2487
Comments (418)
sorted by:
365
deleted 365 points ago +370 / -5
231
MoreTorbaLessKushner 231 points ago +240 / -9

This is so much worse than we suspected though. Hannity is literally a TRAITOR.

He's a NWO asset.

167
Skogin 167 points ago +168 / -1

Rank & Vile

87
MoreTorbaLessKushner 87 points ago +90 / -3

Makes TOTAL sense now.

22
morethanaconquerer2 22 points ago +34 / -12

Cucker Carlson is likely next.

32
6
morethanaconquerer2 6 points ago +8 / -2

Dig into Carlsons family.

5
labiator 5 points ago +18 / -13

so, he has empathy? shock horror

32
AlFreeman 32 points ago +35 / -3

He protected Hunter Biden when the laptop scandal broke. Saying the use to be neighbors or some shit. He absolutely went along with the steal. Damn, short memories or newly redpilled?

6
paradox123 6 points ago +6 / -0

What about empathy for those whose lives have been destroyed by the actions of that crime family?

2
Jack_HinsonTN 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, you dingbat. You've completely missed the point. He said he's always liked Joe Biden, and is close enough to the Biden family they confide in him about Joe's mental health. Tucker has known Joe since he was 22 years old. This would be enough to give anyone with two brain cells to rub together a hint as to what side Tucker is on.

1
Dystopiaslayer 1 point ago +4 / -3

no..he is anal butt buddies with hunter biden who is his best friend

10
OwnaLib87 10 points ago +10 / -0

Michael Savage was right all along. Puts Levin and Bongino on my sus af list.

How deep does the treachery run?

7
Not_your_King 7 points ago +8 / -1

Tucker calls out Soros. That more than most. Pick your battles, Carlson should be way down the list.

4
ImGumbyDammit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shout out to Hannity’s surprise book he dropped for big money right before the 2020 election when he already knew what was gonna happen and knew his ratings would tank and he would be hated after with the rest of Fox News. He is corrupt.

86
aveydey 86 points ago +88 / -2

What day was Hannity's first day of his (syndicated) radio broadcast? 9/10/2001. Coincidence?

37
MoreTorbaLessKushner 37 points ago +41 / -4

Holy shit...

15
Jackhererer 15 points ago +15 / -0

Do you have a source for this? I found he did a broadcast in 89. Co hosted a show on fox in 1996.

43
cucumbersandwich 43 points ago +44 / -1

Found it:

Syndication began through the ABC Radio Networks on September 10, 2001, one day before the September 11 attacks.[8]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sean_Hannity_Show

wow!

7
Jackhererer 7 points ago +7 / -0

Interesting.

19
cucumbersandwich 19 points ago +19 / -0

Right? I just found this out as well. My gut has always been good to me and it told me not to pay any attention to Hannity. More proof my gut was right.

16
OperationRudyRusso 16 points ago +16 / -0

He’s always been a fraud.

Phony as a 3 dollar bill.

Listen to him “interview” James Traficant after Jimmy dared to criticize Israel’s influence on the Congress.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2xMzb-SvWcE

3
Jackhererer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya it's a shame he chose the path he did.

5
Ivleeeg 5 points ago +5 / -0

This isn't as neat as it sounds. They were gearing up contracts for 2002 elections. Beck also went nationally syndicated within a few days of 9/11.

But Hannity had been nationally syndicated for years. My dad listened to him all the time in his shop while I was young (in the mid-late 90s).

4
AllWeDoIsWinFL 4 points ago +6 / -2

Some of y’all are seriously crazy. Thank you for being sane

1
Liberals_Suck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, Glenn was local in Tampa at the time. His show had modest success in the afternoons. I remember he did a "rally for America" in the middle of the Florida recount where he invited everyone down to the radio station to have a protest and thousands of people showed up in the parking lot. That's when I first heard of him.

Then on 9/11 (literally that morning I think) he suddenly wasn't just local anymore, he got put on nationwide and they preempted local programming on all their stations. I turned on the radio, and there he was. If I recall correctly, after 9/11 is when Clear Channel decided to leave him on nationally, and that's still the same show he has now. I'm not saying that means anything, but I always thought that was a little odd.

