1708
Comments (216)
sorted by:
67
Dirk_Diggler 67 points ago +67 / -0

Sounds like they could use some “diversity”, I am sure there are a few million illegal aliens that could “spruce up” the place. I am absolutely positive crime won’t go up and property values won’t come down.

31
ModernKnight 31 points ago +31 / -0

They're definitely pushing this in Maine. Portland, Maine has had a HUGE influx of refugees in recent years.

14
Jmradioman 14 points ago +14 / -0

The "refugees" never stay, they run south as soon as they can.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
12
Omikron 12 points ago +14 / -2

I just moved to a place that's extremely cold. People ask me why I moved here. One of the reasons was to get away from non-whites. I was tired of all the good jobs going to some joke educated affirmative action hire that can't even tie their own shoelaces. I am racist btw, not race neutral like a lot of you guys. It has been a great success. There's some Asians here and 1 black person but all the non-whites hate it here and want out.

5
based_trekkie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Asians can handle the cold, I think it is because they were forged in the Asian glacial steppes and then when they migrated south they formed China and their acquired traits led them to develop civilization in china.

Far South / equatorial Asians, ie. Indonesians are basically the "mexicans and africans" of asia and the IQ levels do drop for them.

3
JLPWave 3 points ago +3 / -0

First off let me state that It is every races right to grow up among their own kind. Be it Asian, Black, White, or Semite. I don't think that anything positive has come out of mixing the races within one nation. The more diverse a culture becomes the more the social trust erodes. To this day nobody can explain to me how occupying a country with people I have the least amount in common with is a positive thing for myself, our communities or future generations.

I believe that the only way to true long lasting harmony is the separation of the races. No more oppression. no more racism. no more inequity, no more rioting, and certainly no more grifting.

I am so sick of hearing that racism and inequality are keeping certain races down and I think that this is a horrible thing. I think that the only fair and humane thing to do is let people live life on their own curve within their own nation free from outside influence. I don't want anybody to be unhappy, even those that are different from me. I want a solution that works for everybody. Would this really be so bad?

Their are perfectly valid reasons for feeling the way that you do. Selling others on your ideals is all in the marketing. Show them the positive benefits to your ideals and they are likely to agree with you, even if they are currently unwilling to say so out loud.

3
rubberkidney 3 points ago +3 / -0

inuit tribes?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
c_programmer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Minnesota would like a word with you.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
obamadotru 3 points ago +3 / -0

not really, maine has a lot of public assistance programs

20
Rainman 20 points ago +20 / -0

The left is trying desperately to do so calling it a "white problem" in new Hampshire IIRC

Lefties say how great Nordic countries are, low crime etc as well until they learn 90% white

4
kilr0y 4 points ago +4 / -0

A full-blown commie activist I knew in high school lives in Maine now and he is constantly posting on social media about how Maine needs more immigrants and cheap housing built.

Civil War II needs to happen soon or we'll never fix this country.

2
GodSaveTheWest 2 points ago +2 / -0

Think about all the new food white people could never make themselves!!!! oh joy!

35
Logix603 35 points ago +35 / -0

Nh is not controlled by democrats, foolish people, nh is also far from Democrat majority.

13
Climbsurf 13 points ago +18 / -5

Vermont also has a Republican governor, and Maine is going to re-elect Lepage in a blowout next year. These states are not democrat controlled by any stretch of the imagination

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
8
JimzeBMk1 8 points ago +8 / -0

I will never understand why a state as white, rural and thinly populated as Vermont is as libshit as it is - does anyone have a good explanation as to why this is the case? I would guess a lot of white self-hatred mental illness, but I'm sure its quite multifaceted - if anyone could explain I'd be extremely grateful.

12
Paul_Revere 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's because hippies and lefties in general have been migrating there for years, diluting the native population and infiltrating Vermont politics with their numbers and their money. They are all trying to escape the shitholes that their leftist policies have made of their own states, so they flock to Vermont and do their best to ruin it the same way.

A few year ago, the natives ran a "Take Back Vermont" campaign to wrest control back from the invaders. The leftists countered with "Take Vermont Forward," as if the locals were just stodgy, ignorant hicks.

The leftists won.

In my estimation, Vermont is the most beautiful state in the Union, and my wife and I were planning on moving there after we retired. But when we found out how ultraliberal it's become under foreign domination, we regretfully changed our minds.

5
Silken_Sky 5 points ago +5 / -0

New Hampshire is nicer, right next door, and way more Republican and successful than Maine or Vermont by most metrics.

5
SevenThunders 5 points ago +5 / -0

Both of these states are ridiculously cold, dark and dismal, crawling with Lyme infested ticks and crawling with their blood sucking friends, liberals.

