn't this be a right? The public should be able to see all evidence from a trial as long as it doesn't compromise someone's safety or privacy.

11
militarysnoopy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep, but when you have courts that just rubber stamp everything as "national security" then the system grows ever more corrupted.

3
sickofaltspin 3 points ago +3 / -0

A nation that needs this much secrecy doesn't deserve to be secure.

10
WinterSoldier82 10 points ago +10 / -0

Good. Lets see if Commie Media shares it. 🤣

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
Whoopies_tds 9 points ago +9 / -0

That is not how a Star Chamber works

7
PorchLightOn 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup. They shouldn't have messed with Bannon; he loves this.

6
OnlyTrump20 6 points ago +6 / -0

They dug up a real scorpions nest with Bannon.

7
ExileOnRedditStreet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ruh roh, Reorge....

shit's about to go public

7
OoopsItslipped 7 points ago +7 / -0

Take a page out of the Democrat’s book: keep all of the information centrally located on a hard drive behind a bullshit “Password1234” password, allow someone to “hack” it and then “leak” it to a friendly journalist. Voila, information gets out and everyone’s hand are clean

6
Law_Sam 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let’s go Bannon

6
rainbike 6 points ago +6 / -0

The doj leaked project Veritas privileged docs to nyt within an hour. They want to complain about using the public opinion to affect a legal case.

5
glow-operator-2-0 5 points ago +5 / -0

WHAT'S THE MATTERNJOE? AFRAID OF TRUTH?!

Does the truth burn Democrats & Communists like Holy water on vampires?

5
PacificElectric 5 points ago +5 / -0

They’re falling into his trap!!! Bahahahahaa

2
militarysnoopy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Won't they just drop the charge if he gets his way? No charge -> no discovery.

They'll look like assholes with egg on their faces, but they already look like assholes to us anyway so, meh.

1
PacificElectric 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re absolutely right

4
neokulak 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's not locked in there with them, they're locked in there with him.

3
PsyRes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brilliant! He’s the accused and he wants the truth out in public view. People will soon realize. That’s not how corrupt governments work.

3
YodaBannon 3 points ago +3 / -0

GET YOUR FUCKING PERNSILS

STEVE DONT PLAY

3
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 3 points ago +3 / -0

Love that guy

2
samgab 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was at that moment, DOJ realised... they Fucked Up.

Disclosure, bitches!

2
Keiichi81 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats sure do like keeping things secret a whole lot.

2
Theyreallinonit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The longer we keep using the terms "government" and "politicians" the longer this shit word game goes on. The term is dictatorship and dictator and henchman.

1
KnightTemplar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Justice is dead. The judge will be to scared

1
Zanthippe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give me liberty or give mey death. I'll give as good as I get.

1
KMacsBinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Release everything related to the fake insurrection. We all deserve to know how many Feds were involved and all of the actions they took that day. Not to mention the real insurrection that took place by Congress voting to accept the fraudulent electors.

1
Farage_massage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely those documents must be disclosed to his defense in discovery, and he can them make them public?

1
party12 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reason they do not want the documents made public is Adam Schiff has a habit of lying in front of cameras (without consequence).

They would rather the public not know the facts.

1
ChynahIzAzzhole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Commies hiding the truth to DESTROY America.

1
REXY23 1 point ago +1 / -0

HMMM... Wikileaks anyone?

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do it anyways.

1
Bullet3250 1 point ago +1 / -0

DOJ PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN HIDING THEIR PROSECUTION/EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENTS/EVIDENCE FOR YEARS NOW. TOTALLY UNLAWFUL.

1
RememberIssacKappy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals don't want freedom... they want to be ruled. They just ask that the rulers be gay, colored, criminals, or all the above.

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is just like the dumbass Mueller Russia troll farm indictments.

1
allyouhad 1 point ago +1 / -0

After Bannon gets them via his legal right to discovery, he can publish them (anonymously if need).

-34
deleted -34 points ago +3 / -37
36
ReformedSJW 36 points ago +36 / -0

Yeah if there was no Jan 6 I'm sure they'd all just be leaving us alone. It would be kumbaya all around. Better just be polite to them and stop protesting and they'll stop using the justice system against us. Retard.

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's a GOP establishment who wants to destroy the MAGA movement and get everyone back into the "polite politics" of electing squishy RINOs and acting meek, thinking if we are just nice to the leftists and globalist stooges that they'll be nice to us.

This is his 100th account, at least. He spends all day attacking others on here.

FYI - he also believes that Biden was legitimately elected and that its "our fault" for Trump not getting not votes.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
18
ChikfilaFan [S] 18 points ago +18 / -0

Tell your fellow glowies they shouldn't have organized the destruction which occurred in the capital.

Sorry, glowie informants I should say.

Most were just trespassing and walking through where police let them in.

