1171
Comments (154)
sorted by:
140
Tom94 140 points ago +142 / -2

Why do people give this low iq faggot the time. He believes he's the smartest person in the room. When the people who come up with the "conspiracy" theories is an clear example of best ideas rise. It's a combination of two years of reality where speculative people of all intellects sharing information and agreeing to some variation that there is a globalist push, the vaccine was the mechanism to push it, the virus included and anything that could stomp this mechanism out had to be stopped. Thus the blockage and lies about alternative treatments.

50
DeportAntifa 50 points ago +50 / -0

He can eat a bag of shitty dicks. Fuck Scott Adams.

21
King4 21 points ago +25 / -4

Updoot for the username.

-41
deleted -41 points ago +4 / -45
20
InterloperKO 20 points ago +20 / -0

^ Account has one comment and this is it with stalker's user name

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
MeinDonald -1 points ago +6 / -7

He's not wrong tho. King4 is more than likely a fed and thus... a faggot

Edit: who writes comments like him "updoot for the username. Am I right fellow centipedes"

4
peterstrzoked 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do that sometimes. But I’m also a fed so there’s that…

Spez: former fed, lol

13
Judiwont 13 points ago +13 / -0

Since I first came here I’ve always wondered that.

7
Dunkin4COVAIDS 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't know why anyone gives any celebrity the time of day. Regardless of what they say, why the fuck are they listening to a fucking celebrity as if their opinion matters on anything?

2
americandrunk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great analysis! Agreed.

-39
V2021 -39 points ago +2 / -41

Great theory. Now we need proof of it. I know it’s hard for you to believe, but just because you have an idea in your head doesn’t mean it’s true. Remember Q?

25
BillionsAndBillions 25 points ago +26 / -1

Well that's all totally true. There has been absolutely no mainstream opposition to discussion of therapeutics, and no suppression of any studies in support of them whatsoever. The news media and social media embrace and welcome all valid inquiry and research challenging the vaccines, and the idea that pharmaceutical companies have any undue influence over the regulatory agencies is of course totally laughable, as is the idea that these amazing companies have some profit motive in curing the worst disease to ever plague the human race. This is about our health!!

9
IAbsolutelyDare 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well that sounds hunky dory. I welcome our insect overlords!

5
BillionsAndBillions 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm sure they know best!!

9
ImmuneResponse 9 points ago +9 / -0

Real talk: are you retarded?

1
Tom94 1 point ago +1 / -0

World economic Forum, klaus swharb the great reset, build back better, every western nation following the plans outlined by the Wef such as crashing their own economy. Multiple World leaders discussing how covid is a great opportunity for reset.

You're either a retard, don't read, or a cunt. Q was speculative. This bullshit has numerous data, papers, ngos, backing it. To the point there are 2/3 papers dry running a covid outbreak and plans that fallow exactly what weve seen.

102
TheOptimist 102 points ago +102 / -0

You just sat through years of the same people pulling off a global fake Russian Collusion Hoax, and you wonder if they have the power to pull off another global hoax?

55
IAbsolutelyDare 55 points ago +55 / -0

And the climate change hoax, and the police brutality hoax, and the trans women of color are being murdered hoax, and the HCQ will kill you hoax, etc etc etc.

28
LurkieLou 28 points ago +28 / -0

'Trans women of color' being murdered is the only one that isn't a hoax. Why are they being murdered? Because they are sex workers who don't disclose that they have a penis. Who is murdering them? Other 'POC' when they find out they hooked up with another man.

6
Serulin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Told so often they "pass" that when they find the dude they like, he knows right away and leaves. All to simulate the experience of a real woman.

1
BigDickTurner 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is still a hoax, in that they arent being murdered more than average.

20
GA_Logic 20 points ago +20 / -0

The war on fats and proteins while promoting excess carbs as part of a balanced diet.

11
BillionsAndBillions 11 points ago +12 / -1

They should update the food pyramid with a new base layer labeled "corn syrup."

