2234
Comments (1397)
sorted by:
849
Usernameno1 849 points ago +880 / -31

Still voting Barnette.

656
IncredibleMrE1 656 points ago +669 / -13

If GEOTUS has concerns about things in her past, maybe he should have actually vetted her instead of just endorsing the tranny loving, abortion promoting, gun grabbing, mask nazi WEF shill Dr. Oz.

Ric Grenell completely lost his mind yesterday attacking her over stuff that is either demonstrably false or extremely based.

266
deleted 266 points ago +275 / -9
318
AnacronicA 318 points ago +324 / -6

The simple fact that the Left are up in arms against her while Oz is getting little attention tells me that, regardless of the flaws which she may very well have, she is definitely the far superior choice.

233
deleted 233 points ago +239 / -6
113
Thelongrun 113 points ago +118 / -5

You got it right. Same here.

-73
MaltipooSaysWoof -73 points ago +43 / -116

Oz is the ONLY candidate who said "we cannot move on from the 2020 theft".

The others like Barnette do not mention the theft in 2020 at all to please their DNC masters. Barnette wanted a statue of Obummer during the Fentanyl Floyd riots.

131
TheOne1 131 points ago +134 / -3

Watch the debates, she mentioned the steal multiple times.

71
theflabmaster 71 points ago +75 / -4

Barnette wanted a statue of Obummer during the Fentanyl Floyd riots.

Source?

Edit: I see the source now, yes she wanted Fredrick Douglas and Obama statues added to the Lincoln Emancipation statue so the far left wouldn't tear it down, it would show progress of how far we've come as a society. So we should hate her now for trying to preserve our history and bring people together when racial tensions were high?

60
Iranhasnukes 60 points ago +63 / -3

Ahh, she’s all in on the theft of 2020. Have you even listened to a word she has said?

23
Thelongrun 23 points ago +26 / -3

I've seen a video of the man saying he would have certified the 2020 'Election Results'.

17
KekAndSodomy 17 points ago +17 / -0

When you talk out of your ass, you have shit taste

20
paradox123 20 points ago +20 / -0

Be careful with that thought.

In 1913 the banks were protesting the Federal Reserve Act. It was all designed to decieve them.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
TrumpsWallet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Samsies

8
Throwingway22 8 points ago +8 / -0

The left and all the worst RINOs.

6
beaustovall 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is because she is a Christian.

If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.

John 15:19

-18
Here4thememology -18 points ago +20 / -38

Illusion. They lead you to punch a strawman. Again , Trump is showing that hes not extreme, he is building a brand and trying to win moderates to our side who will eventually become more conservative as time goes on

88
zeller 88 points ago +96 / -8

will the blind support of every trump endorsement ever fucking stop?

people need to start trusting their own eyes and ears.

newsflash: trump makes shitty picks at times. he's human.

29
BidenLikesMiners 29 points ago +33 / -4

THis. geotus may have STARTED MAGA, but its our responsibilities to make sure the REAL MAGA candidates are the ones winning.

Sometimes geotus will listen to too much swamp talk, and us voting in unison can snap his opinions back to true MAGA. DJT is one of the best politicians we've got, but still needs our advice on who is really maga.

14
Foomer 14 points ago +19 / -5

But but but that goes against the "trust the plan" and the Q 4D chess master narrative mindset.

5
ProphetOfKek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah most on GAW hate Oz.

0
Wexit-Delecto 0 points ago +9 / -9

It does? Here are some Q quotes for you:

Think for yourself (posted 27 times)

Trust yourself (posted 16 times, plus another 3 in all caps)

Trust and believe in yourself (2 times)

Think for yourself (18 times)

And so on.

Perhaps you could name the Q post in which he told us to blindly trust everything President Trump says?

If you can't name that post, then why would you say shit like the above?

3
True_Curmudgeon 3 points ago +7 / -4

He makes and has made shitty picks the vast majority of times

1
TheOne1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Trust Sessions...

1
Qwikphaze 1 point ago +8 / -7

It’s not that he’s human, he’s clearly making a decision not because it’s the right decision, but because it’s easy. That’s lazy and alarming.

2
Jackno8d 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean he does have internal polling we don't know about. He could really be looking at numbers that he trusts that say Barnette will NEVER win. I'm not going to call him stupid or lazy, he does things very specifically.

1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

In fact it's one of the most consistent things he has done.

The guy was a great president, and I'm sure there are plenty of excuses for some of his bad judgements but he still has been making bad pick after bad pick.

33
Snoman 33 points ago +35 / -2

Moderates that become conservative, are you paying attention at all ?

5
Wagingliberty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Moderates aren't becoming conservative they are siding with conservatives so long as conservatives remain the reasonable choice.

6
BoltBoltBoltBolt90 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump won on a largely conservative platform in 2016, calling for an America First agenda. We don't need "moderate" votes to win.

2
Here4thememology 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats what you think. I am not a moderate . Im realistic. The reason our country is going down the toilet is because Conservatives are too moderate . When I say moderate , I mean they are moderate they are fence sitting wimps. the lefties have moved so far left that it has made the moderate look red ... tell me ??? how many conservatives will let the lefties roll tanks into the streets with a communist army ? I say 80-90 percent of them theyre weak conservatives they wouldnt know what to do if the GOP doesnt spoon feed them

6
pray4peace4 6 points ago +7 / -1

Like Romney?

3
MehNahMehNah 3 points ago +5 / -2

In this case his analysis may be wise.

He doesn't hate Barnett, he just wants to deprive the Dems a 'victory.'

Sometimes you work with what you got.

-54
MaltipooSaysWoof -54 points ago +13 / -67

how is she far superior, cuck? she wanted a statue of OBUMMER during the fentanyl floyd riots.

28
AlpineSeaHolly 28 points ago +32 / -4

Receipts are needed to make progress in this discussion.

53
AlpineSeaHolly 53 points ago +55 / -2

I read the entire petition. She is against the removal of confederate monuments. Yes she recommends an Obummer statue to help Blacks focus on their progress. Instead of focusing on removing confederacy statues and monuments.

29
GreatWhiteBuffalo 29 points ago +31 / -2

she is also a ...... black woman. Which makes sense to want to see prominent black people highlighted. Typical non-issue. Even our side is doing it to our side now...

13
neurojerk 13 points ago +14 / -1

That's obviously what she was getting at. She's trying to throw them a bone to get them to calm the fuck down and see that progress has been made, and preserve the confederate monuments at the same time. She's clearly not doing it because she loves Obama or is a secret Democrat or something. Agree or disagree with the strategy, but I think that was clearly her intent.

1
3dandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pay attention, Google doesn't censor the searches for these results so you need to find them for yourself stop asking for sources you lazy stupid incompetent unskilled trolls.

-1
Thelongrun -1 points ago +12 / -13

And the receipts are never forthcoming, funnily enough.

0
3dandy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Aww stupid baby doesn't like being told to pay attention. Try using Google next time it's not going to censor Obama statue results.

-1
3dandy -1 points ago +1 / -2

I seen the many times sources was posted hours before you left this comment.

Just because there's inflation doesn't mean you can't afford to pay attention.

-21
MaltipooSaysWoof -21 points ago +8 / -29

https://www.change.org/p/national-park-service-the-emancipation-memorial-statue-moving-forward

Here you go. Change.Org petition by Barnette to create a statue of Obummer.

-21
MaltipooSaysWoof -21 points ago +11 / -32

https://www.change.org/p/national-park-service-the-emancipation-memorial-statue-moving-forward

Here you go. Change.Org petition by Barnette to create a statue of Obummer.

27
IowanMaga 27 points ago +28 / -1

As an earlier comment pointed out, she wanted that and Frederick douglass statues up near the Lincoln Memorial to show black progress.

There is more to her decision than just a statue of Obama

21
Double-Y_Chromo 21 points ago +25 / -4

Lmao You're such s cultist faggot, Anaconda. GTF off my planet, neocon fuck.

-37
MaltipooSaysWoof -37 points ago +10 / -47

So you want an obama statue faggot? Trump endorsed OZ. We support TRUMP ENDORSEMENTS here. Rule 1.

First thing Barnette will do as a Senator (if she doesn't get demolished in the election before) is cosponsor a bill making an "Obama Memorial"...mark my fucking words.

13
Tendiesandkekchup 13 points ago +15 / -2

Trust sessions.

6
Porkbut 6 points ago +7 / -1

Suicide and no longer dealing with us "faggots" is only 50c with the right bullet, maybe consider that instead of whatever it is you think your accomplishing and wasting far more time and sense

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Kottonballs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blind following? Sounds like typical grabbler talk to me.

65
Mothertrumprr 65 points ago +65 / -0

Mrs Lindsay Graham came out for Oz. That's all you need to know.

20
Neophilus 20 points ago +20 / -0

Like out of the closet?

20
Mothertrumprr 20 points ago +20 / -0

Both in support and gayness lol

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
-77
K-Harbour -77 points ago +28 / -105

No. The MAGA King has spoken. The math backs him up, 110%.

18
BidenLikesMiners 18 points ago +18 / -0

Geotus is not king. he is the 1st leader of MAGA. Ultimately, it will be us all who decide WHO the REAL MAGA is.

-4
GBA4ever -4 points ago +1 / -5

I agree. Greg Kelly had more on barnette on his show tonight. If you don’t think Trump knows what he’s doing endorsing Oz and offering no background on Barnette like Kelly did tonight, you might be a shill that wants a D senator in Pennsylvania.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
GBA4ever 0 points ago +2 / -2

He’s a famous rich guy like Trump who doesn’t need the grief of politics. Lots of stuff in the public domain to be exploited. No one knows what was agreed to between Trump and Oz. Barnette will not win the general election unless 51% of Pennsylvania voters are on this site. Seems like a political psyop. She’s under the radar with some suspect stuff in her background. If she was MAGA Trump would have endorsed her.

-6
MaltipooSaysWoof -6 points ago +48 / -54

lmao kathy barnette wanted a statue of barry obongo. that is not conservative. that alone, along with other things will lead to her getting absolutely curbstomped in november.

kathy already lost a congressional seat she ran in earlier to the democrat 60-40%. she will be annihilated by the communist fetterman in a statewide general.

pa is a purple/RINO state - they love RINOs like toomey and santorum.

looks like cucks here want a repeat of doug jones in alabama in 2017. trump told everyone to vote for luther strange (establishment) in that primary, but people like these barnette simps thought they were smarter than trump and voted for that faggot roy moore who got curbstomped by the democrat in ALABAMA.

as always - TRUST TRUMP!!! oz has name recognition and can appeal to normie boomers. he is also trump endorsed and trump has guaranteed he will be MAGA.

SPEZ - to all the barnette simps: here is the change.org petition barnette created to make a statue of obummer. she is a leftist who will choke harder than romney in 2012 if allowed to win the nomination.

49
ab1ab1 49 points ago +53 / -4

"kathy already lost a congressional seat she ran in earlier to the democrat 60-40%."

Are you really that stupid that you believe one heavily Democrat-gerrymandered district is representative of the state of PA as a whole?

And if you ARE that stupid, can you explain how and why Barnette (40%) DID BETTER IN THAT DISTRICT than Lord Trump did (37%)?

-2
Axiom502 -2 points ago +9 / -11

Joggers

-28
MaltipooSaysWoof -28 points ago +11 / -39

then why did she run in that 'democrat gerrymandered district' anyways instead of a redder/winnable one?

that alone shows she has shit political acumen and/or is a 'maga inc' grifter like kim klacic and all of those others who ran in D+80 districts like maxine waters' LA district and downtown baltimore in 2020, just to grift for national donations even though they knew their campaigns were DOA, and they only did like 2-3% better than the average republican.

how would this apply statewide? because she will spend all her time campaigning in philly/pittsburgh which votes 70-80% dem, not campaign at all in the rural red areas which is where republicans actually need massive turnout to offset philly/pitt (and offset THE CHEATING) and win elections. only to improve by like 3% in the cities, while bleeding support in the rurals, and losing the state. she'll go along with the 'black philly voters are actually conservative and just need to be convinced' bullshit and not campaign where she needs to.

the obama statue, running in an unwinnable D+20 district by doing the same grift as klacic and others to mop up donations and go home, along with other things shows she has no political acumen and will get curbstomped by fetterman in nov.

that kind of shit political instinct is EXACTLY why trump will not endorse her.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
Oz_watch 2 points ago +3 / -1

then why did she run in that 'democrat gerrymandered district' anyways instead of a redder/winnable one? because that where she lives you stupid fuck

1
Tombstone2W 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not everyone can afford to move into new districts like establishment politicians and carpetbaggers.

