3368
Comments (157)
sorted by:
172
FauciOuchi 172 points ago +173 / -1

What about the CIA

82
basedvirginian 82 points ago +86 / -4

Most dangerous organization to have been created in the past 200 years

17
glow-operator-2-0 17 points ago +17 / -0

Thank William Donovan for that, and J Edgar Hoover for the idea

27
Awan-CIA-Car-Lot 27 points ago +27 / -0

Of all the gall. Cause a mass shooting and then sue the gun manufacturer.

This government truly has no shame.

14
Kinestron 14 points ago +14 / -0

Don't forget they are using YOUR money to do it too.

If you were to write a check or have a charge on your credit card without your knowledge, I'm sure many American's reaction once they found out would be "WTH, I didn't authorize this!"

Side note: we should NEVER haver gotten away from sending in taxes directly instead of automatically taken from your paycheck.

10
PorcupineKing 10 points ago +10 / -0

I thought that was the FBI. Eh...same bunch of assholes

6
FliesTheFlag 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bbbbbut they don't operate on US soil! Tehy absolutely do, fuck all them agencies and the muh Rank and File are good people line, hate that line so much they are all complicit in everything going wrong and their fake terror attacks.

4
_Eric_Ciaramella_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrat Party has entered the chat

4
GravityBounce1976 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Federal Reserve enters the chat.

2
Done_With_This_Shit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure they are responsible for the cartels that are making Mexico and central America unlivable. They have been trading guns for drugs for YEARS. Destabilizing countries, supporting criminal organizations, doing psychological experiments on civilians in the US and abroad, controlling mass media, buying and selling kids...and that's just what we know about.

29
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 29 points ago +29 / -0

Alex Jones said Vegas might of been a faction within the Saudis. Just as easily could of been the CIA though.

26
CaptainButthurt 26 points ago +26 / -0

Yeah def something big went sideways and was covered up.

22
MrStep 22 points ago +22 / -0

Memory holed by the media, brief investigation concluding "wow, this is tough to figure out, guess we're done". Nothing to see here, I'm sure.

15
prayinpede 15 points ago +15 / -0

And the only witness fleed to mexico was brought back to do an interview on ellen with his own fbi handler.

I talked to a guy that was there. He said people dressed as security guards were firing into the crowd as well as 2 helicopters firing down.

17
thisguy883 17 points ago +17 / -0

From what I remember:

There was more than one shooter as various eye witness reports have stated.

A Saudi prince was staying at the hotel at the time.

The Saudi prince who wanted this guy dead owned the top floor of the hotel, where the shooters were at.

The security guard who was there did a special interview with Ellen, and was very cryptic.

Ellen has a contract with the hotel, so she got the exclusive.

Survivors who put together a group and met up with each other to find out what happened, have almost all died later on by either other shootings, or "natural causes".

The "Shooter" had no background in anything. He operated a plane service and was thought to be a smuggler for the CIA. His "wife" a Filipino woman, left the country before the shooting happened and allegedly was paid a handsome amount.

Various shootings were reported via the emergency operators that night, but were not reported by the media.

Blackhawk helicopters were seen on the roof during the night of the shooting.


So my thoughts are:

CIA gun smuggling gone wrong

or

Failed assassination attempted of a Saudi prince (would explain the blackhawks)

or

Psyop orchestrated to enact more gun control. Bump stocks were banned because of this, even though it was proven the weapons did not have bump stocks, but were in fact modified to allow full auto, which is already illegal.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
8
AlphaTheBetaFish 8 points ago +8 / -0

It was actually a combination of both. The FBI (paddock) was selling guns to the guys that wanted to assassinate the prince on the top floor. They figured out it was a sting and killed Paddock. Shot open the windows and started firing. It’s why the FBI was there ahead of time. Paddock couldn’t have shot that many rounds from that room. Some suspect it was ISIS

8
JohnCocktoastin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I never saw anything about them being modified to full auto. I'm not saying they weren't, but the sounds in the video seem way too slow for true full auto fire in an AR/M4/M16 platform. True full auto sounds about 3-4x as fast...maybe more. It does actually sound like the rate of full auto fire on an AK47 though. Some of the shots sound like AK to me. But all I've seen is the dude used 5.56/223 AR style rifles. Maybe 2-3 months ago someone here mentioned an AR10? But that also is something I never saw elsewhere nor did I hear it on any video I saw of the incident.

Psyop + fall guy seems like the most logical culprit. Think of the idiocy here...this guy was supposed to be a firearms aficionado. Goes through the hassle of hauling ALL of this shit to his room. Meaning he clearly thought something out here. So we presume the dude knew a lot of shit about firearms, and took the time to pre-plan something. Except I cannot swallow this was his plan. Seems more like a dirty arms deal vs a mass shooting.

