2582
Comments (396)
sorted by:
267
Gadsden 267 points ago +270 / -3

This is disgusting.

I foresee open conflict, soon.

169
Robigus 169 points ago +170 / -1

A lot of people will lose everything and have nothing else to lose... and they are armed. This doesn't end well at all.

135
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 135 points ago +136 / -1

Actually, it does end well.

The tree of Liberty will be watered again, and our children's children may stand an actual sliver of a chance at freedom and prosperity.

148
hoppy-kangaroos 148 points ago +148 / -0

I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace. -- Thomas Paine

48
KSMOconservative 48 points ago +48 / -0

Love this quote.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
21
kfunny91 21 points ago +21 / -0

that's a great quote

14
NavyGuy 14 points ago +15 / -1

Keep going, I'm almost there.

5
Inquisitor_Corvus 5 points ago +6 / -1

Right there with you

7
BunnyPicnic 7 points ago +7 / -0

But isn't this what got us to where we are now? If we go through tough times, we create strong people, but those strong people will create an easy society again. It's a perpetual process.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
43
mark2398 43 points ago +44 / -1

The problem is that Tree of Liberty takes 40-50 years to grow. In the meantime life is just a bunch of manure being tossed on you. That is why Conservatives are hesitant to take up arms. Your life will be infinitely worse for decades. Normally, I would justify it for the children....but they sorta hate us anyways. A real conundrum.

15
Pepelosi 15 points ago +15 / -0

Totally. Sacrifice ourselves for people that hate us. Ugh.

29
Sheprecon31 29 points ago +29 / -0

A great society plants trees in which shade they will never sit

14
Pepelosi 14 points ago +14 / -0

But what happens when that tree is growing through your asshole?

4
Legionnaire0311 4 points ago +4 / -0

lmao

4
SuperWhig 4 points ago +5 / -1

Poop it back out?

3
SaltyKrakenBalls 3 points ago +3 / -0

This question needs to be asked to one of the liberal justices...

15
Leucophylla12 15 points ago +15 / -0

Nah- this shit would be over pretty quick I think after these pearl clutches realize they’re not in charge anymore. If part of the strike involves taking out twitter, jewgle and fagbook their entire support system would crumble

10
Truinondupressure 10 points ago +10 / -0

Communication networks will be among the first targets. Along with power plants.

6
Pepeflavorednoodles 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you shut down the power plants you will do years worth of damage. Now you can say that damage is worth it, but what you shouldn’t do is underestimate just how much even a week of no power fucks an economy. And how a civil war overall fucks a lot more than that. Anybody who goes into this thinking it’ll be done in a week are the ones the actual conflict will chew up quickly. Bare minimum half a year and I wouldn’t put money on anything less then triple that.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Inquisitor_Corvus 1 point ago +2 / -1

Power lines are the key to retain the underlying infrastructure. Soft targets first. Hard targets only if vital.

1
TheEnclave89 1 point ago +1 / -0

The corrupt assholes are already wanting a new "cyber pandemic", where a massive cyber attack occurs, giving the world government the opening to track everything we do.

7
Zepp87 7 points ago +8 / -1

Jewgle lol. I like that

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
googurt 0 points ago +2 / -2

Had to throw the antisemitism in there.

-5
brotatofarmer -5 points ago +2 / -7

Yeah it will be over pretty quick. Just like all the republicucks who went to dc, got worked up, then just left. And nkw they all get to rot in prison.

21
publius1788 21 points ago +21 / -0

I fear civil war, because I guarantee if it happened the UN would get involved as "peacekeepers" but would actively take the side of the commies. We would be fighting Chinese soldiers.

12
Firespawn 12 points ago +12 / -0

There won't be another civil war, it will be much, much worse. This time it will be a complete clusterfuck basically pitting every man for himself... And then the outsiders as you have mentioned. Unimaginable hell on earth.

11
0369Grunt 11 points ago +12 / -1

The UN "peacekeepers" would get shit stomped by the gangs in places like Chicago, LA, NYC, etc.

Blue helmets make nice targets... just sayin'!

6
publius1788 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a feeling the rules of engagement would be a lot less strict than past UN missions, trained militaries would destroy jogger street gangs in seconds.

4
0369Grunt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Russia's trained military didn't do so well against street gangs in the first Battle of Grozny. The Chechens ate their ass in short order, resulting in the 2nd Battle of Grozny - the Russians won that one, but it basically required them to destroy Grozny in the process. That won't work here on American soil where we have the advantage against foreign forces.

