2974
Comments (393)
sorted by:
422
BabbleRabble 422 points ago +427 / -5

when he's right, he's right.

72
SHILL_DETECTOR 72 points ago +78 / -6

maybe he should focus on a better name for twitter though

62
BabbleRabble 62 points ago +63 / -1

Musky perhaps?

166
Skogin 166 points ago +166 / -0

Musket

235
projectfreedom 235 points ago +236 / -1

MySpaceX.

83
Badradness 83 points ago +83 / -0

This is a victory. MySpaceX wins hahaha

26
projectfreedom 26 points ago +26 / -0

This idea isn't mine and has been floating around the net for a while.

0
OzarkCrypto_com 0 points ago +1 / -1

r/DWAC_Research/

49
IHeartMyDoggy 49 points ago +49 / -0

Each post could be a “launch”

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
RabidZoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do they have to be tyrants...or can we just start ejecting any and all trannies into orbit?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
the_sky_is_falling 16 points ago +16 / -0

I like Musket

11
VonTyger 11 points ago +11 / -0

Most Valuable Poster

7
Meme_Too 7 points ago +7 / -0

Genius.

8
lmao 8 points ago +8 / -0

lmao

5
Skogin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Skogin

7
robob2700 7 points ago +7 / -0

Came here for Musket

6
Antemalagon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Best name for free speech app ever, full send on the truth .

2
UNLIMITED_POWER 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean an assault musket of mass destruction? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

10
HotPropGun 10 points ago +10 / -0

The Musketeer

4
SHILL_DETECTOR 4 points ago +5 / -1

lol

3
Valensiakol 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ol' Musky

1
Normal 1 point ago +1 / -0

E-Lie-on?

6
MarcusAurelius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Should Twitter drop the "R"

Yes

Of Course

5
knnbccb 5 points ago +6 / -1

Titter. Where you make tits.

7
MerlynTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think you can do that on any site though. Including here, see: (.) (.) or maybe you prefer ( . ) ( . )

2
Normal 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just shorten it to Twits.

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Moonbats

2
wantstogomoon 2 points ago +3 / -1

Keep it simple: TWIT. People can do 'twits'.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
56
IHeartMyDoggy 56 points ago +58 / -2

For Trumpet...each post could be a “toot” 😀

43
thermobear 43 points ago +43 / -0

Or a honk!

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
17
OldGloryUnfurled 17 points ago +18 / -1

a DOOT

13
Conservativechick 13 points ago +13 / -0

The updoots we be doots. A toot and doot. Like - Imma doot your toot.

5
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 5 points ago +5 / -0

I am reporting this comment to HR

5
CrispyQuesoSalami 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doot or nothing.

5
Daffy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Blast

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
26
MissingTrump 26 points ago +26 / -0

Lol. Already a better name than Truth Social.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
alcowiggles 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's probably targeted to corporate boomers.

2
pacalis128 2 points ago +2 / -0

Moar tits and twats!

15
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 15 points ago +15 / -0

He's definitely not wrong.

9
bidensmissingbrain 9 points ago +9 / -0

He's been right quite a bit lately...

118
couranto 118 points ago +118 / -0

He’s egging on Trump to join Twitter in order to reply.

42
Specter 42 points ago +42 / -0

Lmao that’s brilliant

28
alcibiades_hammer 28 points ago +28 / -0

By Jove, I think you’re right. Good take.

17
nicodemus 17 points ago +17 / -0

Exactly my thought. It's probably killing him not being able to respond in kind!

8
WhitePhoenix 8 points ago +8 / -0

That would be a Trump-like 4D chess move lmao

1
Obvious 1 point ago +1 / -0

It might even be 5D. He knows Trump will win re-election, he'll have Trump back on his platform. His companies will benefit hard from it all.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
94
Rerun1Central 94 points ago +95 / -1

God bless you Elon - you and Trump need to team up!

9
Conservativechick 9 points ago +10 / -1

Trump / DeSantis 24, then DeSantis / Musk 28 & 32, then Musk / Rittenhouse 36 & 40.

Almost got half the century covered.

