1401
Comments (190)
sorted by:
160
magajew 160 points ago +163 / -3

I didn’t realize there was a forced hysterectomy policy.

89
TheImpossible1 [S] 89 points ago +90 / -1

Don't be an incel, women not being allowed to murder a child because it's the "wrong" gender is totally comparable to invasive forced surgery.

13
deleteTheGlobalists 13 points ago +14 / -1

They fundamentally do not treat the baby as a human life. It is literally impossible to convince them otherwise. Very sad!

10
Viewer01 10 points ago +10 / -0

well, its pretty easy, they'll just get mad at you. Just ask these few questions.

  1. If I were to run a DNA test on the baby, would it come back genetically distinct from the mother?

  2. Would the DNA test indicate that it is human?

  3. Do the cells meet the definition of life?

The answer is that yes, it is distinct human life. Then call them a science denier as they try to rationalize. They'll babble about cancers and so on and so forth. Conservatives and christians lose this debate because they reference the Bible as the source of this document. Instead of citing simple facts from a high school biology book.

7
waxonwaxoff87 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can’t argue scripture with someone that doesn’t respect scripture.

-1
PocketPosse -1 points ago +1 / -2

Dont have to. The Bible has a story about someone who didnt listen to scripture until after they died. He asked to go back and warn his unbelieving friends but is told "No, they wont listen to you any more than you listened to others."

The Bible is largely apathetic towards the success of evangelism. It only demands the existence of it.

Abortionists will not escape eternal justice, no matter how unsatisfactory their earthly justice seems.

6
Dumbkunts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah when we quote simple facts that’ll stop the left in their tracks.

It’s not like they believe men can be women and women can be men after all, they’d have to be lunatics to believe crazy stuff!

1
waxonwaxoff87 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won’t fix the zealots but might stop the next one.

3
corntortilla 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t need religion to be pro life.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm glad to see someone else also using these arguments with them. Like you said, anyone who argues religion or morals is just ignored. Argue the science above, though, and they'll usually pretend to ignore you, but it eats at them. They can't stand the idea of anyone to the right of them presenting scientific evidence that our beliefs are right.

-2
finalstraw -2 points ago +1 / -3

lol, you can also do that on your turd (before you flush it)

2
waxonwaxoff87 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they accept the premise then they or likely someone they care about are now murderers. There is immense skin in the game to deny.

54
Tycobbsalad 54 points ago +55 / -1

Or that men and women could have self Control or use birth control.

51
NotAPuma 51 points ago +52 / -1

Or take Responsibility for their Actions?

Nah, just kill Da Baby

8
DeathArrow 8 points ago +8 / -0

☝this☝

9
Seruna_Kanus 9 points ago +9 / -0

I keep wondering, a condom is wicked cheap, cheaper than the gas or lyft fare for travel. I dunno what the cost of Birth Control is, never asked. But still, a condom, used correctly, is cheaper, more affective, and more safe than any other "safe sex" method short of the no sex approach(abstinence).

6
WhyTee1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Isn't it funny how they never can afford birth control, and demand the taxpayers provide it to them, but these same people seem to have an endless amount of money to purchase drugs and alcohol?

2
waxonwaxoff87 2 points ago +2 / -0

Birth control is cheap as hell. A few bucks per month with any plan. There are also programs.

1
Seruna_Kanus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey man, a drug can rule a person's choices. It's the worst part about being addicted, nothing else matters but getting the next fix and enjoying it.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Seruna_Kanus 1 point ago +1 / -0

"not feel as good" weak excuse. If you know what you are doing it will feel good even through the condom, and even then, a condom helps with stamina.

22
Joequill 22 points ago +24 / -2

Lol these false equivalencies are usually a good laugh.

11
NoCoupForYou 11 points ago +12 / -1

There was forced sterilization approved by the SCOTUS, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. writing for the majority, for 40-50 years, and supported by Margaret Sanger and the Old Yankee Progressives. Didn't have to commit a crime or be obviously mentally ill to have it done, either. Most victims were poor White Girls about 12-13.

5
magajew 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is that happening now?

105
RedFoxOnFire 105 points ago +105 / -0

When he's deemed financially & emotionally fit to be a father it will be reversed.

Wow, that's racist.

