1845
Comments (108)
sorted by:
84
Thelongrun 84 points ago +85 / -1

There were no working cameras at the Pentagon on 9/11, either, by golly.

45
Ex-libtard 45 points ago +46 / -1

I believe it. I've worked with people who work in government.

They're retarded top to bottom.

Like dog shit dumb.

20
PewPew_ThaDuK 20 points ago +20 / -0

Specially when you consider how NYC is right now

6
User_X 6 points ago +7 / -1

Pentagon on 9/11, Epstein's Cell, and now the NY subway shooter. The federal govt either sucks at security or they are lying.

Right now the public has better cameras than the govt. Catching pelosi in a salon without a mask, ballot counters on election night pulling ballots from under tables rescanning them multiple times, and even Juicy Smullet hate criming himself.

14
Thelongrun 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's almost as if they are intentionally dumb.

14
DeadOverRed 14 points ago +14 / -0

In a world where the rule is "be dumb or get fired . . . "

5
Thelongrun 5 points ago +5 / -0

So true. Been there.

4
Truglow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agree. They are dog shit dumb.

15
spezisacuckold 15 points ago +15 / -0

There were no cameras when Epstein definitely didn't kill himself.

7
Thelongrun 7 points ago +7 / -0

I do think the sick, evil Elite believe most of the population has the IQ of a freshly laid turd.

6
Resist_and_Bite 6 points ago +6 / -0

Are they wrong?

4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was almost going to add, 'And they're not wrong...' But you did it for me... I'm always amazed by how few genuinely bright people there are in this world.

5
FreeFlorida 5 points ago +5 / -0

and his buddy too same shit its like they think we are just a bunch of fucking idiots and we wont notice

5
TommyJarvis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or in Epsteins cell

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe he wasn't even in his cell. Just sayin'. Literally nothing to film here, folks.

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
6
Brellin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't forget that the area that got hit was the area that had all the paperwork and accounting for trying to figure out where 2 trillion dollars in missing cash ended up, as reported by iirc Donald Rumsfeld literally the day before 9/11.

5
PewPew_ThaDuK 5 points ago +7 / -2

People who were inside the Pentagon and were struck have severe burn marks from the airplane fuel. Def not a missile

4
anatidaephobia 4 points ago +6 / -2

And WTC7 they had planned to take down with the twin towers, but the plane never arrived. Plane 93 perhaps, where passengers disrupted the globalists plans. 🤡

3
GrayManNumber333 3 points ago +3 / -0

By hook or by crook.

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +6 / -3

Yes, I have seen that brief bit of footage from the one working CCTV camera. Obviously very heavily edited and wilfully distorted.

You're 100% right - it was a missile.

No plane wreckage at all. Not a single bag. Nothing.

You do know what part of the Pentagon it hit, don't you? The Accounting/Financial Department. The same Dept where they 'discovered' that trillions of dollars had 'gone missing'. Rumsfield announced the missing trillions on national TV on 10th Sept, the very day before the 'terrorist' strikes.

3
Brellin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was it Cheney? I thought it was Rumsfeld that announced it.

4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

My wrong. It was Rumsfield.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +3 / -1

There was a gaping hole in the building, engine debris, but not much else.

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +3 / -1

Please watch this. Look at the hole in the Pentagon Building wall.

That wasn't made by a plane - it was made by a missile.

Leaked Video of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 911:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1t92pj

5
anotherthing 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy crap, that video is bad. The video he shows of the small hole is the hole from the courtyard area of the Pentagon, not the exterior face of the Pentagon that was actually the impact site.

Nothing else in that video matters after seeing that. You search "Pentagon impact site 9/11" on any search engine and you'll get hundreds of pictures of the front of the building, the actual place where the plane hit. The guy that made that video can't credibly tell me that he'd done a bunch of research and he legitimately didn't know the difference between the front of the building and the interior courtyard side.

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry, it was the first one I could grab. I was in a rush. Should I delete it? Dang.

3
anotherthing 3 points ago +3 / -0

The big problem I have with the whole missile thing, other than shooting it over a major city with lots of witnesses, is that there is video from a camera where one frame captured a image of the front of the plane. Now, if you know anything about security cameras, especially back then when the footage was stored on video tape, you'll know they have a shit frame rate. The one thing they'd be bad at is capturing something moving really fast - like a passenger liner traveling several hundred MPH. If you've got a 15fps security camera, which was pretty good at that time, that plane will travel around 40ft every frame captured. If it's 10 frames a second, we're talking about 60ft every frame. 10 frames per second for a parking lot, even at the Pentagon, is probably fine because you're expecting to capture cars moving around or people walking.

Another problem is, look at the front of the building after the news crews got there. Notice the roof. One side detached and collapsed on the floors below it. Typically, an explosion will travel in any direction it's possible to travel, like the muzzle flash of a gun. The pressure is distributed within whatever boundaries it can as uniformly as it can. If you look at the damage on the front, you can still the diagonal path that was taken by something and part of it managed to travel through all those buildings and punched a hole in the far side. Missiles don't do that. It's way more likely that it was a passenger plane just because of the "punching" factor there. Furthermore, look at the very wide burnt areas on the front and that big orange fireball. That's incendiary, like jet fuel, as opposed to a munitions explosion where you're going for maximum pressure. Looking at the front of the building, there was fire burning on the outside of the building 14 window lengths from where the impact hit.

