954
Comments (86)
sorted by:
88
Raven2685 88 points ago +88 / -0

No such thing as a mild case of myocarditis

49
DCdeplorable 49 points ago +49 / -0

If half of them die within 10 years, then the vaccine will kill 10x more than covid by their own fake numbers

33
Maga2020Maga2020 33 points ago +33 / -0

That 30-40 is most likely 1000x worse.

The all lie.

17
alanlovestea 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's someone else's problem, isn't it. By the time the disaster happens, she has retired already.

26
FreshFriggy [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

This is the most concerning gaslighting effort I may have ever seen. There is no such thing as a "mild case of an inflamed heart". Could you imagine what a severe case of myocarditis looks like?

15
unmaskedpanda 15 points ago +15 / -0

A severe case is you die a few days after your second booster and declared not fully vaccinated.

9
Nerdrem1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Sure there is, it's just a question of scale. A mild case of myocarditis is simply not as bad as a severe case. However in this context "mild" doesn't mean inconsequential like it does for a cold or something, although people will tend to comprehend it in that way; they know this and intentionally use that language to deliberately mislead people.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Bottle_of_Memes 11 points ago +11 / -0

So 40 kids with permanent heart damage to avoid one 80 year old dying. Even if their numbers are correct (which they probably aren't) it makes them look like absolute PSYCHOPATHS.

4
CaptainButthurt 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are absolute psychopaths

7
MedPede2 7 points ago +7 / -0

No such thing as a mild case of myocarditis

A heart attack a day, flattens Covid 14 days.

35
kchawaii 35 points ago +36 / -1

She's not retarded! She is evil!

5
CaptainButthurt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why not both?

31
vongregormench 31 points ago +31 / -0

The biggest stupid of all is pretending that myocarditis is the only side effect. It probably isn’t even the most common adverse effect.

9
Yeehaw-McKickass 9 points ago +9 / -0

Short term side effect's. We haven't even gotten to the long term ones yet.

4
Bottle_of_Memes 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's the one that sneaked into the Overton window, so now they focus all the attention on it take attention from the rest.

22
steelywebb 22 points ago +22 / -0

myocarditis in someone young is 50% death within 5 years. So she basically is saying that 15-20 children will die to save one with this vaccine.

10
chickeninoven 10 points ago +11 / -1

You heard her, the benefits far outweigh the risks.

hisssssssssssssssss

1
fazaman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assuming that one kid wouldn't have died from the next cold or flu they got anyway. That one kid was probably dealing with several comorbiditiies and was knocking on deaths door to start with.

So, 30-40 previously healthy kids have life long heart issues to keep one kid, who was probably going to die soon anyway, from dying of, specifically, covid.

16
throwaway777 16 points ago +16 / -0

Do the math....

36
Fignugent 36 points ago +39 / -3

literally the ONLY thing that matters in that list of bullshit is the 1 death. everything else has no bearing whatsoever

1 death in 1 million

to PROVE that you actually saved that ONE FUCKING LIFE, you would have needed to do a study, where you tested 2 million 12-17 year olds. 1 million with the vaccine and 1 million without. and in the 1 million without vaccines ONE FUCKING PERSON MORE died

think about that

1 out of 1 million. 1/1,000,000 that's one THOUSANDTH of a percent. scientific margin of error is AT LEAST 3%

that means your "proof" can't even break the margin of error to prove itself as being a real delta

THE VACCINES DON'T DO SHIT EXCEPT GIVE YOU FREE MYOCARDITIS

20
MAGAconvert 20 points ago +21 / -1

Mathematician here. You would actually need between 5-10 million in your both groups or more as the standard deviation would be around 2-3 deaths (meaning with 5,000,000 there’s still a 3% chance of 0 deaths and thus your results are inconclusive at best).

This you’d need 10-20 million children in your trial. So basically most of the children in that age range in America.

12
panthicc 12 points ago +12 / -0

So basically most of the children in that age range in America.

And by golly, they'll get that sample even if they have to mandate covid shots for every public school in the cou-- oh.

