2190
posted ago by RevenTexX ago by RevenTexX +2194 / -4

So we all love the news about the Judge Ordering Pfizer and the FDA to release vaccine data, which is a big big win. But take this in for a moment, this is proof they're hiding something big.

The FDA Approved the vaccine within 108 days, right? That means they would have to read ALL of the data in just under 4 months.

If they went through all of the data in 108 days then why is the FDA now claiming that they only have the manpower to review 500 pages of data a month, yet the court wants 55 FUCKING THOUSAND PAGES PER MONTH.

That means that there is easily HUNDREDS of thousands of pages, THAT IS PROOF THE FDA NEVER READ THE FUCKING DATA AND APPROVED THE VACCINE WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE IT WORKS.

How do people not fucking see this shit???

Comments (163)
sorted by:
216
Foomer 216 points ago +218 / -2

People are seeing this. People just don't know what to do about it.

79
CrouchingKamalasHant 79 points ago +80 / -1

^^^ This and ¡¡¡¡ that

34
DinosOnNoahsArk 34 points ago +34 / -0

"Uhm, you see, part of being a leader my field of science means I'm smarter than most people, and my ability to read executive reports, rather than the full data, is much greater than you or the average person. So therefore, I don't need to analyze and read all that data. I just need to take my great mind and skim over it."

21
tom_machine 21 points ago +21 / -0

checks stock options... yep, still own Pfizer & Moderna

Approved!

13
BeefChucker 13 points ago +13 / -0

More people died than in the placebo group, they got rid of the control group and did a study with children that resulted in a catastrophic adverse reaction that should have been impossible given how tiny the experimental group was. These shots were NEVER not going to be approved.

6
renata_h 6 points ago +6 / -0

I love the way you communicate.

4
frogface 4 points ago +5 / -1

Who do you shoot first ?

4
Inquisitor_Corvus 4 points ago +5 / -1

All of them? Let God sort out his own?

25
MoreTorbaLessKushner 25 points ago +26 / -1

1776

Start by ending the Fed and Carnigie Endowment.

7
grndmrshlgando 7 points ago +7 / -0

exactly this. everyone is seeing it including me yet they're all acting like nothing is happening while the economy falls apart and nobody wants to work

4
Foomer 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of people will be out of work when they refuse the vaxpass

7
HockeyMom4Trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

I know what not to do…do not take an experimental vaccine!

1
TheOneWhoKnocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are seeing this. People just don't know what to do about it.

Well, while people are contemplating the answer to this question, the collection of brass, lead and dry goods can be a meditative exercise that aids in the thought process.

105
rebelde_sin_causa 105 points ago +105 / -0

they had to approve the jab so they could find out what was in it

49
EvJohn 49 points ago +49 / -0

Very similar to bills these legislators don't ever read.

I did the math about 20 years ago. Not enough time in several years, reading 8 hours a day, to read one year's worth of bills.

We're NOT being represented. Different subject, but same topic.

It's criminal. Captured government.

58
thisguy883 58 points ago +58 / -0

I know a lot of people hate Tim Pool, but he very recently had MTG on his show and she talked about vocal voting.

Basically, only a few people from each side in Congress would have to be present and the speaker, who according to MTG was NOT Pelosi, but some fill-in, would call for a vocal vote to pass a bill. MTG said she saw the Dems yell "Yay" while the Republicans who were there just sorta went, "nay" under their breathes. This led to the Dems winning the vote and what ever bill that was brought up passed.

MTG said she got a rule book and figured out that any member of Congress can call on the speaker to record the vote for any bill trying to go through. What this means is that before the fill-in speaker can call it, she can request that all 400+ members of Congress record their votes or the bill becomes DOA. She told Tim that once she figured that out, she started doing it to every single bill that was brought up through the house and is the reason why both Democrats AND Republicans hate her. They now had to literally stop what they were doing to record their vote and make it available to the public.

God Bless MTG. We need more people like her.

23
EvJohn 23 points ago +23 / -0

Any shred of accountability for the individual is a step in the right direction. God bless MTG for this alone.

7
renata_h 7 points ago +7 / -0

We, The Stupid, have no idea how our government works. I keep reading Constitution in my spare time. And more.....takes time.

5
Iranhasnukes 5 points ago +5 / -0

MTG and Geatz are the only ones in congress that seem to know how to derail this freak show.

And Stew Peters called her a communist. Fucking freak - he does so much good work but when he called MTG a commie and then doubled down the next day, I say to myself, self? They fag is a 10 percenter, meaning he only attracts flies

3
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was listening to Stew for awhile but thought his judgement was really off about certain things so I needed a break.

