3372
Comments (94)
sorted by:
110
ravioli_king 110 points ago +110 / -0

1 interview vs 2 years of "brought to you by big pharma."

71
MAGAMOPAR 71 points ago +71 / -0

Pfizer. What NPCs crave.

11
Bdbdbdbdbfffbrnfbr5 11 points ago +12 / -1

remember when dr robert epstein released a study on big tech Censorship and the democrats claimed it didn't exist?

5
anon073121 5 points ago +5 / -0

because it's got hydras, graphene, and electrolytes.

90
togger 90 points ago +90 / -0

Irony is always lost on the left

48
Brobold 48 points ago +48 / -0

The Left operates under "the end justifies the means". They will lie, cheat, and steal if it means victory. Once the majority of Conservatives realize this, we can see actual push-back.

34
NataliePortmanteau 34 points ago +35 / -1

Conservatives have to realize this is the Final Battle and we can go back to being honorable after victory is secured. We keep making the fatal mistake assuming our enemies have morals, values, and standards.

10
R-A-T-S- 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well there is also the mistake that you think you can fight something that exists in depravity by trying to be depraved as well. Trying to go down to their level doesn't mean you'll ever be able to match them. Trying to match them only gives them permission to go lower.

The main issue is we don't have something to really unify us anymore.

7
Ninebucks 7 points ago +7 / -0

If any one of us were to say "hey meet here to discuss x" we immediately get labeled as glowies.

7
R-A-T-S- 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well for a few reasons. The first is its often not just "Lets meet here to discuss" Its "Lets get all of guns and gather here to protest and put the fear of god into people." -Thats pretty glowie or dumb.

The topic of X is also a point of contention as well. If you're just talking grooming habbits of a irish wolfhound, then you're probally not going to be called a glowie. But if its secret plans on how you're going to rob a bank or something.. Thats pretty glowie.

My suggestion? Lets do local BBQs. Get people local involved. Don't talk politics. Not for the first BBQ. After like 2 or 3 of them, then you can start. This helps to weed out glowies and dumbasses who'd tell a glowie everything. But remain vigilent.

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +4 / -3

Retarded fucking post. I mean, helmet and window licking included.

Name one fucking time anyone on here said let’s get all our guns and meet up s Der her der her.

Idiot ass mf

1
LawlAndDisorder 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would make a joke about having guns and bbq, but I’m too tired to have the FBI knock at my door today.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean half dozen or so times (at least) that people are like "We need to have an armed protest to put the fear of god into these people."

Your post is so fucking retarded it makes Sotomayor look like a genius in comparison

2
yuppa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Return to church.

3
unicornpoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Churches are dens of liberal rhetoric. Masks, vaxx, OBEY, the works. No thanks.

2
yuppa 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think you have been misled. At this point in time Churches are where you will find like minded people to organize with to resist this great evil

0
Bdbdbdbdbfffbrnfbr5 0 points ago +1 / -1

u can win a war by using the enemeis tactics.

if ur too proud to do so then u will lose

and you will deserve to lose

2
LumerjackPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can also win the war while keeping your morality intact. Which is the only way to correct this. We fall because we distance our self from that morality, removing the blessing of God. This is more than just a battle for physical property, it is a battle of your soul as well.

1
NataliePortmanteau 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kind of seems like we need some sort of movement centered around nationalism, traditionalism, and conservatism that are ready to kill and have the coordination and numbers to not just have a handful of radicals end up in prison forever. The goal would be to do what Jan 6th should have been: insurrection and takeover.

1
BillPigg 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, bring our guns?

1
NataliePortmanteau 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's more like, the only way any movement can take anything by force is if they have the numbers and solidarity. 1000 people bringing their guns to a protest won't do anything if they don't fire them. How about 10,000 people show up to the steps of congress with AR-15s and point them at the capitol and keep firing and moving forward until they've massacred everyone standing between them and the chambers. That aughta kick things off in the right direction.

1
BillPigg 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be a good look on the news. For the government.

Who do you think would fire the first shot. Anyone? No one on our side wants senselessly kill another American.

You're obviously not with the FBI or ATF. They would want to creates a situation where someone would get motivated to do such an act so that they could come in and wipe us out and claim they put down an insurrection. Just like they claimed they did a year ago.

