2949
Comments (958)
sorted by:
342
LetsGoBrand0n 342 points ago +345 / -3

Oh no, we have to fuck responsibly now!! Whatever will we do!!

204
ParticleCannon 204 points ago +206 / -2

Call it racist, probably.

103
vote_for_MAGA_2020 103 points ago +105 / -2

Also transphobic?

133
Libertas_Vel_Mors 133 points ago +134 / -1

Kek

On a serious note, the most likely scenario is that if Roe v. Wade is overturned, the decision will just go back to the states. States like Texas and Florida will outlaw it entirely, while New York and California will taxpayer-fund it up to birth.

I still want Roe v. Wade to die, though. Even if I was pro baby-murder, the decision was based on some of the world's shittiest logic and worst interpretation of law... ever. You don't get to pull a legal precedent out of your ass by way of "emanations" and "penumbras" of the 4th Amendment. The faggots in the USSC at the time should have been taken out back and beaten to death for that boner of a decision. At least the moral fuckup of Dred Scott had a logical basis in law to back it up.

70
I_Love_45-70_Gov 70 points ago +71 / -1

-- Cheif Justice Roberts has entered the chat...

63
Libertas_Vel_Mors 63 points ago +64 / -1

That faggot will just call it a tax.

24
I_Love_45-70_Gov 24 points ago +24 / -0

I was screaming at the tv while watching that asshat arguing for and rationalizing the absurd.

6
AZ-is-the-key 6 points ago +6 / -0

All he had to say was the aca was unconstitutional as written and send it back to congress. They'd have has to change the language from penalty fee or whatever the language was to tax and pass it again. They barely passed it in the dead of night on what was it, Christmas eve? After bribing several members of congress to barely pass it the first time, no way would it have passed a second time. Remember the gop picked up a bunch of senate seats and control of the house after the dems passed Obama care. They didn't have the votes.

16
Mooma 16 points ago +16 / -0

A baby tax, for Satan

2
FliesTheFlag 2 points ago +2 / -0

what that piece of shit called obungo care right? Fuck him and his illegal irish kids he got through brazil.

24
FormerGraveheart 24 points ago +24 / -0

Exactly. SCROTUS is still cucked, so we don't know what's going to happen here. I'd be surprised if it were overturned.

26
RiverRunnerVDB 26 points ago +26 / -0

Same here. I fully expect abortion to be upheld and the right to bear arms to be eliminated by these assholes.

33
RuprechtThaMonkeyBoy 33 points ago +33 / -0

Shooting someone attacking you is actually a late-term abortion.

10
gaijin_ronin 10 points ago +10 / -0

You have a right to kill but not a right to survive because logic.

6
zooty 6 points ago +6 / -0

One could argue it has been already. It says "shall not be infringed", not "subject to arbitrary restrictions".

5
TommyJarvis 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Roe V Wade is upheld but then extended to right to medical privacy for vaccines, though?

2
Happicakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would likely be the only positive, but given the arguments made RE government interest, it would be spotty.

2
ParadigmShift2070 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol you tried to apply consistency to scotus.

1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be even more surprising. Look at how almost every government on earth is trying to force that shit on their people. I don't think they'd just let that one go here.

5
I_Love_45-70_Gov 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same here

Everyone seems to think that it will be overturned; however, the SCROTUS is nothing more than a dysfunctional Star Chamber in its current configuration.

Hopefully justice will prevail, but hope should never play a part in the justice system.

3
HowManyLumpsDoYaWant 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Dread Justice Roberts.

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dred

2
HowManyLumpsDoYaWant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah, thanks.

14
NoCoupForYou 14 points ago +14 / -0

"Penumbra of Privacy", raised to the level of the 1st Amendment.

Totally ridiculous when the Government at all levels bans countless medical procedures, only this one not only can't be banned outright, but is subject to the highest protection thanks to Roe v. Wade.

13
Chopblock 13 points ago +13 / -0

Privacy — Medical Privacy, and Body Autonomy

Privacy is essential for freedom — and the entire stack of “abortion rights” also rest on it. This ruling will be all about getting rid of the privacy-based foundations for abortion, while preserving the practice of the procedure under some other auspices.

They can’t have their child sacrifice accidentally protect you from State needle-rape or medical records searches.

10
Post-it-votes-2 10 points ago +10 / -0

That has been one of my biggest worries in this case.

10
powershellder 10 points ago +10 / -0

Absolutely. It’s very suspicious it’s emerging again right now.

I don’t trust the court one bit, and I feel this will lead to more vaccine tyranny.

2
Nopa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sanest take Ive read

10
victory2024 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah it's a pretty weak "privacy right" that apparently only applies to killing babies, gay sex, and birth control.

4
conservativeyuppie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't we even ban the import of those f'in kinder eggs for "health reasons"?

1
VirPopulus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, those things are awesome.

12
OrangeElvis 12 points ago +12 / -0

Thank you. Sanity. I have had the argument over the tortured "justification" of RvW for decades. I am not an attorney, but one doesn't need to be to read the Constitution and see that "right to privacy" in no way equates to killing your unborn child.

Conversely our right to privacy is fuck-all when it comes to mandating science juice getting stabbed into us. There is literally no medical, legal or logical distinction of mandating a leaky "vax" vs ordering you to surrender a kidney to save some rich dude.

2
Nopa 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about the government recording every electronic communication of every american for nearly 20 years. What the fuck are they doing with that shit?

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Roe v Wade did not involve the right to privacy

it involved the right against excessive government regulation regarding health choices

8
OrangeElvis 8 points ago +8 / -0

you are intitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. There are literally hundreds of articles in a simple google search: https://healtheducationresources.unesco.org/library/documents/roe-v-wade-and-right-privacy

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

correct. the stare decisis was Griswold v Connecticut, establishing a constitutional right to privacy regarding contraception

-6
ufkyflflfguio -6 points ago +2 / -8

Whether you like it or not, your unborn child is not a citizen, nor is it considered a person at all by the law.

7
Frog_Anne 7 points ago +7 / -0

But killing a pregnant woman results in two counts of homicide, at least in some states, so by law the unborn child is considered a person.

Unless the mother decides she doesn't feel like taking responsibility for her actions, whereupon it suddenly becomes a "clump of cells" that can be removed without a second thought.

-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yes, government is retarded. So why do you want a bunch of retards to make rules about what medical procedures you are allowed to undergo?

3
OrangeElvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow - you should get this hot take to Scott Peterson's attorneys.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just read the Constitution. It uses words like "birth" and "born." You have to be born to be a citizen.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are correct. but, that has nothing to do with it.

this is a states rights issue . If Roe vs Wade is overturned in no way will the practice of abortion be illegal.

You think california, new york etc are going to ban it?

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Things are only states' rights issues if they first do not violate the rights of the citizens. Individuals sovereignty comes first.

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does citizenship have to do with it? Is it legal to murder non-citizens?

0
ufkyflflfguio 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is it legal to kill cows?

1
VirPopulus 1 point ago +2 / -1

You forget to suck your boyfriend's dick this morning, faggot?

-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not an argument.

5
based_trekkie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Roe v. Wade was a big fucking VIOLATION of the 10th Amendment!

MISSING PERIOD!

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, why people don’t get this most important fact

4
Weallseethetruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Right... States rights only matters when it's their cause!!

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sanctuary states? That's different because shut up

2
Weallseethetruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because feelings!! My feelings mean more than yours, but mine will change with whatever the public I'm told in general also agree with!! So 🤡!!!!

12
InarosPrime 12 points ago +12 / -0

But trans people can't get pregnant, right?

8
Joejoeandthehoehoe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Only in clown world

5
newuser999 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, they can now actually. Which is why employers need to recognize male paternity leave now

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was an article about one going to Brazil or something to get a uterus transplant. No idea if that happened or if they got impregnated.

2
IthoughtIwalked 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even with a uterus implantation, the body needs a total physiologic response to support a pregnancy and get ready to deliver the child. I still don't see these trannies with spare parts in them actually conceiving and having children.

1
Mythnutbill 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even IF they get such a freakish and abominable procedure done, I don't see how it would, A) not be rejected by the body, and B) if it weren't rejected, I fail to see how any zygote would make it through the 1st couple weeks, let alone carried to term. There's so many hormones involved, along with the mothers CNS interacting with the uterus... there's just no way it would ever work. Males lack the brain processes and genetic capability to grow and coordinate the resources to an organ as foreign as the uterus.

XX vs XY is a hard biological fact and activist trannies and their hypersensitive supporters need to be slapped with that truth repeatedly and ridiculed mercilessly out of the public sphere.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

But trans people can't get pregnant, right?

TRANSPHOBE!

8
jennyfrutex 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm old enough to remember when leftists screeched "no uterus, no opinion." Of course, now they've painted themselves into a corner in that regard.

