2684
Comments (225)
sorted by:
149
TommyJarvis 149 points ago +149 / -0

And people here have been saying this for YEARS.

97
-c-i-a- 97 points ago +98 / -1

Limbaugh talked about it on a regular basis. I can't remember the exact details but he had some sort of legal dispute with them and he and his team were able to suss out that Twitter is full of bots and the overall expressed sentiment on the platform is fake and gay.

70
Skogin 70 points ago +70 / -0

Rush got swarmed in an attempted cancelation of his advertisers - his investigators traced it all back to a small number of people sock puppetting hundreds of twitter accounts.

5
imnotdeadyet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, it was like 6 people doing this.

38
IamDevo 38 points ago +38 / -0

Dont forget about the fake and manipulated trends.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
14
War_Hamster 14 points ago +14 / -0

Something about this is off to me.

Elon does not own the company yet, and the market is betting that the deal doesn't go through.

So why make sweeping changes prior to a change of ownership that may not even go through?

Something smells fishy.

14
rapsheet1mile 14 points ago +14 / -0

Maybe it's the possibility of exposure. They are trying to clean house as much as possible "in case the landlord looks in," so to speak.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, that's one of the possibilities I considered. It's all very odd.

9
TruthyBrat 9 points ago +9 / -0

Shareholder and advertiser lawsuits = "the landlord"

2
TakeEmDownDJT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's my guess too

3
Standingoak 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like a Lawyer , never ask a question you don't already have the answer to.

What committee did Devin Nunes sit on prior to present job?

Do you get more publicity from a successful take over of from a failed one?

Which costs less money ?

Rinse , Repeat ?

Why is Elon so helpful ? Working for a living ?

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand what you're getting at, but the fact that Twitter's market cap is 50x that of DWAC has always made me think this is not in play.

2
Standingoak 2 points ago +2 / -0

The battle is for the Narrative , your talking about the spoils of war. I'm talking about the tools of War.

How much FRAUD would be required before SEC would have to get involved?

How much debt Fraud has been floated on this earnings Fraud?

Which Foreign entities are involved ? Are they same ones involved in the ZuckerBUCKS ?

3
-c-i-a- 3 points ago +4 / -1

Remember that Dorsey is still heavily involved behind the scenes of this shit. He has Elon's ear.

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

I had not heard this. Seemed to me that @Jack was acting like a jilted lover.

I don't trust any of them.

4
-c-i-a- 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
GainesvilleFlorida 3 points ago +3 / -0

I surmise, for those of us not in the trade or industry or upper echelon of inner circles, that Elon not being a patriot and conservative is why our spider sense is tingling.

But looking back from this point, it seems more like checkers than chess. If I wanted a platform to bolster my product/agenda, removing bots I can’t control would be necessary. So offer to buy company for way more than it’s worth, knowing the fiduciary weight it will leverage in the decision. Know discovery during purchase contract writing will open up “problems”. Put offer on hold due to value (evaluation?) problem.

Something like that. I don’t think I’m saying it quite right.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am in the industry, and I've rarely seen an arbitrage spread between the offer price and market price this large.

That tells us that you may be on the right track. There are big bets that the deal either doesn't close, or that it closes at a much lower price.

2
imnotdeadyet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hiding the evidence. They need to try and clean up the really bad shit before his people get in there. It will be bad, but a lot of the really bad shit will be "deep sixed" before he gets in there.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were supposed to have frozen the code, but we'll see.

3
imnotdeadyet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, the code is frozen, but the databases are not. That is how they got so many people that had been banned, access to Twitter. The data contains the identifiers for different actions like "Banned" or In a "Timeout" for a week. I think the big issue is going to be the fake accounts. You heard about all the lefties that all of a sudden lost followers? They were all fake accounts. A lot of Conservatives got more followers (they had suppressed the number of followers for them). Influencers have been paying for followers for years. The more followers they have, the more they can charge for liking a product. Some offshore folks create bots to create the users and then follow the Influencers. We are going to find out that 30% to 35% of the people in Twitter are fake accounts. It may even be more.

