Comments (236)
sorted by:
PapaPepe 222 points ago +223 / -1

Fucking satanists

TakingBackCA 136 points ago +136 / -0

It won’t pass, but the point is to drive the base for the midterms. It’s all coordinated and strategically planned. This is not the opponent’s first war.

The_Knight_of_sunset 67 points ago +67 / -0


I believe that this is nothing more than drumming for votes, saber-rattling, and saying "look everyone! I'm actually doing something" while doing nothing.

ModernKnight 54 points ago +54 / -0

We need to take this and run with it, pointing out their desire to slaughter viable children.

WakingKnowledge 27 points ago +27 / -0

Well in all due fairness, Satan needs tons on human sacrifices and souls. /s

deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
WakingKnowledge 9 points ago +9 / -0

you always have that one asshole. that what the /s if for.

Skabliggum2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Would that be called a slashtag?

conservativefrank 10 points ago +10 / -0

Demons want to live on this Earth. The fallen angels envy God's children. That's why Satan and the other fallen angels revolted in the first place. They want to live in the flesh, but they don't have it. They seek to possess humans.'

If they can't do that, then they want humans dead. If they can't have it, nobody can.

WakingKnowledge 2 points ago +2 / -0

never thought of it like that but makes sense. Should not God protect us from the Demons? They used to be Angles.

LadyOfLorien 4 points ago +4 / -0

He does. All of the most respected exorcist say that prayer, fasting, and regular reception of the sacramental graces are the best defenses against the demonic.

conservativefrank 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have we asked for help?

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
GEOTUSMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Legalizing post-term abortion actually works in our favor. My 🚁 is fueled and ready.

morningpancakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're missing their argument and only rallying the base. They dont care about the baby, hell some even refuse to recognize it's a baby.

talltellmanson 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yep. They had NOTHING going into midterms.

In fact, historic losses were basically guaranteed.

Now they can rally the voters, pack the courts with full Democrat voter support, and have an excuse for massive cheating despite the awful polls for midterms.

swift_water 16 points ago +16 / -0

"We had to cheat in order to protect women"

talltellmanson 6 points ago +6 / -0

It'll be more like "the stunning results despite bad polls shows that this election was a referendum on abortion"

Just like 2020 was "referendum on Trump".

All bullshit but believable enough for normies to accept the results.

SpezDispenser 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yea this may end up back firing as a rock the vote tactic.

The_Left_The 0 points ago +1 / -1

So in other words, the Democrats are doing the same thing to their base as the GOP does to us.

plznosteal 13 points ago +13 / -0

That’s what I keep saying. It’s the primer for their base, since they have literally nothing on record to run on. The Art of War.

With the state-run media backing you, not hard.

thisguy883 7 points ago +8 / -1

I wont say it wont pass because it might. Its at a 50-50 split, which means Kamala can come in as a tie breaker.

Dems own the house so it could be pushed through and signed by Potatus.

It just means it will need to be repealed by congress should the republicans take the house and senate again, which who knows. Might not happen.

We will wait and see. But none of this is a surprise to me. These fucks will fight tooth and nail for the right to kill babies.

leet23 14 points ago +14 / -0

It needs 60 votes to pass senate

coneofsilence 5 points ago +5 / -0

Filibuster, Manchin (likely wouldn't support it), and lawsuits landing it right back where it started...the Supreme Court.

RaymondBPanelli 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sinema has already confirmed she won't support ending the filibuster.

HerbertBailBondsh 4 points ago +4 / -0

But wont make a move to stop the illegal invasion.

PhantomShield72 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not to mention, they are they only ones actually engaged in this fight as though it were an actual war.

unspecified_user 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is not the opponent’s first war.

[puts greenest troops front and center, put the cavalry, veterans and reserves in the trees and behind the hill]

[opponents initial attack causes the green center to crumble and flee, opponents make chase]

[cavalry and veteran regiments pincer the ever living f out of the opponents, with the reserves picking off stragglers]

tldr: I agree that all of this abortion brouhaha is just as set-up to inspire and light a fire under the leftist base.

