3623
Comments (417)
sorted by:
317
RU_joe_king 317 points ago +319 / -2

Just another conspiracy theory (that happens to be true).

75
Flipakademsarepedos 75 points ago +75 / -0

ANIMAL KILLER!!!!!!!

42
deleted 42 points ago +49 / -7
101
FuckingWiseCracker 101 points ago +101 / -0

He should be burned to death just like he did to his poor, innocent, little chickens. Just like Fauci should be tied down and have his face eaten off by sandflies. Those who are cruel to animals, children, and the elderly should be 100% given whatever they dished out to the creatures they tortured.

40
deleted 40 points ago +51 / -11
32
HockeyMom4Trump 32 points ago +32 / -0

Now you are witnessing child abuse everyday with little ones forced to mask up and get clot shots at five.

8
Hank_Baxter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Irony does appear to be the divine's preferred form of humor.

-2
Bdbdbdbdbfffbrnfbr5 -2 points ago +2 / -4

we need 4chan on this

they could've done like with shia labeouf and snuck into the farm

14
FuckingWiseCracker 14 points ago +14 / -0

Retired public servant here, couldn't stand it, it made me sick.

7
Lady_MaGa 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dang!

7
TheDespotofCartoons 7 points ago +7 / -0

Damn, Doc, now I’m wishing you’d stayed in law enforcement for that very reason! Too many abusive sociopaths these days…

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wasn’t there a Charles Bronson movie about that?

8
TheDespotofCartoons 8 points ago +8 / -0

ACKTUALLYYYY…there was a series of Charles Bronson movies about that, Death Wish. It was remade a few years ago starring Bruce Willis.

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +6 / -0

cool

you can shoot someone then remove the bullet and sew them up

2
IAbsolutelyDare 2 points ago +2 / -0

<taps head meme>

8
TheyLETyougrabit 8 points ago +8 / -0

Those who are cruel to animals, children, and the elderly should be 100% given whatever they dished out to the creatures they tortured.

  • me having flashbacks to live tissue labs in the army *

"Yeah, totally"

[Sweating intensifies]

6
CelesteD 6 points ago +6 / -0

He warrants this for treason alone, but to also see how little he cares for other forms of life just proves it. No fucks are deserved nor should be given these people.

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +6 / -1

ZACTLY!

and BIden should be thrown out of the White House and sent to live somewhere else

1
Fight4Trump2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah ... like a nursing home. The dementia unit.

2
Gnat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen.

2
pedepie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its time to meet the wickerman

1
Oppenheimer_DOW 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sometimes harvesting organs, skin, bone marrow and blood to give back to good hardworking citizens makes sense. I like the idea of giving back to society for atonement but only in the most clear cut cases of brutal violations.

2
Triple_Jabrony 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ib4 we unvaxxee deplorables get hunted down and Hillaryed by the elite for our pure blood.

1
Patriots_dont_kneel 1 point ago +3 / -2

Wait until you find out what they farm those animals for

12
Meme_Too 12 points ago +13 / -1

Killing animals for food is not a crime. Killing animals to cover up a crime is, or should be.

3
Triple_Jabrony 3 points ago +3 / -0

The chickens werent even killed for food, they laid thousands of eggs they where hero chickens.

0
Patriots_dont_kneel 0 points ago +1 / -1

The animals were his property. Also the chickens themselves were not evidence, so its not destruction of evidence to kill them.

5
becky21k1 5 points ago +5 / -0

cruelty to animals to barbecue them alive in the act of destroying evidence. One count per chicken. 160,000 counts. Death penalty

5
RabidZoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where's PETA now?!?!

4
Meme_Too 4 points ago +4 / -0

The chickens were collateral damage when he destroyed the shredded ballots they were nesting in. And just because they were his property doesn't make him less guilty of animal cruelty. If you beat your dog to death, you will be arrested. Some things transcend property rights, like man's duty to be a good steward to all of God's creations.

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you seen how chickens live and die in a industrial farm? Its very, very bad. Passing out and dying from smoke inhalation is surely less cruel than that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
bearshawksfan826 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't burn them alive in order to kill them for food.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would include you ,if given the need. EVIL

24
StoryTimeHour 24 points ago +24 / -0

Morally it was cheaper for him to murder hundreds of chickens rather than expose a stolen election

Politics is a cult

10
deleted 10 points ago +40 / -30
40
SquiggyMcPepe 40 points ago +45 / -5

You do know that Tucker regularly talks about the election fraud yes? One of the very few anywhere on cable news to do so at that. He also regularly talks about all the messy issues no one else talks about either like the real reason for the border mess in that its ultimately population replacement to dilute the white population down to a minority it their own nation.

11
StoryTimeHour 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't think anybody denies that he does great work on issues that nobody talks about

I think the complaint is that there is tons of evidence to the point where people are making their own websites to stream it and he would rather talk about the mainstream news cycles

It's more of an issue of standing up when it matters

4
ViaToil 4 points ago +4 / -0

I listen to Patriot radio when in my car, SiriusXM. What you hear out of several people ON Fox is way watered down of what they say on the radio and podcast that's for sure (Even Hannity has burst out in full anger/disgusted/fustration mode on there) and said things that if he were live on Fox, they would of booted him there and then. I am hoping that, all the people making those offshoot web sites and such are doing so because they are prepping to still be able to have a voice in the future. Make them now.. let people know they are there so to be able to transfer an audience over to them if you end up full blown kicked off the "main". The only Fox or any former "mainstream" I have seen over the last couple of years, have been clips of them, I dont watch.

1
SquiggyMcPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lou Dobbs stood up when it mattered and where is he now? Fired immediately for going into detail about the election fraud and no one else will pick him up so he is effectively silenced. If Tucker doesn't go into depth on it maybe its because he wants to keep his job so he can talk about everything else? Fox covers pretty much everything past the election fraud and thats because the owners hate Trump personally. Most of the establishment media regardless of which side its on hates Trump and many of them are not bad people trying to foist communism on us. They simply hate Trump and don't want him back in power even if it hurts them in the long run. Trump is a dire threat to their entire elitist media and political ecosystem. Remember those on the right wish to control us just as badly as those on the left.

1
AndrewLB 1 point ago +1 / -0

He talks about what is most important based on evidence, not bullshit MK Ultra theories many or the countless fake election fraud stories planted by the left in order to distract from how they really stole it and make us look stupid. Yes, there was rampant fraud where they then used fake ballots to back-fill the gap between the election night fake numbers in order to make it look legit as long as there isn't a forensic audit.

Anyone bringing up MK Ultra needs help. After looking over your previous posts, please do everyone a favor. get some fresh air.

2
kung-flu-fighting 2 points ago +3 / -1

you might be hearing 'white population' but he never says that. I do not believe it is implied, but that could be my bias.