It's one of those situations where if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck. The biggest problem I have with all these "theories" is that they allow people to stop asking questions, like "How come the FBI or CIA didn't question why 20+ Saudis came in to America around the same time, went to the same flight school in Florida at the same time, and wanted to know how to fly a plane but didn't want to know how to land a plane?" I think it's pretty clear that they probably did know about it, or someone in those agencies did. After all, ECHELON was already active at that time. All the technology to do the Patriot Act was funded and developed under Clinton. The Patriot Act was just making a lot of it official.

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

RARE Footage Pentagon 9 11 Surveillance Camera Video Impact Crash 9-11:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUNngyhZQrk

2
Patriot_Dave 2 points ago +2 / -0

But the toll booth video! We dont know why walmart has more cameras than the pentagon! Bigot!

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's all a sick joke. And they're still in control. Dictating a false reality. When will they fall? Ever?

30
Patriot4evr 30 points ago +30 / -0

McAfee and Epstein didn’t kill themselves

3
kompromatdotwin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hold up! Do you mean that the building in Miami just didn't suddenly combust?

But hey, It's a good thing the IDF sent their folks over who somehow specialize in buildings that combust spontaneously (which doesn't happen and hasn't happened since).

40TB gone! or is it?

26
Hattricia 26 points ago +28 / -2

No working cameras = It was fucking planned!!

21
BelfordBob 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yeah, not buying no working cameras. There are cameras all over inside and outside every freaking station, and in NY post 9/11; every home and little shop on the street has them too.

6
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +6 / -0

More likely that the FBI confiscated and destroyed the footage and ordered the "no working cameras" narrative.

18
tonkabodhi 18 points ago +18 / -0

Try putting a Biden did that sticker up in there. See what happens

7
HildawgsHalitosis 7 points ago +8 / -1

Six cameras in full 4k

12
Joshua2001 12 points ago +12 / -0

It is odd how that always happens. How many cameras does a subway station have? All of them were broken? How long were they broken? Are all the cameras broken at the other subway stations?

5
anatidaephobia 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reminds me of a post on the conspiracy sub few years ago, someone had found a whole bunch of ip cameras owned by the US government, or one of the three letter agencies, hundreds of them, all listed in a post, all publicly exposed to the internet with no password.

Soon as you connected to one, you'd see how they where placed, often by a lamp post or some hidden place, them aimed to windows of peoples homes as if they where spying on people. All cameras where 4k, had some overkill objective that allowed great zoom, and the ability to rotate in all directions.

Found the model of a few of them, mostly canon $2000-$3000 a piece, and that's the price before the Biden inflation and the supply shortage. Today's price would probably be $10 000 per camera, all paid with your tax dollars. Tho if all you want is a simple surveillance camera, you'll get a 1080p one for $50, with cloud uploads and archive.

2
DeuteronomyTwentyone 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember this!

2
anatidaephobia 2 points ago +2 / -0

I spent days watching those cameras, then they found the post and suddenly within ours they had set passwords on them all. Think I found more as well, the OP described how to find them through a Goolag search, because Goolag often index stuff it's not supposed to index. 🤡

I think, if you goolag search somethnig like "webui <camera brand>" and select pictures you'll see what the title for the camera ui looks like. Then do a goolag title search for that exact title. And bam, Goolag will show every camera in the world that's connected with a public ip adress.

2
Lord_Kek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Scroogle hacking is no longer as useful. They only give that data to the NSA now.

8
FucKamala 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's always so fucking laughably predictable

7
Zxc26 7 points ago +7 / -0

He was super ready and killed nobody, it's fake or guy had performance anxiety.

2
Jefferson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or a body was exfiltrated undetected.

7
anon09 7 points ago +9 / -2

"smoke canister commonly bought online", this wasn't an agent or a sleeper cell folks, it was just a guy who commonly bought everything online. and he was mumbling to himself, not to his supervisor.

3
sordfysh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bought commonly online at that place everyone buys online stuff.

No. Not the darkweb. It's like the darkweb, but it's used only by white supremacists. You won't know about it unless you're a white supremacist. But trust us, it's a place where people commonly buy bombs and shit.

6
captainmundane 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mumbling to "himself"...

3
__bryan 3 points ago +4 / -1

aloha snack bar!

Merry Christmas ya filthy animals!

3
AmannamedRJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crazy people on TV mumble to themselves.

Somebody resolute enough to perform a terrorist attack probably wouldn't. No working cameras is also pretty suspect.

Anybody with footage of this guy needs to release it online BEFORE giving it to the police. The police would just disappear it, because Its safe to assume gay ops are in effect.