This guy could have selected far better equipment to perpetrate this that would have been far more lethal, could have utilized suppressors to maintain ambiguity for far longer, and not needed to bring in an insane amount of firearms to his room risking unwanted attention. What would have been far more optimum, deadly, and possibly allowed for him to actually escape could have fit in a single suitcase. Instead, it was a shitload of all the same type of gun that Obama and all the leftists have a hardon to ban....

6
Save_the_Republic 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've listened to some audio that convinced me it was an mg42. Bumpstocks and modern machine guns can fire much more rapidly. Anybody with two braincells to rub together knows that a lone wolf could not have done what this guy did. Who knows what the TRUTH really is?

6
FliesTheFlag 6 points ago +6 / -0

The top 4 floors of the hotel are owned by Bill Gates and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, aka the Dopey Prince that Trump has talked shit about saying he plays with his daddies money. His ass got locked up along with a bunch of other Princes(fhags) and supposedly paid 6 Billion to be released. This is the same fhaggot who runs Obama, filled Obamas entire cabinet, Obama is his bottom bitch after Big Mike goes to town.

8
Cantshadowbanthemall 8 points ago +8 / -0

You know there was video...

3
RegularAmerican 3 points ago +3 / -0

I knew some people there as well. They didn't say any of that shit

7
CelesteD 7 points ago +7 / -0

the helicopters thing was weird, I've seen that video. I wonder what the hell the whole thing was supposed to be ... well, other than obvious false flag event to enact stricter gun control laws, obviously.

4
4WhomTheBellsTroll 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was due to the lack of security cameras in Las Vegas

10
JoeMcCarthyWasRight 10 points ago +11 / -1

Remember the footage from that night?

The helicopters. The armed escorts through the casinos. Something fucking stunk that night and still stinks. White people at a country show though, so let’s just change the subject.

8
humble_kekistani 8 points ago +9 / -1

When the CIA orders a hit, the have to order it from a different country, like JFK via Cuba and 9/11 also via the saudis

2
alienjesus 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was actually the elite playing on Zuckerberg’s and Bill Gate’s mind control simulator. Grand Theft Auto: Real Life. That’s the conspiracy that only makes sense of this weird, coincidental, backwards-ass world we live in.

4
VarusSPQR 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol, came here to say FBI.

2
GodKingHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were focusing on the CP

2
Jacksonvarrik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or enabling it.

1
GodKingHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

FUCKING PADDOCK FUCKING WITH MY DOWNLOADS!!!!

1
AHonkTooFar 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the manufacturers of terrorism?

59
LindaSarsourCunt 59 points ago +60 / -1

When do we start holding litigators who bring forth pointless lawsuits, and try to inhibit the 2A responsible?

31
UsernameChexOut 31 points ago +31 / -0

About the same time when we start holding election stealers and covid jabbers accountable... so basically never

8
RBK2 8 points ago +8 / -0

holding insert any politician here accountable

I hate this phrase so much because it never happens.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
18
akira2501 18 points ago +18 / -0

We need to do it like ancient Greece. You can be a DA for 1 year. At the end of that year, a council of citizens holds a trial on your year, if you are found guilty of any infractions or failures to uphold your oath of office you are immediately thrown in jail and stripped of your law license.

You can't just hand people ultimate power and then let them walk away when their term is up.

3
LindaSarsourCunt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd be cool with that... even to take it a bit more moderate. The Trial at the end of each year is solid, however, we give them one year where they are afforded mistakes...

Just a thought.

1
nickybops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Somehow Congress would strip the people of this duty and it would be another thing the bureaucracies will swallow up and nothing will ever happen.

14
jebbush123 14 points ago +16 / -2

It’s actually nuts if you think about it. It’s like trying to sue Ford for a drunk driving accident.

16
Jamahawk 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's like trying to sue ford for a "parade crash".

1
Done_With_This_Shit 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS.

4
WakeMeUpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also need to hold those responsible who infringe on any part of the constitution. Free speech destroyers need some attention too.

52
RATMW 52 points ago +53 / -1

That shooting was hushed up just as quickly as the BLM terrorist attack in Waukesha.

32
bobobob 32 points ago +32 / -0

Same with the Christmas Day bombing in Nashville last year.

6
9Alp_CMa 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or the Baltimore BGE explosion on Dec 23rd.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
23
AbolishTheFed 23 points ago +25 / -2

Stephen Paddock was a federal operative. He went from working as a letter carrier for USPS to the IRS, DOD and Lockheed Martin.

People around claim he was going on about Waco, Ruby Ridge and Hurricane Katrina and saying the government was going to take his guns. Basically a walking media stereotype of right wing gun owners.

