1734
Comments (147)
sorted by:
85
T_DforTrump2020 85 points ago +88 / -3

Nobody on the left had ANYTHING good to say about Kavanaugh. Why is this guy kissing her ass?

77
snuggs316 77 points ago +80 / -3

so it's clear that the argument against appointing her is for her rulings, not her skin color or her genitalia.

5
MasksAreChildAbuse 5 points ago +5 / -0

because the media and establishment will totally report it fairly that way... Yeah right.

Regardless the reason they will say it was sexism and racism and evil whatever.

How do we not understand the rules are made up by the establishment as they go along?

3
T_DforTrump2020 3 points ago +29 / -26

Soooo, tip toeing around a made up issue? Garbage.

54
snuggs316 54 points ago +64 / -10

at least hawley is attempting to get the issue out in public and keep this woman off the supremes. what are YOU doing this morning, other than whining in your cornflakes?

23
magaspif 23 points ago +25 / -2

some butthurt being summoned by your reasoning - I think you are right. He's trying to make it purely about the case and making sure he can't be called a racist. He simply understands the battlefield.

4
Granny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hawley doesn't do something for no reason, so it's interesting to figure out what he's doing.

He made a strong point of her spending a great deal of time meeting with him. I think that was the main point couched in all that flowery language. But what's the significance?

2
JesusWept 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's making her willingness to answer the standard she has set herself. Making it difficult for her not to give her rationale, which cannot be good.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +3 / -8
8
Sky_RPL 8 points ago +9 / -1

It kinda is

3
deleted 3 points ago +11 / -8
6
snuggs316 6 points ago +6 / -0

of course i don't have a dick...i'm an actual woman. an elder pede who is damn tired of the incessant whining and purity tests.

3
Montsta 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ahhh yes of course the classic PDW purity tests. Where ANY perceived action that is less than 100% pure MAGA gets you shunned. You could be the most active conservative fighter on this board but if you own a pair of Nike’s or wear Carhartt or drink BRCC and adios amigo!

2
Granny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pede, I guarantee you the incessant whining and purity tests virtually always come from shills.

4
rebuildingMyself 4 points ago +6 / -2

A lot of it reeks of FBI bait, tbh

3
deleted 3 points ago +8 / -5
3
commiedestroyer 3 points ago +4 / -1

or the “yOu fiRsT”

1
Thep1mp 1 point ago +4 / -3

It’s a reasonable question when someone starts telling people what they should do.

Plenty want others to do their heavy lifting and the MAGA movement is no different.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
2
dr_gonzo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Who says he's trying to keep this woman off the Supreme Court? I've been paying attention for more than 5 minutes, so understand that as a Republican, he may very well end up just rubber stamping her anyway.

You see, it used to be common for both parties to give a president their SCOTUS picks. Democrats abandoned that about 30 years ago, but Republicans desperately want to be loved by the Marxists who spit on them every day in the media, so they just behave like whipped dogs.

It's possible that's not the case with Hawley, but it sure as hell wouldn't be the first time.

0
Simple_Question 0 points ago +1 / -1

stop. playing. by. their. rules.

13
anewpatriot 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yup he absolutely is. He should have sprang this shit on her during the hearing. Wtf excuse can she come up with for handing lower sentences than the guidelines or recommended by the prosecutor? There is no excuse. This should sink her nomination.

4
Pickles76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe that was his point, he provided the facts so the public was aware, he also promoted the established candidness of their discussions, so she has to continue to be candid or we will see she's acting in bad faith. And regardless of her answer, it will not be supported by the majority of Americans because no matter her reasoning we don't support leniency for kid diddlers. So basically he's setting her up to find a good reason as to why she would be lenient, but it doesn't matter what her reasoning was, the majority of Americans will not agree.

5
Talon54 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly what I was thinking. Republicans are being way to civil to this unqualified "judge" who is nothing more than a radical leftist. It's way beyond time for the right to be just as hostile as the left in these hearings.

1
Granny 1 point ago +1 / -0

It might not be that simple. Have you ever seen a professional interrogator at work? I'm sure you have, tv and movies are loaded with them. They always start out all nicey-nice, then gradually put the pressure on.

It's good technique that works well and we all know this. It makes me wonder about so many people here who don't recognize it when they see it!!!