3
Mintap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Men need to get abortions TOO!

1
TommyJarvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still haven't cleared out all the food I ate for Thanksgiving. Can I get a butt-bortion?

2
Mintap 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are going to need a D&E. I prescribe 3 tall cups of prune juice over the next 12 hours.

7
jennyfrutex 7 points ago +7 / -0

No one could possible be more racist than Margaret Sanger.

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

Karl Marx has entered the chat

2
jennyfrutex 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stand corrected

79
Viewer01 79 points ago +79 / -0

And just like that, millions of women were labeled murderers. Lmao I don’t have a strong opinion either way, but watching liberal women melt down over this will be glorious.

44
CrispyQuesoSalami 44 points ago +44 / -0

Liberal women and the white knight beta ximales that think they'll get laid if they share in the outrage.

13
Libertas_Vel_Mors 13 points ago +13 / -0

...with the usual results - the bulls get laid, but this time they'll have to settle for oral.

8
BigIgloo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh the whorrror!

3
Gadsen1440 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not trying to flex but a few weeks ago I pounded out some beta's girlfriend. I vaguely know who he is, picture the epitome of a twitter warrior (open mouth wojak). I am so tempted to send him the pic I took of my ding dong in his girlfriends bum. I am telling this story because any and all females dating these types of "men" are dying for a real man.

8
Axiom502 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't forget the reels of faggot actors whining about it coming soon

2
CrispyQuesoSalami 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their misery sustains me...can't wait.

14
deleted 14 points ago +35 / -21
25
War_Hamster 25 points ago +28 / -3

If your biggest concern is getting rid of mandates, which is a justifiable concern, then getting Dems out of power in 2022 has to be a priority.

Overturning Roe makes that more of a challenge, while also saving a lot of babies' lives.

The Left would love to have 2022 be all about "muh body muh choice"....only their version, of course.

30
GrayManNumber333 30 points ago +31 / -1

They have never won an election on it. Like the gay shit, it’s all been done only in courts by complete fiat. Karen’s and satanists are the only ones who care about it.

16
War_Hamster 16 points ago +16 / -0

Terry Schilling is on War Room reporting that the crowd outside of SCOTUS is about 90/10 in favor of Pro Life, which is an interesting observation.

15
GrayManNumber333 15 points ago +15 / -0

Pro lifers have won many elections. Why people think talking about it or winning on it is bad, really shows something evil is afoot.

14
Bubbahax 14 points ago +14 / -0

Rush used to say that he was constantly berated by 'moderate' Republicans because he was anti abortion. When he would go to parties or gatherings those guys (and especially their wives) would lay into him about how we needed to get away from the pro life crowd because they didn't want to be associated with hicks and hayseeds from the rural areas. Let the pro abortionists be Democrats.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Right now, overturning Roe v Wade would infuse energy into Biden's failing base and allow the media to change the narrative away from the Biden failings.

It's going to be a Red Wave anyways, and it's way past time to overturn that awful SCOTUS decision, it's just going to be loud with the Reeeeeeeees.

2
Frog_Anne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. There are many things that politicians compromise on so they can win, but there comes a point when people have to admit that we're allowing a great evil to be done in our country. It isn't right to turn a blind eye to the murder of innocents for possible political gain.

4
Ocineaa 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah I heard that too. Must be some bad info that'll come out if Soros et al haven't got a bunch of paid protestors there.

1
Libertas_Vel_Mors 1 point ago +1 / -0

I worry about that too

9
NoCoupForYou 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, banning school prayer outright, instituting Gay Marriage that couldn't pass democratically (even by direct referendum in Cali just a decade ago), etc.

Jefferson always said it would be the branch doing the first and worst mischief.

4
Nimblenavigator1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Force them to run on their perceived social issues, because I don’t think they realize just how fringe their takes actually are to the average person.

2
GrayManNumber333 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep.

12
Aoikaze2000 12 points ago +12 / -0

If they do that, then we should demand that whatever applies for abortion should apply for Covid and watch them explode.

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legitimate government interest in public health is their wedge

-31
deleted -31 points ago +3 / -34
28
SecedeNOW 28 points ago +30 / -2

Why does somebody else have to take responsibility for the consequences of someone else's decisions? We can just make murder of the unborn illegal and leave the adoption issue alone, they are 2 separate issues.

-41
deleted -41 points ago +6 / -47
27
TeeBP 27 points ago +28 / -1

If not killing babies means I'm basking in my greatness then I must be pretty damn great.

18
Jack_Burton 18 points ago +18 / -0

You should go see the stats for adoption. The majority are religious people.

You have some hate boner for religion, but millions of people don’t have to die to satisfy your personal vendetta against eternal judgment

15
Libertas_Vel_Mors 15 points ago +15 / -0

Hell of an argument to justify infanticide (which, incidentally, is not just a religious prohibition.)

11
Faulkner 11 points ago +11 / -0

Because you create a problem when you make abortion illegal

Go ahead and point to some examples of legal abortion being made illegal, and the problems this caused.

why, as a person that doesn't care if people blend a human to escape responsibility

?

now have to pay more in taxes to support the incoming foster care support for all these kids being left?

Being left? You mean not being killed?

While you stupid fucking religious faggots bask in your greatness and continue to do nothing.

I don't pretend to have any idea what you mean by "bask in your greatness," but we're not doing nothing. We're bringing people back to the realization that infanticide is and should be unlawful.

7
Deadpoolnormiefan271 7 points ago +8 / -1

You sound like you should have been aborted. Good thing it’s not too late for you to change that.

13
Libertas_Vel_Mors 13 points ago +13 / -0

Check out the waiting list for adoption sometime. It's many years long and costs tens of thousands of dollars to complete - which is often enough to drive couples into adopting overseas kids.

-24
deleted -24 points ago +1 / -25
15
Libertas_Vel_Mors 15 points ago +15 / -0

Has nothing to do with my feelings - you forget that it's not about virtue-signaling on this side of the ideological divide. Murder is either illegal at all ages and stages, or it's perfectly legal at all ages and stages. Equal protection under the law, or no protection.

4
Luminia5 4 points ago +4 / -0

What's with your God obsession, dude? People don't usually have kids, or adopt kids, to feel "godly" lol. Have you realized that the Christian God lives in your head rent free? And you don't even go to church! 🤣 You didn't even have to go to church but your thoughts are always with your Lord and Master...it's kind of weird right? You sort of remind me of a little kitten, spitting, hissing, and tapping with their little fragile claws. You're angry, and you're trying really hard to say things that might be found offensive to religious people here...except it all ends up being cute instead of ferocious.

5
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 5 points ago +5 / -0

One. She's now 6 and thriving.

4
Frog_Anne 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is a waiting list to adopt babies, and that's even with the enormous cost involved, all paid by the hopeful parents.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
13
Trumpwon306 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's almost like the lives of 60 Million dead babies weighs heavily on us.

Vaccine Mandates are also inhuman and a violation of nature, but one thing after a another no?

Anyways here's another bimbo republican that poses with guns and does nothing, go vote for her <3

-19
deleted -19 points ago +1 / -20
13
BigIgloo 13 points ago +13 / -0

You don't have to house Anne Frank yourself to believe the Holocaust was evil.

9
Jack_Burton 9 points ago +9 / -0

Broken record

BuT mUh FoSTEr HomEs!

8
Trumpwon306 8 points ago +8 / -0

what are you even talking about?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
-28
deleted -28 points ago +4 / -32
19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
15
Jack_Burton 15 points ago +15 / -0

Prime example of why the Right needs a worldview filter. Acceptance of infanticide should be instant disqualification from our view of citizenship

11
Antisocialdilemma 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exactly right. I notice donkey teeth up there tries to use moral arguments(think of the orphans) to promote murdering babies without hesitation. Doesn't want to come right out and call it what it is though. I wonder if he's ever been in the room as they keep the baby alive just long enough to harvest the organs for sale. Also doesn't or won't admit to understanding that before roe vs wade the societal shame prevented widespread unwed pregnancy. And that was partly the point of it: to promote moral decline. When a society turns their back on God it isn't long before they descend into deviancy and eventually pure evil and hatred.

7
nickybops 7 points ago +7 / -0

U so damn mad its hilarious

6
Bubbahax 6 points ago +6 / -0

Made the account two months ago and has spent that time almost exclusively attacking other people on the site. We see you, asshole.

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
11
Bubbahax 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nice try, Mr 'joined 71 days ago'.

1
Luminia5 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seem to believe that a dead child is a happier child. Care to comment? You lived in countries that tried their best to feed and shelter children who didn't have loving families? You must have been traumatized by the civility of it! Are you saying we should just kill all those foster babies? Because...you're so incoherent and illogical, it's very difficult for me to actually understand what you're proposing. You're mostly just pitching a bitch-fit and showing everyone your ass without realizing it....but are you actually suggesting that killing them would be better than trying to feed them after they're born?