6
Sylvester1212 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mumbling or talking into an earpiece?

6
clueless_expert 6 points ago +6 / -0

"...commonly bought online."

Riiiggghhht. We should demand a law is passed to prevent everyday people from buying gas canisters from Amazon.

3
sordfysh 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah. That phrase usually means, "we don't know anything about this, but we want this guy to sound like a home-grown terrorist."

If it's commonly bought online, surely someone can show me where it's bought online. But they don't even know what kind of gas/flash grenade he used.

Journalists gonna journalist. They will surely fact check the shit they hear from the FBI once they retire, right? No point doing a job that you aren't paid to do.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://enolagaye.com/airsoft/

Are you dumb?

My god it was the first link for the first search I made. You couldn't even bother to do that yourself?

1
sordfysh 1 point ago +1 / -0

So that's where people "commonly" buy smoke grenades?

I don't see many reviews.

It looks like those are reliable, but are you vouching for their quality? I don't know anyone who has bought smoke grenades online.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can buy smoke grenades that are commonly used for airsoft, you dipshit.

4
NvJohansson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Released a smoke canister commonly bought online.

I'm surprised they're starting this out with the Tim McVay thing again, because the guy doesn't seem to be white since we didn't see his face yet nor were there any reeee's of white supremacy in the news.

4
basedboston 4 points ago +4 / -0

Disney's news channel

4
PewPew_ThaDuK 4 points ago +4 / -0

I bet he was a fed

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

There were no working cameras in Epstein's cell, or his pal's in France.

3
fartglove 3 points ago +3 / -0

So then check the cameras at the exit where the person left. How many exits from that station? None in train? (Chicago has them), none at the station?, none at the exits? Which video shows the guy shooting?

3
EllisDee25 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mumbling the Islamic prayer.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
__bryan 3 points ago +4 / -1

mumbling to himself = aloha snack bar

3
NinjaFish 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same system that covered Epstein’s prison cell?

2
ElectronicSlurm69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cameras are racist so criminals broke them.

2
Farage_massage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jesus fucking Christ - they’re not even trying anymore😂😂😂

2
LiveFreeOrDieYoung 2 points ago +2 / -0

No working cameras? Don’t give a fuck then.

2
Kekintosh2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh another impossible anomaly

2
TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think what we're learning is that cameras fail so much that there's no reason to have them. Its time we get rid of all these cameras.

2
109Bars 2 points ago +2 / -0

Buuuuullllllshit.

2
Multiple_Muppets 2 points ago +2 / -0

well, they were working, but then you would have seen the patsy being setup by his handlers and that would have perhaps led you once again to the FBI behind the whole thing... can't have that... cameras weren't working, aww shucks, next time they'll work, we promise!

2
MAGAmanforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

So instead of just saying they need the video for evidence, they just lie, that is either to protect a cover-up or write their own narrative.

2
Brellin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly I'd believe there being no working cameras wasn't a glow-op but instead just the natural state of things. Have you SEEN a new york city subway? They're fucking awful.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol @ people in this thread going 'crazy people only mumble to themselves on TV!'.

Yeah no, they really do that shit.

This site is so utterly out of touch with reality lol.

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many times have we heard that? I'm starting to think the cameras are just for you and me.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
ghettometal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mumbling = Possible Jihad Prayer

1
TGNX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either it's unsurprising because NYC is a shithole, or it's unsurprising because the Feds didn't want to be caught on camera.

1
BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

"commonly bought online"

Translation: they're coming for gas masks

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Wintergreen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI probably found a violent schizo and gave him weapons then turned him loose on the subway. They confiscated the camera footage because their handler was recorded coaching him beforehand.

1
pnwpatriot97 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love how they just mention that shit...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
dagoat4l 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fbi and Cia know how to kill cameras.

1
Seruna_Kanus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Course they put focus on the canister and not the mask.

Then again, anyone that wants a smoke bomb can figure out how to make a smoke bomb.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol when I mentioned this in the other thread everyone got angry at me, because central to their belief that the FBI 'armed him' was the idea that a homemade pyrotechnic was an utterly impossible arcane concept and if you explain that you learned this shit in school chemistry class, you're "LARPing".

1
ParticleCannon 1 point ago +1 / -0

> would rather admit that all their cameras are fake instead of actually trying to deter or prosecute criminal activity (fed-op notwithstanding)

Bold move, Cotton.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dimedog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bc he is a fed or black or both

1
Ez_mac 1 point ago +1 / -0

1 day after Biden’s ghost gun regulation speech

1
Badradness 1 point ago +1 / -0

FBI terrorists at it again. Faggots

1
FreeFlorida 1 point ago +1 / -0

the cameras worked but the skin color of the shooter was so dark you couldn't see a thing

1
Billbuttlickerr 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you still live in shitty NYC you deserve whatever you get. Fuck off.

1
GrayManNumber333 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mumbling to himself…

1
NancyPelosisBoozeBin 1 point ago +1 / -0

He wasnt talking to himself.... The FBI wanted him to do a mic check...

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

No working cameras because the perpatrator wasn't white?