3587
Comments (826)
sorted by:
700
RedditStillSucks 700 points ago +700 / -0

Extreme ideas like:

-Free speech

-Not teaching 3rd graders about anal

-Not murdering babies

-And men don't turn into women just because they chop their dicks off.

221
citizen667 221 points ago +221 / -0

I am the extremist who knocks.

289
BillPigg 289 points ago +289 / -0

The tactic is "Accuse others of that which you are guilty of."

In other words = "This Democratic Party is the most extremist in History."

95
Mothertrumprr 95 points ago +95 / -0

Which they absolutely are. We're only a few laws away from another great leap forward.

6
Long_time_lurker 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was told that wasn't real communism.

Of course I've also read about people killed by the Khmer Rouge saying "how is this freedom? how is this equality?" right before they shot them and ate their livers.

38
TravelingSalesman 38 points ago +39 / -1

Reminds me of the "you smelt it, you dealt it" principal that we learned as kids.

12
MrM4590 12 points ago +12 / -0

You did the rhyme you did the crime.

11
Meddlesom 11 points ago +11 / -0

You denied it, you supplied it.

5
FromSethWithLove 5 points ago +5 / -0

You said it, you let it

5
Christineblaseyford 5 points ago +5 / -0

Door knob!

1
MrM4590 1 point ago +1 / -0

You suspected it you projected it.

2
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dead skunk in the middle of the road

17
SaltyKrakenBalls 17 points ago +17 / -0

Absolute truth. He doesn't have the stones to debate his point or point out what is extreme about it. By this, he is a worthless clone that shits out corrupt talking points.

15
engineerdon 15 points ago +16 / -1

Yes. This right here.

Straight from Joseph Goebbels.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
engineerdon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hold on, this bares some discussion...

Indeed, I've read that in a transcript of one of Goebbels' speeches.

Do you know the specifics on that? What were the allies supposedly accusing the Nazis of that the allies themselves were doing? I don't know.

If that's not the case, Goebbels' speech is a delightful recursive meta-claim.

I'm sure Goebbels described it in other cases behind closed doors, and I'm pretty sure we lots of cases of the Nazis operating this way.

I don't claim to be a WWII expert, though, so I'd like to hear from folks who have studied this.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

#MeToo

I do know quite a bit about WWII including directly from people who were there on all sides except Soviet, but I've never gone down their propaganda rabbit hole.

0
Liberals_R_Idiots 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did Goebbels chop his dick off and gobble it whole?

8
RedditIs4Retards 8 points ago +8 / -0

.... As they openly talk about the great reset

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
46
Error404 46 points ago +46 / -0

They hate us cause they anus.

42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
17
Ayyyyyyyyyyyyysuckit 17 points ago +17 / -0

Isn't the address of Nancy Pelosi's new mansion in West Palm?

13
FireannDireach 13 points ago +13 / -0

Damn it. You had ONE job, go along with the joke...

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to know the joke about his screen name.

10
Choomguy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lol

4
Mikespenis123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Drones away!

1
SirBuzzKillingtonVI 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're damn right.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many days did you get in at Killington this season?

112
harley_dyna 112 points ago +113 / -1

Meanwhile, the democrats literally created/were/are the KKK

66
Thetigerpoppy 66 points ago +66 / -0

They are just mad because the movement actually has the potential to finally put an end to the Roosevelt Era and return America to what its suppose to be

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats haven't been this mad since they lost their slaves.

2
Thetigerpoppy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Says a lot that they get so mad they might not be able to kill babies (particularly black 1s if the dtats are to be believed) that the level of anger is compared to how angry they got when they were told they couldn't own black people anymore..

They also got pretty angry about not being able to censor people on Twitter and being told they aren't allowed to rig elections...

The Dems are really not the nicest bunch

36
toqer 36 points ago +36 / -0

I get some pretty extremist reactions from Democrats when I point out that fact. The Democrat party was all but a joke after the civil war for 100 years until they started begging across the aisle for money to fix issues they created.

What changed? When the Republicans told them, "we're not giving you a dime to fix redlining, Jim Crow and segregation" the Democrats flipped the script by telling minorities, "see? Republicans bad, they don't want to give you money for free shit"

5
wwwchae 5 points ago +5 / -0

Redlining?

17
DisbandTheCIA 17 points ago +17 / -0

Term they came up with to steal bank money if the bank makes sound financial decisions.

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/578088-trustmark-bank-to-pay-5-million-redlining-fine/

Liberals don't understand anything so they think banks care more about race than money.

6
toqer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Redlining was the practice of banks refusing to give home loans in certain neighborhoods, usually black, always democrat run cities.

15
ThomasJackson 15 points ago +15 / -0

Because they didn't pay them back. Not because of race.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
4
CoupeFL 4 points ago +4 / -0

If we finally answered the Jewish question, the black problem would take care of itself.

3
N_I_G_G_A_T_R_O_N 3 points ago +4 / -1

We really are living in some dystopian hellscape aren’t we?

1
BetterNameUnfound 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fed.

8
Dallasguy 8 points ago +9 / -1

They would refuse to give loans to certain areas that were below a certain threshold. Borrowers who might have paid off their debts were excluded because of their neighbors. It’s lazy and discriminatory.

5
ThomasJackson 5 points ago +6 / -1

Gorsh. You mean living in a shit hole area can reduce opportunities you have in life?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I advocate for pushing extremist reactions from demonrats. Eyeball them, right in their face. Knock them to the ground if necessary, helpful, or just fun. Give no quarter! They should be afraid to show their face in public. They should be called out as Marxists and pedophiles.

"Disney's," LGB, NPCs, all this is too subtle for their smooth brains to decipher. And they know no shame. Or respect.

Fear is all they can fathom.

8
engineerdon 8 points ago +8 / -0

The KKK was the militant arm of the democrat party.

Just like Antifa.

Different colored hoods, though.

Excuse me, that's "hoods of color".

4
NateBedfordForrest 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can confirm.

1
SALTYBALLS 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said recent history, like as in a day ago 🤣🤣

88
Spez_Isacuck 88 points ago +90 / -2

More extreme than:

• Black Lives Matter looters

• Antifa rioters

• Weather Underground bombers

• Democrat Ku Klux Klan

• Democrat secessionist Confederacy

40
DystopianDoubleThink 40 points ago +40 / -0

Those are extremely fiery but peaceful.