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
2
Luminia5 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol you don't have any answers to me. 🤣 All you got is "psycho cat lady"? 🤣 You didn't have answers for the point about the Catholic church's apparent foster care and orphanage charities, or the comment about religious people adopting more than non-religious people do...all of these points just waiting for your refutation. You're spewing shit all over this comment section that you can't back up yet you're requesting that I stop spewing mine? I'm going to needle you until you fucking defend your regurgitated drivel. Because I think you're incapable, and I'd like to find out if I'm right. You have no limpid or cogent replies for any of these people who have tried to engage with you. You just call them religious faggots without any indication of their religious values, or lack there of. I think you're a fucking twat with one recorded catchphrase, and you can't defend it when other people demonstrate its fragility.

10
Jack_Burton 10 points ago +10 / -0

“Let’s just keep killing children for the sake of relevancy”

-this ass

4
Faulkner 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean, I agree that companies obeying "mandates" which aren't laws and don't legally exist to force their employees to take untested injections are a more pressing problem, but SCOTUS doesn't work on a schedule of what is most pressing.

12
ThatsDoable 12 points ago +12 / -0

I didn't have a strong opinion on it until my daughter was born. Not only just born. But born early.

It dawned on me that in some states she could have been legally killed before birth and I would have had no say in the matter. A sweet innocent child who wants to be held murdered by the people it was closest to.

9
tflst5 9 points ago +9 / -0

Same for me, seeing videos of my first daughter in the womb - playing with her hair and kicking her feet. Then a few weeks later when she was born, i watched her do the same exact things outside of the womb. Clearly she was alive inside the womb, and it would have been murder to abort her then.

8
Retard_Strength 8 points ago +8 / -0

this is the reason leftists hate any attempt to require abortion centers to show an ultrasound of the baby to the mother.

6
IAmNotAnAutist 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm the same way about rape and murder.

It's none of my business what someone else does with another person's body.

5
Philhelm 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same.

22
NotAPuma 22 points ago +22 / -0

They'll have to stop Worshipping Satan with their Child Sacrifices.

10
Aoikaze2000 10 points ago +10 / -0

Watch as the African American community starts to make a huge comeback now that they aren't murdering themselves into oblivion?

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't buy it. Black women shit out babies for the gibs at record pace now.

So do hispanics.

The only ones really diminished by abortion are whites. White culture embraces abortion the most.

13
Aoikaze2000 13 points ago +13 / -0

IIRC, more blacks were aborted in NYC than born for the last several years. When you can commit infanticide at will, it allows for people to become psychopathic towards kids. The impact that has on black society by forcing these black women to carry the baby to term is going to start giving black men the tools they need to start rebuilding a lot of black society that has been completely wrecked thanks to the DemoKKKrats subjugating them through social programs designed to keep them permanently enslaved. If the government tendrils can be exorcised, that segment of the population will normalize with the rest and we'll start getting higher caliber blacks.

At least that's the long term hope as I hope all of my fellow Americans can strive to be better than the last generation.

7
TommyJarvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

I could not agree more with you. The cultural rot that has grown from the one-two punch of legalized abortion and no-fault divorce that the communists pressed into law here in America is going to take generations to clean out.

2
Aoikaze2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

We've got to start by ensuring the next generation actually exists, and then showing them why and how their parents screwed them up so that some will learn and then fix themselves. The ship will right itself over time... but we've got to stop pumping water BACK into it.

3
MasklessMarvel [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

nah, they will still be slaughtering each other in the streets

more blacks means more competition for territory which means more murders

nature has a way of maintaining a balance

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Overturning Roe vs Wade will not automatically outlaw abortion, but push it back to the states.

Blacks who live in left leaning areas will still get to kill their babies

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a step in the right direction, as forcing it to a state level means it can be purged from the right leaning states... or at least start to be purged. Either way, it helps move the Overton Window back to where it should be.

9
thepalagoon 9 points ago +9 / -0

I mean, at this point I'd settle for society encouraging any personal responsibility.

These goddamn losers need a wake up call. If they think it's gonna stop here, it's not. They've pushed the Overton Window so far to the goddamn left they're gonna be shocked when it goes back to the middle.

203
Shalomtoyou 203 points ago +203 / -0

If you're a woman that wants an abortion, and abortion is outlawed in your state, there's still an option available.

You can take the vaccine.

77
slag 77 points ago +77 / -0

holy shit

6
chelthing 6 points ago +6 / -0

🔥🌶️🥵

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
chelthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guaranteed there's at least one woman who'll wear a shirt with both

14
Julia_J 14 points ago +14 / -0

By that logic, she can murder other children as well.

12
surfdad64 12 points ago +12 / -0

kek

11
spee 11 points ago +11 / -0

oh baby, that got me good.

1
QLARP 1 point ago +2 / -1

They would have to make a new branch of government like the atf, Dea

To stop underground abortion clinics.

185
segmentation_fault 185 points ago +187 / -2

SCOTUS is gonna fuck this up like they fuck everything up. ACB and Kavanaugh have been such disappointments.

78
RolandDelacroix 78 points ago +88 / -10

ACB is a modern weak Christian bitch. She probably prays to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit of Margaret Sanger, like the vast majority of American women.

26
Drainthecommies 26 points ago +27 / -1

Nah she’s just been paid off. Needed money to feed all those kids.

21
RuralRedPill 21 points ago +22 / -1

This is the problem with electing judges too young, they look for book deals to grift off their position and now they are beholden to a publisher threatening to pull their book rather than side with true justice for the American people.

13
Drainthecommies 13 points ago +13 / -0

Book deals shouldn’t be allowed until they have retired.

11
joebama-smells 11 points ago +11 / -0

They should be grounds for immediate retiring. What's the point of a lifetime position if they're sitting there grifting ffs. Clown World.

5
Canlog96 5 points ago +5 / -0

Book deals by high level members of government while still serving are a threat to national security anyways. Who knows what they’ll accidentally spill?

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

she was not elected she was appointed

-1
tflst5 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Shes an evangelical.. basically Christian passivists. They've been shown the book, and taught what is right or wrong.. but the idea that they cannot intervene and cannot battle evil is ingrained in their heads from day 1. Thank the 700 club for that bullshit

5
Forbidden_outcast 5 points ago +5 / -0

She Catholic. A weird type of Catholic, but a Catholic.

-4
jebbush123 -4 points ago +10 / -14

sanger is great. idk why cuckservatives hate her.

she did more to preserve the demographics of the country than anyone else. demographics = destiny. remember that.

6
vote_for_MAGA_2020 6 points ago +8 / -2

Based

5
ObongoForPrison2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

.Win will hate you for spreading this truth, but I don't.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-28
KingOfTards -28 points ago +4 / -32

You fit in with the clowns at Reddit. They hate ACB and Kav.

EDIT: You went and downvoted all my comments. Hahaha you are a Reddit clown

28
vote_for_MAGA_2020 28 points ago +30 / -2

FFS, ACB talked about how she cried with her black adopted daughter from another country over George Floyd. She emasculated her husband several times an live TV. Pointing out that she is a closet liberal doesn’t make one a liberal dude!!!

17
RuralRedPill 17 points ago +17 / -0

Trump should have pulled her nomination on hearing that response from her. ACB should have told her daughter with not a tear in sight that Floyd was a career criminal that put a gun to the stomach of a pregnant woman and forfeited his life at that moment, that he died breaking the law and not cooperating because he was overdosing on drugs. White woman guilt is the most unattractive thing on the planet.

-15
KingOfTards -15 points ago +2 / -17

You are so triggered. Gotta do the lefty downvote of all comments. What a clown. I'm gonna buy you a big portrait of ACB and Kav. Roe vs Wade is over. You won't be able to kill babies you sack of afterbirth

13
vote_for_MAGA_2020 13 points ago +14 / -1

User name checks out

-6
KingOfTards -6 points ago +1 / -7

Haha How many accounts does an opinionated cuck need to rage downvote dissent? You cir are a faggot

-15
KingOfTards -15 points ago +1 / -16

She interpretes the constitution and her being liberal and not a biased activist justice is why the radical left hates her.

8
BeijingJoeHastoGo 8 points ago +9 / -1

Username checks out.

30
TommyJarvis 30 points ago +31 / -1

Agreed. This is EXACTLY why they went full retard on Kavanaugh. They successfully intimidated him. ACB is pro abortion, Roberts is just a line item democrat.

21
vote_for_MAGA_2020 21 points ago +22 / -1

I was ridiculed, harrassed, insulted, and generally shit on by my fellow pedes when I tried to point out that ACB was a traitor.