33
Treefreak1776 33 points ago +35 / -2

Dr Oz would no doubt support a statue of obummer just saying. Hell he would probably insist it be made of solid gold.

8
FiDollaMilkshake 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep. He LOVES Big Mike... had him on his show + fawned incessantly... Never Oz.

7
Thelongrun 7 points ago +11 / -4

🎯

32
Colonel_Chestbridge 32 points ago +33 / -1

No opinions on Barnett, but I’d rather lose to the most insane democrat imaginable than let another RINO into office.

21
DaayTerkErJerbs 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is the way. Just look at that 40 billion ukraine aid package. Most Rs in congress are garbage. Most hide it better than the Romneys. They usually only expose as many as required to move an agenda forward that day.

15
HikingPatriot 15 points ago +15 / -0

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

― Taylor Caldwell, A Pillar of Iron

5
HeavyMetalPatriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

Traitors get the rope first.

0
Ronpaulblican2 0 points ago +3 / -3

No thanks. I hear you but in reality, nope. I hate neocons but Democrats want to destroy our lives.

11
Colonel_Chestbridge 11 points ago +11 / -0

So do RINOs. They just want your children to deal with the consequences rather than you.

7
Wagingliberty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Neocons are democrats. Get that through your tribalist skull

23
SilverBackTrump 23 points ago +24 / -1

Do you really think people in PA - WHICH WENT OBAMA BIGLY - are going to hold that against Barnette when the alternative is a psychotic democrat commie?

Seriously this is the dumbest, head in ass post I have ever seen on this site, and your level of absolute cluelessness as to how most retards still see Obama is really just next level.

6
Wagingliberty 6 points ago +6 / -0

Barnettes statue proposal will cost her a few brainlet votes but she is still quite palatable to the masses. That is what we want, palatable right wingers that can win.

2
SilverBackTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly!

3
Tendies_or_GTFO 3 points ago +5 / -2

I think what he's saying is that even if she could win, there's no more of an assurance that she actually be MAGA than Oz will, given that they're both questionable. That's a reasonable take. I'm still leaning toward Barnette, but the truth is, Fetterman is more than just a Democrat, like Hillary was/is. Most of the time, the lesser of two evils argument is silly, but it in some cases (and sadly often in PA in general), it's the only way.

6
SilverBackTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think that is a fair take for sure. I lived in PA years ago and actually worked a little on campaigning for Pat Toomey back in the day when he was trying to unseat Arlen Specter. Then he became Arlen Specter. Then he became worse.

PA definitely has issues with Senators and has for years. Then there is the whole elected PA Supreme Court.... but that's for another day.

1
Imransgarage 1 point ago +2 / -1

Frustrating there still aren’t better candidates.

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +5 / -3

Well put.

20
AlpineSeaHolly 20 points ago +20 / -0

full disclosure I hate Obama but I don't mind if there is a statue of him like many other presidents. I read her petition and there is nothing far left about it. She is against removing monuments and wants Obamar statue to remind blacks that their conditions continue to get better. To focus on the positive.

1
BidenLikesMiners 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obama was a president. even as a shit one, it shouldnt be controversial to have a statue of a past president, if the dems want a solid gold statue of obama paid for by obamacare libs, i could care less.

We should have statues of all our presidents. But that does mean shitlibs shouldnt be hating on when we make one for geotus.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
11
Kinkinnatus 11 points ago +11 / -0

His regime is part of our history, and people should be reminded of it for a long time.

8
minttea2 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think Kathy more or less agrees with you (circa 2015): https://nitter.net/Kathy4Truth/status/653789875112681473

Amen! Obama is horrible...on all measures. He loves all things homosexual (Mmmmmm), he supports all things Muslim... http://fb.me/7xgiKv7cy

4
Zoggurat 4 points ago +6 / -2

HIV positive

2
Wagingliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing positive about any president since Coolidge with the exception of Trump.

73
maga_mama_757 73 points ago +74 / -1

Grenell has become unhinged over Barnette. It is truly bizarre.

25
lordvon 25 points ago +35 / -10

never trust fags i always say. u/NancyPeloci where u at?

11
BasedInvestor 11 points ago +18 / -7

He was a great DNI, and he’s speaking on behalf of Trump.

About half of gay men supported Trump and we don’t need to alienate them just because we are sick of what the LGBT movement has become.

I would find it very hard to vote for Oz but I would not hold it against any PA patriot. I’m in Texas so not my choice

7
Wagingliberty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lgbt is to homos what blm is to blacks and the klan is to whites. Collectivism is for faggots and collective judgement is for scumfucks

1
BasedInvestor 1 point ago +4 / -3

I’ll add I’ve been supporting Barnette this whole time. But I’m not going to demonize Grennel for what he is doing on behalf of Trump

-16
docdarling -16 points ago +3 / -19

NancyPeloci has shown maturity and ability to grasp reason, sanity and compromise.

Calling him (or her) names doesn't really give an image. Also +1 for what basedinvestor said down below.

You make peace with enemies, not friends.

4
lordvon 4 points ago +6 / -2

i didnt call him/her/xim/xer anything. how about grasping reading comprehension first, before 'ability to grasp reason, sanity, and compromise'?

-3
docdarling -3 points ago +2 / -5

Well, english is not my main, but "where my fags at" still sound like an insult to me.

3
lordvon 3 points ago +7 / -4

oh thats why you sound like a retarded, cheese-hole-brain libtard. anyways your quotes are not what i said.

1
realPierreDelecto 1 point ago +2 / -1

Grenell is staying loyal to Trump and that is the most important thing in my opinion.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +3 / -2

Anyone that makes the establishment go unhinged is the right person for the job

15
ottawapolice 15 points ago +70 / -55

Grenell is an open homosexual. You cannot be on the right and also be a homosexual. We are traditionalists. We are anti-degeneracy.

19
EagleI 19 points ago +35 / -16

Also disagree. I'm not an authoritarian, so you can do whatever you want in the bedroom, even if I think it's weird.

38
ottawapolice 38 points ago +45 / -7

They have a month, they have a flag, they are in the schools turning the children, they are on tv, they are on the radio, they are everywhere. Far from just the bedroom.

30
BasedInvestor 30 points ago +32 / -2

We can get rid of pride month indoctrinating children without criminalizing homosexuality.

10
80960KA 10 points ago +22 / -12

We can also keep them out of positions of power without criminalizing man on man anal sex and fisting.

10
BasedInvestor 10 points ago +13 / -3

Keep the bad ones out of positions that they will abuse to push a gay agenda - like these trans teachers all you want.

But Grennel was an excellent DNI, and every person should want to emulate his professionalism in that role.

I didn’t even know he was gay for a year or so after he got that job - and exposed a lot of gov corruption.

4
trumptasticly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah especially that group that voted for the federal reserve, the income tax, the direct election of senators, civil rights, women's suffrage, crony protectionism of copyright and trademark laws. That group sucks but keeping gays out probably will fix all the damage the first group did.

3
akai_ferret 3 points ago +8 / -5

Dudes like Dave Rubin have done a thousand times more to bring people to conservatism in a few years than you will in your entire life.

So I don't give a damn who he has sex with.

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +5 / -3

Ah yes, just restrict their rights. Perfect.

2
ottawapolice 2 points ago +11 / -9

They should be shamed publicly. It has no place in a civilized society. They can keep it to themselves as it used to be.

2
cmndr_pepe_spacefrce 2 points ago +7 / -5

you are not part of civilized society saying authoritarian shit like that

2
Wagingliberty 2 points ago +3 / -1

Theocrats have no business calling anyone uncivilized. You fuckers are no different than the taliban. Right down to the beards and illiteracy.

6
Ronpaulblican2 6 points ago +8 / -2

They = ALL OF THEM? No.

That’s how leftists think. Based gay Republicans deserve our respect. That starts with not limping them in with the lunatic rainbow mafia. Or should we start demanding that straight white people be lumped in with the leftists suburban wine moms that vote for late term abortion and socialism?

I didn’t think so.

-4
ottawapolice -4 points ago +3 / -7

Fuck you and fuck faggots.

4
Ronpaulblican2 4 points ago +5 / -1

The most anti-gay usually turn out to be the most gay among us.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
1
EagleI 1 point ago +3 / -2

Thats different. Thats a tax payer funded library, and that is now impacting non consenting minors.

7
trump1aj 7 points ago +7 / -0

I dont care what anyone does in their bed room but if I find out about it they will not be invited to my house. Some day this political party will see it the same way.

5
gamephreak5 5 points ago +8 / -3

Hmmm...even beastiality? Incest? Or pedophilia? It's all ok in the bedroom as long as you dont know about it, right?

Screw you, degenerate faggot! Either it's all ok or none of it is!

AND NONE. OF. IT. IS.

5
EagleI 5 points ago +6 / -1

You're missing a key component. Consenting adults. Animals can't consent. Children can't consent.

4
Tombstone2W 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're a libertarian on that issue, not conservative.

5
EagleI 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm a MAGA voter. I prefer limited government and that includes social issues. I think very few things improve when the federal government gets involved. For instance, gay marriage wouldn't have been a national issue if the government hadn't already wormed their way into traditional marriage. The issue would have been decided by churches.

3
Tombstone2W 3 points ago +3 / -0

Government with the power to grant rights has the power to take them away. That's why ours was meant to recognize God given rights and protect them.

I've turned more authoritarian as I've gotten older. I don't want to see degenerates or have them near my kids. I don't want to be forced to accommodate their degeneracy. I would prefer to put them back in the closet. But I recognize that power WILL be used against me, so I prefer local solutions and will never belong to a church or organization that condones such sickness.

2
Wagingliberty 2 points ago +3 / -1

Conservatives are chickenshit cowards. You are the dregs of the right. MAGA is right wing but it's not conservative.

1
Tombstone2W 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cool story bro.

6
bubadmt 6 points ago +18 / -12

Agreed. Homosexuals can never be truly 100% aligned with MAGA for obvious reasons. They can be based maybe, but they will never perfectly mesh together.

11
1woodland 11 points ago +11 / -0

Unfortunately, it seems “Based” nowadays just means holds baseline common sense beliefs regarding economics and immigration

5
bubadmt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, based is now a literal interpretation. Base-d.

2
BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +3 / -1

You cannot be on the right and be gay

WRONG. I dont care who you fuck in your relationship, but keep it out of the degenerative parades

NEXT

2
LordS0rbital 2 points ago +10 / -8

Thank you sir. Fags who claim conservative will always have a hidden agenda. Always.

7
Colonel_Chestbridge 7 points ago +7 / -0

What’s Scott Preslers hidden agenda?

7
Tombstone2W 7 points ago +11 / -4

Trick question: it's hidden. But being pro homosexuality is not conservative, it's a libertarian position. The two may intersect frequently, but they are distinct on issues like this.

1
almond_activator 1 point ago +2 / -1

In a nation of moral men and women, libertarianism is the correct philosophy.

Once, we had that nation, but no longer. It will be many generations before we can fully trust people to make the correct decisions with no guidance.

From my perspective today, in these once-United States, libertarian is the moral stance, conservatism the pragmatic one.

1
Tombstone2W 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're absolutely correct. They've turned us into an economic zone. I used to be a libertarian, and I once supported gay right to get married. But I started to see the breakdown of society and family and realized we have to fight to reclaim the birthright given to us by our forefathers.

0
Colonel_Chestbridge 0 points ago +4 / -4

Says who? Are you the conservative gatekeeper?

4
Tombstone2W 4 points ago +5 / -1

If it keeps faggots like you out, yes.

2
LordS0rbital 2 points ago +4 / -2

Maybe that you suck him off? Never heard of him and never will.

1
Colonel_Chestbridge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, so creative.

Not surprised you haven’t heard of people who actually get off their ass and do something meaningful with their lives.

1
LordS0rbital 1 point ago +1 / -0

I worry about issues in my own backyard. Don't live in PA. It was a comment not a fact, asshole. Keep simping.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ottawapolice 1 point ago +10 / -9

If anyone supports homos they are subverters. What a fucking joke if you think you are somehow conservative while promoting gay sex.