11
BigFreedomBoner 11 points ago +11 / -0

You got crack a few eggs to make an omelette with eggshells in it.

Also, there is no omelette.

5
trump4life2024 5 points ago +7 / -2

Which is why I don't quite understand when some conservatives were so outraged about the Confederate flag being banned, or by the removal of monuments that celebrate the Confederacy.

12
TheFountainhead 12 points ago +12 / -0

I hear you, but if I may shed a little light: the leftists already redefine words daily because we let them start with “please don’t say faggot or retard, it’s offensive”. If we let them begin to revise history and erase monuments that point to that history, that opens the door to them revising any history. Did I just make a slippery slope argument? Yes. Why? Because it’s a legitimate argument proven time and time again.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

If anybody asked me nicely not to say faggot or retard I would say "sure thing, faggot retard."

Final answer, unless they want to fight about it. I'd end it quick then scream in their ear a while asking them if they think it's a good idea to try that again. Nothing less than total intimidation and dominance solves this. Nation wide.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
trump4life2024 1 point ago +3 / -2

The thing with Confederate monuments is that they have been erected decades after the Civil War ended by organizations like the Daughters of the Confederacy in order to celebrate the Confederacy. They aren't contemporary historical records.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is an area of history I haven't looked at much and never would have without Charlottesville. Like everything else the left ever does, they really did NOT want me investigating this ...

5
Meddlesom 5 points ago +5 / -0

...because of Reconciliation. The entire purpose was to repatriate the confederate states, including the confederate soldiers who were in fact also American veterans. It was essential to heal the country and unify it. The banning of symbols and tearing down of statues is being done for the sole purpose of tearing open those old wounds and dividing the country again.

Get it now?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

This can't be true because of the timing. It took decades after the Civil War was over before those monuments were built.

I have no idea what it's like to live in the South, ever; but those soldiers had to get on with life without said monuments.

Note that I'm not saying it's a good idea to remove ancient landmarks. The Bible speaks to this very thing and is 100% relevant now. Further notice that statues were torn down regardless who or what they commemorated! This is hard evidence that what we're dealing with is the original French philosophy of anarchy, which has the goal of removing western civilization entirely and replacing it with nothing. Obviously, the maddening horde in the street is not aware of this.

0
trump4life2024 0 points ago +1 / -1

But if the statues were a concession to those who supported the Confederacy, why would their removal anger someone who opposes the Confederacy?

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

...because of Reconciliation. The entire purpose was to repatriate the confederate states, including the confederate soldiers who were in fact also American veterans. It was essential to heal the country and unify it. The banning of symbols and tearing down of statues is being done for the sole purpose of tearing open those old wounds and dividing the country again.

Get it now?

0
trump4life2024 0 points ago +1 / -1

But if the statues were a concession to those who supported the Confederacy, why would their removal anger someone who opposes the Confederacy?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no Confederacy to oppose. The whole thing is very strange and unique to the US only in that it's about the only war fought entirely by Americans.

Realize the roots of this are the French philosophy of anarchy which has the goal of destroying western civilization entirely and replacing it with nothing. The fact that statues commemorating people who were instrumental in ending slavery were also torn down by angry mobs and unopposed by law enforcement tells us that we're up against exactly this, in terms of who's pulling the strings and paying for it.

While I don't care about Civil War "heroes," (traitors?) this ideology is our direct enemy. Those who own the Fed moreso.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've answered your question twice now.

2
Dallasguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

What don’t you understand?

0
trump4life2024 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why conservatives would want to protect the legacy of the Confederacy and monuments that celebrate it.

11
Dallasguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Partially for history. Partially because it was what the north allowed as part of the postwar agreement. Partially because 99 percent of the families who lost loved ones in the war never owned a slave. The battle flag they banned was because of a single mass shooting.

Personally I’m against the destruction of monuments because I doubt the motives of democrats is to do anything but erase and rewrite history. In 50 years textbooks will be teaching kids that slave owners and the kkk were republicans.

4
Loc12 4 points ago +5 / -1

50 years? Do you mean today

1
trump4life2024 1 point ago +3 / -2

Honestly, I'm not really convinced by the argument about monuments being necessary to preserve history. For example this is the statue of Robert E Lee in Charlottesville: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/Lee_Park%2C_Charlottesville%2C_VA.jpg There isn't really that much information one can gain from that statue besides an approximate likeness of E Lee and the years of his birth and his death. If someone should decide to rewrite textbooks, the statue wouldn't IMHO really make much of a difference.

1
Dallasguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

1
sanmannight 1 point ago +2 / -1

And Robert E Lee was a good man, one who deserves to be recognized not vilified and disappeared. The world was a different place at that point, one in which it mattered what state you called home. Unlike today, that really mattered.

“If Virginia stands by the old Union,” Lee told a friend, “so will I. But if she secedes (though I do not believe in secession as a constitutional right, nor that there is sufficient cause for revolution), then I will follow my native State with my sword, and, if need be, with my life.”

When Lee read the news that Virginia had joined the Confederacy, he said to his wife, “Well, Mary, the question is settled,” and resigned the U.S. Army commission he had held for 32 years.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is one valid point. The left used the argument and it might be the best they've ever had. About anything.

Still, the way to change things is civilly, not by going for mob rule. They REALLY don't want us engaging them on that level!

Simply by bypassing due process, we should reciprocate by killing them all. This is the way history works. Deviation from that is unnatural.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

I'm not familiar with this postwar agreement. It took decades before said monuments were built. That doesn't seem like part of any peace treaty that affected any battleground to me.

2
Dallasguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was part of reconstruction. I don’t know what to tell you. The north decided to let the south have their monuments and their heritage rather than punishing them because they thought it would be too divisive. Imagine the irony that modern democrats would be the ones screeching to destroy southern democrat heritage.

1
Plugthegamey 1 point ago +2 / -1

The men of the south didn't die to keep black people as slaves in their country. They were fighting to secede from states like New york. Less than 2% of white people owned slaves and we're supposed to believe that more Americans died in this war than any other because they were evil racists.