3
SquiggyMcPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

When he looks directly in the camera and says "These people are being brought here to replace YOU" with an emphasis on YOU. Who do you think he is talking about? The minority replacements or the majority white population?

-1
Scooby -1 points ago +11 / -12

Look at all you cucks. Run back to FOX news and spread lies about Tucker being on top of the fraud... that makes you the fraud, Pierre Delecto. All you RNC faggots are little weak bitches who sound just like a David Brock faggot. GFY, corporation cock holster.

7
TrumpsWall 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is that Anaconda’s 4th accident?

-5
Scooby -5 points ago +6 / -11

No, I'm not Anaconda but you making stupid accusations like that just proves you're a Uniparty faggot. Go suck off FOX news with the other little bitches.

1
Barbs 1 point ago +5 / -4

Come back when your balls drop. Your screechy little voice is annoying as fuck.

-4
Scooby -4 points ago +5 / -9

Thanks for identifying yourself as a Soros cuck. You sound exactly like a Correct The Record faggot, because that's what you are, little pink haired tranny bitch.

0
SquiggyMcPepe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lmao. How would you know? You don't watch Tucker anyways? 🤔

0
Scooby 0 points ago +2 / -2

I saw one of you Lincoln Project fags post Tucker on here where he really exposed the truth about GA by saying there might have been five or six hundred bad votes. Do you think he hasn't seen the video of ballots being pulled from under a table and counted illegally without observers present? When is your spook faggot idol going to talk about that? He wont because he's a fucking sock puppet for the Australian born globofag, Murdoch. Is the FOX news faggot going to finally talk to you about climate change summits being held on Epstein Island? Is he going to drag Bill Nye the butt stuff guy and Niel Degrass Tyson over the coals for fucking children to get in the club? Of course not because the little bowtie bitch probably had to do the same thing with his baby fucking buddy, Hunter. Keep stumping for the corporations and controlled opposition Satan worshippers, you cuck. Be true to your faggotry.

1
SquiggyMcPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao. Take some meds buddy.

-1
Scooby -1 points ago +1 / -2

Thanks for sharing the deepest thoughts your mind is capable of, Mitch McConnell lover.

-4
16
BeefyBelisarius 16 points ago +16 / -0

Interesting. That article claims to be sourced from hunter's laptop, but also claims hunter has no connection to child porn, which was on his laptop. One of their claims is clearly a lie, so why should we believe the other?

0
FrontholeEnjoyer 0 points ago +1 / -1

No cp

5
Riolinda 5 points ago +5 / -0

It wouldn’t surprise me at all if they knew each other well or were even friends. Rush was close friends with a number of people that from my perspective were on the other side. Doesn’t mean his product was compromised, he just didn’t isolate himself. We still trusted him (st least I did).

Who here thinks “Business Insider” has any relationship with honesty and can be trusted? Can you not recognize a timed hit piece when you see it after all we’ve already seen in the light of day?

3
AndrewLB 3 points ago +3 / -0

they lived in the same neighborhood and kids went to the same school. kinda hard to not know the guy. Trump knew epstein, doesn't mean they were taking showers together.

2
Hank_Baxter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but that was in 2014, before the hornet's nest was poked by Trump and Tucker started going after these guys.

2
magafren 2 points ago +2 / -0

ugh.... please use archive or link cached version

17
xanax123 17 points ago +27 / -10

Clowns like you ruin this site. How exactly is Tucker Carlson “a cia faggot”? There’s not a shred of evidence to what you’re saying, you’re just looking for attention.

100% you still live with your parents, it’s always the bitter manchild.

17
hollywood_patriot 17 points ago +20 / -3

Tucker went full cover-up mode for the two months after the election. He only started to admit some of the fraud about mid 2021, after half a year of ratings crash that wasn't letting up. I haven't watched Fox since the Steal.

8
SteveRogers42 8 points ago +8 / -0

Tucker and Laura were in full”nothing to see here “ mode after the election. Lou Dobbs was the only one beating the drums for election integrity, and they made an example out of him.

7
Deplorable002 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can’t speak for CIA or not. But I stopped watching after the steal also. And anything I watch on YouTube is always followed by FOX news video. And… not the same after Disney bought the rest of FOX. Even though they are self owned, it’s like they’re in on the globalist goals. Kinda like the Republicans. Just pretend to be against it.

5
President_Elect_Pepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

What exactly before 2020 kept you watching?

I’m kind of curious because this opinion coming from people always sounds so shilly and forced.

“Right after 2020 I turned them off.”

It’s fine to do so, but if you like something there occasionally it’s ok. You dont need to play pretend.

Most open minded people I know might pay attention here and there. It’s not you you’re buying any of the crap they advertise for.

Turn them off. Why feel it necessary to tell others. No one here is being brainwashed.

The NFL is the same way. “Oh I don’t watch the NFL.” Ok sure buddy. Good luck going to a Christmas party where football isn’t on TV.

I know a lot of people who don’t enjoy it. None of them feel it necessary to spam that opinion or shame others into doing the same.

It’s completely fine to have negative opinions about something. I certainly have them. But rarely do I find it necessary to virtue signal about not doing something the same way people on the left do.

I know tons of people on the right who have thought Fox was terrible for like at least a decade.

I just don’t understand why people feel obligated to tell others about that as if our political views here are some sort of dogma.

We aren’t like that. And the people here who do so always come off as really fake to me.

4
AFLP 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oddly enough, many people really don’t watch football. Neither side of my family will be watching football at the holidays. I haven’t watched a game in years, like back when they were pushing all the commercials about not beating your spouse (as if commercials stop that). I don’t even watch TV. I do occasionally watch bits on YouTube, and Tucker is one of them.

1
hollywood_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can criticizing Tucker Carlson for Cucking out make me sound like a shill ?

What kept me watching Fox News prior to the steal? They were the only major TV. network poking holes in the Russia Collusion narrative. FoxNews was generally ProTrump in terms of the evening hosts. I guess I fell for the Hannity 'FBI Rank and File are good people' line for 4 years. I admit, I was tricked by the Uniparty Theatrics. I don't watch any TV news since mid Jan - now to get news I skim Redstate, RedstateWatcher, ZeroHedge, TGP, and ProTrumpNews, then come to PDW to see what is really going on. I tuned out on Breitbart after the steal, but occasionally skim their headlines now from time to time to see what they are reporting.

I subscribed to Epoch Times after seeing so many of their articles linked from ZH and PTN - they seem like the most neutral, down the middle publication in the country. EpochTV has some good shows, with one in particular called CounterPunch, and the host Trevor Loudon is committed to exposing the ties between the demonrats and the CCP and Communist Party of America. The stuff he exposed on his show is simply staggering.