0
BidenLikesMiners 0 points ago +1 / -1

conservative promoting gay sex

Whos promoting it? youve made tons of gay comments in this thread.

-1
ottawapolice -1 points ago +1 / -2

ofcourse anaconda would be promoting homos and trannies

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
2
ottawapolice 2 points ago +6 / -4

Nature actually does not make people gay. Nature in itself is anti-gay as they cannot pro-create. Homosexuality is first and foremost a mental illness and continues through creation of man. They breed through pedophilia and molestation of children. Finally, I said they should not be open homosexuals. It should not be in the public eye at all.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
julianleroux 14 points ago +14 / -0

The Federal Reserve CANNOT fix what the Federal Reserve broke. Period. I’m the only candidate calling it out & that’s why the long knives are out for this campaign.

https://twitter.com/Kathy4Truth/status/1524800691222593536

From this alone I can be confident that she's the superior candidate.

8
americandrunk 8 points ago +13 / -5

Bingo. Good to see we all are learning about President Trumps weaknesses. It tells us what we will get in 2024.

81
Spicemustfiow 81 points ago +84 / -3

I think it’s almost clearly some sort of horse trading thing.

You give x candidate this much and I’ll give you Dr Oz.

It’s just stupid. Especially today to post this right when she is gaining momentum.

63
Thelongrun 63 points ago +69 / -6

That's precisely why it was posted today, to stop her momentum. He is sabotaging her.

'She has many things in her past which have not been properly explained'....

"It just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans. Now, it shouldn't be that way. But if you go back, I mean it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats....But certainly we had some very good economies under Democrats, as well as Republicans. But we've had some pretty bad disasters under the Republicans."

DONALD TRUMP

Trump was a registered Democrat from August 2001 through September 2009. https://www.thoughtco.com/was-donald-trump-a-democrat-3367571

18
Bullet3250 18 points ago +18 / -0

The point Trump is making is 'the November Election' ....

That is something we all need more information on... what is needed for her to be Vetted fully?

19
powershellder 19 points ago +21 / -2

Perhaps she is just adopting the MAGA platform because it’s popular?

I was really rooting for Burgess Owens last election cycle, and he was one of the people who voted for $40 billion for Ukraine.

I don’t live in her state, so i can’t vote either way, but perhaps she is lying?

Just speculating here.

41
Joaniev9 41 points ago +41 / -0

She's got maga tweets from 2015 and 16. Oz has hours of his daytime, Oprah funded show that proves he is NOT maga.

12
EvJohn 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm pretty pissed at Owens for that reason. Was disappointed that he cucked out.

9
FreddyThePatriot 9 points ago +11 / -2

How is this different than Oz who will know for absolute certainty is not MAGA

3
powershellder 3 points ago +5 / -2

Perhaps he made a deal with Oz?

I honestly don’t know. I’m just speculating.

I think people should vote for whoever they like best in the primary, then support the primary winner in the general. I wish voting wasn’t rigged.

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know what to believe but like you, I'm out of state and can't vote for her. She certainly could be a lefty cloaked in MAGA but PA pedes will have to research her background themselves.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
Thelongrun 16 points ago +19 / -3

'what is needed for her to be Vetted fully?'

Good question.

And the same strict vetting should have been applied to the W.E.F sponsored, dual citizen Turkish-American Democrat-admiring Mehmet Oz.

I'm all for a level playing field, but this is not what we have here.

11
IncredibleMrE1 11 points ago +12 / -1

This right here.

5
BidenLikesMiners 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm kinda worried about geotuses judgement if hes doubling down on OZ right now.

some commentary on his contradictions before he was running https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/12/07/dr-ozs-2a-views-at-odds-with-pa-gun-owners-n53085

2
Husky 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was never the same since that meet you there speech.

He's been lukewarm ever since.

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
6
BahamaDon 6 points ago +7 / -1

WEF membership immediately rules them out for me. They are globalist pigs that want us to go to slaughter.

1
Thelongrun 1 point ago +4 / -3

100%. He's a W.E.F Global Leader. They are eugenicist Nazis and are involved in the current Depopulation Event and he is one of them.

They want us dead.

5
Bullet3250 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agree 100%.

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +6 / -3

I'm getting a bad taste in my mouth about all of this shit.

Anyway, it's all ridiculous. Re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic stuff.

Dominion and fake mail-in ballots will decide the outcome.

And, yes, I'll still be voting, nonetheless.

7
Bullet3250 7 points ago +7 / -0

If WE don't vote....

THEY will not have to cheat.

5
Treefreak1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

What do both of these candidates say about the 2020 election steal?

9
Bullet3250 9 points ago +9 / -0

OZ is 'lightly' challenging the NOV 2020 FRAUD. Dr. Oz: ‘We cannot move on’ from the 2020 election he stated in a debate.

Kathy is of course on fire over the issue.

A CRITICAL ISSUE BECAUSE PHILLY IS THE NATION'S HEADQUARTERS OF THE TRAFFICKED BALLOT...

and while it may cause problems in 2022... in will be a HUGE PROBLEM AGAIN IN 2024 - unless they just END MAIL IN BALLOTING ENTIRELY.

0
GBA4ever 0 points ago +2 / -2

Listening to her quotes Greg Kelly has shown the past few days, I’d say at best she lacks sound political instincts. At worst a fake opportunist. Oz like Trump is a rich and famous guy who doesn’t need the grief of politics. I would support him because President Trump does. He has more insight into it then anyone looking in from the outside.

-2
MaltipooSaysWoof -2 points ago +16 / -18

kathy barnette wanted a statue of barry obongo. anybody that wants that is a leftist plant.

funny how all of a sudden out of nowhere, shills started simping for barnette overnight. wasn't organic. almost like they're being paid to shill this no name/leftist who already got curbstomped 60-40 in another election she ran in, to turn this into a roy moore v. doug jones 2.0, and not only defeat trump endorsed oz, but get radical communist fetterman in there (he is a self avowed communist).

19
Bullet3250 19 points ago +19 / -0

And no one is paid to shill for OZ...

-_-

3
rubmewithbeer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you have sauce on that?

-11
MaltipooSaysWoof -11 points ago +7 / -18

here is the change.org petition barnette created to make a statue of obummer. she is a leftist who will choke harder than romney in 2012 if allowed to win the nomination.

5
BidenLikesMiners 5 points ago +5 / -0

That was Kathys opinion on 'tearing down' statues. it was to prevent the destroying of more history.

In 1876, in honor of President Abraham Lincoln and the over 700,000 men who died in the Civil War, a statue portraying the late President and a former slave was created and dedicated in Lincoln Park in Washington, D.C. It is known as the Emancipation Memorial Statue and was funded by former slaves to honor Lincoln.

Today, this statue has become a point of contention as the former slave is portrayed crouching (or rising, depending on who you ask) at Lincoln’s feet. There is an effort to remove it because many people feel that it depicts the freed slave in a perpetual subservient position.

This is a concern that should be addressed, however, tearing down what represents our past is not the answer for our nation's future. Instead, the best way to heal our nation is to continue to tell its story. This is why we're proposing new markers and monuments that display America's evolution as it continues down that path of becoming a more perfect union.

4
BahamaDon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Obama couldn't hold Frederick Douglas' jock strap. But he could hold Michelle's.

0
rubmewithbeer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thanks for that, what an idiot

5
BahamaDon 5 points ago +5 / -0

It might have the Streisand effect. He brings her up, people didn;t pay attention to her before, then he mentions here and everyone starts paying attention,. Perhaps she'll win.

1
Thelongrun 1 point ago +4 / -3

That's a very solid point, and I think you may very well be right. Let's hope so 😃

-1
Thelongrun -1 points ago +3 / -4

Great user name, btw. 🏖

2
deleted 2 points ago +7 / -5
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
7
The_Litehaus_Abides 7 points ago +11 / -4

Doesn't he realize that Oz won't win the general either? The only way Oz wins is if the fix is in. Republicans steal elections too, after all.

Also, if his endorsements really carry that much weight then endorsing Barnett would have assured her the win. Her poll numbers already look good.

So yes, there's something very wrong with Trump, we've all noticed it and I don't see the problem getting any better. There's no coming back from whatever it was they did to him on Jan. 6.

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +8 / -5

Such a very good comment - I totally agree with every word. The Deep State captured him on the 6th, and it hasn't let go. To cut a long, horrible story short.

6
The_Litehaus_Abides 6 points ago +9 / -3

The downvotes against our commonsense comments are ridiculous, too. It appears there's also something very wrong with Patriots.win. Holy shit.

29
TAIWANNUMBERONE 29 points ago +32 / -3

It's Jared Kushner pushing more dual citizen sandpeople to destabilize the US for his middle eastern masters.

7
Thelongrun 7 points ago +11 / -4

💯

1
QuickHands 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its about the US Air Force bases in Turkey, they want their guy Oz installed or they remove the bases. They are critical to the war machine and having a presence next to Russia, if we lose them the war hawks will go apoplectic

They clearly must have communicated this to Trump and his team

-42
deleted -42 points ago +6 / -48
18
Foletado 18 points ago +18 / -0

she has no following

She has the same following as Oz in this poll.

https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2RQlbY/poll-pa-gop-usa-senate--oz-versu/c/

-31
deleted -31 points ago +2 / -33
11
Treefreak1776 11 points ago +12 / -1

Ok there mr handshake 6 hour old account.

-21
deleted -21 points ago +1 / -22
5
Genji_Sama 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Just trust someone blindly"

Don't care who says it, we are the party of no more blind trust. Trump's biggest weakness has always been trusting people he shouldn't.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
5
Spez_Isacuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

37 comments in this thread so far. You care too hard. Hope your check makes all the work worth it.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +1 / -11
-5
BasedInvestor -5 points ago +3 / -8

I like barnette, but I like winning senate races more. I don’t live in PA so I can’t make that hard choice

20
TheSphinxIsAFag 20 points ago +21 / -1

So between a Rino, a Dem, and a dark horse, you'd vote for the Rino bc you like "winning".

You are the epitome of what's wrong with people.

0
MAGA1775 0 points ago +2 / -2

All about that "sports team mentality."

We've had this mentality for over 4 decades now and look where it got us.

-7
BasedInvestor -7 points ago +2 / -9

If Trump thinks she can’t win I take his advice on it, because I’m not an expert. Even if Oz is a RINO, his name recognition alone undercuts the main accusation that republicans are extremists.

Fundamentally I’d rather win the senate race with a RINO if that’s what it takes. Oz will know who brought him to the dance.

But I’m not from PA, so not my duty to make this call

11
TheSphinxIsAFag 11 points ago +12 / -1

You are too dumb, I'm sorry. You try to rationalize voting for RINOs like they're not equal to dems. You should just change your affiliation and vote blue no matter who at this point. You're a lost cause here.

-1
BasedInvestor -1 points ago +1 / -2

The only thing I’m guilty of is caring less about Oz than I do McCarthy and McConnell.

1
Treefreak1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

So basically you are saying Trump thinks Oz will get the Democrats to vote for him?

0
Qwikphaze 0 points ago +1 / -1

He’s worried about weaponizung her race. She says some mean things, Trump shouldn’t be a hypocrite

-26
deleted -26 points ago +1 / -27
12
LurkingForTheWIN 12 points ago +12 / -0

And Trump was a meme candidate until he wasn't. And the MSM had all these same reasons you keep listing on why he couldnt ever possibly win, until he did.

6
BidenLikesMiners 6 points ago +6 / -0

And Kathy has 4 years of maga comments. Dr OZ has a few months of them.

Trump is getting the WORST kind of advisors right now.

51
EvJohn 51 points ago +54 / -3

I will NEVER, EVER vote for someone with dual citizenship.

And I'll go so far as to say that it's treasonous to do so.

An oversight by the founding fathers, to be sure. But that shit wasn't on their radar at the time.

16
-jjjjjjjjjj- 16 points ago +23 / -7

Its treasonous to vote for Jews and Muslims too because their religions command government to work in certain ways. Thus, no Jew or Muslim can lawfully fulfill their oath to the Constitution without becoming a sinner in their religion.

1
Kingofkek 1 point ago +3 / -2

How so?

2
Correndo 2 points ago +4 / -2

He literally just explained it right there.

I don't 100% agree with him, but he was pretty clear.

