2787
Here we go! (www.thegatewaypundit.com)
posted ago by K3719er ago by K3719er +2789 / -2
Comments (198)
sorted by:
300
Vagiden_Cortez 300 points ago +301 / -1

"This week, Thomas broke his usual silence to ask a question that has pro-abortion activists livid.

” Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother? “ he asked."

BASED

154
ArchbishopofKekistan 154 points ago +154 / -0

"Black Lives Matter... except Thomas. Fuck that guy!" - BLM Marxists

82
chelthing 82 points ago +82 / -0

The black face of huwite supremacy!

4
HughJohnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should legally change his name to Uncle Tom to become the best troll ever.

40
vote_for_MAGA_2020 40 points ago +40 / -0

I’ll be sad 😢 when CT quits/passes.

62
VelvetDevil2020 62 points ago +62 / -0

He's one of the last good stewards of this beautiful country.

11
And_Im_Kenny_Rogers 11 points ago +11 / -0

One of the only. We will never have as good of a SC justice as him.

6
Jonah_Kyle 6 points ago +6 / -0

Amazing that Bush the Terrible nominated him. Had he been another Souter this country would be in deeper shit than it is now.

6
Judiwont 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anyone who travels in an RV for fun and relaxation is based.

37
Wearyman 37 points ago +37 / -0

If you haven't read his autobiography: "My Grandfather's Son" you should do so right away. it is an AMAZING story. Clarence Thomas is a gift to this country from God Himself.

13
NomadicKrow2 13 points ago +13 / -0

I shall add it to the list! Thanks!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
HughJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the rec!

11
kennedyc5217 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hillary’d

20
KickingPugilist 20 points ago +20 / -0

Scalia'd

6
NotAPuma 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why are you suspicious? He only died in his sleep of a Hunting Accident, with a Pillow over his head, and had no Autopsy. That happens all the time.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
HughJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the ranch was frequented by a creepy secret society hunting group.

https://people.com/sports/antonin-scalia-died-during-getaway-with-members-of-secret-hunting-society/

3
Sexual-Assault-Rifle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Epstein'd

1
Voltage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has nothing to do with color but instead with culture.

79
deleted 79 points ago +79 / -0
52
DogFacedPepeSoldier 52 points ago +53 / -1

Please don't make it his Swan song until he's excised whatever demon infested the Trump appointees.

40
Mungo 40 points ago +41 / -1

I am firmly convinced that Kavanah and ACB are having the safety of their children used against them to drive these decisions that they are making. Especially Kavanah…..after what they put him through, his choices make zero sense.

26
Zskills 26 points ago +27 / -1

And then there's Roberts. The child raper getting blackmailed by the IC

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

I would agree, based on some of their decisions, but they've also made a good number of decisions we'd agree with. It is confounding because it's hard to figure out the pattern.

8
AmericaFloats 8 points ago +8 / -0

Kavanaugh asked if each state has the right to determine their own priority, of a pregnant mother looking to abort, and the life of the unborn.

He posed the question as to further tear at any national abortion policy, which further pushes to overturn ROE altogether.

I don't like him, but he's not been false on this one as far as I can see yet.

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wrote this elsewhere, but if Kavanaugh becomes a States' Rights advocate, I will be very pleasantly surprised.

4
Judicator 4 points ago +4 / -0

The way I see it, leveraging threats as political capital is extremely potent, but also risky, and as such, expensive.

I think the powers that be couldn't really give a shit about most issues as long as they don't challenge their power. They'll make a show of fighting stuff but they'll let SCOTUS do whatever because manipulating SCOTUS costs more than not.

Honestly, repealing roe-v-wade would be pretty good for the dems politically. They can point to the SCOTUS and say it's unbiased, they can coax conservatives towards relaxation, and they can piss off their own base. It furthers division, and energizes their base ahead of the midterms, and it doesn't damage their power because they're largely above the law regardless.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made similar comments to both of your main points earlier today.

Kavanaugh is hard to figure, and I don't automatically assume someone who judges differently than I'd like them to is compromised.

Bigger point is that overturning Roe v Wade right now is politically advantageous to the Dems, but it still needs to be done. "If it saves just one life" actually applies somewhat this time.