4
schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everybody was in on it.

21
snoopy3210 21 points ago +21 / -0

Don’t forget about Hillary’s tech camps, which trained foreign activists to use twitter to foment violent riots and remove presidents that she didn’t like (Trump in 2017, Yanukovich in 2014, Bachar al Assad in 2011). Research Hillary’s tech camps. Her close advisor at the state department bragged about Hillary being able to go around diplomacy and use the youth to revolt. (Hillary had no talent at dealing with foreign diplomats and leaders)

5
-c-i-a- 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is also where Signal came from.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
3
labiator 3 points ago +3 / -0

From behind amirite?

2
ThisIsHowItStarts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eeewww. Could you imagine the smell. We’ve already been reports that she smells like sulfur

6
Dictator_Bob 6 points ago +6 / -0

Marketing agencies have known about this since like 2009. They helped contribute to the problem. Robots talking to robots.

6
FliesTheFlag 6 points ago +6 / -0

Robots clickity clicking on Google Ads making Google billions.

4
FinishTheBorderWall 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. They can even talk to each other now! It’s very creepy. All to drive ad revenue through false pretenses.

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not just that. Since 2018 the first two tweets under any Trump tweet were bots. These fake conversations were used to temper down his « rethoric » which is a total garbage excuse. Trump was only telling the truth and they found that « provocative ».

2
Gonzotron5000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also Elon has been very outspoken about the danger of AI and a need to regulate it as a dangerous thing.

38
T_DforTrump2020 38 points ago +38 / -0

And way back on Reddit too. Lots of bots/fake accounts with nothing in them. They had to do that to make up for the fudged user numbers on Conservative subs. No way did TD only have 700k subscribers.

29
Snooptwo 29 points ago +29 / -0

Remember when they accidentally opened the shades and we saw we had millions of subs?

21
IamDevo 21 points ago +21 / -0

remember when they had to silence our impact and spread by "changing the algorithm"? Fucking losers.

16
Racerx719 16 points ago +16 / -0

And theeeeen we got banned

8
Hunterscrackbaby 8 points ago +8 / -0

I remember when they changed the entire way stickies performed in /all because of us. Funniest shit ever. Mods would strategically sticky and unsticky posts to slingshot them into the front page.

Something any other sub could have done, but just because of TDS they had to make sweeping changes to their platform. Mods are master trolls.

5
viking65 5 points ago +5 / -0

I saved this comment (now deleted on the old .win site):
Lol at 155 new subscribers. How they tried to completely halt all numbers.

Remember when the front page algorithm broke and we spammed the front three pages with Donald's face and STILL YOUR PRESIDENT captions 🤣🤣

What losers. They had to

Implement new site wide rules

develop new front page algorithms

Change so stickied posts can't hit front page

Develop an algorithm to pad the numbers of active users online (remember when it was something crazy like 80,000?)

Pad the subscriber count. Was only 400k? But that one day the advertising sub count proved we were at like 6 million!

Halt new subscriber count from adding to the total. Went from thousands of new subs a day to like 3 every few days

make a "Popular" tab as to better regulate what is shown to users

quarantine us under "cop hating pretenses" (which is hilariously backwards)

Make a series of Reddit official announcements and thread talks about what they're doing to combat "hate speech" aka salve whiney redeitors complaining about TD being active

ban users

shadow ban users

Harass users in DMs

dox users

make 100 different BlueWave/EnoughTrumpSpam/TrumpTweetsTrump/ConservativesForBlue fake subreddit a where they have one 10.5k upvoted post to hit the front page with anti-trump news

Kill any AsKReddit thread that had positive Pro-Trump posts

Warn users for upvoting the wrong posts (seriously)

Instantly ban anyone who posted in TD from posting in other subs

Spam BlackPeopleTwitter with anti-Trump posts, and delete all anti-Clinton/Biden/Harris posts (saw it with my own eyes)

Astroturf the entire site with propaganda

Edit users posts through the Reddit backend database, so the users posts doesn't show the "edited" asterisk. Reddit admits admitted to this, saying it was "just a joke" to blow off steam

Ban an entire sub

This is all from memory, I'm 100% sure there's more, but look how they try to demoralize us.