3
Kingofkek 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Religion commans govt to work in certain ways"

I'm asking in what ways

2
Correndo 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/sharia.aspx

Sharia is Islamic Law. It is the religious legal system that governs the political, social and moral duties of faithful Muslims. It is what is meant by "God's Law." Sharia is based on the Sunnah - the way of life of Muhammad as recorded in the Hadith (traditions). It is an organized body of rules derived from various Quran verses and historical narrations. Sharia is not optional; it is prescribed for believers (5:48). Although Muslims as individuals often decide which parts to follow or ignore, the Quran (33:36) says that it is not fitting for a believer to choose for themselves (i.e., disregard) any matter already decided by Allah.

I'm going to choose to believe you're very young, because I have a hard time believing someone could not know about sharia law otherwise.

https://search.brave.com <- You could've easily found your answers by using brave search.

2
Kingofkek 2 points ago +2 / -0

No I'm not very young. I understand the problems with Islam, but was mainly inquiring about his mentioning of jews in this context

1
Kingofkek 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said jews

2
-jjjjjjjjjj- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Go look up Sharia and Halakhah. Both contain sets of laws that the community is to abide by as part of their religions.

0
Tendiesandkekchup 0 points ago +2 / -2

If religious influence on our government is unconstitutional and treasonous, you’re going to have a bad time with your next social conservative arguments.

5
-jjjjjjjjjj- 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its not religious influence that's the issue. I have no problem with someone shaping their policy positions based on their religious beliefs. The problem is Judaism and Islam are not purely religions. They are systems of government. That's why devout Jewish communities and observant Islamic communities in the US all have their own religious governance body. Sharia patrols, Rabbi councils, they all exist to enforce Islamic or Jewish law on the community. It would be similarly bad if Christianity was doing that, but its not. Modern Christianity focuses on the individual and how the individual should live. It does not profess to require the community or society to behave or act in certain ways.

Because Jews and Muslims politicians necessarily have conflicting loyalty (religious law vs. American law), they should be ineligble for office and should not be allowed to participate in electing our representatives.

4
Genji_Sama 4 points ago +4 / -0

For real. If you want a place in government you should be required to renounce any other country's citizenship at a minimum.

-26
deleted -26 points ago +4 / -30
19
DinosaurAlert 19 points ago +20 / -1

Still voting Barnette.

Huh??!!? I watched CNN and they explained that all Trump supporters were part of a cult that does everything he says! That's why people vote for nazis!

Goddamit, if Trump posted that granite was delicious, i'd be the broken-toothed guy wearing the maga hat!

18
Just_wanted_darkmode 18 points ago +19 / -1

I hate to say it because I do love Trump but he did a pretty shit job picking people in his administration. He gets it right now and again Dr. Carson for example, but that’s an exception.

2
3percenterFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much this.

Though his press secretaries were awesome.

2
1woodland 2 points ago +3 / -1

I really like how we have to preface every genuine criticism with “I love him, but”

1
Just_wanted_darkmode 1 point ago +1 / -0

You get torched around here if you dont lol.

327
armedprincess23 327 points ago +334 / -7

Don’t care what he calls me I am not voting for Oz. And yes I live in PA.

130
GrumpyGrumpus 130 points ago +132 / -2

tell your neighbors

38
DefenderDad 38 points ago +38 / -0

Hey, I’m looking at moving to PA in the next few months. Any towns that are a majority of republicans and not an a too small town?

43
VulgarProfit 43 points ago +43 / -0

Most of PA is red, just don't move too close to Harrisburg Philly or Pittsburgh. How are you with cold and snow?

12
DefenderDad 12 points ago +12 / -0

I grew up in snow country of NY. Few blizzards in my childhood of 6+ feet. One of which was all in an 8 hour period.

4
Ghostbearstark_53 4 points ago +4 / -0

We have great snowmobiling in North central PA!

I have never been to tug Hill but it looks fairly boring compared to the shit we ride in the PA grand canyon. Tons of vista's and awesome views, basically none of it is flat.

And in the summer you can ride the same roads on motorcycle and we have a ton of townships that now allow UTV/AtVs, we can ride them like 80 miles from our cabin. Snowmobiling we have done 250 miles in a day.

As far as red towns go, further north the better, anything other than state college you will see Trump flags everywhere. I'm just south of Allentown and it's pretty cucked until you hit the based menonites in berks

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
19
armedprincess23 19 points ago +19 / -0

Further you get from Philly or Pittsburgh the more based the population. I used to do merchandise work and would travel all over the greater Pittsburgh area. Washington, Pa isn’t too small and it’s more Republican.

7
Zepp87 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm not in Butler itself but in the county. Half hour down 79/279 and I'm in Pittsburgh.

Based as fuck up here.

4
MAGASQUAD 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ive been working in saxonburg all week and taking all back roads from 68 to get there. Beautiful country in southern butler county. I moved to beaver co a few years ago and if things ever return to sanity im gonna try to covince my wife to move into butler co.

3
Zepp87 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saxonburg isn't bad. We use to keep our horses at a barn out there before we got our own place. Really pretty country, really shitty roads (I hate PennDot)

11
jtt888 11 points ago +11 / -0

Just like a lot of the country, cities are generally Democrat mayors for instance. But really Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are the biggest liberal havens. Much of PA is red.

8
RocksCanOnlyWait 8 points ago +8 / -0

Southeastern PA is dominated by Philadelphia. Philadelphia is just like any other large city which Democrats have destroyed. Northeastern PA has a lot of 1960s union Democrats (used to be a big coal mining area), and they get a lot of people fleeing NY. Southwestern PA is pretty good outside of Allegheny County (Pittsburgh). The rest of the state is relatively rural, with a small city every couple counties.

4
SwitchbladeDrone 4 points ago +5 / -1

Erie

9
ColdIceisCold 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ditto

7
RohdKill_2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Same Same

4
Thelongrun 4 points ago +8 / -4

Good for you, patriot.

282
TheBroodwich 282 points ago +282 / -0

We need to nominate RINOs to win? What is the point of winning if all you get is RINOs?

103
PaigeAshley 103 points ago +104 / -1

This^^

59
AlpineSeaHolly 59 points ago +60 / -1

But Oz is a demonrat so what's the difference if he wins against the other demonrat? We'll still get a demonrat.

I endorse Kathy Barnette who is one of us.

6
IntrepidBurger 6 points ago +8 / -2

RINO's sometimes vote along party lines. See the BBB bill.

Dems literally never do. It's insane to say they're the same.

10
Genji_Sama 10 points ago +10 / -0

Personally I'd rather have a Dem than a RINO. At least that way I'll no I'm gonna get fucked in the ass instead of it being a surprise.

Or... And hear me out, this might sound crazy... We could just actually elect someone who doesn't want to fuck is at all. Someone like Barnette.

You are basically saying "well that pedophile promised they wouldn't diddle kids so we should have them lead the daycare instead of the unrepentant pedo." And all the while there is a normal fucking human we could put in charge.

5
IntrepidBurger 5 points ago +7 / -2

You really don't. If the Dems had literally one more Senate vote they'd have rammed through countless bills, including vax mandates and others. It was RINO's who helped stopped those. They suck, don't get me wrong, but Dems are always worse. They never vote for you.

Someone like Barnette.

I like Barnette. She can't win in PA, however. It's too much of a purple state and anything that's remotely off from moderate loses there. Just a political reality. She'd be great in Texas, Florida, Tennessee, etc.

You aren't voting for Oz so much as you're voting against the commie Dem, which is really, really important right now. Literally one vote away from disaster.

35
MightyEighth 35 points ago +35 / -0

Trump really is old school and believes in loyalty, he probably thinks helping someone else will make them loyal to their cause.

In business he might be right, but in politics all that needs to happen is the cabal gets some blackmail.

16
Patriot3976 16 points ago +16 / -0

People to hate the Republican party on both sides.

2
Latin_Patriot_MAGA 2 points ago +5 / -3

well, hang them in the future.

it is easier to hang a known RINO than a RINO that hides with MAGA.

3
HappyHelper 3 points ago +3 / -0

No one gets hanged. Ever.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
241
Trumpwonbidencheated 241 points ago +241 / -0

Remember back in 2014 when Dr. Oz was praising Hillary Clinton? Just saying...

141
Ponzo 141 points ago +141 / -0

I saw these earlier

Dr. Oz: I hope all states enact red flag gun control laws https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue30YPas6Po

Dr. Oz promotes transgender ideology for toddlers, encourages "cutting edge" gender surgery for kids https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0Si8zEkyjY

Dr. Mehmet Oz says Dr. Anthony Fauci is a “pro” and “I respect him a lot” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDc7J9djKyM

Mehmet Oz says he would have voted in the Senate to certify the 2020 election for Joe Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HleMcrQbz7o

Mehmet Oz joins Joe Biden in criticizing President Trump's COVID travel restrictions against China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg6iivs-Kqk

Dr. Mehmet Oz said he “adores” and “loves” his “good friend” Jussie Smollett after hate crime hoax https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfHkfH124k0

Liberal Mehmet Oz calls Hillary Clinton "one of the smartest people I’ve ever met" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71TT7O1WXEQ

Dr. Oz praises China’s COVID response, says America must "copy" "draconian" lockdowns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVqvPH-fsUA

33
AlpineSeaHolly 33 points ago +33 / -0

He is clearly a democrat.

5
DONT_reply_with_THIS 5 points ago +5 / -0

And Trump endorsed him…. Wtf?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
0
dizzle_izzle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude I don't know. Especially when there is a perfectly based candidate right there.

9
QuickMaths 9 points ago +9 / -0

So can Barnette just put together some of the juicier clips as a commercial and let Oz’s own words self destruct his campaign?

1
Mshrm 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS

-75
deleted -75 points ago +3 / -78
62
ObamasLooseButthole 62 points ago +63 / -1

Lol you absolute retard.

23
Donger-Lord2 23 points ago +25 / -2

If only he knew.

15
paradox123 15 points ago +15 / -0

Don't be so harsh, he's probably an underpaid staffer . Well at least I hope he gets paid.

11
ARfreedom 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nah, he's too fucking stupid to realize he should be getting paid.

-49
deleted -49 points ago +3 / -52
36
ObamasLooseButthole 36 points ago +36 / -0

I hate him because he's anti 2a, pro abortion and pro trans. If that is the kind of stuff Trump is now endorsing then yes, I am very anti-Trump if he starts down this road.

You are absolutely not at all knowledgeable in the field of politics because you just said "And now he doesn’t support any of this, because that’s what it took to get a trump endorsement."

So he's saying he is against it now for an endorsement... he isn't actually against it. You have to have the most severe case of downs to actually believe he has completely went 180 on those positions. Fuck off cultist. Trump is solid but it is well known that he can't vet people worth a damn.

23
SHILL_DETECTOR 23 points ago +23 / -0

at least democrats believe their bullshit

why would i vote for someone who just wants to get elected?

-35
deleted -35 points ago +1 / -36
23
SHILL_DETECTOR 23 points ago +23 / -0

its not about voting for people who just want to get elected and will lie.

Dr. Oz: I hope all states enact red flag gun control laws https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue30YPas6Po

Dr. Oz promotes transgender ideology for toddlers, encourages "cutting edge" gender surgery for kids https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0Si8zEkyjY

Dr. Mehmet Oz says Dr. Anthony Fauci is a “pro” and “I respect him a lot” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDc7J9djKyM

Mehmet Oz says he would have voted in the Senate to certify the 2020 election for Joe Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HleMcrQbz7o

Mehmet Oz joins Joe Biden in criticizing President Trump's COVID travel restrictions against China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg6iivs-Kqk

Dr. Mehmet Oz said he “adores” and “loves” his “good friend” Jussie Smollett after hate crime hoax https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfHkfH124k0

Liberal Mehmet Oz calls Hillary Clinton "one of the smartest people I’ve ever met" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71TT7O1WXEQ

Dr. Oz praises China’s COVID response, says America must "copy" "draconian" lockdowns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVqvPH-fsUA

7
Hussar 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you truly cared about muh next generation, then you wouldn't be supporting a lunatic who spoke in favor of "reassignment" surgeries for children, i.e. the next generation.

0
dizzle_izzle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Virtue signal? Wrong site fag boy

12
xzibit_b 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes my fellow centipedes, The_Donald forum is anti Trump.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

KEK

6
HuggableBear 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey political science genius, I have a question for you.