2
Judicator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh for sure, it may be politically advantageous to them but don't disadvantage how it could be taken by us as motivation, too. They want to pacify us with it but we could just take it as figuratively "smelling blood in the water".

And of course abortion is effectively the root of the moral decay of the nation, so cutting that off is absolutely crucial, and has been since it was first imposed.

7
DogFacedPepeSoldier 7 points ago +7 / -0

1 Corinthians 7:26

5
congruent 5 points ago +5 / -0

you mean the ones from Haiti...

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Die now or die later.

Their children will pay the price to one side or the other.

3
Sylvester1212 3 points ago +5 / -2

Starts with a C and they worship a man in a funny hat in a foreign land.

5
NewUser101 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's about 12 months late.

2
KAGMAGIC2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

He had the opportunity to do so in January

51
labiator 51 points ago +51 / -0

“That’s not what this case is about, but a woman has a right to make choices about her body.”

Like not being pressured to take a vaccine against her will?

29
IroWide 29 points ago +30 / -1

We're not even talking about the woman's body, we're talking about the little body within her womb that is too small to cry 'I have a right to live'.

6
Joshua2001 6 points ago +6 / -0

An interesting thing about the womb is that it isn't actually considered "inside" of the body. It is a cavity that that goes inward and is technically outside of the body. Kind of like your entire digestive system is considered outside. At least that is what science says.

4
WinsomeWonder 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not exactly correct during pregnancy.

There's something called a mucous plug that seals off the uterus, so it's outside the woman's body (I guess) but has it's own chamber.

The difficult thing about this issue is that the placenta DOES impact the mother quite a bit i had thyroid issues and gestational diabetes when I had twins because of how much impact the placentas have on your hormones. Some women can't necessarily carry to term because of their own health issues. Everyone has the right to self defense.

But I also think that the modern medical technology we have also no longer makes bodily autonomy the central issue of abortion. We can support babies outside the womb at 21 weeks, I think we could hypothetically support them at 15 weeks in the near future. Most women can make it the 15 weeks with no real impact on their body besides morning sickness.

4
Joshua2001 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah it's one of those things in science that is "technically" true but really isn't a very good distinction. Pregnancy does a lot to the insides of a women's body, you know like pushing aside organs. It is for sure impactful.

As far as science is concerned about medical technology it should be theoretically possible to support a baby all they from the beginning at conception. It is just a matter of gaining the understanding necessary to properly nourish the child for the duration of the "pregnancy". Now whether that is a place science should go is another question.

1
WinsomeWonder 1 point ago +2 / -1

If Alex Jones is correct, I suspect they already have gone in that direction and they have the necessary technology.

2
Lykanthrocide 2 points ago +2 / -0

By that logic, the body has no inside, and, therefore, no outside either.

Post-modern thought makes no sense.

2
Joshua2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is still an inside. It is where the brains and organs are located.

The digestive system is a hole that is formed in the very beginning of human development. The vagina and uterus would be similar as they form by making an indentation in the early formation (I don't remember how far along, It's been a while). Neither of them breach the insides but are both used to interact with your insides. Like getting nutrients into your blood stream or nutrients from your blood to the baby you are nurturing.

3
labiator 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes

11
FightTheSWAMP 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is exactly what popped into my mind when I heard the cunt Sotomayor and Breyer state that this was simply a case about a woman having the right to make choices about her body.

I immediately thought... so it's acceptable for a woman to terminate her baby because that's her choice but it's not acceptable for a woman to refuse a vaccine to protect her baby.

These people are fucking evil. This has nothing to do with a woman's right to choose and everything to do with them wanting to kill babies.

5
IvIA6A 5 points ago +5 / -0

"ok given your answer, this case isn't about Roe v Wade, and can't be discussed in the context of this case. Therefore I see no reason a state cannot decide when abortion is legal or not"

2
Hombre_Trainee 2 points ago +2 / -0

...that's not what this case is about. ;)

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
1
LoneWolfsBigIgloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The issue is, the left supports this. They’ve vehemently argued this with me recently.