AtheistTrumper 18 points ago +18 / -0

Is there something worse than satanists? Because I think they are.

sorossockpuppet2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pelosi is Moloch's favorite minion

inspir3dgenius 7 points ago +7 / -0

The only good demon, is a banished demon

Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMO I'd prefer a dead one.

leonfire99 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think satanists are completely carnal, and luciferians are legitimately trying to honor the devil. So there's that if you want something worse.

unspecified_user 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wish I could believe that their ideological fervor was spurred on by their misplaced certitude that they are correct in believing what they are doing is for the "great good" and personal liberty, but all signs point to that their motivation is based in hatred and evil, whether they realize it or not.

sorossockpuppet2 4 points ago +4 / -0

These fuckers have to know they're evil as shit to some degree. But they're also brainwashed to fuck

Infidel 6 points ago +6 / -0

The left pushes for abortion because leftism is inherently satanic.

Unlike God, Satan cannot create, he can only destroy. This causes Satan to become deeply jealous of God, and as such Satan seeks to destroy all that God has created. The left likewise cannot create, it can only destroy, and seeks to tear down and annihilate everything which Western Civilization and free markets have made.

This is precisely why communists have made the destruction of the family their first cause. The ideological predecessors of Antifa (anarcho-syndicalists) were the first ones to push for mass abortion and contraception as part of plan to destroy capitalism through destroying the birthrate. Leftists hate everything beautiful and fertile.



Communism = death cult

RicFlir 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I had to guess what demons would do, this would be it.

BostonVoter 117 points ago +117 / -0

This is what motivates them. This is their priority. Not the economy. Not free and fair elections. Not the record inflation. Not the corruption with big pharma and big Tech. But killing babies is what gets them up in the morning.

spuger 66 points ago +67 / -1

hey, that's not fair.

They also want to rape them.

EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 24 points ago +25 / -1

I was going to say teach them about anal sex, but you beat me to it.

HerbertBailBondsh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Corrupt the innocent.

Zskills 1 point ago +1 / -0

Teach them about it, and then rape them. Wouldn't want to confuse the kiddos!

Walt_Kowalski 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pedos should be against abortion then.

Aquamine-Amarine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope normies see this and realize that leftists are evil, but sadly I don't have much hope. People are braindead and have short attention spans.

RumDrummer 78 points ago +78 / -0

Before long, it will be post birth abortions.

Tophat9000 71 points ago +71 / -0

It's already there in some states.

Pissed_American 21 points ago +21 / -0

But hey they keep em comfortable!

TheOutlawPepeWales 8 points ago +8 / -0

Look, we only kill live births with the mother's consent. We're not animals.

M_A_G_A_2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like Illinois?

coneofsilence 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maryland and Cali have tried to yank the ability to prosecute a mom or doctor for killing a child up to 1 year old. Didn't get very far in either chamber from what I understand.

NavySTG 40 points ago +40 / -0

I'm ok with that, so long as there is no age cutoff.

EffTheLeftDamnKunts 14 points ago +14 / -0

Underrated comment. Have my updoot.

Nomoralcompass89 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think i can get beind it if the cut off is the 250th trimester. So you have time to figure out if its going to be a productive member of society or not.

ManyDirt 24 points ago +24 / -0

Virginia went that way. Northam said the baby would be "made comfortable" while a decision is made

SteveBannonsNckbeard 17 points ago +17 / -0

One of the most chilling things ive ever heard from a pol.

2008RonPaul2012 9 points ago +9 / -0

What do you think insane push for the clotshot was?

MAGAmanforever 6 points ago +6 / -0

They keep tha baby cuhmftable in a soft southern soothing voice

TwoWords 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Lovin’ voice”

HerbertBailBondsh 1 point ago +1 / -0


TommyLasordasBallBag 50 points ago +51 / -1

Getting real sick of these fucking demons.

SlapUp4 24 points ago +28 / -4

introduced by Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal.

Christian? Nope. Muslim? Nope. Jew. Yup.

TwoWords 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just cohencidence.

HerbertBailBondsh 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh, you goys!!

Jan6Insurrectionist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Then one day...

DieHeretic 3 points ago +3 / -0

...for no reason at alll...

PepeThePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

“My spirit will rise from the grave and the world will see i was right.”

tholinz 47 points ago +48 / -1

I don’t fucking get it. You’re through the worst of the pregnancy by the third trimester. If anything becomes life threatening (and yes that can happen), it’s standard to induce labor and just get the baby out. You still have to deliver that little body if you kill it in the womb, except by the third trimester, it’s much more grisly and more dangerous for the mother. If your life circumstances have changed so fucking much you can’t keep the baby, the are literally thousands and thousands of couples who would adopt him or her in a heartbeat.

