Comments (216)
sorted by:
-f-b-i- [M] 74 points ago +74 / -0 stickied
NotAGlowy 202 points ago +203 / -1

I got to cancel my trans surgery

UndercoverCentipede 94 points ago +95 / -1

I just had mine on Friday, how do I undo it?

deleted 116 points ago +117 / -1
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
HockeyMom4Trump 8 points ago +10 / -2

You guys! Always coming through with the good ones!

DemsH8America 15 points ago +16 / -1

Wood glue works best.

Froynlavenfroynlaven 2 points ago +4 / -2

Huh huh huh. You said wood. Huh huh huh

InarosPrime 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then it will smell like poop and hotdogs.

Salt_n_Pepe 3 points ago +4 / -1

And to redo it, buy a big tilapia fillet (skin on).

HerbertBailBondsh 3 points ago +3 / -0

After a week the smell would be the same and it would attract just as many flies.

LawlAndDisorder 36 points ago +36 / -0

It's totally reversable! No permanent damage whatsoever!

OneBigMaga 24 points ago +24 / -0

Super easy, barely an inconvenience.

jpower 5 points ago +6 / -1

You'll even get a free cremation if you don't make it.

JakefromVegas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Obscure YouTube references are tight.

grad16uc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh really?

Gnat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny guy. I was subscribed to his channel, but he made some rude Trump statements in one or two of his videos and I unsubbed. I mean.. I get that crap from everywhere else, I just thought it would be nice for it to not invade that channel too. If he (sorry, can't remember his name) ever does any videos where he equally makes fun of the pudding-brained Biden I would consider resubscribing.

Cetera 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's [the current year] and he makes his living creating funny youtube videos. Anyone in that situation would be a stone-cold retard to insult ANYTHING left of Ronald Reagan.

You wouldn't go in and tell your boss that his mother's a whore or that his wife and kids are ugly, even if it were true, and even if you said the same thing about a co-worker last night.

Picking a fight you can't win, but can only take damage from, is the sign of a mental midget. Granted, I'm sure Ryan George is a lefty. But even if he weren't, you wouldn't be able to tell.

Smarmcastic 28 points ago +28 / -0

Adadictomy. (I knew that joke would work again at some point.)

TommyJarvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Isn't that what Ellen Paige had?

Yawnz13 2 points ago +3 / -1

Probably just cut off her hair.

cosmos411 4 points ago +4 / -0

No worries. Just identify as a male and use the pronouns "he/him".

kaczan3 16 points ago +16 / -0

Actually, to take advantage of laws like that all you need to do is get your driver's license to say "F". And if anyone asks, you're a "masculine-presenting transgender lesbian" (so you're still dating chicks). I've heard stories of men doing this, telling their boss, and getting a promotion the very same day because companies need to promote women.

DontArkancideMeBro 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reading your comment, all I can do is Honk Honk and pray for God to send us a gigantic Comet at 200,000 mph.

Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not gigantic enough to wipe out the Based, I hope. How about just a few fragments, to fall on San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and DC?

BidensButtWiper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah fuck it, let's all meet God and he can sort it out.

MexicanBeerFlu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Watching the Eternals I found myself rooting for the end of the world to come. This shit has gone too far.

Kricket 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one gets the reference because you’re the only one who watched the eternals

MexicanBeerFlu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish I hadn't.

robob2700 1 point ago +1 / -0

I sure as fuck didnt

RStroud 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can put down whatever sex and race you want. There is no objective legal test, so put down what is most advantageous to you. Keep documentation, record interactions,if they have a problem sue them for discrimination. Clown world absolutely hates it when you honk back.

kaczan3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, you can't out-smart them, but you can out-crazy them :D

Just_wanted_darkmode 10 points ago +10 / -0

You dont even need to do all that, just say you identify as a chick, winning.