Regarding MTG — correct me if I’m wrong — as I recall, Stew didn’t have good reasons for trashing her. As I recall, his complaint was basically that she’s all talk. And he might have said or implied that she’s purposely trying to be a distraction. Maybe we’re talking about different timeframes though (different show episodes) because I don’t remember Stew using the word commie to describe her. That just seems obviously false.

4
Harcerz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Watched just the beginning of MTG/Pool conversation, gonna listen to the rest of it.

I was under the impression that they all vote using electronic devices (since 1973) and every vote is being recorded automatically and can be revieved by The People: https://clerk.house.gov/Votes?CongressNum=117&Session=1st

It's true anyone can request that "voice vote" be recorded. Wonder what were they using voice voting for. Thought it's just some unimportant stuff that 100% can agree on like 15 minute break for Nadler's diaper change. I don't want to know who would vote against it!

1
DebfurmNM 1 point ago +1 / -0

Woop woop!

9
NZbacon 9 points ago +9 / -0

You need to get this to alt media.

20
BadManOrange 20 points ago +20 / -0

Putting aside the theories of mass death and depopulation scenarios, the simple idea of needing something to test this mRNA vaccine technology on a grand scale without having to jump through the typical regulatory hoops was too much for these people to pass up. After so many failed tests on animals, they would have never passed the rigors of human trials. Instead, we already see them running to create all sorts of new mRNA based vaccines for all kinds of stuff after the "success" of the COVID vaxes.

10
DonJr2024 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trials are done by companies that get paid by the drug companies. Do you think they would ever really report the truth? You could probably get pure heroin approved for kids if you wanted.

4
BeefChucker 4 points ago +4 / -0

“99.9% effectacious at pain management” -dr tony fauci after being given a $2 million bribe by a mexican heroin cartel

1
Moose_Antlers 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a bit more complex than that. We live in a litigious society. The last thing you want on your hands is another Vioxx where your study misses the rare, but serious adverse effect, people end up dying of heart attacks, and you get the drug yanked off the market after you're all in on production and can't make a penny back, while simultaneously you're swatting lawsuits and settling for even more cash. That's the risk with every new drug that hits the market.

So, they can't lie too much because the lawyers would eat them alive.

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but they just disclose all the "rare" side effects in a rapid-fire stream of words at the end of the commercial. So yeah the trials will make some mention of the adverse events, but they still downplay it massively and conclude that overall nearly everything is "safe and effective".

Might give you a heart attack and might not work but it helped 5 others so you are just unlucky. Basically it's your fault.

8
FutureVRPilot 8 points ago +8 / -0

Really,. At my work I told the guys not to take it but of course it was forced and one of my friends 5 days after the JJ he's got 50 to 80% rashes on his body and he had to go to Kaiser three times ,🤔 bup to 100,000 dead in over a million injured yep these are really worth the risk when I've survived multiple flus,. VAERS under reports a factor of 10 I'm giving it

1
IPMang 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was mainly to gain power for the left, get control of police and military through forced vaccines (people quit/fired are replaced with sheep leftists), and change the laws so they don't have to do this again.

8
suckmycorona 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s the libtard way

5
CommunismIsForLosers 5 points ago +5 / -0

(Authorization isn't the same as approval)

4
BostonVoter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is the jab approved?

4
BeefChucker 4 points ago +6 / -2

The jab is fda approved, but they can’t give it to anyone because then they would be liable for the damage it causes. So they give everyone the eua one. The fda approved one is vapor ware

-1
BostonVoter -1 points ago +2 / -3

Stop Lying... it's not fda approved. You talk in blanket statements.... " the jab is"

You are embellishing

1
1
BostonVoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are a fucking Scumbag Troll.

The worst kind of Troll. Rotten fucking scumbag

You are indeed the Biggest Fucking Moron on this site.

I hope your children get Cancer and die

-2
BostonVoter -2 points ago +1 / -3

Your wording is very strange. You are a troll.

60
Yignuced 60 points ago +61 / -1

They do see it. They don’t care. Pretty insane.

34
RevenTexX [S] 34 points ago +34 / -0

Yep, you're right.

It sickens me that we have these creatures roaming the Earth, politically retarded leftists siding with big pharma and big tech over freedom.

11
Gadsden 11 points ago +11 / -0

Against their own best interests.

Boggles my mind.

7
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +7 / -0

They called them useful idiots for a reason.

38
sawdust 38 points ago +38 / -0

All of this is assuming that they actually have any data at all. What if they just told the court that there are X hundreds of thousands of pages (because they know that is how many they would have had if they actually had done the research), but the data doesn't really exist and would have to be created to produce it to the court which is what they likely do not have the manpower for. At least to do it discretely without getting caught. That is my bet.