Then there was Antifa Activist John Sullivan yelling "burn it down" and encouraging violence as unarmed patriot Ashley Babbitt was needlessly killed by a lefty cop.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
2
ChikfilaFan [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything I mentioned is verified both in legacy corporate media sources and independent ones.

My apologies if you're experiencing cognitive dissonance overload, glowlol

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
ChikfilaFan [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Glow harder. You've not refuted a word I've said. Have any arguments or did they not teach you that when you got off the short bus?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
President_Elect_Pepe 6 points ago +7 / -1

Maybe you’re a troll but I’ll take you seriously.

This is the constant mistake Republicans make.

We always accept their premise. Always accept their rules and then we successfully leverage those things the left just uses it’s unlimited Karen power to complain.

It’s why the media is so important.

People like yourself assume Jan 6 exists in a vacuum. Democrats in congress and the media play that game as well.

Why do you accept that? We’re you not around in 2020? Who perpetrated any violence is irrelevant. The fact is that political destruction of property was normalized by Democrats and the media in 2020.

The reason they have to freak out so hard is because they still are smart to a certain degree.

These guys in DC are useless and greedy. They know that. They also know that many people notice.

They game theory this stuff. None of it ends particularly well.

In a fair world most would end up in prison. In a less fair world things could be worse.

Their reaction to Jan 6 speaks volumes about their own guilt.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
3
President_Elect_Pepe 3 points ago +4 / -1

I’m explaining basic political optics to you braindead amateurs.

It’s funny that you complain about the media being gone. Yet you obsess over optics and place its importance ahead of winning.

Read that a second time and think about it some.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
4
zigmund_fraud 4 points ago +4 / -0

Optics absolutely matter. They are much, much less relevant when you are talking about elections that are stolen.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
President_Elect_Pepe 0 points ago +1 / -1

You may have noticed there is an increasingly large segment of the population who prefers honesty (for some strange reason) over appealing to the lowest common denominator.

But you keep taking that DC money if that’s what gets you and your husband by.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
President_Elect_Pepe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Please, keep explaining. I feel like the optics you’re providing in these eloquent replies is really helping you make the point.

So much projection today.

3
zigmund_fraud 3 points ago +3 / -0

A: What is a "vacuume?"

B: "Average voters" came out in force to vote for Trump, the January 6th protest was in response to widespread election fraud that resulted in a stolen election. The alternative was to do absolutely nothing and watch like a good little cuck while the final stage of the coup unfolded without any resistance.

C: CNN turned Nick Sandman into some kind of racist monster to their audience, they had their viewers convinced that Russia is the only reason Hillary lost, and they had already convinced their people that everyone on the right is a terrible human being that hates all minorities... You think that somehow if January 6th didn't happen they would have run out of material, or just stopped fabricating narratives?

I think you need to reevaluate your definition of an amateur.

REMINDER: Look at what has happened with COVID-19. It was weaponized against Donald Trump in the media, and is still being used as the basis to strip away countless freedoms. More and more each day. January 6th was not the "gift" you claim it was. These people lie without shame and take what they want without a second thought.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
zigmund_fraud 1 point ago +1 / -0

LMAO! You haven't done anything to strengthen your case here.

Getting overly emotional and then proceeeding with a swear word peppered rant just makes you look like a loose cannon that completely and lacks the ability to actually formulate a cogent argument. You've definitely made that case that YOU are not cut out for politics. You show the self-control of the average 15 year old leftist. In fact, I would not be surprised if you had purple hair and a "resist" bumper sticker on your Prius.

Optics are not very relevant when the opposition is willing to fabricate just about anything. Sure, Sandmann sued for libel. Did this stop the narrative from being created that the MAGA crowd is racist and a young kid was torturing a poor old native man? Nope. It did not. Did it stop them from pulling the same nonsense with Kyle Rittenhouse without missing a beat? Nope.

People went to J6 to protoest and the situation escalated. Much of that was due to the likes of Ray Epps & co. You've tried to conflate the outcome of J6 in the media with the actual purpose of the event.

A couple more points... there aren't "thousands of hours" of footage of cops being assaulted. They were very welcoming to the protesters in nearly every case. They also did not "invade" the Capitol, they were straight up allowed in and were all-in-all pretty respectful of the property and the authorities.

Shooting an unarmed woman in the neck was piss poor optics, yet that did not stop them from doing it. Your logic is shit. You've pretty much taken the stance that optics only matter for the right, so they must never do anything that could be portrayed in a negative manner in the media. Instead they should do nothing. On the other hand, the left can burn, loot, murder, steal elections, and do whatever they would like but the optics... not an issue.

You're a cuck. You're also not good at hiding your political leanings. You speak about J6 like someone that has formed their entire worldview by watching MSNBC.

Do better next time.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
The_Michael 3 points ago +3 / -0

Username checks out.