But take heart, liberalism is a self limiting disease. It always destroys itself and is replaced by totalitarianism prior to real reform.

6
caKAG 6 points ago +6 / -0

Probably a bunch of hippies from New York City and Boston wanting to be in nature that make Vermont a Blue State.

6
NorthernConservative 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why does Bernie have a NYC accent? He’s not from there. So many liberal nuts moved there in the 70’s-90’s.

There was a big rush of burned out hippies with 7-figure trust funds from NY, NJ, CT and MA that moved there. Further padded up when their parents died years later and passed down millions more. Then they get some half- assed joke of a job that earns $22K a year that they use to supplement their inheritance.

Outside of a few hospitals, a few universities, a few successful diary farms, and a few ski lodges there is zero legitimate businesses that stand up on their own and aren’t “hobbies”. You have people who sells bars of goat milk soap and knitted scarves and call themselves entrepreneurs while they are drawing down a $6M trust fund with 1 kid to raise or no kids at all.

It’s a permanent vacation from the realities of life that most of us don’t get to enjoy.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

re-elect Lepage in a blowout next year.

assuming no fraud, of course.

5
caKAG 5 points ago +5 / -0

New Hampshire still a Free State. They have not been indunated with Leftist Policies. They are a Refugee for people in Massachusetts that had had it with Leftism.

2
ElSpeedoTorpedo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This ^

18
Climbsurf 18 points ago +19 / -1

New Hampshire is a Republican trifecta (governor, senate, house) that has banned vaccine passports and mandates. We are most certainly not democrat controlled

16
Gnometard 16 points ago +23 / -7

It's culture.

Quit playing CRT.

You get some big cities in those states and BOOM democrat policies will bring the crime.

20
IchHasseSaft 20 points ago +25 / -5

Here is a simple chart for you:

More blacks and illegals = More crime.

Prove me wrong

15
Donaldino 15 points ago +15 / -0

Illegals have a 100% rate of criminality.

4
IchHasseSaft 4 points ago +5 / -1

Bingo

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure "violent crime" is the relevant metric, and that's what the other poster meant even though he accidentally a word.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

BY DEFINITION!

6
CentralAmericanPede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its true. Kick the blacks out of Philly and the crime rate would absolutely plummet even with the retarded Demonrat policies still in place.

-1
Cucker_Carlson -1 points ago +5 / -6

You sound like a BLM faggot.

"Prove me wrong[.]" Sure thing: attributing the actions of INDIVIDUALS to entire races is fucking retarded. It is, in fact, exactly what the rest of us are fighting when we fight against CRT and the "social revolution". You will not race-bait us, communist trash.

5
Bitch_Ima_Pernis 5 points ago +6 / -1

" Sure thing: attributing the actions of INDIVIDUALS to entire races is fucking retarded."

Are statistics "retarded"? Statistics regarding IQ, SAT scores, literacy, delinquency, criminality, drop-out rates, etc.?

CRT is just plain anti-white propaganda. That's why we reject it. But we don't reject facts, research and undeniable reality.

Is your user name ironic or just plain honest?

1
JLPWave 1 point ago +1 / -0

Critical Race Theory is to encourage both races to embrace separatism.

When ever CRT says something negative about white people our knee jerk reaction is "yeah well what's good for the goose is good for the gander."

-3
Cucker_Carlson -3 points ago +1 / -4

Can't you compose paragraphs? It must be a Mandarin-to-English translation problem.

YOU are retarded, and no amount of statistics will save you from that retardation. Hear this again, retard: YOU are responsible for YOUR performance. Your race is NOT responsible for your performance. You don't get to STEAL performance points from others based solely on your tint. Were your parents retarded, too? Is that how you managed to miss THE fundamental message of childhood lessons? YOU are responsible for what YOU choose to do. No one else is responsible for YOUR actions, including an entire race.

3
Bitch_Ima_Pernis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, boomer.

4
IchHasseSaft 4 points ago +7 / -3

Weird 13% of blacks make up over 50% of violent crimes.

Sorry facts hurt your fee fees snowflake.

When has being against immigration and diversity been a communist position LOL

5
ufkyflflfguio 5 points ago +5 / -0

But that's not true. It's more like 10% of that 13% committing all the crimes.

2
IchHasseSaft 2 points ago +3 / -1

True

-1
Cucker_Carlson -1 points ago +1 / -2

"When has being against immigration and diversity been a communist position LOL" LOL Ever heard of the PRC, shit-for-brains? Yes, you have! You probably live there.

-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +2 / -4

Weird, 100% of NON-CRIMINAL blacks are 100% non-criminal, while 100% of CRIMINALS are criminal regardless of their race. So weird. Sorry if reality hurts your fee fees, critical race theory queer.

