He protected Hunter Biden when the laptop scandal broke. Saying the use to be neighbors or some shit. He absolutely went along with the steal. Damn, short memories or newly redpilled?
No, you dingbat. You've completely missed the point. He said he's always liked Joe Biden, and is close enough to the Biden family they confide in him about Joe's mental health. Tucker has known Joe since he was 22 years old. This would be enough to give anyone with two brain cells to rub together a hint as to what side Tucker is on.
Shout out to Hannity’s surprise book he dropped for big money right before the 2020 election when he already knew what was gonna happen and knew his ratings would tank and he would be hated after with the rest of Fox News. He is corrupt.
Right? I just found this out as well. My gut has always been good to me and it told me not to pay any attention to Hannity. More proof my gut was right.
Yep, Glenn was local in Tampa at the time. His show had modest success in the afternoons. I remember he did a "rally for America" in the middle of the Florida recount where he invited everyone down to the radio station to have a protest and thousands of people showed up in the parking lot. That's when I first heard of him.
Then on 9/11 (literally that morning I think) he suddenly wasn't just local anymore, he got put on nationwide and they preempted local programming on all their stations. I turned on the radio, and there he was. If I recall correctly, after 9/11 is when Clear Channel decided to leave him on nationally, and that's still the same show he has now. I'm not saying that means anything, but I always thought that was a little odd.
Thanks to Obama modifying the Smith Mundt act, every bit of media is fucking propagandized. It’s either controlled opposition or straight up propaganda like CNN. Fuck all of them.
oBaMa is just a puppet controlled by the same masters as that war criminal BUSH and his glowie daddy who was also the VP to Ronald Raygun. All high profile Republicans are swamp.
This is a tough pill for normies to swallow. Including my parents unfortunately. They just can't comprehend that Fox News could be controlled messaging.
I love how "CIA" just means you're a degenerate who's friends with the central bankers.
I remember when we thought the CIA was into spying on foreign enemies and investigating aliens. In reality, it's just a pathetic clique of drug dealers, bounty hunters, pedos, and murderers.
I'm also pretty sure they've been fucking with us with all the hysteria surrounding UFOs. It's probably just a psyop to make us think the Cabal has otherworldly friends, so we fear rebelling against it.
meh. evil gets you awesome tech, but then you and your evil friends kill eachother over who gets to control it and progress stunts itself while the good guys play catch up.
reason 151 popular science fiction is bullshit.
klingons would have never made it to space. palpatine wouldve been assassinated by an imperial dignitary in the most pussy way possible.
I’m suspecting that each big player in the controlled opposition gets to report openly on a few chosen subjects, and none of them are allowed the same set. Conversely, they may only push the fake news narratives on a few selected topics, or when specifically directed. This way, a variety of the media figures seem reasonable most of the time, and they are excused for infrequent lapses. For example, Tucker shitting the bed rather than following thru with the Hunter Biden laptop story. Also, Mark Levine condemning Derek Chauvin and saying justice was served.
Except he did follow through, had bobalinsky on, showed the reciepts, and got LITERALLY nowhere with it. No one else picked it up, no agencies asked about it, and nothing came of it.
The Biden campaign didn't even acknowledge it.
So what do you do? Keep repeating it to the very people that already know its true, or gather up other stories and information to make sure your viewers continue to be informed?
Bobalinsky was a separate story. Of course you are right that it fizzled because it was ignored / hidden. But the laptop story was much bigger - it’s what we all became aware of here, but none of the normies heard about it when it mattered most. That’s the one national poles found that ~10% of Biden voter would have switched their vote or sat it out if they knew about it in advance. Not saying they wouldn’t have just stolen harder to compensate, but I am saying that Tucker went full cucker. He literally opened the big show claiming that he changed his mind about it because he went to high school with Hunter and he felt bad for the guy struggling with drug addiction.
I seem to recall that Biden's entire laptop was dumped on this website and you could read anything you wanted on it. Is it still available on any site.
Jack Maxey, formerly co-host of Bannon's War Room, posted the entire contents of the laptop on Twitter (minus photos and videos because some of that is likely CP). No idea if it's still up.
