3001
Comments (363)
sorted by:
322
deleted 322 points ago +324 / -2
103
Kaizen 103 points ago +104 / -1

Sounds like a great incentive for saving tax payers money into what essentially is free housing free food free bed.

44
doug2 44 points ago +46 / -2

Free butt sex too

44
leakmouth 44 points ago +45 / -1

Oh great now you got Barack Obama’s attention.

36
BostonVoter 36 points ago +37 / -1

Big Mike has Entered the Chat

8
HerbertBailBondsh 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where is Reggie Love these days.. or Larry Sinclair?

11
July_1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

2
KeepWomanAtHome 2 points ago +3 / -1

Free stink fists

17
Hanging_Chad 17 points ago +17 / -0

Free security, free TV, free healthcare, free dental(?), ...

8
Dontstopbelieving 8 points ago +8 / -0

Free gym, free Jim, free accounting, free movies, free utilities, free maintenance, free yard work. Basically live like a king, er, queen maybe

8
EvanGRogers 8 points ago +8 / -0

Honestly, there'd be a probably with "suicide-payoffs" or whatever.

You break into your neighbors house, get killed (you're suicidal), neighbor gets millions nad splits it with your family.

3
ironhansed 3 points ago +3 / -0

as if thats a bad thing.

1
EvanGRogers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, incentivizing death is something satan does.

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

homeless people actually get themselves arrested for minor infractions, usually trespassing, to get a few days of a warm bed and three squares

34
ParticleCannon 34 points ago +34 / -0

Plus a refund for the ammo

22
DarkPepe1776 22 points ago +22 / -0

Gun owner reparations. I love it.

15
bangbus 15 points ago +15 / -0

And at current market prices, not the price from when she bought it. Imagine if she had that ammo for two years and got reimbursed out of pocket expenses only.

6
Annoyedwiththedevoid 6 points ago +7 / -1

"two bullets, here's your 18,000$"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
25
cjcivicx 25 points ago +25 / -0

This is the way. Put a monetary target on the backs of these pieces of shit.

5
Fuck_commies_2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

Love it! But we know it’s never gonna happen because it practical and makes sense.

22
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 22 points ago +22 / -0

Absolutely based. He got what he fucking deserved.

10
buco 10 points ago +10 / -0

Another thug bites the dust.

7
Rhuairhi 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dumb dumb dumb, dumdumdumdum dumb dumb

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
79
c89631147e 79 points ago +84 / -5

But all the cucks here told me shooting criminal trespassers was illegal in Texas. 🤷🏼‍♂️

45
c_programmer 45 points ago +46 / -1

Texas' laws regarding that are complex enough that prudent defenders aught pretend it doesn't exist.

This case would be straightforward in all 50 states. She had a completely reasonable fear for her life. She didn't shoot him for trespassing.

12
MasklessMarvel 12 points ago +12 / -0

protecting her children is reason enough

26
RabidZoo 26 points ago +26 / -0

Does Texas have the Castle Doctrine?

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
45
Urusovite 45 points ago +49 / -4

It applies to anywhere you are legally allowed to be. That means public street, sidewalks, house, neighbors where you are given permission, etc.

EDIT: Downvotes from morons who can't read the law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

14
Cyer6 14 points ago +14 / -0

These laws and doctrines exist in TX but right now, the Travis County (Soros) DA is charging that Army sergeant who dropped the antifa thug who was raising his AK at him during the summer of luv.

15
Boruzu 15 points ago +15 / -0

And how many Soros d.a. traitors are running around, you ask? Dozens. Whenever crime blows up, Soros money follows. https://nypost.com/2021/12/16/how-george-soros-funded-progressive-das-behind-us-crime-surge/amp/

10
Urusovite 10 points ago +10 / -0

Charging, but those charges are likely to be dropped

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was indicted but there's been no news on it since December.

4
Rucus0101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Travis county tried to charge a guy who shot an illegal who was in the act of raping his wife and young daughter.