1
trump4life2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

So was the Confederacy an evil thing perpetuated by the Democrats like the OP says, or was it just a fight for states rights?

1
CoupeFL 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a fight for states rights that went back decades before the shooting started.

People here seem to forget that Lincoln Republicans were the originators of the federal bureaucracy and big government at the expense of the states. It’s a shame really.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

State's rights which included the right to own slaves. At the time, slaves were the single most valuable asset in the South, and it wasn't even close. Don't gloss over this part of it! It's just as wrong as glossing over the rest, which includes northern States pressing their economic advantage which impoverished southerners.

And yes the Federal government grew through that war. And of course it never gave up its gains.

0
CoupeFL 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m not glossing over slavery. To the contrary, I support slavery

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. Muh mean tweets! They can't even. They literally lost their ability to even.

1
Talon54 1 point ago +24 / -23

Another history challenged idiot parroting his history challenged high school teachers. Read a book or two of actual history regarding the 1850s and 60s. Lincoln was a despot and tyrant. Try reading Lincoln's papers and letters.

14
Checkmate6Romeo 14 points ago +16 / -2

Have to agree with talon here. Whatever you think of Lincoln and his term as president he almost certainly was responsible for one of the largest federal over reaches this country has ever seen. He killed Jeffersonian America regardless of his motives.

4
Dallasguy 4 points ago +5 / -1

There were no good choices. With hindsight, Jefferson would likely have refused to give up the slavery text and the revolution would have gone down differently, if at all.

1
DixMcCoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln%27s_First_Inaugural_Address

...but an association of States in the nature of contract merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One party to a contract may violate it—break it, so to speak; but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it? Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that, in legal contemplation the Union is perpetual confirmed by the history of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And, finally, in 1787 one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was "to form a more perfect Union." But if the destruction of the Union by one or by a part only of the States be lawfully possible, the Union is less perfect than before the Constitution, having lost the vital element of perpetuity. It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void; and that acts of violence, within any State or States, against the authority of the United States, are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances. ...

Must have sounded pretty much like a declaration of war on the South, but I've must read more. Very interesting.

Seems like United States (The People) is always non-interventionalist until the people are rallied behind something or prodded to go in a direction which is declared by a federal official to be in their "best interests":

USS Maine, Pearl Harbor, Kuwait, 9/11 + Iraqi "WMDs", these sorts of things (yeah I've missed / excluded a bunch).

9
Spez_Isacuck 9 points ago +16 / -7

Try dilating.

-1
CoupeFL -1 points ago +1 / -2

He’s right, though

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, he’s a faggot using a pedantic tangent to derail a valid point.

“Ackchually…”

-1
CoupeFL -1 points ago +1 / -2

Better brush up on your history, statist

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oohh I better huh? What you gonna do? 🌈🤡🔫

-7
Talon54 -7 points ago +14 / -21

Try educating yourself. Ignorance is not an asset.

9
Spez_Isacuck 9 points ago +16 / -7

TrY eDuCAtiNg yOuRseLf. iGnoRaNce iS n0t aN ASSet.

🤡

-2
Talon54 -2 points ago +6 / -8

Proven right by another imbecile.

1
Judiwont 1 point ago +6 / -5

I don't think you were proven right about anyone being an imbecile but you...

3
NikolaiVsevolodovich 3 points ago +4 / -1

A book written when? Within the last decade perhaps?

17
Talon54 17 points ago +20 / -3

There have been over 60,000 books written on the War of Northern Aggression. I have over 300 in my personal library, some written before the war was over. There are also thousands of books regarding the events that led to the war.

The University of North Dakota has the most extensive collection of war era newspapers in the country. If you are near Grand Forks try going to their library. The person responsible for the rescue of these papers was my Historical Research professor.

9
Based_EMT 9 points ago +13 / -4

CIA and FBI shills around here apparently don’t like the truth that Lincoln was a huge faggot and maybe the north were the bad guys here.

Stay mad, faggots.

8
ADAM_SCHITT 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not everything is black and white good guys vs bad guys. If the whole argument is "the north is good, south is bad" vs "the south is good, north is bad" then you're both wrong.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretending that anyone who disagrees with you is necessarily a CIA or FBI shill is no different from SJWs calling anybody who disagrees with them a nazi.

You exclude yourself from the discussion.

5
tom_of_rj_fame 5 points ago +5 / -0

You and Ted Turner - the South was going to free their slaves anyways!

2
odiChamp 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the best way to learn about American history?

Do you have a list of books you recommend?

2
Talon54 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your local library is the best place to start unless you have a lot of money to spend on books. Don't use the internet unless you know you are reading an unedited and unabridged book that is written by a trusted source. There is a lot of misinformation on the internet so be wary of its use as an historical research tool.

There is no definitive list of books and I would never recommend a reading list lest I be accused of steering your research. Go to your local library and look for primary sources. That would be a book written by a trusted source around the time the event you are researching occurred and preferably a firsthand account. But try to find at least two books written from different perspectives.

Newspapers written around the time of the event used to be a great resource but in most cases they don't exist even on microfiche anymore. And since the advent of yellow journalism they can't be trusted either.

Good luck in your research.

P.S. There are books containing original writings of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and many others. They are good reading and will demonstrate how the literacy of our founders surpasses that of most "educated" people today.

2
odiChamp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alright cheers. I had hoped you were going to have an easy answer for me, guess not heh. Already hard enough to make time to read each day, let alone research what exactly I need to read in the first place.

I was about to read Plato's Republic and then found out I have to read a bunch of his other works before it to understand the context.

If there is such a barrier to properly learning American history, then 99.9999% of people will never properly learn about it and that has massive negative consequences for our country, which we can already see with today's political parties (especially democrats of course).

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're in the US your County seat has a law library that maintains ALL records of Congress going ALL the way back! Read Ben Franklin's prayers opening and closing their meetings, George Washington's emergence, Thomas Jefferson's absence.

Not only is this the "original source" you want, but the clerk will be very helpful, delighted just to see an actual human. If funding is cut so these disappear, we're effd.

2
odiChamp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, sweet pro tip, good lookin' out.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Starting with the phrase "war of northern aggression" discredits anything else you might say since the south attacked first. This is known by all sides, not anything in dispute.

