Oh even better, if you think about it around half of that 13% can presumably be excluded because they're elderly, young children, or females who are statistically less likely to commit a violent crime than males. So in reality you have about 6-7% of the population committing 80% of the violent crimes in our country. But that's rayciss!
Less than that. That number assumes that A: Males make up about 50% of the population. Who knows if this is true, considering how many are murdered by their gang rivals, and B: All males are equally likely to murder. This likely isn't the case, as children under 13 or so, and probably males over 50 are less likely to murder, so it's probably more like 3-4%.
And a good chunk of them are just good people living their lives... There's probably much less than 1% of the population responsible for all of the murders.
Like the "bowl of Skittles" thing: You could have 100 Skittles in a bowl, 99% are just fine- but there is one Skittle that is poisoned. Only the most attention-starved social-media "influencer" type would dare eat one of those Skittles at random. The average logical person would not risk a 1% chance of painful demise, even for a sizable amount of money. These days, one might find more people than usual who are desperate/shallow enough to take that sort of risk- but those are not "average logical people."
As I said recently, I am turning down business travel to DNC Sanctuary Cities that encourage violence/crime by being lenient with illegal immigrant/POC crime. Maybe there is a 1% chance of getting carjacked/shot/mugged/curb-stomped, but that is 1% more than I am going to risk. I would be at higher risk than the typical traveler, as I would be in charge of expensive specialized equipment (much of it not my own.) Often, large clubs/concert venues are located in a high-crime and/or low-rent area of town where it unsafe for anyone on the best days.
> Example: the Staples Center in LA (now the "Crypto.com Arena") is downtown, but that's not a good thing. The last time I was there 10 years ago, there was a huge Skid Row of a homeless camp a block or so away. Even then, all the "tourist areas" were crawling with homeless people and aggressive panhandlers. After seeing the more-recent crime and homeless issues, I know I made the right decision getting out of LA for good. Now that Sanctuary Cities are a trend with similar soft-on-crime problems, I am writing off a lot of cities as "no-go zones."
Sounds like Seattle, caught a Hawks game I think the 2018 season (used to catch one every year) The town was so depraved from just the year prior, it was actually frightening to even me, and been going there my whole life, lived there at one point. You didn’t just have a 1% chance of something crazy happening, it was 5% at minimum just during the day in ‘18. The only time I’ve ever been back was 2020 XFL game and I took the train that drops you right at the stadium, I was way to terrified to walk any further, not to sound like a pussy, but keep in mind I’m with my wife for these games and we haven’t been back since, I’m not risking it with her, don’t really care what happens to me.
Black females are far more likely to murder than black males. They're actually a leading cause of death for black people, up there with heart disease and cancer. The CDC doesn't list the figures in their deaths and mortality stats because it doesn't consider unborn children to be alive. They should absolutely be directed to include them.
Well, you can't compare only the able adult males of the minority population against all members of the rest of the population. You'd need to decrease the rest of the population by the same ratio which means it comes out exactly the same as before.
Representation only. So anyone seen on camera. This is propaganda. The people who aren't seen serve no purpose in terms of the propagandizing. It's all about appearance with these monsters.
Bad question. There is no "SHOULD". A better question is "what proportion of the violent crime WOULD you expect if that group acted like every other group?"
They definitely should. Less chances for leftist indoctrination to ever take hold if kids could see the world for what it is instead of being abused/groomed.
these people are targeting children in fucking pre-k. trying to carve a wedge in between them and their parents in order to groom a new breed of activists and shit disturbers to try and continue bringing down what we have long established as a civil society
Homeschool parent here. Math books are awful. They are full of pictures and colors and extra words. Go back and look at an 1800’s math book. It’s a quick explanation, no pictures and then the equations. This is what a good math textbook should be. Too many colors and pictures and words on a page confuses the brain and thus makes focusing difficult. And that is the crux of this entire issue: the publishers do not want the students to learn mathematics but to hate it and focus on their true agenda - dumbing down of the population so they can be controlled.
Old saxon books (1st and 2nd editions) are good. Rays arithmetic can be found for free online. Rod and Staff a Mennonite publication may also be a good option though it doesn’t go into the higher maths. I use singapore primary for elementary but it has some drawbacks (common core creeps in).
