2649
Comments (73)
sorted by:
106
ttamp 106 points ago +106 / -0

r.i.p military

57
Dennislearsysbastard 57 points ago +60 / -3

It's already too late. Everyone has to test weekly on their own dime if they didn't voluntarily give up their HIPPA rights. No waivers are being issued, OPM has been doing the termination paperwork. They are just waiting for the go order.

41
okboomer59 41 points ago +42 / -1

HIPAA

33
heeeeeemeyer 33 points ago +35 / -2

I gave up correcting people on this years ago

13
peterstrzoked 13 points ago +14 / -1

I don’t always correct them, but when I do, I call it HIPPO

8
MerlynTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's the law that says the doctor can't tell you if your wife gained weight, right?

7
Buildtheadytum 7 points ago +8 / -1

People call me hippo-ass. I honestly dont think its appropriate.

3
Cornpop17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why is this so funny to me 😂

5
Buildtheadytum 5 points ago +5 / -0

You wouldn't have been laughing if you had been there to see me waddling away, with tears in my eyes, and spaghetti sauce around my mouth.

2
midgetpornrocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

PEPPERMINT HIPPO

4
USMC_Capt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hippo: see Stacy Abrams for further details.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
8
RustyShacklefordsMom 8 points ago +8 / -0

My husband went to take a test last month so he could go into the office and see his coworkers (he works remotely but they were doing a day of actually going into the office/going out to lunch— he actually really likes his coworkers so he was excited to go). Anyway, he had to go to like 5 different places to find somewhere that would do the test without an appointment, and then they asked if he was having symptoms and he said no and that it was for work. Well apparently if the test is for work you have to pay $300 out of pocket. He said F it and decided not to go. But apparently— as seems to be the case with everything now— you’re actively punished for trying to work and follow arbitrary rules to be allowed to work.

5
RustyShackleford777 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mom? Is that you?

2
Bazhosh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their goal is to isolate people.

1
wookiebush 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be a condition of work, so the employer would be responsible for the cost of the tests.

W

5
LibertyPrimeWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can buy home tests. I assume that would be what is expected if it’s on their own dime, but I wouldn’t know for sure because I haven’t been following too closely.

Or maybe the cost of going to a military testing center is automatically deducted from their pay? If I was the military, I’d want to control my testing and testing site as a security matter.

9
invalid_data 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lawsuit lawsuit lawsuit. Sue the fuck out of these tyrants.

2
ak83 2 points ago +2 / -0

Were not being forced to test every week if were unvaxxed. We are, however, being targeted in other ways. Regardlesd of the outcome, i will not being wearing a uniform much longer due to if its not this, it will be something else.

66
Rainman 66 points ago +66 / -0

Confirms military vax mandates are unlawful

24
MAKE 24 points ago +24 / -0

Confirms everything us intellectuals have known just by reading the damn text. Black and white. If you can comprehend that is..

58
NdNcenti 58 points ago +58 / -0

I remember reading this, they won’t get to it before Sep 2022, and the judge will not issue an Injunction.

39
Thetigerpoppy 39 points ago +39 / -0

So the court agrees with reality but won't do anything about it yet? Sounds like the shit show with the Wisconsin court over the 200k ballots.

14
Viewer01 14 points ago +14 / -0

The dates are going to keep getting pushed back. The DoD is staring down some massive class action over this.

10
KingOfTards 10 points ago +10 / -0

They cannot issue an injunction until the mandate deadline. It will happen.

48
hazelknut 48 points ago +48 / -0

it should immediately be a red light when one reads a medical headline that invokes the dod.

25
WuFluHoax 25 points ago +25 / -0

That was my thought as well. Why the fuck is our military branch making claims about vaccines in court????

16
M16A4 16 points ago +16 / -0

To claim they legally forced vaccinations upon service members

4
HeavyVetting 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's 2021, everyone is a medical expert as long as they repeat what Fauci says.

42
25
LowKeyPede 25 points ago +26 / -1

This is Robert Kennedy Jr's website. He is phenomenal.

His new book is currently # 1 on Amazon and they are (supposedly) out of stock: The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

Amazon must be seething that this and Mercola's COVID books are best sellers...

9
Liberty49220 9 points ago +10 / -1

This is an excellent primer on the law governing mandates of an EUA vaccine. Seems very clear it is illegal. I wish the judge had entered an injunction. Thanks for posting.

2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +3 / -1

They cannot file an injunction until the mandate deadline happens just like with eviction debacle. Any injunction filed before deadline will be dismissed.

24
Baconb_breakfast 24 points ago +24 / -0

I’m glad that someone with decision making authority figured out that this a bait-and-switch.

5
Ilanna 5 points ago +5 / -0

However, they didn't approve the injunction to stop the DoD mandatory injections, and set the trial for almost a year from now.

13
PlayRunescape 13 points ago +13 / -0

"Specifically, if one is injured by an EUA vaccine, the only way to claim damages and receive compensation is to apply to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), an administrative process under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which authorized the vaccines.