You can't demoralize 250+ years of red blooded patriotism. We are the Sons and Daughters of Liberty, posting memes and shattering leftie dreams.

Get some, nerds.

4
Youobeynow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pepe-ridge farm remembers

7
JimBobWalters 7 points ago +7 / -0

Twitter and Reddit worked together on their GPT2 bot linguistics. You could search comments verbatim and find them across many sub reddits and Tweets. They eventually changed the search algorithm, essentially blocking the function.

This place has the same bot problem Reddit had but it's worse because they allow users to create endless accounts and they are compatible with the open box session extension in Chrome.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
labiator 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not a website for normies I'll have you know.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
rapsheet1mile 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get where you're coming from, but I'm just not sure that we want them all here. It's kinda like a "liberals leaving California and bringing their politics with them" sort of situation.

That said, the bot/shill situation really sucks, and it's exacerbated by the fact that mods aren't as strict as they once were. I got banned over a year ago expressing the opinion that Trump might lose my support if he handed the country to Biden. That bothered me at first but at the end of the day it is their site and their rules to enforce. Now people straight talk shit about the man and/or his supporters, go on openly anti-Semitic rants, etc. And get to keep their accounts.

1
JimBobWalters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Require more information and validation. Some ban VPNs as well.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
JimBobWalters 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are various flavors of social media. Anonymous boards like this and Reddit are for people who want to stay anonymous. Quality of information is low and lots of stealth marketing happens...its used to create illusions and make unpopular opinions seem popular. Twitter was so big that politicians were using it to base their decisions off sentiment and most of their users were A.I. cheerleaders. People are tired of propaganda and fake accounts. They want higher quality info and a place FOR THE PEOPLE and not some platform devoted to globalist bots and Democrat commie propaganda. If you don't understand this method or do not like it then Truth Social is not for you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
permissible_missile 2 points ago +2 / -0

the whole point of VPN, which is to be able to post anonymously without fear reprisal from your government

Honestly whoever sold you that was selling you a load of BS. A VPN alone is not enough for you to be secure against a government/infinite resource adversary

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
labiator 2 points ago +2 / -0

This bot's perfectly content with its one account. Bleep boop.

2
Wien1938 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same is true of the knitting site Ravalry. Suspiciously regular additions of new users with generic names, no avatars and no activity. Almost like they were generated by a script.

14
Farage_massage 14 points ago +14 / -0

I think this was the whole point of Elon’s “hostile” offer.

If they lied about the firm, that could an SEC issue. No longer a left vs right thing - it’s a “millions of investors from across the political spectrum class action lawsuit” type deal.

1
Duster_340 1 point ago +2 / -1

What's makes you think that anyone would do anything about it? They still haven't found the Supreme Court leaker.

2
FliesTheFlag 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nothing will happen, SEC is in on all the shinanigans that go on. Fund xyz makes billions of some fuckery and pays maybe a 100Million dollar fine slap on the wrist, and they just go and do it again. Its all one big scam, SEC is a fuckin joke like every other 3 letter gov agency.

1
Farage_massage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because this isn’t partisan. This is toying with the hedge funds. They don’t fuck around

1
jomten 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah people with money/power are the ones who don't get fucked with. Which is why we need to get rich and powerful.

2
CommieCucker 2 points ago +3 / -1

"WHO COULD HAVE PREDICTED THIS"

2
TrumpsBigBalls 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's so easy to see now that they've cleaned it up too...yesterday all the top posts under Biden were by many of our own REAL frens!

0
CommieCucker 0 points ago +1 / -1

They thought it was gonna be easy....it ain't.

2
bobobob 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how they manufacture consent from the public. They give them the false impression that the views on Twitter represent the views of the general public.