You say he changed his positions to get an endorsement.

What if... He's lying?

We don't hate him because we're stupid. You say his job is to represent a platform. We hate him because we don't believe he will do that. We believe he's lying and once he's in office he'll just vote like the leftist he is.

-12
deleted -12 points ago +1 / -13
2
Genji_Sama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, your cover is blown

27
Ponzo 27 points ago +27 / -0

And then he gets to washington and fucks you in the ass, raw, by voting for gun control bills, trannyfying your kids and selling you out to China.

-39
deleted -39 points ago +1 / -40
26
Porkbut 26 points ago +26 / -0

Are you trying for the Guinness record of fallacies and hypocritical irony in one thread? Because ive submitted you for review.

-30
deleted -30 points ago +1 / -31
16
Porkbut 16 points ago +16 / -0

Lol and the desperation rears its ugly head, thats the best you can muster? Please continue, I wouldnt want to interrupt your thrashings and make you reconsider.

14
Ponzo 14 points ago +14 / -0

You sound like the guy who always shills for One-eyed-Willy Crenshaw

-23
deleted -23 points ago +1 / -24
13
paradox123 13 points ago +14 / -1

We are not siding with her because she is black idiot. No one selected her for being black.

The Muslim Turk also qualifies under these rules as a diversity hire, by the way.

20
ARfreedom 20 points ago +20 / -0

Words are cheap you retard. What has Oz done to show he's honestly changed on those positions? Has he donated to anti red flag organizations? Has he used his celebrity to highlight the stories of kids that transitioned and come to realize what a mistake it was? Has he refused to get the jab, or wear a mask, filed any lawsuits against the illegal CDC mandates? Has he done anything to expose the stolen 2020?

I really like how you couldn't even provide a single source showing Oz has flipped position on any of the points Ponzo highlighted.

-28
deleted -28 points ago +1 / -29
19
ARfreedom 19 points ago +19 / -0

Oh look I was 100% correct you wouldn't be able to provide an ounce of evidence.

Trump also selected Gina Haspel, Anthony Scaramucci, Rex Tillerson, James Mattis, John Kelly, Nikki Haley, Mike Pence, Jeff Sessions, William Barr, just to name a few people selected by Trump that ended up stabbing him in the back or fighting against him. Trump isn't perfect, he doesn't always select the best person for a job.

But hey, you want to worship a golden calf, you go right ahead. Personally I won't since that doesn't tend to work out well in the long run.

-19
deleted -19 points ago +1 / -20
9
ARfreedom 9 points ago +9 / -0

They all had the appearance of being supportive MAGA people when selected, hence the support. Oz doesn't even have the appearance.

What's more logical?

Supporting someone with an acceptable history that might betray your goals (like the ones I named) or supporting someone with a history that's antithetical to everything you believe (like Oz)?

Let me guess, you'll respond with just more ad hominem fallacies or nothing of substance at all.

14
Hussar 14 points ago +14 / -0

Well that's a relief. I was about to call him an opportunistic, self-interested grifter who flip-flops for convenience like a professional politician, but I now see that I was terribly mistaken.

Lol

-27
deleted -27 points ago +1 / -28
15
Hussar 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lol I don't care. He also endorsed John McCain in 2016. What's your point?

4
Sleepwoker2 4 points ago +4 / -0

REEEEEE!!!!

25
peterthegreen 25 points ago +25 / -0
-37
MaltipooSaysWoof -37 points ago +6 / -43

fuck off cucks. barnette wanted a statue of barry obongo for being 'the best black president ever'.

barnette will get curbstomped in november by the commie fetterman.

14
wwwchae 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can you refer to when mentioned?

17
Joaniev9 17 points ago +17 / -0

And not anything posted by unhinged Grenell.

6
EagleI 6 points ago +6 / -0

Saw the petition though I can't verify it is really her who set it up. But if real, it was when the leftists were pulling down and defacing statues and they wanted to do the same to the Emancipation one in DC because they thought the slave was crouched next to Lincoln rather than rising. She argued that statues should not be torn down and history erased and instead more statues should be added next to it, including first black president and Frederick Douglas.

3
BidenLikesMiners 3 points ago +3 / -0

In 1876, in honor of President Abraham Lincoln and the over 700,000 men who died in the Civil War, a statue portraying the late President and a former slave was created and dedicated in Lincoln Park in Washington, D.C. It is known as the Emancipation Memorial Statue and was funded by former slaves to honor Lincoln.

Today, this statue has become a point of contention as the former slave is portrayed crouching (or rising, depending on who you ask) at Lincoln’s feet. There is an effort to remove it because many people feel that it depicts the freed slave in a perpetual subservient position.

This is a concern that should be addressed, however, tearing down what represents our past is not the answer for our nation's future. Instead, the best way to heal our nation is to continue to tell its story. This is why we're proposing new markers and monuments that display America's evolution as it continues down that path of becoming a more perfect union.

7
Sleepwoker2 7 points ago +7 / -0

"BuT yOuLl VoTe FoR hEr BeCaUsE sHe'S sTiLl NoT a DeMoCrAt!!!!! 111??.!"

Isn't that your customary line when shilling for Oz?

7
Dallasguy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well…he is.

6
AlcoholicRetard 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also the gayest black president.

6
Dallasguy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also the most foreign-born black president. Also…the least foreign-born black president.

4
Hussar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everyone else: "Here's a phone book-sized list of terrible things that Oz has said and done."

You: "BUT I FOUND THIS ONE THING THAT BARNETTE SAID THAT'S BAD"

Lather, rinse, repeat.

For once, can you make the case for Oz without crying about Barnette? You remind me of the Democrats trying to justify their votes for Hillary.

"We have to vote for Hillary because Trump is bad!"

"Why should we vote for Hillary? She's terrible."

"Shut up! Trump bad!"

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but that was in the past, theyre different now otherwise they wouldnt get the MAGA endorsement. < Your logic for Oz

15
Sumarongi 15 points ago +15 / -0

Trump praised Hillary in the past

11
Spengler-3000 11 points ago +11 / -0

And then said she suffered enough rather than prosecuting her lol.

12
EvJohn 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'll take:

cannot be explained

for $1,000, Alex.

This is really a pretty disgusting mess.

6
VenusDe 6 points ago +8 / -2

Remember back in 2016 when JD Vance was voting for McMullin and calling Trump a racist?

Just saying . . . Things change. You adapt or die.

You seem to be choosing "die."

3
BidenLikesMiners 3 points ago +3 / -0

JD Vance was voting for McMullin

Then hes still a mcmullin fan.

206
cjcivicx 206 points ago +209 / -3

I have to respectfully disagree with his pick here. Oz is a fucking lunatic.

70
TheThreeSeashells 70 points ago +70 / -0

I have to respectfully disagree

Which is the difference between us and the Left. If they were told to go out and vote for someone, they would all fall into line and never challenge their overlords.

We don't just blindly follow everything President Trump says. The Left never has and never will understand how that's possible.

Feels good, man.

16
cjcivicx 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's a blessing and a curse, and why we have so much infighting on the right, leading to us being unable to coalesce behind a unified idea.

2
acasper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Woodchippers. I think we can all agree on that.

1
TheThreeSeashells 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Not everyone can obtain and learn to operate helicopters.

-44
deleted -44 points ago +4 / -48
21
TheThreeSeashells 21 points ago +21 / -0

Trump is way smarter than you.

OK, Mr. Handshake account who joined up six hours ago and only comments in this post and put up a bunch of anti-Barnette spam.

I knew Pence was a snake long before Trump figured it out. The DAY he was picked as the VP everyone asked me what I thought and I told them, "I hate the pick. Pence caved on the Religious Freedom Act and turned on his supporters and party in doing so. He can't be trusted. He's not a fighter and he's not MAGA."

I was way smarter than Trump on that one. Would you like to move on to the AG and SCROTUS picks? Let's talk about hiring Omarosa? Or do you have to get back to licking Dr. Oz's asshole?

I also notice you never point out A SINGLE THING that would convince anyone to support Dr. Oz. It's just a litany of anti-Barnette bullshit and insults. So if Oz is such a great candidate and a great MAGA pick, why not point out exactly what qualifies him for that honor? Let's hear his take on "vaccines" and shutdowns and masks. Or has he flip-flopped for the 552nd time on those already? How about his support for groomers? Is convincing our children to go on hormone therapy, start acting like the opposite gender from which they were born, and destroing their lives MAGA now?

-25
deleted -25 points ago +1 / -26
5
TheThreeSeashells 5 points ago +5 / -0

You should probably look up the definition of ad hominem before throwing it around. Particularly since you're doing EXACTLY that all over this site.

(Also, linking to memes you created and posted specifically to try to defend your argument isn't an argument.)

I specified exactly why I was smarter than Trump because I knew Pence was a piece of shit long before he was selected as VP. I said the same the second he hired Omarosa. Just to name two examples. How is that "ad hominem?" By the way, I don't care why he picked any of those assholes. I disagreed with him and I was proven correct. If you think the way to be MAGA means blindly accepting everything President Trump does or says, you're wrong. Remember, he also promoted the hell out of "Project Warp Speed" and then was telling people at rallies, to a chorus of "boos", that the "CCP Virus vaccine" was perfectly safe. We know that's completely false.

I asked you specific questions and you didn't even address them. I also notice there's not ONE single comment or post where you can explain EXACTLY how Oz is a MAGA pick. Forget MAGA...you can't even point out why he would be a sort of decent pick. Meanwhile, I outlined specific reasons why he wouldn't be. You lose. My facts outweigh your insults.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9
6
TheThreeSeashells 6 points ago +6 / -0

You don’t know anything about Pence

I stated the specific reason I didn't trust Pence. It's not a state secret. Everyone knows EXACTLY what Pence did in regard to the Religious Freedom Act. There were plenty of "trust the plan" folks who also trusted him. Then I was proven right when he stabbed Trump, and the country, in the back again in January 2021.

You still have yet to state any specifics on why anyone who is MAGA should support Oz. You're answer cannot be "Because President Trump told us to." That's not a reason.

You lose again handshake/shill.

6
cjcivicx 6 points ago +6 / -0

Had to make a new account because you're too much of a coward to post on your real one, huh?

Hard to take you seriously, little bitch.

9
IncredibleMrE1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Some of its accounts that got shitcanned just in the last few days are DesantisCantMatchDon and ZoomerLoser, ZoomerLoser3, 5, 6, 7, 8. If you don't worship the clotshot, want to exterminate everyone under the age of 30, and blindly follow Trump as if he's God, this faggot shill will eventually show up. Obvious forum sliding operative.

5
cjcivicx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Figured as much.

3
LurkingForTheWIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

This faggot is zoomerloser? Figures...now I just feel stupid for even being baiting into a response from this imbecile...

-18
deleted -18 points ago +1 / -19
12
cjcivicx 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Censor me for wrongthink" = "I rage like a toddler then get downvoted or deported because I think I'm more intelligent than everyone else..."

-15
deleted -15 points ago +1 / -16
8
cjcivicx 8 points ago +8 / -0

No one is censoring you. You sound like a garden variety lunatic that thinks everyone is out to get them.

4
Sleepwoker2 4 points ago +5 / -1

Almost... Except Trump is saying "Swing this hammer that is labeled as one that exclusively hits you in the face but someone put a sticker over it."

And you say "Well, Trump said swing it, and it does have the sticker....."

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
1
Sleepwoker2 1 point ago +2 / -1

You keep saying that.... Yet never say how. Obama statue? Uses racial language? OZ IS A LITERAL FUCKING SNAKE OIL SALESMAN!. Honestly.... Fuck's wrong with you...

4
cjcivicx 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've come to the conclusion that this is either an Anaconda alt or just a new troll. They were crying about being censored by the mods, who explicitly told them they were censoring them, but when asked for proof they pulled the "not worth my time to prove it" card.

Just another looney tune.

2
Sleepwoker2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. But it's fun to poke the trolls! They make silly noises.

2
BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

he argues with himself from time to time

16
freebirdie 16 points ago +16 / -0

I disrespectfully disagree with him, and frankly, I'm sick and fucking tired of him endorsing RINOs and other establishment phonies.

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Strange/Moore, The GA mess for Senate etc etc if we can't get a good candidate it's fucked from the get-go (even if we win). This shit show is unfortunately a lose-lose scenario.

167
shadilayylmao 167 points ago +167 / -0

I don't buy it.