4
based_trekkie 4 points ago +4 / -0

100% of Criminal Asians are Also 100% Criminals!

oh wow!

Even though Asians have the lowest criminality rate by race!

-3
Cucker_Carlson -3 points ago +1 / -4

Races don't commit crimes!

oh wow!

Individuals commit crimes!

1
JLPWave 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why don't you look up the statistics? Specifically 43B. Why does one race disproportionately commit 71% of all robberies? Does that seem like a normal trend that fits with the rest of the population data or an outlier to you?

3
CentralAmericanPede 3 points ago +4 / -1

Seeing as how you believe in the blank slate theory that the left does and refuse to believe genetics play a role in group behavior, then I assume you believe the leftist narrative about “systemic racism”, right?

If you dont believe in the “systemic racism” narrative, how else would you explain the difference between groups if genetics dont play a role?

-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is not a theory, fucktard: YOU are responsible for YOUR performance. Your RACE is NOT responsible for YOUR performance. You can easily demonstrate this FACT for yourself by doing stupid shit in your daily life or by trying to feed identity politics CRT faggot talk to the wrong hombre online.

2
CentralAmericanPede 2 points ago +3 / -1

Genes play a role in who we are. Period.

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

YOU are responsible for YOUR actions. Your race is NOT responsible for things that YOU do. Your "genes" do not define YOUR actions. Period.

1
JLPWave 1 point ago +2 / -1

He was polite and respectful towards you, he just has a different opinion. Why did you jump to calling him a "fucktard"? Do you feel that helped you win the debate or sway the opinion of on lookers?

-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +1 / -3

Ahhhh. Why are you digging to the bottom of a thread just to whine about the mean words??? Were you thinking you were on twitter or something, concern faggot? kek "debate": you stupid fuckers are beneath "debate". This isn't a "debate" , fucktard. It's a verbal whipping.

1
JLPWave 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you reading things on the internet?

Its my right to read what ever part of the page I want to.

I guess it could be used as a verbal whipping if you made a valid point first but the general consensus of the thread, myself included is that you didn't.

-3
Cucker_Carlson -3 points ago +1 / -4

Also, YOU are responsible for what YOU do. Your race is NOT responsible for what you do. <--- FACTS, not opinions.

1
JLPWave 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did that have to do with what I asked you? I am just reading through a debate and you dropped the notion of civility and jumped to ad hominem insults.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +3 / -5

"You sound like someone who..." You sound like someone who is either a democrat or a Wu, busy trying to get "whites" to accept the identity politics role they have been assigned by CRT/commies/democrats/the "social revolution". It's really pretty fucking transparent, shildo.

8
GodSaveTheWest 8 points ago +10 / -2

Culture is downstream from "race" and environment.

Genetic intelligence limitations also limit culture. Like how many blacks are content never advancing and living in huts or on remote islands. Or the australian aboriginals.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Humans only adapt to thrive by doing just enough to get by from an energy standpoint.

Tropical people have less incentive to plan ahead and think into the future and schedule things, but they also have to worry about tropical diseases, so they tend to invest more in quantity of children versus quality of children.

Because if they invested more energy in every single child and tropical disease wiped out half the kids, that is a LOT more resources lost than it would be to "spray and pray" there genetics. and that is a completely legitimate strategy for that environment. But when you drop the child disease death rate to zero that becomes a liability too.

In norther climates there is less disease, except for the seasonal type which is WHY whites have white skin to better absorb and produce the UV rays in the brief daylight of the winter to fight diereses. Also more planning leads to more investment per kid as if you sprayed and prayed in the north ALL the kids would die or they would be stunted and less likely to pass genes.

If you are a criminal in the north, expulsion from the community ( especially in the winter ) is a death sentence, so criminal behavior ( which is a legitimate strategy for survival, getting most resources for least effort as long as you can get away with it ) was selected against.

In the tropics, if you were a good hunter if you tribe kicked you out you could easily leave and start your own or find another tribe willing to take you in and if to took several years to find the new tribe to live in, you could survive in the meantime more so than up north,

2
JLPWave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Intelligence and problem solving go hand in hand. Whites have had it more difficult in cold artic climates and have evolved better over time to adapt. Be it preplanning for the winter or complex problem solving. Warm tropical environments leave people unchallenged and intelligence stagnates. We don't even need to look to the islands to prove this, we need only look to Southern California.

On the other hand some races evolved to be better at hunting. They had to hunt to survive. Be it to eat or fend off animal attacks. Their muscles developed differently than other races. To deny this is to deny evolution, to deny Charles Darwin.