41
Snooptwo 41 points ago +42 / -1

Lol for real. Call their bluff. Let’s see them go into the inner city and force young black men to get this procedure. Won’t have as many young black dudes with a dozen kids (this is not hyperbole, I’m the nurse that actually gets to know my patients, and double digit kids with as many women is not nearly as rare as you think).

5
aaafirefly123 5 points ago +5 / -0

They would be mugged within a day of arriving and shot immediately after their first attempt.

11
entwickelnden 11 points ago +12 / -1

but so is "planned parenthood" and abortion.

48
LiberalTearsMiner 48 points ago +48 / -0

What a flaming cock gobbler, I’ve given up on most media. I watch a lot of heavy metal videos and come here, everything else is woke and turned to shit.

15
TheImpossible1 [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

She's the person who retweeted. The original tweet is by some leftwing "comedian".

But yeah, I fully understand your feelings. I'm nearly there too.

38
conservativefrank 38 points ago +40 / -2

Nobody is making women have any procedure. Making a man have a vasectomy is not equivalent to not allowing people to slaughter babies.

17
congruent 17 points ago +17 / -0

Vasectomies are rarely reversible. Maybe 20%. False lie right there in the lead.

2
conservativefrank 2 points ago +3 / -1

Too bad his dad didn't have one.

34
RealAozolai 34 points ago +34 / -0

This is why Battlefield 2042 is one of the worst piece of shit games I’ve ever played. Not only due to the cringe ass specialists but the entire game just sucks and has nothing.

14
Suspicious_0bserver 14 points ago +14 / -0

I learned a long time ago to not buy these new games until I've seen reviews from honest critics. They stopped getting my money long ago unless they come out with quality game play.

6
13mizzou 6 points ago +6 / -0

Absolutely, I love racing games and laughed at people upset the new Nascar game is completely unplayable at launch. They just released their fourth patch in less than two months to try to fix it.

7
PROBE 7 points ago +7 / -0

I didn't need to buy the game to see that coming. The glory years of BF3 & 4 are over.

7
Bobsyeruncle 7 points ago +7 / -0

Very bitter about that. My all time favorite games used to be battlefield. I started on 1942 and bought every one and my trust the fanchise would get better each time...until after BF4.

I kneejerked and bought BF2042 pre-release and have played maybe 3 hours. Such disappointment. Never....EVER again will I waste my money on that franchise. Reviews a few months after release of the next one will have to be so fucking hysterically positive with heads spinning and Xi singing the star spangled banner before another dime goes to them.

All that woke bullshit from BF1 should have told me that they are forever lost.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
PROBE 0 points ago +0 / -0

I miss playing BF3 with my unit when I waa in the military. We all had it, and played together a lot. It was awesome. But yeah, it was the woke bullshit that made me immediately sever all ties with the franchise. Once you see that, you should immediately act as if the company is dead. There's not been a company yet that has survived an infection from the woke. The signs are always the same, and the diagnosis is always terminal.

5
CanadianFren 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its produced by the archetypical soy bugman. The game lacks soul because the producer doesn't have a soul.

3
dadmda123 3 points ago +3 / -0

May I recommend squad or insurgency sandstorm? They’re not battlefield but they’re much better than 2042, there’s also old battlefields, 4 is still populated on PC

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
RealAozolai 1 point ago +2 / -1

I still play BF4 from time to time, 2042 needs to be redone completely

1
dadmda123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, remove the retarded specialists and go back to classes, scrap all of the maps and make actual maps with cover so you can play as infantry and add destruction back to the game.

They won’t do any of those and will probably double down on their mistakes though, it’s what they do.

At least BFV had a decent game behind all of the retarded decisions and I still enjoy playing breakthrough from time to time. This one I played for 5 hours and i gave up

1
npc_NULL 1 point ago +1 / -0

santa claus on the battlefield and reindeer tanks doesn't do it for you?

dice is employed by a bunch of eurocucks

26
HappyHelper 26 points ago +26 / -0

Glasses, reddish beard, slightly overweight.. 95% of the men I've ever seen matching this description are sneeds.

5
SteelMonkey 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fat gingers are useless shites

20
Reclaimer69 20 points ago +20 / -0

But a Vasectomy wouldn't be reversible within the timeframe he is suggesting...