It's similar to anyone claiming Putin is not the aggressor in Ukraine. Yes, US could have avoided this since 2007; three administrations didn't. Putin is still the one who rolled tanks over his neighbors and that will never change.

Hopefully you can discuss this reasonably some day, I'm sure you know things about the topic that I don't. What you've done here is a non-starter.

0
Talon54 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well you have certainly demonstrated your ignorance of the origins of the War of Northern Aggression. And your version of what transpired in1861 is only known by people who have never done any research of their own. Your high school history teacher lied to you because they were probably ignorant of the events of 861.

Try reading "The Truth of the War Conspiracy of 1861", it is a short but concise read. Then if you can honestly say it wasn't a war of northern aggression I will recommend a therapist.

So it is unlawful for Russia to invade a neighboring country that is actively researching and designing bio-weapons to use against Russia? I'll bet you have no qualms about the wars we have started half way around the globe with countries that have no border with us and for reasons that are for the benefit of no one but our corrupt government.

As far as discussing this reasonably, it is highly unlikely. You historical and political ignorance have already discredited you.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

So it is unlawful for Russia to invade a neighboring country that is actively researching and designing bio-weapons to use against Russia?

So's law.

I said nothing about "unlawful," you did.

Your inability to read does not demonstrate that you have a superior understanding.

The south was the first to attack, just like Putin. Both were the aggressors. This is not the war of Ukraine aggression, nor was the Civil War a war of northern aggression.

It doesn't get simpler than that, but a southern man has to find a way to fuck it up anyway.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
NateBedfordForrest 0 points ago +6 / -6

Lincoln was a crook, plain and simple that would make even the likes of the MSM/CNN blush.

3
Dallasguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Username checks out.

37
MarxhatedJews 37 points ago +37 / -0

Don't forget supporting women arming themselves. We don't want anyone defenseless. We're hated for not being victimized willingly.

6
CoffeeIsForClosers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Unlike liberal whites (lowercase because I don't respect them) who sacrifice themselves.

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do the same!

1
DixMcCoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, the victimization (in the 'abortion leak case', rape) is fine so long as the rapist either wears a condom, doesn't get pregnant, or have easy access to abortion. Apparently. At least, that's what I'm hearing.

1
MarxhatedJews 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the patriarchy!

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Male rapists can get pregnant too?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
193
onepercenter 193 points ago +195 / -2

fjb

128
AngeredKabar 128 points ago +129 / -1

This isn't a hat, you can say, "Fuck Joe Biden" here.

101
SirJiub 101 points ago +101 / -0

FUCK JOE BIDEN.

39
ThereAreOnly2Genders 39 points ago +39 / -0

The Democratic Party is the most Extreme Political Organization in American History BY FAR!!!

For God's Sake, they DEMAND that children choose if they are a boy or girl and that they have the right to take hormones to break their body and that they have the right to chop off their penis.
Not only do they demand these things, but worse, they demand that YOU accept these things, and they DEMAND that these things be taught, promoted, and normalized to OUR children.

And this is only touching briefly on how Extreme they are.

7
tom_of_rj_fame 7 points ago +7 / -0

And they demand we PAY for these things.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they demand that we go along with their delusion, "respect their pronouns."

13
I_Love_45-70_Gov 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fuck Uncle Sniffy

9
Talon54 9 points ago +9 / -0

......and the horse he rode in on.

4
Trumpsta4 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah fuck AOC too

3
easyonthefiber 3 points ago +3 / -0

No one wants to fuck that horse. Neigh, not even AOC would, or Chelsea Hubbel!

3
JiubUnbound 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dagoth Biden: "The Nerevarine Prophecy is the most extreme ideology that's existed in Vvardenfell history."
*Sixth House cultists running wild in the streets*
*Camonna Tong goons marching skooma mules openly up the Bitter Coast*
*a flood of filthy Outlanders and various and sundry n'wahs flooding in through Seyda Neen*

2
SirJiub 2 points ago +2 / -0

Brother!

14
keepamericagreat102 14 points ago +14 / -0

yep, and to correct "RNC Research" in the quote... its 100's of millions, not 10's of millions.

9
Cheesemaker 9 points ago +9 / -0

You're so extreme!

7
notCIA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hardcore bro

6
PepePinochet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Joe Biden is Ass Hoe!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
27
bratt 27 points ago +27 / -0

I will type out the whole thing.

FUCK JOE BIDEN!!! 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
13
IncredibleMrE1 13 points ago +13 / -0

fjb

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

FootJobBiden 👣𓂸

4
fac1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I had no idea there was a standard emoji of a penis. You learn something new every day...

3
Hanging_Chad 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's the hieroglyph Unicode symbol for phallus

2
eagle-eyes2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feet first, Biden!

4
notCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Flip joe Biden

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +3 / -0

Flame Joe Biden 🔥

12
BigMikesSwingingCock 12 points ago +12 / -0

LGB

2
Hanging_Chad 2 points ago +2 / -0

TQIA

2
Mikespenis123 2 points ago +2 / -0

LHB Let's Hang Brandon

1
Brainz 1 point ago +1 / -0

😂 Fucking dummie

113
MythArcana 113 points ago +114 / -1

Says the Dictator in Chef.

Or should I say Po Tater in Chef? Either way, fuck this commie.

68
Thelongrun 68 points ago +68 / -0

I just watched the clip. To me, this was a rehearsed statement. The question was known in advance, most likely fed to the Mockingbird by Langley. As was the answer, to Biden.

The C.I.A knows MAGA is their biggest threat, and they know that MAGA is at least 100 million strong.

I do believe that the meat puppet just announced the Deep State's intention to declare war against MAGA.

Yes, war is coming.

Our guides in this war will be our Founding Fathers. They knew this day would come. That is precisely why there is a Second Amendment.

The tyrants will fall.

47
War_Hamster 47 points ago +47 / -0

They declared war on MAGA on November 9, 2016.

It's about to be escalated, because they know they're losing.

32
Oback_Barama 32 points ago +32 / -0

There is no going back. They know what they have done. They know that we know what they have done. They know what they deserve for what they did.

This is why DC was turned into a fortress on Jan 20 2021. They will cheat even harder next time, because there is no going back for them.