141
Get2Gab 141 points ago +144 / -3

He's as right on this as he was about vaccines.

55
4DHopscotch 55 points ago +56 / -1

And Sessions, Barr, Wray, Kushner, J6 invites, Mccarthy, McConnells wife, McConnell, Lindsay Gayrams advice etc etc

5
f_bastiat 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be fair, most of these we didn't find out were bad picks until after the fact. Unfortunately Trump wasnt all knowing and sometimes all his options were shit or worse shit. That being said, I think Oz was an attempt to guarantee an R over a Dem, even if a RINO. Hell, I had to vote fo Rick Scott and I can't stand his guts but I couldn't risk a Dem getting in.

42
Thelongrun 42 points ago +47 / -5

💯

19
TrumpWonByALandslide 19 points ago +21 / -2

Completely agree. I think Barnette has a better chance against Fetterman.

7
NotAQTardFaggot 7 points ago +7 / -0

And Romney and sessions and Wray and Barr and Graham and Kelly and Esper and every single person except Stephen Miller?

7
Joaniev9 7 points ago +7 / -0

Bigly

141
MythArcana 141 points ago +148 / -7

In other words, it's all about Trump's perfect endorsement record.

79
deleted 79 points ago +89 / -10
42
MythArcana 42 points ago +46 / -4

Yeeeup! This is the flip side of the Trump coin. Things bounce off him like bullets to Superman, which is exactly what we need, but we have to take the arrogance that comes with it. You can't have the pedigree pup without the poop, unfortunately.

20
StoryTimeHour 20 points ago +20 / -0

I would say it leans more towards his political clout. A good CEO knows which metrics to bring to a board meeting to sell confidence to uninformed bystanders. I would love for the MAGA crowd to take a stand on this one and show Trump that we are stronger than the fake news political slander.

2
Dereliction 2 points ago +2 / -0

The stellar endorsement record is the ticket to controlling the direction of the party. It's not merely ego at all.

-34
deleted -34 points ago +6 / -40
18
AngeredKabar 18 points ago +21 / -3

You seem like one too, sooo

-23
deleted -23 points ago +4 / -27
3
HappyHelper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump is endorsing what is obviously a bad pick. All you have to do is see what this guy has said in recent history:

https://patriots.win/p/15Hv2RPwvI/x/c/4OYXDunPoxM

Do you want that as your representative in Congress?

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
25
DefenderDad 25 points ago +25 / -0

He’s looking at becoming a king maker. If he bats 1000 during midterms, 2024 will be a purging of all never trumpers.

I see the long play, but us choosing someone who is maga will strike a bigger blow to the RINOs. We need the RINOs to back us up or lose their position. We the people need to seize this power and wield it the way it is meant to be.

5
Spez_Isacuck 5 points ago +6 / -1

I don't want a king maker. I want my fucking country back.

3
Dereliction 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do you think the king maker can do?

2
IntrepidBurger 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol, right? People here are sometimes a bit clueless.

1
Qwikphaze 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hopefully not turn his back on his people.

1
Spez_Isacuck 1 point ago +3 / -2

He can stop endorsing faggots.

4
deleted 4 points ago +8 / -4
2
Ophelia 2 points ago +2 / -0

2022 is for the RINOs and 2024 is for MAGA.

Makes half sense but don’t forget these new RINO senators will be there for SIX YEARS.

15
willy-willis 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's not even perfect anymore already, the guy he endorsed to become Nebraska's next governor lost his primary like two days ago.

12
Sleepwoker2 12 points ago +13 / -1

I'm worried this is it more than anything

6
johnqpublic864 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's hardly perfect. He's endorsed other losers.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
122
OriginalPrimitive 122 points ago +122 / -0

What is in her past? A tweet, a facebook post? WTF?

122
IncredibleMrE1 122 points ago +122 / -0

Especially compared to Oz's long history of promoting tranny children, abortion, gun grabbing and red flag laws, socialized healthcare, the list goes on - not to mention his affiliation with the WEF?

28
Data 28 points ago +28 / -0

This absolutely. Whatever it is, Oz's history is way more problematic. He is not MAGA in the slightest so I could really give a shit about his ability to beat the Democrat. Just another Romney as far as I'm concerned.

14
muy_libre 14 points ago +16 / -2

He’s Trump’s TV buddy. That’s it. That’s the reason.

9
MoreTorbaLessKushner 9 points ago +12 / -3

When I first heard the uproar about Oz, I thought it might be been overblown.

But then I looked into some of the shit he's said...

1
BatmanForTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also Dr. Oz literally admitted to Congress that he endorsed drugs on his show just because, some he admitted he knew didn't work or were actually dangerous, so someone that's admitted that they'd say anything as long as they're paid to is somehow going to be an honest person that wants the best for America, right

1
InTheArmsOfThePepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said!

You wanna compare pasts? Lez go!

Is GEOTUS or Oz ever going to address that elephant in the room?

26
BeefyBelisarius 26 points ago +26 / -0

Maybe a signed yearbook and a fraudulent accuser, like what happened to Roy Moore?

2
SwitchbladeDrone 2 points ago +7 / -5

No. Roy Moore is actually a perv.

9
BeefyBelisarius 9 points ago +10 / -1

Or so the MSM wanted us to believe.

0
SwitchbladeDrone 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why would you simp for a fucking diddler like Moore? Think for a minute what kind of credible evidence it would take for a DEMOCRAT to beat a Republican in Alabama.

Are you good with a 32 year old man dating your high school age daughter? If so, you're an unfit parent.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you simping for the corporate media that's been lying to us for decades? The only thing that was proven as fact is that he dated someone over the age of consent, but with an awkwardly large gap in their ages.

The media, of course, exaggerated an lied as always, leaving people like you with the impression that he dated someone below the age of consent. Although you may notice they never explicitly stated that, since he would have been able to sue anyone explicitly calling him a diddler for slander.

1
SwitchbladeDrone 1 point ago +1 / -0

The corporate media didn't lie about this at all. As you noted, no one called him a diddler. But, because the girl was still in HIGH SCHOOL and he was in his 30's and a local prosecutor- people perceive that as really, really fucking CREEPY. Being over the age of consent doesn't make it any less creepy. In fact, the conservative, Republican voters of Alabama found it so fucking creepy they elected a Democrat instead. In Alabama, the only thing worse than a diddler is a Democrat. So you can draw your own conclusion from that. BTW, as a parent- would you be OK with your high school aged daughter dating Roy Moore?

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

That wasn't the only allegation, just the only substantiated one. But I didn't bring up Moore to get sidetracked discussing his creepy past relationship.

No, Moore is relevant because this board went hard for him during the primary, while Trump endorsed an establishment guy. We helped him win, then all the allegations came out.

-2
Athena86 -2 points ago +3 / -5

He was. For years.

6
Dallasguy 6 points ago +7 / -1

If he were, they wouldn’t have had to fake the evidence.

3
cjcivicx 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yup.

16
MyPersonalExp 16 points ago +16 / -0

If she was a Dem, her black vagina would open so many doors and make her invincible. But it’s a liability for conservatives apparently…. Because we let it be a liability, maybe?

5
TDmaga 5 points ago +9 / -4

Tweets - one mentioning sitting next to a homosexual woman on a plane, another calling Obama a Muslim. Also a good amount of anti-Trump stuff back in 2015/2016

They’re things that the suburban housewife will cringe at, and it’s perfect ammo for liberal ads

22
IncredibleMrE1 22 points ago +26 / -4

Gays need to be put back in the closet where they belong. We went from "just let us get married" to "LET US GROOM YOUR 5 YEAR OLD YOU HOMOPHOBIC BIGOT" in less than a decade. Anyone who gets triggered about someone calling Obama a moslem is just looking for an excuse to vote Democrat. And the "but muh anti-Trump comments in 2015/16" line is complete and utter bullshit in light of his endorsement of JD Vance.

18
TheThreeSeashells 18 points ago +18 / -0

The anti-Trump stuff is weak shit. That happened during a time where a lot of people were unsure about him.

As for the rest, she should just own it. It would be a breath of fresh air in politics. If she's worried about "suburban housewives" just run around reminding them that the Left wants to kill their children and Oz wants to suffocate and poison them. Repeat it over and over and issue ZERO apologies when those demands start coming in.

11
jtt888 11 points ago +11 / -0

Liberals will just make up ammo if they need to. Never vote based on what liberals might do.

4
6
Sleepwoker2 6 points ago +6 / -0

First tweet:

Whatever. She can fuck right off with that nonsense but she's black and it's ingrained deep. I'll let that one slide because I've never met a black person who doesn't have a little of that.

The second one is funny. I mean, I hate it because shoe on the other foot you would be crucified, but she's not wrong 🤷.

Either way, Oz has a past full of Dem talking points. That can't be what we want as our "good candidate".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Spez_Isacuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Meh.

115
Mitchenson 115 points ago +115 / -0

I love GEOTUS but I really think he is wrong here. Ditch Oz and back Barnette!

23
StoryTimeHour 23 points ago +24 / -1

Makes me wonder if 2022 Trump would have endorsed Trump during the 2016 run.

3
Mitchenson 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he would. Havjng said that I think he's playing 'safe' and I'm not sure why, he knows his base doesn't like RINOs so who is he trying to appeal to with their endorsements?

-1
MAGA1775 -1 points ago +1 / -2

By Trump's latest "logic" he likely would have said Trump was too MAGA and thus not electable, so we have to back Jeb as the only option to "stop the Democrats."

It is odd how Trump partnered with the establishment and has been siding with them on everything since Jan 6th.

-41
deleted -41 points ago +6 / -47
35
TrumpWonByALandslide 35 points ago +35 / -0

We know that Oz is a liberal Democrat and an asshole who will say anything to get elected, and that a lot (not all) of the attacks on Barnette were false.

10
AlpineSeaHolly 10 points ago +10 / -0

What do you know?

-19
deleted -19 points ago +4 / -23
18
AlpineSeaHolly 18 points ago +18 / -0

"designed"? Who designed her?

OZ is a democrat. A DEMOCRAT!!!!!!!

-20
deleted -20 points ago +3 / -23
10
stingyarthropods 10 points ago +10 / -0

he endorsed a bunch of rinos who are worse than democrats. oz is a faggot. mcconnell is a faggot.

9
PatriotScience 9 points ago +10 / -1

Sorry you little dumb ass spoiled baby brat, but Trump is wrong here. You can suck my dick I been here longer than most, I don't give a shit about your FED GLOWIE opinion. I love what Trump did but he has been wrong he's not fucking God you imbecile. Get your dick out of your mouth and use your fucking brain you jelly brained amoeboid.

7
cjcivicx 7 points ago +7 / -0

This little faggot is crying because the "Mods told them they were censoring him" and that he's been here since before P.Win. when asked for proof he just goes off on a rage lol.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
4
PatriotScience 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck of Faggot, we dont need Dr. Oz supporters here. Go suck another dick besides your own.

5
Mitchenson 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know I like her better than Oz non fren

-11
deleted -11 points ago +1 / -12
3
whataboob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe. But we know a bunch about Ozzzzz.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
4
whataboob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, like he knows vaccines.

Now #GetBoosted, Oz shill.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
2
whataboob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol ? What?

You’re pro vaxxine? Stop.

Let me be clear, I’ll dump and denounce Trump long before I take that trash vaxxine, in a heart beat.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
97
ExorcistCandy 97 points ago +97 / -0

Dr. Oz will be a total rino shit show. Bad call.

11
PlatinumFMorgan 11 points ago +11 / -0

If he gets in, he'll make Mittens look like a patriot.

2
toxicmale13 2 points ago +2 / -0

He'll be a male version of Susan Collins. 🤮

-39
Landofthefreeee -39 points ago +3 / -42

Howwww? Based on what. He said the same stuff Trump said about abortion. Like ughh people change.

33
ExorcistCandy 33 points ago +34 / -1

I don’t care about abortion. He supported hill dog and hormones for trans kids

-18
Landofthefreeee -18 points ago +2 / -20

So did Trump! Look at what he said about Jenner.

22
peterthegreen 22 points ago +22 / -0

When did Trump ever endorse hormones for trans kids? And Bruce was already a senior citizen when he went all tranny on us.

19
ExorcistCandy 19 points ago +19 / -0

Jenner is a grown adult that can mutilate himself all he wants. Supporting trans anything for children is abuse.