The success rate varies based on several factors. Time from the vasectomy certainly helps to predict how likely it would be to be able to put the two ends of the vas deferens back together; however, getting return of sperm into the ejaculate does not guarantee pregnancy. If fewer than three years have passed since the original vasectomy, patency success rates are around 97 percent and pregnancy success rates are 76 percent. But success rates can fall over time. In men who had a vasectomy 15 years or more before their reversal, the likelihood of restoring the vas deferens is 71 percent and chances of subsequent pregnancy hover around 30 percent.

There is some debate about the effects of antibodies on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. Approximately 70 to 80 percent of men who have had vasectomies will have antibodies to their sperm. However, these antibodies rarely prevent the sperm from fertilizing the egg.

This guy is pretty uneducated as the info is readily available.

Long story short, bad idea.

4
LoobintheToobin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, antibodies to your sperm is on another level. Maybe that’s why my freind lost the use of his member post vasectomy. The horror stories... ewww

17
SrzlyYUGEguacbowl 17 points ago +17 / -0

If we were asking women to surgically remove all their eggs to prevent abortion his argument would make total sense. But, we're not. So he's just coming off as a jackass.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
TheImpossible1 [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

They're no better as people.

11
cyber_acolyte 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm new to this. How does a vasectomy compare to crushing a baby's skull and sucking it's brains out?

6
entwickelnden 6 points ago +7 / -1

because righteous indignation.

2
TheImpossible1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because it's okay when women do it.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
9
davidmode 9 points ago +10 / -1

Here's a simpler method: dont let dudes jizz in you

2
entwickelnden 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly. how about dont get preggo until youre ready? its pretty freakin easy, speaking of body autonomy. If you cant control yourself, then you have no argument of body autonomy anyways.

4
RustyShacklefordsMom 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s very easy to not get pregnant and not all that easy to get pregnant. Why anyone would have sex with a stranger without a condom is absolutely mind blowing to me.

8
TehAgent 8 points ago +8 / -0

Battlefield is garbage. Want a game with massive battles? Class based Infantry, multiple different types of tanks, 4wd vehicles, fighters, bombers and troop transports allllll duking it out on the same battlefield? Download Planetside 2. Its old but gold. Thriving population on US Servers. Battlefield games are like Wal Mart Planetside 2. And theres no matches, you just continue battling over bases across a ridiculously massive map. Like 'its not remotely feasible to walk across this map' size.

4
JLCan 4 points ago +4 / -0

I found a fren on here! I've loved Battlefield since the beginning and had to refund 2042.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Planetside 2... I played it for like three years. I've never seen a studio game with such utterly fucked game balance. Even if I wanted to say "the VS got saddled with some amazingly shitty weapons and unfair overnerfs (lol Lancer)" who knows, because every year they'd do a balance pass and break some other weapons for someone else in new and interesting ways.

2
TehAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

VS has the best weapons hands down. Ive been playing for 9 years and at no point has an entire faction suffered some kind of wide sweeping weapon nerf or experienced having crappy guns. Every faction has its meta guns, its average use guns, and its very niche guns.

It sounds more like you never really learned the game and blame the guns for bad performance. Trying to do the wrong thing with the wrong gun will send you back to respawn pretty quickly.

Dont get me wrong; the game isnt perfectly balanced and at times suffers from the same technique other developers use to sell stuff; release an OP weapon and then nerf it a couple few weeks later.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol VS had a MAX ability that was overpowered for like 8 months 6 years ago and it got so nerfed it was impossible to ever find anyone using it, and for 6 years since everyone claimed it was okay to be useless because it was overpowered for a short time before nearly anyone currently playing had even played the game.

It was like the 'racial equity' of Planetside 2. "My ancestors had it hard before I was born, so you owe us decades of retribution now."

All anyone did was cry about the Orion.

2
TehAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now they cry about the Betelgeuse 🤣

I do remember the VS Max nerf and people do still use ZOE. It was more of a perspective thing - to VS it was over nerfed, so most others it was like haha fuck you; you all abused this for a long time. The same thing happened with the NC Max shotgun nerfs. The ZOE nerf was slightly over nerfed but nothing like you feel like it was. It was just so absurdly OP for so long that once it was brought more into line, it was such a dramatic difference that VS players felt shit on. Yes as a long time VS player - more hours than my ASP 100 NC - both the Max and the Lancer nerfs were well warranted, and not perfect, but landed in good places after tweaking. Nerfs and OP weapons are nothing new - to any game. I even joked about the pre nerf Striker on how the rockets were circling the warpgate waiting for me to come back and blew up my Scythe…and someone thought it was true.