JoeBidensDementia1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll take your place.

davidwilcox 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got mine right away, but then they brought in this trans guy from India and gave the job to him. Long story short, I feel betrayed by the system. :(

NotAGlowy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Minority Woman > Woman

You got replaced just like the whitehouse press secretary

CAPTAIN_TENDY_PLATE2 166 points ago +166 / -0

That's because the very idea of equity is unconstitutional.

These people need to get fuckt. Your feelings do not supersede other peoples rights. Just because you feel like there should be 50% of women on a board room, doesn't mean you get to legislate that, because you're shitting on the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of automatically 50% of the population right off the start.

You're outright denying half the population even a chance at success.

Now, do the same with racial quotas. And everything else related to identity.

Double-Y_Chromo 79 points ago +80 / -1

"Equity" is just another made-up commie term. It basically combines anti-Whitism with misandry and non-white privilege. "You can't punish non-white criminals because equity. You can only hire females because equity. White people need to be genocided because equity." Nowhere on earth, is doing anything in the name of "equity," any kind of legal binding. Furthermore, "equity" is insane, immoral and evil.

immortal 23 points ago +23 / -0

HR enters the chat

invalid_data 6 points ago +6 / -0

the white irrational liberal Karens who run HR's across America enter the chat.

btntx 2 points ago +3 / -1

HR departments are mostly diversity hires.

Spicy_maymay 6 points ago +6 / -0

In my experience they are 90% white women.

nozonozo 16 points ago +16 / -0

Equity is anti-Natural law.

Nature says that men, on a whole, are better than women at leadership positions in the community. Fighting hundreds of millions of DNA evolution is silly and destructive.

If the Senate was 50% women our nation and what it was founded on would be doomed.

DeboonkedFact 6 points ago +6 / -0

To be fair, even though the Senate isn't 50% women, it's made up of enough pussies that it's basically the same thing.

nozonozo 2 points ago +2 / -0

So maybe we are already doomed.

logan34 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the Senate was 50% women our nation and what it was founded on would be doomed.

Because its not already garbage now? I'm sure it would just accelerate us to the end quicker.

TheImpossible1 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it was 51% women, they'd be voting on reducing the male population.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
ForsakenForeskin 17 points ago +17 / -0

Communism, where everyone is equally poor.

VoidWanderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everyone but the elite that pushed for it in the first place.

Hunter77 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not sure the idea of equity is borne out by biology, either.

Strike08 14 points ago +14 / -0

It is socialist garbage.

lefty295 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s not, going by equity, you must cripple yourself if you weren’t born with a disability so that you are equal to someone with one.

TheDTOMDon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who is Harrison Bergeron?

drumdude29 1 point ago +1 / -0

The pursuit of equity is one of the reasons women should not be able to vote.

glow-operator-2-0 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your feelings do not supersede other peoples rights.

Shame. I think all communists should be shot.

Richard_Gere 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can push them right out of a helicopter.

BoatingAccident 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’ve always wanted to be in the NBA!!!

LawlAndDisorder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately, proposed regulations that would require the NBA populate their teams with at least 50% white people will never happen now.

Pepedom 104 points ago +105 / -1

If this is unconstitutional then so is affirmative action

Idontevenknow 55 points ago +55 / -0

Correct, as was/is Obamacare.

ThirteenPercenter 6 points ago +9 / -3

I’m no fan of the ACA but why is it unconstitutional?

Idontevenknow 34 points ago +34 / -0

It's a service that they are requiring to be purchased. They got around this by lying and saying medical care is somehow not a service, ie: someone else's labor.

Richard_Gere 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think they used the commerce clause, in another bit of roe v wade style chop-logic to avoid shooting down Obama's signature piece.

Idontevenknow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes you are correct, sorry I didn't get back to this yesterday, for me. Roberts bastardized the commerce clause to say that healthcare was actually just a tax and not a service, and congress is allowed to pass taxes on, so it was reclassified to be "constitutional". The commerce clause allows congress to pass law that makes it so interstate commerce and commerce between those states and other countries can be smooth. Saying that mandated healthcare is a requirement to facilitate business is flat out retarded, and is how the Obama admin was trying to pass it. Roberts basically got on one side of the case and made him self a cooperative ally, not a judge. I don't think judges get to change what a persons arguments actually are normally in order for a suit to proceed. They would typically tell them the problem with their argument, and boot the case, and wait for the Obama admin to resubmit a new argument if he hadn't decided to just say, "oh your argument is invalid Obama, i'll change your argument, so now it can be seen as sort of valid, and there ya go!"