93
Tired 93 points ago +93 / -0

I don't know Barnett's past. But I do know oz will screw us.

55
Roadrash 55 points ago +55 / -0

Correct:

Barnette might screw us, might... I 100% know Oz will screw us.

16
AlpineSeaHolly 16 points ago +16 / -0

EXACTLY!!!

4
lestork 4 points ago +4 / -0

A Republican Manchin so to say.

30
maga_mama_757 30 points ago +30 / -0

He's listening to crap the Oz camp is spreading.

8
deleted 8 points ago +12 / -4
10
EvJohn 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not only that, but being a dual citizen is a prima facia NO from me. Every time.

72
maga_mama_757 72 points ago +72 / -0

Was this really necessary? He can edorse whomever he wants. The people will decide whether that endorsement works for them. I don't see the need to make a statement about why someone other than the candidate he picked - in his opinion - can't win.

She would win if she had his backing.

30
PaigeAshley 30 points ago +30 / -0

This^^^

9
txdrew 9 points ago +15 / -6

Actually, this is exactly what you want from a leader. He listened to our complaints, and explained his position. When was the last time a politician did that?

-43
deleted -43 points ago +5 / -48
27
OKRancher 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yeah, we’re the shills. It’s definitely not the handshake talking shit on the best candidate.

-40
deleted -40 points ago +1 / -41
23
OKRancher 23 points ago +23 / -0

You’re welcome to leave and not come back.

-33
deleted -33 points ago +1 / -34
21
OKRancher 21 points ago +21 / -0

Get fucked, fed.

ETA: You made this account for the sole purpose of denigrating Kathy. It’s in your fucking username.

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
10
Murica_Jer 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why are there so many Oz shills here?

-18
deleted -18 points ago +1 / -19
7
TeamOrangeFB 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lol, most of Trump's admin picks ended up being RINO traitors. He's not perfect.

Dr RINOz is garbage.

1
TrannyClausSliceDice 1 point ago +1 / -0

He probably is

I fucking hate Oz but i mean i feel like trump has his reasons? We don’t have to agree with every damn thing he thinks or does

4
Spez_Isacuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Go back to reddit.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
1
TrannyClausSliceDice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude i can assure you majority of us are definitely pro trump.

It’s okay to disagree about Oz/ Barnette.

Oz is a cuck but I’m not gonna hate too hard as trump obviously has his reasons. Personally I like Barnette but who cares?

Why are you getting so mad?

I LOVE Trump. Best President EVER imo and I want him to win 2024 BADLY. I will vote for him with bells on.

I still disagree with him about his super duper MUH vaccine love but ya know what?that’s okay too. We don’t have to agree 100% with EVERY fucking thing Trump does?

Relax pede

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
9
Aiur1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

Uh Anti Islam and Anti Gay tweets make me vote harder. Not disqualify her.

7
stingyarthropods 7 points ago +7 / -0

remember that trucker from new jersey? he spent less than 10k for his entire campaign and won against the longest running senate president in nj history. you don't need money to win rofl. just because you happen the love that faggot oz doesn't mean we have to.

-11
deleted -11 points ago +1 / -12
5
stingyarthropods 5 points ago +6 / -1

yes. oz is a faggot. most of trumps picks have been pure shit. he is still praising the clot shot.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +2 / -12
5
stingyarthropods 5 points ago +5 / -0

mcconnell is fine? the clot shot isn't fine. your iq is lower than the iq of a gnat. oz is a faggot. 0/10 troll. i've seen better trolls over 20 years ago on habbo hotel. go back to reddit.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not fine to support a product that was bribed through approvals without testing and used as a cudgel to punish the uncompliant.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-11
deleted -11 points ago +1 / -12
10
PatriotScience 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trump picked Pence, you can't possibly think he's infallible unless you're a Great Awakening tard?

-13
deleted -13 points ago +1 / -14
1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

If she will lose, why does Trump feel the need to make a statement?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
whataboob 1 point ago +1 / -0

!! George Floyd?

Any source?

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
2
NotAQTardFaggot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Remember when Hannity said the same thing?

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
2
whataboob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice. Yeah, she seems to be not as clean as some make her out to be.

But she said nothing about a statue. And also, this extended clip kinda lightens the harm of the original one. https://mobile.twitter.com/lavern_spicer/status/1524383263749459968

At least she’s not pro BLM. Also, if that Floyd clip was earlier, before the trial, maybe her opinion also changed?

Either way, this is also worrisome as it’s genuine idiocy.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
1
whataboob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mm, true.

I mixed up our thread with another comment I read that said she wanted a GF statue.

71
LearnedHat 71 points ago +71 / -0

I am willing to give her a shot. Get some establishment cuck in there and it won't be as bad as the dem for a term but you will never be able to leverage him out of the seat in a primary race. A RINO is truly a gift that keeps on not giving for years.

17
Jackhererer 17 points ago +17 / -0

Rhinos are worse then democrats. We all know what Democrats will do. Rhinos give us hope then shit all over us.

6
jtt888 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trust me. We don't need another Pat Toomey.

63
Patriot3976 63 points ago +65 / -2

Picks Mike Pence as a running mate.

22
TheNightJanitor 22 points ago +24 / -2

Underrated comment.

8
AlpineSeaHolly 8 points ago +9 / -1

Under-underrated comment

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
57
tellittothedead1 57 points ago +60 / -3

Love Trump but fuck him for saying this. He's only doing it because faggot Oz is getting crushed

16
Thelongrun 16 points ago +19 / -3

🎯

1
ThreeTermTrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

What is it he's doing?

-7
txdrew -7 points ago +2 / -9

You mean he listened to his base and responded with an explanation of his thought process. Just like we were all posting in here “why did he back oz?” Well, now we know. The key here is that he is listening to his base and not just leading like a dictator.

13
Donger-Lord2 13 points ago +13 / -0

If he was listening, he’d recind the endorsement.

-4
txdrew -4 points ago +1 / -5

Trump likes to win, even with rinos. Barnette won’t get any votes from the center which is needed in PA.

9
NotAQTardFaggot 9 points ago +10 / -1

He’s getting ratiod on his own truth in his own social media platform.

It’s a loser

2
Oz_watch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump responded with FUD. He just raised doubts based on nothing. If he had something to complain about he knows how to spear someone with a few pithy lines of takedown. He's got nothing.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re right. But he’s also wrong.

1
txdrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. He did leave the door open for changing his endorsement to her by saying she needs to explain herself. Not from PA(username checks out) but it seems like you need votes from the center to win there, at least that’s what I’m hearing but I’ve been wrong before too

4
tellittothedead1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pa is MAGA country. They cheated more in Pa than just about any other state.

0
txdrew 0 points ago +1 / -1

Did y’all get rid of the machines and mail in voting? If not it doesn’t matter and you will need those votes to beat the cheat.

He did leave the door open to switch his endorsement to her if she explains herself.

2
tellittothedead1 2 points ago +3 / -1

And what hasn’t been properly explained? Asking rhetorically. Dr Oz has a much worse history than she does. Trump needs to shut the fuck up on this one.

54
PaigeAshley 54 points ago +54 / -0

That...is nonsense! Mr. President, you always said if you put your endorsement behind an underdog, that underdog would WIN, because they are MAGA and the people want MAGA.

Please, don't just pick to endorse someone like Oz just because you think only he has a chance at winning. If he's a bloody RINO it's the same as losing to a Dem!

9
lestork 9 points ago +9 / -0

word!

0
MAGA1775 0 points ago +2 / -2

Agree. Whatever happened to fighting for what was right, no matter what?

I feel like the MAGA movement is being hijacked.....ever since Trump was ousted, he's surrounded himself with the likes of Hannity, Graham, and other neocon RINOs and I think they are whispering stuff in his ear in an effort to create the mentality that "MAGA isn't electable." So we have to support the same-old establishment/globalist politicians as our only option to "stop the Democrats."

You notice how Trump no longer talks about globalism, the uniparty, or the swamp anymore?

Its really strange.

48
tdmort 48 points ago +48 / -0

Nope. Sorry Trump. Youre wrong.

-22
Diotima -22 points ago +2 / -24

Is he? Wtf do we know about Kathy Barnette. For all we know she’s just as bad as Oz.

3
Oz_watch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know how bad Oz is, take a chance on Kathy.

47
deleted 47 points ago +60 / -13
-64
deleted -64 points ago +5 / -69
20
Juanye 20 points ago +20 / -0

What’s a jabtriot?

17
OKRancher 17 points ago +18 / -1

Apparently a new word the commies have made up.

6
Tyrone_biggums 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s a term I have seen only True Believer Trump cultists (ie, those who believe anything Trump likes is good) used to disparage anyone criticizing covid injections. I think it comes from this one poster just posting under different handles, honestly

6
Juanye 6 points ago +6 / -0

The guy above me seems to be using it to attack a guy who’s disagreeing with Trump lol

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
Spez_Isacuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deport.

-13
deleted -13 points ago +1 / -14
6
Porkbut 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think a retarded dog would mop the floor with you in debate. Probably make you cry too.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +1 / -11
7
Porkbut 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then why are you crying?

10
4DHopscotch 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lol and there he/she/it is. Didn't you get banned yesterday?

6
Beardicus 6 points ago +6 / -0

There are no one in this world that I agree 100% with. The same should be true for everyone. If you agree with Trump on everything you need to reexamine your values and learn to form your own opinions.

Trump is wrong here.

2
user365927285937 2 points ago +2 / -0

^ Found Oz’s account

43
Roadrash 43 points ago +43 / -0

So:

Barnette has a past that is so terrible he won’t even say what is so terrible about it, but Oz has a terrible past that is well documented because he’s said/done it all on television/radio.

Sorry, Don, this makes no sense. If there is something to say than come out and say it.

5
DarkRiver 5 points ago +5 / -0

The said past are her tweets and Facebook posts which are nothing serious. Grenell, warmongering Lindsay Graham and the other RINOs are going after her now because Oz is sinking. They didn't bother when Oz was ahead.

2
txdrew 2 points ago +3 / -1

Would you rather know a person’s stance so you can counter it or get blindsided by someone you know nothing about?

12
Roadrash 12 points ago +12 / -0

Does Oz truly believe his opinions he expressed for decades on television/radio, or does he now believe the complete opposite views because he made a campaign advertisement?

The justification we have to support Oz over Barnette are as follows:

Oz: he’s my friend and great.

Barnette: she’s bad because stuff I won’t tell you.

How on earth can any person capable of independent and critical thought buy that as justification to vote one way or another? It’s insulting and in now way explains away the issues people have with Oz.

2
txdrew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Grenell posted all the things from her past yesterday. He doesn’t want to attack her in case he sees she can win then he can still endorse her. No fan of Oz here, but I appreciate the explanation from Trump, at least he’s listening.

7
Roadrash 7 points ago +7 / -0

you should research what Grenell posted and see if what he posted was an accurate portrayal of Barnette.

1
txdrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I’m aware, I’m just letting you know where to find it and it obviously spells defeat for her because only the hardcore righties like ourselves will vote for her which won’t work in PA

4
PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +5 / -1

One of the things he posted was when she used a #BLM hashtag in a post where she linked a video critical of BLM. Because Grenell either doesn't understand what hashtags are, or he's just buttmad and is hoping you don't.

1
txdrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I know. I was just pointing to where they could be found

42
HerrnMalor 42 points ago +42 / -0

I disagree

41
crackerstacker 41 points ago +42 / -1

Well at least he is telling us his thought process straight. It would be fun watch the left spending tons of resources on preventing a black woman from being elected tho.

38
Organist1022 38 points ago +38 / -0

Pedophilia IS embedded in Islam. Truth. (One of her tweets)

Grenell was on Bannon this morning, sounded unhinged. He said that Kathy Barnette stated that she doesn't want to sit next to a gay person on an airplane. Yes, he SAID that. Where is that in print? If that were out there, UNEDITED, wouldn't it have been front and center forever?

Gay people ALWAYS lead with these issues. When your sexuality is your identity, it's a problem. It's an obsession.

16
BigIgloo 16 points ago +16 / -0

Based if true.

14
NakaTrash 14 points ago +14 / -0

Kathy Barnette stated that she doesn't want to sit next to a gay person on an airplane.

Based.

6
InTheArmsOfThePepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Note that she didn't say she would not, only that she prefers to sit next to a hetero.