There is literally not one single advantage to aborting in the third trimester. It’s a practice that needs to be fucking BANNED.

NateBedfordForrest 33 points ago +33 / -0

For one thing, it has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the mother's health.

thisguy883 17 points ago +17 / -0

It never was.

Its rare that a mother's health will be affected during a pregnancy that killing the baby will save the mother.

So fucking rare that its difficult to find any real number on how often it happens, which is never.

Sarthax 11 points ago +11 / -0

I have a picture of the breakdown of the percentages by categories. No idea on the sources though so take with grain of salt.

Life endangerment is listed as .065% Either way you want to cut it, that's so fucking low compared to 92.330% which is listed as elective.

PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah there was a case where the baby had developed malignant tumors and they said if they hadn't already they would likely spread to the mother.

Shit like that is unfortunate but it is sensible.

Aquamine-Amarine 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, that's a very sad situation and would be an exception.

thisguy883 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ok but how often does that happen?

Its like saying I saw a video a guy getting attacked by a shark. So that means you should never enter the ocean because of the risk.

And I'd argue that you're more likely to be attacked by a shark, than the scenario you just described.

Dingdong999 0 points ago +2 / -2

That’s a ridiculous comparison. The point is, case like this should be an exception and you’d have to be incredibly insane or stupid to think otherwise. It doesn’t matter how rare it is, rare events occur and should be dealt with in a way that prevents another unnecessary death. In this case the ethical thing to do is to save the mother. Having a ban regardless of extenuating circumstances like that, is gross and amoral.

TheThreeSeashells 9 points ago +9 / -0

Which is why they ALWAYS fight against the requirement that the "abortion provider" have hospital privileges in case there is a problem. If you actually cared about the birthing unit's health, why prevent her from potential life-saving care should the need arise. There is no acceptable answer.

They tried with "There are some 'providers' that are hundreds of miles from a hospital." Nope. The answer is that if you REALLY want to kill a baby that much, you can travel for it. After all, we just saw a list of companies willing to pay for those travel expenses. Why couldn't they pay for that? Not to mention Oklahoma specifically said they duplicated Texas' abortion law because they were tired of people travelling to their state from Texas to get an abortion. So we know they were already travelling far from home to get them anyway.

ModernKnight 14 points ago +14 / -0

No advantage except the sale of the body parts, the avoiding of responsibility for the sluts, and sacrifices to Moloch. There's no advantage when looking at the world with even a vaguely moral viewpoint.

Throwingway22 8 points ago +8 / -0

If you've never read Ron Paul's reason for being anti-abortion, you should. It's only like 2 paragraphs, but it highlights the absolute depravity of the entire system.

Pepper2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are trying to apply logical thinking to irrational people

MythArcana 36 points ago +36 / -0

If you ever had any doubts about democrats being demons on earth, here is your day of reckoning.

PatriotSkorzeny 26 points ago +26 / -0

So Senate/House capable of immediate action on any issue.


ModernKnight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh, no, not any issue. Only on issues that benefit the NWO.

WinterSoldier82 21 points ago +21 / -0

Blood Sucking Vampires 🧛🏿‍♂️🧛🏿‍♀️

Miztivin 13 points ago +13 / -0

Pot belly goblins.

Skogin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hoblin’ around coming after us.

losiPig 16 points ago +16 / -0

Why abort their likely future voter base?

VoidWanderer 20 points ago +21 / -1

They proved they don't actually need a voter base. Their endpoint is agenda 2030 and depopulation.

IlhanOmarsFagBrother 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just imagine how many less gays and trannies we have today after killing 62 million infants

tholinz 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s what the grooming is for

mathteach314159 4 points ago +4 / -0

They don’t reproduce in the typical fashion. They use other tactics to pull people into their voter base that basically just fucks people up psychologically and desensitizes them to the sick ways that they preach at their woke alter.

Retard_Strength 2 points ago +2 / -0

the replacement is climbing over fences on the southern border. or just walking over the border in most places.

deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
techCEO4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you run the numbers, 1 in 3 black pregnancies end in abortion. Frightening.