I haven't watched a single NBA or NFL game since the kneeling began. They are dead to me as long as they kneel, and/or push the Marxist BLM terrorist bullshit.

One of the biggest issues of our time is getting access to information - and PDW has been a great source of info since I joined. Whats the problem with discussing our information gathering habits ?

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you’re asking what’s wrong with a “discussion” you’re missing the point.

It’s about people virtue signaling specific negativity which involves implied demands that you do the same.

In other words you’re acting like it’s a “discussion” but the truth is that you’re demanding ideological uniformity.

That type of stuff is the basis for what the left does every day.

It’s also fake bullshit. On the left and on the right.

You can cry “not me” all you want but NFL, NBA and Fox News ratings all tell a different story about how NOT uniform those implied demands are.

I think it’s better to just be real and say “Hey, you can’t trust this guy, but here’s what he said that makes sense.”

If you approach individual ideas as black and white instead of full networks / leagues the same way you’re going to expose yourself to personal critical thought.

In terms of the red pill critical thought is the best you can do.

It’s better than just flipping the switch and removing yourself over a stupid thought or action.

If I was removing things from my life over stupid commentary I would have logged off even this site here quite a long time ago.

1
hollywood_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just mentioned that I stopped watching FoxNews when it seemed obvious that they were in on the steal - that hardly seems like something that merits such a strong reaction. I didn't demand that anyone else stop watching - I do me, you do you. I haven't been researching the ratings, so can't engage in a meaningful discussion there. I didn't remove Fox News from my daily news habits because of stupid commentary - I punished them in their pocketbook for being a key cog in the machine that executed the steal. If I tune out, their ratings will go down, and ad revenue will decline. Its really the only tool I have to fight Paul Ryan and the two billionaire brats that have basically inherited the network.

2
AndrewLB 2 points ago +2 / -0

no he didn't. HE didn't have proof so he didn't bring it up and focused on stories he could prove. Plus its common knowledge that the owners of FOX put everyone on notice that if you bring up election fraud, you're fired.

6
maleitch 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah, we have a serious soy, inside boy reddit patriot demographic on here more concerned with edgy posts and dopamine fixes than actually turning the country around

10
unicornpoop 10 points ago +11 / -1

I took a year off from this site, now I'm back and holy shit the reddit soys that troll this site and hijack posts are almost intolerable. I've been with thedonald since the reddit days.

-5
Barbs -5 points ago +3 / -8

Yeah, this place is almost done. It’s not really the_donald anymore.

The mods let it turn into 4chan lite, so now it’s a bunch of shills and doomers forum sliding everything so we can’t have any decent conversations anymore, and they tear down anybody and everybody taking a stand on our side, because “they’re not pure enough.” Even GEOTUS himself.

We had a great thing going here, then the mods let it go straight to shit.

-1
AndrewLB -1 points ago +1 / -2

i was about to say the same thing. It's nothing but stormfags and 4-chan idiots.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

these same people trash Tucker, MTG, Hannity, Abbot- all of the major voices of conservatism

it's obvious they are here to discourage and dissuade us

4
ViaToil 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are the Nick F group from the sounds of it. I don't know whats up there but, Nick sure has managed to divide people, his group always come off as angry, to put it kindly.

1
Scooby 1 point ago +5 / -4

He is a CIA faggot. I'm surprised how many fake ass patriots have infested this site to run cover for a corporation who participated in the coup. Tucker is a bitch and if you think he's a good and honest person, you're also a bitch. Cucks, all of you corporate news faggots.

5
Kekistanirefugee 5 points ago +5 / -0

So angry lol, but yes try to change the convo about the subject at hand and instead talk about tucker who has nothing to do with this story

-3
Scooby -3 points ago +4 / -7

The subject at hand? I'm replying to one of you RNC faggots who are defending the MSM fag. You think we don't see you, you Dan Crenshaw supporting cuck? GFY globohomo faggot.

7
Kekistanirefugee 7 points ago +7 / -0

What does tucker have to do with this event? You shill faggot

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

he's actually Brian Stelter

1
Lord_Kristopf 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I am sure there is a modest baseline of organic disgust with him, what you see lately is a Shareblue-esque campaign to divorce Tucker from his audience. One can scarcely imagine how many groups and individuals would love to see him fail. I say this as someone who only occasionally watches a Tucker segment here and there.

3
anonymousdonor 3 points ago +4 / -1

MAN TUCKER IS SO HANDSOME IT MAKES ME FEEL FUNNY

WHAT A CIA FAGGOT

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker is the fox news in the henhouse!

go fuck yourself you disparaging hater

3
bigdickhangsright 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just a reminder: if you can prove something beyond a shadow of a doubt, it's no longer a "theory."

2
Mrsattorney 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, a "trumor."

129
GodKingHarambe 129 points ago +130 / -1

Hickman Farms also employs female inmate labor to work his farms. With "muh Covid", they weren't able to safely transport them to and from the prison, so they just lived and stayed at the farm.

103
Joebidenisacriminal 103 points ago +103 / -0

That sounds like slavery.

51
COCOMOJOE 51 points ago +51 / -0

With extra steps!

29
Seatacjoe 29 points ago +30 / -1

Sex slavery.

15
AmericaFloats 15 points ago +15 / -0

Fox in the Hen house? more like, Hens forced into the fox'hole...

15
Mudbutt 15 points ago +15 / -0

Look at the 13th amendment.

13
BeefyBelisarius 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yup, punishment is the one exception where slavery is still legal.

10
Meddlesom 10 points ago +11 / -1

Except in Colorado now... now we have to pay inmates to do any sort of work. It was hilarious how they sold it to the public too. "We just want to change some wording in the state constitution to abolish slavery. It has no real world application, it was just an oversight that needs to be reworded! Trust us!". A week later and inmates are getting a taxpayer funded salary for everything they do.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +8 / -9
38
Cameron 38 points ago +38 / -0

Because when you create cheap labor via inmates there becomes a demand for inmate labor

When there’s a demand for inmate labor there’s a demand for inmates

What happens when the demand exceeds the supply? Joe Biden’s 1994 crime bill, that’s what.

13
The_Expert 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ding ding ding, Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner.

6
4
Cameron 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kamala was a slave hunter, I love shoving that in woke retard leftists faces. They voted for the father of “institutionalized racism” and a DA that hunted down black fathers and locked them away forever, cheap labor.

If one were truly a white supremacist racist Biden and Kamala would be their heroes. That and Roe vs Wade that has resulted in the abortion of 20+ million black Americans. Democrats are really the ones doing all the legwork for racism

3
edxzxz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, she does come from a long line of slave owners.

18
Fundadores 18 points ago +18 / -0

Because those could be legit jobs that paid an honest wage.