4
publius1788 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who says the street gangs would even be on our sides. The communists would recruit them as their foot soldiers, Empty out all the prisons.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
7
PKShadilay 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just gotta find the frequency of their "suicide helmets" and watch them all got POP!

3
Ricky_CIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blue helmets make excellent aiming points.

3
Sheprecon31 3 points ago +3 / -0

The wolf Cares little about the feelings of the sheep but nobody told the sheep they out number the wolves

16
COLDWARPATRIOT55 16 points ago +16 / -0

Refresh the tree

5
GabeC1997 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be honest, I'm more worried about what our enemies will be doing while this is all going down.

57
MAGA1775 57 points ago +59 / -2

Why are people surprised? I've been trying to tell people for the PAST YEAR that there was an OPEN soft coup performed and SCOTUS was complicit, along with most of the GOP, the military, the DOJ, etc.

I don't understand how anyone is still holding onto faith in our government to save us

Don't expect to be able to just vote our way out of this either. The system is ENTIRELY compromised and they are 100% against us.

22
ForsakenForeskin 22 points ago +22 / -0

Correct and we’re to comfortable (myself included) so we don’t go on offense, which we’re justified to go on offense at this point. Our greatest strength being our value in individual freedom seems to be our greatest downfall, we only do something once we’re affected personally but don’t stick our necks out for each other in my view.

13
MAGA1775 13 points ago +15 / -2

I've seen more infighting and bickering on this place lately rather than unified rallying against the real enemies. But you're right, we're still too comfortable, and people won't care unless it personally affects them.

Conservatives have long had a "leave me alone" mentality, which is why we've never went on the offensive.

This allowed the left/globalists to take over virtually every single institution in America....now they control the entire government, the culture, the media, the courts, the schools, the military....everything.

3
congruent 3 points ago +3 / -0

Part of the problem is the real enemy is well cloaked.

Professional Left/Democrats?

C_A?

FBI?

Deep State?

Chyna?

Gobalist billionares?

Or are all those puppets and we don't see the puppet master?

4
FrontholeEnjoyer 4 points ago +4 / -0

The shriners

2
business_narwhall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anybody who takes even the slightest personal risk on the right is immediately and completely thrown under the bus.

1
johnrambo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been saying this myself

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
18
Diana 18 points ago +18 / -0

I foresee more people dropping out of the workforce as witnessed by this morning's labor participation data.

5
Donglord 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hope so. If this falls through, I hope mass hunger comes soon

12
MasklessMarvel 12 points ago +12 / -0

SCOTUS renders opinions in May and June

15
Cyer6 15 points ago +15 / -0

They fast-tracked this case and the legal "experts" are predicting a quick turnaround.

9
saltyviewer123 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ok so we have time to stock up on copper and lead.

8
UpTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

Are they going to put a stay on the order in the meantime?

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
18
TeeBP 18 points ago +18 / -0

Can't wait for them to declare the arguments moot because the mandate already happened!

9
NullifyAndSecede 9 points ago +9 / -0

If no one can appeal to justice except to government, justice will be perverted in favor of the government, constitutions and supreme courts notwithstanding. Constitutions and supreme courts are state constitutions and agencies, and whatever limitations to state action they might contain or find is invariably decided by agents of the very institution under consideration

— Hans-Hermann Hoppe

162
TrumpWonByALandslide 162 points ago +162 / -0

The founders are spinning in their graves.

78
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 78 points ago +78 / -0

Audio cuts out when commie sotomayor first talks and then again when her question is answered....thats not suspicious at all.

When audio finally comes back in it proves her bias against free people and body autonomy. She says something along the lines that the body is a machine so Osha has the right to dictate how to protect workers against that virus spewing machine.

She neglects the fact that people vaccinated can get, transmit and die of Covid. She neglects the fact that the vaccine is experimental and there is no accountability for damages or harm caused by the vaccine.

She has an obvious bias against humanity and only views us only as vial virus spewing meat machine and we should all surrender our freedoms to dictators. This bitch needs removed...

We do NOT want safety at the cost of liberty! Without freedom, you can kiss your health and everything else goodbye. It is NOT the governments job to keep every individual safe. With freedom comes personal choice and responsibility. It is up to the individual to decide what is best for them, not the government!

A quote attributed to Jefferson summarizes it up nicely;

I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."

71
nomoreprinkles 71 points ago +71 / -0

I have no interest in living or serving in a country where my value is the same as a John Deere tractor.

62
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 62 points ago +62 / -0

Less than a John Deere Tractor. That Tractor isn't a meat sac spewing venomous toxins with every gaping breath. Your existence disgusts them, Tractors do not.

14
BerettaStroker 14 points ago +14 / -0

Meat sac, lol.