Due to the manipulation and coercion of said few for decades. I hope God will grant mercy for such psychological warfare that the majority of the populace didn’t know was occurring. What chance did children have? At least I hope God buys that argument. :/
Beautifully put. I use a similar analogy for rinos. They take turns who has to throw a nay in the box and piss of their voters. It seems obvious to me.
Judging by how he treated the election steal, I'm operating under the assumption that he had special infiltration orders which allows for the covering if certain nono topics. Until proven otherwise.
Tucker didn't really do anything wrong with the election steal, though.
You have to remember that even though WE KNOW the election was stolen, tucker is a journalist and has to have evidence to prove it before he can say it.
If you recall, everyone freaked out about tucker because he ran a video about how America is still the greatest country.....
Why did we freak out about that? He's not wrong, and it appeared he was as stunned about the election as anyone, and used his position to try and calm people a bit.
In the end, I have no idea who's a good guy or a bad guy, but I do know that our side is just as prone to hyperbolic overreaction as their side.
Cowardice is no excuse, but people do need to remember that he is a journalist, and has to watch his claims very carefully. If he was the only one talking about it, and could not back up the claims, he could easily be sued into oblivion. I do understand not wanting to sacrifice your platform, if others are not coming with the receipts. Some of the blame rests on Trumps legal team for not presenting the evidence (and there was/is mountains) in a way that was not refutable. I understand that they were up against the entire media apparatus, the courts, and the DOJ, but they also made a lot of slip ups and were not focused. They allowed so many theories and arguments to get into the ether, that it was hard to tell what the actual case was.
That being said, anyone that does not believe there was election fraud at his level, is a liar (for whatever reason).
There were mountains of evidence already on November 4th and I don't buy that he didn't know about any of it. He kept his mouth shut and shut down any attempt at discussion just like everybody else did, and likely for the same reasons. Best case: fear of losing his job and credibility. Not good enough for me.
covering them how? im sorry but sitting on pins and needles hoping tucker will cover an issue we already know more about isnt my idea of being well informed. everything he says and does is an affectation. that always bothered me. now we know why. the ONLY reason he covers any issue is so that conservatives will not go elsewhere and globo homos can control what his audience hears. Tucker is poison of the worst kind.
It's called controlled opposition. Tucker will say many true things, but in it is sprinkled a bunch of bullshit and at any point his handlers want him to roll over he will. Broken clock is right twice a day.
She textes what seem like dismissive platitudes. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just simply stringing Hannity, who is and has always been an annoying douche, along.
I always keep an open tab on people but try to give them the benefit of the doubt, so even though her replies seemed treacherous, there is a chance that she was just playing along and "agreeing" to stay on the inside track with the treasonous swine like Hannity.
Am I wrong to like Tucker? Some of the stories of his that I’ve been watching recently are absolutely devastating to the Dems/Neocons, and I just can’t fathom how he could be controlled opposition or something.
His reporting seems decidedly good-for-us (i.e. truthful), and doesn’t pull punches—at least compared to what I know/expect him to be reporting on, from other sources like here. If he were compromised, I can’t see a perspective from which the DS would think it wise instruct him to carry on doing what he does—as opposed to just not reporting the way he does.
I guess it must say something about Fox, that they seemingly allow him to report whatever he wants. Is it because he’s too popular and successful to get rid of, and the boat for doing so sailed years ago? Or is there something deeper and more nefarious going on? I’m really curious to see what others think about this, because I seldom see it come up, and he’s rarely mentioned in threads like this—good, bad, or otherwise.
Hannity to Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan: “Guys, we have a clear path to land the plane in 9 days. He can’t mention the election again. Ever. I did not have a good call with him today. And worse, I’m not sure what is left to do or say, and I don’t like knowing if it’s truly understood. Ideas?”
Granted, its easy to take shit out of context and create the narrative you want. This isn't a good look. But if one considered it thru this lens - this could have been Pence's conditions to not 25th him out. Which would change the context considerably. And, considering they conveniently left the rest of the "plan" out, leads me to believe that this was done to leave everyone with the impression they are narrating and not what was actually said.
Let's not forget how hard that snake Pelosi was scheming, even with the military heads. I wouldn't be one bit surprised to learn that she was trying to convince The Joint Chiefs of Staff to LITERALLY go to the White House and put cuffs on GEOTUS.