-9
Cucker_Carlson -9 points ago +2 / -11

"Genetic intelligence" BAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA Sounds very much like racial entitlement applied to the Bell Curve. Sorry, faggot; you're not getting any of my IQ points to sure-up your 50 just because we might share a race. No, faggot, you have what YOU have and that's all you're ever going to get. Crediting yourself with the abilities and accomplishments of others based on race is nothing but 'social revolution' faggot talk.

2
JS_Mill 2 points ago +4 / -2

Where did he mention anyone's individual IQ? We're talking about groups of people and the averages that come alone with them. Many individual people from a group of lower IQ indeed have higher IQ. Essentially this sounds like the "not all" argument, which is fallacious. For example sex isn't male/female because not all humans a strictly XY XX.

We shouldn't expect populations from different areas to have the same IQ.

-6
Cucker_Carlson -6 points ago +1 / -7

"We're talking about groups..." No, you're TRYING to talk about groups. Sadly for you, your narrative exists only here, within your own rhetoric. No one is going to hand you a degree because you think your race is more intelligent than others 'on average'. YOU must demonstrate YOUR intelligence. You don't get to borrow that from an actual intelligent person just because you might share skin tone. That would, of course, be absolutely retarded.

7
JS_Mill 7 points ago +8 / -1

You keep bringing it back to the individual. This idea has nothing to do with the individual. I wouldn't be surprised if my IQ is lower than the average IQ of a different demographic. I don't care if it is, it makes no difference. However, the average of these groups does make a difference because it can at least in part explain racial disparities.

-5
Cucker_Carlson -5 points ago +1 / -6

"I wouldn't be surprised if my IQ is lower than the average IQ of a different demographic." I see how HUMANITY behaves "on average"; there is very little fucking difference between any race. There's precious little difference between the behavior of any human being along the entire Bell Curve. It's splitting hairs. You're all fucking morons. Incidentally, there are BRILLIENT people in their own fields who can't score well on IQ tests. There are people of high IQs who can barely function as adults. Look into that. 'On average', there's very little difference in any of this hair-splitting, unless a person is just a low-self-esteem bigot desperately hunting for a way to feel useful.

4
based_trekkie 4 points ago +5 / -1

[ I see how HUMANITY behaves "on average"; there is very little fucking difference between any race. ]

Right, so tens of thousands of years, hundreds in the case of some groups adapting to different environments and conditions, and they are all the same..... right...

-6
Cucker_Carlson -6 points ago +1 / -7

"You keep bringing it back to the individual." Glad you noticed that, fucktard. YOU are gauged for YOUR individual performance and YOUR individual crimes. You DO NOT 'borrow' intelligence from people of similar skin tone. You DO NOT get credit for accomplishments made HUNDREDS OF YEARS before you were born. Likewise, you DO NOT catch blame for wrongs committed by people who are long dead, centuries ago. We will not be race-baited into your social revolution scam, pedovore.

4
JS_Mill 4 points ago +5 / -1

You sound like a bot. Merry Christmas.

-7
Cucker_Carlson -7 points ago +1 / -8

"Where did he mention anyone's individual IQ?" Oh, SEMANTICS! That's the best sort shill bullshit. These conditions are obvious to anyone who has ever been a student; YOU are gauged for the quality of YOUR work. Here's the thing, Wu Mao; you don't 'borrow' intelligence from others within your race. You're measured as an INDIVIDUAL identity politics stooge, not as the average of anyone else. You have what you fucking have, and that's all you're ever going to get. I understand that this may be difficult for you to understand, following a lifetime of Chinese folklore and Chinese folk medicine, but it's true. CLAIMING intelligence based on race is nothing but more 'social revolution' entitlement shite.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-3
Cucker_Carlson -3 points ago +1 / -4

I would judge you based on the content of your character and your accomplishments. So far, your character looks like trash and your accomplishments consist of shit-posting identity politics. <--- The Big Fail.

7
latinolizards4trump 7 points ago +9 / -2

I really don't think so, if you were to bring in illegal aliens, refugees and black people into the states, there's no doubt crime rate will go up.

1
Cucker_Carlson 1 point ago +6 / -5

Illegals are 100% criminals.

"Whites" are not 100% criminals.

"Blacks" are not 100% criminals.

"Browns" are not 100% criminals.

"Yellows" are not 100% criminals.

A race is absolutely incapable of making a unanimous collective decision to do anything at all, including crime.

7
based_trekkie 7 points ago +9 / -2

Evolutionary turning of behavior can indicate TENDENCIES towards criminal behavior.

You should look up R versus K selection pressures.

-8
Cucker_Carlson -8 points ago +2 / -10

Still, retard, YOU are gauged for YOUR performance and not the average of your skin tone. Anyone in real, adult life knows this. Your identity politics narrative exists exclusively in a rhetoric bubble of online comments... and nowhere in real life. In other words, you should stop talking crap that anyone who has ever been a student could see directly through. YOU are gauged for YOUR performance. Your race is NOT gauged for YOUR performance. Don't be retarded.