2
PKShadilay 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meat suit also works.

2
TheInky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meat Popsicle

1
WhitePowerRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ladies? 😏

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +5 / -2

Less than a John Deer Tractor.

or a John Deere tractor

5
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fixed. Thanks for bringing attention to the misspelling.

1
PresElectKekPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

MUh carbon dioxide

1
alfredbester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, they hate tractors too. Evil machines sucking non renewable energy from Mother Gaia's oily tits.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
10
IroWide 10 points ago +10 / -0

Bingo! Take away the "made in the Image of God/all men are created equal" clauses, and your worth is open to interpretation. Any Christian who knows their bible has seen this coming for decades.

4
BlowfishandFunk 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

John Adams

5
KSMOconservative 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Silence machine! It's time for your.... infusion."

4
H8speech 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s less. At least the ones I have to buy.

16
PraiseBeToScience 16 points ago +19 / -3

She's a woman of course her opinions are shit.

15
KSMOconservative 15 points ago +16 / -1

It's an interesting fact that in both chess and poker, all of the best competitors are men. No physical strength is required. A touch of stamina. Yet, being a woman is a cognitive handicap. It's simply a fact.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
KSMOconservative 5 points ago +5 / -0

Very good point. And who knows what else? Shame that our public institutions are forbidden from scientifically researching and understanding these phenomena. Heaven forbid we learn something and allocate resources efficiently.

My wife absolutely kicks my ass when it comes to organizing, cooking, and nurturing our kids. Our strengths, when combined, collectively kick fucking ass.

1
Julia_J 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a male SCOTUS said the same thing, would you say male opinions are shit? Are MTG's opinions "shit"?

14
MasklessMarvel 14 points ago +14 / -0

the medical data has nothing to do with this

the question is if Biden has the authority to order OSHA to impose the mandate

8
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 8 points ago +8 / -0

I agree with you. She was bringing medical data in to support her bias though. I was hoping someone would call her on it. They are all scared of the media portraying them as against vaccines.

4
Rakkasan91b 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm no fan of Sotomayer and think she is an idiot and not qualified for a seat on the court, but you couldn't hear her audio because she is remote and not physically present in the court.

7
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks for giving a reasonable explanation. The person she was talking to though also cut out once he started to answer. I've experienced the catastrophe of zoom callmeeting though so I understand the real possibility of technical difficulties posed by this style of meeting. I'll go with your answer instead if intentional mic cuts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
39
UpTrump 39 points ago +39 / -0

Scotus is about to cuck on the most important case brought before them this century. They will allow osha to force an experimental injection into our bodies for control

9
Suckitreddit 9 points ago +9 / -0

When Roberts ties himself in nonsensical knots to enforce that citizens buy medical insurance or get a fine...never before had SCOTYS crossed that line...you must buy a product from a private company.

It’s not much more to say ...you must inject something from a private company to “protect” other workers.

I couldn’t take listening anymore, but I did not get the sense that anyone there had listened to a bit of Dr Malone or his brothers in arms about the fallacies in thinking that Pfizer shot=protection from covid. This is just incorrect. Pretty important premise, no?

You are forcing an unapproved medical intervention that doesn’t stop positive “Tests” nor illness, and carries with it a risk that has been significantly underreported. And the citizen has no legal avenue to sue for damages.

9
H8speech 9 points ago +9 / -0

Even if they allow the mandate, I think it requires a legit President. I will not abide by some demented old man who’s commie buddies stole an election for him. Sorry, but fuck off Brandon.

5
DonJr2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doing it at this point in time is so beyond meaningless too.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Look at the daily new cases, triple any previous range. There is not the slightest doubt in the world that the vaccines do not stop transmission. If they even are of some slight personal benefit (which I do not believe but admit is not proven either way) it is of no significance to anyone but the individual.

-8
MasklessMarvel -8 points ago +4 / -12

Scotus is about to cuck on the most important case brought before them this century.

how do you know what their decision will be four months before it is rendered?

can I have the winning lottery numbers?

8
Libertas_Vel_Mors 8 points ago +8 / -0

It'll likely take less than two weeks...

5
Legionnaire0311 5 points ago +6 / -1

Pattern recognition? Past behavior?

Do you have an inner monologue?

19
Joeybronzoni 19 points ago +19 / -0

Lawyers watching and going along with the lawyer's "arguments" as if this is a legit case. The root of the discussion is soiled! I can't take seeing how we are hear. The mountain of lies that are being told are dreadful. Just so everyone is clear on this: 1)There is NO life threatening virus that is going around and 2) there are no "vaccines that prevent the virus they claim is killing literally 600 million people. That's the number one shit bag claimed. This is INSANE.