11
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 11 points ago +11 / -0

Maybe all those pages are like the inserts that come with the jabs: blank.

7
brundlefly777 7 points ago +7 / -0

[This page left blank intentionally.]

3
BeefChucker 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s probably a word a page. “Page 1 approve” “page 2 this” “Page 3 pfizer” “page 4 give” “page 5 millions”

1
Original_Dankster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Justin Trudeau did that for the latest gun control rules. He provided during the campaign that all policy would be "evidence based".

So the gun rights orgs filed for the Canadian equivalent of FOIA, known as the Access to Information Act.

The gov't refused disclosure saying that the info was super secret public safety stuff. Then the judges compelled them, now they're only releasing a fraction of the so called "evidence" to support gun bans, and most of it is redacted.

Inside tip: three never was any data or evidence at all.

23
USAisgone 23 points ago +23 / -0

The government never reads anything it tries to implement, they just push whatever their told to push. Then after it passes then it's time to read closely to see what powers they can usurp and ways they can extract money

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
icuNurse 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is exactly what happens.

A majority of the data that is in that vaccine submission is likely medical record style information on each individual who participated in the trial. These companies submit a report on the cumulative data, then submit that report as well as the complete data set when they apply for approval.

So essentially Pfizer submitted 300k documents with a summary and data compilation of 150 pages. The FDA only looks at the data compilation and goes based on that.

The FDA didn't actually look at shit and that's why they're caught with their pants down.

20
JiggsawCalrissian 20 points ago +20 / -0

By jove I think you're right

23
RevenTexX [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

Everyone involved needs to be charged with crimes against humanity.

3
easyonthefiber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that the elite's version of the drinking game "Cards Against Humanity" ?

3
ChristPrevaileth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Underrated comment. Upvoted

3
grndmrshlgando 3 points ago +3 / -0

prosecute the bad guys I agree but I'm afraid the damage has been done

17
_Sully_ 17 points ago +17 / -0

You do realize that the FDA doesn't actually look at that stuff, right? They contract out everything. They don't even assess the information themselves. So when the FDA says they approved something, it really is just some paper pushers saying so without regard or knowledge of what it is. There isn't an agency making decisions.

6
RevenTexX [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm pretty sure everybody knows this, the FDA aren't doctors. Doctors are the ones that peer review data for things like vaccines.

The FDA claims they have the man power to deliver 500 pages a month.

6
schiff_for_brains 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was the FDA offering 1 employee for 1 day a month, printing out 500 pages and then scanning them into Acrobat to create a new deliverable product.

13
TheOne1 13 points ago +13 / -0

You can't see shit when you deliberately look the other way or bury your head in the sand...

10
Lurking-My-Life-Away 10 points ago +10 / -0

Look, I have a lot of love for Donald Trump but this vaccine and Operation Warpspeed was a massive fuckup. The only good thing to come from it is that the dimwit democrats embraced the fuck out of it.

-2
FutureVRPilot -2 points ago +3 / -5

It gave us a option out you know 5 to 10 years without a vaccine would have been devastating on the world as far as these globalists would have enjoyed it so the best way to counteract it was for better for worse Trump gave us an option and that saved a few million people from dying in this

4
loveshock 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're still under the delusion that the vaccine has useful benefits.

It's a bioweapon used for depopulation.

1
Lurking-My-Life-Away 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will concede your point. The question is has it been worth it?

1
magaprincess 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well, it's a new way to look at the old "Problem, Reaction, Solution" adage.

Problem - lockdowns for 5 years due to no vaccine Reaction - FFWD Vax Solution - A let the cards land where they may situation :

Highly vaxxed public still getting sick and/or dying, people seeing through the facade that wouldnt have previously, people power increasing. He provided a vaccine, they said it would be poison. When their side's in, they flipped flopped and said it was the best thing ever, Trumpers are the stupid unvaxxed. Trumper's are bad.

It exposes the facade.

The flip side is that they're still continuing on with the make believe that there's so many dangerous new variants and muh boosters.

Though they can't as easily get away with lockdowns anymore. They've adapted.

Is it worth it that more people see the reality of the situation, the evilness of man?

That will depend on what people choose to do with it. Posting frog memes doesn't do jack shit. Actual action is all that will count.

10
JuliusEvola 10 points ago +10 / -0

Same story with every 2,000 page bill written by lobbyists that congress signs 1-2 days later.

No one reads these documents except special interests & a handful of honest journalists that get censored.