What better way to not draw attention to yourself from the feds than to start shooting civilians from a hotel in Las Vegas! They had to memory hole it because it’s just so unbelievably stupid. Never mind his father being on the FBI top 10 most wanted list and his brother being a pedophile.

14
Crappydatum 14 points ago +14 / -0

His brother wasn't a "pedophile" until he spoke out about the FBLie. Suddenly they "found" child porn on his computer, when they can't find it on Hunter's laptop after 3 years?

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
13
TheRougarou 13 points ago +13 / -0

It is the FBI that should be held accountable for their own terrorist attack.

13
Comanche_Moon 13 points ago +13 / -0

They can't blame the gun manufacturers when they won't even reveal who the real force behind the shooter was.

3
Save_the_Republic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could they match a bullet to any guns found? I haven't seen any evidence like this. Then how can you sue a gun manufacturer if you can't prove their guns were even used?

9
Schroeder09 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is there even a theory of what happened with the Vegas shooting at the country concert? Gotta admit, they did a good job on this one on their cover up. I still until this day haven't seen a good theory on what happened.

5
PoorMansPsychiatrist 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, but the sheriff is running for governor now, so I'm sure he'll explain it all.

7
Crappydatum 7 points ago +7 / -0

That sheriff looked TERRIFIED at the press conference. Every time he said something, he looked over to the FBLie agent to see if it was OK. That's when I KNEW it was dirty

3
gquickie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nevada is turning into East Commiefornia. The communist Democratic Socialist party has taken over Dem party leadership in the state. The state legislature is heavily blue. Ex-Commiefornians are escaping their shithole state and infesting Nevada. Governor Sissyfuck will be reelected. Nevada is headed down the same rundown path as Commiefornia. It will be an uphill battle to flip it MAGA.

However, the "officially reported" Trump vote in 2020 wqs higher than I expected, and Trump includes Nevada in his list of states that he won. I'm surprised to see this Court ruling.

Maybe there is some hope.

2
14DaysToFlatten 2 points ago +2 / -0

Disgruntled gambler mad because they cut off his comps.

2
ragnarokrobo 2 points ago +2 / -0

No more comped sushi does strange things to a man.

2
14DaysToFlatten 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not everybody works at taco bell!

7
BoughtByBloomberg2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course not. Imagine the lawsuits from holding the manufacturers of the murder weapon responsible.

Suing the MLB for promoting baseball bat production when they are often used to kill people.

5
thisguy883 5 points ago +5 / -0

or literally any knife company.

These lawsuits are retarded. You can argue blaming the manufacture of anything for any death related to the item used in a crime, like an SUV for example.

Glad it was thrown out. Should have never been brought up in the first place. Fucking idiot liberals.

7
TheSonOfGadsden 7 points ago +7 / -0

Suck it sisolak

6
DeuteronomyTwentyone [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup!!! I wish he'd be investigated next for all that donation money he raised for the 'victims' that went missing and never given to them 🧐

6
CrispyQuesoSalami 6 points ago +6 / -0

I mean...the precedent it would set is that ANY tool used negligently or for ill purpose, the manufacturer is liable?

Clearly in normal world this would be clear as day, however this is clown world so.

Vax manufacturers, no liability.....gun industry, liable. Sure.

If I used my Dewalt circular saw while drunk and things got messy, thats clearly THEIR fault. Or if my wife got sick of me a threw a Crate and Barrel mixing bowl at me in anger, they're on the hook.

5
acasper 5 points ago +5 / -0

That this needed to be litigated in the first place is a disgrace. I'm happy that this result is on the books in Nevada and precedent has been set, but I don't see other challenges elsewhere taking the hint in the future unless there is a SCOTUS decision.

5
RyanUpCreek 5 points ago +5 / -0

The FBI creates a crime and then has the state try to take away gun rights. Fuck those mfers all the way to hell

5
BobBlackwood 5 points ago +5 / -0

Any good documentaries about this? Its hard to find info on what really happened. Wasnt there something about a Saudi Prince? And Trump alerted him to the hit attempt or something?

4
DeuteronomyTwentyone [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I pretty sure cucktube has scrubbed most if not all the videos that were alt. theories. Gab or bichute may have some. Lots of weird shit surrounded this incident, like the Saudi prince theory, the survivors who claimed multiple shooters all mysteriously died, alphabet agency connections... etc.

2
14DaysToFlatten 2 points ago +2 / -0

One came out recently. Money Machine.

5
Uncle_Remus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I heard that it was terrorists (CIA/Mossad). They were going to try to kill Mohammed Bin Salman in a suicide mass shooting. When the plan went bad, they shot Paddock and settled for a mass shooting.

4
Ricky_CIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll save you all the time of looking up the left's response:

"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

4
hillaryforprison 4 points ago +4 / -0

This shouldn't even be considered. Freaking morons. They waste time on this stuff while letting drugs, crime, illegals, human trafficking flourish.