You’re exactly right. I teach my son the math because the books are horrible at explaining it. They seem more concerned with busy work and confusing kids than teaching them.
this started with the feminization of schools. Busy work is right. public schools are instructed to give students credit for trying, and for organization and what not in math/science classes. That is how girls caught up to boys in grades/scores in math/science. Girls didnt perform better, the curriculum was changed such that now boys do worse.
Up to about the start of puberty, kids have very little critical thinking ability but incredible capacity to do things by rote memory and processing. They may not know what it means or why it is useful, but they can churn out an answer. When they begin to question everything, that's when it is appropriate to teach the conceptual and critical thinking side.
Making reading, writing, and basic math automatic are probably the biggest things you can do. Patterns, tips, and tricks are great. Teaching them 5 different abstract methods to think about solving a problem, early on, and forcing them to use them like common core does, just confuses them. Given enough exposure, they begin to develop their own methods and strategies that work for them. That's how mastery and understanding is eventually achieved.
Exactly. Young kids love memorizing and should memorize all math facts. If this is done a child then can go directly to fifth grade math. Understanding comes later but having the base of math facts then makes math less difficult and enjoyable and ultimately the student will excel.
The examples in article don't even relate to anything a child would need or want to do. So why would children even use the algebra for? CRT teachers are idiots.
I'm old enough now that I remember some of that. You're right, very few pictures in the older stuff.
I remember a major transition in high school with curriculum during the mid 90s. New courses and books introduced. At the time I thought the new stuff was pretty slick because it had nice colors and looked more modern. It also didn't smell and wasn't held together by tape on the spine.
I homeschooled my high school youngest during the Covid shutdowns.
He's a visual learner. He would have failed utterly with a "words only" approach. The specific topic that helped hugely with pictures were Geometry and Biology.
A good chunk of math was developed with geometry - aka pictures. Go look at the original competing theories of Calculus for a good example.
Don't let printing limitations from the 19th century stop your visual learners from getting a good education
Besides geometry, the majority of advanced math needs to be done abstractly without visual aides. It's better to push students to learn abstract mathematical reasoning than to limit them with only simple math that can be shown visually.
To each their own, but it's hard to imagine programming or doing advanced calculus while still relying on visual aides. For what it's worth, I used to compete in math competitions as a middle and high school student and not one competitor there used visuals.
To each their own, but it's hard to imagine programming or doing advanced calculus
I did it all the time early on in my engineering career. When I'm presenting calculus based results I usually present them graphically as well as the equations.
See "Labview" for a professionally used graphical programming language. Super fast prototyping.
Plotting a function, understanding minimums and maximums, inversion points, slope, change in slope, and areas under a curve all seem like visually relatable concepts. Even when you move on to applications like statistics and physics, graphical representation is often very illuminating.
If I were going to introduce a student to the normal distribution, I would show it on a graph before I even talked about the cumulative distribution and probability density functions that define it.
Things like set theory, information theory, signal analysis/processing, topologies, and linear algebra can be very visual. I find it hard to think of any mathematics where visual representations like a graph, chart, or diagram are not routinely used to explain the concepts being studied.
I agree, the colors do tend to distract younger students, and older ones too, from the primary lessons in math.
At higher levels, like calculus 1, statistics and differential equations, focusing on equations and applications of identities is imperative; a lot of books have way too make visualizations which many not even help with learning in anyway, they make lessons longer than they have to be. Solving a variety of problems, to show how to logically get to an answer helps waaaay more. And, above calc 1, 2 & 3, visuals help, but only if being used to do something like a double or triple integral for area or volume, to see how integrals may be used to define objects, or using something like a derivative to see instantaneous rate of something.
Going through the laws and deducing are the best methods, I think.
That first example with the polynomial fit line... Holy shit. The writers realllllllly hate Republicans to have to squeeze that BS in there. Why is there no example of approximating a line to the number of deaths attributed to Chairman Mao?
I dont think that is the goal. The elites need things to function as much as anyone. Having power is pointless if you live in a shithole. They still need someone to design all their fancy luxury stuff, build their mansions, and keep the logistics going that make it so they never have to want for anything. It is not necessary to make people actually stupid, they just need to be controllable. This CRT stuff, the trans agenda, it is often compared to 1984 when they try to get him to say that 2+2 = 5. They dont actually need him to do bad math, they just want him to submit to that most obvious and basic level. In day to day operations they need people like him to do their work competently. Most of this stuff we are facing now is a means to an end. They dont want stupid kids, they want controllable kids. If anything they would try to make people stupid short term but the long term plan isnt common stupidity. Very smart people can be controlled if they are sufficiently brainwashed and affected by the right influences. Its the same thing as all the anti racist agenda, these are marxists. They create demand for change by creating chaos, then offering communism as the solution. Destabilizing race relations is how they accomplish the end goal. In the end they want no identities, outside of whatever group "the party" says to identify with, and no individualism.