ChocolateEvryday 13 points ago +14 / -1

Since when is "viability" at 6 months? I've seen stories where the baby was born at 22 weeks or around there and survived with medical intervention. Clearly they don't believe in SCIENCE, let alone God.

ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

The most premature baby to survive is Curtis Zy-Keith Means (U.S.A.) who was born to Michelle Butler on 5 July 2020 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital in Alabama, U.S.A. at a gestational age of 21 weeks 1 day or 148 days, making him 132 days premature.

ChocolateEvryday 3 points ago +3 / -0

Amazing. What a miracle. And during the pandemic too.

ForsakenForeskin 11 points ago +12 / -1

Kill all communists

vote_for_MAGA_2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

And for the liberal lurkers and mainstream media faggots reading this, we believe the democrats, elite, and most republicans are communists.

Dirk_Nager 10 points ago +10 / -0

Was anyone else taught about the Civil War the “wedge theory“

This country is splitting apart

And once again Democrats are in charge of it. Maybe after the next Civil War the Republicans will actually outlaw the party trying to destroy the nation?

thisguy883 9 points ago +10 / -1

Tim Pool made a good point the other day.

The only reason we havent entered a true civil war is because of the boomer generation. They still play both sides of the argument because they were around during most of the bullshit we are dealing with now.

As soon as they completely die out, it will be a true left vs right and no in between. Civil war will break out.

Either you're blue or red. No in between.

Dirk_Nager 2 points ago +3 / -1

Such a good point! I need to start listening to Tim again!

vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +5 / -2

Beanie Boy is a faggot.

WinnerChickenDinner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our last civil war was amongst people that weren't raised on handouts and were fairly self sufficient. This one would be led by the same sort that rushed over to Ukraine and grabbed a rifle for the first time before getting slaughtered.

mathteach314159 9 points ago +9 / -0


I am not sure at what point the baby must be delivered, but there should be no question in any normal persons head that it is wrong to abort a baby that will need to be delivered anyways. It is that simple. Our friend miscarried at 23 weeks and had to go through labor for their son that had passed away in utero.

Mental health? What is more mentally damaging to a woman.. delivering a live baby, or having a human murdered and pulled out of you limb by limb, forceps just fishing around inside of you pulling and grabbing at things?

We are wrought with evil in this world. It is the only explanation.

MAGAmanforever 12 points ago +12 / -0

Because they harvest it's organ tissue and blood for $$$. They actually prefer to deliver it still with a beating heart so when the sick fucks come to butcher it and take their pound of flesh it's fresh.

thisguy883 7 points ago +7 / -0


Its always about $$$.

PP Gets tons of $$ for this shit

PP Also donates a shit ton of money to Dems.


mathteach314159 6 points ago +6 / -0

I am fucking sick

MAGAmanforever 8 points ago +8 / -0

The baby will actually push and fight against the instruments as they harvest it from the mother, they don't use any anesthetics because they don't consider it "alive", so not only are they torturing it, they could care less what it feels while they do it, they give it as much care as a slaughterhouse would when bleeding an animal, that is probably actually more humane. The same people that perform these operations are so desensitized to it they actually have been recorded playing with the bodies mocking them while laughing.

Jan6Insurrectionist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone here still think demons aren't real?

vote_for_MAGA_2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mental health? What is more mentally damaging to a woman.. delivering a live baby, or having a human murdered and pulled out of you limb by limb, forceps just fishing around inside of you pulling and grabbing at things?

This is the biggest smoke screen of them all. Mental health is subjective based upon who the therapist is. And what mental health? The mental health of the mother after the baby is born? How can you examine or diagnose that? Answer…you can’t. Liberal therapists will just grant a mental health exception and send them on their way to the abortion clinic.

DinosaurAlert 3 points ago +3 / -0


It must be hell on fucking earth to have to walk around (or not walk around) with a corpse inside of you, waiting for the next hour, next day, next week to go into labor and be the tragedy in the maternity ward. If a doctor said "This woman is literally going crazy, we need to abort and get this over with." i'd accept that

But we're falling into the radical pro-abortion viewpoint trap. We shouldn't be debating degrees of legitimate needs for abortions, since the situation above is <0.1% of abortions.

mathteach314159 2 points ago +2 / -0

I totally agree but what I was saying was how could anyone ever think past that point is ok? Like thats the limit that should not be up for debate. Period. But yet, an all too large part of society is fighting for abortions past viability at about 22 weeks. Which is definable as nothing other than evil.