24
TrumpWonByALandslide 24 points ago +24 / -0

I can't believe we're even arguing COVID or vaccine statistics in this case. That's how you know the country is already lost.

It doesn't matter how dangerous COVID is. It doesn't matter how effective the vaccine is. The federal government, and especially the executive branch, DOES NOT have the constitutional authority to enact such a mandate on practically all U.S. businesses.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
18
Formerlurker92 18 points ago +20 / -2

We ran out of oil years ago and that's all that's been powering the country. Gotta keep those boys spinning faster and faster

12
AnacronicA 12 points ago +12 / -0

Seems Revolution is just a matter of time...

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

Maybe we should hire some hamsters?

7
Done_With_This_Shit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Give my 4 year old a shot of espresso and he can power a small city for a few hours.

5
KSMOconservative 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is an extreme measure. We have to be absolutely certain. Once Hamsters are loosed...there is no calling them back.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, come on.......just once........release the hamsters. We'll be good.

3
TheTelltaleFly 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably need the War kind of hamsters. Know any of those?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been told that hamsters are very peaceful creatures.

Until..............

4
AlphaNathan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have we checked the middle east?

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

they drank enough to power the country

1
KSMOconservative 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they have left their soil to find a more freedom-friendly country. Maybe China.

117
TurkTheRed 117 points ago +117 / -0

Justice Thomas seems to be the only one think logically and with reason

49
Filo76 49 points ago +49 / -0

In other words, the only one not compromised in some way.

34
cajun_robear 34 points ago +34 / -0

Probably the ONLY one who didn't take a trip on the Lolita Express or in some way traffic in children.

19
PraiseBeToScience 19 points ago +19 / -0

Joe Biden tried to destroy him for being an uppity negro, and literally the best they could find was an errant pube.

2
FrontholeEnjoyer 2 points ago +3 / -1

And knowing how black people's hair is it probably wasn't even

-30
deleted -30 points ago +1 / -31
9
doug2 9 points ago +9 / -0

There's not? How about blackmail?

6
behemoth887 6 points ago +6 / -0

or how bout literally killing one and saying "that will be you...unless" to the other ones

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not like Roberts was on Epstein's flight logs...

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
johnparker 3 points ago +3 / -0

So when can you challenge an election? Not before, not during, and not after? So when?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
yurimodin 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS has been wrong before and they will be wrong again.

6
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 6 points ago +6 / -0

As usual

98
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 98 points ago +98 / -0

They really, REALLY don't get what this whole thing is about.

And their knowledge of the numbers and the situation is completely false. Not that it's even relevant.

61
deleted 61 points ago +61 / -0
18
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 18 points ago +18 / -0

Even the "Conservative" ones.

I've tuned out before getting a chance to hear Thomas. Hopefully there will be some good clips of it later.

8
spelunking_librator 8 points ago +8 / -0

weird how all those mansions exist out of this reality and are unreachable by regular people

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
8
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't worry, they already covered the fact that the courts aren't supposed to decide the legality of something based in biology or medicine. Apparently that goes to political, biased, elected federal agencies that the people choose.

Failing the point that this has nothing to do with virology or pharmaceutical science and everything to do with the constitution and personal liberty.

You know, just the very thing that they're appointed to rule on.

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +6 / -1

none of that is relevant

this is a question about Biden's authority

5
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. The fact that the conversation barely touched on that is troubling.

But given SCOTUS's past rulings, I'm not surprised.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sotomayor is the one trying to deflect

shock

71
MythArcana 71 points ago +71 / -0

It's in the bag already, just going thru the motions at this point.

69
Joaniev9 69 points ago +70 / -1

This country may need the reset.

13
MasklessMarvel 13 points ago +13 / -0

ctrl-alt-defeat

6
MAGA1775 6 points ago +8 / -2

"May need?"

I think its clear that it does need it.

The corruption is so deep and vast that there's no easy fix for this

3
Data 3 points ago +3 / -0

It makes me sad that you aren't absolutely certain. It's been plainly obvious for a long time now.

64
Lars_Lindemann 64 points ago +64 / -0

This is a fucking circus. I can't believe what I'm listening to.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
55
blubberdong 55 points ago +60 / -5

I assume we're gonna take action this time...right? Right? Guys?

22
Prudentwait 22 points ago +25 / -3

There is no "we" without leadership. What institution is fighting for us? What leader with real power is standing up in any meaningful way? No war, real or metaphorical, is fought by individuals.