28
Thelongrun 28 points ago +28 / -0

Excellent comment. The next cheat will be eye-watering, breathtaking and quite possibly brutal. I have to state this again, because many here do not appreciate the deadly serious nature of our situation. We will soon be at war with tyrants, and their minions.

The Midterms and 2024 will be rigged and stolen. We will soon be fighting not only for our freedom, but for our lives, and for our childrens' future.

Trump's endorsements are akin to re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

We need to start preparing, at a local level.

Start talking to your neighbourhood folk.

Start talking.

2
TrannyClausSliceDice 2 points ago +2 / -0

When do you see us going to war? What type of war?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Immediately after we know the next election is stolen. Hopefully you've "been doing battle with" your State legislators since 2020.

One contributor here created a Xcel file that lets you mass mail all of them, one email per State. Use bcc. Let them know that Civil War is certain if they don't insure fair elections THIS November. Do this making it very clear that it's not a personal threat, just something you can't stop. But they can.

2
MoreTorbaLessKushner 2 points ago +3 / -1

This dude fucks ^

Laminate it.

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +11 / -0

Agreed. I'm very much hoping that our efforts to stop the cheating are enough. They were in VA and almost in NJ.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
15
Thelongrun 15 points ago +15 / -0

🎯 They know they are surrounded, threatened and despised by the vast bulk of the adult population. They are in panic mode now. This is when tyrants can be very dangerous indeed, before they are taken down and Mussolini'd.

10
Zskills 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'd prefer a nice Gaddafi-ing for these pedo demons.

Metaphorically speaking of course 🤡

5
Thelongrun 5 points ago +5 / -0

🔥

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hitlerizing would be ok, too! So many on .win want to elevate him to hero status, let's remind them.

2
MoreTorbaLessKushner 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's what Hilldog deserves.

6
Cyer6 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think they're also in a very weakened state. They have a sycophant media but that institution's power is being eroded. They just don't have the power they had just a few years ago. The dems know they are running on borrowed time and only have a short window to jam their communist crap down everyone's throat but a lot of it is failing. The most effective thing they are able to accomplish right now is the destruction of our economy, which is a big problem but we've been there before.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
Thelongrun 7 points ago +7 / -0

Despite the accurate description of the destruction of our country, I find your comment quite optimistic.

This line, in particular, feels me with hope:

'They just don't have the power they had just a few years ago.'

6
TakingBackCA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don’t underestimate your opponent. This is a spiritual war, and it is not their first. The opponent controls every lever of power, from schools and corporate boardrooms to charities and government halls, from bureaucratic offices to military bases.

The opponent is the dog and we are the flea, remember that. We can win, but we need to be fully aware of the shear depth and breadth of power the opponent possesses.

4
BigDiesel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed. More people here need to understand just how important it is to NOT underestimate the enemy.

We're dealing with marxists/globalists who have spread the cancer of tyranny and communism very slowly for 100 years in this country. They literally did it for 100 years almost unnoticed to the public, but Trump's win in 2016 threw a wrench in their plan and ultimately forced them to show their hand and accelerate. They are very skilled at what they do and their plans are as systemic as they are demonic. There is a lot of work left to do from our side. It's okay to celebrate the small victories we've been seeing, but also recognize just how far we truly are from the original, constitutional structure of this nation and government and just how much power these marxists have been able to seize over the preceding decades.

Once we start seeing things like abolishment of federal agencies, insanely dramatic tax cuts, repeals of unconstitutional laws, airtight border security etc. (i can name 100 other items), then we can sigh in relief as we start to see the scales tip in our favor.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're talking about gradual progress as if we could do our own "long march through the institutions." We CAN'T. Know the plans of the enemy! This has to be sudden.

Other than that, great comment.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

We outnumber all their armed forces 100:1. And that's only counting legal gun owners. Your analogy is NOT apt

Still, do not underestimate the enemy.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their sycophants are the weakest beings imaginable.

12
saltyviewer123 12 points ago +12 / -0

Summer of love 2.0. Stock up on food, ammo, bible's, and frens.

10
Thelongrun 10 points ago +10 / -0

This, 100%. They are coming after us. We now have the confirmation.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +3 / -0

You were right.

They'll try and pick us off one by one. We have to protect each other. And spring immediately to the defense of anyone who is attacked.

0
TrannyClausSliceDice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you saying it’s so dire that you need to stock up on food and weapons in the next couple of months? I’m not sure it’ll get so bad as to civil war level in the next 60 days…?

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +9 / -0

Water. Always start your prepping with water.

And frens........

7
2karmalkorn2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Water goes very quickly.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yup, that's why having a purification system is so important.

3
2karmalkorn2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup.

3
NewUser101 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was more of a cold war. They wanted to pull what they did in 2020 in 2016, but were not prepared at the time. Instead decided to try and ruin Trump's presidency and make sure the fix was in for 2020.

The actual declaration of war was in the early AM hours of 11/4/2020. Outright stealing the election and installing Biden was a coup. They are now consolidating power and attempting to do everything to ensure Trump and MAGA can never pose a threat again.

View it this way and it makes sense. It also means we're far behind in countering them. I'm not sure we can fix this with the ballot box.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's a good argument, but I'm sticking with my start date.

When Bill and Hillary showed up for her concession speech wearing the Royal Purple, it signified the color revolution was on. They called it "the resistance", but it was a color revolution.

November 4th was the culmination of that Revolution, and we're now engaged in a war to keep them from getting fully entrenched and taking our country back.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Purple was definitely the color of their revolution. At a protest, I saw someone going into the State Capitol building in a purple suit with a purple tie. I could have easily killed him. I don't know whether to be proud of my restraint or ashamed of my mistake.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're pleased to have you with us here on the outside. There may be other opportunities in the future where such restraint won't be required, although I sure hope we don't get to that point.

5
tom_of_rj_fame 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dude, as a former Langley blue badge, rest assured this isn't coming out of Langley (certainly not the one I was part of). If there was any federal institution where America First could reside it's home is Langley. My guess it's coming out of DOJ/FBI or ODNI/DHS. And those latter 2 abominations created by Bush should be first on the America First chopping block. And the DOJ/FBI needs a mass firing that would make the Church Committee firings look tame.