10
Cameron 10 points ago +10 / -0

In 19 years Baron Trump can run for president. Baron Trump 2044-3044

6
Conservativechick 6 points ago +6 / -0

YES.

7
YoLLamaIsSoFat 7 points ago +7 / -0

If Musk were constitutionally allowed to be President, this would be grand. lol

3
Conservativechick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh yeah, I forgot about that part.

0
ripley88 0 points ago +3 / -3

Sorry, but Nick Fuentes will be elected the youngest president in history in 2036

-35
deleted -35 points ago +7 / -42
57
ModernDayMao 57 points ago +57 / -0

Dorsey has an Antifa tattoo

41
Isolated_Patriot 41 points ago +41 / -0

Dorsey is snaking his way into to try and get Musk to put him back as CEO of twitter. That's all that's happening with him. He smells the shit winds blowing and wants to be relevant again.

All of this shit started under his watch, under his direction. He was only forced out because he wouldn't go far enough.

21
IncredibleMrE1 21 points ago +21 / -0

Dorsey is snaking his way into to try and get Musk to put him back as CEO of twitter.

Glad other people are paying attention.

11
POOP_SMEARED_TITTIES 11 points ago +11 / -0

"Hi Mr Elon, i was CEO of this shitshow company for a decade and did NOTHING to improve things besides being a BITCH for my globohomo handlers. Please let me do it again"

8
robob2700 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Smell than Rand?"

"Smell what Mr Lahey?"

"Shit winds. There's a shit storm coming Randy."

3
Nerdrem1 3 points ago +4 / -1

I don't understand why he would even want to. Dude's a billionaire, he's set for life. He's also the founder and CEO of Square, it's not like he needs two jobs.

7
IncredibleMrE1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Money is secondary to his desire for power and control.

5
mugatucrazypills 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think he's happier at square and bitching

4
SuperOrk 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if anybody understands Dorsey. I don't, but at least I know so.

3
Conservativechick 3 points ago +3 / -0

So he can try to redeem himself and not be known as "the guy who ruined the internet."

3
WhitePhoenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unlike Musk, he's doing all this for himself and his attention and his desire for control.

18
rcaskrenz 18 points ago +18 / -0

dorsey is still a fag, he put the anti free speech diversity hire in charge of twitter

13
Mrsattorney 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dorsey's bizarre outward appearance/decline is a manifestation of where he is mentally. He looks like he's in a very dark place. In fact, he looks like he belongs in a rubber room.

4
Conservativechick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too many spirit cooking parties, prolly.

8
Mrsattorney 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have more confidence in Peter Thiel than Dorsey or Musk.

85
lefty295 85 points ago +88 / -3

Trump should have a dating app called “Trumpbone” as well to go along with it. That or grabber (by the pussy).

99
SantaQlaus 99 points ago +100 / -1

Grabr

27
MN_RED_2024 27 points ago +27 / -0

Biden admin would try to compete with it by launching Sniffr.

9
easyonthefiber 9 points ago +9 / -0

And Hunter can have Footr!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
MrsMAGA9 4 points ago +4 / -0

Incestr

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
Roadcruiser2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Drugr.

22
Psyk0Tripp 22 points ago +22 / -0

Genius

7
K-Harbour 7 points ago +7 / -0

and Grab'em.

6
Noitwasntthat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ugh TOO GOOD

4
seismic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hahaha

9
the_hawk 9 points ago +9 / -0

Dam Brother - 2 swings of the bat and 2 home-runs. Unbelievable!

6
CrackerJack2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trumpet is, I think, French for small Trump.
Trombones are louder.

7
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trombonr

3
CrackerJack2 3 points ago +3 / -0

'Cause trombones are bigger.

2
penguinjay1212 2 points ago +3 / -1

gRaBr sounds like the best thing ever.

Theres some other dating app called unjected that I dont know whether to trust or troll. But, w.e, this sounds much better. Not like unjected can vet its members for not having taken part in the human taint experiment, so I see no difference except broad appeal in opposition to niche format.

55
MythArcana 55 points ago +56 / -1

Ding, ding, ding.

If you cannot say 'faggot' on Truth, then it ain't the truth.

54
TrumpWonByALandslide 54 points ago +54 / -0

At least we can say "faggot" on PDW as much as we want.