4
deleted 4 points ago +8 / -4
7
Urusovite 7 points ago +8 / -1

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
9
T-Bear 9 points ago +9 / -0

Texas Castle Law also covers your place of business and your vehicle.

If the local law enforcement and local prosecutors follow the law instead of their puppet-masters' politics, people should not be charged at all for self-defense or response to eminent criminal threat.

Texas Castle Law also allows for the lethal defense against unarmed threats, if there is a disparate difference in size, physical fitness, age, health, gender, etc.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong. It extends to your curtilage.

i have a torn one in my right knee

I am not sure why I would ever have to defend it

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

so riddle me this

when illegal aliens cross, the are entering private property

they have destroyed massive amounts of farm/ranch land

why can't the ranchers use this law to arm themselves and protect their property?

i mean, total strangers- felons, in fact- sneaking on to your land in the dark where you cannot tell if they are armed or not should be sufficient reason to fear for your life

4
Urusovite 4 points ago +4 / -0

It means war on the cartels and with feds is why. We’d need a governor (like West) who promised to arrest feds violating Texas law.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

fuck the cartels, all it would do is make them visible. they like to sneak, not fight.

they have to get the kids and drugs in

do you really think they would start a civil war over people protecting their own land?

if I am CBP out there in the middle of nowhere, I would be like "Hmm, another dead immigrant. Must have been the coyotes"

you know they would off them if they could

note: I am talking about adult males, not women and kids

3
Urusovite 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wrong. Cartels are killing people and confronting farmers down there all the time. Cartels don’t have to worry about retaliation because our feds love it. More Democrat votes with tye cartels smuggling people in.

3
portuguesemama123 3 points ago +3 / -0

it used to be that way. they should not be able to use the farmer's resource to succeed in committing a crime. failure to stop someone from using your resources (knowingly) could be construed as helping the criminal, could it not? what was once reasonable is considered ludicrous and what was once considered ludicrous is not considered reasonable.

3
PsychoDodo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lotta land in that back 40.... not like they'd be missed.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

and coyotes (the animal) would enjoy some Mexican food

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

wow, even the cops can't shoot you for property crimes

0
Dontstopbelieving 0 points ago +1 / -1

Police: I need some information for my report.
Mom: I was super scared, Police: You don’t seem scared and your dog is chewing on the bloody perp.
Mom: I don’t know. Summer of love, COVID, fentanyl Floyd, dog will do what dogs will do. Did I say you could come in. Police: we’ll just take this trash with us

17
Urusovite 17 points ago +19 / -2

Duh. Had it forever. Texas castle doctrine is better than almost all states (or all of them). You can pursue a target who stole property and use deadly force to retrieve it. Did someone steal your $1.00 plastic comb and run? Cool. Chase them down and use any force necessary to get it back.

u/c89631147e anyone who told you that is a moron.

EDIT for the morons who downvote:

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

YES, you can shoot trespassers. YES, you can shoot burglars who have fled. YES, you can use deadly force to defend yourself and your property. YES, you can do both of those any place you are legally allowed to be.

7
Asun 7 points ago +7 / -0

Better yet, if someone steal your water bottle and run, you can take your time mounting your hunting rifle and blow the thief's heads out from 1 mile away. It's perfectly legal.

6
skatestraight 6 points ago +8 / -2

Good luck making a head shot at a mile away. Have you ever shot a gun not in a video game?

3
Geralt_of_Rivia1 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yep, you are never shooting someone who is running in a specific body part.

Longest shot I have ever actually made against a real target was 850 yards for an elk. Western Colorado, unobstructed with minimal wind. And an elk chest cavity is about a 24 inch circle

3
skatestraight 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's impressive. I made a shot just under 500 yards on a moose and I won't shoot farther than that because I don't really want to track it for hours. Some people don't understand long distance shooting, not that 500 yards is long distance, but it's still a difficult shot to make even in good conditions.

3
Boruzu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just turn on V.A.T.S. mode and target limbs, hoping the illegal will drop and respawn rare loot.