6
Fignugent 6 points ago +8 / -2

thank you mister I AM THE MATH

-1
Test_user21 -1 points ago +1 / -2

nah, that might work in a pure setting, but having done work for CROs in the past, you need 15-30 ish from a sample of each age group and ethnic background, so maybe 300ish total. The FDA knows how to get what data it needs

9
vongregormench 9 points ago +9 / -0

That one death still occurs, by their own admission the vaccine works poorly on the least healthy.

5
Sekoms 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sadly not only does that one death still occurs after giving 30-40 (likely far higher) children myocarditis we could see anywhere from a 20 to 50% mortality rate among those children in the next 5 years.

3
NimbleNavigator20202 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like how she skated around potential Virus Myocarditis, starting to think more and more that it's just not a thing in young kids

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
CRIMESTOP 2 points ago +2 / -0

One thousandth of a percent, though

1/1000 x 1/100 isn't 1/1'000'000

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

and fucked it up

1
biggerthanyours 1 point ago +1 / -0

Walensky: Derp, what are maths?

11
ChuckedIntoAVan 11 points ago +11 / -0

So one death, which we can assume is a very unhealthy young person, with some comorbidities if not already seriously ill. As opposed to 30-40 teenagers with permanent cardiac issues and most likely a shortened life expectancy. Does this retarded bitch even know what myocarditis is? Just because they don’t instantly fall over dead does not mean it’s mild. I hate these liars so much.

4
the-new-style 4 points ago +4 / -0

she knows but she just doesn't care

10
Shaffro 10 points ago +10 / -0

That bitch is insane.

9
Tenspot20 9 points ago +9 / -0

"At some point they will realize that the things they say in the media will be used in court."

-Soup-

5
ChuckedIntoAVan 5 points ago +5 / -0

From your lips to God’s ears.

7
OldGreg 7 points ago +7 / -0

🤦🏻‍♂️

7
POTUS_DonnieJ 7 points ago +7 / -0

This statement/tweet/interview is from months ago. Completely ignored. Basically saying we’re going to kill 15-20 kids and permanently disable 15-20 kids to save just 1 life.

That being said, Dr. Peter McCullough on Joe Rogan seemed to imply that some cases of myocarditis are recoverable.

6
SCP0073 6 points ago +6 / -0

THEN MAKE THEM LIABLE

4
Test_user21 4 points ago +4 / -0

Early Life section, that's all you need to know

2
nickybops 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are using VAERS lack of reporting lf adverse effects as propaganda. The fact they are mentioning mydocarditis rn is a big red flag. They are about to run a huge propaganda campaign on this.

2
GreyKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I couldn't be around these people without flying into a murderous rage...any rational medical professional would argue that even if we had an effective vaccine, you would prioritize those at the highest risk...? How unhealthy are they and what factors make them the 1 in 40,000,000 death...? How would such odds ever justify charging and mandating all of America...? 1 in 40,000,000 are better chances of survival than from even the doctored numbers of the vax

This is the most illogical argument I have ever seen. This single twatter post is a crime against humanity...

2
angrysnowpede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those post injection inflammation stats are way low, from what we now know from latest studies. Inflammation also doesn't discriminate between healthy and sick, while those hospital stats are almost exclusively already very sick kids (morbid obesity, cystic fibrosis, cancers, feeding tubes,etc.).

But, yes, people are that retarded.

2
Peashout 2 points ago +2 / -0

They meant 30-40 thousand right?

2
TeachMeHowToWin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure... but 49 of the 50 ICU stays and the single death are people who can already be expected to be at risk (obese, seriously ill, immunocompromised), and they have likely already obtained both the vaccine and the virus.

So really, this is giving 30-40 (closer to 300-400, given VAERS underreporting) healthy teenagers myocarditis so the fatties aren't alone in the risk of being murdered by the vaccine.

2
johnqpublic864 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep I have the faggot ass China Virus right fucking now. It sucks, but I'd take having it again and again over having a fucking blood clot or heart attack.

1
tom_of_rj_fame 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well there is a lot of post-vac 'died suddenly' and died in their sleep going around. Way more peaceful than staying up all night with China virus. Which you will catch anyways.

1
Tayzen 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are well and truly fucked if we continue to allow these evil unelected monsters to dictate our lives. I hope hell is real!