59
Hanging_Chad 59 points ago +59 / -0

Everyone has always known that Twitter bots are a problem

20
AlphaOverBetaReturns 20 points ago +20 / -0

Is it any surprise that the army of NPCs was fortified mostly with bots?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
IHeartMyDoggy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, but since it was a public company, it seems like there would be serious problems if the company was fudging the # of users when they had their earnings reports. That helped drive the stock price up and made more money for the company and the board. That seems like a criminal offense.

6
Hanging_Chad 6 points ago +6 / -0

That seems like a criminal offense.

Yeah, but how much did Twitter donate to the party in charge of the SEC?

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

98% of donations from employees went to such party...

1
CommieCucker 1 point ago +2 / -1

before they replace human labor with robot labor, they must replace human rhetoric with robot rhetoric

2
Hanging_Chad 2 points ago +2 / -0

NPC types can not hold regular conversations, relying on robotic rhetoric to function

2
CommieCucker 2 points ago +3 / -1

i have nothing to offer besides a rant -- I. FUCKING. ABHOR. HUMAN. FUCKING. ROBOT. ASS. SHILLS. Cowardice is the fucking WORST of the cardinal sins, and giving up your own fucking free will is pretty goddamn fucking cowardly

free will is what DEFINES YOU, you fucking coward ass idiots

2
Hanging_Chad 2 points ago +2 / -0

I assume you aren't standing with Ukraine, then?

2
CommieCucker 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ukraine is the most BLATANT example of our rulers' corruption, and people are STILL fucking blind. It's so frustrating.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
CommieCucker 0 points ago +1 / -1

please explain to me how Ottoman Oprah Oz is the superior vote

40
neoPede 40 points ago +40 / -0

and it's not the Russians...

8
blah 8 points ago +8 / -0

fuckin Canadians!

3
Rommsey 3 points ago +3 / -0

fuckin’ leaf bud

2
brutustyberius 2 points ago +3 / -1

We should invade.

5
IamDevo 5 points ago +5 / -0

You mean liberate.

1
NinjaPlease 1 point ago +2 / -1

Keep it to the major cities , you come anywhere outside of them , we’ll end you quick

2
FliesTheFlag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those god damn sticky dicked maple tree fuckin faggots from the north!

1
rapsheet1mile 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not even a real country, anyway.

1
CommieCucker 1 point ago +2 / -1

"THIS GUY CAN. NOT. REMAIN. IN PORR!"

"Mr President, are you aware of what you just said?!"

"Of course, Jack! Get me some ice cream! Ultra MAGAa;sldkaggksadg;a"

24
Yet-I-Rise-Covfefe 24 points ago +28 / -4

Twitter ain’t worth 50 billion. It’s not even worth 10 billion. He was never going to buy at that price

7
doug2 7 points ago +10 / -3

Funny that he made an offer at that price then

20
ProphetOfKek 20 points ago +20 / -0

I question if the offer was in good faith or not. Some think it was an elaborate ruse to expose the bot issue. I have no idea.

7
NotMyGovernor 7 points ago +7 / -0

Both

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s my suspicion. Buy something good for a high price or buy a turd for a low price and make it good.

3
spelunking_librator 3 points ago +3 / -0

He saw Twitter with their pants down and he went for it.

2
WisestGuru93 2 points ago +2 / -0

Expose the bot issue of massive scale, put deal on hold, watch stock tank. Renegotiate to buy for 10% of original price.

10
Snooptwo 10 points ago +10 / -0

Contingent on their claim of “less than 5%.” Im not a lawyer and don’t know shit about business deals, but Im pretty sure there are laws on the books that you can rescind your offer if you find out much of the company your buying’s main source of value is fake.

3
I_trigger_faggots 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not just recind the offer but lead the shareholder lawsuit, sue the company into bankruptcy, and pick it up at auction for nothing.

6
BarronVonSaltzburg26 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can make an offer to buy any company and it isn't binding pending due diligence.

4
MAG_n_KAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

He made them an offer they literally could not refuse, because the shareholders would sue. So they sell, opening themselves to be exposed.