Pieces of shit wanting to decriminalize pregnant mothers taking drugs

111
Timecop1776 111 points ago +111 / -0

“Clarence Thomas is the black face of white supremacy” La times probably

44
PeteButtplug 44 points ago +44 / -0

I thought that was Larry Elder.

30
chelthing 30 points ago +30 / -0

Why not both? - The Left

15
StrongPeacemaker 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or that Lieutenant Gov in Virginia? BASED

7
chelthing 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Left does love their lists!

12
Simple_Doot 12 points ago +12 / -0

There's several million black white supremacists in the United States. Crazy.

5
Wrexxis780 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now he's the "blacker face of white supremacy."

3
Seanp12 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Figures that white supremacy is two-faced!"

2
_M_A_G_A_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

"They look the same to us." -- Rich white liberal "black allies"

101
pushbackv2 101 points ago +101 / -0

And after a year of vaccine rollouts and mandates, bodily autonomy suddenly matters again. Right on cue.

19
JS_Mill 19 points ago +19 / -0

And there's a huge difference between you must to X to your body, vs you must refrain from doing Y to your body.

I'm a little concerned this could be used to say "if you don't get the vax, you will harm the baby". However, as mentioned before must to X is far different than must not to Y.

7
DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 7 points ago +7 / -0

No need to concern yourself, seeing as how the vax is causing miscarriages, aka total harm (death) to the baby.

3
JS_Mill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point

85
pushbackv2 85 points ago +86 / -1

When someone murders a pregnant woman, why do prosecutors file 2 first degree murder charges?

73
PeteButtplug 73 points ago +73 / -0

Because if you want the child it magically causes it to become a viable life. Science!

45
Block_Helen 45 points ago +45 / -0

Literally how it is in their view. If you want it, it's a baby and no one can harm it. If you don't want it, it's not a baby and you yourself can hire a hit man to kill it.

21
Peppers 21 points ago +21 / -0

I call this Schrodinger's baby

14
ColonelHughes 14 points ago +14 / -0

My favorite thing to do is dare someone who says its not a living baby to tell that to a woman.who had a miscarriage to see how it plays out

5
DieHeretic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only if I didn't have to mop up what's left of them, hard to shovel human soup.

3
AmericaFloats 3 points ago +3 / -0

oh, i'm taking this!

9
labiator 9 points ago +9 / -0

Only 2? Those jogger jaggers had what, 3 or 4 felonious murder charges?

4
newuser999 4 points ago +4 / -0

REEEE

50
notCIA 50 points ago +52 / -2

Holy shit. He literally killed them.

They've got nothing to fear though, he is powerless on his own.

37
pushbackv2 37 points ago +38 / -1

Never underestimate Kavanaugh and Roberts' ability to cuck.

8
notCIA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh, I expect it. Especially from the openly Catholic woman who shouldn't be able to go against her faith on the subject but invariably will.

3
Judiwont 3 points ago +3 / -0

“Catholic” sure…

2
pushbackv2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amy Coney Bandwagon

1
Xuvial 1 point ago +1 / -0

He literally killed them.

Yes he did it, abortion is gone!

4
bejeavis 4 points ago +4 / -0

'THE LEFT IS TERRIFIED OF THOMAS'

yeah can't you tell they're totally shaking in their boots. i hate this boomer bait style of writing. it actually serves the opposition through fostering complacency. 'oh it looks like the left is on the retreat gee thanks justice roberts for saving the republic' opens can of woke a cola while flipping on fox news

49
DinosOnNoahsArk 49 points ago +49 / -0

If the Supreme Court were to uphold Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks, it would lead to abortion bans across the country. The pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute estimates that 26 states would impose further restrictions on abortion or outright bans. It’s no wonder the left is terrified of Justice Thomas.

How dare they let the states decide!

3
SneezerAugustus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m no lawyer but I’m pretty sure states have the ability to define what constitutes murder in their respective laws, and that they generally have sole jurisdiction to try the case, unless some aspect of the case involves a federal law.

27
sustainable_saltmine 27 points ago +28 / -1

look, fine if you did something you realize was stupid the next morning and get the morning after pill, but unless your life is literally threatened by the pregnancy, you should not have any right to terminate it if you wait until it become a recognizable fetus just because it'd be "hard for you" to raise the child or "cramps your style".