2
Taylor3006 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well as long as it is what a "reasonable man" would do. That standard protects us from morons who would use a hunting rifle to retrieve a water bottle from a thief a mile away............... The reasonable man standard applies to all Texas criminal laws.

2
TheTPL 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what dogs are for, take down the perp and retrieve your water bottle 😁

2
KeepWomanAtHome 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have cornhole doctrine

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

judging by how fat some of them are, they have a White Castle doctrine

-2
rupok2 -2 points ago +3 / -5

yes it does but it doesnt apply to land, only your house or car where you are currently dwelling.

7
Test_user21 7 points ago +10 / -3

Wrong.

Stop giving out legal advice.

If you feel threatened on your land/unimproved property, you can defend your livelihood w the force you feel is necessary to defend it. You can always defend your person w the force you feel is necccesary, you can defend your car the same way.

If a person has no legal right to be on your front porch, you can shoot to kill. if they are near your threshold and you have no porch, go ahead and shoot, but make sure the cops find the corpse beyond the threshold.

6
Pissed_American 6 points ago +8 / -2

You don't understand what the "castle doctrine" is about. It specifically refers to your dwelling. Those other things you mentioned have more to do with "stand your ground". I'm not saying there aren't instances where it's legal to blow someone away in your yard.

Even California has a castle doctrine law that protects you if you have to use lethal force to defend yourself inside your home.

2
Urusovite 2 points ago +4 / -2

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

YES, you can shoot trespassers. YES, you can shoot burglars who have fled. YES, you can use deadly force to defend yourself and your property. YES, you can do both of those any place you are legally allowed to be.

1
Test_user21 1 point ago +2 / -1

I live in Texas, and I know the law. Texas has "more" than the Castle doctrine, you can use whatever force you deem necessary to prevent the culmination of any felony in the State of Texas.

Go get some educatin' before you make silly statements...

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say that you couldn't do that in Texas. I said what the castle doctrine is specifically referring to. Like I said, California has a castle doctrine.

And just because you live in Texas doesn't mean you know jack shit about law. Most people are completely wrong when it comes to what's legal and what's not. I don't take anyone's advice online. Unless it's a lawyer or something.

1
Test_user21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Texas does not have a castle doctrine, it has a statewide authorization of use -of-force that anyone can use to prevent the culmination of a felony.

FFS, I explained it to you, twice before this. In the future please do the .win community a favor and actually read replies to your statements.

The very first thing I said to you was to stop giving out legal advice - that should have been a clue you didn't understand how things are, and that I would inform you how they are.

0
Slingy 0 points ago +1 / -1

From what I remember it's your Home and your Vehicle. You can chase the suspect ONLY if you do not recognize them. You shoot to kill intruders and or threats. If they're on your porch make sure to bring them in the house before the police get there.

2
rupok2 2 points ago +5 / -3

you should stop giving out false legal advice. You cannot shoot anybody who transpasses on your property in texas without proof of threatening behavior or your life is in danger. Whereas, if they break into or attempt to break into your car, house or place of dwelling it is assumed they are a threat to your life and you are automatically allowed to use deadly force.

1
Test_user21 1 point ago +1 / -0

I TOLD YOU TO STOP GIVING OUT LEGAL ADVICE FOR A REASON.

In Texas, you can use whatever fore you deem necessary to prevent the culmination of any felony anywhere in the State - anywhere.

Specifically on your dwelling, you can shoot to kill anyone on your porch.

4
Urusovite 4 points ago +5 / -1

No, it applies to anywhere you are legally allowed to be. That means public street, sidewalks, house, neighbors where you are given permission, etc.