5
based_trekkie 5 points ago +7 / -2

It you look up a World IQ map, you are going to see some disturbing trends.

If you look at FBI crime status, you are going to see some disturbing trends.

If you look at any impartially collected data, you are going to see some disturbing trends.

Does this mean we AN INDIVIDUAL in those "high risk" groups like SHIT when we first meet them?

NO!

Does it mean we are more careful when dealing with randos on the street in those groups.

YES!

Because past data does predict future performance.

2
JLPWave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I do see a disturbing trend. 71% of robberies are committed by a specific race. No other statistic on that table even comes close to 71%.

Thus far liberalism hasn't been able to figure out how to solve that problem therefor I think we should try some different solutions. What is that old proverb? The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing but expecting a different outcome?

-5
Cucker_Carlson -5 points ago +2 / -7

Here's the thing, though, silly Wu Mao: YOU are gauged by YOUR individual performance. Your race is NOT gauged by YOUR individual performance. Otherwise, you're spouting some CRT social revolution faggot talk. YES!

2
gamephreak5 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "Melting Pot" doesn't exist, faggot! Some races are more different than others!

I bet you think men and women are EXACTLY the same too, right? Do you think a MtF tranny puts biological girls at a huge disadvantage in sports, or do you think this difference is "neglible"?

Careful, your answer will reveal what your party and ideology are.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +2 / -1

You have to make generalizations based on appearance, you cannot easily gauge a person's accomplishments and performance.

If you want to do that, you are going to need to actually implement a "social credit" system linked to VR "google glasses" which will pull up a reputation score that floats above people's heads.

I do not want to live in that world.

Appearance, whether you like it or not is going to always be used by yourself and others when meeting random people on the street.

If you meet someone dressed like a thug do you simply disregard their appearance and go with the naivety of a freshly landed alien thinking they are like the hive mind back home?

NO.

Does it mean you act like a fucking jerk to someone based solely on skin color, no, of course not.

But it is OKAY to be weary if you do not have enough data yet. It is OKAY to have those thoughts. It is OKAY to use prejudice to make a decision.

It is NEVER OKAY to use prejudice as a justification for being a bad human being and to use it to actively HARASS someone.

Learn to discriminate between cautionary prejudice and malicious prejudice.

Discrimination is not a bad word!

-6
Cucker_Carlson -6 points ago +3 / -9

"Does it mean we are more careful when dealing with randos on the street in those groups." kek Picturing you walking around trying to determine risk by checking everyone's skin tone. Stats won't save you from getting knifed by a meth head, white, black or plaid. It's just not going to make enough difference, when the REAL factors are behavioral, not aesthetic: stupid place, stupid time, doing stupid things. Don't be retarded. Much comical value: picturing you trying to distribute racial background surveys to assess risk on a Saturday night. CRT shite.

2
based_trekkie 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, genius, but when someone comes up to me on the street in a "bad part" of town my brain automatically makes a judgement call based on ALL data.

You assume that "skin tone" is the ONLY factor.

No, it is ONE of the factors.

If I see a well dressed black man, with a well groomed goatee, in a business suit carrying a suitcase or clip board and walking in a confident stride I put him in low risk category.

If I see a white guy staggering around wearing disheveled clothing and hair poking out of his hat in random directions with a 3 day scruff carrying a wrinkled brown paper bag. That is HIGH risk.

If I see two people one white, one black and they are wearing the exact same clothing and walking in the same manner, etc etc...

I put the black man in the "Higher risk" category.

You know why?

Because the white man is more likely to tribally identify with ME than the black man would.

It is because of the behavior pattern of humans would indicate this tribal behavior that if the situation got bad then at the very least I had something in common with the white man I could use to "negotiate" a way out of the situation or diffuse it. I could say: "Look I'm white, you are white, why are you threatening me?"

The black man would see me as the "other" and this expendable which is WHY my brain makes the judgement call of "be wary as fuck" because I know at an instinctual tribal level that there is one less tribal commonality I have at my disposal to negotiate my way out of a confrontation.

Why is that I do not put the well groomed well dressed black man as a threat?

Well because if you have things and take pride in things, you have MORE to lose, which means confrontations are potentially costly to you.

Which means meeting someone like that ( despite not having racial tribal commonality ) is LESS likely to give you issues, and it more likely to reason their way out of any potential confrontation as well. So If I leave him alone, then obviously he will leave me alone as well.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +5 / -7

Yes, you found a democrat in yourself. No one would appreciate "whites" adopting your fucking CRT identity politics role more than you democrat cock-suckers, aside from maybe the chi-coms. You cock-suckers are here promoting THE VERY ROLE that your 'social revolution' has assigned "whites": 'Angry, white terrorists who believe themselves to be superior to all other races'. We're not taking the race bait, Wu Mao. KYS.