Sorry, that's the choice you made that you had a chance to fix the next day but you didn't. you deliberately waited for it to become "viable" and then disgustingly snuffed it out because you decided you "didn't want it".

16
winslow1132 16 points ago +18 / -2

There is no medical reason that I have ever heard of that the child should be killed rather than delivered. The supposed ethical dilemma is based on false premises and is never a real situation. That is, if the mother who has some dire health issue cannot be induced then an emergency C-section is the appropriate course of action. Then both the mother and the baby can be saved. "Life of the mother" is just another lie from the left that they use as a smokescreen because people will be suckered into thinking the situation is difficult and nuanced when it's really clear as day.

5
Xuvial 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are certain groups/demographics of people who really shouldn't be reproducing (e.g. libtards, illegals, etc). Their numbers absolutely need to decline.

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +11 / -0

Problem is, libtards aren't born, they are groomed.

3
Retardloserimsogay 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like to think kids of liberals grow up and go, “dang, don’t wanna be like my parents at all” probably happens quite a bit, but the reverse be true too.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe a decade or so ago, your presumption would have been more accurate. Now they are so good at the brainwashing, I'm not sure.

3
Retardloserimsogay 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s a great point, outside influences are now stronger than inside the family, and they only point the masses in one direction.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Almost as if that's by design.......

1
KAGMAGIC2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate to say it but isnt there a correlation between rise of abortion and lowering of crime rates?

3
MapleBaconWaffles 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it's too early in the pregnancy then the child can't survive outside the womb.

I know a couple. The doctors found the woman had an aggressive cancer early in her pregnancy. I believe they wanted to put her on chemo, which would have killed the baby. They believed if they waited until the baby could be delivered the cancer would spread and the woman would probably die. They prayed and trusted God, and she was healed and delivered a healthy baby. But this has happened to other people.

At 30 weeks, yes, it's almost unimaginable that something could happen to cause a "choose the mother or the baby" scenario, but early in the pregnancy it does happen.

4
SneezerAugustus 4 points ago +4 / -0

It does happen, as do rape and incest, but those are red herrings. It’s just an attempt to bog us down in minutiae while we slowly and unwittingly concede the premise. The correct response is “fine, I just want to ban the other 99%.”

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, absolutely. Abortion is murder, but when the mother has reasonable fear of death or grievous bodily harm, then it's self defense. It's nothing too complicated.

1
lolpaladins 1 point ago +1 / -0

The medical reason is profits.

4
IvotedforTrumptwice 4 points ago +6 / -2

Mother’s should always choose their child’s life before their own. There’s no reason to murder offspring in the womb. Ever. Never ever ever should it be allowed to happen for any reason whatsoever. No justification at all. Once that sperm hits the egg, that life becomes the most important one on earth. As a society, we should do whatever it takes to protect it.

3
labiator 3 points ago +3 / -0

vis a vis the rape argument, what percentage of the world's population today is the product of rape at some distant point or points in the past? 100 percent?

1
IvotedforTrumptwice 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could end all arguments by having them finishing the statement: It’s ok to murder your offspring in the womb when….they can’t come up with an answer.

2
congruent 2 points ago +2 / -0

what if roller coasters cause pregnancy?

1
Winter_bow_huntress 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree, and also there’s like at least a hundred different birth control methods on the market today. If someone wants to sleep around then they need to use at least one form of bc. It’s not like these women don’t know how baby’s are made and are helpless to prevent it. The only victims in these situations are the poor babys that have irresponsible mothers.

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Adoption is always an option. Women need to carry to term, but they don't need to raise the child if they don't want to.

16
ColbyP 16 points ago +17 / -1

It's a legitimate question. It's the same thing as if I hit a pregnant woman with my car. I would be charged with 2 counts of murder/manslaughter, not 1. So if the baby counts as a person in that case, it counts as a person in all cases. You don't get to pick and choose.

14
Benwa1985 14 points ago +14 / -0

Thank God for this man. Literally one of the most important safeguards we have against the lunatic left.

