2292
Washington State Democrats Push Ban on 51 Specific Firearms (www.breitbart.com)  shall not be infringed 
posted ago by libman ago by libman +2294 / -2
Comments (212)
sorted by:
160
Winter_Is_Coming2020 160 points ago +161 / -1

WA so much wants to be like CA

179
libman [S] 179 points ago +179 / -0

We need county level secession.

Washington and Oregon are red states with urban shit-holes fucking them up.

98
zillat 98 points ago +100 / -2

We need to isolate these cities and starve their citizens out of the country.

52
frogface 52 points ago +52 / -0

Fix the voting and you fix the country.

30
Triple_Jabrony 30 points ago +30 / -0

Even if it worked youre still voting for criminals and also a lot of the people in charged of destroying the country are law makers and corporations that we dont get to vote for. We need a complete cleansing like the one Sodom and Gommora got.

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

As long as there are ahem coastal liberal elites like Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein, America can't be fixed

28
RedBlooded 28 points ago +29 / -1

why?? so they can just move to red areas and fuck those places up too??

6
NooneFor2024 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its exactly what it happening here in South Dakota. They have started with Rapid City and Sioux Falls first and are slowly moving into the smaller surrounding communities.

-7
zillat -7 points ago +5 / -12

I meant out of our country. We should treat them as we treat the unvaccinated.

4
PartandParcel 4 points ago +6 / -2

My pure blood ass is treated quite well wherever I go fag boy.

-1
zillat -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think you are misreading my statement, and should retract the fag boy statement against a fellow fren...

3
bratt 3 points ago +4 / -1

*as they treat the unvaccinated

2
PartandParcel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Retracted. Sorry fren.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +4 / -1

What do you mean we?

3
Chopblock 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do we mean “you”?!!

2
zillat 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dumbass, I am pureblood too. I want them out of the country and them to be treated as they are treating unvaccinated across the country.

4
UnitedStatesofSmash 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why bother with all the wait? Firebombing them all to death would be quicker.

2
OneFatDog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cascadia subduction quake.

38
Iteachfuckingscience 38 points ago +38 / -0

THIS

Have you ever visited the State of Jefferson? It’s amazing!

County by county, the new states of the Great Republic will unite!

Dems run cities. And it’s only because of the universities inside them. That’s it. RINOs run states. Get them out.

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +12 / -1

And it’s only because of the universities inside them"

Too many exceptions for this to be a rule. L.A. is a sh*thole, but it has little to do with UCLA or USC.

Same with Portland. UoPortland and Portland State are hardly the source of the lunacy.

12
resoluteAction 12 points ago +12 / -0

The population of our cities is over 50% illegal aliens and new immigrants/refugees from 3rd world countries. They aren't voting dem but when someone steals their vote they don't complain because of their welfare bribes. These groups are managed by the teachers and postal unions.

10
LawlAndDisorder 10 points ago +10 / -0

Portland has been gobbling up the worst of them from Washington and California for years. Now look at what such concentrations of absolute retard can do. They don’t even have the sense to not burn down their own home.

I’ve noticed a lot of them are showing up back in Washington. They didn’t do it right the first time. Time to try again.

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

I do find it promising how the non-Seattle/Portland parts of those States are showing some balls. I've got a lot of friends still in the Portland suburbs and they're finally figuring out how to fight back.

I don't have high hopes for any changes in the near future. The commies have their blood funnels rammed pretty deep.

6
SeawolfEmeralds 6 points ago +6 / -0

3 Counties Officially Initiate Secession; 7 Counties in Oregon Vote to Join Idaho | Facts Matter

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tXi05s50y7A

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

We are following this closely here in CA. The New California bunch in NorCal have been rattling cages for awhile.

I wish them all luck.

5
Libertardian 5 points ago +5 / -0

On the contrary, these schools are cesspools of lunacy where young skulls full of mush are indoctrinated and hypnotized. Same with schools K-12.

2
MudDog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whatever happened to State of Lincoln

0
Cantshadowbanthemall 0 points ago +1 / -1

The state of Jefferson nets +2 dem senators

12
buckiemohawk 12 points ago +12 / -0

changed the voting laws and ever since its been Demonrat controlled

8
Pepega 8 points ago +8 / -0

welcome to Illinois and a bunch of other states haha

6
CNNdotWin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or maybe we need county level INVASION.

44
Pumpitinurbutt 44 points ago +49 / -5

Fuck inslee and those faggot dems

43
Winter_Is_Coming2020 43 points ago +43 / -0

Talked to a Ex coworker who lives in West Seattle; self described “non conservative”, voted for Trump, said all his friends did too, thinks Inslee lost, Trump won, and state was stolen

33
libman [S] 33 points ago +33 / -0

A significant fraction of Trump supporters are not social conservatives.