I have ASP 100 NC and VS characters and am working on the TR now. VS was flat out by far the smoothest ride to Br100 twice. (If ASP wasn’t a thing when you played it’s basically prestige - you reset your battle tank but also get some nice perks when leveling back up)

The game today is better than it’s ever been before minus a couple stupid changes. Light Assaults have this little fucking rocket launcher that they have no business having, and some of the vehicle changes were ass like recently giving Python AP the same gravity as HESH rounds. Wrel is an idiot that makes balance changes that suit his personal play style. They recently release a crossbow with explosive rounds that everyone KNEW was OP yet it still made it to live after time in the test server.

All that said the game is still fun as hell and nothing out there comes close to touching it.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with ZOE is it was only good for a movement buff. The extra damage mathematically didn't matter, it was still the same shots to kill.

The issue was Charge was also a movement buff but it didn't make you take 20% more damage. So why use ZOE?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
Kansityshuffle88 8 points ago +9 / -1

I don't think it should be guided towards any gender specifically

I think it should be guided towards welfare recipients

You can get welfare for 90 days. After that you gotta get nipped or tubes tied. If you can't lead an independent life, you don't get to bring more mouths to the taxpayer trough

4
GodSaveTheWest 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or we get rid of welfare all together because fuck the government, more freedom. Give the taxpayer money back to the taxpayers and they can donate to charity if they want to help low IQ people.

1
Kansityshuffle88 1 point ago +1 / -0

For sure, there would be an abundance of charity help if people didn't have to fork over 35% of their wages to the gov't

6
DigginDeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm just gonna say it:

I can't wait until it's open season on these counts.

And I don't mean firearms either...I dunno if anyone here has ever felt teeth break under their fist, but it's pretty fucking satisfying.

5
entwickelnden 5 points ago +5 / -0

honestly, if we were allowed to fist fight more, there would be less shootings. Settle this shit like men, learn to become a man. That being said i haven't fought in years so im starting a bit of boxing with a buddy.

6
MAGAnology 6 points ago +6 / -0

I didn't realize there were genetically different unborn human beings inside of a man's testicles.

5
SeeWithYourMind 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's just another hollywood pedocrat

4
Mtnlion667 4 points ago +6 / -2

Lying on my back w frozen peas between my legs at the moment since I got one yesterday.

Forcing anyone to have any surgery is f'n insane, I'm just a bit "sensitive"to that particular one at the.moment🤣

And thank God there weren't regulations to deem when I was ready to be a father or I wouldn't have the perfect daughter that I do.

4
NamendaBiden 4 points ago +4 / -0

What a racist!! A huge segment of the African American community will never be financially secure enough to support children. Why does this racist want to eliminate the African American community in the country?!

4
Avenatti2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Translation: “look wahmen, I totally have your back! May I have a crumb of pussy now please?”

Beta cuck

3
no_money 3 points ago +3 / -0

Vasectomies are reversible but their success rate is determined by how long it has been since you had a vasectomy. An 18 year old who has a vasectomy will likely be unable to father a child by the time they're 25.

As someone who is dealing with fertility clinics to have a second child, and am well versed in all of the problems associated with pregnancy, the left seems to require ignorance on fertility to promote their policies. After the age of 30 fertility problems become more common, they become the norm over the age of 35, and getting pregnant after 40 is difficult. Adding self induced fertility problems would be idiotic.

3
evenbiggerchubbys 3 points ago +3 / -0

FAGGOT alert. Here comes the white nighty

3
Godred_Crovan 3 points ago +3 / -0

When did the gaming industry become overrun with leftist faggots and obese feminists?

1
Morris_The_Grey 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure but I'm glad I don't buy it even play new games. I still remember a GameStop commercial that told you to pre order a gears of war game and you will receive a gold gun. That was the beginning of the end.

3
turdinthepunch 3 points ago +3 / -0

No the thought of killing babies makes me uncomfortable.

3
FetusSandwich 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just as an FYI, this tweet is from a self-proclaimed “communist comedian.” Marie Bustgaard Granlund (the person seen retweeting it two weeks prior to launch) is the radical feminist associate producer of the game.