In their utopian fantasy they have a still very functional society and all of the power condensed down to them by the end. Any breakdown is meant to be temporary.
In contrast, how come we have never seen or ever will a scenario like this in a textbook.
If the cycle rate of GI Joe's weapon is 600rds/minute and Joe averages a 3 second mag change, effectively how many rds could Joe send downrange assuming 30rd mags? 😃
Imagine "Them" getting their panties in a bunch over this.
Some people in those positions have even been caught on video now saying that exact thing and also that they can always simply shift the language of it to temporarily get around these laws/bans....
I guess they never thought that the governor would have a team actually go through the textbooks word by word. Every red state needs to do this because I guarantee you they simply trust the textbook companies broadly....
“Ju’Wan the Jogger can carry 5 boxes of Jordans. Ju’Wan lives 3 miles away from Foot Locker. How many trips would Ju’Wan need to make to fully loot in an hour if Ju’Wan can jog 4 MPH?”
I'm very sick and tired of the Democrats fostering a culture of lies in America. I don't like where the US is going culturally from their warping values. On my personal level I now fight back where I can, dealing with local corruption.
But sticking Leftist propaganda lies into kids' textbooks certainly crosses the line. I live in the northern Cal Bay Area and the leftist newspapers have been painting the DeSantis action as Republican lies. We need to take on all the Marxist Democrats and drive them into the sea.
I've heard of word problems, sure but no need to use "diverse" names like Angelou and Shaniquah. Bob has 5 candy bars and Sally has 10... no need to inject a "black sounding name" or a "Latinx gender-neutral name"
If George has 5 lbs of ground beef and Tina has 10, how much global warming is there when we apply the standard deviation of implicit racial bias and gendernormativity?
“If half of all reported crimes occur in 13.2% out of a total population of 385,000,000, how many potential criminals are there in that total population?”
I remember that "implicit bias" test. It took me about five minutes to realize that it's a video game.
It teaches you a control scheme, and once you have the muscle memory for it down, it flips the controls and then tells you you're racist because your speed and accuracy diminished due to your muscle memory being confused. Every gamer has experienced this trick, where something in a game screws with how your controls work and you panic.
So I did what I do in any boss fight I lose. I reloaded and tried again. And again. And again, until I'd gotten myself used to the switching controls. In the span of about an hour, I completely eliminated my "implicit bias" and undid a lifetime of racism, according to the test's logic.
As if the use of sexual abuse wasn’t bad enough, in the example given, they’re referencing Maya Angelou’s childhood specifically. So, a trip to Wikipedia and you don’t need to know how to do the actual math, because you know what the right answer should be.
DeSantis is 100% right here. There are a million topics one can cover for statistics and graphs, and the one they choose just so happens to be a very divisive topic.
People do learn best in different ways. You’re still wrong for trying to defend these people. There is no excuse for any of this. Stating your degree and the classes you took is a leftist tactic. It’s irrelevant. I’d bet good money I’m better at math than you and you have never heard me brag about it.
Growing up I NEVER saw a multiple choice answer for a math test like their example where the 'story' has a missing word helps them guess the correct choice. That has to be the STUPIDEST way to teach math I've ever seen.
Unfortunately while children can choose their own genders as hormone blockers, they still cannot choose their own learning style. It’s one size fits all at schools, and Algebra stories are going to hold back more kids than they help.
They should use FBI crime statistics in math class
So, if you have a group who makes up 13% of the population, what proportion of the violent crime SHOULD that group make up?
13% if you live in Florida. Anywhere west of Amarillo the answer is 75% or more.
Oh even better, if you think about it around half of that 13% can presumably be excluded because they're elderly, young children, or females who are statistically less likely to commit a violent crime than males. So in reality you have about 6-7% of the population committing 80% of the violent crimes in our country. But that's rayciss!