17
AutumnCrystal7777777 17 points ago +17 / -0

Because then you're incentivizing caging people for the sake of their labor value, not societal safety.

2
unicornpoop 2 points ago +4 / -2

Is this farm a non-profit that benefits society?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
kt524 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well that doesn't sound like they were keeping them there to bang.

3
Ocineaa 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's insane

88
SocialJudgmntWarrior 88 points ago +94 / -6

My tinfoil hat has just been penetrated. We're going to need a little more proof than a picture of a burning hen house.

37
52
xanax123 52 points ago +53 / -1

There’s nothing in the article confirming the ballots were shredded and used for the chickens.

5
AlphaNathan 5 points ago +7 / -2

I agree with you. However, devil’s advocate, what’s the odds this is coincidence?

4
45ForEver2024 4 points ago +8 / -4

Fuck next your going to say water is wet and is that a coincidence.

5
AlphaNathan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I didn’t say anything. I asked a question.

-1
PraiseBeToScience -1 points ago +5 / -6

what’s the odds this is coincidence?

Nearly 100%. I say this because let's look outside the fire at the farm.

Let's say someone involved had a massive heart attack. You'd say he was poisoned.

Let's say someone had a fatal car crash. You'd say it was a CIA drone bombing.

Let's say someone was physically assaulted. You'd say it was 'sending a message'.

Let's say someone commit suicide. You'd say he was assassinated by Hillary.

Let's say someone was struck by lightning. You'd say it was an induced strike caused by chemtrail seeding.

My point is that it doesn't matter what happened... the conspiracy crowd will ALWAY invent a connection to a conspiracy. So what could have happened that wouldn't have you claiming conspiracy?

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
Wordlife187 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how many of those conspiracy theories came true? Because my Alex Jones was right jar is so full I had to start tossing coins into an empty pool.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

None did because a conspiracy theory that you have never provided even an iota of evidence for is not 'true'. That's why they're called conspiracy theories and not conspiracy facts.

Alex Jones also invented the Sandy Hook conspiracy and because he has no actual integrity, walked it all back, deleted everything, and tried to cover up his involvement because his income was threatened.

Also isn't your boy Jovan Pulitzer faking an anthrax infection right now?

0
MedPede2 0 points ago +10 / -10

It still has more plausibility than the Steele dossier used to go after Trump. CNN should be running Maricopa Chicken Coop Crook stories 24/7 for 3 months based on all the proof.

21
QLARP 21 points ago +25 / -4

Technically they have the same amount of proof, zero.

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +5 / -1

Since when do stories the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party run have to be true? Case in point: Harry Reid accusing Mitt Romney of not paying taxes, creating a scurfuffle, it wasn’t true, and after the election Harry said “But it worked, didn’t it.”

0
QLARP 0 points ago +2 / -2

All that story told me is Romney instructing his account to pay more in taxes then he had to, so he could virtue signal.

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look it up for the details

7
MasklessMarvel 7 points ago +10 / -3

right

chicken house floors are solid with slats in them so the poop falls into the basement where it is removed by a bobcat

so this guy is going to cover the floor with paper creating a huge mess and a lot of extra work

then he destroys his livelihood and cause major loss by setting fire to shredded ballots

2
JesusWept 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are laying hens. They need nesting material to lay. Also, they arent normally kept on the floor but in cages, unless they're free range eggs. Whether shredded ballots were used for nesting material or not, it is questionable that immediately after it was reported they were being so used, the barn burned. I'd withold judgement in this. If its self-inflicted arson, the insurance company won't pay, unless an outside arsonist is indicated.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

paper would turn into a soggy mess that would cause disease

laying hens are cruelly kept in battery cages or are free range

2
Overkillengine 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've worked at a raised floor egg farm. They'll lay in a nestbox with no materials. They may prefer a spot with nesting materials, but they'll use the boxes. Or anything resembling a corner or raised platform...basically anything that is not the open floor really.

1
MedPede2 1 point ago +1 / -0

then he destroys his livelihood

If he's on the Maricopa County Supervisors, his livelihood is fraudulent elections.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

no it was raising chickens

1
MedPede2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that you AOC?

vice president of sales and marketing

Clint "Arizonan from one of the West Valley's most prominent families":
"I have always been a growth enthusiast, but growth in the right way," he says. "With growth comes social, environmental and sustainability needs. "

He's about as much of a farmer as Hunter Biden is a glass blower...

Can't make an omelette without a few fiery but peaceful chicken coops.

0
Dingus 0 points ago +1 / -1

DONT ASK QUESTIONS

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

why?

2
Cameron 2 points ago +3 / -1

At the very least with the dossier they created their roundabout circle of “sources” and it took this long for liberal dickheads to “forget” about it once their sources turned up bunk and unreliable.

For years we had to deal with them linking Washington post and acting like they just showed us proof.

For people like me, and stories like this OP, I need decent source material so that if I bring it up to some Reddit normie liberals I can back it up and not sound like a conspiracy lunatic saying “you gotta trust me, bro”

1
MedPede2 1 point ago +1 / -0

For people like me, and stories like this OP, I need decent source material so that if I bring it up to some Reddit normie liberals I can back it up and not sound like a conspiracy lunatic saying “you gotta trust me, bro”

I'm no saying the story has enough proof for us to share with anyone who isn't already aware of how deep the corrupt deep state goes. I am saying, that the slightest bit of information that went against Trump, no matter how poorly sourced, would have and was used by MSM, like the Russian collusion.

The dossier was made to order with absolutely zero proof (other than Trump having stayed in a hotel). The details of the story fit Trump's behavior and proclivities even less than the chicken coop fire story fits the long term election fraud in Maricopa (which was obvious from the time of Sinema's selection).

CNN wouldn't run the story if the FBI, CIA, KGB, Mossad, and SCOTUS all verified it was true, even if the owner of the chicken coop confessed on live television. They would bury it, or run something like "Thousands of Chickens Die in Inferno Inspired by Anger Caused by Trump."

0
Dingus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just tell them to WAKE UP!!! Works on me every time.

14
T_DforTrump2020 14 points ago +17 / -3

Lots of words there. Any actual visual evidence of ballots under the hens?

21
Brucesky420 21 points ago +22 / -1

There isn't jack shit. This is the type of shit that needs to be nuked. Fake info like this is exactly how they're able to get away with it. They point to the crazy people saying shit with no proof and say "we'd be wasting taxpayer dollars even considering an investigation into this"

2
Live2TriggerLibtards 2 points ago +2 / -0

this x100

Man I love this site but some of the things that are posted here make my brain melt.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

Now you all get why I hate the conspiracy crowd so much.