2
Tyrone_biggums 2 points ago +3 / -1

If there was any federal institution where America First could reside it's home is Langley

This may be the most preposterous declaration I have ever encountered on this message board.

You must have been in one of the outermost of the concentric circles to even be able to say this without busting out laughing….with all due respect….

2
tom_of_rj_fame 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know something I don't? To be sure, I was there a long time ago - 80's under Casey. My speculation is there is still some heart beat at Langley, State is totally NWO, WEF, etc. ODNI? No idea. FBI - 100% political hacks - we hated them even back then as hacks. Your views?

2
tom_of_rj_fame 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well I was there a long time ago, and still have 'lifer' friends there. We were the late 80's class and to be sure the Church committee fall out was drilled into our heads - to be sure we were MAGA patriots - before there was a MAGA. Was at an event not too long ago where DCI Petraeus was a speaker, could not believe my ears. You should have seen the glint in his eye about the Ukraine proxy war - which IMHO - so we won the cold war but lost the peace? He was 100% down with the forever wars. Total beltway suck up.

2
fac1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Former. When did you leave? Leadership of many federal institutions has changed very dramatically for the worse in the past few years.

2
tom_of_rj_fame 2 points ago +2 / -0

Under Clinton. Nothing the Clinton had done, but the Soviet Union collapsed. Not that the 'outfit' figured it out. But, for me, it was - VE day and VJ day put together - the war is over let's go home. So I took a RIFF. So yeah, I'm a dinosaur. Pre 9/11 - pre ODNI, pre- DHS. Out.

2
tom_of_rj_fame 2 points ago +2 / -0

Long ago. Government tends to chase the best people out.

2
tom_of_rj_fame 2 points ago +2 / -0

When the cold war ended - it was over for me. The Soviets were defeated - time to go home.

2
fac1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, I work for a federal agency. My workplace started pushing radical left ideology on its workforce around 2015 and it's been getting more extreme and more frequent every year since. Before then, there was no political bias at my workplace.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
talltellmanson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everything biden does is rehearsed.

Remember in the beginning he would change the reporters he would call on because he knew it was scripted to only call on specific reporters?

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember, friend. Well noted.

3
DaayTerkErJerbs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everything the Democrats do is carefully scripted bullshit. It's why they can't allow free speech because none of their narratives hold up to even miniscule amounts of prodding

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
15
stingyarthropods 15 points ago +15 / -0

pedophile in chief

4
MythArcana 4 points ago +4 / -0

🐸👌

8
Joey14 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dictator in Thief, the U.S. Resident.

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very good, Pede! English is our friend, and it's fun, too! 🐸👌

6
Hatsarehats 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dick tater.

1
eagle-eyes2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dick tatter.

2
Forty_Five 2 points ago +2 / -0

dick tater tot perhaps this demented idiot isn't the one calling the shots

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not in charge of anything. He can't even control his bowels.

98
F22-Raptor-007 98 points ago +98 / -0

And when he says bullshit like that, the left eats it up and hates us more...

60
Sigma 60 points ago +60 / -0

This is very dangerous to our democracy.exe

15
pubestache 15 points ago +15 / -0

That's the plan!

44
PhoneBandit 44 points ago +44 / -0

Wasn't this the guy who was going to be a president for all and not try to divide us?

28
NavySTG 28 points ago +28 / -0

He doesn't remember saying that....

22
saltyviewer123 22 points ago +22 / -0

Or this...

Most inclusive voter fraud organization in history...

13
Talon54 13 points ago +13 / -0

He doesn't remember what he ate for breakfast.

7
NateBedfordForrest 7 points ago +7 / -0

He doesn't remember who wiped his butt last.

3
Talon54 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like your name. He was one of the best Generals ever. His tactics and strategies are still taught worldwide. I've got several books about him and his life. He was not what most people think he was.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
MehNahMehNah 6 points ago +6 / -0

His short term memory... his memory.. is just shot.

...before he flees the podium

7
stratocaster_patriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, voted for by people driving Subarus with bumper stickers that say "Coexist".

3
shaven_llama 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have those in Alaska. They are the same people who cheer when oil companies have to fire their fellow Alaskans due to FJB’s environmental policies.

3
Pewpew4life 3 points ago +3 / -0

I seen one such Subaru on the interstate yesterday. With a Ukraine flag on it as well.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

So how's your car after running it off the road Rambo style?

2
Pewpew4life 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ha! Still on four wheels. But I pictured so mad max type shit!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, they will feed his remark - which is a hideous lie - to the C.I.A's shock troops - Antifa and BLM.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lighting via gas and styrofoam.

87
dirtymikeandthebois 87 points ago +87 / -0

It's now extreme to make your country great and preserve what makes it great... liberals are fucking retarded.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
14
TakingBackCA 14 points ago +14 / -0

The opponent is not retarded. The opponent is deadly serious in executing their moral relativist, collectivist goals—at any cost.

As our Founders said long ago:

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. -John Adams

The days of rational debate and conciliation are over; the opponent now is not as Adams saw his “opponents” hundreds of years ago—his equals, his friends; just friends that felt different about their policy prescriptions than he. They all believed in objectively moral rules, handed down by a Creator, and, critically, they all wanted the best for their friends and their country; they just had disagreements about how to get there.

No, now the opponent—consisting of moral relativist collectivists—desires nothing more than unmitigated, unhinged power. They want your body, your children, your property, your mind, and your soul. And they will destroy, rape, kill, threaten, and torture to get it. No cost is too great.

Only once we realize that this idea of “persuading” or “convincing” the supposed “retards” is well and truly dead can we move on to doing what needs to be done.

2
Patriot_FT720 2 points ago +3 / -1

Should've never sperated the church and state

2
TakingBackCA 2 points ago +3 / -1

Correct. There’s no such thing in the Constitution, and our Founders never believed in that idea. They knew, they told us clearly, that morally relativist societies are incongruent with the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

0
whatthemagaisthis 0 points ago +2 / -2

LOL literally the establishment clause in the first amendment says this. Jefferson wrote on this extensively

2
TakingBackCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Establishment Clause does not say separation of church and state. It says:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”

Your understanding of several hundred years of nuanced jurisprudence on this matter is wrong.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

US was never a theocracy, nor should it ever be. Israel never made it work either. From Moses through Solomon we see why.