Less than that. That number assumes that A: Males make up about 50% of the population. Who knows if this is true, considering how many are murdered by their gang rivals, and B: All males are equally likely to murder. This likely isn't the case, as children under 13 or so, and probably males over 50 are less likely to murder, so it's probably more like 3-4%.
Most violent crime is committed by a small group of people inside most demographics. Some people would call these killing machines "super predators".
I was under the impression that there were 2x as many females as males.
Black women just weigh twice as much as black men.
nah they are just twice as important! /s
You misspelt twice the size.
Also: males are more likely to be arrested/imprisoned, so some of the 3-4% will be in jail (where even there, some will continue to kill people.)
And a good chunk of them are just good people living their lives... There's probably much less than 1% of the population responsible for all of the murders.
Like the "bowl of Skittles" thing: You could have 100 Skittles in a bowl, 99% are just fine- but there is one Skittle that is poisoned. Only the most attention-starved social-media "influencer" type would dare eat one of those Skittles at random. The average logical person would not risk a 1% chance of painful demise, even for a sizable amount of money. These days, one might find more people than usual who are desperate/shallow enough to take that sort of risk- but those are not "average logical people."
As I said recently, I am turning down business travel to DNC Sanctuary Cities that encourage violence/crime by being lenient with illegal immigrant/POC crime. Maybe there is a 1% chance of getting carjacked/shot/mugged/curb-stomped, but that is 1% more than I am going to risk. I would be at higher risk than the typical traveler, as I would be in charge of expensive specialized equipment (much of it not my own.) Often, large clubs/concert venues are located in a high-crime and/or low-rent area of town where it unsafe for anyone on the best days.
> Example: the Staples Center in LA (now the "Crypto.com Arena") is downtown, but that's not a good thing. The last time I was there 10 years ago, there was a huge Skid Row of a homeless camp a block or so away. Even then, all the "tourist areas" were crawling with homeless people and aggressive panhandlers. After seeing the more-recent crime and homeless issues, I know I made the right decision getting out of LA for good. Now that Sanctuary Cities are a trend with similar soft-on-crime problems, I am writing off a lot of cities as "no-go zones."
Sounds like Seattle, caught a Hawks game I think the 2018 season (used to catch one every year) The town was so depraved from just the year prior, it was actually frightening to even me, and been going there my whole life, lived there at one point. You didn’t just have a 1% chance of something crazy happening, it was 5% at minimum just during the day in ‘18. The only time I’ve ever been back was 2020 XFL game and I took the train that drops you right at the stadium, I was way to terrified to walk any further, not to sound like a pussy, but keep in mind I’m with my wife for these games and we haven’t been back since, I’m not risking it with her, don’t really care what happens to me.
Black females are far more likely to murder than black males. They're actually a leading cause of death for black people, up there with heart disease and cancer. The CDC doesn't list the figures in their deaths and mortality stats because it doesn't consider unborn children to be alive. They should absolutely be directed to include them.
Was confused for a bit. I take the Margaret Sanger approach, less vermin on welfare
That is the absolute truth.
I have said repeatedly if where I live could be walled off from two adjoining Democrat hellhole counties, all crime would dramatically drop.
Young kids? Those are usually the favorite target of black gangs to commit crimes since laws apply differently to kids.
Well, you can't compare only the able adult males of the minority population against all members of the rest of the population. You'd need to decrease the rest of the population by the same ratio which means it comes out exactly the same as before.
Question 2: If 3-5% of the population claims to be homosexual, what is the proper approximate representation of homosexual characters in media?
0%
Congratulations! You have graduated!
If 13% of the US population is black, how many of the 9 Supreme Court justices would you expect to be black? Bonus question: What's a woman?
I've not heard that approbation about the 3-5% being overrepresented, but they are overrepresented in that category too.
It's all fractal
At least 30%
Seems like it's closer to 50% at this point. 75% in advertising.
behind or in front of the camera?
Representation only. So anyone seen on camera. This is propaganda. The people who aren't seen serve no purpose in terms of the propagandizing. It's all about appearance with these monsters.
Yeah, but they love the the optics, so I'm guessing there's a shitton behind the camera as well
Bad question. There is no "SHOULD". A better question is "what proportion of the violent crime WOULD you expect if that group acted like every other group?"
0
Calculate the N coefficient and solve for dindu
What is wypeepo?
Show your work please.
13 = 52
Look at the big brains on Brad.
You, alright! I learned it by watching you!