4
BeekeeperAndy 4 points ago +4 / -0

But can the Saudis be held responsible?

6
Kekintosh2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Al-waleed was Captain Kenya's sponsor and had Citigroup pick his cabinet.

2
shadowoverme 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also he and Bill Gates co-owned the top floors of the Mandalay Bay. He was arrested a month later. Interrogated by US mercs, and all his money was seized.

4
MatthewJuly131313 4 points ago +6 / -2

Rememberberries the John E Hoover channel on YouTube exposed the multiple shooters that did the shooting. He posted a video showing that Stephen Paddock was dead at 10:18PM but gunshots were recorded by police bodycam at 11:59PM and again at 12:45AM. Don't believe me? Look it up yourselves.

4
123breadman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nevada, the state that supports gun rights, but also supports COVID lockdowns.

4
CovfefeVideo 4 points ago +4 / -0

The gun didn't kill anyone - it was the ammo.

4
BringBackBroke46 4 points ago +4 / -0

2017 Las Vegas shooting???

Are we sure that happened? Dont recall any media coverage.

Sure they aren’t talking about that SUV that ran over people in WI or somewhere all by itself?

That manufacturer should definitely be sued.

/sarc

3
ThisIsHowItStarts 3 points ago +3 / -0

BTFO FBI/CIA COMMIES!

3
Snooptwo 3 points ago +3 / -0

What shooting? This one got memory holed so quick

3
The357SigMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

On the surface seems good, but more likely the FBI telling this judge to slap it shut because a case of that magnitude would open up way too much dirt during discovery.

3
StableGenius 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of the gun men was in a helicopter. In 911 recordings, you can clearly hear guns at multiple distances.

3
Save_the_Republic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Since it was an mg42 used to kill all those people, there isn't anybody to sue regardless. I'm still curious who was really behind this and how it was all pulled off.

3
Nanteen 3 points ago +3 / -0

As it should be, do I get to sue forward if a drunk driver kills someone I know?

3
Chosimbaone 3 points ago +3 / -0

In other news Stanley Tools to be sued for hammer deaths and Parents to be sued for their children killing with their hands and feet.

3
Spawnlingman 3 points ago +3 / -0

This decision is what the CIA will consoder a failed mission. They shot up las vegas in order for a law like this to be passed.

3
yudsfpbc 3 points ago +3 / -0

If only we could afford the guns the shooter used.

Or just the ammo!

3
keepamericagreat102 3 points ago +3 / -0

What about SUVs?

3
Junkevil 3 points ago +3 / -0

This sets a serious precedent that stops fat people from suing ice cream.

3
covok48 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good, now sue the CIA.

3
Trumpdidit 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a based decision, and the people who brought this frivolous suit, are simpleton's, who's selfish agenda, has little to do with safety, but more to do with financial gain.

3
BasedCostanza91 3 points ago +3 / -0

What about the ones that supplied the weapons and carried out the massacre? You know, the FBI and CIA?

3
Bigmike65 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remington offered $33 million to the families of Sandy Hook victims, I believe that is still in court and not settled yet

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/14/703439924/lawsuit-by-sandy-hook-victims-against-gun-manufacturer-allowed-to-move-forward

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their insurance company offered. That was a dumb idea, but insurance companies are dumb

3
Romey-Rome 3 points ago +3 / -0

How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?

2
superwookee 2 points ago +3 / -1

In other news Ford, Chevrolet, Honda, Toyota . . . found innocent for all road accidents.

There is no logic that even puts them in the courtroom.

This is a non victory just like Rittenhouse. They should never have been on trial in the first place.

2
Grindelwald 2 points ago +2 / -0

That ought to piss off John Cusack. His movie “Runaway Jury” he’s been turned upside down. Oh, and the same can be said about “Erin Brockovich”. As so many other Hollywood fantasies.

2
TheNoseGoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

No shit. Now sue the feds who provided the guns to the dude.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
renata_h 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought FBI was responsible for shooting.

2
Tookens 2 points ago +2 / -0

It ended the only way it could have. Are you going to sue Ford if some nutcase takes his F-150 out and runs over a bunch of people?

2
Tread_not_on_me 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh ya don’t say? Lmfao

2
GreyKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

If someone wanted to remove the ability of people to purchase firearms and ensure a monopoly of force in conjunction with legislation to ban ownership, what would they do differently than this...?

2
Idontevenknow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably orchestrate gun violence across the jurisdiction to make fear rise and then appeal to the afraid public that they could help.

2
Bearjew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now if only we could find out who did it.

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now sue the FBLie

2
shill273 2 points ago +2 / -0

D'uh?

2
BulkBogan 2 points ago +2 / -0

no shit.

2
malooch 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was the saudis