I'm a libertarian. Trump is the first Republican POTUS I voted for (not counting Ron Paul in the primaries).

It's communists vs anti-communists, period.

24
TastyTreats 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's communists vs anti-communists, period.

Well put

9
unicornpoop 9 points ago +9 / -0

Freedom vs authoritarianism.

32
The_Litehaus_Abides 32 points ago +32 / -0

That's what happens with universal mail-in ballots. Oregon too. I'd be willing to bet Trump also won California.

Anyway, once they make voting mail-in only for a whole state, that state is lost to the commies.

WA state also wants to make "lying" about election results a crime. In other words, when they "win" through obvious fraud, you won't be allowed to question it.

26
LibertySmiberty 26 points ago +26 / -0

Culp won, no doubt in my mind.

17
Seatacjoe 17 points ago +17 / -0

WE never voted for SOund transit train at the initial cost of 30K a person, then 50K a person...fuck me I dont even want to know what the overrun is now. ANd fuck our legislature for hb1068 where us plebs can never look into election material....you know to protect the sanctity of the elections. Fuckin scummy fucks. Hell yeah they want laws agains guns becuase they want us to be like Australia. They are going to get a lot of people hurt and they could give two shits about the trans social worker coming to your house to impose tyranny and that thing gets a one way ticket to hell.

13
buckiemohawk 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump had Reagan 84 numbers. so yeah it was stolen, He won most states save a few very liberal states

3
trump4045 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's a nice thought. If they think harder 2020 will be investigated and the globalists defeated.

7
Seatacjoe 7 points ago +7 / -0

one faggot didnt like what you said. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE on fucktard bitch FUCK INSLEE THE COMMIE FAG!

15
FinkleisEinhorn 15 points ago +15 / -0

All coastal cities are AIDS. Eastern Washington needs to be it's own state

6
praise_lord_kek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Make sure to always stop in Ellensburg to take a piss.

7
TastyTreats 7 points ago +7 / -0

Which is retarded, because if you "follow the science", you'd see that California with all of it's failed policies has almost double the homicide rate of Washington.

What they are doing is not working. Why would you then want to emulate a failing state?

8
unicornpoop 8 points ago +8 / -0

The model driving big cities now: Drive out all working class. City is mostly welfare and bankrupt. Rake in even more federal "aid" funds to split amongst yourselves. Stay in power unopposed forever.

Cities have incentive to go bankrupt because they just get even more fed money. If we would allow bankrupt cities to die, we wouldn't have this problem.

4
ShrikeDeCil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because they don't give a shit about any of that.

The metrics they are interested in are things like "Average wealth of politicians" and "Percent increase in value of luxury homes" and "Value of a skyscraper".

Homicide rate? Wake up. They have zero fucks for that.

6
IAmCovfefe 6 points ago +6 / -0

And Oregon.

77
Dylan_da_Spider 77 points ago +78 / -1

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

45
nakizo 45 points ago +45 / -0

Washington State Constitution Article 1, Section 24 “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired"

23
rentfREEEE_since2016 23 points ago +23 / -0

Should have read. “No government body or related entity shall pass any law regarding firearms. Any attempt to pass such law or to regulate or to ban or to circumvent this article shall be considered immediately null and void, and shall be considered legal standing for removal from office by any citizen of the state”

16
Retard_Strength 16 points ago +16 / -0

replace 'removal from office' with 'execution' and that would sharpen politicians' minds real fast

3
rentfREEEE_since2016 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are not incorrect sir!

8
Wanderlust 8 points ago +8 / -0

"The only laws the state may pass regarding guns are those making it cheaper and easier to own guns."

8
praise_lord_kek 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Every 6 months, a new firearm must be acquired, and added to the growing number in every man's closet safe. Failure to do so will result in accusations of faggotry."

1
MickMoss1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Between the 2nd and Marbury v Madison, everything before the last comma is already the law of the land. The faggot communists just don't care.

1
D29011 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does.

2
geckogreen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think it matters. The state supreme court is a bunch of lefties

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
50
2SmoothGQ 50 points ago +50 / -0

So basically “AR-15 is scary”. These people need to get a fucking life.

25
Business-Socks 25 points ago +25 / -0

That nosey democrat who calls the cops when you load your AR into your car to go to the range?

They wouldn't bat an eye at a Mini-14.

  • Same caliber.

  • Same capacity.