They can't be trusted because it's only a matter of time before their delusions end up aimed at you and they stab you in the back for something imaginary. Even before that happens, though, they're a huge liability. They love to lie about easily disproven things, so everyone adjacent to them gets to be treated as a liar by proxy. They love to say incredibly stupid shit, so everyone adjacent to them gets to be treated as a dumbfuck by proxy. They love to make imbecilic arguments, so everyone adjacent to them has to deal with being strawmanned by proxy.

They add no value besides, I guess, a vote. Beyond that, all they do is waste a shitload of everyone's time, LARPing spy thriller fiction shit because their own lives are empty and boring and they like to pretend they're a hypermind Jason Bourne fighting against the 'forces of evil'. When in reality they're literally exactly the kind of person like the MAGABomber, a low-IQ unmedicated crazy schizoid living in a terrifying filthy RV covered with so much political shit that everybody thinks you're a psycho.

4
MakeAmericaWinAgain 4 points ago +7 / -3

I DO remember reading either here or on GAW of a Pede/Pede’s friend discovering these ballots in a dumpster on their farm. Then that same Pede updated the post about the fire that had mysteriously occurred

9
PraiseBeToScience 9 points ago +9 / -0

There was a story of one guy finding a bag of shredded ballots in a dumpster somewhere else but the entire thing looked staged as hell. It was exactly one bag in an otherwise completely empty dumpster and he took all these pictures before he even opened the bag which made it seem like he knew what was in it already. Plus irregularities when he was "reconstructing" the filled ballots where it appeared ovals were filled in after they were shredded, because the ink was on the cut edge.

The Gateway Pundit article being linked here has some pictures, but the whole Twitter thread with tons of pictures made it obvious it was a stunt.

  • It was one bag in a lone dumpster. Nobody who wasn't homeless would have any actual reason to just go 'inspect' it.

  • He took all these photos 'up to' the bag, but the bag was nearly the only thing in this dumpster, and it was a solid yellow bag under a couple pieces of wood. There's no way he could've known what was in it, but he took all these preparatory photos like he already knew it was a big deal. https://twitter.censors.us/pic/media%2FE1YtDNjVgAAV8HX.png%3Fname%3Dorig

  • He called a crowd. Someone else was taking all the pictures. Again, he couldn't have known what was in this yellow bag, so why the backup?

  • He made a point of being the one to jump in the dumpster to pull the bag out, even though he was a fat old man. Why? That would've been a serious strain in his condition, nobody younger than him could've retrieved it? Why was it so important to have a series of photos showing him specifically doing this? https://s4745.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/fb-dumpster-dive-ballot-composit.jpg

  • The ballots were all wide single-cut shreddings, exactly like the kind of cheap Walmart shredder someone would have in their home. Yet these ballots were supposedly found outside the election center... where they would've had cross-cut shredders. EVERYTHING government is cross-cut. They were clearly shredded on a cheap shredder.

  • The ballots were all in one bag, and anyone who knows anything about shreddings knows that they occupy like 20,000x the space of a single sheet of paper, especially single-cut. The number of ballots in that bag couldn't have been more than like 250 or so. Additionally, only one bag was recovered, and it was fairly small. However once he posted pictures inside his house, there were like 15x as much shreddings as could've fit in that one bag. https://twitter.censors.us/pic/media%2FE1jq6sUVIAACCvB.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig https://i.imgur.com/ariNQPI.png

  • When the photos of the filled-in bubbles came in, people noticed that sometimes the ink from the oval had 'bled' over the cut edge, suggesting it was filled out after it was cut. Other ovals had odd curves and terminations that looked like the circle was filled in carefully after it was shredded to avoid the edge. https://twitter.censors.us/pic/media%2FE1jrbh3UUAYXgm4.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig

The entire thing felt like he was trying way too hard to 'prove' it was all above-board. Like a kid who has never told his parents detailed plans about anything, who suddenly begins describing all these things he's going to go do that evening because he actually is going to go to a concert or something he isn't allowed to go to. Too much talk makes you look guilty.

0
QLARP 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well everyone has a camera in their cell phone.

So obviously he took a video correct?

1
MakeAmericaWinAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Iirc, photos, not of the chickens, but the dumpster and the farm, then the news about the fire

2
QLARP 2 points ago +3 / -1

So you would then post the photos immediately right?

3
4
SolidSnakeOil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Usually it's difficult to get pictures inside factory farms like that but that's not a factory farm. That's the open air organic farmer in VA.

https://thecounter.org/organic-chicken-contract-farming-shenandoah-valley/

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

"using old barns big poultry companies left empty"

do you see any paper on the floor?

4
SolidSnakeOil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you think their bedding has never been changed or the barn cleaned? And why do you think an organic farmer would use shredded paper as bedding?

8
farcusmcgee 8 points ago +9 / -1

There’s no evidence mentioned in the article that Lex Luther was hiding shredded ballots under the hens. lmfao

2
ObongoForPrison2020 2 points ago +17 / -15

Gateway Pundit? Hahahaha.

11
ThunderInYourHeart 11 points ago +12 / -1

I don’t know why everyone’s suddenly giving GP all sorts of credit. Remember the “Huge! Army Raids Dominion Servers in Germany!” story? GP pushes stories about big happenings and bombshells that never lead to anything. We were led into the weeds enough after the 2020 steal.

6
ObongoForPrison2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup. It's a sensational site for excitable boomers. I'm always wary of any source that essentially tells you exactly what you want to hear.

2
ThunderInYourHeart 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s embarrassing really. Go to gatewaypundit.com and search “Huge!” and you’ll see so many articles that start with “HUGE!”, mostly written by Jim Hoft. It almost seems like they’re trolling.

-2
SolidSnakeOil -2 points ago +2 / -4

The lead writer (and owner?) goes by Tyler Durden. You gotta take a sideways look at that site.

5
ObongoForPrison2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's Zero Hedge. Another shithole.

2
posedgeclk 2 points ago +2 / -0

ZH was a great site until they were "activated" around the time of the selection last year. I have seen arguments that the "activation" happened around the time of the coronavirus. They were the first "alt" news outlet that picked up the wuflu. About when the selection happened, all of a sudden, they went full retard liberal, killed the comment system, and banned long-time users en masse. Who was behind it? The CIA?

1
SolidSnakeOil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same picture?

4
Yawnz13 4 points ago +7 / -3

What part of the story is wrong?

19
Patriots_dont_kneel 19 points ago +19 / -0

Evidence: Trust me bro

It makes 0 sense once you think about it for more than 2 seconds. Why on earth would a farmer reuse shredded ballots from his election fraud gig as nesting material? So you're telling me that he was too stingy to buy regular paper or hay (famously expensive materials) and burn the evidence that could implicate him to serious crimes? Yeah ok bro.

-2
Yawnz13 -2 points ago +1 / -3

So you're telling me that he was too stingy to buy regular paper or hay

When did anyone here say that? Go on, quote anyone.