20
Deadpoolnormiefan271 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yep most people still trying to understand red vs blue is a illusion and it’s really us vs uniparty.

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +4 / -3

That has absolutely nothing to do with it.

There are people here who just want to exploit the downvote features of social media when they encounter unpopular opinions. It gives them dopamine to downvote hard truth on a Donald Trump forum for some reason.

That’s it. Full stop.

It’s more frequent lately because there appears to be an influx of immature users from somewhere.

It has zero to do with your wanting to hate either party and everything to do with childish emotion.

If you cant stand being downvoted for sharing unpopular opinions then the internet is probably not the place you want to be spending a lot of time.

8
Brakesbreaktrains2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not just black babies

Adopted Haitian babies

.... totally legit I'm sure. No possible ties with one of the most corrupt countries on earth

2
SickofItall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who do you think would have been a better pick? I'm not busting balls, I'm asking seriously. It seems all of these fucks are easily gotten to. The days of the Clarence Thomas type are over.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
vote_for_MAGA_2020 9 points ago +10 / -1

This is my thought. They wouldn’t dare do anything to overturn Roe v Wade. They’re fucking cowards

4
WhoMeTwo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This.

5
Mr_Beanths 5 points ago +5 / -0

ACB might actually vote to overturn so she can adopt another virtue signaled black kid for her family. Since the babies won’t be murdered anymore and all.

1
WhoMeTwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of them to adopt right now.

2
deleted 2 points ago +11 / -9
89
The_Gay_Deceiver 89 points ago +90 / -1

lmao that threat

They'll reeeeeee on twitter and Soros' posse and blacks will riot in liberal shitholes. But they're going to do that anyway about one thing or another, so we're not losing anything.

Dilate, faggots.

28
War_Hamster 28 points ago +28 / -0

And just like that......Waukesha who? Ghislane Maxwell who?

7
bubadmt 7 points ago +7 / -0

⭐ 💲 WAUKESHA TYRESHA LATISHA "CASH MONEY" JACKSON 💲 ⭐

2
NADSAQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is already a rap song called Wakesha but it’s about drug addiction

3
GlacialSpeed 3 points ago +3 / -0

This.

When you see new headlines always consider that it's not always about what they want you to see, but what they want you to NOT see.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's almost as if our collective memory can only focus on one story at a time....

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

so ALL other court activity should stop for each trial with potential political impact

else it is a "smokescreen"

7
SirWompalot 7 points ago +7 / -0

I just say "Bring it bitches."

Start your revolution so this thing goes hot already.

3
BillionsAndBillions 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't think of a more righteous cause than fighting a revolution against satanic leftists wanting to murder millions of innocent children.

2
QLARP 2 points ago +6 / -4

It's not a false threat. They will riot, drive into parades, set up underground abortion clinics.

You are making the mistake of thinking they are as weak as you are.

1
The_Gay_Deceiver 1 point ago +2 / -1

I said they would riot. But you're forgetting that self-defense recently got a nod from the courts.

I didn't say people should just take the riots laying down.

-2
QLARP -2 points ago +1 / -3

Lmaooooo

1
tflst5 1 point ago +2 / -1

I would gladly accept this outcome. Stopping abortion is huge for our country. Its finally a step backwards on the march into oblivion - we haven't gotten many of those. It may become a turning point if these liberal idiots take their backlash too far - which they are prone to do.

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +2 / -3

To inforce anti abortion laws they will set up a new agency like the ATF or DEA

But for swat teams on underground abortion clinics.

They will have unlimited powers on warrantless searches on medical records to see if the baby died from a womb bleed or an illegal abortion.

It's the patriot act all over again.

You are clapping for your doom like an autistic seal.

57
TDS_Consultant 57 points ago +58 / -1

Look at the shebeast abortion advocates vs. the women holding heartbeat signs in the picture.

24
MasklessMarvel [S] 24 points ago +24 / -0

how come women who support abortion are women no one would want to impregnate?

13
TexasPiper 13 points ago +13 / -0

If they can’t have a baby, no one can

5
ImVoting4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the leftist mantra as a whole. It’s why so many of them want communism despite knowing full well it destroys nations and kills people. Because they’re all losers living in their parents homes at 35, and if they can’t make anything of their lives, no one else should be able to either.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

So low down, if they were single mothers, the number would have to go negative.

41
bubadmt 41 points ago +44 / -3

I don't really care much on the abortion issue as I do about 2A cases or COVID mandate cases, but I'd love to see RVW overturned, or at the very least, stricter abortion laws upheld just to see the meltdowns.

29
IAmNotAnAutist 29 points ago +35 / -6

Yeah, who gives a fk about a million innocents a year slaughtered in the most vile ways.

Priorities!

9
UpTrump 9 points ago +12 / -3

I don't understand why we want to overturn something that will result in millions of democrat voters and speed up the process of losing our country

5
BurgerChef90 5 points ago +6 / -1

It won’t result in millions of democrat voters. Nearly everyone who supports RvW are already democrats. There won’t be many “switching” to democrats.

Besides, all overturning it would do is turning it back to the states, where it should be anyways.

8
ufkyflflfguio 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, the people that have abortions are Democrats. Force them to have those kids, and they will raise Democrat kids.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

They won't just have the kids, man, that's their giant straw man.

They will instead start using condoms instead of using abortion as their birth control.

This is not about a woman's right to choose whether or not to have a child. They can already make that choice by not being cum dumpsters.

This is really about a woman's right to have unprotected sex without having to face the consequences of her actions. That's the reality here.

It's never been about children or health. It has always been about hedonism.

So yes, limiting that hedonism is a good thing. Forcing society to have some discipline instead of literally murdering children is a decidedly good thing.

Girls that grow up understanding that every action has consequences don't become liberal idiots in the first place.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will instead start using condoms instead of using abortion as their birth control.

People using self control because of a law? Come on, don't make me fucking laugh. Do laws against drugs stop drug use?

This is really about a woman's right to have unprotected sex without having to face the consequences of her actions.

Ok and why is that not a right, exactly? Why do you want to force consequences on them for having unprotected sex? Why is it your business? Live how you want to live, and let others live how they want to live. Stop being a leftist.

So yes, limiting that hedonism is a good thing. Forcing society to have some discipline instead of literally murdering children is a decidedly good thing.

No, forcing people to obey you, or Jesus, or Donald Trump, or Joe Biden, is NEVER a good thing. Forcing people is pure evil, always and forever.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do laws against drugs stop drug use?

What an awful analogy. Drugs don't require a trained physician to enable their use. Drugs are addictive. Drugs don't require medical care after their use. Drugs don't have a dead body to get rid of. Drugs aren't incredibly risky to the user if used while alone. The risk from drug use is incredibly low and the perceived reward is very high, so laws don't stop it, but yes, they absolutely do lower the prevalence of usage. By how much is debatable, but the risk of punishment absolutely lowers the number of users. Regardless of that factor, they're two entirely different subjects. Abortion requires infrastructure. If it's illegal, you get back alley abortion clinics and coat hanger abortions, neither of which are very safe and the people risking pregnancy know it, so yes they will decide to just put on a condom instead.

Ok and why is [having unprotected sex without having to face the consequences of her actions] not a right, exactly?

Are you seriously asking why people have to face consequences for their choices? Because we live in the real world and not a magical fairy land, man. Actions have consequences. Someone will face the consequences of those actions, positive or negative. Abortion doesn't make those consequences disappear, it just shifts the burden onto the baby instead. The baby now faces the consequence and is punished with death.

Why do you want to force consequences on them for having unprotected sex?

I don't. I'm not the one forcing those consequences. Evolution did that. If you let some dude cum inside you, then you get pregnant. That's not my rule, that's just how biology works.

Why is it your business?

Same reason preventing rape, murder, and pedophilia are my business. We protect the weak and innocent among us from those who would prey on them. No one is more innocent than an unborn child.

Live how you want to live, and let others live how they want to live.

The irony of this statement in regards to your position on the subject is possibly the thickest I have ever encountered. I agree. Let the baby live. Who are we to interfere in its life?

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

The babies born into democrat families (anyone who wants an abortion) will almost for sure vote democrat all their lives

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you saying with absolute confidence that there would be NO increase in birth rates as a result of banning abortion?

You realize that abortion is the only thing keeping orc populations in check, right?

1
BurgerChef90 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, I know there will be an increase in birth rates, and an increase in children born to parents who don't want them and abuse them.

But I still don't like abortion. Even if it does prevent child abuse, and keeps the orc population in check.

1
Boom2cannon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think there are plenty of pro choice Republicans. It’s just not high on their list of priorities.

You are 100% right about it going back to the states though. Everything should be moved back to the states.

5
tflst5 5 points ago +5 / -0

It will result in more mothers and less, bitter, baby-killing feminists. It may force the black community to start valuing 2 parent families again. That would be the quickest way for them to rebound.