Look at the optics.

1
Walt_Kowalski 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is precisely why they must be forced into submission or removed from power.

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +2 / -1

You can't fight evil with evil but you can fight evil. You overwhelm it with truth and action.

People must be loud, motivated, and relentless for this to happen.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is only one way to fight evil with evil, and that is to have evil devour itself. 4chan needs to make a few more psyop type of things to push that effect though.

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

You just showed exactly why we can't stoop to their level. The whole reason we're fighting them is because they don't have morals or values or standards. If we sacrifice those things to fight them, we become them and the fight is over, with us losing. They win by convincing us that we need to become them to defeat them. That's why we're constantly losing ground; because we keep trying to win by forfeiting everything we're fighting for.

1
NataliePortmanteau 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then what the hell are we supposed to.do? What's the answer? Sit back, lay flat, and hope their machinations fail? Even if they do, the destruction it will cause...

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

Romans 12:20–21: To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head." Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

 

You keep on keeping on. Fight wrong with right, fight evil with good, fight injustice with justice. They want the whole world to stoop to their level and abandon morality and give up being principled. That is the war; you win it by continuing everything they want destroyed. They want you to believe those things are holding you back because those are the only things keeping them at bay.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

we can go back to being honorable after victory is secured

Wrong. The aggressor sets the rules. The left has decided there are no rules, therefore there are no rules. We must do whatever it takes to drive them from the public and private sphere. Forever.

1
0care 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is always the final battle. Communists will never stop trying to take power

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every generation since Cain and Abel.

59
Watermirror 59 points ago +59 / -0

there's no such thing as Mass Psychosis, that would require the coordination of major powers, and that's silly to think that there's a group of people that would coordinate to such an extent to pull that off.

this one guy, Dr Malone, is engaging in mass psychosis all by himself.

35
bangbus 35 points ago +35 / -0

There’s a book by a hard leftist Chomsky called “Manufacturing Consent.” It is from 1988 so a bit dated, but goes into detail about how with no actual coordination every media outfit in essence produces the same news. So a cacophony of identical voices doesn’t even need coordination, it just happens naturally in our system.

Namely one big reason for it is what he calls the “sourcing filter.” Almost all news comes from the same sources and the narrative is rarely questioned. No one will ever actually “fact check” something like the CDC or NIH. And many organizations just reproduce whatever AP and Reuters churn out. The cost of actual investigative reporting is insanely high. The cost of licensing a story from AP is low. Which do they do?

12
memechallenger33 12 points ago +12 / -0

Same reason doctors do a lot of stuff that is just because another doctor told them about it. Sure, they might fact check (read the medical literature) once in a while, but mostly they don't have time to do that, and when they do, they find it's a waste of time for various reasons like 1) there is no evidence for or against that treatment, but it's just something that all the doctors "know" (like that parachutes work to prevent death when jumping from airplanes at altitude), or 2) the evidence backs up the treatment (ie, waste of time looking this up when the doc could have just believed the other doc), or 3) the evidence contradicts the treatment in an asinine way such as the study on how jumping out of planes does not cause death even without a parachute, if the plane is on the ground (also waste of time because the real question is not addressed). So, overall, fact checking is for the most part thankless work, and expensive with time/money, so why bother? It's not like people like your work more because you actually checked it first.

6
masticator_nord 6 points ago +6 / -0

Then, when they do read the literature, they only read the abstracts because they don't have time to read full papers, so they don't see that the data/methodology is actually nonsense.

3
glasses2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

and how many of the people that do read them, are actually able to recognize bad data and methodology? This is the entire point of peer review.

1
memechallenger33 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most peers are just as clueless as the authors. My doctor friend with training in statistics said easily half of the papers in the number one pediatrics journal had major statistical errors rendering them useless.

6
standonthewall 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also the reason that most believe the big lies. Too much work to disprove them over and over, and people hate you for it.

4
PocketPosse 4 points ago +5 / -1

Mandatory upvote for thorough awesomeness.

2
FudgyFudgeBots 2 points ago +2 / -0

Med school is a form of mass formation.

Med students accept whatever they are taught and changing their minds is near impossible.