The point is that you don't refute the argument by ignoring the source.

4
Patriots_dont_kneel 4 points ago +4 / -0

So what was the point of using ballots as nesting material then?

-1
Yawnz13 -1 points ago +1 / -2

When did I say that they were used as nesting material?

2
Juanye 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s what would have had to have happened for the story to be legit.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is entirely beside the point, which is dismissing something out of hand purely based on the source is stupid. Clearly you recognize that since you seemingly took the time to read the article even just a bit.

1
45ForEver2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

When did people show evidence of ballots being used?

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

When did I say that they were?

3
anonymousdonor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know if any of it is wrong. But I do know it's a series of claims where I'm just supposed to believe.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not saying it's all true either, but the souce shouldn't matter.

3
Fenianlad 3 points ago +3 / -0

Source shouldn’t matter? Are you serious, Clark?

-1
Yawnz13 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Are you? If Biden told you that 2+2=4, are you going to disbelieve that because Biden told you?

8
catsfive 8 points ago +8 / -0

OMG, this was months ago, like everything on PW today. How is this even news to you, nevermind "tinfoil hat"

I never see you at the meetings

They were after the PAPER the ballots were printed on, BTW, if anyone that follows this cares

AZ uses some kind of "VoteSecure" TM paper

3
someoldcoderguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read that as "VoteSecure" TP paper.

5
3
FreeFlorida 3 points ago +3 / -0

im a salty army berserker i hear your name on the reeeeee streams thank you for supporting the war on freedom

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +4 / -2

Considering the evidence was on fire not long after the allegations were made, I don't think you'll get much more than the suspicious timing.

0
KSMOconservative 0 points ago +2 / -2

They're trying so hard to make Hickman into the new Comet PingPong.

42
chickeninoven 42 points ago +43 / -1

God, I bet that smelled delicious.

21
GuerillaYourDreams 21 points ago +21 / -0

Username... ah, y’all know!

8
Perhelion 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lmao you hilarious monster

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
36
ArizonaDesertRat2021 36 points ago +36 / -0

I remember hearing about this fire. Did detectives inspect it for arson? Does sound fishy…or should I say “foul”?

24
GuerillaYourDreams 24 points ago +24 / -0

Murder most fowl!!

3
ArizonaDesertRat2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy cow! Thanks, GYD. I must have been think of the stench of burning chicken feathers.

1
The_Emperor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fire investigation...not everything burns Ata fire scene. If you have tons of shredded paper all over a site, pieces.can still be recovered by investigators.

26
RoosterRaiser 26 points ago +27 / -1

I would need a little more proof before I jump on this one. If this is a confined egg production facility, it's doubtful they would use any type of nesting material. The hens are kept in bare cages so when the egg is laid it rolls onto a conveyor belt that moves the egg to the collection point.

10
MagaNV 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, i got some questions... #1 is it doesn't make any sense. "Hey lets take that proof of a crime we committed and put it in my barn". Why? Why not throw it in a pit and burn it or trash it?

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plus doing it in a pit would more easily ensure it was all burned.

A bunch of paper across the floor would not completely burn. Some pieces would be blown out from the air movement, falling debris or chicken bodies laying on top of it would smother other paper...

0
Dingus 0 points ago +2 / -2

YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED!! WAKE UP!!!!!

I have a Qtard friend. That would be their answer.

7
rocker94 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hickman's is a Cage-Free facility, so they're using at least some sort of litter. I work for one of the largest egg producers in the midwest, and for our cage-free houses we use wood-shavings as litter. Either way, let's say this whole theory of them using shredded ballots as litter is true, that litter is going to be unrecognizable after a few weeks or months. It'll be soiled and broken down by the bed of manure laid over it and likely eaten up by bacteria and what not.

Apologies for the long winded reply. As a fellow chicken-involved individual I have to indulge myself when the rare opportunity comes that something on TDW actually falls under my expertise lol

2
RoosterRaiser 2 points ago +2 / -0

No apologies necessary. I had taken a quick peek at their website and got the impression only some of the barns were cage-free and the rest were traditional confined. Thanks for your information. I raise chickens on my farm, but have only toured an egg facility, and that was decades ago before the cage-free phase.

2
rocker94 2 points ago +2 / -0

The company I work for is pioneering/leading the industry in the cage-free push and large scale Organic production. Eventually all of our barns will be converted (so you're right they may well be some of both) but priority has been shifting over all of our barns that we sell eggs to McDonald's out of. If you've eaten McDicks east of the Mississippi... You're welcome! Egg production at scale is nothing short of insane. It's been great seeing the industry and technology progress over the last 10 years I've worked here. That said, cage-free production pleases the bleeding heart consumer but it's a net-negative for health, sanitation/disease for the birds, the environment and production cost in general. /rant

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also consider how a fire burns... any paper 'underneath' anything else will remain unburned. Ever tried to burn a stack of paper?

3
Rathael 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. Chickens are kept in pens with floors that allow the poop to fall below. The nests line the sides of the pen and use either that fake short grass stuff or they use screens for floors to allow the eggs to roll onto a conveyor. Using something like shredded paper would be incredibly messy and labor intensive.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +5 / -3

they just had the shredded ballots there dude and set them on fire. Guy owned the farm. atheism aren’t going to burn that shot in the middle of the street, It’s not complicated.

8
anonymousdonor 8 points ago +8 / -0

"atheism aren’t going to burn that shot in the middle of the street"

What?

3
DairyBoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao yeah that ones a doozy

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
dtown88 14 points ago +14 / -0

The audit hand counted the ballots and nearly matched the count. I think the ballots they still have on hand are fake and filled in with no verification. Maybe the hen house paper were the extra blank ballots.

6
Patriots_dont_kneel 6 points ago +6 / -0

The hand count found hundreds of more votes for Biden and subtracted 99 from Trump if memory serves. Why did the hand count favor Biden, after we were told the machines were biased against Trump? Seems a bit fishy.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because the actual fraud was stuffed ballot boxes, either via vote harvesting, mail in interception or inflation, registering fake voters, etc.

The ballots are all real, we just have no idea if they are actually legal.

All the faggoty shit about Dominion and servers and Italy is idiotic and would be so over complicated and much easier to be found out by using.

12
AllTheWayTrump 12 points ago +14 / -2

Just another story swept under the rug. It’s a huge rug.

7
Leatherwood 7 points ago +8 / -1

Lots of pedophiles hiding under that rug.

11
ihavethingstodo 11 points ago +11 / -0

This was devastating. I used to only buy eggs from Hickman’s to support local. And then I connected the dots of who the Hickman’s were affiliated with. What kind of monster would set fire to his own hens? Has PETA said anything?