TravelingSalesman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought they got around it by making health insurance required as a part of your federal income taxes, and they flipped enforcement over to the IRS. IIRC Trump repealed the individual mandate (that may have just been through an executive order) which just left the healthcare government website marketplace. Edit - it was a part of Trump's Tax Cut Cut Cut Cut and Jobs Act.

ThirteenPercenter -12 points ago +3 / -15

Where in the constitution does it say this cannot be done?

Also it’s not required to be purchased, there’s just an additional tax liability if you don’t have qualifying health insurance.

Again, I’m anti-ACA but I don’t see this being unconstitutional. For as long as I can remember, it’s required to have liability insurance to drive a car and that’s not just a tax liability if you don’t comply, it’s actually a law. I personally find that to be a good and reasonable requirement.

Edit: Texas AG arguing ACA is unconstitutional here https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/fifth-circuit-declares-obamacare-mandate-unconstitutional-remands-district-court-determine-if-any

flashersenpai 12 points ago +12 / -0

Also it’s not required to be purchased, there’s just an additional tax liability if you don’t have qualifying health insurance.

You aren't required to pay my friend money. I'll just make you pay me money instead. And if you don't I'll put you in jail.

AVeryNakedMan 5 points ago +6 / -1

Where in the constitution does it say this cannot be done?

You are viewing the Constitution the opposite of how it's supposed to be viewed. Our federal government only has enumerated powers. The Constitution has to explicitly say that the federal government has the power to do something, for it to have the power to do that thing.

schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Show me the exact clause or amendment that makes it Constitutional.

alien123 8 points ago +8 / -0

commerce clause

government cannot force you to buy something

ThirteenPercenter -4 points ago +2 / -6

TIL if the constitution doesn’t say you can do something then it’s not allowed

schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm glad you finally understand the 10th Amendment!

ThirteenPercenter -13 points ago +1 / -14

You’re also required to feed your children if you have any. Is that unconstitutional?

TheDTOMDon 11 points ago +12 / -1

I’m worried you’ve been eating paint again.

ThirteenPercenter -8 points ago +1 / -9

I’m worried the globalists have infiltrated this forum and are sowing division. Only one of us are correct. Bye.

deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
maga_gal 5 points ago +6 / -1

You feeding your child doesn't require the education and labor of another human. You can technically grow your own food.

ThirteenPercenter -2 points ago +1 / -3

LOL that’s not even an analogy

Jemmy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not one of the explicit powers granted to the federal government in the constitution. You could do something like that on a state or local level, but I'd still argue that it's a bad idea.

Most of the current federal government is unconstitutional.

WisestGuru93 2 points ago +2 / -0

As is 97% of the actions taken by the federal government. Most notably, having a private central bank print the currency, lend it to the government and charge interest on all taks payers at once. PS: 2 letters on my keyboard are broken. Thanks Biden!

123breadman 22 points ago +22 / -0

I don't want to be that guy, but Affirmative Action is illegal in California.

It was recently voted on whether it ahould be legal, and Californians voted no.

Unaor2 28 points ago +29 / -1

Californians also voted to pass Proposition 187 in 1994 that would have prohibited illegals from accessing welfare services. A single female jewish judge overruled it. This has led to the state being swarmed by illegals, demographic upheaval, and legal citizens being treated as second-class.

DeplorableCentipede 9 points ago +9 / -0

In 2016, Californians also rejected Proposition 62, thereby keeping the death penalty, and passed Proposition 66 to streamline the death sentencing process. Governor Newsom ignored the propositions and refuses to execute anyone.

logan34 2 points ago +2 / -0

But muh democracy!!!