I can also see how Hannity either knew or knew enough to fear that the dems and establishment wanted to take Trump down hard in the last few days. Those last weeks were horrible, hoping against hope that something miraculous would happen to make things right. I'm no fan of Hannity but maybe he's not the bad guy that he seems in this instance. Perhaps he was trying to get Trump to the "finish line" so he could live to fight another day.
I'm the first guy who wants to throw Hannity under the bus. I don't trust him. And I'll never forgive his Iraq War and Patriot Act shilling. A guy like that either knew the patriot act was garbage, or had access to competent lawyers to tell him that it did not do what they said it did. I can't get over that. Fuckwits like him helped pull the wool over my eyes for years. I'll never watch or listen to his shows again.
However, when I see jan 6 committee incomplete citations, I trust them even less. So without more info, I'd give hannity the benefit of the doubt over jan 6 committee 10/10 times.
Her replies sound like platitudes to me. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just stringing Hannity along. I need to see more to make a determination.
That's possible. There is no way Trump could have survived without double agents, if you ask me. But it is also possible she was with him until the election and is still on the Trump train...exceptfor the stolen election part. I just really don't feel I have the infoto make a determination.
Thank god someone read the article and applied logical thinking. Everyone else just jumps on this like a bitch in heat over a headline. We are taking the word of fucking MEDIAITE and the unselect committee? They exclude 3 of the 5 points and we all buy it hook line and sinker? Come the fuck on. Show me all the texts in context (and believe me they would if they thought it would help their case). Beyond that, did everyone miss the fact that this completely implodes their narrative? They said this was a huge conspiracy to launch an insurrection. So far all the texts show the total opposite. So now they are relegated to strategically releasing excerpts to get conservatives to turn on each other, like the DeSantis vs Trump headlines they’ve been regurgitating.
Related: I saw an article posted tonight saying NPR fabricated the Gorsuch/Sotominority "mask feud" narrative (fake "news" has been claiming she refuses to sit next to Gorsuch because he won't face diaper, thus is doing her Supreme Court business with Zoom calls.) That clickbait has been repeated all over fake "news" for days, and it's totally falsehood.
The more outrageous a headline is, the more skeptical I am about it. I am not a big Sean Hannity fan, but I am going to need serious proof before I reeeeeeeee. (Obviously if this turns out to be true, I will take a steaming dump of ridicule on him.)
I can hear my 6th grade teacher telling you to put am exclamation there. "But that's not the point," you say. Well then she'll just have to dock you a point.
Hannity and Tucker are both faggots and each one of you that still watch evening Fox lineup are CUCKED FAGGOTS. After ya'll manage to get the cum out your eyes learn what a grifter is and turn off cuck news.
I quit this asshole many years ago. With The_donald I was able to get everything a week ahead and ten times more details then him or Rush. Same goes now for patriots.win
I'm glad you figured this out fren. People are going to give you shit but we all wake up at our own speed. The CIA has mlbeen buying everyone off on TV and radio for years.. Wait till you find out about Tucker...
I think he was trying to get the two senate seats in the sun column, the stolen election was definitely making it hard to get big turnout. Maybe that’s what he meant. Not that I watch him.
yea he's old and stuck in the ways of what he views things should be from 20+ years ago. has not realized the change in the left and the needed change in the right.
I stopped watching when he had Donna Brazille on his his show as if she were on his team. The lying cheatin flaming leftist on his show and he said nothing about the elephant in the room.
I thought this was known by everyone already. Hannity always sucked even before this a don't like engram either fox sucks except tucker and he is shady sometimes but he also seams to do more good than bad. Fox sucks
This is so much worse than we suspected though. Hannity is literally a TRAITOR.
He's a NWO asset.
Rank & Vile
Makes TOTAL sense now.
Cucker Carlson is likely next.
Missed it, did you?
https://radio.foxnews.com/2021/11/17/tucker-carlson-on-what-bidens-relatives-told-him-about-joes-decline/
Dig into Carlsons family.
so, he has empathy? shock horror
He protected Hunter Biden when the laptop scandal broke. Saying the use to be neighbors or some shit. He absolutely went along with the steal. Damn, short memories or newly redpilled?
What about empathy for those whose lives have been destroyed by the actions of that crime family?
