1506
Comments (53)
sorted by:
29
2008RonPaul2012 29 points ago +31 / -2

I like Matt Walsh. I don't care about purity tests like a leftist cult member

4
notCIA 4 points ago +5 / -1

He's so-so. He's Catholic which caps his based level, but we agree on quite a bit.

2
MagaGamer 2 points ago +4 / -2

Being Catholic is based

1
notCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Based, as in, lowly. Christianity without the worship of man ftw.

0
MasterOfIllusions 0 points ago +1 / -1

nuh-uh they like, worship Mary and the Pope and the saints as gods! Also they support pedophilia and homosexuality. Trust me bro.

--low-information Christians.

1
DogFacedPepeSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with Catholicism is that it builds an entire theological superstructure on a misinterpretation of a single verse.

If you want a liturgical church structure, by my assessment the Orthodox church is the only scriptural sound option. I say this. as a protestant.

That being said, we shouldn't be fighting over this.

1
MasterOfIllusions 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not shopping around to try a new flavor of Christianity; if one's faith is so easy to change, it's not faith at all.

I don't know enough about protestantism to have a problem with it. What I have a problem with are the internet protestants who think that supplementing their ignorance of my faith with a few convenient verses makes them infallible. They don't even want to understand, they just want to be smug, and like R*ddit atheists, they think that they can make converts by telling people how terrible their faith is. They deserve to be made fun of.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
JediMasterGandalf 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's clearly Ron Paul, Egghead. I mean, just look at his username fer chrissake.

1
dr_gonzo 1 point ago +4 / -3

I don't run purity tests. I don't like the Daily Wire crew due to their authoritarian stances. Walsh isn't as bad as Knowles, but they're basically in favor of enshrining their own religious morality into law. For example, banning porn. I have no interest in the government deciding what is and is not moral enough for me to look at.

Plus, they're basically in favor of just perpetuating the current U.S. They have no interest in taking the bold steps that would actually destroy leftism, like repealing the 16th amendment. Or ending the fed. Or closing down federal departments. They're totally fine with all of that, which is extremely short sighted.

We arrived at this point due to very specific Marxist mechanisms that were installed into our society. If we're not going to be willing to remove those mechanisms, we have no hope of ever returning to liberty.

3
Quixotic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure you are. Do you want child pornto be legal? Of course not. You just disagree on where the line is.

1
DogFacedPepeSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

legislating morality is basically required for a society. Even if you are an anarchist, I bet you at least subscribe to the NAP.

Well the NAP is based in morality as much as any other societal restriction.

Porn is an extremely corrosive and destructive force on society. It is addictive and stimulates the same brain centers as cocaine. And it's readily available to 8 years olds 24/7. (I use 8 as an example because I'm know of a lady seeking help for her 8 year old son who is badly addicted to it)

In addition to this, the manufacturing of porn is tied to the drug and sex slavery trade.

Do you ever wonder why it's free? PornHub alone is one of the most trafficked sites on the web with a massive library and massive overhead and it's just.... free? You're the product. They want you to be addicted and lazy. They want to burn out your dopamine receptors to kill your ambitions. Porn use has been linked to increases in homosexuality.

Porn is a vehicle by which all the rest of their ridiculous bullshit comes unto the society.

Ban that shit.

1
Shively 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't mind him. I don't think its a purity test so much as sometimes you have people you can just tell are repeating talking points from the right and grifting.. I would say Tim Pool being one of them

11
ArizonaDesertRat2021 11 points ago +11 / -0

Haven’t heard the term “brats” since I was a kid (or a brat). Too funny!

3
notCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I BBQ brats most weekends.

4
Jackhererer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Insert Homer drooling.gif

9
chickeninoven 9 points ago +11 / -2

I had a friend tell me that everyone should return to a more agrarian, self-sufficient lifestyle, and that would afford them more time to focus on personal pursuits and hobbies.

His experience with growing is limited to a potted basil plant he bought at the grocery store.

5
notCIA 5 points ago +6 / -1

Kek. He doesn't know what wealth is. He doesn't understand that working a 9-5 and being able to live off that is an incredible shift in human history that wasn't possible without modern technology. If he wants to go be a hunter gatherer, or even farm for a living, he isn't going to have half the spare time he does now. Poverty is the natural order of things.