7
MrMcGreenGenes 7 points ago +7 / -0

They read the Cliffs Notes version.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
7
Powhattan 7 points ago +7 / -0

No need to read it when communism is your goal.

7
WZRD 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can confirm, I am working on a paper where I explain these events in my introduction: https://imgur.com/a/JgMSyVc

1
innominata 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks good, and I'm keen to read the rest, but that page doesn't address OP's main concern that the FDA could not physically have done due dilligence due to time and labour constraints.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
20KAG20 6 points ago +6 / -0

You don’t need to read 55k+ Documents to know what’s going on. Pfizer knows what the drug is doing. They get the real data. They hide that data in hundreds of thousands of pages so people can’t find it easily. I’m sure the top people at Pfizer have the exact information we want that could be read in an afternoon, they just aren’t going to share that.

5
Xeil 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see far more then most.. it’s convincing you fuck wits how bad things really are to actually do something other then just complaining about it.

https://patriots.win/p/140voQf6aA/a-new-era-5min-read/

2
innominata 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hey us fuckwits have a mountain of memes to view, we can't do everything else as well

1
Xeil 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish that was your only burden.

5
Gnometard 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, NOBODY seems concerned that these shots DELIVER INSTRUCTIONS TO YOUR CELLS TO PRODUCE THE SPIKE PROTEIN! That's how they all work!

NOTHING about that sounds like a good idea, I really think everyone is ignoring that

4
Steven4385 4 points ago +4 / -0

No doubt they've read all of it. They don't want US to read it.

4
TwelveMoreYears 4 points ago +4 / -0

They don't put it on TV

4
HippieNinja17 4 points ago +4 / -0

very true

4
MrSir 4 points ago +4 / -0

"They wouldnt do that"

-my dad, my brother, my grandma, my dem uncles and aunts, my retarded cousins.

I am a hoot at family gatherings.

3
Formerlurker92 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not rocket science: they are bad people who touch kids.

3
CmonPeopleGetReal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Common Core has destroyed math and CRITICAL THINKING

1
NooneFor2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS!

CRT will make it worse

3
OnlyRetardsGetTheJab 3 points ago +3 / -0

The FDA never approved the Pfizer death jab (BioNTech).
They approved Comirnaty which isn't even available in the U.S.

The Pfizer death jab has emergency use authorization only.
It's an experimental injection using experimental technology and anyone who gets it is a guinea pig in the experiment.

Also, honestly... anyone who would get injected with this shit is right down there with the Tide Pod eaters, so they kinda deserve the injuries and death they'll receive.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
kybric 3 points ago +3 / -0

The same logic (but backwards) can be applied to voting. It takes 1 day for 100,000,000s of people to show up and cast votes by hand, and always has. Therefore, these very same votes can be counted by hand in 1 day as well. Counting votes is a whole lot faster than counting votes, which requires driving to the polls, waiting in line, ect. There is no legitimate reason to use electronic vote tabulators, with black box algorithms and software, and spending billions of dollars to build these machines. No legitimate reason at all, and they completely corrupt our "democratic elections" to the core

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
BostonVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is what I am saying .. stop suggesting bioNTech has fda approval....

Some other non manufactured thing nobody heard of is approved ( suspicious as fuck)

2
FutureVRPilot 2 points ago +2 / -0

COMIRNATY.

2
TruthMemeCanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get the ropes ready

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget: this includes doing the clinical trial and compiling the data before giving it to the FDA... Bill Gates had the message code for the spike protein before Jan 2020 to produce the vax that fast. Or else this is impossible.

2
Hippopoonis 2 points ago +2 / -0

It also proves Pfizer has been working on this "vaccine" for years.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, they read it. They just simply had each of their 595,247 employees read a different paragraph out loud at the same time. This is how libtards communicate.

2
PaineThomas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's be real. The paperwork on the vaccine research is not hundreds of thousands of page long. It was a bad bluff by them to avoid releasing information. It's a thousand pages, at best. Nobody is writing 100k pages of documentation on that short of time.

Figure half an hour to write a page and cite sources with 20 people writing without mistakes for 8 hours per day every single day. That's 320 pages per day. 100k pages would take nearly a year to write while doing nothing else. Then it has to be edited, verified, and signed off on various pages a few thousand times.

Not a chance that happened. They lie at every level. Congress writes a couple thousand pages for a big bill and they have a staff of interns work for months on it

2
phibetared 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, but missing one aspect. If I run a statistical analysis on clinical (or otherwise) trial data, I will likely collect the data and run a previously saved computer program script. That script will generate possibly 100 pages in about 5 seconds.