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +1 / -1

lmao orc society can't even stop shooting people for scuffing their shoes.

4
JoesMole 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, cuckservatives are all about that moral high ground when in reality is them on a massive circle jerk while doing absolutely nothing to fix the problem.

This will backfire massively, can you imagine this country with 20-30 million more joggers on the welfare system.

At least the decision should be left to the states that way Democrats can continue to genocide themselves

1
Gregorina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Iannotanautist may be Christian that teaches all men are made in the image of God and should be respected and valued regardless of how stupid they are

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, who gives a fk about a million innocents a year slaughtered in the most vile ways.

I unironically want to throw shitlibs from helicopters, the fuck do you think I care about the morality of a fetus.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
559throw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I don't care either. They're not my children and there are plenty of unwanted children out there already that aren't taken care of. But it shouldn't be a Federal issue regardless because nowhere in the Constitution is the govt given the power to control it.

7
TommyJarvis 7 points ago +9 / -2

Oh no, abortion is a national tragedy. Overturn that moronic decision. You want to live in a state that kills babies, go ahead. It’s that simple.

5
Patriots_dont_kneel 5 points ago +10 / -5

Make abortion illegal, and the country will be majority non-white the next day. We hardly abort compared to them. If it wasn't for abortion, the black population would be double or triple its current number. I think its icky from a moral standpoint, but not as icky as genociding my own people and becoming another South Africa.

3
SheikFromMozambake 3 points ago +3 / -0

I appreciate patriots.win for allowing difficult discussions like this one to occur. I don't want any kind of genocide but I think there's a similar color-blind issue here. Abortion is disproportionately used as birth control by those of lower socioeconomic status. Whenever abortion is restricted, at least initially, we should expect to see an increase in births among the welfare classes. In the long term, that's politically dangerous for conservative principles and the country. I applaud the MAGA community for standing on principles but fear some of the consequences. Instead of subsidizing abortions, perhaps the government should be aggressively subsidizing birth control.

3
Build_Back_Bankrupt 3 points ago +3 / -0

These are points that are lost on most people, also interesting that you didn't raise the issue of the increase in violent crime that will come as a result of abolishing abortion. 18-20 years after RvW there was a drop in violent crime across the nation that left people scratching their heads.

My problem with the conservatives who want to outright abolish abortion is that they have no plan beyond that to address the droves of unwanted children being born into poor socio-economic circumstances, which I would argue is almost as cruel as abortion itself. It isn't going to force people to be more responsible. No, there needs to be some sort of plan or policies that give the unwanted children born a fair shot in life, and don't get it twisted, there will be blue states that will put bans in place in order to force more voters be born into the welfare system that they will undoubtedly enhance to accommodate the irresponsible behavior that cannot be corrected.

No shit, if they ban abortion then a two year stint in civil services or the military should be compulsory for everyone at age 18.

2
Post-it-votes-2 2 points ago +2 / -0

They already are. Free condoms plus free/ heavily subsidized hormonal birth control are readily available, especially if you have insurance.

0
Inquisitor_Corvus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Free at your local Health Department!

2
tflst5 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not exactly true. The black community would be more Conservative, since mothers tend to lean right. It might also trigger an era of less promiscuity... since there is no longer an easy out for getting pregnant.

2
WhoMeTwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

You haven't met any leftist white women, have you?

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

overturning Roe vs Wade won’t outlaw abortion though

1
Patriots_dont_kneel 1 point ago +1 / -0

It will reduce accessibility to abortion significantly. Many baby momas will make the decision to just have the baby and collect welfare rather than fly two states over and back for an abortion. Expect a significant increase in welfare queens in that case.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

they are not overturning Roe v Wade

this decision will not end abortion

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sadly I think you're right. Kavanaugh and Roberts especially will fag out.

ACB I expected the fagout from already.

Probably will be just Thomas and Alito standing tall and proud in the eyes of God.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

no, seriously

the case just lets the states make the restrictions instead of the feds

i am sure commie hives like NY will continue to allow partial birth abortions

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

Question: How do you feel about helicopter rides for communists?

1
TommyJarvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m PRO

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

if someone played it right, they could use Roe v Wade as an argument against mandates

the whole case is about preventing excessive government restrictions on health decisions

abortion is just an instance it was based on

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could also make the case that Roe vs Wade paves the way for federal vaccine mandates.

The case is about state rights, more than abortion

2
Wordlife187 2 points ago +3 / -1

Covid mandates outweigh children being slaughtered?

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

They would have to make a new branch of government like the atf, Dea

To stop underground abortion clinics.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

right

we need another drug war

1
QLARP 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh no, the last one just took away the 4th amendment.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

the bad news is that most "underground abortion clinics" were doctor's offices

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you need a dea or arf type agency to stop them.

1
bubadmt 1 point ago +1 / -0

The cunt enforcement task force.

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yup and that new department of homeland security will never abuse their warrant powers to review medical records.

I mean we need someone to inforce anti abortion laws so we should give this branch of the doj powers to do warrantless searches to stop abortions.

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

Let's call it the patriot act

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federal government cannot ban abortion, it would be up to each state.

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not if roe VA wade gets overturned.

2
ufkyflflfguio 2 points ago +2 / -0

Overturning Roe v Wade would make it a state by state issue.

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

So how would you know if it's a miscarriage or abortion after it's made illegal?

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

The states where it would become illegal are mostly states with 0 income tax. In order to pay for the police state required to do these investigations and enforce the law, they would need to institute an income tax. I'm sure Texans won't mind that at all, amirite?

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

Fuck off shill!

38
Mrsattorney 38 points ago +39 / -1

It is young people who have changed their minds on abortion because of the more sophisticated technology that shows how developed a child is in the early weeks of pregnancy. Their first baby picture is their ultrasound.

19
ShadowInv 19 points ago +20 / -1

Abortion took away 60 million black kids. The black community would be insanely larger in America, but abortion stole their future.

18
deleted 18 points ago +26 / -8
3
Blackmode 3 points ago +4 / -1

LOL

2
IAmNotAnAutist 2 points ago +3 / -1

There you go, look at the bright side!

2
JoesMole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aborting gave us a fighting chance. We should be doubling or tripling the clinics in their area,

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

no they won't

they will just kill each other in greater numbers

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

Good

5
KlunniClowns 5 points ago +5 / -0

You just hit the red hot 777 jackpot with that comment.

0
ufkyflflfguio 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why isn't it enough for you to not abort your own kids? Leave other people alone. Their decisions on abortion don't affect you.

1
ersh 1 point ago +2 / -1

One of the most precise reasons conservatism can't make any headway: religious people

0
ufkyflflfguio 0 points ago +1 / -1

Plenty of religious people understand the "leave people alone" concept. There's something deeper going on. Some people, religious or not, just cannot leave others alone.

35
EllemenoP 35 points ago +36 / -1

We'll have to use birth control instead of murder? Whaaaaa??? No fair-zeez.

''Revolution' my ass. Your eugenics cult has been well under way since Margaret Sanger first inspired Hitler. Read a damn history book leftards.

YOU are the baddies!

28
deleted 28 points ago +29 / -1
4
KingOfTards 4 points ago +6 / -2

Once they lose ability to sacrifice innocents to their Satan, let's see what evils they do next. My guess is some disease or major war. They know if the US moves forward, other countries will do the same.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
stormybanks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Transgender kids and normalizing pedophilia are already in the works. Next, forcefully separating children from their parents with pandemic quarantine camps? Arresting parents for being terrorists at school board meetings. Mandatory government education from 4 to 20 years old to more fully brainwash kids?

1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will try but they will fail. This is why governor races and local elections are very critical.

2
ufkyflflfguio 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea that you can do any of this through government mandates is retarded. That's how leftists reason.

1
Wordlife187 1 point ago +1 / -0

.....3 words that will ensure it never passes: Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch.

-1
PraiseBeToScience -1 points ago +1 / -2

lol banning abortion will turn out shitlibs in elections like you wouldn't believe, you'll literally do nothing but lose, short or long term.

Your pathetic abortion ban beacuse your fucking feelings are hurt by something that doesn't affect you in the slightest will result in the black population exploding and then they'll vote for your genocide.

But you know, muh jesus n sheeit.

PS: If your god is going to send you to hell because someone else got an abortion, your religion is utter trash and you're dumb as fuck.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol go look at who you are "saving" by banning abortions. Hint: it's leftoid spawn who want you dead.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
gamingthisandthat 22 points ago +22 / -0

DO IT BITCHES I WANT TO SEE THE MASS TRIGGERING

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

They would have to make a new branch of government like the atf, Dea

To stop underground abortion clinics.

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
1
Wordlife187 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have faith in ACB, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch?