Parents who know FBI statistics have children who know FBI statistics.
Flashback.
Now do 0.1 = 42
Rookie numbers. We gotta pump those numbers up.
58008 upsidedown = boobs
Work is racist and designed to subjugate minorities reeeeeee
Bigot.
I thought showing your work was racist 🤔
My favorite FBI statistic:
The poorest majority white zip code has fewer murders per capita than the richest majority black zip code in America.
https://giphy.com/gifs/star-shooting-the-more-you-know-3og0IMJcSI8p6hYQXS?utm_source=media-link&utm_medium=landing&utm_campaign=Media%20Links&utm_term=
Got a source? Would love to share it/meme it
Oof.
Big oof
But that would be RAYCIS! /s
They definitely should. Less chances for leftist indoctrination to ever take hold if kids could see the world for what it is instead of being abused/groomed.
Make Math Math Again!
Soy math.
Here's someone who agrees with you:
https://rumble.com/v11r99n-mike-harris-interview-the-khazarian-mafia-and-the-united-states.html
No one wants to be first…
Ooo, really like that. Sounds like a fantastic bumper sticker. :)
They want to demoralize and dumb down our children so they can be more easily controlled.
They have succeeded.
I read this site and marvel how most people on the right are just as stupid as most people on the left.
I realized long ago, we are utterly doomed.
Idiocracy wasn’t a comedy. It was a documentary from 2030.
Conservatives applaud Dave Rubin kidnapping a baby with his gay lover.
We are so far from God yet most people are content to continue golfing/video gaming & fapping.
We lost spiritual strength and the churches are silent on every moral issue. This isn’t 0.0001% if it either. Very sad.
Fuck off faggot
Are you saying "vote harder" and "two more weeks" aren't valid battle strategies?
Are you implying that we should not trust the plan?
Sessions is working in the real government. I have no doubts.
Why do kids need this shit thrown in their faces in order to learn maths...
What the actual fuck
well, you can extrapolate this shit out 20 years, and obviously we are headed for a mass genocide
thanks obama
We are in the midst of slow moving "gentle" genocide right now.
The PTB figured out in the first half of the twentieth century that it's best to go slow on these kind of things
a kindler gentler nazi gets you to kill yourself, abort your children, or sterilize yourself
amazing.
what do you mean?! Who doesnt love learning about third order polynomials mapping intrinsic racism to their age or race?!?!
"If little Johnny is a racist whitey, and 2x - 1 = 13, then solve for x."
"After Angelou was raped by her Democrat mom's Democrat boyfiend...she pimped out other women to more Democrats"
these people are targeting children in fucking pre-k. trying to carve a wedge in between them and their parents in order to groom a new breed of activists and shit disturbers to try and continue bringing down what we have long established as a civil society
vile, evil and cowardly
All cults isolate their members from preexisting social ties to make them more malleable. Basic stuff.
Homeschool parent here. Math books are awful. They are full of pictures and colors and extra words. Go back and look at an 1800’s math book. It’s a quick explanation, no pictures and then the equations. This is what a good math textbook should be. Too many colors and pictures and words on a page confuses the brain and thus makes focusing difficult. And that is the crux of this entire issue: the publishers do not want the students to learn mathematics but to hate it and focus on their true agenda - dumbing down of the population so they can be controlled.
Old saxon books (1st and 2nd editions) are good. Rays arithmetic can be found for free online. Rod and Staff a Mennonite publication may also be a good option though it doesn’t go into the higher maths. I use singapore primary for elementary but it has some drawbacks (common core creeps in).
You’re exactly right. I teach my son the math because the books are horrible at explaining it. They seem more concerned with busy work and confusing kids than teaching them.
this started with the feminization of schools. Busy work is right. public schools are instructed to give students credit for trying, and for organization and what not in math/science classes. That is how girls caught up to boys in grades/scores in math/science. Girls didnt perform better, the curriculum was changed such that now boys do worse.
Up to about the start of puberty, kids have very little critical thinking ability but incredible capacity to do things by rote memory and processing. They may not know what it means or why it is useful, but they can churn out an answer. When they begin to question everything, that's when it is appropriate to teach the conceptual and critical thinking side.
Making reading, writing, and basic math automatic are probably the biggest things you can do. Patterns, tips, and tricks are great. Teaching them 5 different abstract methods to think about solving a problem, early on, and forcing them to use them like common core does, just confuses them. Given enough exposure, they begin to develop their own methods and strategies that work for them. That's how mastery and understanding is eventually achieved.