5
peterstrzoked 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah, it’s gotta be that high fructose corn syrup or you’ve lost me.

How high do I want my fructose, you ask? FentanylFloyd.jpg

57
spaceforce_maganaut 57 points ago +57 / -0

What does Dilbert have to do with anything. What a tool.

29
hoppy-kangaroos 29 points ago +29 / -0

It's what the left does to claim authority. They say stupid things and justify them by using their status. status > logic and reason. You're wrong because you are a no name pleb.

6
peterstrzoked 6 points ago +6 / -0

My dipshit ex-father-in-law used to pull shit like that. He was watching CNBC one time and the guy was talking about how Bitcoin was a scam, and it was never going to amount to anything, and that if you bought one for $200 that was like flushing $200 down the toilet.

When I pointed out how stupid and arbitrary that was, dipshit was like “well he’s on tv and makes millions of dollars and you don’t, so he must be right and you must be wrong”

Yeah - who’s laughing now dipshit?

3
Salt_n_Pepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope your ex-wife didn't get any of your crypto

1
peterstrzoked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, she was too dumb for any of that. She did steal all of my shit - guns, my car, other miscellaneous valuables. Basically anything she could get her grubby little hands on while I was out of town on a work trip. She also got a free education that I financed.

But you know why? We never had any kids. THANK GOD.

I got off easy/cheap.

Spez: and she spent like 20 grand on an attorney to steal like 15 grand worth of shit total. Probably half that when you consider that she undoubtedly got less for it when she hocked it.

2
Salt_n_Pepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hehe glad she didn't get much fren

16
monkadelic 16 points ago +16 / -0

The whole theme of Dilbert is how incompetent corporations are. So hes saying doesn't think there is a global corporate conspiracy.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
9
GreatestAmericanHero 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's his only claim to credibility. If he could only understand that a bit of humility can be quite endearing however he is too busy huffing the rosiness of his own farts.

8
IAbsolutelyDare 8 points ago +8 / -0

He also took an NLP course in 1998! No one else has ever ascended such dizzying cognitive heights.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of Dilbert’s core themes is that most authority (governmental, corporate, etc.) is dumb. Part of it is valid points/jokes about stupid regulations, part of it is “I’m smarter than society” ego-stroking.

Scott isn’t dumb. He sees through a lot of things. But he’s the kind of guy that’s a bit more perceptive/intelligent than average, and thinks he’s MUCH smarter/perceptive than average. He basically thinks he’s too smart to be tricked or be wrong, which, of course, makes him much easier to trick.

If you pay attention to his stuff—and I have read and enjoyed a lot of Dilbert—you’ll notice that theme that I mentioned; that part of every joke is good satire about dumb things big organizations do, and part of it is self-satisfaction about how he’s smarter than that. So, saying “I made Dilbert” is just another example of that. On one level, he’s making a joke about how he very publicly, very obviously, does not think that corporations or government would be competent enough to conspire like this. On the other level, he’s saying “look how smart I am!”

It’s just how he works.

44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
7
MoonLevelStop 7 points ago +7 / -0

Missing the point.

Satire is funny because it is honest; it needs a sliver of truth to it or else it falls flat. Dilbert is a satire of corporate existence.

He is claiming "I have taken the pulse of office life thoroughly enough to successfully parody it for decades"

For example, Dilbert's short and notoriously lazy friend Wally is based on someone he actually knew at one point. It was made clear that the guy was arbitrarily not going to be promoted any further (IIRC it was the early days of Affirmative Action) so he basically decided to be as unproductive as possible without getting fired.

He does't believe Dibert's company could pull off a grand conspiracy, and every company has shades of Dilbert's existence in it. Though I think he needs to review what he was saying back in 2015 about the propagandistic power of Big Tech. Big Pharma doesn't need to pull the wool over your eyes, they just need to convince the right people in Silicon Valley.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
MoonLevelStop 2 points ago +3 / -1

Meh, a writer/cartoonist/artist can't please everybody all the time. Enough people found it good enough to keep it widely syndicated for a very long time.