0
rupok2 0 points ago +2 / -2

only if you are defending yourself. You can't just shoot someone who transpasses on your property. In those cases you have to prove you were defending yourself or felt threatened. The difference if you were in your car or house its assumed automatically that the person who is trying to break in is threatening your life.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

after my grandfather died, grandma had to live by herself in the city

being from rural MO, she of course had a gun and would damned well use it

she asked a cop if it was legal to shoot someone who had a gun if he was in her yard

The cop said, "Just be sure to drag them onto the porch"

1
Urusovite 1 point ago +3 / -2

Easy to do. You asked them to leave first, they refused, you feared for your life and shot them without intent to kill but oops their head blew up anyway.

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

YES, you can shoot trespassers. YES, you can shoot burglars who have fled. YES, you can use deadly force to defend yourself and your property. YES, you can do both of those any place you are legally allowed to be.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you are across town and someone presents a threat you can shoot them

9
AVeryNakedMan 9 points ago +9 / -0

In order for something to truly be illegal, a jury has to be willing to convict the person who does it.

Imagine trying to convince a jury that a mom with her little kids at home shouldn't have defended them from a burglar.

4
T-Bear 4 points ago +4 / -0

^^^THIS^^^

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

try to convince the DA to risk his political aspirations and charge them

5
Taylor3006 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is because deadly force isn't allowed for trespassing in Texas. This person shot was committing criminal mischief at night and attempted burglary of a residence and you can use deadly force to stop it. There are many instances where there are defenses to the use of deadly force in Texas. Learn the laws where you live. Essentially in Texas it is a defense to the use of deadly force to overcome others use of unlawful force to protect life, life of others, and property. Trespassing isn't inherently damaging to property. If they are trespassing and destroying or stealing property, it is no longer trespassing.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is a sign by the side of the road in WV that is made to look like the usual welcome to the state sign

but someone modified it to say "Welcome to West Virginia, If you shoot us, we'll kill you. And we have plenty of room to bury the body."

3
Earlie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only in Austin

50
ThunderInYourHeart 50 points ago +50 / -0

Who tf would try to break into a home in Texas. That’s next level stupid lol.

25
Themis595 25 points ago +25 / -0

An illegal unfamiliar with the ways of Texas?

5
Geralt_of_Rivia1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Texas has a lot of cucks.

-2
astrosloth -2 points ago +1 / -3

Now i know you are boomer fag.

Weren't you just bragging you work 5 hours a week and hit the federal pay cap and don't do shit?

Thanks for being part of the problem.

2
Geralt_of_Rivia1 2 points ago +4 / -2

Ah yes, hate boomers, said on a place to worship the ideal boomer, Donald Trump

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

when you see the handshake, you can just assume it is a shill or some Gab refugee here to stir shit

-1
astrosloth -1 points ago +2 / -3

Not all boomers ...just dumb out of touch ones that really have no idea what is going on and just act like they do.

Nice strawmen argument as well. How dare your filthy mouth say Donald;s name. Go kiss your boyfriend 50 times as penance.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

some savage from a place where everyone steals at will

4
KekistanPM 4 points ago +4 / -0

They probably thought San Antonio was liberal democrat from end-to-end.

This is also why I'll never buy a house so close to a park. I like to hike trails big and small, and a number of small ones run parallel and nearly adjacent to private homes. Some of the smaller trailheads are located in neighborhoods in-between houses, too.

3
ChocolateEvryday 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weirdos tend to hang out at parks too. Always watch your kids closely.

2
memechallenger33 2 points ago +2 / -0

South side of San Antonio can be really crime ridden. She had every reason to believe the intruder was a gang member and not just a drunk teenager.

39
whataboob 39 points ago +39 / -0

The burglary gone wrong ...

Huh?

More like

The burglary gone right ...

10
FightTheSWAMP 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's exactly what I said when I read that. That's literally the best outcome we could hope for in thus situation.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

she and the kids are safe, a thug will no longer be plaguing society, that's a win-win

5
conservatarian 5 points ago +5 / -0

My thoughts exactly!

5
TommyJarvis 5 points ago +5 / -0

lol I made the exact same comment

2
CnnWillBlackmailYou 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, from the media's perspective, the only "right" burglary is one that leaves conservatives and their children dead.