16
havemydata 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sept. 10th was the day his show was syndicated nationwide by Cumulus Media.

7
cucumbersandwich 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, inquiring minds would like to know.

11
TravelingSalesman 11 points ago +14 / -3

Hannity was on the radio in Atlanta for years back in the 1990s. Saying otherwise is just cherry picking dates to try to make a point.

0
TurdFergusen 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yep

10
covok48 10 points ago +11 / -1

He was around much longer than that. Hannity & Colmes was a thing.

4
plznosteal 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was such a weird cricket-man, Colmes, I mean. . . 🦗

2
Stolen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol Jiminy Cricket

62
MagaNV 62 points ago +63 / -1

Dude.... how did you not know that? Always was. All fox news is controlled opposition

38
7thGenTexan 38 points ago +38 / -0

Thanks to Obama modifying the Smith Mundt act, every bit of media is fucking propagandized. It’s either controlled opposition or straight up propaganda like CNN. Fuck all of them.

13
TurdFergusen 13 points ago +13 / -0

Goes way back further than that my dude, Clinton/Bush families are but two sides of the same globo homo coin

6
trump4045 6 points ago +6 / -0

oBaMa is just a puppet controlled by the same masters as that war criminal BUSH and his glowie daddy who was also the VP to Ronald Raygun. All high profile Republicans are swamp.

11
ADEPhase3AnimalTrial 11 points ago +11 / -0

Always tho?

31
BigIronBigIron 31 points ago +31 / -0

Yes, always. They were the loudest carnival barker for the Iraq War. Who benefited from that?

17
the_federalist 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is a tough pill for normies to swallow. Including my parents unfortunately. They just can't comprehend that Fox News could be controlled messaging.

13
PraiseBeToScience 13 points ago +16 / -3

It's literally programming engineered specifically for the soft empty Boomer Brain.

50
making_upvotes 50 points ago +51 / -1

The guy literally wears a CIA pin was anyone truly surprised?

47
xmetalgod 47 points ago +47 / -0

but he knows mma and can hang drywall...

42
Fenianlad 42 points ago +42 / -0

His Carhartts are still the same shade of brown as the day they were purchased.

20
FrankWisner 20 points ago +20 / -0

Has recently purchased more ♿

13
Fenianlad 13 points ago +13 / -0

Hahaha

7
Retard_Strength 7 points ago +7 / -0

and has large child bearing hips

4
WhyTee1 4 points ago +4 / -0

And he used to repair his own car

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
44
MoreTorbaLessKushner 44 points ago +46 / -2

I love how "CIA" just means you're a degenerate who's friends with the central bankers.

I remember when we thought the CIA was into spying on foreign enemies and investigating aliens. In reality, it's just a pathetic clique of drug dealers, bounty hunters, pedos, and murderers.

I'm also pretty sure they've been fucking with us with all the hysteria surrounding UFOs. It's probably just a psyop to make us think the Cabal has otherworldly friends, so we fear rebelling against it.

10
GrayManNumber333 10 points ago +10 / -0

It is the gay version of Archer.

6
paradox123 6 points ago +6 / -0

When an organization does not respond to political power, it will be controlled by economic power, which in turn controls political power.

5
gustodog 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's probably just a psyop to make us think the Cabal has otherworldly friends, so we fear rebelling against it.

They may want to do a War Of The Worlds type thing to usher in world government..

-3
WarGreymon77 -3 points ago +6 / -9

If the aliens pick a side, it'll be ours. I've never believed in "evil aliens".

5
Joe_Snow 5 points ago +5 / -0

It could go either way, but the prospect of evil aliens is pretty scary

6
Cminc 6 points ago +7 / -1

meh. evil gets you awesome tech, but then you and your evil friends kill eachother over who gets to control it and progress stunts itself while the good guys play catch up.

reason 151 popular science fiction is bullshit.

klingons would have never made it to space. palpatine wouldve been assassinated by an imperial dignitary in the most pussy way possible.

4
BladesOfSteel2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL wait til you find out what roams the stars are things that make the Klingons look like peaceniks! Sweet innocent little Terran!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Jack_HinsonTN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or we could just be their version of "Reality TV" instead.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
CovfefeNinja 3 points ago +3 / -0

17th updoot!