13
SaltyKrakenBalls 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fan....meet shit.... REEEEEEEEEEEE

13
PlateOwner 13 points ago +14 / -1

We want LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!

12
Ebbie8708 12 points ago +12 / -0

Black woman make up 7-9% of the total population while having almost 40% of the abortions. Meanwhile, 3 out of 4 black kids don’t have dad in the home. Also, we don’t need to talk about the crime rates.

As a half negro, half injun woman, don’t want to hear sh— about black lives mattering when it’s clear that black people refuse to give a sh— about themselves.

I don’t give a damn what caused the conception of a baby, it’s still a baby. There’s barely enough rape and incest babies to make a blimp on the numbers. how dare people say a baby is unwanted regardless of their circumstances.

A society that cannot defend and protect its young is not a society. At least the quokkas are damn adorable as they chuck their babies to save their own arses.

10
OnlyTrump20 10 points ago +10 / -0

Having multiple "baby mommas" for black men to boast about is also a driving factor, embedded in ghetto culture. It's also part of a Godless culture with no morality of faith to prevent such behavior.

7
FreddyThePatriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

Black woman make up 7-9% of the total population while having almost 40% of the abortions.

And are now 50% of tv characters

4
Ebbie8708 4 points ago +4 / -0

They ain’t 50% anymore.

Men pretending to be women have taken their roles.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
12
BoughtByBloomberg2 12 points ago +12 / -0

He is right. If abortion is a right based on the dicta of viability in Roe V Wade then anything done to a fetus below 24 weeks is free game.

Crack. Heroine. All kinds of prescription drugs. Alcohol. Cutting off 4 of it's limbs leaving the head and torso. Anything you want can be done to a non person under 24 weeks.... IF the right to an abortion which was invented by SCOTUS based on the sole and unique right of a pregnant woman under 24 weeks of duration to medical privacy is a valid argument.

Which it is not. So unlike the insane left which wants the liberty to kill their babies abortion should be stricken from federal record and left wholly to the states because it is NOT a right and nowhere is it enumerated in the constitution nor is medical privacy guaranteed in ANY OTHER CASE.

You can't even fucking get IVERMECTINE FOR COVID ON YOUR FUCKING DEATH BED if the FEDs say no and SCOTUS wants to pretend that they actually believe in Medical Privacy when it comes to abortion. Fuck any justice that pretends their hands are tied because of BAD JURISDICTION because of starre decisis.

11
Block_Helen 11 points ago +11 / -0

I love Justice Thomas so much.

If you haven't read his memoir, My Grandfather's Son, I recommend it most highly. Everyone in America should read it.

10
Throwingway22 10 points ago +11 / -1

Impeach any that vote to uphold for crimes against humanity.

2
Barthaneous 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should hang

10
TheFreeSpeechRadical 10 points ago +10 / -0

In case something happens to him. Clarence Thomas is a healthy man with no history of any chronic disease and most certainly a life loving religious man who wouldn't commit suicide. in other words, Clarence Thomas must not go the same way the late Scalia did.

1
Seanp12 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'll attempt to impeach him if Roe is overturned.

10
Greenhills 10 points ago +10 / -0

Whatever the outcome, one sure thing is that planned Parenthood should be destroyed.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
FreddyThePatriot 6 points ago +7 / -1

The sex is the same moment the father is put on the hook for the consequences of sex.

It doesn't even pass the 14th amendment to have two different standards for this between the sexes.

4
wankingisgay 4 points ago +4 / -0

this. dont play thir argument they need a choice. they HAD a choice. not have sex.

IF women would get spontaneosly pregnant, then yes, they would have a choice argument.

7
ChocolateEvryday 7 points ago +7 / -0

I admire his jurisprudence so much.

7
ChicagoFaucet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just a quick reminder that if abortions were counted as a cause of death, it would be the leading cause of death in the US today.

6
dahdahdah_dahditdah 6 points ago +6 / -0

Clarence Thomas is the answer to those who are fatigued of arguing against the anti white racial hate of CRT and flirting with swinging the pendulum as far as ethnic nationalism. Statistics is admittedly a real thing, however individuals will frequently surprise you.