5
Comntrinchief 5 points ago +6 / -1

Let’s be honest. He would be dead within 10 days.

2
learntocode 2 points ago +3 / -1

Needs more upvotes.

2
DogFacedPepeSoldier 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just compiling the list of everything I need to do to get my garden ready for the spring is frigging exhausting. Implementing it is gonna be a bitch and a half. Doesn't help that I'm starting late :/

8
True-Grit 8 points ago +8 / -0

Truth needs no fans.

5
JackOfDiamonds 5 points ago +5 / -0

Say it, Matt: whites. White men invented literally everything that exists.

A world with the white men removed from it would have... let's see... windshield wipers and peanut putter. Good luck with that, everyone.

5
bigred0241 5 points ago +5 / -0

Endless victim culture may eventually demand that you actually are a victim. Creating the environment to make yourself a victim would grant enormous victimhood status, and moral superiority along with it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Dev404 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct on every point. For those who don't know, there are actual matriarchal societies out there that were matriarchal from the very beginning. They all have similar traits too: they're all extremely primitive, they keep their men weak and fewer in number, they're smaller civilizations located in difficult to reach places with just enough resources to survive, and they only exist because surrounding societies don't deem it worth their trouble to reign these matriarchies in since they bring nothing essential, are not a threat because their men are so weak and fewer in number, and finding them will cost more resources than they will get back.

2
learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a lot of ignorance of the absolute geniuses that toiled to bring us the marvels we take for granted.

AC power generation alone, solid state electrical components, materials science, agricultural practices, the list of great dead white guys should inspire and motivate us all. Such a small proportion of the human species accounting for so much - really something special.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
HillarysFatAss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Matt is great. He's a satirical "smart ass". I can relate to him.

1
17-45Pepe45_17 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's always been right.

1
Hullohoomans 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if the primitive culture I idolize is crusades-era Europe?

1
Boruzu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are we talking about Wakanda here?????

1
Metro 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s says a lot of good stuff, I like him on the whole. Wish we could get him away from his censorship masters at the DailyGlobalistWire.

1
SteersBeersandQueers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty much explains it

1
cbonez416 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought he was a leftist shill!!!

1
nova7733 1 point ago +1 / -0

Matt is GREAT! One of the best in my opinion.

1
TwelveMoreYears 1 point ago +1 / -0

Millennials! They're still expecting a trophy for being losers.

0
Keepidahofree 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't know.... Amish is looking more and more appealing. I come from Mennonite colonizers.

-12
FitOfficial -12 points ago +6 / -18

"Not a fan of him, but I ceaselessly promote him even though he's an anti-Trump ConInc faggot."

Fall in a woodchipper feet first.

11
IntrepidBurger 11 points ago +14 / -3

If you limit your activists to only those who are pure sycophants you ought not be surprised when your ideology goes nowhere.

MAGA works because it's large-tent. It appeals to pro-Trump and anti-Trump. As long as the message is MAGA then it's worth disseminating.

-1
FitOfficial -1 points ago +6 / -7

Fuck you, fuck Matt Walsh, and fuck Ben Shapiro. Man up and pay for an advertising campaign instead of using this site to get free clicks for your lukewarm safe tweets.

5
IntrepidBurger 5 points ago +9 / -4

Not how you win the messaging battle.

1
FitOfficial 1 point ago +4 / -3

Shilling for MAGA-backstabbing Daily Wire whores isn't "winning the messaging war" either.

It's growing lil Benji's bank account and nothing more.

2
IntrepidBurger 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't give a fuck if Shapiro makes a trillion dollars.

The only thing that matters is MAGA, which means winning the culture war.

0
FitOfficial 0 points ago +1 / -1

The people you're promoting don't want MAGA. They aren't MAGA. They make fun of MAGA.

I'd tell you to stop being retarded but you can't seem to help it.

0
IntrepidBurger 0 points ago +2 / -2

They don't. You have a very narrow idea of what MAGA is. Spoiler: it's not your tiny, limited worldview.

If anyone other than Walsh had said this comment you'd be all for it. That's proof that it's MAGA. You're just being an autistic twit.

2
Metro 2 points ago +3 / -1

Right on dude!!!!!!!! Exactly!

1
SaltyNewMexico 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. exactly.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
Metro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep!

1
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 1 point ago +1 / -0

fippy bippy