Maybe this all happened organically, or maybe this was a big dick 4d chess move all along.

3
QLARP 3 points ago +4 / -1

He has then just where he wants then. First make a final offer of 50 billion with 1 billion penalty fee if you back out.

Then crowd source the due diligence period after agreeing. Then tweet its on hold and tank the share price.

He is the real-life Tony Stark.

22
-jjjjjjjjjj- 22 points ago +23 / -1

Its only a problem for someone wanting to buy Twitter and run it as an honest business. Twitter is a CIA spying/propaganda platform and the bots are a core part of the design. If Musk didn't know that before trying to buy it he's retarded.

17
Snooptwo 17 points ago +17 / -0

Lol he probably did. He knew they had said they have less than 5% bots. Offer a crazy amount. Force them to sell because it would make all the shareholders money to, and lose money if they didn’t. Prove their “less than 5%” claim is the obvious lie it is, then buy at a discount. This would mean they are lying to their shareholders about the value of the company. Pretty sure that’s illegal. And all the other platforms will have to quickly clean up because this will cause some issues in SV.

Looking back, no way the riches guy in the world didn’t know what he was doing. I’d bet the board didn’t want to sell for this specific reason, among other shady shit they didn’t want exposed.

6
VirPopulus 6 points ago +6 / -0

He definitely knew that before going in. This is the best time to bring it up the bot issue now that all eyes are on Musk.

1
Keep_on_winning_kag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey! You're not supposed to call African Americans retarded, that's the liberals job!

-1
Spicemustfiow -1 points ago +2 / -3

He did know.

That’s why it’s obvious that this is an excuse because his bank loans with TSLA collateral already hit their limits.

21
LibertyPrimeWasRight 21 points ago +22 / -1

Anyone could make that prediction.

19
MythArcana 19 points ago +19 / -0

It also has a democrat problem, but same thing...

18
immortal 18 points ago +18 / -0

Somebody finally decided to fuck the big tech. Dummies know no restraint and started grabbing too much power. Welcome our big tech slayers overlords. This gives the economy a chance to readjust from constant blabbering nonsense of HR departments who are worse than former visionaries. Tanking the economy for a year or two is a small price to pay.

11
Snooptwo 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don’t think Musk is MAGA, I think he is more of a business obsessed autist. I think he is probably as for free speech as we are, but certainly left of us on other issues. At this point, free speech absolutists are ok in my book. They at least will allow us to criticize the powerful.

3
immortal 3 points ago +3 / -0

He is a technocrat and probably can not stand mediocrity so prominently flaunted by the lefties.

1
BarronVonSaltzburg26 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good analysis on Musk

16
awsure 16 points ago +16 / -0

Delicious that Elon’s bid ripped off the veil. This stock is going to be destroyed when they release the numbers. Shorting it hard

2
JoinTheDiscussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

He still owns that 10%

1
Skogin 1 point ago +1 / -0

All the more bold and cunning.

9
GuerillaYourDreams 9 points ago +9 / -0

Anyone spending any time on Twitter knows that bots rule their site.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
Tripin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Elon isn't stupid rofl, he knows. He's probably just doing all this shit to shine a light on everything even the normies can't ignore.

6
IHaveEvidence 6 points ago +8 / -2

What if? Musk is actually working for MAGA? And the entire point of the purchase was to expose Twitter? Ya think the guy that plopped $44 billion on the table did not know about Barry Obama's 300,000 fake followers?

5
KINGOJ007 5 points ago +6 / -1

Bannon has been saying from the start this deal wasn’t going through

6
ProphetOfKek 6 points ago +9 / -3

Bannon says a lot of things.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +4 / -3

My point is that he is a professional speculator not a prophet.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
-3
ProphetOfKek -3 points ago +2 / -5

Sorry I hurt your fee fees.

5
thisisatestof2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m going to bed at least 25% of their users are bots. We have seen numerous times where they basically repeat Word for Word the exact same thing over and over, and that was just a cursory glance/search.