I would take one Clarence Thomas over five Amy Coney Barretts and Brett Kavanaughs.

6
Monzie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thomas is there for a reason. Pro-lifers have been waiting and praying for this stain on our country to be undone for almost 50 years, that's a lot of prayers. Even in this insane clown world we find ourselves in, don't forget that God answers prayers, often when we least expect it and in the most unexpected ways.

5
Winter_bow_huntress 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our based justice Thomas is not only a good man but possibly one of the best justices we’ve ever had!

5
FreddyThePatriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

Trump just had to be a sexist and appoint a girl for the sake of appointing a girl

6
Winter_bow_huntress 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah I wasn’t super thrilled about her to begin with but she’s proven to be absolutely useless for conservative values.

5
Titanium5 5 points ago +5 / -0

PP harvests aborted fetus to sell human tissue for huge dollars to all types of companies.

THAT IS WHAT THIS IS REALLY ABOUT.

5
IvIA6A 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kavanaugh and Roberts will cuck out of course.

5
clownworld30330 5 points ago +6 / -1

Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?

Now do this one: can the State force her to?

5
SlickMike 5 points ago +5 / -0

Based Thomas saving America!

5
RogueLeaderX 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thomas is just one man, sadly.

Shame we don't have more men like Thomas in the country.

4
Joeverhisskies 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you don't like it, move to a blue state. We are moving to a time where we will have 2 different countries, red states and blue states, blue can wear masks, have vax passports and no large events, hunting, farming or ranching and red states can just live a great American life.

2
Retardloserimsogay 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup!!!

4
superp321 4 points ago +4 / -0

These women / men may have recklessly created life but that does not give anyone the right to end it. You don't need to raise that child but you shouldn't just get to end it on a whim.That child could go to a foster home and grow up to have children and grand children and none of them would ever know you existed.

3
Philhelm 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this point I'd like it overturned just for the epic fucking meltdown, but it's never gonna happen.

2
KAGMAGIC2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude the insane meltdown would be worth the last 3 years (maybe not, but I will LOL so hard)

1
Philhelm 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly reeeeeeeeeeeed. I fear something great has happened."

3
StrongPeacemaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude, I love this guy

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a man sticks his willy in a woman, does the woman own the willy?

2
Retardloserimsogay 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thinks that why ya gotta pop it in there and take it back out real quick, before she gets to kill it. A dangerous game!

3
DairyBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

HOES

1
DairyBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAD

(I feel like the dude who has to high five himself now)

3
nds19 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCROTUS is complicit in the destruction of this country.

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ha, I'm glad I'm not the only one who calls them that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
OG_MAGA4LIFE 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm afraid he may get Epstiened

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well we know how he's gonna vote. The question is how Kavanaugh will, most likely.

2
MAGA-Fett 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL, breaking the left with simple questions!

2
Seanp12 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Roe is overturned, I expect Pelosi to have impeachment charges filed against Thomas.

2
thereal____ 2 points ago +2 / -0

He will be dead in less than a year.

2
EatMyBallsAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make him CHIEF JUSTICE

2
MattWoodPA 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are going to Scalia him....

2
Censorddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only right a woman has to her body is when it's her body. That is NOT HER BODY RESIDING IN HER BODY.

she should've abstained, used 'protective' measures. Or just not be a complete whore.

2
mikethemarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Robert Mog Right! And if a man performs an "abortion" by shooting his pregnant girlfriend in the belly, he goes away for double murder. In fact, if abortions were performed with guns, Dimms would be lifetime members of the NRA.

Some one knows how Dems are, took this from the comments

2
VoteRepublicanAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

"A black mouth is moving but white supremacy is coming out of it!"

-some race baiting racist black guy asshole on MSNBC

2
Smdlegend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Give them hell Mr. Thomas.

2
NarrativeControl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Abortion should be legal, but only if that child is going to grow up and become part of antifa.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Txponi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roe indicated the first three months of pregnancy did not discuss or include partial birth abortions in the ninth month. They are all children being killed by their mothers. We have just moved on to vaccinating your toddler with a substance which is far more dangerous than the infection (a shot which is not a cure nor a vaccine-according to science). Is this also the right to choose?