1
Talon54 1 point ago +1 / -0

The democrats start the character assassination with the first utterance and never let up. That is the tactic we must employ when dealing with them. The one difference is that the left provides plenty of ammunition and our elected Republican Senators and Representative patently ignore it in the name of fair play. This a fight for our country and fighting fair is how you lose.

2
TwitterIsTrash 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Why does he keep going on and on about how thoughtful and accomplished she is? Is he just lying to butter her up and make her more likely to expose herself?

3
JesusWept 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, he's making it hard for her not to give her legal opinions about child porn and whether it should be decriminalization, which could sink her if she does.

2
TP4bunghole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take a guess.

71
TheyLETyougrabit 71 points ago +71 / -0

reads child porn sentences

I totally thought something else.

50
Perhelion 50 points ago +50 / -0

Yeah it might read better like:

Hawley reads Judge’s sentencing on various child porn offenders.

19
Unicron3 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yeah. Was wondering where this was leading.

13
rebuildingMyself 13 points ago +13 / -0

Biden was disappointed when he read the headline

2
Pickles76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberals, Rino's, hollywierdos, big tech oligarchs, were disappointed when they read the headline.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

This! Reading her record of race-based leniency in sentencing for POC child abusers/sex-offenders is what I hope is going on there.

> Not reading from "My Two Daddies: Fisting Is Fun!" or "Let's Masturbate! (For Dummies.)"

"Journalists," LOLWTF. I liked it better when we had professionals doing this, now we've ended up having to do their job for them (since MSM has abandoned its job of telling the truth and uncovering hidden misdeeds.)

26
deleted 26 points ago +29 / -3
16
VarusSPQR 16 points ago +18 / -2

Correct. She will be overwhelmingly confirmed. Hawley will probably vote to confirm as well.

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
3
QLARP 3 points ago +5 / -2

She has 10 gop votes locked up lol

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Ponzo 0 points ago +1 / -1

she will be confirmed because she is a swamp judge, she was the judge for the pizzagate shooter trial

25
AnPrim 25 points ago +25 / -0

This is straight from Brave New World.

Mother will be a swear word, children will be sexualized by 5yo.

5
Meathe 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Mother is the name for god in the lips and hearts of little children."

I'll stick with William Makepeace Thackery on that one.

1
ShartMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man...

That's dark AF. Brave New World was not an instruction manual. However, I do find it humorous to refer to women as "very pneumatic".

2
AnPrim 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, yes, that always stuck with me, too.

I do think he was not just prophetic, but they used it as instructions...

22
sweeswee14 22 points ago +44 / -22

wtf, why doesn't he wash her feet while he's at it? fuck this pig bitch

49
Lelleck 49 points ago +53 / -4

It actually is a better way to get your point across. I do believe that he is strongly against her or anything childpron related, but screaming and throwing shit at her is actually something that I don’t want to see in politic related hearings.

He read those sentences very clearly and it is up to the listener to tune in in the coming days and to throw shit at reporters for not properly reporting and to push those topics.

Imagine how many people never heard about her sentences of childfuckers

2
TP4bunghole 2 points ago +2 / -0

He might be thinking that anything he says that is in the least bit hostile will be clipped and soundbited by the corporate media instantly as an "attack", and the rest of what he's saying will be ignored by the media.

7
xBigCoffinHunter 7 points ago +15 / -8

Perhaps the worst take I’ve seen in some time

8
27Sandino 8 points ago +10 / -2

nah it's weird

before i accuse you of being soft on pedophiles and why i ultimately won't vote for you, i'd like to congratulate you on your career and tell you how lovely you are...ok so about those pedophiles

1
Granny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like Columbo.

-18
sweeswee14 -18 points ago +6 / -24

fuck off, nobody asked you

15
Barbs 15 points ago +17 / -2

You posted in a public forum. That’s you asking directly.

-1
13FOX -1 points ago +2 / -3

In fairness babstein.....you really do love faggotry

-8
deleted -8 points ago +4 / -12
-10
sweeswee14 -10 points ago +4 / -14

I don't see a question mark anywhere in sight. Maybe you should fuck off, too.