17
dahdahdah_dahditdah 17 points ago +17 / -0

"If you want to see a revolution go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people,"

Wait, I thought insurrections were bad and those people should be locked up?

So election fraud is not a big deal, people should just roll with it and for the love of all that is holy, not peacefully carry any signs into the US Capitol.

But apparently not letting people kill babies is the end of the world and it's time for progressives to violently storm the SCOTUS building? Am I understanding this right?

6
IAmNotAnAutist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just say "It's the settled law of the land. Don't like it? Go to prison for protesting against it".

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +1 / -0

The DOJ will get right on that!

Seriously, we need to purge the commies from Washington, DC. We need to win a couple elections and then start helicopter time. (Metaphorically speaking, but we need to make it very undesirable to be a filthy, lying, traitorous commie.)

14
deleted 14 points ago +26 / -12
42
Julia_J 42 points ago +44 / -2

The fetus is not your body. If the child is male, does that make you half-male? No. A fetus has a different blood type, different DNA, different heart, organs, limbs, different hair, eye color and sometimes skin color and/or sex. Not your body, not your choice.

A unborn child is a human being who is growing because they want to live. A person is a person no matter how small.

"Even the smallest person can change the course of the future" - J. R. R. Tolkien

-2
ufkyflflfguio -2 points ago +1 / -3

Correct, it is not your body. It is using your body without your permission. Since it is a person, it needs to vacate your property when asked.

4
HuggableBear 4 points ago +4 / -0

You gave it permission when you allowed its genetic material inside you, dipshit.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, just like you gave permission to be injected with COVID vax when you decided to live in Joe Biden's America.

Why do you people say patently stupid nonsense? That's not how consent works. You know that's not how consent works. Why do you suddenly become a retarded leftist when it involves things against your religion?

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus, your analogies are retarded. Biology isn't policy. It doesn't change every four years. It is set in stone and cannot be changed. We're not the ones making these rules. The only rule we want to make is to protect the baby. Women can still have all the unprotected sex they want until they get pregnant, at which point they can still have all the unprotected sex they want. They just don't get to kill the baby. That's literally all we're arguing over. Women can make any choice they choose until it impacts another life negatively, then we step in to protect the innocent, just like we do in every other case of harm.

when it involves things against your religion

There it is. Now we're at the heart of it. Thanks for taking the mask off, atheist.

You really shouldn't be against something just because Christians support it, it makes you stupid and easily manipulated.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus, your analogies are retarded.

You're retarded for acting like a dumbfuck fucking leftist. You stated a principle. I applied the logic on your principle.

The only rule we want to make is to protect the baby.

It's not your baby. You don't get to set rules about it. Mind your fucking business.

You really shouldn't be against something just because Christians support it, it makes you stupid and easily manipulated.

ROFL the fucking irony. You're only for it because your pastor told you to be. You don't ever think for yourself.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter what your arguments are. We're going to do everything in our power to stop you form killing babies.

I know you just love killing babies, but we don't care how much you love killing babies. We care about the babies you are killing.

And that's all I'm going to say on the matter. You don't get to kill babies.

4
Sumarongi 4 points ago +4 / -0

you gave it permission when you opened your legs

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, just like you gave permission to be injected with COVID vax when you decided to live in Joe Biden's America.

Why do you people say patently stupid nonsense? That's not how consent works. You know that's not how consent works. Why do you suddenly become a retarded leftist when it involves things against your religion?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-8
MensRea -8 points ago +6 / -14

" who is growing because they want to live" Now that is some crazy unlogical crap. We have people who want to die and take their own lives. Come up with something else.

20
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 20 points ago +21 / -1

It's a human. Terminating it for any reason is murder. Simple enough for you?

-1
MensRea -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nope, its a fetus if it cannot survive on its own. Is that simple enough for you?

2
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fetus is latin for a child in the state of pre-birth. It is a word that directly relates to a living creature before it has emerged from an egg or the mother's body.

But hey, if the genocide of the unborn is your thing, hell awaits. God will sort you out, one way or the other. Hope you enjoy heat.

-1
MensRea -1 points ago +1 / -2

LOL. So you do not know that how to force a woman to have an abortion is in the bible? Go look it up for yourself. Most bible thumpers do not know the bible well enough.

1
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no point at which abortion is approved of, or otherwise taught as some kind of reasonable good, in the Bible.

7
invalid_data 7 points ago +7 / -0

Love how you ignore all the other points and just focus on the one oddly worded sentence. Not the other massive facts that the baby growing inside a woman is not her body, so it's not her choice to murder it.

7
MasklessMarvel [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

" who is growing because they want to live" Now that is some crazy unlogical crap.

in the late 80's there was an earthquake in Mexico City which caused two hospitals to collapse

seven newborns were trapped in the wreckage with no food or water while being exposed to the elements- it was cold and it rained

they all survived because babies go into a state similar to hibernation under adverse circumstances

yeah, babies want to live

-1
MensRea -1 points ago +1 / -2

LIke they were not a fetus? Babies cannot kill themselves. It doesn't mean they want to live. Wait until they are capable of killing themselves before you decide if they want to live.

3
MasklessMarvel [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

OMFG

bye

-1
MensRea -1 points ago +1 / -2

Scared ya.

7
LauriThorne 7 points ago +8 / -1

Unlogical

You can't just put un- in front of a word and make it mean the opposite.

You're unsmart

-1
MensRea -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's easier for someone using illogical reasoning to just do that. They understand better if you speak at their level.

0
LauriThorne 0 points ago +1 / -1

Own your mistake rerard.

1
MensRea 1 point ago +1 / -0

You write like scooby do

0
LauriThorne 0 points ago +1 / -1

See I can admit I fat fingered the word retard.

Can you admit that you had to look up illogical?

11
Eu-is-socialist 11 points ago +13 / -2

Your body ... not your choice ... take what is mandated ... and go to prison if you take what isn't !

FUCK MOST PEOPLE !

10
bidensmissingbrain 10 points ago +10 / -0

Your choice was made when you chose to partake in an act which would lead to pregnancy. Those choices have consequences.

6
ImportantPerson 6 points ago +6 / -0

I love watching people rage when I point out the choice they made.

Then they say "well, what about pregnancy from rape?!?!?!? Checkmate!" It's always fun to point out that less than 0.1% of all abortions are a result of rape.

4
bidensmissingbrain 4 points ago +4 / -0

pregnancy from rape

In addition to being an extremely small number, there are other, far better solutions to care for both the mother and the child in that situation.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

Your choices can lead to disease. Should we not cure those diseases if possible? What kind of stupid logic is this?

5
Drewski1138 5 points ago +5 / -0

A. Human. Being. Is. Not. A. Disease.

-3
ufkyflflfguio -3 points ago +1 / -4

Moron, try to follow along. You said that choices have consequences. You said that we should make people suffer those consequences. Your logic is bad.

2
Drewski1138 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. I’m not OP, but that’s a moot point, because OP is correct.

Your reasoning, dehumanizing an individual with a heartbeat, an individual who will cower and hide as far back in the womb as they tear that individual apart with sharp objects and suck out the pieces with a vacuum, is repulsive. These children are alive, and they deserve the same chance at life that you did.

My mother was unable to have children after I was born. I lost two siblings during pregnancy, and I spent my life as an only child, always with that deep loneliness and wondering what would life be like if my siblings lived. How many other families are there out there like that that would be happy to take an unwanted child in? More than you know.

Killing a child is not the way to “cure” the consequences of choices. Elevating the family: mother and father committed to staying and living together to provide a safe environment for their children is the answer.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elevating the family: mother and father committed to staying and living together to provide a safe environment for their children is the answer.

But that's not your answer. Your answer is to tell the government to solve the problem with violent force, the only tool they have.

1
Drewski1138 1 point ago +1 / -0

The government already has laws on the books dealing harshly with murder. Don’t be a baby murdering psycho. Your point is?

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. We do believe that using force to capture and punish someone who commits murder is justified.

You're never going to win this argument because your premise is that a baby only becomes a baby when the mother decides she wants it. That's patently ridiculous and you all know it, which is why you have to fight against it so hard, otherwise you would have to admit that you decided murdering innocent babies is an acceptable price to pay for sex that feels better.

4
bidensmissingbrain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Way to try and bring oranges into an apple contest. 👎

-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

Read your own logic, dumbass. Your argument was shit. Come up with a better one.

9
RolandDelacroix 9 points ago +12 / -3

Let's wait to hear what the kids choice is, with their body.

-3
ufkyflflfguio -3 points ago +1 / -4

Ok, I asked several fetuses and none of them answered. Seems like they don't care.

2
HuggableBear 2 points ago +2 / -0

If being able to communicate intelligible is a condition of life, then it's about time we aborted you.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not an argument.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't supposed to be, genius. It's called mockery.