Froynlavenfroynlaven 0 points ago +1 / -1

To be fair the governor has the power to grant clemency.

DeplorableCentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s not granting clemency. He’s just refusing to sign off on their execution orders.

Froynlavenfroynlaven 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same difference really

123breadman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I'm aware. Democrats flushing money down the drain.

Pepedom 20 points ago +20 / -0

Doesn't stop them from still acting on it

123breadman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct everywhere, except for Big Tech where it's mostly whites, Asians, and Indians.

Basketball_Americanp 2 points ago +2 / -0

bbb.... b...... bb.. based californians?

Unaor2 17 points ago +18 / -1

The entire 1964 civil rights act is abhorrent to the Constitution. Literally obliterated freedom of association.

flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0


deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
MagaMagaChooChoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always has been

Keiichi81 54 points ago +54 / -0

Define "woman", California.

Zskills 23 points ago +23 / -0

That would've been my solution. "Alright boys, half of you are women now".

Problem solved.

TheMemeMagi1776 12 points ago +12 / -0

Men are statistically better at being women anyways

Zskills 14 points ago +14 / -0

Our very first attempt we got woman of the year.

Followed that up with dominating women's sports. 💪💪 girl power!

loverat 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm a woman but I am urging you to please say this to any feminists you happen to engage with because that is fucking hilarious. Take photos of their heads exploding!

BroadSunlitUplands 3 points ago +3 / -0

I vaguely remember looking at this bill a long time ago, and iirc it did explicitly allow for that.

VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was the way boards were going to get around it. Half of them would just "identify" as women and it satisfied the terms.

TommyJarvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

head whipping back and forth


head explodes, body slumps to floor

Simple_Question 4 points ago +4 / -0

No do not ask for a definition.

We HAVE to FORCE one with acceleration.

Women do not exist

Only way to beat a leftist is to hit the gas pedal on their ideas. They cant keep up and they eat themselves after overstepping.

I would really like to see a company start publicly discriminating against women to get this point across. It would ultimately be a stupid business decision but oh boy would it drive the point home politically.

  1. How can you discriminate against something that isn't defined?

  2. How can you discriminate against something that doesn't exist?

rossiFan 18 points ago +18 / -0

No, don't hire that guy who has a family and worked hard for his MBA and is a CPA and has worked his way up through corporations and has the pedigree.... hire HER because SHE has a vagina.

Besides... what is a woman?

just-a-normal-dude 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's FRONT HOLE to you BIGOT.

bidensmissingbrain 12 points ago +13 / -1

Damn. Women leftist feminazi thots are really taking it on the chin lately eh?

VoidWanderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're just thankful it's not getting in their eyes this time.

1984_is_here 9 points ago +9 / -0

Damn! I guess now we'll have to earn it based on merit just like men do. How unfair!!

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
J6Commie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hoes can stay home

Zelenskyscockholster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well yeah

CMDRConanAAnderson 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can you imagine the shitshow that would unfold if companies created a legit "token woman" position on the board just to meet the requirement.

VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some did when this was originally put forward. If the women stuck in it cared they were just there because they had a vagina they cried themselves to sleep in the money the do nothing position they now had handed them just for having the right genitals.

CoupeFL 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good. Now they should all fire the diversity hires

American-Patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Great news. Fuck Cali's politicians

Wolverines556 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now fix me a sandwich, woman

Kiss_The_Ring 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's like requiring men in the kitchen. Total blashphemy.

loverat 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know what's really funny though? The majority of top quality chefs are men. The worst chefs I ever worked with were women - well sort of, the industry is rife with lesbians.

MACHO.MAN.RANDY.SAVA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch racks up another W. Good on them.

climatestatis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haven't seen much about them lately. Good they're still getting things done.

DuesImperator 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is really using his big guns to do some heavy lifting.

Light_HIV_Effect 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now do affirmative action and the racist admissions processes of every college in this country.