4
SeizureSuitLarry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, there are some decent stuff in there, but now I'm wanting to throw my copies to the woodchipper..

31
chelthing 31 points ago +31 / -0

OK, CLOTT ADAMS

12
4
chelthing 4 points ago +4 / -0

🤣👌

3
duMotier 3 points ago +3 / -0

Copium with Clot Adams

Now that's a kill shot

3
MeinDonald 3 points ago +4 / -1

I refuse to take any advice from Scott Adams. A guy that looks worse than a chemo patient

18
Brandon 18 points ago +18 / -0

There are two types of skepitcism; Objective Skepticism and Cynical Skepticism. He's got them reversed, either his cognitive dissidence is that bad, or he's been bought/blackmailed/otherwise owned.

It was"detected" as soon as the media was sicced on that French doc, Dr. Zelenco et al. It was blocked because it might have worked, found out it did work and kept it down, to keep EUA active.

This isn't the only evidence of big pharma being competent in conspiring.

9
that_sound 9 points ago +9 / -0

"This isn't the only evidence of big pharma being competent in conspiring."

How long did "These opioids are safe and nonaddictive" go on?

Decades. Massive deaths. Huge conspiracy - everyone was in on it - manufacturers, FDA, media, doctors, nurses...

6
Brandon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Makes you wonder what brand of cigarettes Scott's mom was prescribed when he was gestating.

5
IAbsolutelyDare 5 points ago +5 / -0

Camels are the safe ones, my doctor said so:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gCMzjJjuxQI

3
ATK69 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right. It’s because we live in an amoral society now. We know our politicians are bought and paid for, they’re super cheap whores on top of that. Doctors? You’re saying doctors, scientists, and pharmacists wouldn’t look the other way for some extra coin? Gtfo!

4
5
Brandon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nuremberg 2.0

Thanks, saved.

3
monkadelic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I forgot about the lady who killed her husband with fish tank cleaner then blamed trump and HCQ.

2
rockytrumpoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everybody who keeps a "save for later" folder needs the linked image.

2
Quixotic 2 points ago +2 / -0

dissonance not dissidence

12
DeadOverRed 12 points ago +12 / -0

"I created Dilbert" could be interpreted as "I can barely draw stick figures, so you're probably right."

12
cyberrigger 12 points ago +12 / -0

I believe they control the legacy media and ban accounts.

4
MagicBanana [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are part of the cabal that does.

10
Rucktoe 10 points ago +10 / -0

This dipshit is odd AF.

I was a lesser skeptic for a good number of years. Then .gov used the IRS to persecute political opponents. Then they spied on reporters. Then they spied on political opponents. Then they used a foreign agent to lie about a President and try to remove him from office with that lie when they knew it was a lie.

At that point I realized I was no longer a lesser skeptic because the greater skeptics were indeed correct.

Sure, it still seems weird these things are actually happening, but they are.

9
BOBON0101 9 points ago +10 / -1

HE'S BEEN A CONSISTENT DUMB PRICK 👎

8
MagicBanana [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

And it's not global, some places haven't been completely infected.

8
jdog 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well the same people that own Pfizer own the CDC and Twitter for that matter, so yeah.

8
DroolBuckets 8 points ago +8 / -0

What an idiot. Here is my response to him:

I knew in January of 2020 that Bill Gates had funded a wargame of "a novel coronavirus" 3 months earlier. Shortly after that I learned about the health minister of France banning HCQ, which had been OTC for 40 years. Then I learned that her husband was at the opening ceremony of the Wuhan P4 biolab. Shortly after that, I learned of the US coronavirus research in Wuhan. After 4 years of Russiagate, when ZeroHedge was kicked off of Twitter for the lab-leak theory, it became obvious that it was a fucking plandemic. When they came out saying that they were going to vaccinate everyone regardless of whether they have already had the virus, I knew that the vaccine was part of the plan.