2
TheImpossible1 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can a mod pin this, please.

3
ccxn 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's just mad his game was the worst game of all time

3
Friend_of_John_Galt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every woman should ask for Vas passports before having sex with a man. A man should maintain documentation on his person he won't pass on parenthood to someone else.

Who am I kidding. This dude would absolutely keep papers proving he's snipped or advocate baby killing if it meant maybe having a woman look at him.

1
Suspicious_0bserver 1 point ago +1 / -0

KEK! 🤣

3
JLCan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Battlefield 2042 is so fucking bad as a game, forget the bugs.

3
Monsieur_Novembre 3 points ago +4 / -1

Try to tell that to people in Africa and see how fast you end up with your head on the spike of « anti-racism »

3
h4yw1r3_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm just fine with free vasectomies for young males

1
Behindleftlines 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they were 100% truly reversible I would be all over it, but it's more like 70%, and the longer you have had it the lower the chances are.

1
Mtnlion667 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It's tough for young guys to get them at all.

I've got a friend in his early 20s that was refused by 2 different Drs when he tried to get it done.

I just got one yesterday because I've wanted one and finally met my insurance deductible after 2 ankle surgeries so it was very cheap. I'm 44 and already have an amazing daughter, they still ask many questions that try to push you away from getting it. Even on the table, ready to go, the Dr asked for final consent before she made the first incision.

If only they were this concerned before pushing all their "sex education" that involves threesomes and multiple sexualities on today's youth.

3
Bot-not1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, he's got the 'idiot' part right in his screen name...

2
heeeeeemeyer 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's assuming only men have testicles. What a bigot.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Siteless_Vagrant 2 points ago +2 / -0

TIL having a child is the same as mutilation.

2
Whatyougotson 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is it w those faggots and forced surgeries/injections/anything.

2
QanonIsMyDad 2 points ago +2 / -0

And this is why his game is a flaming piece of dog shit rn and no one is buying it. Game is literally already “on sale” @ Amazon and other retailers 🤣🤣

2
mainsoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they really still sticking to that old idea that the babies body, with distinct DNA and arms and legs and fingers and toes, is the same as the mothers body? Weak.

2
EagleOverTriumph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the fuck can people just NOT have sex? I don't even think they bring up the option of abstinence anymore.

2
todayabetterme 2 points ago +3 / -1

Wouldn't the equivalent be requiring a man to take care of his child? I'm not sure what's wrong with that.

2
CLaRGe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Forced hysterectomy is grounds for self defense. He may as well have suggested forced castrations.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
wololo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did the idea of regulating a man's body make you uncomfortable?

I guess he's never heard of routine infant circumcision, which, in the U.S., is literally forced on baby boys--and only boys, as girls' genitals are legally protected from cutting--and is an irreversible surgery without medical indication. What a tool.

2
Kinkinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

The worst part is the arguments you hear in support of this stone age barbarity. "It looks better," is even more disgusting than "it's easier to keep clean."

2
Asael 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol it's like these people are made of false equivalence fallacies. I swear, it's like some sort of mass psychosis going on but it's the Dunning Kruger Effect. Your fucking testicles aren't a living person.

An actual equivalent parallel would be, "make every young man keep it in his pants until he's deemed financially & emotionally fit to be a father."

Wittyidiot is a fitting name. Well, except the witty part.

2
I_Love_45-70_Gov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Figures... The original BF 1942 was the only really good BF

BF 2 was also great for online play but for the insane amount of cheating and EA completely ignoring and doing nothing about it. So BF 2 became a shit game...walked away for good from that franchise for that reason.

1
LowKeyPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they are allowed to mandate vaccines, there is no medical procedure they won't mandate for the greater good.

1
waxonwaxoff87 1 point ago +1 / -0

Protected status.

1
Cdub 1 point ago +3 / -2

I’m actually not against this…sorta. I would be ok with my son getting snipped with his consent. Save him the baby mama child support trap untill he’s ready to start a family.

4
Chopblock 4 points ago +5 / -1

Found the McConnell staffer

1
seilgu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do commies and homosexuals always look identical?

1
JZSquared 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here we go again with another false equivalency.

1
ColbyP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting your tubes tied is also reversible, so unless you're advocating for that as well, you're making a logical fallacy strawman argument. It's either both, or neither. If you're going to be a faggot, at least be consistent.