For example:

BILL MITCHELL IS A FAGGOT

19
deleted 19 points ago +25 / -6
8
Colonel_Chestbridge 8 points ago +9 / -1

Still there.. As if that wouldn’t get you instantly banned on twitter either.

And even if they do remove it on this specific community you’re definitely free to talk about this all you want on others.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
10
deleted 10 points ago +14 / -4
0
fat50 0 points ago +0 / -0

Isn't it odd how this community will dunk on Muslims relentlessly but will downvote and shoah jew-naming posts all the time???

I see way more "synagogue of Satan" hate than I see Muslim hate here, so it isn't being banned en masse.

5
MeinDonald 5 points ago +5 / -0

It used to be all Muslim-hate and Jew-love and "Israel is our greatest ally"

Tides have been turning this past year

1
BamBamBoogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The severity of tyranny is never embellished.

-1
superfly -1 points ago +4 / -5

You are correct.
Truth isn't being censored here.
Only generalized insults.

3
MeinDonald 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's where you're wrong kiddo

-2
superfly -2 points ago +0 / -2

Just look into my post history.
It's not GAB, where I can name the truth, but it's still good enough for me.

1
MeinDonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

They make it difficult to check if one of your comments are hidden.

You would need to use a different account or incognito, and then use that account to look through the parent-comments for your one comment. Viewing the permalink of the comment, will show the comment no matter what. They shadow-hide it from the main original post link.

It could take a while for you to check through all your comments on which ones are "shadowed"

0
superfly 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bro, just check out my posts.

-5
Liberty_Prime -5 points ago +2 / -7

You know there's an entire platform tied to this place, right?

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
-3
Liberty_Prime -3 points ago +2 / -5

You guys keep whining that you can't say what you want.

The people who made this place GAVE you that.

It's not that you can't be heard.

It's that nobody wants to HEAR your shit.

You're CNN+.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
-3
Liberty_Prime -3 points ago +2 / -5

I know the truth hurts.

But the only reason you're mad is because you and your beliefs aren't popular.

If they were, you would make your OWN room popular.

But you can't.

Face it. Your views are fringe.

13
MythArcana 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yes. Yes we can, and yes he is. LoL

4
SpezIsANazisCumRag 4 points ago +8 / -4

Yeah but we can't say the N word here which is stupid.

We can say any other kind of racial, gender/sex, cultural or religious slur but if we use the N one, we get banned for "racism". It's such fucking bullshit. The words "racist" and "racism" are relatively modern words introduced by a jew in the early 1900's to facilitate what is now known as "multiculturalism" and "White replacement" and banning patriots for racism is not only anti-MAGA, it plays into the left's game of manipulating speech and history. Throughout all of Human history until recently, it was natural and normal to have an ingroup preference and to want to maintain ethnic, cultural, traditional and religious homogeneity.

4
deleted 4 points ago +8 / -4
2
SpezIsANazisCumRag 2 points ago +7 / -5

I have plenty of times but yes, the faggoty mods will also ban people for speaking the truth about them.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
FakeNametag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we even need to say faggot anymore? We could probably just say Bill Mitchell and get the point across.

1
DRKMSTR 1 point ago +1 / -0

I tried to get a fire going, but I ran out of faggots.

10
ThomasJ 10 points ago +10 / -0

Can I blast N’s too?

10
alcibiades_hammer 10 points ago +13 / -3

I mean, maybe you could but then that’s when, hopefully, others will use their free speech to let you know your just being obnoxious. The solution is always more speech not less.

5
MeinDonald 5 points ago +6 / -1

No. The mods shadow-hide those comments

2
DRKMSTR 2 points ago +2 / -0

Naggers are people who annoy me.

(South Park)

Obviously you can say whatever you want, but that stuff will get downvoted to oblivion. I don't speak for the mods though.

0
67Vert 0 points ago +3 / -3

Here on TD? Not sure about the N word but this place hates black people. You’ll typically get at least 300 updoots for any post showing a black person doing something bad.

3
Cameron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Democrats defend thugs because they are black

Conservatives attack thugs because they are thugs, and most happen to be black.