11
TeamOrangeFB 11 points ago +11 / -0

Agreed. I thought Trump was going to be our George Washington, but he balked on Jan 6th for reasons unknown. If he gave the word to destroy those traitors in DC, it would have been done.

8
RuleoVicus 8 points ago +8 / -0

The military brass was readied to massacre the Patriots at the Capitol if so ordered.

They were not going to be following anything Trump ordered however.

2
realPhantomFuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, anyone O-6 or higher is compromised

1
TheEnclave89 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I've heard, captains and higher are politicians.

I really don't like how our military's officers are selected by referrals over ability and merit, it's gross.

1
realPhantomFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

O-6 and above are confirmed by Congress... So ya can see how that works

-3
MasklessMarvel -3 points ago +1 / -4

So suppose Trump did want to destroy the country and made a call to arms

what happens next?

5
LettertotheSpezitor 5 points ago +5 / -0

Something other than this. The idea of the system collapsing and war and starvation is not as terrifying as losing all freedoms. One of those situations can eventually be fixed

2
TeamOrangeFB 2 points ago +2 / -0

We will never know. But at least those corrupt congressmen would be dead.

1
ekos640 1 point ago +12 / -11

There is no "we" without leadership. What institution is fighting for us? What leader with real power is standing up in any meaningful way? No war, real or metaphorical, is fought by individuals.

No one is fighting for me so I'm not gonna fight for myself

that's literally what you just said

lmao you mushy pussy you, you personally and specifically deserve everything you get

11
notCIA 11 points ago +13 / -2

There is no one man army. That's what you refuse to address. Every single person is waiting for an individual to act because everyone is afraid if they organize daddy gubmint will infiltrate them.

-1
ekos640 -1 points ago +8 / -9

Timothy McVeigh was one man

Guy Faux was one man

Tiananmen Square Man was one man

but yeah, you're all alone

so stay complacent, that will change things

5
notCIA 5 points ago +6 / -1

You can't actually be serious. Do you have any other revolutionaries who flat out failed at their individual attempt to make change you would like to cite?

-4
ekos640 -4 points ago +3 / -7

you know who they all were

but they all were just one man

one man alone can have no impact you said ,so how the hell do you even know who these people are?

Unless all alone is an excuse for cowardice and compliance

Comply like a good sheep

5
notCIA 5 points ago +6 / -1

Ok, is the end result having a wikipedia page with your name on it or winning a war? Don't confuse the two.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Guy Faux was one man

for real?

::laugh track::

Fawkes

1
ekos640 1 point ago +3 / -2

Autocorrect, or are you just gonna latch onto that as the only thing you got?

0
thetenman 0 points ago +1 / -1

All of your examples failed to change anything.

1
ekos640 1 point ago +2 / -1

yet you know who they are, so they made an impact nonetheless for people through time to know who they were............. interesting 🤔

your next excuse for cowardice?

-2
MasklessMarvel -2 points ago +2 / -4

Every single person is waiting for an individual Trump to act because they are cowards who cannot think for themselves

5
notCIA 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, they would be fine with just about anybody. I'd be careful calling the inactive cowards, I haven't seen hide nor hair of anything you've done.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

well, then, come on up here

wear your MAGA hat but beware, everyone is going to want to stop and talk to you about how much they like Trump

if you really want to make friends say "Let's go Brandon" anywhere there are people

no one will laugh at you if you wear a mask but you are going to stand out like a sore thumb

if you steal something, you'll go to jail

if you go to jail, you will have to post bail to get out

you can walk down the street at midnight and be as safe as you were at your momma's titty

we don't have BLM burning buildings- or BLM at all- or antifags in their bathrobes, and they are probably wise to stay away

we have school choice, constitutional carry and the senator who nuked the whole commie agenda singlehandedly

as far as I can see there is nothing left to be done

now you

1
notCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same as where I live. Are you arguing that nothing needs done or that everyone is waiting on Trump? Can't be both. You go ahead and take that luxurious life for granted and believe it doesn't require protecting.

-3
Prudentwait -3 points ago +1 / -4

You're dealing with the same shit I and everyone else is.

3
ekos640 3 points ago +4 / -1

And you're the only one telling people to do nothing cause they're all alone

I suggest the opposite

0
Prudentwait 0 points ago +2 / -2

You're suggesting people commit suicide for the advancement of no tangible goal.

4
PKShadilay 4 points ago +4 / -0

Translation: just stand by and do nothing as they implement the "beast system" from the Bible.

0
Prudentwait 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, one person can't do much at this point.

2
ekos640 2 points ago +3 / -1

it's only suicide if you don't take anyone with you? hitting someone in the face with a punch - is a goal

1
13FOX 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does that make it right?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Joaniev9 11 points ago +12 / -1

I believe when ppl start going hungry, it'll pop off...