DinosaurAlert 2 points ago +2 / -0

how could anyone ever think past that point is ok?

Their point of view is that if it affects a woman's body at any point, the decision should be up to her and a doctor, full stop. If you said "What if a woman wanted to abort a healthy baby 4 hours before she went into labor?" they'd say "That would never happen."

Except it is happening. Not often, but we should err on the side of not murdering babies.

The_Knight_of_sunset 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wouldn't worry too much about this. It's likely that this is just more drumming and saber-rattling to motivate the base to get out to vote rather than any serious attempt at law-making.

Keep an eye on it if you must, but we have bigger issues to work on.

WinnerChickenDinner 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is a great red pill for anyone still watching CNN. How fast did Congress work to help taxpayers for Covid relief? Ukraine cash? Now you can measure their response time in seconds when it comes to killing babies.

Seenev 6 points ago +6 / -0

There's going to be a civil war.

Jan6Insurrectionist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not soon enough.

BasedCostanza91 6 points ago +6 / -0

Leftists are spawns of the Devil

oldhankdonald 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is why people make posters and March in the streets. Years ago, I looked away and thought they were crazy. Now- I see the importance. Liberals have no convictions that aren’t complete pathos/emotion based. Give them pathos- show them late term abortions and the lives they’ve ruined. Share the stories of the women who never recover from being tricked into them. Our brains may be more logical, but there is a legitimate emotional argument here that can and should be used.

VoidWanderer 3 points ago +4 / -1

People have tried that. The npc's laugh and say they're glad it's gone and that they'd happily step all over it. You can see for yourself as people here have posted the screenshots.

You still believe that these are people. They're not. If they were people they wouldn't be doing what they are.

oldhankdonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some are lost for good sure- but your discounting a huge majority of people who identify as “pro-Choice”. The truth is over 2/3 of PC people are against late term abortions, 50% against 20 week (pain-related laws) and 1/3 agree with heartbeat bills, 6-8 weeks.

My wife messaged and had a lengthy chat with FB friend who had posted some pro choice outrage trash. When it came down it, it was determined that she was actually against anything after 12 weeks…. So she’s actually AGAINST RvW and didn’t know it. Education is very important in this matter.

vote_for_MAGA_2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why you see the “Shout your Abortion!” campaign. This is why you see tik tok’ers getting online and boasting about the babies they’ve killed. This is why you see politicians getting on stage and bragging about how many abortions they’ve had. It’s all psychological warfare meant to trick women into thinking abortion is no big deal.

henri_derelicte 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is the problem with leftists. It isn’t good enough that abortion will still be allowed in New York and California. For them, they need this madness everywhere. It’s just like the stupid masks. It’s not good enough that they wear them. They need everyone else to go along with their paranoia

ShowMeState90 2 points ago +2 / -0

You will kill the baby. You will bake the cake. You will learn about butt sex and you will like it.

henri_derelicte 2 points ago +2 / -0

You will own nothing (not even your kids) and you will be happy /s

vote_for_MAGA_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine if conservatives forced liberals to purchase firearms?

SaltyKrakenBalls 5 points ago +5 / -0

Baby Killers going in for the KILL

KilluminatiAJ 5 points ago +5 / -0

I fucking hate democrats with a passion. This is just a way to gain voters for the democratic party for midterms.

Thywillbedone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Truly evil. Pray to end abortion.

PepeThePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Defuned Planned Parenthood needs to be on every Rep policy

LtPatterson 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol the desperation this is like impeaching Trump a 2nd time just to say they did.

Josemarti 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stephen molyneux on his podcast pointed out the USA is 1/7 nations that allow abortion after 20 weeks.

DinosaurAlert 3 points ago +4 / -1

Probably a minority opinion here:

I would support third-trimester abortions in the extremely rare cases it was originally presented for. Severe birth defects that went undiagnosed, danger to mother, etc.

The "psychological problems" presented as a reason was a situation of "She is pregnant with a baby that will certainly die before being born, and if it is born, it will suffocate to death within 2 minutes. She spends all day in bed crying because if she goes out people pat her stomach and asks when the baby is due and it is destroying her."

