posted ago by Fact ago by Fact +7 / -1

Easy-reading as in, it can't have "Related articles: FUCK JOE BIDEN" down the sidebar. It can't have Mengele style posters of Fauci. It can't have Alex Jones screaming. Even though I support all those things.

Comments (18)
sorted by:
3
2
Fact [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you, this will tie brilliantly to Joe Rogan's doctor being in this alliance.

3
IvermectinWorks 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/incredible-ivermctin-icu-recovery-story-msm-will-never-show-this/

After "modern" medicine exhausted all the tricks up their sleeve, they left the man for dead and refused to let him even try Ivermectin, because they didn't want to be embarrassed.

2
Fact [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent one, thank you.

1
IvermectinWorks 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got tons more if you need it, but it'd be information overload if I threw it all at you at once.

1
Fact [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I kind of need digestible stuff. I have this which is more information than anyone would ever need but it's not in a format any layperson who hasn't been properly red pilled yet can digest.

https://files.catbox.moe/rsgt0w.pdf#page=91

1
IvermectinWorks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's do this one. This is a study posted on Fauci's own website. Why would the hospitals listen to one part of Fauci's advice but discount the other:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354804/

These were the NIH's and WHO's findings:

According to the results of the meta-analysis, treatment at an earlier stage of the disease (<=5 days after the onset of symptoms) is more successful, with an estimated 81% reduction in the measured effects (fever, death, no virological cure, no resolution of symptoms, need for ventilation, need for hospitalization, etc.) relative risk (RR) 0.19 [0.10- 0.039] [21]. It should be noted that, 96 % of the 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the meta-analysis also report positive effects report positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 74% and 83% for early treatment and prophylaxis (RR 0.26 [0.16-0.42] and 0.17 [0.05-0.61])

1
Fact [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, by "Fauci's own website" you do mean nih.gov, right? Not that there's an archived link anywhere of that flipflop cocksucker actually referring to this study?

1
IvermectinWorks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, on NIH. Fauci has never even so much as been asked about these studies on NIH.

Here's another one...

Over 30,000 people die within 21 days after getting the vax: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/15/30k-people-died-within-21-days-of-having-a-covid-19-vaccine-in-england/

Versus they stopped the swine flu vaxx after only 3 people died: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article

Check out this "fact checker" in the UK who said, oh, gee, I don't see one bit of evidence that this claim is true. Maybe if they had checked the CDC's website, they'd have found the source of the info.... https://fullfact.org/online/swine-flu-vaccine-1976-covid/

They are lying to you....

2
Fact [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crimes against humanity. :( But for another day. I don't think this person can take vaccines = murder on the same day as ivermectin = good and ivermectin != horse meds.

2
magapotus 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dying-covid-19-patient-recovers-after-court-orders-hospital-administer-ivermectin

Hospital refused judge order several times. Patient was nearly dead, now recovered.

2
2
Fact [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you, I already had the meta-analysis in the first link bookmarked, but the website it's on itself, https://c19ivermectin.com, looks real good.

1
Voiceofreason72 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're welcome! Good luck

1
imnotdeadyet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember for preventative, its not just Ivermectin, you need Zinc, Vit C, Vit D and Quercetin. For a treatment, you will need other meds in addition to these. The meds depend on the treatment you use (Dr Z, FLCCC Alliance, etc.)