4
blubberdong 4 points ago +4 / -0

And while the SC debates this important issue the well-fed, untested and unvaccinated migrants flow freely across the southern border.

3
Joaniev9 3 points ago +3 / -0

Replacement workforce

3
247MAGA 3 points ago +5 / -2

no, the cowards are capitulating to the tyrants.

0
FuckNWO 0 points ago +1 / -1

yea when we’re too weak to win

8
H00nter 8 points ago +10 / -2

Just two more weeks.

6
spelunking_librator 6 points ago +6 / -0

let's wait for a sign

6
NavySTG 6 points ago +6 / -0

TrUsT tHe PlAn!!!!

6
ekos640 6 points ago +6 / -0

muh isotope watermarks

2
Fridge_pirate 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hopefully that sign has some good optics. Wouldn't want to look bad.

2
NavySTG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Already have. The angry Pepe meme was deployed. 🤣

46
Loc12 46 points ago +47 / -1

The justices are literally just repeating what they heard on CNN

22
plaaaa 22 points ago +22 / -0

Or rather "the globalist script".

9
MAGA1775 9 points ago +11 / -2

It doesn't come from CNN, its the universal "globalist narrative."

CNN just repeats what their masters tell them, along with SCOTUS and everyone else part of the regime.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
40
Dylan_da_Spider 40 points ago +40 / -0

I was gonna watch it later, is it really going that badly? What's being said?

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +27 / -4
62
TenFeetHigher 62 points ago +62 / -0

Don't worry? How can I not worry with ACB, Kavanaugh, and Roberts with their terrible track records?

11
deleted 11 points ago +15 / -4
36
CommunismIsForLosers 36 points ago +36 / -0

Watch, they'll rule that as long as people are charged $1 before being forced to get the vaxx, it's all good because it's just another tax. Because remember THAT betrayal?

7
jimboonie 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's the problem with banking on precedents, though. It's easy enough to set a new precedent.

4
notCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

All that tells me is they are free to cuck even harder. Hope I'm wrong.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

the reason SCOTUS hears cases is because there is no clear precedent

-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +1 / -2

what are their track records?

3
TenFeetHigher 3 points ago +3 / -0

Roberts with ACA.

Kavanaugh and ACB with their "MOOOOOTT!!! and "no standing" BS when it came time to even HEAR election cases.

15
Pinochet_Was_Right 15 points ago +15 / -0

That one shithead or they all echoing the same?

We are not exactly level-headed here I've noticed

2
deleted 2 points ago +6 / -4
-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +2 / -3

that's every post

1
freeamerica4ever 1 point ago +2 / -1

Quick summary, anyone? I'm getting heavy blackpill vibe and can't watch right now.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
ThunderInYourHeart 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did Kav and ACB say specificity that was cucked?

3
Cyer6 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't watch. Go eat a good lunch, get in a workout and find something fun to do.

3
freeamerica4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I predict I'll be doing a lot of anger workouts this week.

1
semsem 1 point ago +1 / -0

More often than not, verbal arguments before SCOTUS are mostly just posturing for however the justices have each already decided to think and vote based upon the written filings. Every once in a while it matters in terms of affecting their thinking and votes, but it's mostly like when a difficult girlfriend starts listing shit you've done wrong- she's already decided where this is going.

The job of any attorney presenting oral arguments is more or less just to not screw up, and if one of the justices wants a particular quote or argument from them, they'll more or less prompt them to spoonfeed it back to them so they can cite it in their ruling or dissent.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

no one can possibly determine anything at this point

this is SCOTUS, not Wapner

1
The_Knight_of_sunset 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. This is looking like the time when Trump cancelled his Jan 6 press conference and everyone lost their minds.

Going to probably log off the internet until tonight, when the dust clears.

22
Chopblock 22 points ago +22 / -0

Imagine a thanksgiving dinner with your self-important, out-of-touch, and totally misinformed libtarded grandparents.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
spelunking_librator 2 points ago +3 / -1

oh shit, spin up the choppers guys

21
PKShadilay 21 points ago +21 / -0

Nearly everyone is regurgitating CNN talking points about how deadly Covid is and how wonderful the vax is.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

so far nothing that has any bearing on this case

37
Robigus 37 points ago +37 / -0

I don't get how in the hell they see this as constitutional. Are they fucking stupid? Rhetorical question. The federal government tells me if I can work or take an experimental shot? Those are my choices? That's not how we were founded.