  • Same rate of fire.

But it's not black and scary with the thing that flips up ...

10
Chickenbaconpoutine 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mini 14 is my go-to example.

https://www.sportsmansoutdoorsuperstore.com/prodimages/alt_images/mini14-police-2.jpg

It's 4x the same firearm.

But 2 of them look scawy, so better call the cops.

3
SuperDuty4x4 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's a great example of why this proposed law is stupid too. Only the 2nd one would be legal, the rest violate the detachable mag + something in their list of bad things.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
Snowmexican 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lol don't underestimate the chromosome levels of a liberal. In Canada they inadvertently banned a website on their list of banned firearms because it shared a name with a variant.

1
D29011 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can totally make a mini-14 look scary.

1
Weloveflyovercountry 1 point ago +1 / -0

good point.. i bet same applies to a mini 30

13
destroyer713 13 points ago +13 / -0

The Washington State legal definition of assault weapon includes any semi-auto long gun. Your Ruger 10/22 is an assault weapon according to Olympia.

10
2SmoothGQ 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wow. I’m not a Washington pede I live in a free state but damn. They really don’t know shit about firearms.

11
destroyer713 11 points ago +11 / -0

It got really bad really fast. Ironically the slide started after the state went all mail-in voting. I-1594 was the fun one in Washington State for gun rights. The local sheriff's offices do the background checks on pistol purchases or "Semi-automatic assault rifles" now and can take up to 45 days to complete.

The state is also working towards a non-decentralized background check where WSP does the checks instead of the sheriff's offices.

https://www.dol.wa.gov/business/firearms/docs/WSP-firearms-background-checks-update.pdf

1
2SmoothGQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are they with semi-auto shotguns out of curiosity?

2
destroyer713 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think those still go through NICS, until the WSP takeover of background checks.

3
sibko_reject 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wrong, Washington state has not defined the bullshit term "assault WEAPON".

What Washington did do was even more bullshit with Initiative 1639. Created a term "Semiautomatic Assault Rifle" which is defined as any semiautomatic rifle. They have bridged the gap and now call every autoloading rifle an "assault RIFLE".

4
GainesvilleFlorida 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe we're going about it all wrong.

I think we need to go major woke and push for California to ban all images of weapons produced by any media/hollywood.

They shouldn't be allowed to both produce action movies with good guys trained and shooting all weapon forms while banning those weapons.

27
TheSaltyVet 27 points ago +27 / -0

I thought a part of oregon was gonna make Greater Idaho?

24
Sek7or 24 points ago +24 / -0

It’s passing and working it’s way through the counties

12
TheSaltyVet 12 points ago +12 / -0

God speed.

3
2ASingleIssueVoter 3 points ago +4 / -1

It can't be done without US congress green lighting it. Chances of that all VERY low.

7
1n5aN3 7 points ago +7 / -0

I thought congress didn’t have to be involved if it was only moving lines, and not making new states?

Though I know Oregon would have to vote and allow it as well, which I highly doubt they would allow…..

-1
RIPIsaacKappy -1 points ago +1 / -2

Idaho too. We're good, thanks.

2
1n5aN3 2 points ago +2 / -0

The polls I saw a couple years ago seemed to indicate Idaho would probably vote in favor of it if the time came.

If I was in Idaho, I would probably vote in favor, depending on details; Eastern Oregon is pretty conservative…..

0
PROBE 0 points ago +0 / -0

You can't stop the coming of the Greater Idaho Empire.

27
xdrunkagainx 27 points ago +27 / -0

It's cute they think this will keep the people from killing them

9
Kramit 9 points ago +9 / -0

Be Ungovernable

25
rentfREEEE_since2016 25 points ago +25 / -0

Only 51??? Reading that article it I can’t think of a firearm that WOUDLNT be banned. They want to ban fucking RIMFIRES for shits sake.

17
bluto36 17 points ago +17 / -0

the list of guns to ban matches my collection of guns

fuck off washington! i hate the people running my state, and i blame fucktarded king county

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
ParticleCannon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I sense a connection...

16
Johnnyboy2324 16 points ago +16 / -0

Inslee just sucks the farts of California and New York. Did you guys know this fag ran for president in 2016? I didn’t find out until he dropped from the race and I live in Washington state. Whatever Cali or New York does he tries to copy, now he’s trying to one up them. You can’t go anywhere in Washington without seeing FUCK INSLEE stickers on cars. We didn’t vote for the cuck ass faggot, they called the governor race at 11% votes counted. No joke. We did not vote for this guy. Washington state has had mail in voting for decades, they’ve been stealing the elections here for at least 30 years that I know of. You wanna see corruption in politics come to Olympia.