1
Jlin 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're a boiled moose

-1
Cucker_Carlson -1 points ago +1 / -2

You're a CRT-pushing blue-haired queer.

2
Jlin 2 points ago +2 / -0

TrIgGeREd much?

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrat policies bring in the sort of people who bring crime with them.

14
ThinkingAboutYou 14 points ago +14 / -0

They also 'gerrymander' statistics and make it seem places like Brooklyn, NY are safer than a town of 5,000 that hasn't seen a murder in 20 years.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +5 / -1

Maybe. Come back in a few hours and check how many deleted posts there are.

2
IchHasseSaft 2 points ago +4 / -2

Depends on what truth

13
Patriots_dont_kneel 13 points ago +13 / -0

So the real question is, why does the white race like socialism so much?

24
Gwoz8881 24 points ago +24 / -0

It’s mainly white girls between 15 years old and 35 years old

24
Patriots_dont_kneel 24 points ago +25 / -1

The 19th Amendment was a mistake

19
chelthing 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'm a woman and I concur.

Women's best efforts should be towards raising the next generation. Men are better at certain things. Stability in the home and motherhood needs to be elevated again. Never be ashamed to want to serve your family above an employer for a wage.

4
toqer 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think stability comes from having 2 parents. One to nurture and the other to be the last straw i.e. "I'm calling your father!"

2
chelthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. I should have clarified.

3
Patriots_dont_kneel 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well said. Women in the workplace are nothing but trouble in my experience.

2
alucard13mmfmj 2 points ago +2 / -0

The crazy white ladies are ruining it for the rest of the ladies... at some point there will be a huge backlash or the "pendulum swing back". Probably total communist or islamic take over.

2
JLPWave 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that is exactly what is missing. Its why the younger generation has no respect for their elders. Their isn't any more personal accountability or heart put into raising kids. Its all dump them off on somebody else, and then we don't understand why they come out indoctrinated rejecting our core values and beliefs.

9
Bullwinkle 9 points ago +10 / -1

Some of the worst governors/mayors are women. Not to mention the incompetent, worthless VP. Think about it.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said! Stick with what you're good at.

5
based_trekkie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because whites are better at it due to needing to cluster together during winter times and work TOGETHER during planting/harvest and building bulding etc...

The Amish are a great example of this.

Socialism is fine in a small tribal or extended family setting where DIRECT accountability for being lazy or reward for hard work can be immediately recognized and either punished or rewarded.

Again with the Amish they will kick you out if you are a lazy Amish who only shows up to eat but not to work.

The whites problem with socialism is thinking it can be applied BEYOND those small accountable groups.

But it cannot because there is a "threshold of accountability" when the group gets too big it is hard to manage, this again the Amish go off to found NEW settlements where accountability can be restored due to reduced numbers.

This is why we never see Amish cities as well!

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

That makes sense. Maybe that's the reason socialism is so popular in ethnically homogeneous places, like 20th century Russia, China etc and not so much in diverse places like the US.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

^ BINGO

Communism fails when you have multiple tribal groups "looking out for their own" and using the state as a tool to try to either get more resources or to punish other groups by restricting their resources.

It is why when Yugoslavia fell apart all those grudges under communism that were suppressed bubbled up to the surface in a very violent manner.

You can bet your bindle that under communism some commissars saw to it that some regions were more favored than others based on race and religion.

1
ufkyflflfguio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Local democrats in non-urban areas are very different from the national and city democrats. They don't push this socialist bullshit. As little as 20 years ago the same was true for most urban democrats. The Daley clan who ran Chicago were very anti-socialist. Corrupt as fuck, but you always knew where you stood and the important shit mostly got done so people put up with it.

And even now, you gotta wonder why none of these deep blue states ever implement the policies they want to force on the rest of us in their own state. Why doesn't CA have its own universal healthcare? Nobody stopping them.

11
deleted 11 points ago +13 / -2
9
DogFacedPepeSoldier 9 points ago +9 / -0

Those three states are also extremely rural. I drove through Maine and it took two hours to even see a gas station. Was far more rural than the most back woods parts of even my native Arkansas

Almost as if having humans live stacked on top of each other is unnatural or something.

2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jefferson was right.

8
Scot 8 points ago +8 / -0

Most Maine crime is in cities where 0bama imported Somalians.