Exactly. Young kids love memorizing and should memorize all math facts. If this is done a child then can go directly to fifth grade math. Understanding comes later but having the base of math facts then makes math less difficult and enjoyable and ultimately the student will excel.
The examples in article don't even relate to anything a child would need or want to do. So why would children even use the algebra for? CRT teachers are idiots.
It's because of ADHD
I'm old enough now that I remember some of that. You're right, very few pictures in the older stuff.
I remember a major transition in high school with curriculum during the mid 90s. New courses and books introduced. At the time I thought the new stuff was pretty slick because it had nice colors and looked more modern. It also didn't smell and wasn't held together by tape on the spine.
Had I know then what I know now....
I homeschooled my high school youngest during the Covid shutdowns.
He's a visual learner. He would have failed utterly with a "words only" approach. The specific topic that helped hugely with pictures were Geometry and Biology.
A good chunk of math was developed with geometry - aka pictures. Go look at the original competing theories of Calculus for a good example.
Don't let printing limitations from the 19th century stop your visual learners from getting a good education
Besides geometry, the majority of advanced math needs to be done abstractly without visual aides. It's better to push students to learn abstract mathematical reasoning than to limit them with only simple math that can be shown visually.
For people with a higher verbal IQ, you are correct.
My line of people has higher visual IQ. You are incorrect.
I spent a lot of my math career drawing simple pictures for complicated math. It helped a lot of people including myself.
To each their own, but it's hard to imagine programming or doing advanced calculus while still relying on visual aides. For what it's worth, I used to compete in math competitions as a middle and high school student and not one competitor there used visuals.
physicist post graduate. We use visual aids.
I did it all the time early on in my engineering career. When I'm presenting calculus based results I usually present them graphically as well as the equations.
See "Labview" for a professionally used graphical programming language. Super fast prototyping.
Plotting a function, understanding minimums and maximums, inversion points, slope, change in slope, and areas under a curve all seem like visually relatable concepts. Even when you move on to applications like statistics and physics, graphical representation is often very illuminating.
If I were going to introduce a student to the normal distribution, I would show it on a graph before I even talked about the cumulative distribution and probability density functions that define it.
Things like set theory, information theory, signal analysis/processing, topologies, and linear algebra can be very visual. I find it hard to think of any mathematics where visual representations like a graph, chart, or diagram are not routinely used to explain the concepts being studied.
Most kids won't even need math in the modern era.
Lol
This is either extremely dark foreboding of a dystopian future or
You forgot store exist
there is nothing wrong with useful diagrams. But they shouldn't have pictures just for the sake of adding 'interest'
Good advice. My kids are grown now but I wish I could have done that
I agree, the colors do tend to distract younger students, and older ones too, from the primary lessons in math.
At higher levels, like calculus 1, statistics and differential equations, focusing on equations and applications of identities is imperative; a lot of books have way too make visualizations which many not even help with learning in anyway, they make lessons longer than they have to be. Solving a variety of problems, to show how to logically get to an answer helps waaaay more. And, above calc 1, 2 & 3, visuals help, but only if being used to do something like a double or triple integral for area or volume, to see how integrals may be used to define objects, or using something like a derivative to see instantaneous rate of something.
Going through the laws and deducing are the best methods, I think.
Who needs math when you can cut your dick off?!?!?
That's how they teach subtraction now.
Underrated comment.
And division!
B-b-but... what if they don't want a "remainder"?
If you have 1 dick, and you cut off 1 dick, what does that equal?
Answer: mental illness
This would kill in a stand up comedy act
That first example with the polynomial fit line... Holy shit. The writers realllllllly hate Republicans to have to squeeze that BS in there. Why is there no example of approximating a line to the number of deaths attributed to Chairman Mao?
What made them hate people who like to store apples?
This is what happens when you give the left an inch.
They not only take a mile. They take that shit to the ends of the earth.
And give conservatives a mile and they'll take an inch, smdh.
So much dick hate?
41%. Holy fucking KEK.
The memes are bleeding over into other memes.
It's about control and creating a nation that cannot engineer anymore, thus breaking it in a generation or two.