You get 300 updoots because more often than not your post about a black person doing something illegal would otherwise be buried in any leftist media site - you get 300 updoots because seeing the truth free from censorship is refreshing.

1
67Vert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for confirmation

2
Cameron 2 points ago +2 / -0

13:50 my friend. 13:50

9
Gwoz8881 9 points ago +9 / -0

You also can’t say “gas the ((( )))”

1
DRKMSTR 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gas the onion?

Let's face it, the onion gasses us everytime we cut it.

7
kr0m 7 points ago +7 / -0

the funny thing is i recently got banned from the pro-DWAC stock reddit for suggesting that twitter will probably actually lose advertisers if it goes fully freedom of speech (meaning people will be throwing around n-words and 'faggot' over there), while Truth will do better because it does actually have some degree of censorship, in an attempt to make it family friendly, which i personally have no problem with. especially if Twitter is there as the full freedom of speech alternate platform. i think there's room for all types of sites with varying degrees of moderation as long as somewhere exists where people can say anything.

but i do think being able to say anything as long as it's legal, over at twitter, will hurt twitter financially. Musk seems to already know this because he said it's not about money for him. so in the long run i think Truth will end up doing better with advertisers/profit.

but the mere fact that in my post at that reddit, which was supportive of the idea that Truth's stock will go up, i also pointed out that it will be due to Truth actually having some censorship, they banned me. on the grounds that they said i was lying about Truth having censorship. even though you can see articles where Nunes himself talks about how Truth will be moderated to keep it family friendly. this has always been a huge problem with pro-trump communities- huge levels of hypocrisy. i got banned from the OG reddit version of the donald for criticizing trump. meanwhile our communities love to point out how liberal communities are echo chamber hive minds where dissent is not allowed, to any degree. while we don't allow it in our own, either.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +2 / -1

Firstly, nothing on Reddit is pro-conservative, so that battle is already lost before it starts. Democrats are proudly dying on the hill of free speech and it's glorious. Remember, this forum was started on Reddit and we were persecuted and cast out for telling the truth and trying to conduct free-speech conversations. I'm fairly happy with the way things turned out here as things smoothed out and the tensions reduced with the rules a bit. We have to play hard ball now, the optics stage is way behind us at this point.

Secondly, social media is not a human right. Children should not be on it, period. They should be out doing kid stuff, learning and having fun to develop their brains, not absorbing ridiculous adult content and having to sort through that ridiculousness. I lived 34 years of life before the mainstream Internet boom, and I'm all the better for it. I was the world's darkest white kid growing up because I was always outside riding bikes, camping, hiking and actually visiting my friend's houses and spending the night there. Kids today have phones stuck to their hands like a bad Star Trek episode, and getting into loads of trouble while falling into the hands of predators, then everyone wonders how that happened.

Just my two cents, of course, but I wouldn't put any stock in any social media platform until Jesus comes.

3
kr0m 3 points ago +4 / -1

i agree about kids not being on devices. 100%

the donald wasn't really pro 'free speech' on reddit. not in the sense of you being allowed to say anything. i was banned for merely criticizing how trump was constantly bringing up DACA and how he wanted to make the DACA people happy. i pointed out to the mods that they had Ann Coulter linked on the side-bar and she had become the biggest critic of Trump on our side, so it's pretty ridiculous and hypocritical of them to ban me for pointing out that sometimes he says and does shitty things that really aren't MAGA, including picks.

jesus has nothing to do with any investment i am or am not going to make. whether it may or may not go up in value does, and if it's something i want to support. social media is unfortunately important in the world today, even though i myself don't really participate in it, unless this site counts. but it gives conservatives a platform to get their message out. truth social came along to combat censorship on twitter, as musk pointed out. so i believed that was majorly important and invested in it.

but the whole point of my post was that the people who run the pro DWAC reddit are complete fucking retards and hypocrites. they deny Truth has any censorship even though it clearly does. and i don't have any problem with it having it.

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm shocked they even attempt to have a Truth sub on Reddit to begin with. The only truth on Reddit is that it's run by commies in San Francisco who don't know what gender they are. We had to play by their rules there, which stifled any minor attempt at free speech, which is why they chased us off in the end.