3
OperationRudyRusso 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m surprised he doesn’t have a Mossad pin.

3
Bramage 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have said this a dozen times here in the past.

10
malkontent2024 10 points ago +12 / -2

Duh.

21
Magazord2020 [S] 21 points ago +21 / -0

Lol

17
grenades_and_ham 17 points ago +17 / -0

🌎

 👩🏻‍🚀🔫👩🏻‍🚀
4
GrayManNumber333 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. Only reason he ever looked like a patriot even in passing is having politicians who are uniparty scum.

1
Flipakademsarepedos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven’t trusted him since 2016

178
Sea_Still 178 points ago +179 / -1

I washed my hands of that Faggot years ago

102
America_No_1 102 points ago +102 / -0

Him saying the rank and file were great people at the FBI is when I shut that shit off for good

25
Darkheartisland 25 points ago +25 / -0

Tick tock

60
MoreTorbaLessKushner 60 points ago +67 / -7

The only reason I haven't totally dropped Cucker is because he is covering false flags and white genocide. Those are no-no topics for Cabal members.

36
Skogin 36 points ago +36 / -0

I’m suspecting that each big player in the controlled opposition gets to report openly on a few chosen subjects, and none of them are allowed the same set. Conversely, they may only push the fake news narratives on a few selected topics, or when specifically directed. This way, a variety of the media figures seem reasonable most of the time, and they are excused for infrequent lapses. For example, Tucker shitting the bed rather than following thru with the Hunter Biden laptop story. Also, Mark Levine condemning Derek Chauvin and saying justice was served.

33
Gadsden 33 points ago +34 / -1

Except he did follow through, had bobalinsky on, showed the reciepts, and got LITERALLY nowhere with it. No one else picked it up, no agencies asked about it, and nothing came of it.

The Biden campaign didn't even acknowledge it.

So what do you do? Keep repeating it to the very people that already know its true, or gather up other stories and information to make sure your viewers continue to be informed?

I'm just asking, what was he supposed to do?

13
Skogin 13 points ago +14 / -1

Bobalinsky was a separate story. Of course you are right that it fizzled because it was ignored / hidden. But the laptop story was much bigger - it’s what we all became aware of here, but none of the normies heard about it when it mattered most. That’s the one national poles found that ~10% of Biden voter would have switched their vote or sat it out if they knew about it in advance. Not saying they wouldn’t have just stolen harder to compensate, but I am saying that Tucker went full cucker. He literally opened the big show claiming that he changed his mind about it because he went to high school with Hunter and he felt bad for the guy struggling with drug addiction.

6
xBigCoffinHunter 6 points ago +6 / -0

What’s another 7 or 8 million fraudulent ballots on top of the 30 million you already printed

1
BillGall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I seem to recall that Biden's entire laptop was dumped on this website and you could read anything you wanted on it. Is it still available on any site.

1
Skogin 1 point ago +1 / -0

FBI has it, they ought to be transparent, right?

1
TexasJack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jack Maxey, formerly co-host of Bannon's War Room, posted the entire contents of the laptop on Twitter (minus photos and videos because some of that is likely CP). No idea if it's still up.

4
MAGAsJustBegun 4 points ago +4 / -0

The suppressing of that story alone should be a major court case in USA considering we value our freedoms.

1
Gadsden 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would think so.

3
OwnaLib87 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tuckers a release valve.

9
MoreTorbaLessKushner 9 points ago +11 / -2

Honestly, I'm just infuriated that our "elected officials" allowed us to be taken over by such a malicious group of demons.

This is the result of endless greed and decadence. WE are being punished for the sins of a few traitorous bastards (see who passed the Fed).

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
Barack-Obama2 0 points ago +1 / -1

Due to the manipulation and coercion of said few for decades. I hope God will grant mercy for such psychological warfare that the majority of the populace didn’t know was occurring. What chance did children have? At least I hope God buys that argument. :/

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Choice. We have been given chances after chances. Frankly, we still are, but that is coming to an end soon. That is the truth.

8
making_upvotes 8 points ago +8 / -0

This.

6
BumpForTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Beautifully put. I use a similar analogy for rinos. They take turns who has to throw a nay in the box and piss of their voters. It seems obvious to me.