I dont think that is the goal. The elites need things to function as much as anyone. Having power is pointless if you live in a shithole. They still need someone to design all their fancy luxury stuff, build their mansions, and keep the logistics going that make it so they never have to want for anything. It is not necessary to make people actually stupid, they just need to be controllable. This CRT stuff, the trans agenda, it is often compared to 1984 when they try to get him to say that 2+2 = 5. They dont actually need him to do bad math, they just want him to submit to that most obvious and basic level. In day to day operations they need people like him to do their work competently. Most of this stuff we are facing now is a means to an end. They dont want stupid kids, they want controllable kids. If anything they would try to make people stupid short term but the long term plan isnt common stupidity. Very smart people can be controlled if they are sufficiently brainwashed and affected by the right influences. Its the same thing as all the anti racist agenda, these are marxists. They create demand for change by creating chaos, then offering communism as the solution. Destabilizing race relations is how they accomplish the end goal. In the end they want no identities, outside of whatever group "the party" says to identify with, and no individualism.
In their utopian fantasy they have a still very functional society and all of the power condensed down to them by the end. Any breakdown is meant to be temporary.
Well, at least it seems we'll get more work if there are fewer engineers, if you happen to be an engineer.
Meanwhile in Asia...
and we get stuck with who can the all sing and dancing crap of the world...
Math like that falls into the same category as flipping burgers. It's an easily programmable task a computer can do.
They have graphs saying that conservatives are “Rayciss.” How is that math?
y = x + 2 3x + 6y = 12
Nate was a ________ who used his position of power to do things with kids that parents would not approve of.
A) (0,2) groomer B) (4,6) pedophile C) (-3,-2) serial killer D) (2,5) all of the above
I know you wanted me to answer D, but the correct answer is A.
Switch the numerical answers for A and D around, and the meme becomes stronger.
True, good point.
In contrast, how come we have never seen or ever will a scenario like this in a textbook. If the cycle rate of GI Joe's weapon is 600rds/minute and Joe averages a 3 second mag change, effectively how many rds could Joe send downrange assuming 30rd mags? 😃
Imagine "Them" getting their panties in a bunch over this.
GI Joe shoots a .308 at a hypersonic missile that is 12 miles away. How far away is the missile when America wins?
2 + 2 = Anal
and 1 - 1 = Tranny, which further can be reduced down 82% since that's how many of them commit suicide
WTF. Its math, no need to inject CRT, RACE, SJW shit unless you have an agenda you are pushing........
No logical defense other than that
Some people in those positions have even been caught on video now saying that exact thing and also that they can always simply shift the language of it to temporarily get around these laws/bans....
I guess they never thought that the governor would have a team actually go through the textbooks word by word. Every red state needs to do this because I guarantee you they simply trust the textbook companies broadly....
Never thought I'd be in favor of burning books, but here we are.
“Ju’Wan the Jogger can carry 5 boxes of Jordans. Ju’Wan lives 3 miles away from Foot Locker. How many trips would Ju’Wan need to make to fully loot in an hour if Ju’Wan can jog 4 MPH?”
"He steal no shoe he make no trip, one round shoot dead, Daewoo Numba Won!"
God bless Ron DeSantis and Florida Republicans. This is bullshit. These books touted racism statistics from a test as though it were objective.
Wow. Democrats don't want children educated. They want to kill everyone.
You're supposed to be learning MATH, not "empathizing". Not developing "emotions" or worrying about "implicit biases"
Daily Caller needs to start linking using Nitter.
If those people died of ass cancer it would be too good for them.
I say again: clamp down on the teacher's unions, purge the commies infesting them, and see who/what is funding the folks who set the curriculum.
Where are the examples, please, Daily Caller?
Not happy that I went to the article and no examples were displayed -- they just talked ABOUT them.
I need a visual, thank you.
I was disappointed too but the article mentioned something about copyright.
Why do these math questions even have story narratives? lol
1 + ___ = 3
a. (1) Maurice has HIV.
b. (3) Jusef joined the Taliban to kill infidels.
c. (2) Joe Biden is a warrior poet.
(Due to diversity and inclusion practices, all answers are correct. For minorities.)
I love this place! Hahahaha
LOL yeah not biased at all /s
This is something the left can never do, and has never done....shown evidence of why they do something
I'm very sick and tired of the Democrats fostering a culture of lies in America. I don't like where the US is going culturally from their warping values. On my personal level I now fight back where I can, dealing with local corruption.