11
Cthaat 11 points ago +13 / -2

Children resort to emotional outbursts like what you've displayed here. Grow up

-2
deleted -2 points ago +5 / -7
1
Cthaat 1 point ago +3 / -2

Good thing you're an adult... Oh, wait.

-10
sweeswee14 -10 points ago +3 / -13

blah blah blah...go fuck yourself, faggot

1
Cthaat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big words for a 4 year old. Let me know when you're done with your temper tantrum

6
xBigCoffinHunter 6 points ago +7 / -1

Do we need to explain how a forum works?

-8
sweeswee14 -8 points ago +4 / -12

Let me explain it to you...FUCK YOU

4
xBigCoffinHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whew…Not sure how I’ll recover from that one.

-6
sweeswee14 -6 points ago +1 / -7

You'll be fine. You seem the type that will take anything from anyone.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
charwoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I heard sounded like GEOTUS playing with his quarry before moving in for the kill.

I'll bet the bitch was not candid, was niggardly with her time, and not forthcoming with information requested by the Senator. ymmv

19
KAGBulge 19 points ago +19 / -0

Where’s sexual assault victims from decades ago?

-3
QLARP -3 points ago +3 / -6

Catholic church paid them off

13
Gizmo17 13 points ago +17 / -4

He’s a bitch. Looking forward to thoughtful answers?? We are talking about child porn! This guys a half a fag.

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
9
Slothboy 9 points ago +12 / -3

But he kisses her ass first and after.

2
deleted 2 points ago +8 / -6
9
Pedeberrycrunch 9 points ago +12 / -3

It's funny to see how graciously he absolutely slays her.

3
deleted 3 points ago +8 / -5
2
Basedsliceofwinning 2 points ago +4 / -2

I wanted to give you time to come up with a statement to these heinous allegations provided to you by the Democrat PR team.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
8
aqua27 8 points ago +8 / -0

Racist,racist , racist thats all your going to hear if you ask her a serious question

6
ravioli_king 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've heard the left's defense of this "these were cases where they received it and were busted for it."

idk what receiving was, maybe "hey bud I'm gonna send you someone totally of age and bam... nope minor." I look forward to hearing her answer to this line of questioning.

25
golfbrora 25 points ago +25 / -0

Find a couple of parents whose child was victimized by a pedophile who benefited from Jackson's leniency. Have them testify. Nomination sunk. If the Republicans don't follow this path, it's all Kabuki theater.

10
Perhelion 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don’t see why not since the Dems allowed someone to give testimony from a liar’s wretched hippocampus before Kavanaugh could speak.

4
Barbs 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Republicans only see her as a vehicle to get what they want in return for her confirmation. It’s already a done deal, now the question is how much will the GOP get for doing it?

Mitch is in total control here, and as soon as he said she’d be “treated better than the Republican nominees” he was stating loud and clear that the Republicans can be bought for the right price.

3
EvenG 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's such insane bullshit. If you're on the perp-end of a child porn investigation you've been under surveillance for some time, it's never because you received one file. The scum brought up on these charges display a pattern of sharing and procuring files for months before they get arrested. It takes time to build legitimate cases to if you don't want them thrown out of court on a technicality

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or what if you have videos of yourself when you're underaged with another underaged girl who consented, but that's technically CP.

Doesn't sound like that was the case here, but just spitballing I guess.

4
yep22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gonna preface this comment with I'm a lefty so you understand the significance. I can't believe I'm going to say this, I never thought I would ever say this, but Hawley is right.

Pedophiles don't belong anywhere near the government. The closest they should ever get is the police, jailhouse, court room, and the prison.

5
Basedsliceofwinning 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dang, a lefty here? Either way, as long as you aren't a weirdo about it, I welcome you.

And yeah, anybody who sees that video with nor editorializing priming will see that she can't be a judge anymore.

Not even 2 years for child rape? Fucking hell.

2
maga4liferealpatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

welcome lefty

3
whatafiasco 3 points ago +3 / -0

If this were a republican appointed judge, there would be non-stop media coverage of how your kids are in danger. They would also be beating on the doors of the Supreme court, and protesting in the streets. Activists would be confronting senators in the hallways, all with TV cameras rolling. There would crying children, shouting women, etc. There would be witnesses with emotional testimony on being exploited as children. The Republicans aren't even playing in the same ballpark as the Dems when it comes to confirmations.