13
ANatisGrey 13 points ago +13 / -0

Kagan literally said she doesn't understand how health and safety could possibly violate the constitution. 🤯

9
NavySTG 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's a stepping stone towards a full gun ban, for "health and safety". That's why draconian gun ban legislation is plased under health and safety at the state level (Colorado's mag ban and background check laws, for example). At a state level, these laws can't even be overturned by voting. It's a sham.

37
LoobintheToobin 37 points ago +37 / -0

Jeremiah 8:12 (ESV) Were they ashamed when they committed abomination? No, they were not at all ashamed; they did not know how to blush. Therefore they shall fall among the fallen; when I punish them, they shall be overthrown, says the LORD.

-3
MasklessMarvel -3 points ago +1 / -4

they did not know how to blush.

their mascara was crooked and there was lipstick on their teeth

2
LoobintheToobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those vax induced seizures, stokes and face melting palsy built in bonus effects sure make makeup application extra challenging. Plus when you’ve lost what remains of your marbles to graphene clots how could one be expected to know how to blush.

Dark humor aside, Let us be careful to watch at a distance with terror, respect and awe. But for the Grace of God there go I.

“Don’t rejoice when your enemies fall; don’t be happy when they stumble. For the Lord will be displeased with you and will turn his anger away from them.” ‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭24:17-18‬ ‭NLT‬‬

Ezekiel 14:22 (NLT) Yet there will be survivors, and they will come here to join you as exiles in Babylon. You will see with your own eyes how wicked they are, and then you will feel better about what I have done to Jerusalem.

Ezekiel 14:23 (NLT) When you meet them and see their behavior, you will understand that these things are not being done to Israel without cause. I, the Sovereign LORD, have spoken!”

32
LampshadeDisco 32 points ago +32 / -0

This isn't going well, imo.

8
stealthboy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Did you honestly think it would go well? The current state of all three branches of government is a total disaster.

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
Formerleftist 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hate to say it but that's literally the only way throughout all of human history where corruption was stomped out.

7
TheTerroracist 7 points ago +7 / -0

There will be a Boston massacre type of event.

2
DMFT 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a leader.

2
BlowfishandFunk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who is our George Washington?

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
19
phramos1213 19 points ago +19 / -0

2nd amendment people I've been waiting for years

5
Cheesemaker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe OSHA can mandate no gun ownership because someone shot up people at work one time! It's a safety issue!

This whole thing is a circus...

3
TheEnclave89 3 points ago +3 / -0

Knowing how this is going, OSHA will simply state: "People are machines. Therefore, we must uninstall the illegal weapons from the machines. For the sake of 'safety' ".

4
MobileDev4Trump 4 points ago +6 / -2

Don't worry this is the trail balloon for taking more 2nd amendment rights away.

-3
MasklessMarvel -3 points ago +1 / -4

what do you mean?

1
covok48 1 point ago +2 / -1

Stop asking question in bad faith you Reddit faggot.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

i was not talking to you so shut the fuck up

0
covok48 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don’t care. You shit up every thread you’re in.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

are you an idiot?

don't answer that

i told you to shut the fuck up

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
thehumbleme 19 points ago +19 / -0

So many lies already, and so many areas of false premise.

OSHA develops regulations for work-related hazards that are inherent to the work itself, not a natural hazard. They mentioned fires. Yes, fire hazards vary depending on workplace, which means the regulations will be higher for places where the threat is higher. That is not the same as an illness.

They also mentioned the hepatitis vaccine, lying about how it is regulated. Any employee, even in healthcare, has a right to refuse the vaccine. This does not dismiss you from work, or mean that you cannot work there. You’re essentially waiving the company of liability. That’s it.

People fighting for our side need to stop using their premise. This has nothing to do with the degree of threat. A threat, regardless of degree, does not grant the government any powers not already delegated to it by the constitution.

16
PeruvianNeckTie 16 points ago +16 / -0

Kagan is a dumb bitch.

10
sustainable_saltmine 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sotamayor was Obama's "diversity hire"

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
15
Chopblock 15 points ago +15 / -0

jury box

You hold judgement in the same hand as your rights.

14
TrumpChampBelt 14 points ago +14 / -0

They want Kazakhstan 2.0 in America. And osha is going to cause it

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
AmericaFirstMAGA88 13 points ago +13 / -0

Our only hope is that the free states join together to defend the principles this nation was founded on

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

like letting SCOTUS determine the constitutionality of a law?

12
ImGumbyDammit 12 points ago +12 / -0

Everyone remember....Politicians first.

4
MagaDevildog2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've been of the mindset that it'll have to be a coordinated attack at the same time of "media & Politicians" strategically speaking got to control the communications and prevent them from escaping, in Escape from Tarkov of course.