This scheme potentially covers only unpaid medical expenses and lost wages and creates significant barriers for filing a vaccine injury lawsuit.

Notably, under 4% of claims made through this program have been compensated. To date, CICP has not compensated any claims for COVID-19 vaccine injuries."

Interesting.

5
Ilanna 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pfizer is also claiming that somehow the FDA approved vaccine still falls under this protection. How is beyond me, but hey....we no longer live in a country of with fair laws.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
RealTXPatriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

NOW... IF YOU WERE FORCED TO TAKE THIS SHIT AS A MILITARY ENLISTED OR OFFICER

YOU MUST SUE

SUE THEM FOR FRAUD. The negligence was malicious in nature.

9
JackWoods 9 points ago +10 / -1

If believe this was Robert Barns lawsuit

8
Panopticon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dear Tim Poole, we were right. There was a press release that said the two were interchangeable but the actual approval document listed differences.

2
Halfstache 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even the press release didn't really say they were interchangeable, although they did their best to make it look like they said so. It said that if you got the first EUA shot but not the second, then your first shot of the new one would count as the 2nd shot.

1
Panopticon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw one that made the claim but I didn't keep a copy. I think a lot of people did see it and the interchangeable narrative came out of it... But it was not the actual approval document... Which I also read.

7
OrangeElvis 7 points ago +8 / -1

Fuck YES!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
Damean1 6 points ago +6 / -0

The very fact that both exist tell you it's not interchangeable.

If Comirnaty were available, by the EUA's on rules, they would have to discontinue using and destroy all current doses of the current vaccine.

And they ain't doing that.

5
Chuj 5 points ago +5 / -0

Very good. If one is forced to get the vac, then say, ok I want the FDA approved one... Which is not available

4
randomusename 4 points ago +4 / -0

This was a Trump Judge -

On April 10, 2018, President Trump nominated Winsor to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. He was nominated to the seat vacated by Judge Robert Lewis Hinkle, who assumed senior status on November 7, 2016.[4] On May 23, 2018, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.[5] On June 14, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.[6]

On January 3, 2019, his nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate. On January 23, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to renominate Winsor for a federal judgeship.[7] His nomination was sent to the Senate later that day.[8] On February 7, 2019, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 12–10 vote.[9] On June 18, 2019, the Senate voted 54–42 to invoke cloture on his nomination.[10] On June 19, 2019, he was confirmed by a vote of 52–44. He received his judicial commission on June 21, 2019.

4
__I_dindu__nufin_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

DOD? Department of Doctors?

2
nomoreprinkles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Department of dementia

2
Bolo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big Mike be Dildoing Obama's Derrière

4
schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +4 / -0

The FDA doc literally calls them legally distinct products.

3
Jack_Burton 3 points ago +3 / -0

Civil suit? Falsely claiming a vaxx had EUA when it did not?

3
PonySoldier66 3 points ago +4 / -1

BOOM!

3
wolverineTEDDY 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't matter

97% of Federal employees have been vaccinated

Those who are logical and reject blind compliance have been fully purged

Draconian measures incoming by February 2022 at the latest

3
Winner45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most telling is that the claim was argued by the military, not Pfizer. Out tax money is paying for Pfizer’s legal claims, on top of the hundreds of billions we’re also giving them.

3
EADReddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nuremberg back on the menu boys!!

3
HeavyVetting 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course it's not fucking interchangeable, I look forward to more of the FDA's bullshit being shot down as soon as possible.

3
User_X 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, i could have told them that. One is mandated, authorized under emergency use and has no liability. The other is not being produced because it would remove the EUA and hold the drug manufacturers accountable.

3
Tcrlaf1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is everyone’s way out of this. I am not anti-Vax, but I am Opposed to being a Medical Test Subject.

2
Cop-Morty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tim Pool can go fuck himself.

2
KnightTemplar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Openly admits is still EUA

2
TheBestDuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, DoD will have to throw away their BioNTech stock and buy a whole new batch. Pfizer stockholders must be coming in their pants right about now.

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even attempting this is a GD joke. WTF!!

2
JustInTime2_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we have lawyer Pedes who can ELI5?

2
IntergalacticWalrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a ruling. As much as I wish it so.

2
KrellKrypto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nodes that mean ALL of the us military now has legal claims to sue the dod?

Sounds like the legal fallout of the vax will be the end of america to me

1
Women4Trump2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like the NWO would get their wish then

3
KrellKrypto 3 points ago +3 / -0

Na.

Things will turn around quick with good leadership.

From the ashes we will rebuild the American EMPIRE. Go back to what we were in the 1800s taking over countries.

Fate is cyclical

1
LightLurker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plz post the link. I went to read the full article and I can’t find it on their site :/

1
Women4Trump2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would but I came across this on /pol

1
mainsoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they are interchangeable, neither one actually works.