2398
Comments (282)
sorted by:
188
RedditStillSucks 188 points ago +189 / -1

They believe if they just declare it "beautiful" ...then it automatically becomes it.

103
IHeartMyDoggy 103 points ago +104 / -1

The purpose as a business is to sell magazines. SI swimsuit edition’s target is men. Once again, however, we have a company that ignores their audience in order to promote their woke agenda. No matter how they try, men are not going to pay for a magazine with old or fat women. Men want to see sexy women and women want to see sexy men. I as a female also don’t want to see a fat man on a magazine cover. 🤮

67
Walt_Kowalski 67 points ago +67 / -0

Exactly what I said to my wife. I pretty much said the same thing to her, and she said I was being mean. I said look at me - nobody wants to pay to see a paunchy middle-aged man with gray hair wearing Speedo’s, and I wouldn’t want to pay to see some fat chick on a magazine cover.

44
RealCleanUpPhilly 44 points ago +44 / -0

This is how to fight fire with fire. Time to have speedo Dad bod sports illustrated. It'd be the Jersey Shore all summer. Finally the left would give up.

27
leakmouth 27 points ago +27 / -0

🙋‍♂️ I’m your man

17
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 17 points ago +17 / -0

I’m your huckleberry.

11
Reefay 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm your banana hammock

2
peltast 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm your ham hock.

7
Smarmcastic 7 points ago +7 / -0

They would declare her "trans".

6
Meme_Too 6 points ago +6 / -0

Warning: DO NOT click the link to the Twitter post. What has been seen can not be unseen.

11
Kek_The_World 11 points ago +11 / -0

I agree with you and that made me laugh. My son played waterpolo. The first time I saw him poolside in a Speedo I thought, “ohhhh, you look like a strip of uncooked bacon wrapped in a bandaid.” Since I am a good mom, I didn’t say it out loud. But you are right, I wouldn’t want to see Dwight from the office in a Speedo. Ever.

1
Coolgenner 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s funny as hell. Clever.

6
cpt_majestic2 6 points ago +6 / -0

The only people buying that magazine are her parents.

4
ArchbishopofKekistan 4 points ago +4 / -0

I love that somebody has your username on me. At some point, we all become Walt.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
SlapUp4 16 points ago +16 / -0

Magazines??

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +13 / -2

Fun fact; the founder of Sports Illustrated also founded Time, Life, and Fortune magazines.

Henry Luce was also a member of Skull & Bones.

This is not a coincidence.

His Skull & Bones brothers were behind the financing of the NAZI's. Go look at how many covers Hitler was on in the 1930's.

9
MasksAreChildAbuse 9 points ago +9 / -0

You sure about that?

unfurls fat rolls on table

See anything you like?

flies begin emanating from undisclosed crevices

Im big and beautiful, deal with it bigot 😎

4
Strike08 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not even nurgle would love these rotten garbage bags

5
Equality72521 5 points ago +5 / -0

The media markets are so saturated with crap. These legacy media conglomerates always go in for the fast buck now. They know that this sort of thing will cause a ruckus and that increases their sales (temporarily). As a result, they are destroying their brands. They have all become political organizations. Companies that want to have and build long-term clients don't do this sort of shit.

27
Formerlurker92 27 points ago +28 / -1

A lot of their ideology is like that

I declare the fruit of your labor a human right

I declare this viable child a bundle of cells until birth

19
RedditStillSucks 19 points ago +19 / -0

I declare a man a woman

5
DebunkTheLeft 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm just going to enjoy the fact that his tweet was hilarious.

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

And everyone said, "awoman".

7
Smarmcastic 7 points ago +7 / -0

More moronic than Michael Scott "declaring bankruptcy!"

3
tootthebighorn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or 31 days after. There's still time to murder the child!

3
ThisIsHowItStarts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sticking arms out, fold left arm, fold right arm over left arm - blink eyes! Poof!

I dream of Jeannie!

3
Klown_Schwab 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's out-of-touch academics in their ivory towers.

They've convinced themselves words define reality.

They're so used to winning and forcing others to obey with deceptive framing of issues... they think their words have inherent power, like a magic spell.

They've become like the mad emperor who ordered his soldiers to whip the sea to turn back the tide.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
11
Belleoffreedom 11 points ago +11 / -0

The word you are looking for is laundry. Rich people pay enormous amounts of money for ugly things, as a perverted kind of trophy. It has to be ugly or vapid.

4
Icepck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, the Hunter Biden pieces are so expensive, they must be masterpieces.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
41
ravioli_king 41 points ago +41 / -0

I still remember my wife's friends ridiculing fat models on traditionally skinny girl magazines. Pointing out they "used to get inspired to be the girl on the cover," and "why would I buy a magazine to look like that?" Plenty of them just lost interest in the magazines they had subscriptions to.

25
intris 25 points ago +25 / -0

I agree. I want a supermodel to aspire to be like...not a mediocre diversity hire. What is this, Harrison Bergeron?

31
Walt_Kowalski 31 points ago +31 / -0

You just hit the crux of the matter. They’re trying to tear down role models because they want us to fail. This is a communist tactic. We see through it here, but the average person doesn’t.

8
JohnnyWolverine 8 points ago +8 / -0

You nailed it, fren.

6
ripley88 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's why they attack history

3
TheDigger3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wish I could give additional orange arrows for user name

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Klown_Schwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is this, Harrison Bergeron?

Yes.