No, you dingbat. You've completely missed the point. He said he's always liked Joe Biden, and is close enough to the Biden family they confide in him about Joe's mental health. Tucker has known Joe since he was 22 years old. This would be enough to give anyone with two brain cells to rub together a hint as to what side Tucker is on.
no..he is anal butt buddies with hunter biden who is his best friend
Michael Savage was right all along. Puts Levin and Bongino on my sus af list.
How deep does the treachery run?
Tucker calls out Soros. That more than most. Pick your battles, Carlson should be way down the list.
Shout out to Hannity’s surprise book he dropped for big money right before the 2020 election when he already knew what was gonna happen and knew his ratings would tank and he would be hated after with the rest of Fox News. He is corrupt.
What day was Hannity's first day of his (syndicated) radio broadcast? 9/10/2001. Coincidence?
Holy shit...
Do you have a source for this? I found he did a broadcast in 89. Co hosted a show on fox in 1996.
Found it:
Syndication began through the ABC Radio Networks on September 10, 2001, one day before the September 11 attacks.[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sean_Hannity_Show
wow!
Interesting.
Right? I just found this out as well. My gut has always been good to me and it told me not to pay any attention to Hannity. More proof my gut was right.
He’s always been a fraud.
Phony as a 3 dollar bill.
Listen to him “interview” James Traficant after Jimmy dared to criticize Israel’s influence on the Congress.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2xMzb-SvWcE
Ya it's a shame he chose the path he did.
This isn't as neat as it sounds. They were gearing up contracts for 2002 elections. Beck also went nationally syndicated within a few days of 9/11.
But Hannity had been nationally syndicated for years. My dad listened to him all the time in his shop while I was young (in the mid-late 90s).
Some of y’all are seriously crazy. Thank you for being sane
Yep, Glenn was local in Tampa at the time. His show had modest success in the afternoons. I remember he did a "rally for America" in the middle of the Florida recount where he invited everyone down to the radio station to have a protest and thousands of people showed up in the parking lot. That's when I first heard of him.
Then on 9/11 (literally that morning I think) he suddenly wasn't just local anymore, he got put on nationwide and they preempted local programming on all their stations. I turned on the radio, and there he was. If I recall correctly, after 9/11 is when Clear Channel decided to leave him on nationally, and that's still the same show he has now. I'm not saying that means anything, but I always thought that was a little odd.
Sept. 10th was the day his show was syndicated nationwide by Cumulus Media.
Yes, inquiring minds would like to know.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sean_Hannity_Show#Syndication
Hannity was on the radio in Atlanta for years back in the 1990s. Saying otherwise is just cherry picking dates to try to make a point.
I didn't cherry pick a God damn thing.
Yep
He was around much longer than that. Hannity & Colmes was a thing.
That was such a weird cricket-man, Colmes, I mean. . . 🦗
Lol Jiminy Cricket
Source?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sean_Hannity_Show#Syndication
Dude.... how did you not know that? Always was. All fox news is controlled opposition
Thanks to Obama modifying the Smith Mundt act, every bit of media is fucking propagandized. It’s either controlled opposition or straight up propaganda like CNN. Fuck all of them.
Goes way back further than that my dude, Clinton/Bush families are but two sides of the same globo homo coin
oBaMa is just a puppet controlled by the same masters as that war criminal BUSH and his glowie daddy who was also the VP to Ronald Raygun. All high profile Republicans are swamp.
Always tho?
Yes, always. They were the loudest carnival barker for the Iraq War. Who benefited from that?
This is a tough pill for normies to swallow. Including my parents unfortunately. They just can't comprehend that Fox News could be controlled messaging.
It's literally programming engineered specifically for the soft empty Boomer Brain.
The guy literally wears a CIA pin was anyone truly surprised?
but he knows mma and can hang drywall...
His Carhartts are still the same shade of brown as the day they were purchased.
Has recently purchased more ♿
Hahaha
and has large child bearing hips
And he used to repair his own car
I love how "CIA" just means you're a degenerate who's friends with the central bankers.
I remember when we thought the CIA was into spying on foreign enemies and investigating aliens. In reality, it's just a pathetic clique of drug dealers, bounty hunters, pedos, and murderers.
I'm also pretty sure they've been fucking with us with all the hysteria surrounding UFOs. It's probably just a psyop to make us think the Cabal has otherworldly friends, so we fear rebelling against it.