0
the-new-style 0 points ago +1 / -1

aka the JQ

1
Dantalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

They aren't just intellectual infants - they are intellectual infants that experienced massive brain damage, then were left by the side of the road for weeks as their brain function ebbed toward nonexistent. Then they were taken to the hospital and hooked up to a ventilator, but it wasn't turned on. Now they are brain-dead...and in control of every power structure in the U.S.

1
im_baaaaaaaaaack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every day I am reminded more and more why I hate our government.

1
crackerstacker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought for sure that was fake tweet making fun of the CDC. But holy shit it's real. These people are SICK

1
cook_does 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. They are grossly understating the myocardium cases.

  2. One Covid death < 50x early deaths caused by myocardium.

  3. The net result will be a sterilized population, resulting in a massive decrease in population equivalent to many more deaths. On second thought, they should just go ahead and do this in the inner city. Lord knows the whole abortion thing only exists to reduce minority populations, maybe this would let them finish them off

1
Johnny108 1 point ago +1 / -0

Touch my child, you die. put that into your calculations.

1
schiff_for_brains 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now do month 3, when the stab offers no protection.

1
Tiberium 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be a shame if all of these evil communists got a mild case of being thrown out of a helicopter

1
ChynahIzAzzhole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lies.

1
Flynski 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soooo.... To save ONE life we are sacrificing 30-40... alright.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Nunya__Biznus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now admit that the 50 ICU stays are all 300lb hippo-kids...

1
DicerningSword 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's diagnosed it's not mild.. For every diagnosed case of permanent heart damage their will be many more undiagnosed instances of cardiovascular injury..

1
libman 1 point ago +1 / -0

All those numbers have been pulled out of Fauci's ass.

1
Farqquard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still fucking lying. Hiding side effects and REAL vax injury numbers.

1
StrangerThanFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. They only mention one potential adverse event. What about anaphylaxis, guillane-barre, autoimmune issues, and whatever the hell long term adverse events show up years later. Pfizer's own documents admitted they do not know the long term effects of even just the myocarditis, let alone everything else.

1
UsernameKeksOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

So a 1 in a million chance of death or 1 in 25,000 chance. Diversity hires are the best

1
nutmeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

"benefits far outweigh"? By what metric?

1
Boobarino 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is admitting that left unvaccinated, the rate of infection is. 8% . That's LESS THAN 1%. Isn't that less than the seasonal flue which I recall is between 1- 2%????

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CousinLennyrd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Death is their highest ideal, so yes a treatment that results in more deaths is a benefit to them.

1
MessengerOfChange 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. 200 hospitalizations out of 8000 cases? So she is claiming an over 2% hospitalization rate for 12 to 17-year-olds who are barely affected by this? I think they are still forgetting that we know the difference between hospitalized “with“ Covid versus “for“ Covid.
1
CaptainButthurt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of those 30-40 cases, half will die within 5 years... So effectively these vaxxes kill 15-20x more kids than covid by their own retarded twisted logic.

1
y_do_i_need_to_hide 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not retarded, they just refuse to use their own mind

1
Smurfection 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic’s observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%. Survival with giant cell myocarditis is substantially lower, with <20% of patients surviving 5 years

Verified myocarditis has a mortality rate of 20% in the first year, a 56% mortality rate in the first five years and for giant cell myocarditis, less than 20% survive five years. Myocarditis is not mild.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/circulationaha.105.584532

1
PonySoldier66 1 point ago +1 / -0

but that math has been the same since the beginning - 98% chance of surviving or 98% chance of surviving, PLUS vaccine unknowns.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Goatboy66 1 point ago +1 / -0

As usual, Proof shes One Dumb Fucking Idiot, shes as sharp as a Box of Rocks. None, Zip, Zero Common Sense.

1
Nanook 1 point ago +1 / -0

"30-40 MILD cases of myocarditis?" Life expectancy of even MILD myocarditis EQUALS much shortened life span equals DEATH (sometimes in 3-5 years?).

I'll take Door#2- no shot/lower risk.

1
rentfREEEE_since2016 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm. 1 death? Or 40 lifelong debilitating heart conditions requiring a lifetime of medical treatment?

Even the economics tell you the vax is bullshit.

1
NoComment 1 point ago +1 / -0

could

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0