-1
catsfive -1 points ago +1 / -2

I have made a big mistake

34
King5150 34 points ago +34 / -0

great news...hahahahaha...moron played a very silly game in Texas and that prize he won was the last thing he will ever hear......LOL. 🔫 day!

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

play stupid games, win stupid gunshot wounds

29
SuitableHumanSoul 29 points ago +29 / -0

i hope he was an illegal criminal immigrant. because that would chalk up a fucking kill for one of them.

FUCK EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS AND FUCK THE ILLEGAL BIDEN ADMINSTRATION!!!!

18
RabidZoo 18 points ago +18 / -0

Now you have about 49,999,999 to go.

9
TommyJarvis 9 points ago +9 / -0

I hope not because the commie DA in San Antonio will go after her even harder than they certainly will already.

It may be state law that there is a defense to prosecution in use of deadly force, but that doesn’t stop the commie DAs from filing charges anyway. Ask the soldier who shot the AK wielding antifa rioter in Austin. Fat fuck pointed an AK at him and he’s still fighting charges.

7
SuitableHumanSoul 7 points ago +7 / -0

the DA needs to be executed then, the enemy of the state.

-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +1 / -2

welcome to p.win where we think anyone we don't like is an enemy of the state needs to be executed

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

That Commie DA in San Antonio will take a hard pass on this one.

He may be a gun-grabbing Commie, but he ain't stupid enough to prosecute a case that has absolutely no chance of reaching a conviction with a jury.

1
Geralt_of_Rivia1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blacks are more likely

27
CmonGubMintGibMe 27 points ago +27 / -0

Glad the mom didn't think twice. Who knows what that monster would've done to her and her children.

18
Here_we_go 18 points ago +18 / -0

She did think twice. Once for each shot.

9
8bit_mixtape 9 points ago +9 / -0

She thought 1 more for good measure

4
BigMikesSwingingCock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Double tap. Nice.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
23
TheTexan 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yeah, I read the San Antonio newspaper story about it. When the cops got there he was sitting in a chair in her backyard bleeding out.

Good for her.

5
ChocolateEvryday 5 points ago +5 / -0

What a jerk. Go bleed elsewhere.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +6 / -2

i'd put that chair in my front yard as a warning to the next guy

23
Platos_Cave 23 points ago +24 / -1

God Bless her

2
chelthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mom of the Year!

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

Smith and Wesson blessed her

21
556x45mm 21 points ago +22 / -1

Jogging through the park

Jogging through a hole in the fence

Stretch

Jogging through a laundry room

Jogging to the grave

2
Deadline 2 points ago +3 / -1

No jogging was mentioned.

20
TommyJarvis 20 points ago +20 / -0

That means jogging was involved

5
Reefay 5 points ago +5 / -0

Coulter Rule

20
Jfreak7 20 points ago +20 / -0

Shot twice? Were there no more rounds available?

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
10
Geralt_of_Rivia1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Handguns put holes in people, rifles put holes through people, shotguns take a chunk out of people and put that chunk of flesh on the floor behind them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

i want to start a charity that distributes free laser sights down in the hood

it would increase the gangstas kill ration and offer protection to innocent bystanders

3
ChocolateEvryday 3 points ago +3 / -0

Laser Sights to Save a Life

1
Geralt_of_Rivia1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give them grenades

4
Ale_and_Mead 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. Handguns are great for carrying around town, and rifles are great for if shit ever truly hits the fan, but shotguns are the king of home defense. My ideal home defense setup would be a shotgun, each loaded with buckshot, staged in every feasible room. Shot won't likely overpenetrate (like slugs easily could), and any hit on any body part is decent. Crooks tend (not always, but most often) to give up even if a firearm misses, or a hit is scored on, say, the bicep. Well, for those who might not give up so easily, there's a huge difference between being hit with a handgun or rifle in the bicep and a shotgun pretty much blowing off your arm.