Me after learning the aleins are working together with the double-secret Rothschilds in their arctic lair
Lol
It is the gay version of Archer.
When an organization does not respond to political power, it will be controlled by economic power, which in turn controls political power.
They may want to do a War Of The Worlds type thing to usher in world government..
If the aliens pick a side, it'll be ours. I've never believed in "evil aliens".
It could go either way, but the prospect of evil aliens is pretty scary
meh. evil gets you awesome tech, but then you and your evil friends kill eachother over who gets to control it and progress stunts itself while the good guys play catch up.
reason 151 popular science fiction is bullshit.
klingons would have never made it to space. palpatine wouldve been assassinated by an imperial dignitary in the most pussy way possible.
LOL wait til you find out what roams the stars are things that make the Klingons look like peaceniks! Sweet innocent little Terran!
Or we could just be their version of "Reality TV" instead.
17th updoot!
I’m surprised he doesn’t have a Mossad pin.
I have said this a dozen times here in the past.
Duh.
Lol
🌎
Yep. Only reason he ever looked like a patriot even in passing is having politicians who are uniparty scum.
I haven’t trusted him since 2016
I washed my hands of that Faggot years ago
Him saying the rank and file were great people at the FBI is when I shut that shit off for good
Tick tock
The only reason I haven't totally dropped Cucker is because he is covering false flags and white genocide. Those are no-no topics for Cabal members.
I’m suspecting that each big player in the controlled opposition gets to report openly on a few chosen subjects, and none of them are allowed the same set. Conversely, they may only push the fake news narratives on a few selected topics, or when specifically directed. This way, a variety of the media figures seem reasonable most of the time, and they are excused for infrequent lapses. For example, Tucker shitting the bed rather than following thru with the Hunter Biden laptop story. Also, Mark Levine condemning Derek Chauvin and saying justice was served.
Except he did follow through, had bobalinsky on, showed the reciepts, and got LITERALLY nowhere with it. No one else picked it up, no agencies asked about it, and nothing came of it.
The Biden campaign didn't even acknowledge it.
So what do you do? Keep repeating it to the very people that already know its true, or gather up other stories and information to make sure your viewers continue to be informed?
I'm just asking, what was he supposed to do?
Bobalinsky was a separate story. Of course you are right that it fizzled because it was ignored / hidden. But the laptop story was much bigger - it’s what we all became aware of here, but none of the normies heard about it when it mattered most. That’s the one national poles found that ~10% of Biden voter would have switched their vote or sat it out if they knew about it in advance. Not saying they wouldn’t have just stolen harder to compensate, but I am saying that Tucker went full cucker. He literally opened the big show claiming that he changed his mind about it because he went to high school with Hunter and he felt bad for the guy struggling with drug addiction.
What’s another 7 or 8 million fraudulent ballots on top of the 30 million you already printed
I seem to recall that Biden's entire laptop was dumped on this website and you could read anything you wanted on it. Is it still available on any site.
FBI has it, they ought to be transparent, right?
Jack Maxey, formerly co-host of Bannon's War Room, posted the entire contents of the laptop on Twitter (minus photos and videos because some of that is likely CP). No idea if it's still up.
The suppressing of that story alone should be a major court case in USA considering we value our freedoms.
You would think so.
Tuckers a release valve.
Honestly, I'm just infuriated that our "elected officials" allowed us to be taken over by such a malicious group of demons.
This is the result of endless greed and decadence. WE are being punished for the sins of a few traitorous bastards (see who passed the Fed).
Due to the manipulation and coercion of said few for decades. I hope God will grant mercy for such psychological warfare that the majority of the populace didn’t know was occurring. What chance did children have? At least I hope God buys that argument. :/
Choice. We have been given chances after chances. Frankly, we still are, but that is coming to an end soon. That is the truth.
This.
Beautifully put. I use a similar analogy for rinos. They take turns who has to throw a nay in the box and piss of their voters. It seems obvious to me.
Judging by how he treated the election steal, I'm operating under the assumption that he had special infiltration orders which allows for the covering if certain nono topics. Until proven otherwise.
Tucker didn't really do anything wrong with the election steal, though.