2
TNVol 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously he's RAYYYYYYSSSSSSIIIST!! REEEEEEEE!!🤡🌍

2
progressing 2 points ago +2 / -0

my god so much shills here

2
deleted 2 points ago +6 / -4
2
Bramage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is he kissing her ass at the beginning????

2
remindmelater 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's probably more to this than those few cases....is this judge married, or is she gay?

12
sicarius 12 points ago +12 / -0

Funny enough the looniest of the far left crazies don't like her either, bc she's married to a white guy.

11
SHILL_DETECTOR 11 points ago +11 / -0

Every single time.

3
Basedsliceofwinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

The white guy is her beard I bet lmao.

1
roadrunner0 1 point ago +1 / -0

This link is virus infected VBS:Gamaredon-CM

1
fponick 1 point ago +2 / -1

I guess you didn’t notice this from 12 hours ago:

https://patriots.win/p/142BT9uHCO/just-in-hawley-confronts-jackson/c/

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is exactly why God commanded Moses and Aaron to destroy every last filthy Canaanite. What we are seeing today is their failure to fulfil His will.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
roadrunner0 1 point ago +1 / -0

This link is infected with VBS:Gamaredon-CM

1
BigE_123456 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not surprised at all with ANY nomination that ANY Demoncrat makes that those nominees are always condoning this EVIL, VILE, SICKNESS!

1
Blueanon85 1 point ago +2 / -1

Didn’t manchin put the nail in the coffin?

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think he's announced if he'll support her or not?

And even if he does say no, a few Republicans will support her, so she'll get through. R's are really bad at this kabuki theatre, and are really bad about voting the same as a team for a greater purpose.

1
ElbowDeepInIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any recommended punishment short of capital punishment is evil.

1
Greenhills 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only reason child abuse takes place is because were not executing people for that crime.

0
Donger-Lord2 0 points ago +2 / -2

What a faggot.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-5
BigMikesTurdTampon -5 points ago +1 / -6

When does Jackson start speaking?

-15
FuckCensorship9 -15 points ago +7 / -22

I don't care about her being soft on child porn, I don't think punishing child porn possession harshly is a great idea either.

That to me is a red herring useful only in a pragmatic and distastefully political way to marshal outrage against her appointment.

What worries me much more is her view of the US constitution and her support for CRT. And I would prefer this be focused on.

5
HumblePig 5 points ago +10 / -5

Agreed on all accounts.

Viewing CP is pretty fucked up and should be penalized, it creates a demand, but there is a meaningful difference between watching and doing, and currently the laws don't differentiate nearly enough. I'm not downplaying the watching either, it's like watching a murder vs. doing a murder; both severe, but one much worse than the other.

And as bad as kiddy fucking is, her open disdain for the constitution is the bigger danger. The entire point of the position is upholding the constitution.

2
Basedsliceofwinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

CP possession/viewers are 100% pedophiles. Think Larry Nassar. He raped all those girls, got cover for it from politicians, then they FINALLY got him on all those CP images on his computer.

Make no distinction between CP and pedophilia, as there is no meaningful difference.

Other than narrow counter-examples, like if a 17 year old boy has a video of himself with his consenting 17 year old gf (which is technically CP), they're all evil.

-6
FuckCensorship9 -6 points ago +1 / -7

/yawn.

1
Operation_RedWave 1 point ago +2 / -1

How long have you been on a sex offender registry?

-4
FuckCensorship9 -4 points ago +1 / -5

lol

1
Operation_RedWave 1 point ago +2 / -1

Being a sex offender is funny?

-4
FuckCensorship9 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Your willingness to give yourself over to nonsense is funny. Funny but also sad.

1
Operation_RedWave 1 point ago +2 / -1

Cool story pedo

0
SoggyWhitebread 0 points ago +11 / -11

so youre ok with with kid fuckers?? you sick fuck

-12
FuckCensorship9 -12 points ago +7 / -19

Nah, I'd like much harsher sentences for actual child abusers, actually, I'm just not that upset about people viewing something that they didn't personally do.

Beyond that quibble, this woman's real danger will be her role in further eroding the constitution and promoting CRT. So I want those real dangers to be addressed and to be the reason she is trashed. We have to confront the problems directly and using low hanging fruit to sidestep the real dangers won't do that.