Even the stock subs over there were frozen over the Gamestop campaign, and then Congress took interest because it screwed up the Wall Street shorters by exposing their criminal behavior. I remember that Stonetear character over there asking how to delete stuff for Hillary, then the admin was quick to wipe his tracks off the server, even after subpoenas from Congress. Honestly, Reddit is probably next on the chopping block since they accepted $30 million in CCP money to stay afloat.

3
kr0m 3 points ago +3 / -0

ok but the 'free speech' was just as 'stifled' by the mods of the donald reddit themselves. 'free speech' would include being allowed to criticize Donald Trump when he does things like talk about making DACA happy, which totally went squarely against what he campaigned on. and i got banned for it. by the donald mods, not by reddit itself.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, correct. Our mods had to play the game with Reddit in order to continue operating there. It wasn't their decision out of the blue to do that; it was directed from Reddit admin or get shut down. After our mods complied, it still wasn't good enough for Reddit admin, so we had to fold. Now, things are much more palpable here because that element is completely gone.

0
kr0m 0 points ago +1 / -1

you are starting to seem completely insane. i was banned for CRITICIZING TRUMP. the donald mods did not do that to appease reddit or 'play ball' with them. the mods of the donald did that because they specifically stated in their rules that they essentially wanted an ECHO CHAMBER. the rules were everything had to be 100% pro trump. that has NOTHING to do with complying with or playing ball with reddit. it's the simple fact that people on our side are often just as against allowing even slightly opposing viewpoints as people on the left are.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +6 / -0

You cant say faggot on truth?

wtf?

6
MythArcana 6 points ago +6 / -0

From what I understand, you cannot.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +6 / -0

The fuck is the point then?

If i cant openly call someone a faggot for being a faggot, then I dont care much for that platform.

3
WhitePhoenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny thing is nowadays the use of the word "faggot" is pretty much a modern version of calling someone a retard.

aka stop being a dumbass.

2
jda70 2 points ago +2 / -0

Back in my day calling someone a faggot was fighting words! LOL

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. But you won't have to make a decision if you're on Android, so there's always that.

4
thisguy883 4 points ago +4 / -0

Which I am. lol.

Oh well. No real loss i guess.

-1
BidensButtWiper -1 points ago +2 / -3

RUT ROW SOMEONE SAID SOME FACTS ABOUT TRUTH SOCIAL AND HOW IT SUCKS

The truth social simps and DWAC griftees like u/y_do_i_need_to_hide will be here to defend it in no time!

2
y_do_i_need_to_hide 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm not even going to read the thread. The Great and Powerful Karnak willed now do his act. You are dumb, and nothing you said in this has even a big relationship to reality. Somebody DM me and let me know how I did

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

I 100% guarantee you won’t be able to do it on Elon’s twitter either

1
MeinDonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

true

27
WenOli311 27 points ago +28 / -1

We all know the New Daddy of TWATTER is a fan of Trump

15
IncredibleMrE1 15 points ago +19 / -4

LOL. The same Elon who rage-quit GEOTUS' advisory councils because he got triggered when GEOTUS quit the Paris climate accords? https://nitter.net/elonmusk/status/870369915894546432

17
ThereAreOnly2Genders 17 points ago +19 / -2

Musk is a Lefists. He's just a sane one

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
5
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 5 points ago +7 / -2

This! Elon doesn't believe any of that shit. It's all about the ben-hamins.

3
Waco419 3 points ago +3 / -0

More importantly, it's all about his quest to build a Martian colony. He is a real life Don Quixote. Every decision he makes is evaluated as to its helpfulness or harmfulness to his quest for Mars. Money, persona, reputation, politics, every business decision, Twitter purchase, every tweet, who he hires or fires, his deals with China, Germany, Starlink, battery technology. All of it. It's always about Mars.

2
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nanu Nanu

4
projectfreedom 4 points ago +5 / -1

A basketball is just a round square.

5
JoePlumber 5 points ago +5 / -0

musk buys into the climate Apocalypse agenda and actually believes that Paris shit would make a difference. he can't be right about everything.

his big company kind relies on the climate Apocalypse narrative being believed, though...