As a PA I worked alongside docs for 20 years. They were solidly brainwashed in med school (aka big pharma school) .

They wouldn't even listen to an idea of an alternative treatment besides the one they were taught. It was like working with robots.

4
zkSfp 4 points ago +4 / -0

🙋🏼‍♂️I work in big media. The amount of people who overestimate the actual people and actions in these places is something I gave up talking about.

There’s no massive conspiracy with these networks and publications. Just 99.99% of the workforce is over worked and copy pasting things from AP & The NYT.

Sure, some super high execs all talk with each other and game plan long term strategies… but more often than not… Some 26 year old just googling the story and cleverly not plagiarizing the piece.

They’re* just useful idiots.

3
bangbus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, that’s his point. He says there’s no conspiracy it’s just a cost savings measure. He also elaborates on the “advertising license” which is that you can’t piss off the ad buyers. They are now all lockstep with every DNC talking point, which is another avenue of creating a singular voice out of disparate sources. We saw this at play with Facebook in 2020. Huge companies threatened to withdraw massive ad dollars if they didn’t bend the knee. How normy leftists are too dumb to pick up on the fact that they are just regurgitating carefully curated big corporate propaganda is utterly beyond me. It’s downright terrifying as well.

3
whybag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Serendipitous conspiracy.

1
LibertarianXian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a film similarly named that's worth watching. https://www.bitchute.com/video/R3MF5GgKXpmQ/

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except that there is coordination. See 'Journ o list.'

22
Trump_Underground 22 points ago +22 / -0

I didn't need Dr. Malone to state the obvious, I've seen the psychosis clouds forming with my own two eyes. People have lost touch with reality, and they're injecting God only knows what into their bodies. All in the name of worshiping science like some sort of cult.

11
NotAHandshake 11 points ago +11 / -0

I truly think we're like one or two unhinged press releases away from some WW2 Germany stuff where people attack unvaccinated/unmuzzled people in the streets. All it would take is a couple of the usual dementia statements slipping out, and the news would pick it up, then NPCs would get their firmware update.

Call me a crazy leftist nu-feminist fearmongerer, but I constantly tell my wife she needs to get a CCW gun + training of her own because she's surrounded by people who are one MKUltra sort of signal away from raping and killing her -- and they wouldn't know exactly why they were doing it; they just would because SCIENCE AND THE GREATER GOOD.

1
SenorTrumper 1 point ago +2 / -1

+20

3
glasses2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

We know what's in the vaccines. We've seen how effective they are. We've seen the rare side effects. We know the companies that make the vaccines are making record profits.

There's no question what's going on. People aren't reporting truthfully. On both sides.

4
DiscoverAFire 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pfizer Annual Revenue Copypasta

Billion$
100 |
 90  |
 80  |                                                 82
 70  |
 60  |
 50  |
 40  |                                    42
 30  |
 20  |   
 10  |     13       13      13  
 0   +-------------------------------------------------
 Year  2017   2018   2019   2020   2021
0
BidensButtWiper 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exactly. I've seen what was going on for the last 4 years. I just didn't know what it was called

19
Tenspot20 19 points ago +19 / -0

Mass Dumbass Psychosis

15
PortugueseMamaC 15 points ago +15 / -0

Anyone who's been in a relationship with a sociopath, narcissist, or borderline -- romantic, parent, sibling, child -- can see right through this.

The problem is, there A LOT of mentally disturbed ppl who bought into the vax and a surprising number of ppl that have never been conned severely enough to recognize the game.

7
RadMaxBTD 7 points ago +7 / -0

Many weak people like the job of feeding the narcissist. It gives them meaning.

3
unicornpoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

That some people can't even comprehend that they can be lied to amazes me. Our society is made up of adult children. So naive, like they've never lived to have any negative experiences to gain wisdom from.

1
PortugueseMamaC 1 point ago +1 / -0

name checks out. :)

7
Upvotes4trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Should we 'let that sink in'?

6
DonttrustChina 6 points ago +6 / -0

But if it's possible that Malone himself is causing mass formation psychosis...then mass formation psychosis is real.

5
SaltyKrakenBalls 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mass Formation Cognitive Dissonance

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
FudgyFudgeBots 9 points ago +9 / -0

Mass formation has been around for at least a century. It just didnt have a name.