2
VonBustacap 2 points ago +2 / -0

Add big tech to that list.

1
MagaDevildog2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just add by default big tech to Media/ Communication but yes.

11
Skywise 11 points ago +11 / -0

So Sotomayer supports forced abortions and forced preganancies - cuz we’re just masheens, right?

Just need to declare a health emergency like racism…

10
Boobzrule 10 points ago +10 / -0

If this passes does that destroy the option of religious exemption? .. if so how tf is that constitutional

9
Schroeder09 9 points ago +9 / -0

They're only deciding today if the mandate can go into existence while the court cases are heard. This is only about the stay on the mandate. That being said, if they allow the mandate to go on while the court cases are heard I think that's highly indicative of how they would decide on the mandate itself.

1
Boobzrule 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the mandate disregard the option for religious/medical exemption?

4
Tardigrade 4 points ago +4 / -0

It allows for testing, and I think exemptions but Im not sure.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Tardigrade 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I agree its not a real solution.

1
Boobzrule 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, pede

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

And nobody there was smart enough to ask whether vaccinated can spread the virus.

(Hint: they can, which destroys the logic behind the entire mandate)

We are surrounded by idiots.

10
WinterSoldier82 10 points ago +10 / -0

They want the PureBloods dead...

9
bobfather 9 points ago +9 / -0

80% of my company has already said they will quit on day one, if passed.

9
SleeperAg20 9 points ago +9 / -0

Let's fucking go. Common SCOTUS, do what your masters paid you to do. Just fucking say it..!!!

9
Wearyman 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's why I'm not listening. I can't. My blood pressure won't allow it. I will rely on my fellow pede's with more hardy dispositions than mine to listen on my behalf and take notes.

Thank you, my Frens for enduring this.

8
publius1788 8 points ago +9 / -1

State nullification is still on the table guys, not all is lost.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
TheEnclave89 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not fucked at all. They can't do anything unless you consent. They will try, but resist.

6
hoppy-kangaroos 6 points ago +6 / -0

They're the same people who said the President didn't have standing in his election. Be glad they're not mandating seal clapping when someone says Potato, yet.

-2
MasklessMarvel -2 points ago +1 / -3

They're the same people who said the President didn't have standing in his election.

BZZZZT!

they said TX did not have standing to sue other states over their election results

standing has been a legal principle since the 1600s

4
hoppy-kangaroos 4 points ago +4 / -0

BZZZZZT!!! GEOTUS was a party along with the literal State legislatures. A complete execution of our Republic. SCOTUS went full blown Commie.

2
covok48 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shut up fed.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

die

6
Kerra_Holt 6 points ago +9 / -3

Just vote harder, faggots. Voting and depending on the system will fix EVERYTHING. No need to get violent or fight for your rights. The system works!

2
doug2 2 points ago +5 / -3

Better than not voting at all retard

4
Goldlight 4 points ago +4 / -0

always take a multi pronged approach

2
Kerra_Holt 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about that audit, fagboi?

6
HalfKing 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are backing people into a corner. You know what happens next.....

1
TheEnclave89 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their worst nightmare.

6
Plsdontfireme 6 points ago +6 / -0

With this logic, OSHA should require employers to put all their employees on a weight loss program or submit to weekly physicals in order to solve heart diesease.

6
pburgpait 6 points ago +6 / -0

Who is that bitch arguing in favor?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
pburgpait 9 points ago +9 / -0

Someone get her a ticket for a free chopper ride

2
BoomShtick 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ll throw in gas money for her ride up

1
TheEnclave89 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell, I would pay for her ride out of the generosity of my black heart.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
Truman_Show 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anyone need a healthy dose of testosterone? Because We are fucked.

5
AdeptTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is rage inducing

5
AngelMark 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS will show their true colors and then every gov/legal etc entity has now been exposed as corrupt! Maybe then the fucking sheep will wake up but I doubt it

5
TheTerroracist 5 points ago +5 / -0

War

5
ForsakenForeskin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Still not taking the shots

5
TurkTheRed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Alito for the win, finally some common sense.

5
LibertyFox 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sotomayor is basically arguing the government's case for it.

5
Salty_Dad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Grave danger grave danger grave danger grave danger grave danger grave danger grave danger grave danger blah

5
Pepelosi 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want to fucking shit on everything right now!!!!!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
bigdaddydata 4 points ago +5 / -1

Fuck it. We got the weapons. War they want - war they get.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

MAKE HER QUANTIFY THE RISK!!!!!!!

4
WomenShouldntVote 4 points ago +4 / -0

Qrd?