You have to remember that even though WE KNOW the election was stolen, tucker is a journalist and has to have evidence to prove it before he can say it.
If you recall, everyone freaked out about tucker because he ran a video about how America is still the greatest country.....
Why did we freak out about that? He's not wrong, and it appeared he was as stunned about the election as anyone, and used his position to try and calm people a bit.
In the end, I have no idea who's a good guy or a bad guy, but I do know that our side is just as prone to hyperbolic overreaction as their side.
Cowardice is no excuse, but people do need to remember that he is a journalist, and has to watch his claims very carefully. If he was the only one talking about it, and could not back up the claims, he could easily be sued into oblivion. I do understand not wanting to sacrifice your platform, if others are not coming with the receipts. Some of the blame rests on Trumps legal team for not presenting the evidence (and there was/is mountains) in a way that was not refutable. I understand that they were up against the entire media apparatus, the courts, and the DOJ, but they also made a lot of slip ups and were not focused. They allowed so many theories and arguments to get into the ether, that it was hard to tell what the actual case was.
That being said, anyone that does not believe there was election fraud at his level, is a liar (for whatever reason).
There were mountains of evidence already on November 4th and I don't buy that he didn't know about any of it. He kept his mouth shut and shut down any attempt at discussion just like everybody else did, and likely for the same reasons. Best case: fear of losing his job and credibility. Not good enough for me.
covering them how? im sorry but sitting on pins and needles hoping tucker will cover an issue we already know more about isnt my idea of being well informed. everything he says and does is an affectation. that always bothered me. now we know why. the ONLY reason he covers any issue is so that conservatives will not go elsewhere and globo homos can control what his audience hears. Tucker is poison of the worst kind.
It's called controlled opposition. Tucker will say many true things, but in it is sprinkled a bunch of bullshit and at any point his handlers want him to roll over he will. Broken clock is right twice a day.
Also just in: Sean hannity is a massive faggot who loves when the rank and file of the fbi pound his starfish
Rumor has it that Limp Bizkit album was about him and the Daily Wire staff.
Guzzling FBI hotdog flavored water
He wears a cia pin
all that flair he wears...starting to look like a waiter from Chotchkies
Initech
Penetrode
P.S. watch out for your cornhole bud.
Just wear a stapler-shaped flair
How do you feel about people who only wear 37 pieces of flair?
that's a bare minimum for people to express themselves
Advertising his participation in Project Mockingbird 2.0.
fox is not with us. just more swamp
Paul Ryan. Enough said.
sorry guys. Kayleigh McEnany agreed with Sean's texts.
She textes what seem like dismissive platitudes. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just simply stringing Hannity, who is and has always been an annoying douche, along.
I always keep an open tab on people but try to give them the benefit of the doubt, so even though her replies seemed treacherous, there is a chance that she was just playing along and "agreeing" to stay on the inside track with the treasonous swine like Hannity.
Am I wrong to like Tucker? Some of the stories of his that I’ve been watching recently are absolutely devastating to the Dems/Neocons, and I just can’t fathom how he could be controlled opposition or something.
His reporting seems decidedly good-for-us (i.e. truthful), and doesn’t pull punches—at least compared to what I know/expect him to be reporting on, from other sources like here. If he were compromised, I can’t see a perspective from which the DS would think it wise instruct him to carry on doing what he does—as opposed to just not reporting the way he does.
I guess it must say something about Fox, that they seemingly allow him to report whatever he wants. Is it because he’s too popular and successful to get rid of, and the boat for doing so sailed years ago? Or is there something deeper and more nefarious going on? I’m really curious to see what others think about this, because I seldom see it come up, and he’s rarely mentioned in threads like this—good, bad, or otherwise.
Hannity to Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan: “Guys, we have a clear path to land the plane in 9 days. He can’t mention the election again. Ever. I did not have a good call with him today. And worse, I’m not sure what is left to do or say, and I don’t like knowing if it’s truly understood. Ideas?”
Granted, its easy to take shit out of context and create the narrative you want. This isn't a good look. But if one considered it thru this lens - this could have been Pence's conditions to not 25th him out. Which would change the context considerably. And, considering they conveniently left the rest of the "plan" out, leads me to believe that this was done to leave everyone with the impression they are narrating and not what was actually said.