Many people have wondered how an entire country would try to exterminate a group of people. Or how communists are able to control millions of starving g people preventing them from rioting. Or how a government can convince millions of people to inject an experimental cocktail into their bodies.

The formula is easy. Instill fear and the people will do whatever you want. That's mass formation in a nutshell.

5
Tyrone_biggums 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fear, but also social and spiritual deprivation

4
TheBestDuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is this the culmination of the death of God Nietzsche warned us about?

5
DarkMemeDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's simple when you remember that the left always projects. Always.

5
t_l_winks 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s really a hypothesis…they are making it a tested theory.

2
RadMaxBTD 2 points ago +2 / -0

A Triple Dog MFP!!! Somebody is getting stuck to a frozen pole.

2
Joeverhisskies 2 points ago +3 / -1

Easiest way to explain this: They are using Mass Formation Psychosis strategies to disprove Mass Formation Psychosis Theory.

Fantastic.

1
DontApologize 1 point ago +1 / -0

No problem for them. It's fairly ingenious. They have been doing it to Trump voters for years now. They tell you things you like "you actually hate Trump - he just gas lighted you into liking him." Or "you are part of cult."

The right is always scratching their head - pointing out contradictions. The left just goes with what works. Calling people racist while being racist? It works. It works very very well. There are legions of suburban women who buy into it.

You do not need a consistent logical message to win people over. You just speak earnestly about the evil of the bad guys - aka Republicans and you win. Rhetoric is much more powerful then the dialectic.

1
heeeeeemeyer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like I tell my wife when I'm gaslighting her and she accuses me of gaslighting: a false claim of gaslighting is itself a form of gaslighting.

1
Tyrone_biggums 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is an example of the abuse of the word “gaslight.”

1
tiamat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't it literally one of their rules to accuse the opposite side of whatever you're doing

1
covfefe_energy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Accusing him of doing the thing that doesn't exist?

When have Demoncrats ever done that?

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

Think about all the CCP trolls online trying to push back saying « no no these mass formation psychosis don’t exist »’hahahahahahahahhaha

1
FiresideRant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh it's absolutely possible that is exactly what is going on.

The problem is that if the left was moral, ethical, honest, and had a shred of integrity, they would be going about this in a completely different and rational manner.

Often times it's their reactions that expose them to be the evil ones.

1
TheNoseGoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe in the mass formation and many points by Malone. But he's close friends with a spook that helped develop bio weapons for darpa and has been involved at Wuhan.

So let's not put him on a pedestal. He still makes valid points though.

1
DicerningSword 1 point ago +1 / -0

Propagandists foundational belief is facts are manufactured, a product of social programming..

Those of us who believe Fact and Truth are things to be discovered will be forever in contention with the children of the lie, those who believe they deconstruct as they see fit and shape reality through force of will...

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m so fucking done with propaganda! Once the ship is righted, propaganda will be ILLEGAL AGAIN. Fuck the lying ass, cock sucking faggot ass Democrats for ever making it legal.

1
DaemonKrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a rule, the left always accuses others of that which they are guilty.

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

It IS real and it's alternative name is THE LUCIFER EFFECT coined by world renowned Stanford psychologist Dr. Philip Zimbardo

https://youtu.be/OsFEV35tWsg?t=415

1
philnmdg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait until 5G kicks in and all they have to do is turn a dial to make all their graphene heads attack Malone.

1
saltloach 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is Mass Formationception

1
PocketPosse 1 point ago +2 / -1

The mental backflips necessary to be a leftist is painful to observe.

1
VaccineInducedAIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen lol

1
GravityBounce1976 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Dr. Malone is giving a mass number of people a psychosis formulated by his fake theory of Mass Formation Psychosis"....

1
rossiFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mass Formation Psychosis.

1
BASEDMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dOnT gEt It

1
beansieman1911 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cult thinking is a hell of a drug.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
WacoKid90 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol of all he said thats your biggest counter argument

-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
4
SenorTrumper 4 points ago +6 / -2

Deport this FBI troll.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +1 / -11
0
SenorTrumper 0 points ago +1 / -1

The book of eclisiasstes clearly states that when we die we are dead. There is no afterlife.