9
Ctor 9 points ago +9 / -0

Rossi vs fraudoire comes to mind...

4
RPchill1 4 points ago +4 / -0

X1000. DoMiNiOn says red Clark County wanted Killary in 2016. And that traitor bitch Herrera-Buetler will never lose again since the deal she made with the devil in 2020. It's all evil and corrupt.

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
sentient-potato 9 points ago +9 / -0

they're worried about criminals sneaking around with shorter rifles. so they want to pass a law which no criminal would adhere to anyway.

because the woke have zero critical thinking skills.

7
SaddleTramp 7 points ago +8 / -1

It's not about criminals its about disarming dissidents.

1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was my point.

5
unicornpoop 5 points ago +5 / -0

They don't give fuck all about criminals. This is about setting precedent and taking away legal firearms bit by bit, because legal gun owners pose them threat, not jamal in the ghetto. Jamal can be easily controlled by closing liquor stores and mcdonalds. They aren't stupid.

1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +1 / -0

that was my point.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
thisguy883 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone should tell these dumb asses when you make the rifle barrel longer you make it more accurate and deadly due to the increased velocity

No I don't think I will.

3
libman [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You also increase the chance of a bullet going right through someone and killing the person behind them.

Solution: exploding bullets. 💀

14
14
libman [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'll go make sure the metal 3D printer in my basement isn't printing those firearms as we speak...

12
goat_nebula 12 points ago +12 / -0

Such dumb legislation too. Playing whack-a-mole.

Just make a “new” gun model with a different name. Legislation bypassed. Dumb shit Dems never think past their next soy latte.

EDIT: Do you all think they’re lazy or just that dumb and incompetent? I struggle deciding which it is.

4
ParticleCannon 4 points ago +4 / -0

They intentionally made the language vague to strike down "copycats", which with their creative interpretation will eventually cover crossbows and spitball straws.

4
thisguy883 4 points ago +4 / -0

There was a guest on YAH who said he worked on a campaign team for a Democrat in California. He said that when this guy would speak in front of a crowd, he claimed he will propose some obscure gun bill that is not only already on the books, but gun owners would see past the stupidity. When he asked this Democrat if he knew this already, the dude said, "yeah I know, but they dont" while referring to his constituents.

This is why you get stupid regulations like this because all they are looking for is re-election from idiot dem voters.

4
Retard_Strength 4 points ago +4 / -0

it's to get sound bites on the media, so they can be seen as 'doing something!'

11
Huginn 11 points ago +11 / -0

WA has been suprisingly pro gun for a blue state until now. I just can't believe it took this long to do this. I hope to get the fuck out of here sooner rather than later.

7
praise_lord_kek 7 points ago +7 / -0

I had the same thought. Growing up in Snohomish County, I always admired how accommodating the state was to firearms in general. Lawful open carry. Easy to apply for a concealed permit from the sheriff.

Then I moved to AZ. (5 years ago.) I've watched my old state crumble and burn from afar.

11
TastyTreats 11 points ago +11 / -0

These communist-run states are increasing crime in their cities as a pretext to restrict your rights

Shootings in Portland (for instance) went from 350 in 2019 to 1250 in 2021

That's insane. In previous years that would be a national news story. Maybe even a global news story. That would be indicative of a complete breakdown of a lawful society.

A 10% increase in shootings would be a major news story.

This was only leaked because I saw it in another story where the communists were trying to justify their gun restrictions because "Look how bad shootings have gotten!" Not realizing (or caring) that they exposed their own shortcomings.

10
hoppy-kangaroos 10 points ago +10 / -0

Proving once again that Democrats are at war with the Constitution.

7
destroyer713 7 points ago +7 / -0

WA is the first state to legally define an "assault weapon" as any long gun that uses gas from the firing of a round to load another round, so any semi-auto is classified as an assault weapon. I had to sit through a very long class and the 2A lawyer teaching it detailed why it was bad that this was the case, as up to that point there was no legal definition attached to the term.

Now in WA, a Ruger 10/22 is an assault weapon.

All mail-in ballot states are shit, yo.

7
SuperDuty4x4 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not just a ban, it also creates a registry.

(2)(a) A person who lawfully possessed, has a purchase order for, or completed an application to purchase an assault weapon before January 1, 2022, and who has registered the assault weapon with the Washington state patrol may: (i) Continue to possess and transport the assault weapon;

So they grandfather firearms you already own but only if you register them with the WSP.