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh. Not really. Teslas will sell regardless. Despite the higher initial price they still save you shitloads of money on gas and maintenance in the long run.

2
JoePlumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

disagree. they are shit because they're completely reliant on a silicon and lithium battery that dies in only a few years at which point you have no trade in value and you just have a worthless hunk of metal with a fancy computer inside.

I will continue to drive my gasoline and diesel vehicles until the day I die.

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tesla batteries last for over 300,000 miles and cost about 5k.

They haven’t been around long but in the data that’s come out so far, teslas last far longer than normal cars with about 1/4 of the maintenance cost.

2
JoePlumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://electrek.co/2020/06/06/tesla-battery-degradation-replacement/

Today, it gets 230 miles (370 km) on a full charge, which means a 10.5% degradation in battery capacity

Pathetic.

I have a 1979 Mercedes diesel that gets 50mpg and has over 350k miles on it.

again, I'll stick to things that work and aren't full of lithium and cobalt. EVs are a gimmick for people who would be better off with a scooter.

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

Less than 10% degradation after 160,000 miles and you think that’s a bad thing?? This just proves my point.

How much work did you have to do on your Mercedes’ in that time?

1
WhitePhoenix 1 point ago +2 / -1

Disagree. I actually think we need to get off of fossil fuels because it's a limited resource. I mean, we won;'t run out for a long time if we drill within our country, but I don't want to be dependent on it. So it's mostly to me about sustainability. Peak oil is a myth but we use a shitload of oil every month, and I'd much rather use something that gives us way more bang for the buck when it comes to energy use - i.e. nuclear power.

Being energy independent is 100% an America-first policy. Not because we believe the climate armageddon propagandists, but more for our ability to be a strong country. It helps us in the long run that we don't have to burn through as much fossil fuel or import it from anywhere else.

1
Herefordamemesss 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, peak oil can't be a myth.

Peak oil is the moment when we're extracting the most oil we ever will, and from that moment on are extracting less and (eventually) less.

It's a certainty that peak oil will one day happen. It's just an argument of when.

1
JoePlumber 1 point ago +1 / -0

dont need to drive fag EVs to be energy independent.

2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +4 / -2

The rage quit was "according to sources familiar with the matter," why do you believe them?

5
IncredibleMrE1 5 points ago +5 / -0

I quite literally linked the tweet where Elon confirmed he was quitting and why. Lmfao

1
sickofaltspin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am referring to your claim about rage quitting.

1
Maga2020Maga2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol Elon is not MAGA and NOT a Trump backer.

stop falling for Elon's nice guy bullshit

18
Noxide 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's catchy. Trump really should do that.

4
sackofwisdom 4 points ago +4 / -0

And then the design language can still use Trump golden hair but also golden trumpets. 🎺

18
Mildad 18 points ago +18 / -0

That’s actually not bad at all

13
thermobear 13 points ago +13 / -0

And instead of sending tweets, you send toots. Or honks.

9
IllKissYourBoobies 9 points ago +9 / -0

Honks! I love it!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
CheezeeKracker 11 points ago +11 / -0

We need a logo. Like a lion draped in an American flag, wearing a crown and blowing a trumphet. Like a royal herald image

9
grandfather_nurgle 9 points ago +9 / -0

I smell a tag team.

3
ModernDayMao 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes Truth Twitter and DWAC become one and shared go to 10,000 each…..please.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
ShrikeDeCil 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about "Snowflake Central" for their new name?

7
NvJohansson 7 points ago +7 / -0

He's sure giving TS lots of free ad

7
Joes_Hippocampus 7 points ago +7 / -0

How about TRUMP-IT

1
Atlas_Honked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dump it and Trump-it

6
SteersBeersandQueers 6 points ago +6 / -0

That actually makes sense

1
Displayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont get it?? english isnt my first language tho , i speak it pretty well tho, i still dont understand the world play here? ELI5 pls?

6
4
IllKissYourBoobies 4 points ago +4 / -0

u/phzoe should be a billionaire by now.

3
phzoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't want to brag ... but I'm quite cozy.

6
Songofsixpence 6 points ago +6 / -0

I agree! Haha what a timeline. They should totally change it!