2
Cannot_stop_winning 2 points ago +9 / -7

Yea. You’re a sick fuck.

Pretending like viewing and perpetuating the sale of and creation of torturing children mentally and physically for the viewing pleasure of the most vile of degenerates isn’t that big of a deal and not abuse is the most retarded thing I’ve read in a long time.

I don’t even care to hear your response, take a long walk off a short pier. I hope to god you never have children.

3
FormerGraveheart 3 points ago +7 / -4

Sir, are you aware that child porn can be planted on people? Political enemies, say?

3
Cannot_stop_winning 3 points ago +3 / -0

And its very easy to prove it was planted... Any half-way decent cyber forensics expert can make the case it was planted (if it was)

Next CP defender, please come on down and shine a light on yourselves here!

1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha, as though the FBI wouldn't be able to get past that hurdle.

3
Cobalty2004 3 points ago +4 / -1

Don’t people get longer sentences for cp than murder?

Our system is fucked up.

Fix it by just killing all pedos.

2
Cannot_stop_winning 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, watching the video posted here, that statement doesn’t seem true at all. Nobody in any of the 7 instances was given more than 80 months in prison.

Every instance of murder will land you more time than that.

I do agree on a pedo purge tho

0
ConvertedDemocrat 0 points ago +5 / -5

With that logic, you might as well condemn anyone whose ever seen a horror/murder film as serial killers.

4
Observe95 4 points ago +6 / -2

You are comparing watching a fictional movie to watching children getting raped on screen.?!

0
ConvertedDemocrat 0 points ago +2 / -2

It’s literally pixels on a screen. Weather the act is real or not, the message sent is the same in both situations when you make the comparison. I’m not advocating for either one, I’m just pointing out the flaws in your logic.

2
Basedsliceofwinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

Username ConvertedDemocrat is pro-child porn. Big fucking surprise.

Go back to your original party, we don't want you here.

2
Observe95 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, it is not just pixels when dealing with children getting raped on screen. The act is not fake. The message is also not the same. It is disturbing that you think this.

2
Cannot_stop_winning 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one in a film is actually murdered.

You wanna make the case that viewing and owning actual snuff films should be treated similarly to owning and viewing CP, I don’t see an issue here and would agree.

Next!

-6
FuckCensorship9 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Lol, too late.

2
Redditcensorsyouandi 2 points ago +8 / -6

Come on, if someone us depraved enough to be viewing and hoarding cp, what do you think the inevitable next step is? What do you think they fantasize about when they are sitting on a park bench watching other peoples kids play?

Having a hoard of cp should get you deported and your citizenship revoked.

That's being nice too, personally I think it should be free helicopter rides for every one of them

Edit: Really? Downvoted for saying pedos need need helicopter rides? Weird...

-7
FuckCensorship9 -7 points ago +5 / -12
  1. No, I doubt that more than a small minority of the people who view cp would act on it.

  2. Again, the real point is not about cp, it's about what the supreme court actually does. The supreme court is not concerned with child pornography. It's probably only dealt with cp related cases once or twice in its entire history. Its role is to uphold the constitution and our rights. Even if we grant that her stance on cp is bad - which I don't, it's not nearly as relevant to why she shouldn't be a supreme court candidate as her views on the constitution and society/right-destroying legal ideologies like CRT. I want the real problems addressed, not low hanging fruit used out of convenience.

2
Dat_Patriot_Dude 2 points ago +7 / -5

Tell me you're a kiddy fucker without telling me you fuck children. You are a sick individual.

-1
Observe95 -1 points ago +3 / -4

No, I doubt that more than a small minority of the people who view cp would act on it.

Tell me you watch child pornography without telling me you watch CP.

Even if we grant that her stance on cp is bad - which I don't,

I want the real problems addressed, not low hanging fruit used out of convenience.

People like you watching creates more demand for the rape of children.

Allowing people to freely abuse children destroys a society.

-5
FuckCensorship9 -5 points ago +3 / -8

Wrong on all accounts, but nice try just.making stuff up.

Meanwhile, back in reality, people can disagree with you without being guilty of whatever it is you're disagreeing about.

There has never been total agreement, and never will be total agreement, about the severity of this or that crime and how it should be punished, and that's not because of the guilty.