13
rapsheet1mile 13 points ago +13 / -0

Judging by how he treated the election steal, I'm operating under the assumption that he had special infiltration orders which allows for the covering if certain nono topics. Until proven otherwise.

10
Gadsden 10 points ago +13 / -3

Tucker didn't really do anything wrong with the election steal, though.

You have to remember that even though WE KNOW the election was stolen, tucker is a journalist and has to have evidence to prove it before he can say it.

If you recall, everyone freaked out about tucker because he ran a video about how America is still the greatest country.....

Why did we freak out about that? He's not wrong, and it appeared he was as stunned about the election as anyone, and used his position to try and calm people a bit.

In the end, I have no idea who's a good guy or a bad guy, but I do know that our side is just as prone to hyperbolic overreaction as their side.

4
CA445 4 points ago +5 / -1

Cowardice is no excuse, but people do need to remember that he is a journalist, and has to watch his claims very carefully. If he was the only one talking about it, and could not back up the claims, he could easily be sued into oblivion. I do understand not wanting to sacrifice your platform, if others are not coming with the receipts. Some of the blame rests on Trumps legal team for not presenting the evidence (and there was/is mountains) in a way that was not refutable. I understand that they were up against the entire media apparatus, the courts, and the DOJ, but they also made a lot of slip ups and were not focused. They allowed so many theories and arguments to get into the ether, that it was hard to tell what the actual case was.

That being said, anyone that does not believe there was election fraud at his level, is a liar (for whatever reason).

4
rapsheet1mile 4 points ago +5 / -1

There were mountains of evidence already on November 4th and I don't buy that he didn't know about any of it. He kept his mouth shut and shut down any attempt at discussion just like everybody else did, and likely for the same reasons. Best case: fear of losing his job and credibility. Not good enough for me.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
9
ivana-humpalot 9 points ago +9 / -0

covering them how? im sorry but sitting on pins and needles hoping tucker will cover an issue we already know more about isnt my idea of being well informed. everything he says and does is an affectation. that always bothered me. now we know why. the ONLY reason he covers any issue is so that conservatives will not go elsewhere and globo homos can control what his audience hears. Tucker is poison of the worst kind.

3
MAGAlifeChoseMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's called controlled opposition. Tucker will say many true things, but in it is sprinkled a bunch of bullshit and at any point his handlers want him to roll over he will. Broken clock is right twice a day.

123
Geotus69 123 points ago +124 / -1

Also just in: Sean hannity is a massive faggot who loves when the rank and file of the fbi pound his starfish

22
FitOfficial 22 points ago +22 / -0

Rumor has it that Limp Bizkit album was about him and the Daily Wire staff.

16
AOCDickPics 16 points ago +16 / -0

Guzzling FBI hotdog flavored water

101
Winter_Is_Coming2020 101 points ago +101 / -0

He wears a cia pin

52
one3five 52 points ago +52 / -0

all that flair he wears...starting to look like a waiter from Chotchkies

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
8
gb1787 8 points ago +8 / -0

Initech

6
MAGAmemnon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Penetrode

P.S. watch out for your cornhole bud.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
NoComment 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just wear a stapler-shaped flair

3
TravelingSalesman 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you feel about people who only wear 37 pieces of flair?

2
one3five 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's a bare minimum for people to express themselves

8
HappyHelper 8 points ago +8 / -0

Advertising his participation in Project Mockingbird 2.0.

84
sweeswee14 84 points ago +86 / -2

fox is not with us. just more swamp

40
MoreTorbaLessKushner 40 points ago +42 / -2

Paul Ryan. Enough said.

9
Liberty49220 9 points ago +10 / -1

sorry guys. Kayleigh McEnany agreed with Sean's texts.

12
Pepedom 12 points ago +12 / -0

She textes what seem like dismissive platitudes. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just simply stringing Hannity, who is and has always been an annoying douche, along.

8
mailinvoter 8 points ago +9 / -1

I always keep an open tab on people but try to give them the benefit of the doubt, so even though her replies seemed treacherous, there is a chance that she was just playing along and "agreeing" to stay on the inside track with the treasonous swine like Hannity.