ALL THAT SAID, this fucking modern nonsense of "Abort a baby at 8.9 months for any or no reason, by a doctor or a guy with a claw hammer... totally legal!" is insane.

Dingdong999 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree with you. The context of a situation matters. If your at 8 months and you are healthy and the baby is healthy, just give it up for adoption. If it’s an absolutely horrible devastating situation where the baby is never going to grow up healthy and happy, why torture the mother with that? I don’t like the absolutists and the purists of either the far left or far right.

A-Man-With-Balls 2 points ago +5 / -3

I'm pro-choice unlike most of you on here but third trimester is definitely insane. Florida was most reasonable with 20 weeks. There are instances if the baby will kill the mother late term and a c-section isn't an option, this is needed. Then that makes sense and this headline is an oversimplification.

deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
Dingdong999 -1 points ago +1 / -2

If the mother is going to die by going through with the pregnancy, and you think she should be forced to do it anyways, that would be pro-death too.

skeletorcares 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know I'm against the grain here also, I support voluntary abortion up until 22 weeks similar to you. Can't agree with everyone on everything. 6 weeks ("heartbeat") is too quick some people don't even know they're pregnant at that point. But past 22 weeks when the fetus has a solid chance of surviving if the mother dies, is just too late.

vote_for_MAGA_2020 -1 points ago +1 / -2

You aren’t pro choice. You are pro death. Life begins at conception. Science has proven that.

sevans77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do we even bother to have laws against killing humans at any age? What would be the point? What about your 7 year old that made you angry so you bash his/her skull in with a baseball bat? I mean! Murder is Murder is Murder...why have laws at all for anything?!? This makes me sick to my stomach.

wethedownvoted 2 points ago +2 / -0

If SCOTUS says the federal government does not have this power, why is the federal government trying to use this power?

jollybygolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit. What they are trying to do is lay down a giant cloud of noise so that nobody talks about the stolen election and the fact that their government is 100% illegitimate.

and it's working.

Dingdong999 -1 points ago +1 / -2


ENTP 2 points ago +2 / -0

Murderous scum

bobobob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Babies have a fully developed nervous system in the third trimester and experience the full pain of being murdered.

Kekistan_United 2 points ago +2 / -0

just in time for midterms

Greasybolls 2 points ago +2 / -0

Real life isn't twitter or your protester drum circle... They are going to be crushed.

SmokeyAF 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some people laugh when we say the devil is real.

techCEO4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Third trimester is incredibly unpopular, even among Democrats. This actually makes Dems look unhinged. Not entirely bad news.

GrotthussMechanism 2 points ago +2 / -0



Steady3 2 points ago +2 / -0

The party of evil.

TrumpIsMyyPresident 2 points ago +3 / -1

This right here is why you "MAGA candidate or not going to vote" need to stfu.

"via @alizaslav: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer just announced the Senate will vote next week on a version of the Women’s Health Protection Act. The legislation has no real path forward in the current split 50-50 chamber."

At least RINOs won't immediately jump to vote on killing innocent babies.

thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

RINOS dont get money from planned parenthood. So they dont care either way and it makes them look good in front of their base.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
ChazzleDazzle 1 point ago +1 / -0


Goatboy66 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they dont it will be harder to get their Daily feed Of baby body parts.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Monz 1 point ago +1 / -0

from a week of this leaking and they are already trying to push a legislative solution. As much as I hate them I wish our own elected officials had that kind of fervor.

It's crazy how important it is for them to kill babies on demand for them.

Fresnor 1 point ago +1 / -0

The party of baby murder

drmrboy 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're gonna run outta white people if this goes down. 🤓

STIDGIT64 1 point ago +1 / -0

No please make it leagal to abort any Democrat, leftist, antifa member, blm member and FAMILIES UP TO 82 YEARS OLD they want to abort babies due to the fact they are an iconvience so as these pricks get to be a bigger inconvience as they get older for instance Biden, pelosi !Schumer and others likes of Obama and various other monkees.

sorossockpuppet2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This regime shouldn't even have taken power, and should have been ousted after the middle east pull out, nevertheless fucking Russia shit

South_Florida_Guy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're just not going to stop trying to murder babies

PeruvianNeckTie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Proper garden tools mad.