There's a bucket load of graphs involved. Figure two per page. And then maybe I have to generate them once... for each demographic group. White, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Other. 30 seconds to select the demographic group, then click... I have another 100 pages. So now I have 500 pages (100 x 5 demo groups) in a minute or two.

What's that? We need to see the same graphs for each level of co-morbidities? (zero, 1,2,3,4,5 plus) for each demo group? That's 100 x 25 pages... created with a few button clicks.

Then we generate the above for each type of drug we are testing. And maybe they want all of the above for each State (x50).

However... there's NO reason they shouldn't simple supply all of the stuff immediately. They are clearly misleading, falsifying, delaying... something. Likely we can surmise what.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m assuming the data is mostly generated by computer. I can’t imagine what that many pages would entail, but yeah human beings did not sit down and generate a million pages of documents in a couple months.

1
deplorablepepe4 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've been working on this a lot longer than one year.....but good point none the less. I suspect they have staff that are experts at burying details in pages of nonsense. I wouldn't assume they are writing anything from scratch.

2
king07828 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pfizer can argue manpower allocation priorities, e.g., it is more important to review for use than it is to scrub for personally identifying information (PII), thus, lots of people allocated for initial review for emergency use and just a few people allocated to scrub for PII.

HOWEVER, proposing a 50 to 75 year timeline for release of this information looks disgusting and should be deserving of sanctions and being held in contempt of court. E.g., for even proposing such an unreasonable timeline, the attorney that handed it to the judge and the official at the FDA who gave final approval should get a 1 to 5 night stay at a Federal prison

2
caw_86 2 points ago +2 / -0

be prepared for 1000s of fully blacked out pages

1
Kaisgrammy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or it proves that THEY read the data and THEY don’t want YOU to read the data because then YOU will know what THEY did. IMO.

1
Thetruthishere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately I get what OP is trying to correlate but it's the FOIA review office in the FDA that can only review ,500 pages a month. The office that approved of the vaccines was a phase 3 study and they have 700-3000 employees for those reviews. I don't think the vaccines are safe by any means but two different offices

1
schiff_for_brains 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's quite possible that Pfizer didn't hide anything. They well could have provided all kinds of bad data and the FDA were lazy fucks who didn't bother to do their jobs and look at it or analyze it.

When my more regulated customers undergo audits, I provide every single bit of applicable data an auditor might want. In the most unfriendly, least useful file type that is considered acceptable. Since auditors typically over-request data it's quite easy to do.

1
DebfurmNM 1 point ago +1 / -0

And now all the boosted, double, triple vaccinated are spreading covid!

1
barwhack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Math is not taught to woke-slaves.

1
Pepelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut up you anti vax racist hoowhite supreme pizza transphobic climate denying Drumpf supporting bigot!

Did I miss anything?

1
bakahed 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was never approved the fuck are you talking about

1
RevenTexX [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

BNT162b2 Is the vaccine that was approved by FDA.

1
bakahed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok so is the manufacturer liable for the adverse reactions now or nah?

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

We see it clear as a blue sky,, the only issue we have is all the alphabet agencies that headline under law enforcement, are all paid off with corrupt money, and all are in unison with the scheme of things.

1
MAGAlifeChoseMe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wait until op learns how bills are passed LOL

1
OriginalDankStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was 300k and some change. In court they argued that they only had 10-12 employees in the records department to handle all FOIA releases. That’s roughly 90,000 pages a month to actually review vs 500 to redact and release.

1
SmokeyAF 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't want to see their belief system is false, so they go onward, denying.

1
CaptainButthurt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Politicians dont read bills pushed to them. Scientists don't read papers pushed to them. Doctors don't read data pushed to them. Why? Because they get paid better when they look the other way.

1
Data 1 point ago +1 / -0

You aren't wrong, but this is just one of MANY similar red flags.

There's no legal ground for the Emergency Use Authorization either because effective and safe treatment options (alternatives to a vaccine) have existed for decades. But that information has been suppressed in a coordinated misinformation campaign.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand what you're trying to point out.

There is a logical explanation for taking so long to review the documents. They have to react personal information and may redact certain other things the law requires or permits.

Manpower to review 500 pages per month is likely one person and a supervisor. They are definitely slowing the process by not allocating manpower. It isn't a lack of time to understand the material, as you suggest.

1
Plashler 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have a budget in the 10s of billions. To claim they lack manpower is an absurd, ridiculous lie.

2
InarosPrime 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not excusing what they tried to do. I was pointing out how little effort they made.

2
Plashler 2 points ago +2 / -0

No I get that, I was agreeing with you. And they're not even trying to hide it - their claim is so ridiculous that it's basically spitting in our faces and laughing about it