Shotguns, folks. We always talk about rifles and handguns here, it seems, but the home defense kings need some love too.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +3 / -2

"All you need to do is go out on the porch and fire a shotgun into the air" - Joe Biden

3
jeffj95 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Just put 2 blasts in the air ya stupid bastards! Jill, where's my pudding?"

3
Ale_and_Mead 3 points ago +3 / -0

That advice is some of the dumbest I can imagine someone thinking of, let alone giving. Let's walk through the faulty thought process Biden had there (note that not all points are faulty):

  1. Someone is giving me reason to believe they're breaking into my home, conceivably to steal from me, and they might not be averse to causing me harm.

  2. I have shotguns.

  3. Shotguns are good defense tools.

  4. Let me walk outside my locked home, the single place I have the greatest advantages over anyone seeking to do me harm, and waste ammunition by discharging my shotgun into the air, which does nothing to eliminate any threat, and in fact gives a fast enough person ample time to charge and disarm me, or shoot me while I'm aiming my gun in the air like a fucking mouth-breathing idiot.

Half of Biden's advice was decent enough (the recognition that shotguns are valuable defensive tools), but the rest was complete and utter fucking garbage.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

don't forget this came from someone who is surrounded by some of the best security professionals in the world

14
altaG12 14 points ago +14 / -0

Due to inflation, ammo is getting expensive

3
memechallenger33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent point.

8
TargetsOfInterest 8 points ago +9 / -1

State was TX, sir. We can aim.

6
GrizzlyT55 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have you seen ammo prices? This woman was on a budget!

4
Philhelm 4 points ago +4 / -0

One to the head, one to the heart.

20
TrumpPatriotFl 20 points ago +20 / -0

In UK she would have been raped, murdered, and the perp set free to not offend anyone..

Most in Europe don't understand our love of the 2A, this is it exactly, it has fuck all to do with hunting and everything to do with tyranny in all forms.

Be armed instead of a victim.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

In UK she would have been raped, murdered, and the perp set free to not offend anyone..

and her body would be sentenced to prison for denying housing to an immigrant

16
5121313 [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

Back Up Link: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/san-antonio-texas-mother-intruder-dead-b2069539.html

Burglary gone wrong unfolded on Thursday night in the southeast side of San Antonio city when the man allegedly tried to enter the woman’s home through a laundry room.

Police said the woman, who is in her 30s, was home alone with her three children at the time and heard the man breaking in.

She grabbed a gun and shot the intruder twice in the chest.

Archive Back Up Link: https://archive.ph/fMRkD

12
Hanging_Chad 12 points ago +12 / -0

allegedly tried

At what point are they allowed to not add "allegedly"?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
memechallenger33 3 points ago +3 / -0

When they are not saying she committed a crime?

3
AussieTrumpFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

When the perp is not ventilated.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

when the person is found guilty

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Pearls_Swine 11 points ago +12 / -1

I can't forget the day when I was a teenager living with my parents. My mom and sister were in the garage doing laundry with the garage door open. A drugged out black guy sees my sister and immediately starts approaching her calling her by some random name. My mom and sister immediately close the door and run to my dad.

My dad then gets his gun and from the window tells the guy to leave or he'll get shot. The black dude (still outside our house) takes out a knife and accidentally cuts himself. He's now bleeding out as he continues to call a woman's name. The police get there about a minute later and arrest him.

I just remember seeing his blood all over our driveway. It was disgusting. Knowing my dad, this guy would have been dead if he tried to break in.

3
memechallenger33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Future Darwin Award recipient there. Glad you and fam were safe.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

he should have been dindu burger the instant he pulled that knife

11
MasterChef 11 points ago +16 / -5

I feel sorry for her upcoming murder charge from our totally legitimate justice system

17
TheTexan 17 points ago +18 / -1

This is Texas. That ain't happening.

10
covfefe_in_ur_cup 10 points ago +10 / -0

San Antonio is blue as fuck though.