6
Cucker_Carlson 6 points ago +8 / -2

They're creating their own prison states. Our patriot states will never follow. Leave and let the commies burn it down. They need to hit rock-bottom before those who remain in commie states will have learned the most important lesson of their lives.

6
KrellKrypto 6 points ago +7 / -1

Becuse banning things works so well.

Looking at you war on drugs…..

5
DiscoverAFire 5 points ago +5 / -0

So you're saying that 10 years from now Seattle will have government sponsored shooting sites, where they will provide the materials we need to shoot drugs, i mean shoot guns, safely?

3
Idontevenknow 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is a timeline I can get behind!

6
Hanging_Chad 6 points ago +7 / -1

They're not allowed to ban guns

3
thisguy883 3 points ago +3 / -0

They cant ban guns, but they can ban gun parts; which is what they are doing here.

2
unicornpoop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or make bullets unavailable / unaffordable.

5
GrayManNumber333 5 points ago +5 / -0

If WA had men, they would assemble with all banned weapons for a parade around the capital after the weapons are banned.

5
Palmertabs 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t have any guns anymore, I lost them in a boating accident.

5
wolfsettler 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's an old saying. If you don't use it, you lose it.

5
NewtonsThirdLaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cold dead hands.

5
buckiemohawk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Meanwhile dont go to any of their cities where u will assaulted and robbed

4
FuckU/Spez 4 points ago +4 / -0

California a couple of years ago...

Hold my beer... Bans 1400 types

Now I'm in the Great State of Texas, so fuck-em

4
CommunismIsForFags 4 points ago +4 / -0

Change a few lengths, alter a few barrel twists, move a pin a few mm, give it a new name and bam, completely new gun.

Treat it like pharma patents.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
COLDWARPATRIOT55 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, gun sales just skyrocketed.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
B1ueCo11ar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Specificity means it's insanely easy to get around. Transform the original firearms in any way and. BOOM! sorry Mr government my firearm isn't on your list, see says right here on the side of the barrel "commie Yeet cannon", not on the list.

3
Foomer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Inch by inch they inslave us in our own home, yet we do nothing.

You're letting them take the ONLY thing that can stop you're inslavement.

3
Dystopiaslayer 3 points ago +5 / -2

okay...so sue in the supreme court

3
Alpha_Lemming 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shall not be infringed.

Since California got slapped down by SCOTUS, for this same thing, this effort is blatantly unconstitutional.

There needs to be sanction on the state and legislature if this goes through to becoming law.

3
454evr 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're worried. They know that people might come looking for them after all the damage that's been done to the country. Yes, this is about 'safety': the Uniparty's safety.

3
LibertySmiberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shall not be infringed. Unconstitutional period.

2
Homemade-Soap 2 points ago +2 / -0

All gun laws are unconstitutional

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the attachments they want to ban is Grenade launcher or flare launcher. Seriously, talk about pissing in the dark hoping to hit the toilet.

2
MarsupialHomeRule 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll take my M252A1 81mm mortar attachment with their cold dead hands...

2
680-EVIL 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally illegal. Sue the lawmakers personally.

2
MegoThor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who cares what illegitimate traitor commies say you can and can’t have? Fuck them.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

Criminals use whatever guns they want and don't have to check in with Big Brother, so there are perks being a democrat for certain.

2
BiteMeMarxist 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah, but, the Constitution?

2
Natick_01760 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't read the thing.

Are potato guns on the list?

2
Based_in_Seattle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck these commies in this state. You can take my guns out of my cold dead hands.

2
magamagashii 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why list out all that when you can just say "Only muskets are approved"? Seems quicker to write out and quicker for the Supre court to toss it out.

2
ANatisGrey 2 points ago +2 / -0

It really bums me out how far WA has fallen. We lived there for 5 years. It's gorgeous out there. But we'd never go back now.

2
PartandParcel 2 points ago +2 / -0

DemonKKKrats know criminals don’t obey gun laws. They know most law abiding citizens will. So the commies go soft on crime so crime skyrocketed, so now to “reduce” crime they need to take your guns. Not the criminal’s guns, your guns.

The evil behind the demoKKKrat party has to be something otherworldly. They coddle criminality & degeneracy, punish & detest all that is good.

2
FerkenBlerkin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like they're pushing people to all have 22" barreled rifles, which are better suited for long ranged high velocity shots. That may not have been a very well thought out decision for tyrants to make. Democrats are stupid af. Good luck commies.

2
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 2 points ago +3 / -1

Helicopters cost money and take too long to organize. Just drag these fools in to the street already.

2
coreyworks 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder why they don't legalize all firearms like they did with all drugs?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0