7
ElSpeedoTorpedo 7 points ago +7 / -0

NH has massive amounts of people fleeing CT and Mass to escape communist policies. That's one reason why republicans control all levels of the state legislature in NH. Maine will sadly be lost before too long

7
Climbsurf 7 points ago +8 / -1

New Hampshire is an oddball politically. We have roughly 350,000 registered democrats, 350,000 registered republicans, and almost 400k independents. Our state is the most free in the nation due to the big libertarian presence. We have the best gun laws, lowest taxes, banned vaccine mandates and passports, and continually make the Massachusetts fags seethe with our freedom. We also have badass surf and rock climbing

7
AnPrim 7 points ago +7 / -0

Most free state is debatable and worth reading about (been doing a lot of that because I need to escape my tyrannical state).

3
Retard_Strength 3 points ago +3 / -0

i remember there being a push years ago for libertarian minded people to move to NH. to try to tip the balance in just one state.

5
WI-Patriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Free state project

5
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can’t help but notice these are cold states as well. I wonder why there is a correlation to crime here…

5
603taco 5 points ago +5 / -0

New Hampshire is not like the other New England states, it is a red state with a decent red governor.

5
Geeee 5 points ago +10 / -5

MUH STORMFAAAAAAAGS incoming

5
Tardigrade 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lefties actually havent used that counterpoint with me. Instead they say (brace yourself) that the violence is still the result of red policies in red areas bleeding over, and that we need a coordinated county wide effort of leftiness to really fix things.

2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's always their "answer." If leftism fails, the "fix" is to have more leftism.

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chicago blames me for their violence despite me being like 4 hours away haha. They say the only reason people in Chicago murder each other is because of selfish people in Kentucky and Indiana being allowed to own guns. Kinda weird considering In Kentucky we don’t need any permit whatsoever to carry and have much lower crime…

4
123breadman 4 points ago +4 / -0

They also say Republicans drain most welfare, but ignore that those southern states have black heavy counties where all the welfare goes.

4
Jmradioman 4 points ago +4 / -0

its really that easy to prove a Democrat wrong. We cant be nice, call them racist pedophiles.

3
Scot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maine also has constitutional carry.

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every state should. My state (Kentucky) also has cc and I cannot understand why this is not commonplace. “Shall not be infringed” is interpreted weird by New York lol.

3
thomaseniac 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's with the blue box over the characters?

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is from a political compass themed group. People repost memes but assign characters colors on the political compass. Green is libleft and blue is auth right. I am neither, but I thought it was funny anyway.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
FightForOurRights 3 points ago +3 / -0

13=50

0
Fucktheatf69 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s more like 6/51

2
NotMyGovernor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Erm why is that one pic not in English? Who are “the left” meme makers?

2
tree_sloth4 2 points ago +2 / -0

I genuinely feel sorry for average upstanding blacks. Imagine a tiny subset of your demographic committing crimes at such a high rate that they're the dominant factor.

2
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never turn your back on blacks.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even Jessie Jackson admitted this in an interview!

2
FuckityWuckity 2 points ago +2 / -0

The european countries they celebrate over the US are also whiter than the US.

Sheep.

2
MAGAguerrilla 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's kind of the same deal with Nordic countries.

2
Tripin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Immigrants/illegals from hot or tropical climates don't want to live where it's cold usually.

2
dr_gonzo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I really wish people would quit pointing this out. I live in Maine and would selfishly like to remain under the radar.

And btw, Maine was once the most Republican state in the union. I'm proud to say we never once voted for FDR. In 1936 there were only 2 states that didn't. Guess who was #2? Vermont.

Maine being blue is a relatively new phenomenon, and like a lot of states, it's because of an influx of people from other states. Mostly Mass and NY.

2
djentropyhardcore 2 points ago +2 / -0

NH isn't controlled by Democrats. We have a GOP House, Senate, Executive Council, and Governor. We have Democrats for federal representation, but they aren't running the state

2
Russianbot3001 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never seen face forward chad before wtf

2
based_trekkie 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is a great comic because it exposes that there are differences between the races and there is awareness of it on the left despite the lip service they pay for political payoffs.

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's also retarded. "the left" (you commie fucks) are absolutely OBSESSED with assigning "racial differences". Conspicuously, commies in China, the DNC and those spamming this forum all feel the same way: everyone must be regarded differently based on RACE rather than basing treatment on INDIVIDUAL behavior. Funny how all of you sing the same song these days.

2
based_trekkie 2 points ago +3 / -1

They argue racial differences followed by " Someone owes us something" because we wuz discriminated against.

Racial Realists argue racial differences to explain WHY things have settled out the way they do when institutional racism is taken out of the equation.

Learn the difference please.

-2
Cucker_Carlson -2 points ago +1 / -3

"Learn the difference please." Here's what I just learned: fallaciously assigning motive in a limp attempt to discern one mob of identity politics crybabies from another mob of identity politics crybabies is some extremely queer worming around.