16
Urusovite 16 points ago +19 / -3

Doesn't matter. Texas laws get even looser at night. You can chase a target and kill them (without intent to kill) to retrieve property that has been stolen. Doesn't matter how blue the city is. Easy win in court.

EDIT for the downvote from a retard

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

YES, you can shoot trespassers. YES, you can shoot burglars who have fled. YES, you can use deadly force to defend yourself and your property. YES, you can do both of those any place you are legally allowed to be.

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Talk to me about the soldier who shot the AK wielding antifa rioter. He pointed an AK at him and the soldier is seeing charges.

You are in a fantasy world if you think the DAs can’t file charges, even in cases of clear self defense.

6
Urusovite 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those charges will be dropped. DAs can lose. They like to posture

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

But you still get bled dry by the system fighting it

5
wethedownvoted 5 points ago +5 / -0

like nancy says, "the process is the punishment"

4
T-Bear 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, yes, charges can be filed, and the DA can severely abuse the system with malicious prosecution - just like they did with Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, WI, and with this Army soldier in Austin.

The thing is, every DA in the corrupt system saw what happened in Kyle's prosecution, and really does not want to be repeat performance in getting such a case to court.

All the man in the Austin case needs to do is petition he cannot get a fair trial in Austin. He wins either way.

If they proceed with prosecution and the change of venue is denied, he has ample evidence to sue for malicious prosecution under Texas' very clear and flexible Castle/self-defense laws at night facing an armed intruder showing every intent to fire his weapon in a life-threatening situation.

Any prosecution with a change of venue outside of Austin will result in a not guilty verdict.

This case is a slam dunk for all except the Antifa/BLM crowds.

3
TheTexan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, but they can't supersede state law.

3
TommyJarvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes it is. San Antonio has commie DA

4
TheTexan 4 points ago +4 / -0

But they can't supersede state law.

1
TommyJarvis 1 point ago +2 / -1

Tell THEM that

4
TheTexan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait and see

2
MasterChef 2 points ago +4 / -2

I hope you are right.

8
altaG12 8 points ago +8 / -0

Article says no charges are expected against her.

1
TommyJarvis 1 point ago +3 / -2

Just wait

2
TheTPL 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's crazy how our justice system actually encourages people to simply become criminals. Upstanding citizens who are nothing but honest far too often get jammed up, so it's better to say nothing at all or flatout lie.

10
warlord30 10 points ago +10 / -0

The article starts with...

"Burglary gone wrong"

Shitlib news article.

10
OnlyTrump20 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's why it's a good idea to keep thorny plants around the perimeter of your yard where bad guys can sneak in.

10
IncredibleMrE1 10 points ago +10 / -0

One less cockroach infesting the country. Nice job, lady.

10
Cheesemaker 10 points ago +10 / -0

"If somebody breaks in your house in Santa Rosa County Texas and you shoot and kill them, the chances of them re-offending after that are zero, and we like those odds"

9
Phoenixrwds 9 points ago +9 / -0

Article calls it a burglary gone wrong, that's a burglary gone right!

9
Christineblaseyford 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well, I hope it fucking hurt.

9
DJTorNothing 9 points ago +9 / -0

You must be a piece of fucking shit out of their damn mind trying to break into the house of someone. The terror, traumatic experience, fear, horror of someone or some People experiencing that. FUCK YOU!

8
TrumpIncitedErection 8 points ago +8 / -0

Uninfringed.

8
dykstra89 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hero mom. I'd bring her to the White house and give her a medal if I was prez

8
Trumpman1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't mess with Texas.

8
TrumpWinz 8 points ago +8 / -0

he dindu nuffin. wuz a good boy. gonna be a rocket surgeon.

7
BostonVoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

God Bless her and the small children

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

Mossberg was watching over her

7
Vlad_The_Impaler 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Guns are bad! She should have been unarmed! Guns are dangerous! " - DemoKKKrat Fraudster wishing she and her kids were killed

7
c_programmer 7 points ago +7 / -0

One shot one kill... The second one was for fun because what's life without whimsy?