You knew how to watch television. You think everyone gets all of their information from the TV.

It wasn't a fucking guess, you asshat. Stop assuming what other people believe.

8
White_Devil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Arrogantly asleep.

Plus that face gets more punchable every single time I see it

7
Areyoukidding15 7 points ago +7 / -0

He wrote a book called Dilbert and the way of the weasel. It was incredibly based. It came out back in like 1999. If you had listened to that advice, you would be a beast right now. Regardless of his current status, he remains respected for being able to combine humor and actionable advice with amazing insight to the human condition.

Young scott adams would be greatly disappointed in old scott adams.

7
Tenspot20 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ivermectin saves lives!

6
daty_dato 6 points ago +6 / -0

Global? Aren't dozens of other countries giving it out like candy?

He's a moron. He can't see that the people in power, it only has to be a handful of people, dictate the policies of the medical community? They threaten everyone that doesn't tow the line with loss of license/job.

5
Libertas_Vel_Mors 5 points ago +5 / -0

So... strawman arguments now?

Who the fuck is seriously propounding that Big Pharma did all of this just to shut down sales of Ivermectin?

Now if he said "...conspiracy to take advantage of a small crisis to rake in massive profits while governments leverage it all to gain more control over the masses" ? Then yeah - most sane people think similarly (though this pop-up conspiracy also happens to be true).

4
FudgyFudgeBots 4 points ago +4 / -0

Spoken like a true big pharma employee.

4
InternationalSpy007 4 points ago +4 / -0

"without detection"?

What?

Everyone knows. They have been "detected".

3
27Sandino 3 points ago +3 / -0

a buddy of mind said that it can't be a conspiracy theory because too many people figured it out

in other words, "i dont believe this conspiracy because too many people believe this conpiracy"

this retard just reminded me of this "argument"

3
TGNX 3 points ago +3 / -0

We noticed this a year and a half ago.

3
Crappydatum 3 points ago +3 / -0

The FDA "shut down" Ivermectin.

Of course they're bought and paid for by Big Pharma, so there's that

3
RPchill1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This faggots needs to STFU and get back to doodling his funnies.

3
jiminycricket1941 3 points ago +3 / -0

This guys faggot energy might have surpassed Bill Mitchell. I’m not sure and I believe there will have to be a vote, but boy, this guy is sure making a run for biggest fag in the universe.

3
ChuckedIntoAVan 3 points ago +3 / -0

He draws cartoons that mock corporate cubicle life, so he is obviously an authority on pharmaceutical and government control over medicine. Got it. I guess the FDA intercepting mail, families having to go to court to get IVM for dying loved ones, and pharmacies refusing to dispense a legally prescribed medication that has been approved for over 50 years is just us being silly. They’ve never tried to hide it. This tool needs to stfu and detox from all the copium. Nobody cares what you think, Clott.

3
DeportAntifa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pfizer>FDA>major corporate hospital management>doctors. It’s a simple chain of ownership and marching orders.

Doctors won’t prescribe the shit. I begged them to give it to my dad and they wouldn’t, and he fucking died on a ventilator.

FUCK YOU Scott Adams, you fucking dipshit. Go get an IVM prescription. Go get a prescription for an incredibly safe, widely-prescribed, Nobel Prize-winning drug. Go get one. I’ll wait. Fucking cocksucker

3
frogface 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am amazed at his sense of self importance.

3
LeftistJabroni 3 points ago +3 / -0

I created Dilbert. lol

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
LordScatmanJohn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh they didn't shut down use of Ivermectin?

Tell you what, take the Scott Adams challenge. Go and try to get some Ivermectin. Horse grade doesn't count for this challenge, you gotta get the stuff made for people.

Report back tomorrow and tell us how easy it was to get. Fucker.

3
Jaunty_Haul 3 points ago +3 / -0

He thinks the conspiracy against Ivermectin is undetected.

Just because he doesn't see the evidence, he thinks it doesn't exist.