2
CactusCactus 2 points ago +3 / -1

Am I wrong to like Tucker? Some of the stories of his that I’ve been watching recently are absolutely devastating to the Dems/Neocons, and I just can’t fathom how he could be controlled opposition or something.

His reporting seems decidedly good-for-us (i.e. truthful), and doesn’t pull punches—at least compared to what I know/expect him to be reporting on, from other sources like here. If he were compromised, I can’t see a perspective from which the DS would think it wise instruct him to carry on doing what he does—as opposed to just not reporting the way he does.

I guess it must say something about Fox, that they seemingly allow him to report whatever he wants. Is it because he’s too popular and successful to get rid of, and the boat for doing so sailed years ago? Or is there something deeper and more nefarious going on? I’m really curious to see what others think about this, because I seldom see it come up, and he’s rarely mentioned in threads like this—good, bad, or otherwise.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
55
Magazord2020 [S] 55 points ago +55 / -0

Hannity to Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan: “Guys, we have a clear path to land the plane in 9 days. He can’t mention the election again. Ever. I did not have a good call with him today. And worse, I’m not sure what is left to do or say, and I don’t like knowing if it’s truly understood. Ideas?”

21
JohnCocktoastin 21 points ago +23 / -2

Granted, its easy to take shit out of context and create the narrative you want. This isn't a good look. But if one considered it thru this lens - this could have been Pence's conditions to not 25th him out. Which would change the context considerably. And, considering they conveniently left the rest of the "plan" out, leads me to believe that this was done to leave everyone with the impression they are narrating and not what was actually said.

6
QLARP 6 points ago +7 / -1

Mark meadows gave them 7,000 texts and emails.

On of them is a text from Hannity floating the idea that maybe Trump can just go to Florida fe jan 8th to the 20th

6
SaltiTaralli 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let's not forget how hard that snake Pelosi was scheming, even with the military heads. I wouldn't be one bit surprised to learn that she was trying to convince The Joint Chiefs of Staff to LITERALLY go to the White House and put cuffs on GEOTUS.

6
SaltiTaralli 6 points ago +8 / -2

I can also see how Hannity either knew or knew enough to fear that the dems and establishment wanted to take Trump down hard in the last few days. Those last weeks were horrible, hoping against hope that something miraculous would happen to make things right. I'm no fan of Hannity but maybe he's not the bad guy that he seems in this instance. Perhaps he was trying to get Trump to the "finish line" so he could live to fight another day.

12
JohnCocktoastin 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm the first guy who wants to throw Hannity under the bus. I don't trust him. And I'll never forgive his Iraq War and Patriot Act shilling. A guy like that either knew the patriot act was garbage, or had access to competent lawyers to tell him that it did not do what they said it did. I can't get over that. Fuckwits like him helped pull the wool over my eyes for years. I'll never watch or listen to his shows again.

However, when I see jan 6 committee incomplete citations, I trust them even less. So without more info, I'd give hannity the benefit of the doubt over jan 6 committee 10/10 times.

3
SaltiTaralli 3 points ago +3 / -0

All great points.

53
8
Liberty49220 8 points ago +8 / -0

thanks. Need to upvote source posts pedes to keep them near the top.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
45
Snoman 45 points ago +51 / -6

This is gonna crush some Frens souls, the beloved KMac sold the Don down the river.

No wonder she got a show on Faux News, makes sense now

31
MoreTorbaLessKushner 31 points ago +33 / -2

This should piss Trump off more than anyone.

16
Pepedom 16 points ago +16 / -0

Her replies sound like platitudes to me. There's a chance she was relaying all this to Trump and they were just stringing Hannity along. I need to see more to make a determination.

4
Snoman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Point taken, there is that possibility.

So KMAC is a double agent then ?

5
Pepedom 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's possible. There is no way Trump could have survived without double agents, if you ask me. But it is also possible she was with him until the election and is still on the Trump train...exceptfor the stolen election part. I just really don't feel I have the infoto make a determination.

5
Snoman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can appreciate that, myself I’m just skeptical of everything any more and anyone. I didn’t trust easily before, and now the level is elevated.

3
Pepedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm on the same page as you... I just don't trust ANYTHING whether it aligns with my beliefs or not until I get enough independent info.