4
WorkoutEveryHour 4 points ago +5 / -1

not your body

14
TommyJarvis 14 points ago +15 / -1

See, I’m all for the medical privacy part, it just shouldn’t apply to infanticide.

12
IAmNotAnAutist 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yup. Infanticide isn't 'medicine'.

-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

You don't get to decide what it applies to. When somebody goes into a doctor's office, does some shit, then comes back out, privacy means you don't get to ask what happened, period.

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

There's a difference between "you don't get to ask what happened" and making baby murder legal.

a HUGE difference.

Would it be legal under Roe v. Wade for the doctor to buttfuck you while you're under anesthesia? Why not? It happened when you were in a doctor's office. No. Some things are simply a crime and just because they happen in one place doesn't make it not a crime.

-1
ufkyflflfguio -1 points ago +1 / -2

There's a difference between "you don't get to ask what happened" and making baby murder legal.

If nobody gets to ask what happened, that means the cops too.

Would it be legal under Roe v. Wade for the doctor to buttfuck you while you're under anesthesia? Why not? It happened when you were in a doctor's office. No. Some things are simply a crime and just because they happen in one place doesn't make it not a crime.

Uhh, you are the patient. If YOU want to reveal to the police that you got anally raped and invite them to investigate your medical records, then they can. But they don't get to go poking around without your permission first.

3
TommyJarvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope. A crime is committed in a doctor's office. It doesn't matter if the patient and doctor conspire to commit the crime.

-2
ufkyflflfguio -2 points ago +1 / -3

Something without a recognizable victim cannot be a crime, by definition.

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck you. You're a fucking scumbag for saying a baby isn't a victim.

Enjoy hell you slimy retard.

-3
ufkyflflfguio -3 points ago +1 / -4

Two options:

  1. The fetus is a person. It therefore needs to leave the womb when ordered to, otherwise it is the perp and the mother is the victim. Abortion is self-defense.

  2. The fetus is not a person. Therefore there is no victim at all and abortion is fine.

Which is it?

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

And if the patient is severely retarded and can't communicate, it's then up to their advocate to get the cops involved.

We are advocating for the babies that can't communicate yet.

Jesus, your arguments are awful. My 6 year old daughter could run rings around you.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are advocating for the babies that can't communicate yet.

Ahh, I see. Ok just show me where the fetus signed away their power of attorney to you, and then we can have a discussion on that matter.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that's a very good point, they didn't sign away power of attorney to anyone, which is why you can't kill them. You don't get to be the one to decide whether to pull the plug. Besides which, power of attorney doesn't give you the right to actively stop life, only to stop prolonging it. If lack of interference results in continued life, then it's murder when you interfere. That interference being ripping them out of the womb.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that's a very good point, they didn't sign away power of attorney to anyone, which is why you can't kill them.

No, it's why you can't intervene on their behalf. They don't even have a behalf.

Besides which, power of attorney doesn't give you the right to actively stop life, only to stop prolonging it.

Right, so the woman whose body is being used without her consent to supply sustenance can choose to cut off that supply of sustenance.

If lack of interference results in continued life, then it's murder when you interfere.

Wrong. If a hobo comes into your house and steals your things to keep himself alive, you have every right to "interfere" with him doing this.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

When it's murder, we absolutely do. Period.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Murder is violating the consent of one of the parties involved. Which party are you referring to here? You can't murder something that isn't even a person because it can't even conceptualize consent.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Murder is violating the consent of one of the parties involved

No it isn't. It's taking a life. You don't get off on murder charges for killing someone if they asked you to do it.

Besides which, the inability to consent at the time is not the same as the inability to consent at all. Even if it were, we protect plenty of other people who have the inability to consent due to various conditions. If it's not okay to kill someone with Lou Gehrig's disease or w/e, then it's not okay to kill babies.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it isn't. It's taking a life.

Oh so you're a vegetarian then?

Besides which, the inability to consent at the time is not the same as the inability to consent at all.

I agree. But fetuses cannot consent, even in principle. Their brains, if the brain has even developed yet, simply cannot do it.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter what your arguments are. We're going to do everything in our power to stop you form killing babies.

I know you just love killing babies, but we don't care how much you love killing babies. We care about the babies you are killing.

And that's all I'm going to say on the matter. You don't get to kill babies.

11
MugaUSA 11 points ago +11 / -0

FYI - I heard the ruling wouldn't come out until June 2022.

18
RolandDelacroix 18 points ago +18 / -0

Just in time to rile up the Dem base. The SC is as much the enemy as anyone else in govt.

3
MugaUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's what I was thinking too.

4
armedprincess23 4 points ago +4 / -0

All Supreme Court verdicts happen in June. October is when they choose their cases and June is results. Always has been.

1
MugaUSA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks you. Saves me some research time.

3
ParticleCannon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that when the glass bottle and brick deliveries are due?

(filling them with gasoline is going to be fun during a bidendemic. sucks to jog!)

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

A Term of the Supreme Court begins, by statute, on the first Monday in October. Usually Court sessions continue until late June or early July. The Term is divided between "sittings," when the Justices hear cases and deliver opinions, and intervening "recesses," when they consider the business before the Court and write opinions. Sittings and recesses alternate at approximately two-week intervals.

During the intervening recess period, the Justices study the argued and forthcoming cases and work on their opinions. Each week the Justices must also evaluate approximately 130 petitions seeking review of judgments of state and federal courts to determine which cases are to be granted full review with oral arguments by attorneys.

The Court maintains this schedule each Term until all cases ready for submission have been heard and decided. In May and June the Court sits only to announce orders and opinions

2
MugaUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are a Maskless Marvel! Thanks for this. 👍

0
KingOfTards 0 points ago +2 / -2

That is some bullshit timing. Where did you hear that?

3
MugaUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Conservative talk show this morning. Sounds like the guy bringing the case is very optimistic and has been fighting for pro-life 30 years. It seems insane to wait that long for an opinion and I plan on looking for a second source when I'm able to sit in front of a computer.

1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you. I've never paid attention to cases that overturn historical decisions. Seems like a different process is involved.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

how about from the Supreme Court?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/procedures.aspx

2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah the 130 review of petitions weekly to the work schedule is why. Thank you

10
Julia_J 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yes please! Poland banned the murder of unborn children and the US should do the same.

5
MasklessMarvel [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

in Ireland the mother goes to prison

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Move to Poland.

1
Julia_J 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am from Poland but I also have American citizenship. Voted for both Duda and Trump twice.

9
NicklePickle 9 points ago +10 / -1

It is insane that the fight over being able to kill babies is this fucking strong.

3
Lad_status_wewd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kind of surreal huh?

9
Jecovidwitness 9 points ago +10 / -1

Nobody is taking anyone’s choices away, you have the CHOICE to not get pregnant in the first place or at least sleep with responsible men. Once pregnant, there’s another human that needs protection and can’t speak for themselves.

-2
ufkyflflfguio -2 points ago +1 / -3

If it can't speak for itself, then it's not a person.

5
Jecovidwitness 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone in a coma, mental disability, deaf, old age, infants, medicated, even asleep….none of these PEOPLE can speak for themselves. You don’t just cease to be a person. The fetal stage is just a stage of development. It is a person.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of your examples are temporary. A fetus is not. It can never speak for itself. It has to first develop into a person.

1
Jecovidwitness 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is speaking? English? Crying? Gurgling? Maybe kicking and rolling? 🤔 What if you as an English speaking adult tries to communicate with a Chinese baby? Is that baby not a person because they can’t communicate with you (assuming you don’t know Chinese, feel free to sub a language you don’t understand) in your acceptable way? This argument sounds like someone really reaching for a reason to make abortion moral. It is not.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is speaking? English? Crying? Gurgling? Maybe kicking and rolling?

Good question. Do animals engage in these behaviors? Animals such as cows or pigs? Is it ok to kill those animals and eat their meat as food?

1
Jecovidwitness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is eating babies Hillary??

If you ask a vegan the answer is no, but in general to survive yes we as a species at the top of the food chain use other animals as food.

We don’t eat babies.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you ask a vegan the answer is no, but in general to survive yes we as a species at the top of the food chain use other animals as food.

Ok so then crying, gurgling, kicking and rolling are not good enough.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
7
MasklessMarvel [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

yeah, that's the problem

the "back alley abortion" thing is bullshit

when it was illegal prior to Roe, 90%+ of abortions were performed off the record by doctors

it will go back to that if abortion is made illegal again

babies will keep being killed but pro-life people will have claimed great victory and
the baby killings will go unnoticed

if they want a real solution, prosecute the mothers

4
Dev404 4 points ago +4 / -0

Women have more rights than men and no responsibility whatsoever. Endless preferential treatment and funding for bullshit and they still claim they're oppressed and that we live in an oppressive patriarchy. This would be the first "patriarchy" that elevates females into sainthood because reasons and descends men into demons because we tried to hold women responsible for their actions and keep society going.