I usually love me some Grenell, but he's flaming a bit too brightly on this one... Kathy is allowed to hold and express her opinions.

1
Wagingliberty 1 point ago +2 / -1

And if she said she didn't want to sit next to white people reeeeeeeee. Inconsistency seems to be how you idpol fuckers thrive.

2
txdrew 2 points ago +2 / -0

She said it on FB in 2013. It was 10 years ago but it is real.

2
Organist1022 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just saw a portion of an incomplete FB post from 2013. The real meaning of the post is not apparent because it's cut off mid sentence. Do you have the complete post?

I guess Trump isn't worried about Oz's views. 🙄

0
txdrew 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry, don’t have the full post.

Oz’s views make him more likable to the center and the left. Lots of dem suburban moms will vote for him because he’s a trusted figure they’ve been watching on TV for decades, add those with Trump’s endorsement and he doesn’t even have to try in this race.

I don’t support Oz, but I can see the game being played

2
Oz_watch 2 points ago +2 / -0

and he doesn’t even have to try in this race.

.. and he hasn't been trying, which is why he is losing.

37
TheSphinxIsAFag 37 points ago +37 / -0

WRONG!

Oz is a fucking rino snake clear as day. How many others was trump wrong about? How many of his appointments stab him in the back or fall flat?

30
BadgerStDeplorables 30 points ago +30 / -0

Does anyone know why he thinks Dr. Oz is "the only one"?

28
TheSphinxIsAFag 28 points ago +28 / -0

Misguided loyalty for some reason.

4
Sumarongi 4 points ago +6 / -2

Is it hard to read his own words? He thinks Oz is can win and Barnette can not. Whether that’s true or not is debatable, but I assume he has some metrics.

Oz might be a RINO but he is not Mitt Romney. Mitt’s enmity forward Trump is deeply personal, and I don’t think that is an issue with Oz.

I suspect right now, for Trump, he places loyalty higher than ideology, considering how many times he got stabbed in the back. As much as Oz is sketchy ideologically, I’ve never heard him badmouth Trump

1
Zepp87 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's specifically said he polls well with women, that they love him.

He thinks he has the best shot to win.

3
BostonVoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's fucking ridiculous. No idea

3
SwitchbladeDrone 3 points ago +5 / -2

I'd guess that the math looks like: low info voters + name recognition = Win!! That was Trump's winning formula. Once he's there, Oz will be a proxy for Trump. Trump will own Oz. And Oz will carry his water. Everyone (including Trump and Oz) know that Oz is a cringing soyboy who doesn't have the balls or political smarts to stand up to Trump.

Now is not the time to doubt Trump.

2
BadgerStDeplorables 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not doubting, just haven’t heard him give any explanation, and Oz is clearly a lefty.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

And Oz will carry his water.

No one is beholden to anyone once they've been elected. They can do anything they want without any danger of being fired or replaced for years.

Just look at all the deep staters Trump picked that did whatever the hell they wanted.

2
SwitchbladeDrone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oz is a weak cuck. He'll never withstand the pressure of bucking Trump. Nor will he ever be re-elected without Trump's blessing.

-19
deleted -19 points ago +2 / -21
2
BadgerStDeplorables 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blow me handshake

27
DefenderDad 27 points ago +27 / -0

Trump might have no faith in her, but we do. We are signing up to be election judges, poll watchers. We will campaign for her.

Why? Because we need to get out on the ground to shutdown this massive fraud that will still go on in PA.

Why will this work? You won PA twice. We can elect MAGA in PA.

11
PaigeAshley 11 points ago +12 / -1

Well said

25
invalid_data 25 points ago +25 / -0

Somebody who has Truth respond and say "Sooo Oz's past as a conservative is clean? Bull-Fing-Shit."

2
ironhansed 2 points ago +3 / -1

"he explained himself to trump"... lmao thats what the tweet implies

24
Jack_HinsonTN 24 points ago +27 / -3

A crazed, lunatic Democrat is the only choice to defeat crazed lunatic Democrats? What the actual fuck Donald. I refuse to believe he's that stupid, this stinks of Kushner. Oz is, according to his own editorials: Anti-2A, Anti-1A, Anti-4A, pro-abortion, pro-transgender surgery & drugs for minors, pro-open borders, and pro-globalism! That's all from his own writings and easy to look up, not even from interviews. If it walks like a Democrat leftist, talks like a Democrat leftist, acts like a Democrat leftist... it's a fucking Democrat leftist.

6
Thelongrun 6 points ago +9 / -3

🎯 💯

3
amopheldupsidedown 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want a crazed, lunatic Republican that just sets fire to everything in DC. I don't know that she fills that role, but I have hope some hopium left over

But also I don't vote in PA anyway

0
MAGA1775 0 points ago +2 / -2

If this is Kushner, at some point, Trump needs to take responsibility. He's a man. When is he going to stand up and say we will absolutely not support these leftist/Democrat/WEF-controlled/globalists?

Dr. Oz is so bad that he may even make Romney look like a patriot.

23
GeorgeFentanylFloyd 23 points ago +23 / -0

He’s wrong

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
11
throwaway777 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hannity is establishment, anyone he supports is an establishment candidate, establishments candidates represent the establishment, not the people.

4
Beardicus 4 points ago +4 / -0

That alone is enough for me to support her.

3
Oz_watch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck Hannity.

10
BeefyBelisarius 10 points ago +10 / -0

PA is fucked, yes

7
OriginalPrimitive 7 points ago +7 / -0

i know, right?

21
deleted 21 points ago +24 / -3
10
4DHopscotch 10 points ago +12 / -2

DeSantis.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
TheNightJanitor 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yaaaaaaaas

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
2
TheNightJanitor 2 points ago +3 / -1

Anaconda? That you?

-16
MaltipooSaysWoof -16 points ago +4 / -20

fuck off faggot. barnette wanted a statue of barry obongo.

'will not be voting for trump'....go back to reddit, leftist shill.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
-12
MaltipooSaysWoof -12 points ago +3 / -15

love how your only retort is "DA JOOOOOOZ".

barnette wanted a statue of obummer. here is the change.org petition barnette created to make a statue of obummer. she is a leftist who will choke harder than romney in 2012 if allowed to win the nomination.

that is who you're simping for.

4
TheNightJanitor 4 points ago +6 / -2

Look bruh, if you want my comeback, you're going to have to scrape it off your mother's teeth.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
21
TommyLasordasBallBag 21 points ago +21 / -0

The man doesn't change his mind. I get his desire to have more (R) than (D)... but we need the right (R)s. He didn't learn his lesson when Paul Ryan backstabbed him.

19
Siteless_Vagrant 19 points ago +19 / -0

Screw R AND D, we need AMERICANS.

15
EvJohn 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not Turks. Or any other dual citizens.

11
Siteless_Vagrant 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's what I said, Americans. None of this American on paper crap. Good ol' Americans.

19
TheThreeSeashells 19 points ago +19 / -0

Why is this non-MAGA, low-energy, Oz promoting bullshit stickied? I know it's a Trump tweet, but this is one endorsement that will backfire on him and he clearly doesn't have the support from his base on this one. We're not Leftists. We don't just blindly do whatever we're told.

8
txdrew 8 points ago +8 / -0

It does show he is listening to his base though, even if we disagree with his pick, he explained his thought process for us which I appreciate.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fair point. Unfortunately, it's a weak argument by President Trump. He's not really convincing anyone to support Oz since he can't mention one single thing that would make him a good Senator. He's just making a broad claim that he thinks Oz is the only one that can win in the general election. If anything, he actually makes a stronger case for Barnette. He says that all she has to do is answer some questions and she might turn out to be a better pick. Oz has already been exposed as a shit candidate. There's no wiggle room left. I think President Trump is only basing this decision on Oz's "celebrity" status. Like I said...it's weak.

5
txdrew 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t disagree with anything you said

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

He explained it a long time ago and people told him he's full of shit. Explaining it again doesn't make it less bullshit.

18
Shadowmanstan 18 points ago +19 / -1

Oz… J&J at rally… Trump making some pretty odd choices as of late.

1
Cablespider 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's weaning the cultists off the teat. The tough love phase. He wants you to look the other way. Oblige him so he can rest in peace. He served his purpose.

18
Malfunction 18 points ago +18 / -0

A vote for carpetbagging jersey boy, Dr. Oprah is a vote for Fetterman! At least fetterman is gonna stab me in the face whereas Dr. Oprah is gonna stab me in the back.

17
Foletado 17 points ago +17 / -0

Polling truth: PA GOP USA Senate

Barnette has the same number of supporters as Oz.
She can win.

17
fdumont 17 points ago +18 / -1

Even MAGA king can be wrong sometimes. He is wrong in endorsing Oz.

BARNETTE ALL THE WAY.

16
Siteless_Vagrant 16 points ago +16 / -0

Oz IS a crazed lunatic democrat.

16
Ricky_CIA 16 points ago +16 / -0

Oz is a leftist commie faggot who supports abortion, promoted trannies on his show and wants to restrict the Second Amendment.

Fuck Oz.

15
Cayde_Wants_To_MAGA 15 points ago +16 / -1

I'm not in PA but I do want to say that I love how we can discuss how Trump is wrong on this one and still stick with our guns against Oz. No matter if he has Trumps misguided endorsement.

For all the PA pedes backing Barnette and choosing to stay with what you consider the right candidate and dont give a fuck about Trump's endorsement: Bravo to you!

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +6 / -3

Very good comment. Thank you.

1
FreddyThePatriot 1 point ago +5 / -4

I am in PA, and I'm not voting for either of them.

if the republicans want to not present any candidate worth a shit at all, I'm not going to do shit for them

4
Cayde_Wants_To_MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is perfectly your right!

I'm just glad we all aren't blindly following someone who says Vote for X cause I say so! All other people suck!

15
Sea_Still 15 points ago +17 / -2

Vote for the lesser of two evils yet again

14
AmericaFirstPepe 14 points ago +14 / -0

Fuck Oz 100%

There were a ton of people who are hardcore MAGA now that doubted Trump in 2016. Almost everyone in the GOP doubted him back then.

Seeing the vicious campaign going after this based candidate just makes me want to support her even more, especially since Hannity apparently “called in a solid” to get Trump to endorse Dr. Baby Killer Trans the Kids.

12
Patriotsheep 12 points ago +12 / -0

I’m sure the tweet about Islam has a lot to do with this. There must be some other things we don’t know that has him keeping a distance.

With that said, you know Barnette isn’t going to backstab you and will always be 💯 true to her beliefs. I’d rather have a real person like her than a fake in OZ. Vote for Barnette pedes. We aren’t a cult like the left is and can see who is the real representative of the people VS the lizard man puppet.

5
Thelongrun 5 points ago +8 / -3

Well said. 💯

12
Madcracka 12 points ago +12 / -0

F*** Dr Oz I'm voting for Kathy, and I'm not taking your vaccination!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
AnacronicA 11 points ago +12 / -1

Not a full 180 to endorsing Barnette over Oz but it's good sign

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
stagolee 11 points ago +11 / -0

As if Oz doesn't have retarded things in his past. He's a fucking quack TV doctor who has endorsed any number of whacko ideas.

11
SpezIsANazisCumRag 11 points ago +13 / -2

Okay Trump, what are those things from her past that is a red flag for you? It sounds like you've done your research into her but aren't will to share it with the rest of us. Your endorsement of Oz is not a good enough of a reason for me or anyone else to throw our support behind a known RINO over someone who has yet to give us a reason to not support her.

6
txdrew 6 points ago +6 / -0

Grenell was posting them on his Twitter yesterday. Basically anti gay and anti Islam. Not that that’s a bad thing, he just thinks a lot of people won’t vote for her because of it.

4
SpezIsANazisCumRag 4 points ago +6 / -2

Basically anti gay and anti Islam.

Well not only do I definitely want to vote for her but I also want to marry her.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of black people are anti-gay. It be like that.

2
Wagingliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because most Americans aren't rabid theocrats. Kathy Barnette is still the best candidate even if she has a few views that are hot garbage.

2
Thelongrun 2 points ago +5 / -3

💯

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
10
PelosiStock 10 points ago +10 / -0

GET IT TOGETHER TRUMP! LISTEN TO US

8
__I_dindu__nufin_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, I'm sure he has his reasons for this message. Ozzy seems like a TV cuck though.