Mark meadows gave them 7,000 texts and emails.
On of them is a text from Hannity floating the idea that maybe Trump can just go to Florida fe jan 8th to the 20th
Let's not forget how hard that snake Pelosi was scheming, even with the military heads. I wouldn't be one bit surprised to learn that she was trying to convince The Joint Chiefs of Staff to LITERALLY go to the White House and put cuffs on GEOTUS.
I can also see how Hannity either knew or knew enough to fear that the dems and establishment wanted to take Trump down hard in the last few days. Those last weeks were horrible, hoping against hope that something miraculous would happen to make things right. I'm no fan of Hannity but maybe he's not the bad guy that he seems in this instance. Perhaps he was trying to get Trump to the "finish line" so he could live to fight another day.
I'm the first guy who wants to throw Hannity under the bus. I don't trust him. And I'll never forgive his Iraq War and Patriot Act shilling. A guy like that either knew the patriot act was garbage, or had access to competent lawyers to tell him that it did not do what they said it did. I can't get over that. Fuckwits like him helped pull the wool over my eyes for years. I'll never watch or listen to his shows again.
However, when I see jan 6 committee incomplete citations, I trust them even less. So without more info, I'd give hannity the benefit of the doubt over jan 6 committee 10/10 times.
All great points.
https://www.mediaite.com/news/hannity-texted-white-house-a-five-point-plan-for-how-to-deal-with-trump-on-jan-7th-house-committee-reveals/
thanks. Need to upvote source posts pedes to keep them near the top.
This is gonna crush some Frens souls, the beloved KMac sold the Don down the river.
No wonder she got a show on Faux News, makes sense now
This should piss Trump off more than anyone.
Her replies sound like platitudes to me. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just stringing Hannity along. I need to see more to make a determination.
Point taken, there is that possibility.
So KMAC is a double agent then ?
That's possible. There is no way Trump could have survived without double agents, if you ask me. But it is also possible she was with him until the election and is still on the Trump train...exceptfor the stolen election part. I just really don't feel I have the infoto make a determination.
I can appreciate that, myself I’m just skeptical of everything any more and anyone. I didn’t trust easily before, and now the level is elevated.
I'm on the same page as you... I just don't trust ANYTHING whether it aligns with my beliefs or not until I get enough independent info.
I enjoyed reading your thread. I agree
what did kmac do?
It’s better that you decide, her response to 11/03 is in the article.
11/03, the election coup. Hannity proposed a plan to steer the Don away from speaking out, and KMac agreed.
Did you read it differently ?
I stand corrected on the date 11/03, and inserted that as the coup date rather than the date of the conversation.
That said she sided with Hannity and now works for Faux News.
The other parts of the plan are probably just focus on fixing election laws.
Yep
I agree…paying far too much deference to the medical establishment and their “science”
I won’t completely bash her not knowing the risks, but it does seem extreme, almost phobic on some level.
Most American parents chop up their son's dick just to please Jesus, just saying
Hannity even owns the lie about "The FBI rank and file" being all a bunch of patriots and that it's only 'a few rotten apples' at the top.
That's when I tuned Hannity out, years ago - I knew that was bullshit.
That's what did it for me too!
"DR MEHMET OZ: COMING UP"
Yep, and if we listen to his words we can hear him talking to Trump to seduce an endorsement.
Hannity is a goofball. But I am not buying what mediaite is selling. They are libtards.
Agreed mediaite is libtarded. But you wouldn't find this story on Fix.
Right along with his 'alphabet agency' lapel pins.
He wears a CIA lapel pen. What did you expect?
Except the "election" was in fact stolen.
He's wearing a CIA emblem pin in that very photo for fucks sake.
Why is anyone still watching fox? I guess 2020 is forgotten..
sean hannity shot down any 9/11 hoax talk. just more swamp people. all need to go
If anyone is surprised Fox news isn't on our side, they should be sitting at the kiddy table.
That would be a lot of older conservatives.
I've never liked Hannity. I've never trusted Hannity.
But
If the Cunt Committee is releasing this, they're releasing it for a purpose.
How do we know what hannity texted to the whitehouse?