But sticking Leftist propaganda lies into kids' textbooks certainly crosses the line. I live in the northern Cal Bay Area and the leftist newspapers have been painting the DeSantis action as Republican lies. We need to take on all the Marxist Democrats and drive them into the sea.
“Showing work” is white supremacy. Jesus H. Christ.
I'm glad they showed people the evidence.
Sample question:
Tyrone murders 3 people.
Whitey punches Tyrone for murdering Whitey's family.
Who gets more prison time?
Those examples. My mind can’t process how these are legitimate math questions for students. Unbelievable. No wonder our test scores are lousy.
My God...
I would say that these people are sick, but it goes beyond that. Liberals are thoroughly fucked in the head...
When I see shit like this, I can only look at people who support degeneracy like this as sub-human.
y=x+2 3x + 6y = 12
A: (0, 2) boyfriend
B: (4, 6) brother
C: (-3, -1) father
And
×=4-1 1=-4x+21
A: (-3, -2) Bookie
B: (9,10) Drug Dealer
C: (4, 5) Night Club Dancer
This is about maya angelou and her life, but why are they interjecting “stories” with math in the first place?
Propaganda.
I've heard of word problems, sure but no need to use "diverse" names like Angelou and Shaniquah. Bob has 5 candy bars and Sally has 10... no need to inject a "black sounding name" or a "Latinx gender-neutral name"
If George has 5 lbs of ground beef and Tina has 10, how much global warming is there when we apply the standard deviation of implicit racial bias and gendernormativity?
You can't be serious...
“If half of all reported crimes occur in 13.2% out of a total population of 385,000,000, how many potential criminals are there in that total population?”
I remember that "implicit bias" test. It took me about five minutes to realize that it's a video game.
It teaches you a control scheme, and once you have the muscle memory for it down, it flips the controls and then tells you you're racist because your speed and accuracy diminished due to your muscle memory being confused. Every gamer has experienced this trick, where something in a game screws with how your controls work and you panic.
So I did what I do in any boss fight I lose. I reloaded and tried again. And again. And again, until I'd gotten myself used to the switching controls. In the span of about an hour, I completely eliminated my "implicit bias" and undid a lifetime of racism, according to the test's logic.
It's complete bullshit.
As if the use of sexual abuse wasn’t bad enough, in the example given, they’re referencing Maya Angelou’s childhood specifically. So, a trip to Wikipedia and you don’t need to know how to do the actual math, because you know what the right answer should be.
DeSantis is 100% right here. There are a million topics one can cover for statistics and graphs, and the one they choose just so happens to be a very divisive topic.
Riddle me this, Batman. What accounts for 13% but also for half?
That math test from Missouri though... Yikes.
We need a Constitutional Amendment banning CRT!
How many ounces of gender fluid are in a pint?
Rejected biology textbook in California
“A boy has a penis. A girl has a vagina. “
I have to be frank with you folks.
There are all sorts of learning styles. The combination of real world "stories" with algebra actually improves learning.
The problem is the choice of stories; not the approach.
Now before you start hurling insults and calling me stupid, my UNDERGRAD degree required Calc 1, 2 and 3 -- all of which I aced.
People do learn best in different ways. You’re still wrong for trying to defend these people. There is no excuse for any of this. Stating your degree and the classes you took is a leftist tactic. It’s irrelevant. I’d bet good money I’m better at math than you and you have never heard me brag about it.
I'm not defending "these people".
"These people" are racists.
I'm defending the learning principle -- which is 100% worth pursuing.
My question would be is the Child answering the math problem or just guessing the correct word in the problem that is associated with the numbers?
That would become evident over time.
Not sure I agree. It seems like if you know the right answers to these "stories" you don't even have to know how to do the math
Do some research. You'll learn and agree.
Growing up I NEVER saw a multiple choice answer for a math test like their example where the 'story' has a missing word helps them guess the correct choice. That has to be the STUPIDEST way to teach math I've ever seen.
Unfortunately while children can choose their own genders as hormone blockers, they still cannot choose their own learning style. It’s one size fits all at schools, and Algebra stories are going to hold back more kids than they help.
You have a PhD in education?
Liberals are the most racist people on the planet. You cannot change my mind.
Please tell me this shit is fake
It would be even cooler if you could read them. Mofos took a damn cell phone picture of a computer screen and released it.