Our founding fathers came out of the system whereby religious power = political power, and insured we wouldn't have that. Don't turn around and argue FOR it, neither turn it into anything else.

Individuals can still act on conscience, and NEED to. That includes elected officials, and matters of religious conscience. This is the issue and it needs to be perfectly clear. Please don't obfuscate it!

2
TakingBackCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, if I could put it in simpler terms: we aren’t supposed to be a theocracy, but our Constitution expects a moral and religious citizenry to govern. John Adam’s said as much.

2
Patriot3976 2 points ago +3 / -1

Even then that statement is taken out of context. The separate church and state meant no mandated, unified, national church (I.E. Church of England or American version of the Vatican)

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Christianity is much too divided for there to be any risk of establishing it as a State religion.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SaltyKrakenBalls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well...that is the root of conservativism....The direct opposite of what communism represents (as well as the democrat party)

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't define anything by opposing something else unless it's immovable. Maybe this is why conservatives haven't conserved anything? We need to ditch that label. MAGA works, as long as everyone agrees it can't be a cult of personality.

80
deleted 80 points ago +81 / -1
13
Icepck 13 points ago +13 / -0

To your point that not ALL extremism is bad: there are religions out there that are so set on not killing a living thing that they'll sweep the floor in front of them as they walk. They may be extremists, but you can't say that equates to a violent or dangerous movement.

1
Thelongrun 1 point ago +1 / -0

💯

8
EricCharliemella 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's what I thought immediately. They overthrew a King by killing people. That's pretty extreme, and it worked out pretty well, I'd say.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

They also told us we'd need to do that every 20 years. We're "a little" behind.

7
TakingBackCA 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Founders were truly revolutionary radicals. They believed in ideas of individual sovereignty and personal property that were unheard of. They were extremists. And thank God they were.

4
HuggableBear 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck, man, I wish MAGA were extreme.

The founders would be wading through rivers of blood by now.

62
AlphaOverBetaReturns 62 points ago +62 / -0

That's high praise 🤣

18
PaigeAshley 18 points ago +18 / -0

Indeed!

15
Erikabodereka 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yes. I'm blushing. To be even considered in the same league as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Paul Revere is such an honor.

4
DixMcCoy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who is going to write Common Sense 2.0?

4
SaltyKrakenBalls 4 points ago +4 / -0

No better time than now.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do you think we've been doing here for over 2 years?!?

4
BCIARIDC 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. News flash, it’s not an insult

3
SirBuzzKillingtonVI 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. To tyrants, I should hope we seem extreme. Let's live up to it.

3
Patriot_FT720 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's what I was thinking. We're extremely good at what we do.

58
jnic815 58 points ago +58 / -0

Weird.. we weren’t the ones burning down cities and forcing vaccinations on people but ok..

If we start playing by their rules, they don’t stand a chance…. If we were actually as violent as they say…. They probably wouldn’t exist, or at the very least they’d be afraid to say inflammatory shit like this.

14
try4gain 14 points ago +14 / -0

At some point they are going to leave us with no choice.

I think the Deep State wants a civil war.

Goals :

  • divide America
  • chaos in America
  • slow down America economy
  • make republicans look bad
6
Thelongrun 6 points ago +6 / -0

You are absolutely correct. They goad us into rising up and then put us down brutally, as a message to future generations. It worked with the English against the Irish, for a long while, until the Irish stopped playing and started butchering the bastards big time.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

BBB, butcher the bastards bigly!

0
Thelongrun 0 points ago +3 / -3

AAA +

3
defaultskin 3 points ago +3 / -0

we are already bad in the eyes of the evil. there is no peaceful way out of this, and they will eventually come to take your guns. be ready for that day.

2
try4gain 2 points ago +2 / -0

all their going to get is holes.

6
Autist_of_Kiev 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don’t forget running on a party platform of murdering babies and disfiguring and sterilizing children, causing global famines and economic collapses and endless war and illegal immigration.

29
whataboob 29 points ago +29 / -0

We’re a political organization now? ...

MAGA

5
559throw 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's just an idea

2
whataboob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice ref bro. The Penguin approves.

29
South_Florida_Guy 29 points ago +29 / -0

STFU pedophile

28
PhantomShield72 28 points ago +28 / -0

Today I learned that AntiFa and BLM are "mainstream", but love of a Constitutional Republic is "extreme".

Thanks, Joe - very cool!

21
TheSuperStableGenius 21 points ago +21 / -0

55-0, 3 justices 3 scoops, walked into north korea while you pussies looked through binoculars 5 miles away, smoked the ISIS leader like a bitch, smoked solemani like a sausage, secured our border, gave us our money back, made other countries pay their fair share into nato, made us energy independent, all in 4 years while walking with a fake ass democrat collusion election interference hoax around one leg and 2 impeachments around the other. Fuck you, get fucked.

5
joshverdugo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Get this one two coats.

17
Schiffblower 17 points ago +18 / -1

lol “in recent American history”

What a clown

3
559throw 3 points ago +3 / -0

"The most extreme organization since...:checks watch:.....nnnnnnow."

12
Cesare_Borgia 12 points ago +12 / -0

I hope so. Saving this country will take extreme measures at this point.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +3 / -2

This comment sounds like it's implying something illegal and doesn't belong on this site.

2
Donger-Lord2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Faggot.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +2 / -1

I am happy that you are free to post that here. We are broad in allowing Trump supporters free speech.

However I will continue to deport stupid stuff that could get our community shut down by the feds. If you don’t understand that concept, then grow up.

2
Donger-Lord2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re a YUGE faggot. No one cares. I’d love to know what I said was illegal? That’s right, nothing.

And even if it was, we all have a duty as American citizens to not follow unconstitutional laws. Not you though, as you are not an American citizen, just some pinko chicom faggot that will be dead in the next coming years.

1
dahdahdah_dahditdah 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’d love to know what I said was illegal?