2
jeffj95 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anchor shot

7
COanon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good going Mom. Maybe these criminals will learn not to break in someone's home. Like a box of chocolate, you never know what you will get.

7
PapaPepe 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you have to shoot, make sure they're not going to live to sue you.

3
GuerillaYourDreams 3 points ago +3 / -0

And that slimy bastard Benjamin Crump sits down with their family members, and they all decide to sue you instead!!

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

that's exactly what the cops do

"aim for center body mass" has nothing to do with protecting bystanders

it has to do with not spending $Ms to support some dindu for the rest of his life

6
JoeBidensDementia1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Twice? Did her gun jam? WTF.

5
IHatePedophiles 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was a shotgun. One to drop, one to finish. EZ PZ

5
Thep1mp 5 points ago +6 / -1

You never mag dump into a perp. Keep rounds ready in case he has friends around you haven’t seen yet. You can always shoot him again if needed.

4
memechallenger33 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup. Don’t want to try reloading in a situation like that.

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

The burglary gone wrong unfolded at around 10pm on Thursday night in the southeast side of San Antonio

More like “The burglary gone right”!

6
EatMyBallsAmerican 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sounds like a jogger will never jog again.

6
RobinNet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Too bad the woman Saint Fentanyl Floyd tied to a chair and pistol-whipped didn't pull out a .357 and plug him and his homies 8 times.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
learntocode 6 points ago +6 / -0

Another brave future astronaut whose life was snuffed out by gun violence.

6
PaigeAshley 6 points ago +6 / -0

So, so happy this brave woman and her children are safe! God bless her for having the courage and strength to do what had to be done to protect her family!

6
SNRNXS 6 points ago +6 / -0

I like how this is called a "Burglary gone wrong" in the article. What, so a burglary gone right would've been the thief stole some shit and potentially harmed or killed the mom and her kids?

6
RabidZoo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good shoot!

6
Headhunte1sAheadOfIt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let's flip Cali Oregon and Washington so we can get our 2A back

6
Earlie 6 points ago +6 / -0

The burglary gone wrong

Well that's a matter of opinion, ain't it

6
Urusovite 6 points ago +6 / -0

Texas law:

Sections 9.41 & 9.42 of the Texas Penal Code

These two statutes define the Castle Doctrine as follows:

9.41 explains what constitutes trespassing and interfering with property, which can extend to theft, carjacking, and extreme acts with intent to cause destruction, such as arson

9.42 justifies the use of deadly force to protect property AND in situations when there’s substantial risk of serious injury or death

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/gun-laws/stand-your-ground

https://www.uslawshield.com/defend-property-texas/

YES, you can shoot trespassers. YES, you can shoot burglars who have fled. YES, you can use deadly force to defend yourself and your property. YES, you can do both of those any place you are legally allowed to be.

5
ChynahIzAzzhole 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ruh-Roh... a soros funded da runs that town... I hope she'll be OK.

5
DarkPepe1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Twice? Must've had a 45 👍

5
weme06 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol

4
DarkPepe1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

See what I did there?

4
LindaSarsourCunt 4 points ago +4 / -0

I did. Quite clever.

2
DarkPepe1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek!

5
americaeffyeah 5 points ago +5 / -0

America, Fuck Yeah!

4
PacificElectric 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dead burglars don’t reoffend

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +4 / -1

shooting them is the perfect rehab program

4
caw_86 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do they think this is 1980’s california or something, how stupid can one be

4
kent 4 points ago +5 / -1

Hopefully he didn't die right away and realized how stupid he was.

4
Lightning10000 4 points ago +4 / -0

In my state the headline would have been

"illegal gun owner claims self defense on burglar who posed no harm"

4
T-Bear 4 points ago +4 / -0

If I were printing the headline, it would read:

"Homeowner successfully defends her childrens' lives by shooting an invading burglar".

Because THAT'S what really happened.

4
turdinthepunch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Room temp = body temp