Roadpower 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny how Democrats are hell bent to run companies unless the company is doing their bidding like Twitter, Google, Facebook, etc.

rdvs34283 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can take these darn heels off now. Whew.

killerkram 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not a biologist, I do not understand

DonuteaterReturns 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now do race based affirmative action.

AbrahamLincoln 3 points ago +3 / -0

How would they know if they're women anyway, do corporate boards have biologists?

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Tookens 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't care. Literally.

Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. All the CA corps will continue with the policy because of virtue signaling and muh patriarchy.

ubermk3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any law like this is an act of war because it is designed to weaken and destroy our society.

minotaurbeach 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good. It started out asking for a 'qualified' woman -and morphed into any woman that is black. disabled, or trans that can warm the seat.

buildthatwall45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now do diversity hires

learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are a lot of over-sized dresses, womens heels, and spooky looking make-up combos getting dumped in the trash tonight with this news. Wigs are being thrown out and corporate board members are letting their leg and armpit hair grow out again. The "Turn Tranny or Run" law is gone - but why did so many wear drag in the first place?

Granted, that was all at their Eyes Wide Shut Klaus Schwab Epstein Owl worship parties - but still it begs the question.

TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like something only women would come up with.

Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

It took a while, but blatant discrimination against competent males is unconstitutional, even in California.

QueensOwn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crazy that a court ruling was even needed for something so stupid and obviously unconstitutional and in violation of several employment laws. But, here we are.

PaulAtreidesJihad177 2 points ago +2 / -0

Requirements based off anything except merit and qualifications is unconstitutional. They used to tell people don't get face tattoos and radical hair styles of you want to be taken as a professional. The color revolutionaries are encouraging the opposite, they are fomenting division by every pretext they can dream up, from racial equity officers/kommissars to normalizing deviant and a-social behavior. Find a Bible to read and pray for discernment. A lot of churches now are false and will take you straight to hell.

unicornpoop 2 points ago +2 / -0

So no law requiring blacks? CA is so rayciss.

KAGwave 1 point ago +1 / -0


goat_nebula 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Just like a law stating a percentage of men be required on boards would be constitutional.

The amount of bullshit they try to push that doesn’t pass the simple litmus test of, replace them with me and see if it’s fair, boggles my mind. It’s clear who the real ___ists are.

Mean_MAGA_Facka 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution: NO

The woke mob: But muh feelings is hurt!

Dimedog 1 point ago +1 / -0

No shit

RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The state also denied the law was unconstitutional because it was reversing a culture of discrimination that favored men and put in place after failed attempts to rectify the culture."

If a woman was qualified, they would not need to force a company to put them on the board. The fact that we have this in our military now is a sick joke aimed at decreasing unit cohesion. Women have their place, and women who strive to be the best, can achieve every goal a man can in the business world. Forcing women into roles they do not deserve has dire consequences for everyone that is under them.

Allister 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suspect there will be several men that were passed over for a woman because of this law filing lawsuits over their rights being violated!

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Airvh 1 point ago +1 / -0


What if we pulled a page from The Wolf of Wall Street?

Get hot models to lay on the table of the corporate boards during meetings!

OldZilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

Owwwww daddy my pussy hurts!

MagaMagaChooChoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’re just going to keep doing it anyway. Laws are for republicans and white males, after all.

TheSarcasticSlav 1 point ago +1 / -0


knnbccb 1 point ago +1 / -0

The big earthquake can't hit California quickly enough. Long overdue.

They should 'Calexit' when the earthquake hits. You're on your own.

SecedeNOW 1 point ago +1 / -0

I literally laugh out loud now everytime I see one of Faggie-fornias laws getting shot to pieces in the courts.

Godred_Crovan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bigots, why only women, what about the one hundred other genders!

brokentoenail 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter, the boards already did it and we're always playing catch up.

Kekistan_United 1 point ago +1 / -0

everything the leftards stand, is categorically, discrimination.

they think that cus they make it sound 'sciencey' that makes it ok