Many readers would interpret the (now deleted) comment above as an extra-judicial (i.e. vigilante) threat against POTATUS. If it wasn't meant to be a threat against POTATUS, my suggestion is to make that abundantly clear next time, and there will be no problem. Here's a sample: "Congress needs to impeach Joe Biden, the Senate needs to convict, then he needs to legally suffer the severest Congressional penalty due to traitors under the law."

we all have a duty as American citizens to not follow unconstitutional laws

Unconstitutional laws are null and void.

2
Donger-Lord2 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no deleted comment. And why would the deepstate impeach itself?

Seems to me like a chicom faggot bot can’t even keep its story straight. Sad.

Should really learn to make a better bot, retards.

-1
dahdahdah_dahditdah -1 points ago +1 / -2

There is no deleted comment.

Really? Let's check that, shall we? At the top of this comment thread, we find the following:

deleted 12 points 10 hours ago +13 / -1

It would appear you are mistaken. The comment was presumably deleted by mods after somebody hit the deport button.

2
memechallenger33 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you have concerns, click the deport button.

10
stvgraham 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thats not actually an insult

1
dumpsterfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree, I see this as a compliment.

10
Gadsden 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hahahahahahaha!

10
Skogin 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, that historic voter fraud organization is extreme.

9
TheThreeSeashells 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't see it as an insult. I see it as desperation. When someone continually loses arguments, they run right to the name calling and hyperbole. Constantly being angry is what people with dementia do. This asshole checks both boxes every day. Usually before his morning applesauce and first diaper change.

9
mass55th 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm proud to be a MAGA extremist.

4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me too 🇺🇸

8
barwhack 8 points ago +8 / -0

Biden sniffs kids

8
LordScatmanJohn 8 points ago +8 / -0

Motherfucker your party wants to abort babies AFTER theyre born, and failing that you want to do dr mengele surgery to their junk. I could sit here all day listing the fucked up shit like that they stand for.

I dont think theres a political movement in the world as extreme as the dems.

8
SlumberBalu 8 points ago +8 / -0

Are we currently threatning AND actually burning everything to the fucking ground? OH YOUR brownshirt pussy hat antifa faggots do ? FUCK YOU PEDO BIDEN ! I KNOW WHAT MAKES YOU CHEER YOU DEGENERATE !

8
traveravis 8 points ago +8 / -0

MAGA's not an organization. It's an idea

8
CmonGubMintGibMe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do you want to make the MAGA movement bigger? Cause this is how you make the MAGA movement bigger.....

8
TommyJarvis 8 points ago +8 / -0

ALWAYS REMEMBER THE RULE OF INVERSION WHEN A LEFTIST SPEAKS

7
TheMadManDidItAgain 7 points ago +7 / -0

Extreme: "WE NEED TO MAKE SURE ELECTIONS ARE NOT FRAUDED, WE NEED ELECTION INTEGRITY!"

.

Not extreme: "A PERSON WITH A UTERUS SHOULD BE ABLE TO ABORT HER CLUMP OF CELL 6-WEEKS AFTER IT IS AN AIR-BREATHER"

7
ManBadOrange 7 points ago +7 / -0

Being America first is now considered "extreme" ? Fucking commie clowns.

3
GaryWA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's actually a mashup of Globalist Fascists and Communists. They both fundamentally believe populations are State Property. Everything is State Property including your life.

3
Meddlesom 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's been considered extreme since the 1770's.

7
Julia_J 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's a compliment.

7
FeistyCrawfish 7 points ago +7 / -0

Extreme is diddling underage kids while smoking a crack pipe constantly after successfully kicking up 10% for the Big Guy.

7
Texas_81 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because we don’t like being sold out Because we don’t want our children to be taught by radical leftists Because we believe in family not government Because we will not be controlled by media Because we want to be left alone and prosper ILL TAKE IT IM EXTREME FUCK THIS TRAITOR

7
ZeroG1515 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who burnt down cities? Where is the majority of violence? Who forced Americans to use a worthless, experimental vaccine or lose their jobs? Who calls for riots in the streets? Who created a ministry of truth? Who is starting a war with Russia? Fuck these people, don't stand down. Get ready. They are going to start another civil war.. be ready to crush them quickly and maybe defend the nation from foreign invasion thereafter

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
ExileOnRedditStreet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Project much?

7
Bball-gurl 7 points ago +7 / -0

You got that right bud

7
Russianbots 7 points ago +7 / -0

This cunt makes my blood boil......

7
Benwa1985-2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Go ahead and kick the hornets nest dumb ass. Worked out great for Virginia.

7
BigMikesSwingingCock 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sanity = extreme, according to communists.

7
BurtMcGirt 7 points ago +7 / -0

MAGA didn't own slaves, didn't incinerate shitloads of brown people in never-ending wars, and isn't infested with pedos. I know what is.

6
Lol_Garrus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Normal is viewed as "extremist" by actual extremists.

6
Kricket 6 points ago +6 / -0

He’s a confused old man and that skinsuit behind him seemed to be malfunctioning.

6
ceesco2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

These motherfuckers are going to fuck around and find out.

4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are, and they don't know it, they're THAT delusional.

1
Hunters10incher 1 point ago +2 / -1

We're gonna drive in SO many circles around dc 😤

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
Call_me_daddy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol who voted for this clown?

8
BronzeAgeMalcontent 8 points ago +8 / -0

90 million people, bigot! He's the most popular president in history.

6
immortal 6 points ago +6 / -0

fact check: true

6
TrumpLandslide20201 6 points ago +7 / -1

We are the most EXTREME threat to their illegal money laundering scheme. They have been lashing out at us ever since they put that fence up around the Capitol. TRASH BIN OF HISTORY IS IN THEIR NEAR FUTURE!

6
AdeptTrump 6 points ago +7 / -1

You made us extreme. You came after us, you placed us under a boot for two years. I don't disagree with the opposite side anymore. I straight up hate them.

5
OccasionalCortex21 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Great Unifier

5
FitOfficial 5 points ago +5 / -0

Damn right we are you disgusting traitorous pedophile.

5
SlapUp4 5 points ago +7 / -2

Shit. I wish is was...

5
Kekistan_United 5 points ago +5 / -0

its almost like the midterm elections are actually going to be a bloodbath

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're not wrong. This is what they have planned. I'll be very surprized if the Midterms actually go ahead. Which is also part of the plan.