4
MasklessMarvel [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

women gets knocked up

she wants to kill the baby- man has no say

she wants to keep the baby- man has to cough up money to support it

2
Dev404 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely. We have kept all our responsibilities and shouldered additional burdens. More and more men are getting put off by this arrangement and choose not to date seriously, not marry, and get circumcisions. Meanwhile, "women most affected."

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

fact: girls will lie and trap boys into a relationship and/or giving them money

i give the same advice to all young men when the subject comes up

wear a condom

no matter what she says about being on the pill or whatever, wear a condom.

bring your own condoms- don't use hers. you never know if there are needle holes in them

if she has a problem with this, walk away

You can always masturbate

2
Dev404 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree on every suggestion. It's way too dangerous these days to get careless and expect the system and society to be reasonable.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Dev404 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's kind of interesting that many different cultures around the world drew similar conclusions when it comes to female behavior, yet almost every woman claims, "I'm different."

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes let's just make a complete police state and then pretend it won't be used for things we don't like. Great thinking, comrade.

9
HawkDriverMN 9 points ago +9 / -0

It always amazes me that in a day of complete acceptance of teen pregnancies that abortion is still a thing.

Hell they have tv shows bragging on being teen moms.

9
paramour 9 points ago +9 / -0

Every woman I have ever talked to my whole long life (and believe me...it's long) that has had an abortion confesses that it is the worst decision they have ever made. They regret that course of action every single day. Their guilt is indelible. Why? because... Abortion is murder. ☠️

1
DWAC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please give a specific number.

8
mytummyhurts 8 points ago +9 / -1

I say we need to start repopulating this country. We're going to need the numbers when the chi-coms start wwiii.

8
RlzJohnnyM 8 points ago +8 / -0

Reproductive control starts BEFORE you fuck without protection NOT after

3
MasklessMarvel [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Planned Parenthood has to be the biggest misnomer in history

7
FORMERCHILDSTAR 7 points ago +7 / -0

I oppose abortion. Make it state issue settled by a vote of the people in each individual state, not by court edict. Abortion isn't in the constitution, therefore it's a state issue. State houses should craft legislation then we vote on it. Let's see how the cookie crumbles.

7
ShadowInv 7 points ago +8 / -1

Noooooo. Do you know how many more criminals / poor people there would be if abortion was illegal?

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +5 / -3

I don't. I think every young child is innocent and special. They are a gift from God. It's only later when they are older when some will choose to use their free will to be evil, have bad intentions or to commit bad acts

And the "poor people" question can be solved with a child benefit program like Poland has. More Americans having children will limit a need for mass migration to the US. The current US birth rate is low per each woman so it doesn't necessarily means more children will equal more poor people. Most of America and their children were poor in the 1930s and then in the next generation, these children grew up and were able to afford their own homes in the 1950s.

6
RlzJohnnyM 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nobody is forcing you to carry the baby

YOU GOT PREGNANT AND CHOSE NOT TO ABORT BEFORE 15 WEEKS

1
coyote_777 1 point ago +1 / -0

^^^^^^^ this

6
Prophet11Speaks 6 points ago +6 / -0

Save the babies. Kill the communist.

5
knnbccb 5 points ago +5 / -0

Women have a huge variety of safe and effective methods of birth control. No one should be getting an oops pregnancy.

Alternatively, be more discerning about who you open your legs for.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

be more discerning about who you open your legs for.

there goes my sex life

5
Nukemall 5 points ago +6 / -1

Black lives matter... except at abortion clinics.

-1
PraiseBeToScience -1 points ago +1 / -2

Build more abortion clinics in the hood. Fucking make drive-thrus.

5
xBigCoffinHunter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can’t imagine the evil in your heart to celebrate legally killing babies.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

like when NY lit up buildings and had a celebration when partial birth abortions were legalized?

1
xBigCoffinHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly the example that came to mind. Does anything justify an asteroid blast that wipes us all out more than that? Fuck.

5
Drainthecommies 5 points ago +5 / -0

ACB and Kavanaugh will Cuck this one. We already know that Roberts is taking it with his CCP wife’s strap on

5
BurtMcGirt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want to see employers ban employees who have had abortions, so I can see if communists once again value medical privacy. I bet they won't be saying "private companies can do whatever they want to their employees". Maybe extend it to stores, too. Can't shop if you have had an abortion. They only way to beat the Democrat Communists is to use their own tactics on them.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

that would violate so many employment laws

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Employment laws should not exist.

5
Cdope45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Women at work got mad about Texas abortion laws and said it should be choice like vaxx.

There reasons were all based on emotion. The six week rule isn't long enough to them which maybe it is, maybe it isn't. You still should take responsibility for your choices and monitor your body.

The next thing they mentioned was cases of rape and incest. They make up maybe 2% even with under reporting the amount of cases that do happen. 98% of abortions are because they didn't want the burden of raising the kid. They did not like that fact.

Then the my body my choice came up. I asked them why is it double homicide if a pregnant woman gets killed? I also suggested that if a woman has a choice to kill their baby then a man has the right to abort supporting them financially. Equality right?

They also have no idea the clinics were created by eugenics nuts who hated black people and the woman the Roe v. Wade case was about regretted her decision.

I'm somewhere in the middle. Most abortions happen by liberal women or poor women. Kinda nice they're killing off future democrat voters and welfare recipients early. Just don't use it like birth control and don't use tax money to pay for it.

5
badorangeman 5 points ago +5 / -0

9 months of your life is a small price to pay to not be a murderer.

5
Jerseydeplorable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Abortion has mercilessly ended millions of black lives.

The real racists support abortion. Interesting how they are all Democrats.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Margaret Sanger- founder of PP- openly admitted her plan was the genocide of the black

she even spoke at Klan rallies

4
John_Smallberries 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those revolutionary “young people” are more than welcome to perform voluntary late-term abortions on themselves while it’s still legal.

4
RlzJohnnyM 4 points ago +4 / -0

They want women to fuck whoever they want and abort whenever they want just to fuck whoever they want again without consequences

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
BigIgloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

If abortion were accompanied by mandatory sterilization that would be a fair trade, but it's not and never will be.

4
ironhorse 4 points ago +4 / -0

you want a reset?...here's your reset.

4
donkatronn 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not gonna hold my breath. Unless this is part of the global elites plans to bring chaos in the streets I doubt much will come of this as SCOTUS is mostly going to hell and most dont fear God

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

if that was the case, they could have refused to hear the case

but this is about states' rights, not banning abortion

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
4
_Cabal_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

fetal life

It's human life, dumbass.

2
DWAC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, this reasoning is idiotic. It acknowledges that whatever it is that's in the mother is "life", but tries to categorize it as something other than "human life". Well then, if it's not "human life", then what the fuck is it?!

3
Liberal-BBQer 3 points ago +3 / -0

"You mean I can't act like a promiscuous slut anymore?!? BURN!!! PILLAGE! LOOOOTTTT!!!!!!"

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

you can act like a promiscuous slut

you just can't act like a promiscuous baby factory

2
Liberal-BBQer 2 points ago +2 / -0

They kind of go hand in hand. You don’t win a free plasma TV for having sex. You often win a baby. The odds are better than any casino game.

3
Kek_Johnson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone who has the ethos to murder there own child has no place in my life.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

why do you say that?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

they didn't have standing

you cannot sue on behalf on someone else

half the states cannot ask the court to negate the votes of the other half

that precedent has been around since the 1600s

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The lawsuit challenged election results in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The high court said Texas did not have standing to bring the case.

"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the court wrote

If Texas succeeded, the case would set a dangerous precedent of allowing states to intervene in one another’s affairs — and allowing courts to overturn settled, certified election results.

Should CA be allowed to file a suit contesting the results of the VA election?

It was a sound decision based on centuries of precedent

They saved the country from jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

states elect the president and states are separate entities

what you want is for one state to be able to control another state's elections

if Georgia and Pennsylvania are happy with their results it's no one else's business

if they are not happy they can bring their own lawsuit

3
coyote_777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did that twat just make an argument for abortion because of “socio economic reasons”

2
DWAC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this argument new to you? It's always been one of their arguments.

"It's for the children!"

3
LongDongDonald420x69 3 points ago +3 / -0

nnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
RlzJohnnyM 3 points ago +3 / -0

Equality?

Men have no equality, they have no say

0
_Cabal_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

Neither does the baby

3
Throwmeaway1235 3 points ago +4 / -1

🙏

3
Joeverhisskies 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only way a "revolution" would occur is if they paid BLM and Antifa to start one.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

you mean like they are doing now?