5
SFSilentNoMore 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trumpet and Musket

for the 1st and 2nd Amendments - could be a joint venture between Truth and Twitter

I told him so

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

When something trends on Truth Social, it can be "Trumpeted"...

This both makes it a concept, and promotes the name.

5
Noitwasntthat 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want them to be friends. Having multiple platforms isn't bad, it doesnt have to be one or the other.

4
VonTyger 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a good name lol

4
3
alcibiades_hammer 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is prophetic

2
DRKMSTR 2 points ago +2 / -0

How tf did you find that?

1
TheDoppelgamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember reading all these when it was first announced and just had to go back and searched for it.

2
AslanFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need to tweet that to Elon.

2
Deplora 2 points ago +2 / -0

Several of us independently suggested this back when the "Truth Social" name was first made public. Elon is late to the party. "Truth Social" is a dreadful name.

I'm guessing there was some concern that calling it "Trumpet" might lead to legal attacks claiming violations of campaign finance laws, on the grounds that "Trumpet" was just a thinly veiled synonym for "Trump" the candidate.

1
2
BlmIsTerroristOrg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey whats up

2
BlmIsTerroristOrg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha oh yeah. Me original lol

4
Wild___Bill 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's not wrong. Truth social is a dumb name

4
67Vert 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump should post on on Twitter, “Follow me on TRUTH”

1
Maga2020Maga2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

simply an automated post on twitter that says he posted on Truth, every single time

simply use twatter as a notification that a post was made

3
Chodeus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like it!!

3
IllKissYourBoobies 3 points ago +3 / -0

TRUMPET and MUSKET

3
MAGAnic316 3 points ago +3 / -0

How the fuck did they miss this opportunity?! 🤦🏼

Trump.

Free speech.

Trump-it.

Trumpet 🎺

I mean, it’s all right there in the name. How did they not even discover it by accident?!

“Trumpet the truth...” could have been the Tagline.

3
PoohClimbsTrees 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck me! This would be awesome!

3
thisguy883 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's ragging on Truth social.

Someone made an observation that he is doing it to get Trump back on Twitter.

I hope that's the case and I hope it works!

1
Maga2020Maga2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope Trump simply uses it to notify people he posted something on Truth

Just an automated reminder that he made a new post.

Then they go there and read it and comment.

3
ubermk3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Merge Twitter and Truth, call it Trumpet. Everyone wins.

2
Ghostphaez 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean Twumpet.

3
VarusSPQR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well shit, that’s a good idea.

3
GrayManNumber333 3 points ago +4 / -1

Didn’t someone on here say that like a year ago?

4
Crappydatum 4 points ago +4 / -0

I believe I did

3
Deplora 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, Trumpet, with posts called toots, and then rename Twitter to Musket, with posts called shots. The two billionaires could then engage in debates with each tooting/shooting from their own platforms, forcing people who wanted to follow the discussions to use both platforms. Win win.

2
JetJocky 2 points ago +2 / -0

They could say, "shoot me a toot" instead of post me a response. I like that, haha.

3
Songofsixpence 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if Elon renamed Twitter to Trumpet?

3
ShrikeDeCil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Titter still better.

3
Hickory 3 points ago +3 / -0

Man's got a point

3
Ravenous 3 points ago +4 / -1

Should be called Broken Social

3
Brew_Dude 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make it so, #1.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
skymom 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's never too late to rebrand...

3
auntjemima 3 points ago +3 / -0

Twitter should be called REEEborn.

2
FFSakeCameBack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trumpit.

2
blueballs43 2 points ago +2 / -0

NOW THATS A DAM GOOD IDEA!

2
RussianRobot 2 points ago +3 / -1

He’s turned the “eye of Elon” on to truth social LOL I think we all know what that means don’t we?

💸💰💵💶💷💴

2
kr0m 2 points ago +2 / -0

what do you think it means?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
tonkabodhi 2 points ago +2 / -0

🌞

2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's completely right.

2
RandArrow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did he reply to himself?

1
ALtHoneyBadger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only in third person.

2
ubermk3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m ready for the trumpet to sound.

2
pie4all88 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh, that name carries religious doomsday overtones.