It was made public by the UnSelect Committee on January 6 https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/2022-1-20.BGT%20Letter%20to%20Ivanka%20Trump%20-%20Cover%20Letter%20and%20Enclosures_Redacted%202.pdf
Thank god someone read the article and applied logical thinking. Everyone else just jumps on this like a bitch in heat over a headline. We are taking the word of fucking MEDIAITE and the unselect committee? They exclude 3 of the 5 points and we all buy it hook line and sinker? Come the fuck on. Show me all the texts in context (and believe me they would if they thought it would help their case). Beyond that, did everyone miss the fact that this completely implodes their narrative? They said this was a huge conspiracy to launch an insurrection. So far all the texts show the total opposite. So now they are relegated to strategically releasing excerpts to get conservatives to turn on each other, like the DeSantis vs Trump headlines they’ve been regurgitating.
Related: I saw an article posted tonight saying NPR fabricated the Gorsuch/Sotominority "mask feud" narrative (fake "news" has been claiming she refuses to sit next to Gorsuch because he won't face diaper, thus is doing her Supreme Court business with Zoom calls.) That clickbait has been repeated all over fake "news" for days, and it's totally falsehood.
The more outrageous a headline is, the more skeptical I am about it. I am not a big Sean Hannity fan, but I am going to need serious proof before I reeeeeeeee. (Obviously if this turns out to be true, I will take a steaming dump of ridicule on him.)
To control the narrative, to divide the opposition by deception by failing to release full context.
Because the trustworthy and honest people in government told us so.
so is Tucker but we wont talk about that...
And how many interviews did Trump give him?
I watch tucker, I have never been able to get through a hannity show unless they somehow have a MORE conservative/based guest on.
Hannity's clock is a fucking Cuck-Kook clock for the derp state.
lmao this is the exact reason I have not watched him in years. His shows always repeated themselves over. and over. and over. Oh, and over.
Better watch your tone, jujitsu master Hannity will hunt you down.
c.i.a.nnity
yeah, they all come from the same stock. They're character actors
Rachel Maddow of the right
Madcow
This is my shocked face.
I can hear my 6th grade teacher telling you to put am exclamation there. "But that's not the point," you say. Well then she'll just have to dock you a point.
lol apparently you and I went to 6th grade together
I used to listen to Hannity. For like 3 months. In 2002. That was plenty.
Hannity and Tucker are both faggots and each one of you that still watch evening Fox lineup are CUCKED FAGGOTS. After ya'll manage to get the cum out your eyes learn what a grifter is and turn off cuck news.
I quit this asshole many years ago. With The_donald I was able to get everything a week ahead and ten times more details then him or Rush. Same goes now for patriots.win
HUGE faggot
UGE
Isn't that the whole point of the maga movement? That these old state felating gop fucks don't represent us?
Hannity is so damb annoying. His guests get to talk for three minutes, he speaks for 15.
I'm glad you figured this out fren. People are going to give you shit but we all wake up at our own speed. The CIA has mlbeen buying everyone off on TV and radio for years.. Wait till you find out about Tucker...
Have you realized yet your text messages aren’t safe?
I think he was trying to get the two senate seats in the sun column, the stolen election was definitely making it hard to get big turnout. Maybe that’s what he meant. Not that I watch him.
yea he's old and stuck in the ways of what he views things should be from 20+ years ago. has not realized the change in the left and the needed change in the right.
This is a known fact.
He's also pro vaccine
Isn't this faggot running around pretending to be Maga now?
All you have to do is to just notice those lapels he wears
I haven’t listened to hannity in over 3 years. Dumped him after the tick tock bullshit about locking Hilary up.
War Room only in my household now.
Here here. The Source.
Always has been a grifting neocon. As is the network he works for.
And the sun rises in the east.
I stopped watching when he had Donna Brazille on his his show as if she were on his team. The lying cheatin flaming leftist on his show and he said nothing about the elephant in the room.
Where do I go to read this story it's just a snapshot
https://www.mediaite.com/news/hannity-texted-white-house-a-five-point-plan-for-how-to-deal-with-trump-on-jan-7th-house-committee-reveals/
Thanks
I thought this was known by everyone already. Hannity always sucked even before this a don't like engram either fox sucks except tucker and he is shady sometimes but he also seams to do more good than bad. Fox sucks
Is there a link associated with this picture so I can do some digging?
Does he mention in the letter that he practices MMA?