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

I enjoyed reading your thread. I agree

8
lordvon 8 points ago +11 / -3

what did kmac do?

14
Snoman 14 points ago +14 / -0

It’s better that you decide, her response to 11/03 is in the article.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
11
Snoman 11 points ago +11 / -0

11/03, the election coup. Hannity proposed a plan to steer the Don away from speaking out, and KMac agreed.

Did you read it differently ?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
Snoman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stand corrected on the date 11/03, and inserted that as the coup date rather than the date of the conversation.

That said she sided with Hannity and now works for Faux News.

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

The other parts of the plan are probably just focus on fixing election laws.

4
Magazord2020 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep

3
deleted 3 points ago +12 / -9
9
gb1787 9 points ago +9 / -0

I agree…paying far too much deference to the medical establishment and their “science”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
Snoman 8 points ago +8 / -0

I won’t completely bash her not knowing the risks, but it does seem extreme, almost phobic on some level.

0
BigIronBigIron 0 points ago +7 / -7

Most American parents chop up their son's dick just to please Jesus, just saying

31
StolenElectionsKill 31 points ago +31 / -0

Hannity even owns the lie about "The FBI rank and file" being all a bunch of patriots and that it's only 'a few rotten apples' at the top.

That's when I tuned Hannity out, years ago - I knew that was bullshit.

10
EDM4Trump 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's what did it for me too!

23
Magazord2020 [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

"DR MEHMET OZ: COMING UP"

12
Snoman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep, and if we listen to his words we can hear him talking to Trump to seduce an endorsement.

20
couranto 20 points ago +21 / -1

Hannity is a goofball. But I am not buying what mediaite is selling. They are libtards.

9
Magazord2020 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

Agreed mediaite is libtarded. But you wouldn't find this story on Fix.

16
loooooof 16 points ago +16 / -0

Right along with his 'alphabet agency' lapel pins.

14
alienjesus 14 points ago +14 / -0

He wears a CIA lapel pen. What did you expect?

13
spezisacuckold 13 points ago +13 / -0

Except the "election" was in fact stolen.

11
TAIWANNUMBERONE 11 points ago +11 / -0

He's wearing a CIA emblem pin in that very photo for fucks sake.

10
DWAC_t0_the_m00n 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why is anyone still watching fox? I guess 2020 is forgotten..

10
evan4freedom 10 points ago +12 / -2

sean hannity shot down any 9/11 hoax talk. just more swamp people. all need to go

9
Wexit-Delecto 9 points ago +9 / -0

If anyone is surprised Fox news isn't on our side, they should be sitting at the kiddy table.

4
Julia_J 4 points ago +4 / -0

That would be a lot of older conservatives.

9
POWESHOW 9 points ago +9 / -0

I've never liked Hannity. I've never trusted Hannity.

But

If the Cunt Committee is releasing this, they're releasing it for a purpose.

8
kommisar6 8 points ago +8 / -0

How do we know what hannity texted to the whitehouse?

12
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
Corse46 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thank god someone read the article and applied logical thinking. Everyone else just jumps on this like a bitch in heat over a headline. We are taking the word of fucking MEDIAITE and the unselect committee? They exclude 3 of the 5 points and we all buy it hook line and sinker? Come the fuck on. Show me all the texts in context (and believe me they would if they thought it would help their case). Beyond that, did everyone miss the fact that this completely implodes their narrative? They said this was a huge conspiracy to launch an insurrection. So far all the texts show the total opposite. So now they are relegated to strategically releasing excerpts to get conservatives to turn on each other, like the DeSantis vs Trump headlines they’ve been regurgitating.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

Related: I saw an article posted tonight saying NPR fabricated the Gorsuch/Sotominority "mask feud" narrative (fake "news" has been claiming she refuses to sit next to Gorsuch because he won't face diaper, thus is doing her Supreme Court business with Zoom calls.) That clickbait has been repeated all over fake "news" for days, and it's totally falsehood.

The more outrageous a headline is, the more skeptical I am about it. I am not a big Sean Hannity fan, but I am going to need serious proof before I reeeeeeeee. (Obviously if this turns out to be true, I will take a steaming dump of ridicule on him.)