Do better.

2
JS_Mill 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of the small crime rate in those safe states, what demographic is represented most?

2
ScottyGunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lack of joggers does that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Groundpounder 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s OK 👌

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +2 / -1

The five most dangerous states in the US according to crime statistics are Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, and Texas

1
Kerra_Holt 1 point ago +2 / -1

They also happen to be THE MOST "DIVERSE" states.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Those would be California, Texas (except this one), Hawaii, New Jersey, and New York.

Florida is number 8

Mississippi, Louisiana, and Arkansas don't even crack the top 20.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if you discount high populations of Asians? I suspect the guy you replied to was referring to the 13% who do 52% of violent crime when he said diversity.

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

I can’t just assume his meaning. He said diverse and I researched diversity.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you intentionally ignoring context?

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nope

1
Kerra_Holt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then please tell me where these cities are located;

https://www.roadsnacks.net/most-dangerous-cities/

Then explain to me why Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida, Arkansas, and Texas are the most dangerous states according to crime statistics.

Although none of those cities are in Texas or Florida, it isn't difficult to see why Texas makes the list when you consider the southern regions of Texas along the Mexico border are filled with human trafficking (which is a crime too). Florida is pretty self explanatory when you consider the kinds of people flooding into that state and the gang related BS as a result.

-2
Im-Wide-Awake -2 points ago +1 / -3

All I can tell you is I looked up the crime stats and those were the most dangerous states.

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mississippi and Louisiana are absolute shit holes, so I believe it.

-1
Im-Wide-Awake -1 points ago +1 / -2

And both republican led

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

So? Republicans suck too. Fuck off with the whataboutisms.

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

…it’s a counterpoint to the comic that you yourself posted. Why mention democrats in the comic if both suck?

1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

So…. If I dislike democrats and republicans both, I am not allowed to make fun of or laugh at either? Odd logic….

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +1 / -1

No that’s not my point at all. I’m just confused why you would distinguish one from the other in talking about states being democrat/Republican led. If both are terrible, why make the distinction?

1
ReformedSJW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hedgewik is like shitty racist stonetoss.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
6
GodSaveTheWest 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hard to argue, they are even dangerous to each other. The crime culture theyve embraced and champion (ostracizing even other blacks who dont conform to the culture enough) is cancerous to civilized society.

Anyone unable to acknowledge that is deluding themselves.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Strongocho [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is from a political compass themed meme group

1
Johnny108 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check the gun ownership numbers, too......

1
wwwchae 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did someone send this to the artist?

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its not so much white as the fact that those states have some of the most conservative gun laws in the country. Take Massachusettes, still overwhelmingly white, with gun conrtol that rivals NYC.

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

They also have some of the most conservative gun laws in the US. Take Massechsettes, overwhelmingly white with gun control to rival NYC.

1
Overtaxed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell Lewiston, ME how white they are.. it's become a muslim shithole.

-4
Cucker_Carlson -4 points ago +2 / -6

So, pretty much, you're doing your own, just-as-retarded, version of CRT. Attributing the crimes of INDIVIDUALS to entire races is fucking retarded and doesn't have a place in MAGA.

1
Kerra_Holt 1 point ago +2 / -1

Aren't you supposed to be sucking your DIRECTOR'S cock right now fagboi?

-1
Cucker_Carlson -1 points ago +1 / -2

You are apparent, blue-haired whore. No one here wants your identity politics or your cologne-stinking fake vagina.

0
Strongocho [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I didn’t make the comic, I just thought it was funny.

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

I didn't invent the phrase identity politics faggot, either. I just thought it was funny.

0
Strongocho [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why are you so butthurt?

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh, don't be silly, identity politics faggot! It's my pleasure to make you look as retarded as you really are. It's a joy and a public service, in fact.

0
Strongocho [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is a difference between racially insensitive jokes and identity politics. I am just reposting a joke that made me kek, relax. I am sure majority black areas are just as safe as majority white ones.

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

Meh. Don't care. Looks like identity politics faggotry. Smells like identity politics faggotry. It is identity politics faggotry.

Anyway, calm down, Cindy. It's just my opinion. Maybe go back to Twitter where you can ban everyone who disagrees. You're probably too sensitive for this freedom shit.

0
Strongocho [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Would never ban or block anyone, speak your mind, it doesn’t bother me at all. Not sure why you are so butthurt though, it is just a meme dawg, relax.

0
Cucker_Carlson 0 points ago +1 / -1

"I am sure majority black areas are just as safe as majority white ones." A shit-hole is a shit-hole is a shit-hole. I'm not going to distribute any census questionnaires prior to figuring it out.