Never mind the ones that are just there to “like” or retweet the approved tweets.

5
goldengirl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Little slow on the uptake, there, Devin, we've known that for literally YEARS. Elon himself has about 12 million bot followers last I looked.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
1
Prayfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

What shift

4
StrongIsland 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reddit, Facebook and YouTube next, no more China influence and censorship... soory tic-tac-toe you gotta go too! Media VIRUS.

3
GainesvilleFlorida 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is crazy but, the issue with China is not being able to critique the government. Their stance on LGBT is actually good. Just flat out banning that content.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good for him. He's only about 6 years behind the rest of us.

3
magaspif 3 points ago +3 / -0

and now finally someone is in a position to be able to prove it to everyone. brilliant

3
healthy1 3 points ago +3 / -0

How did he know for sure? We all assumed it but how did he know?

2
Snooptwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

He probably has a few resources we don’t…

3
youraverageoutlier 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now do reddit

3
notCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

This definitely isn't catching Elon by surprise is all I can say. He's harped on this from the get go.

3
MAG_n_KAG 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Elon knew this beforehand, and it was Jack Dorsey that told him, then I would have to say that Jack just became a little less of a faggot. A big redeeming move, but still a long way to go.

4
JoinTheDiscussion 4 points ago +4 / -0

No Jack is only trying to save face

3
ckover9000 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's next, someone figured out the democrats have a commie problem?

3
Account25 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like Twitter was committing some serious fraud.

3
Crownius 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember seeing an ad somewhere online where people could buy Twitter followers by the thousands for a couple hundred dollars.

3
Washingpede 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm betting around 45-50% bots.

3
bricemartin67 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bannon called it from day one of the offer.

2
luapsel 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will be great when they find out that Twatter themselves makes the bots for their overloards agendas.

2
WisestGuru93 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon: Expose the bot issue of massive scale, put deal on hold, watch stock tank. Renegotiate to buy for 10% of original price.

2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon is going to buy twitter, and he knew about the bot problem way before this.

He's squeezing them for a better price.

2
irongeek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jack Dorsey knew about it for a long time but got fired (was forced to step down). I think he's secretly helping Elon Musk to expose the fraud.

P.S. DORSEY IS A FAGGGOT

2
SpicyAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon understands the predictably of free speech enemies.

2
Keep_on_winning_kag 2 points ago +2 / -0

He has only scratched the surface.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
obamagavemeaphone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon, like Gates, wants everyone to be chipped. Never forget that! He's not OUR guy.

2
FitOfficial 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, I too have been on Twitter and have a functioning IQ of above 40 at times.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BelfordBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait till they see them it’s 30% or better..😂😂😂

2
RusherOfDin 2 points ago +2 / -0

10 Print "There is no bot problem."

20 Print "^ I agree with this guy."

30 Print "^This."

40 Print "We've been trying to contact you about your car's warranty."

2
knnbccb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps Elon Musk's duty is to destroy Twitter, not acquire it.

First Twitter, then Facebook (Meta).

All according to prophecy.

1
highenergywinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hope so

2
NotMyGovernor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nunes Trump and Elon were working together since the beginning. Nunes has already admitted this.

2
ThisIsHowItStarts 2 points ago +2 / -0

It just looks like there’s some type of discovery that happens when you buy a business for $44 billion. LULZ!

1
AngryAsian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, anybody who has ever worked in digital marketing knows this. The issue is that ad morons get hired into corporate digital marketing positions and they're incentivized to ignore the bot problem because their whole premise is spend money to access millions of real life "users" for engagement.

1
Red-88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya gotta ask yourself if you're being manipulated...

1
T_DforTrump2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's funny what happens when a "company" is looking to place ads places.

1
conservativefrank 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gee, almost as if this whole thing was done to get Truth Social out of the news.

1
Slothboy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, it was never in the news anywhere but here

1
ExileOnRedditStreet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Far worse than Reddit....and that's saying something. Everyone knows you can buy followers on Twitter.