[https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/southwest-valley/2021/03/08/arson-detectives-investigating-hickmans-family-farms-fire/4630406001/]

Oh but it was fact checked SOOO... fact check

1
9x10again 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop it with the facts, our shills can’t handle it! /sarc

2
ihavethingstodo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Facts all day long!!!!!!

7
katsumi27 7 points ago +7 / -0

Poor hens. This makes me sick.

6
MohaveSkipper 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know, me too. I have layer hens and they're sweet girls.

2
ihavethingstodo 2 points ago +2 / -0

My friends parents have hens and they are the cutest. He will literally go sit outside and they all jump in his lap. They’ve actually helped my son overcome his fear of large birds. He was “attacked” by a goose at the park one day. 🤦🏻‍♀️

2
katsumi27 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s so sad. I want hens and have a nice farm for them. I’m thinking this spring I’ll bring chicks home. Which breeds are cuddle bunnies?

3
MohaveSkipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have buff orpingtons and rock hens. If you raise them from chicks, most will probably be sweet.

1
katsumi27 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks fren. Are they good layers and meat?

1
MohaveSkipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

I prefer them as layers.

7
VoltronGreen1981 7 points ago +10 / -3

Could have just set the ballots on fire in the first place. Seems a bit too elaborate to me.

6
EdisonHwy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Were there any proceeds from insurance?

What is in the fire investigator's report?

2
SeeWithYourMind 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the trail to follow.

-2
QLARP -2 points ago +1 / -3

If the fire inspector said it was an accidental fire then that inspector would be rolled into the conspiracy as a Soros agent.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +3 / -1

uhh… that’s is what happened you dumb ass

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +2 / -3

After shredding them and putting them under 10,000 chickens?

-2
Sumarongi -2 points ago +1 / -3

Who says they were necessarily under chickens? (though that would be a good way of disposing of them slowly)

If you just dumped them in to the land fill all at once, the shredded material could be recovered and reconstructed. If you spread it over weeks, covered with chicken poop, nearly impossible task to recover.

You have to dispose of the evidence somehow.

No doubt he still had bins full of shredded ballots (evidence) at the chicken farm. He was were about to get caught.

Just setting it ablaze in the middle of the street is just a little but too conspicuous

A ‘accident’ fire was the quickest way to destroy the evidence.

The fact that you are questioning ‘why would someone do that’? means the ploy worked.

Use your brain.

3
QLARP 3 points ago +4 / -1

But there is no pictures of the ballots.

A q anon person just made it up.

1
Im-Wide-Awake 1 point ago +3 / -2

Why wouldn't they just burn the ballots outright though? You don't have to burn them in the middle of the street. You can also just have a fire in a fireplace and burn them slowly over the course of a few days/weeks.

Why go through the trouble of shredding, then placing them under hens, then disposing of them in a landfill when burning them immediately would be far easier and less risk.

It makes no sense why things would be this elaborate.

-1
Sumarongi -1 points ago +1 / -2

Because it’s a shit ton of ballots. Burning then in a regular ‘fireplace’ would have taken weeks.

Also it’s Arizona, they don’t have ‘fireplaces’ or if they have them at all they are gas.

The ballots were already shredded. Storing them at the chicken farm is pretty inconspicuous. But they were about to get caught, so they burned them all at once exactly as you suggest

You are literally say ‘why didn’t they just burn the ballots’

They DiD ‘just burn the ballots’

0
Im-Wide-Awake 0 points ago +2 / -2

I get that it's a lot of ballots, but you honestly think they couldn't burn them over the course of a full year? It's absolutely stupid to think they would sit on damning evidence this long.

Also it’s Arizona, they don’t have ‘fireplaces’ or if they have them at all they are gas.

Great, so then have a campfire. It's not that difficult to burn paper. It burns quickly and a campfire is an easy cover for something like that. Using it as chicken straw is unfathomably dumb.

The ballots were already shredded. Storing them at the chicken farm is pretty inconspicuous.

You know what's more inconspicuous? Burning them little by little. You know what else is more inconspicuous? Disposing of them in small batches in various garbage cans. Why would they store shredded evidence when they had a year to destroy it? It makes no sense.

You are literally say ‘why didn’t they just burn the ballots’

You misunderstand me. My question is, why didn't they just burn the ballots earlier

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disposing of them in small batches in various garbage cans

Which is exactly what mixing them as chicken nesting material is (which already uses shredded paper)

You are literally saying, ‘why didn’t they do it my way’ which is exactly what they did

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

A ‘accident’ fire was the quickest way to destroy the evidence.

Except it isn't. An 'accident' fire is an incredibly unpredictable type of fire. You have absolutely no guarantee that it will actually destroy the evidence, especially in a big corrugated metal structure. You can recover stuff even from house fires, and those are fires inside a small space that is composed almost completely of flammable material.

The air movement and updraft from the fire would've blown a lot of this shit out. Dead chickens laying on top of some of it would leave unburned material. Just the simple volume alone would probably mat enough of it down to salvage some of it.

0
Sumarongi 0 points ago +1 / -1

Holy fuck your are retarded

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

your are

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

Who says they were necessarily under chickens? (though that would be a good way of disposing of them slowly)

That's the topic of this thread.

5
Carmen1956 5 points ago +5 / -0

If true, Clint should burn!

5
sir_rockness 5 points ago +6 / -1

NOTHING EVER HAPPENS

5
Yawnz13 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's almost like you need actual proof. All we have is circumstantial evidence.

4
FishyMan420 4 points ago +4 / -0

Where's the evidence that the shredded paper was ballots? Why the hell would he keep the evidence around instead of burning it in the first place? This doesn't add up.

3
MohaveSkipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. He/they could've just emptied a building on the farm, filled it with the ballots, and set fire to it. A farm that size has plenty of outbuildings that could have been used for the purpose. I'm not buying the 'shredded nesting material' story.

2
FishyMan420 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. And no one can provide compelling evidence that shredded ballots were found as nesting material. I wonder how this rumor got started in the first place.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also a controlled burn would allow him to more easily manage how thoroughly it was burned. An 'accidental' burn would be very unpredictable and in absolutely no way would actually destroy all of the material.

0
SwampRangers 0 points ago +1 / -1

Photo of the shredded ballots, 03/06/2021. Also, their discovery, and then the fire, happened the same day.

All, please note that, when this user requests evidence about something, there is evidence his request is insincere and fictitious. If he wants me to stop trying to dialogue with him about the evidence he requested, he could just admit that his request for me to do so was insincere by rescinding his request, but he has declined to.

The user implies he wants "good reasons", but that requires that meaning and reason and good should exist, and to know they exist requires defining them, and he utterly refuses to define the words he himself uses.

2
FishyMan420 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was shredded ballots found in a dumpster. No mention of a chicken farm or Hickman.