What a buffoon.

3
Reclaimer69 3 points ago +3 / -0

He is giving off Neil D Tyson vibes more and more.

BTW

I invented critical thinking. I own the patent and everytime you think critically I am legally owed 1 dollar.

3
Walt_Kowalski 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, it was a leaky global conspiracy.

3
Serulin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the sellers from india called and said some of their packages were being seized, and they have honestly no reason to care after something is sent, they have done their part.

2
FrankWisner 2 points ago +2 / -0

This dude can't quit losing.

2
Americanapplepie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok ClotAdams, who has to “detect” it for it to be validated for you, exactly? “Detected” by the ones perpetrating it? Or “detected” by normie NPCs like you? And remember, you can’t be accidentally correct or it doesn’t count! 😬

2
crazyjackel 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue is with information suppression by platforms that are used for spreading information is that your view of reality becomes distorted.

It is why you have to both go into the deep unknowns of the Internet for some information and also look at the common pages. All of this to get an accurate view of reality. And even so, your reality is left to that which is on the Internet, which is little in comparison to the total knowledge that exists.

That is why Ivermectin is being suppressed as a drug treatment. It is being held to a higher standard as a drug than the vaccines when it has potential (when properly administered) to save even more than such.

2
crazyjackel 2 points ago +2 / -0

One other thing people miss when it comes to a global conspiracy is that you don’t need as many people as you think. You need a team of good PR people who can coordinate on the media and a group of other people who can work on the backend for the odd jobs.

Think about the stock market and analysts who push out certain companies that years later lose 70% of their value. All that is required to do a scheme is to have analysts project and push (with a smudge of truth) and then have someone buy and sell early on the flip side. It is a conspiracy that is easy to pull off.

It is why the concept of “the harder someone tries to sell something to you, the worse it is for you” is standardly true.

1
IAbsolutelyDare 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also the insight from public choice economics that the small group who reaps concentrated benefits has much incentive to craft such a hoax, while the large group who faces dispersed costs has no incentive to do deep research, and will choose to remain "rationally ignorant".

2
BidensWetNurse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can everyone please stop posting this fucker's brainlet and shitly cryptic twats, ffs. He's a shite version of Dim Fool.

2
Winged_Splinter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm beginning to think that Hillary Clinton took his class on how to be a sore loser.

2
Tailgunnerjoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ivermectin hasn’t been shut down globally. Japan, South Africa use it.

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

And India, to great effect

2
SPEDMan64 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just because a few countries are using it does not negate the fact that the majority of countries globally have blocked its usage.

2
Justaguy147 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is Scott Adams the new Bill Mitchell?

2
3dandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

A conspiracy to shut down the substance they produce? Big pharma makes the drugs to sell them and he's to stupid to realize they can stop making them. If it wasn't plot to kill people then we wouldn't have to order shadow packs from India. No wonder I never laughed at Dilbert, I always thought who writes this stupid shit. Dilbert is shit compared to a cat the color of Trump who's punchline is lasagna.

2
RandyMarsh420 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dum dum dum weak beta bald faggot

2
Faulkner 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can pull off the Covid scam as a whole, but they can’t pull off an ancillary part of the same scam?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
LoobintheToobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Matthew 15:13-14 (NLT) 13 Jesus replied, “Every plant not planted by my heavenly Father will be uprooted, 14 so ignore them. They are blind guides leading the blind, and if one blind person guides another, they will both fall into a ditch.”

Isaiah 44:25 (NLT) I expose the false prophets as liars and make fools of fortune-tellers. I cause the wise to give bad advice, thus proving them to be fools.

2
Sidneyswarmsnatch76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except...it has been detected dumbass.

2
NeverNotTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

LISTEN TO ME, YOU FOOLS! I CREATED DILBERT!!!!

1
Realassman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we now certify him a faggot ?

1
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 1 point ago +1 / -0

Narcissism is a hell of a drug. His superiority complex is forcing him to triple-down on stupid.