1
2stupid 1 point ago +1 / -0

To control the narrative, to divide the opposition by deception by failing to release full context.

1
2stupid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the trustworthy and honest people in government told us so.

8
ivana-humpalot 8 points ago +8 / -0

so is Tucker but we wont talk about that...

8
chickeninoven 8 points ago +9 / -1

And how many interviews did Trump give him?

7
based_trekkie 7 points ago +7 / -0

I watch tucker, I have never been able to get through a hannity show unless they somehow have a MORE conservative/based guest on.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
based_trekkie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hannity's clock is a fucking Cuck-Kook clock for the derp state.

2
Krysdavar 2 points ago +2 / -0

lmao this is the exact reason I have not watched him in years. His shows always repeated themselves over. and over. and over. Oh, and over.

7
SquareSaltine 7 points ago +7 / -0

Better watch your tone, jujitsu master Hannity will hunt you down.

7
GoodvsEvil2 7 points ago +7 / -0

c.i.a.nnity

3
SCP0073 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah, they all come from the same stock. They're character actors

6
Muttsbitetoo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Rachel Maddow of the right

1
Julia_J 1 point ago +1 / -0

Madcow

6
FitOfficial 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is my shocked face.

2
rapsheet1mile 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can hear my 6th grade teacher telling you to put am exclamation there. "But that's not the point," you say. Well then she'll just have to dock you a point.

3
FitOfficial 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol apparently you and I went to 6th grade together

6
biden_didnt_win 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to listen to Hannity. For like 3 months. In 2002. That was plenty.

5
BofaDeez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hannity and Tucker are both faggots and each one of you that still watch evening Fox lineup are CUCKED FAGGOTS. After ya'll manage to get the cum out your eyes learn what a grifter is and turn off cuck news.

5
Taste_the_red_pill_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

I quit this asshole many years ago. With The_donald I was able to get everything a week ahead and ten times more details then him or Rush. Same goes now for patriots.win

5
ExileOnRedditStreet 5 points ago +6 / -1

HUGE faggot

1
Georgieman 1 point ago +1 / -0

UGE

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Schwungle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Isn't that the whole point of the maga movement? That these old state felating gop fucks don't represent us?

4
FORMERCHILDSTAR 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hannity is so damb annoying. His guests get to talk for three minutes, he speaks for 15.

4
_MrG_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm glad you figured this out fren. People are going to give you shit but we all wake up at our own speed. The CIA has mlbeen buying everyone off on TV and radio for years.. Wait till you find out about Tucker...

4
scott31337 4 points ago +4 / -0

Have you realized yet your text messages aren’t safe?

4
Ronpaulblican2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think he was trying to get the two senate seats in the sun column, the stolen election was definitely making it hard to get big turnout. Maybe that’s what he meant. Not that I watch him.

4
FreedomDeliveries 4 points ago +4 / -0

yea he's old and stuck in the ways of what he views things should be from 20+ years ago. has not realized the change in the left and the needed change in the right.

4
Slothboy 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a known fact.

He's also pro vaccine

4
rapsheet1mile 4 points ago +5 / -1

Isn't this faggot running around pretending to be Maga now?

4
based_trekkie 4 points ago +4 / -0

All you have to do is to just notice those lapels he wears

4
SonomaGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I haven’t listened to hannity in over 3 years. Dumped him after the tick tock bullshit about locking Hilary up.

War Room only in my household now.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Magazord2020 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here here. The Source.

3
trump4045 3 points ago +3 / -0

Always has been a grifting neocon. As is the network he works for.

3
mnguy12000 3 points ago +3 / -0

And the sun rises in the east.

3
hillaryprison 3 points ago +3 / -0

I stopped watching when he had Donna Brazille on his his show as if she were on his team. The lying cheatin flaming leftist on his show and he said nothing about the elephant in the room.

3
Dman82 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought this was known by everyone already. Hannity always sucked even before this a don't like engram either fox sucks except tucker and he is shady sometimes but he also seams to do more good than bad. Fox sucks

3
Congress_is_ISIS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there a link associated with this picture so I can do some digging?

3
J_Gault_2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does he mention in the letter that he practices MMA?