2
SwampRangers 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you've accepted my evidence that meaning and good exist? Good. Good is a bit harder to define but it can be formalized. Basically, the good can be defined as the degree of correspondence between two repositories of meaning (specified complexity), a degree ranging from perfect to chaotic. When DNA matches protein it is good; when it doesn't scientists call it error. All evolutionary theory depends on a similar concept, "fitness", by which matches of organism to environment are judged to be good or bad. When your life matches your conception of your life, we say life is good. When your intent matches your action and its result, this is good; when intended result differs from actual result, this is less good (worse by comparison). Because the scientific method requires the forming of hypotheses in symbolic language that match the concepts in the scientist's head, it is necessary that good exists for a good (well-formed) hypothesis to be recognized. Accordingly, every invocation of the scientific method is itself a proof that these assumptions exist in reality (existence itself, meaning, and goodness). Thus the universe of everything that exists is proven to be a repository of meaning and goodness, and so the existence of such a repository is proven. At this point we could branch off to discussing your interest in the is-ought question, or we could stick with further proofs of the aspects of the nature of everything.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you crying?

-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

What about the paper cuts? I only want chickens on soft straw.

4
IamM 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Word got out about this, and thousands of local black people ran towards it expecting free chicken."

1
bratt 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's racist!!! Everyone knows that Hickman Farms used the chicken manure as fertilizer in their watermelon fields. The people were trying to save the fertilizer source.

4
johnfist1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know about this one. Seems... too stupid. If I'm going to do something extremely illegal and dangerous I'm not going to just shred the evidence and leave it under chickens where workers mill around day after day.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah but you're also not a 77 IQ Qlown believer.

3
Patriots_dont_kneel 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their brains literally work on movie logic. Shreded ballots as nesting material. What did that save him, like 100 bucks? My 4 yo niece would call bs on that, and yet those people write and publish articles without stopping to think for one second.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +3 / -1

There's also the big problem in that chickens in factory farms don't build nests.

Even if they did, you're right, he's going to save pennies just to burn the whole place down? Uh huh.

Also fires tend to leave a lot of stuff intact. There would for sure still be some ballot material laying around.

This is like that print shop that exploded and everyone here claimed it was a bomb to "destroy the ballot printing machine". First, bombs are super bad at ruining evidence. Any hard drives would be for sure recoverable from a bomb blast. Second, why would you attract attention like that? Third, why wouldn't you just dismantle the old machine and say it's being upgraded and it just quietly goes away?

These Qlowns are desperate to pretend they live in a spy thriller fiction novel. Every fucking thing they believe is "cool" and is like a bad writing prompt. It's like how 9/11 Pentagon conspiracy has to involve cool things like missiles and staged explosives for the secret destruction of some audit team's paperwork, when in reality if you actually wanted to make people believe a plane hit the Pentagon you would just get a plane and fly it into the Pentagon. Then you don't have to worry about debris and crash damage patterns and witnesses.

One of these has to be cool and badass and the other is much less interesting, albeit more plausible, yet all the qonspiracy yards literally only accept the stupid missile thing, because they wish they lived in a movie.

1
johnfist1 1 point ago +1 / -0

indubitably old chap.

4
SpicyAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

What the cluck?!

4
SpicyAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

I call foul!

1
Dingus 1 point ago +2 / -1

fowl

4
Skankblunt42 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ok I heard about the ballots being stored on the farm, and the fire happening, but this stuff about the shredded ballots being used by the chickens to lay eggs on sounds like complete bs to discredit the story.

3
Mmanion18 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fried chicken and fraud

3
GuerillaYourDreams 3 points ago +3 / -0

In his closest, huh? Loses all credibility with that.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
RealmanPwns 3 points ago +4 / -1

Trump won but this is an accusation with ZERO evidence. I don't believe accusations that have no evidence with them even if the accusation if true were agreeable to my politics. Show me some evidence of these claims there were ballots there.

3
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any proof at all of this? Anything? Its highly suspicious, but there is nothing out there.

3
Medtex1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fires are so random...

3
Indianapede2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Source on this?

3
Ryan_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

At least this fire wasn’t started by Joseph Rosenbaum, actually no fires or rapes have occurred from Rosenbaum since August 25, 2020.

2
FAAFO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be common knowledge by now but I haven’t seen it…where’s the trail to show he was using shredded ballots in those coups?

2
Dantalian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrat operatives are psychotic, power-mad, demonic Cultists who spread nothing but pain and misery where ever they go. Half the time I don't even believe in God, but I have no doubt we are now facing an epic Battle between Good and Evil that will determine the fate of the world for many generations.

2
Trumpdup4prez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool story bro… where’s the evidence?

2
friedchicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s like they’ve been given power and responsibility, and now feel the obligation to wield and play around with that.

Like life is a game to them.

https://www.abc15.com/news/firefighters-battle-massive-fire-at-hickmans-egg-farm-in-tonopah

2
cptkloss 2 points ago +2 / -0

aaaand...he got away with it i presume? as they always do?

2
Sheprecon31 2 points ago +2 / -0

If this is true why the fuck did anybody not take this man down don't have to be law enforcement

2
AgnesDomini 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gasp! Those poor critters! But I bet the smell was amazing...

2
Agent_86 2 points ago +4 / -2

More winning!!!!

2
KillAllPedophiles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even Tony Soprano was disgusted at burning an animal alive.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

Horrific! Poor chickens. What a monster. He deserves to burn in hell for eternity.

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too bad all the evidence went up in smoke

EVERY step of the way, they are ahead of us, no doubt by intercepted phone calls, texts and emails. The FBLie is working overtime to cover the crime of the century

2
Mega_MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do we know this. Did one chicken escape?

4
TheWhitestOfFangs 4 points ago +4 / -0

The feds installed a "sole survivor" chicken to tell the story

2
Schroeder09 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the date on this? Where's the news story? Why do the mods allow this SH*T without the dates?

1
Pontius_Pirate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember kids, double insure your farms and triple count your ballots

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember reading about this here on PW several months ago. The ballots, the dumpster, Hickman, and the fire. I wish a chicken farmer would chime in here and tell us about commercial hen nests and what they use for nesting material. I do know that my local Dollar General used to sell Hickman eggs and now they don’t.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pissonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

All it would take is for one of those workers at the farm to have gathered a bundle of those shredded votes that are stuck in a corner somewhere and didn’t burn and turned them over to Veritas!

1
conservativecookie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine the delicious smell of roast chicken though.

1
ApocalypseWoW 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bet it smells DELICIOUS!

1
someschmuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Destroying evidence and an insurance scam at the same time. Lets make this man rot.

1
anonymousdonor 1 point ago +2 / -1

Many claims here, claims I've seen repeated elsewhere, with zero corroboration.