If equality is the only goal, it's much easier to lower standards and cut the excellent people down than to raise the subpar people up.

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything is lovely lovely principles, until they bring the shotgun out.

20
mark2398 20 points ago +20 / -0

Reminds me when me and my older brother went to a strip bar on a whim. Half the girls working in the place were fat. My brother looks at me and say, " Lets go....if I wanted to look at nude fat chicks I would have stayed married." lol

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

lmao

38
magaandkag 38 points ago +38 / -0

Careful, she can trap you in her fat rolls and then legally abort you.

8
ThreeTermTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

So many folds.

5
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Odds of anybody finding the moist one are near impossible

10
559throw 10 points ago +10 / -0

Homie they're all moist

3
endofsilence808 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your mom was moist

2
IowanMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was a painful type of funny....

4
ThreeTermTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Always bring flour to the farm.

2
MAGAnic316 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s a YUUUGE bitch!

1
Somefucktard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fat people always complain about not being able to breathe, but they should have an advantage with that many gills.

1
Formerlurker92 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's an image

38
Kek_The_World 38 points ago +38 / -0

I’m a woman. I get we come in different sizes. Hereditary has a lot to do with it. That being said, I find this cover really insulting. No woman wants to be photographed in a bathing suit that gives her droopy breasts and weird straps and bulges everywhere. They could have used a suit with a better fit.

Also, I guess there are women that give up, but most (conservative) women would be ashamed of celebrating unhealthy obesity. It makes me ashamed and it’s not me on that cover. If I was this unhealthy, I would be mortified at the thought of everyone in the grocery checkout seeing me practically buck naked.

And just like they picked Kamala for her sex/skin this woman allowed herself to be displayed practically nude for the express purpose that she is FAT. Mmmmm… building that self esteem right there. Cash the check and buy some ice cream. Literally zero self respect. Zero.

PSA: The girls need to be up front and in their correct place. Ladies, don’t settle for less. Ever. Not in a bathing suit, not in a bra, not in a sports bra, lingerie, or dress. Nipples aimed at the knees are not what anyone needs or wants to see. Even if you’re trim, a bad bra downgrades you from hourglass to rectangle.

God gave them to you. Put them away where they belong. Hope that is not TMI. Little nervous about the feedback on this one. 😬

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
Isolated_Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fat people are healthy!!

Healthy people are dying of covid!!!

It's all connected.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
flashersenpai 6 points ago +6 / -0

I guess there are women that give up

Or often they become secure and lose any incentive to maintain an attractive figure. What can the guy going to do about it anyway?

11
Kek_The_World 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don’t know any women personally who think, I’m on the gravy train so I can just let myself go. Most women who are obese are unhappy with the weight, their marriage and themselves.

You could ask the wife to walk every day after dinner with you. Start small, just around the block and then go from there. So take an interest in your own health and invite her along.

You also might read the book, The Cure for Emotional Unavailability by Stella Smith on both Amazon or Audible. It does a good job of explaining what causes relationships to devolve and that it isn’t just men, women are emotionally unavailable as well. The fat layer may not be security as much as a literal barrier.

2
RallyinStJohnsWood 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue is carbs.

There is so much confusion/misinformation on this subject; here's a sample:

we come in different sizes. Hereditary has a lot to do with it.

Yes, 100% of people have inherited a gene that causes them to become obese if they eat too many carbs. The same gene causes them to get paunchy , zaftig, fluffy, whatever euphemism in proportion to the excess.

Your advice about walking is not bad... walking is good for you. Walking is irrelevant to weight management if a person eats too many carbs.

I have coached three women through major weight loss, plus myself.

Anyone who wants to lose weight: STOP. EATING. CARBS.

I've been 99% meat /fish/ dairy for 4 years. Cured my gout, cholesterol is perfect. The Food Pyramid is homicidal propaganda.

1
Kek_The_World 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can’t argue with you. You are totally right.

4
Equality72521 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's all intentional. The controversy increases sales. Polarizing people works. Everyone wins in the short term. The model will get asked to go on talk shows. The magazine will get a short-term boost in sales. The other media companies will lambast Peterson which, in turn, will increase their viewership. Fat chicks will see it and buy more swimsuits. Social media platforms will get more engagement. Petersons viewership will increase as well. The only loser here is the actual swimsuit that is crying under the stress pushing against it.

1
paperairplane 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they'll talk about it and tweet about it but in this case it won't translate into sales. It's too off-putting. It's visceral. I doubt the model will be on anything other than the View.

1
Equality72521 1 point ago +1 / -0

It won't translate into a lot of sales but they will get a bump. Everyone loves to slow down and look a the car crash. It also puts them in all the other media publications. If you have completely forgotten about S.I. as I did many years ago, now that crap is floating around in my head again - LOL

1
whatafiasco 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that picture was most likely photoshopped to remove the cellulite.

30
here2red 30 points ago +30 / -0

twitter is throwing a shit fit

18
jdog 18 points ago +18 / -0

I saw that. They are going off and it's hilarious because he is right.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
SiggotsMeAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because it's full of fat chicks and soy boys who think that if they pander to women that one day a fat 3/10 might actually touch their pee pee.

30
BobSux 30 points ago +32 / -2

Obesity is objectively unattractive. Nobody wants to fuck somebody who shows objective signs of being unhealthy. It would make no evolutionary sense. Why would I want to have sex with a woman who is less likely to be able to give me children and if she does she can pass her unhealthy genes onto them.

4
Talon54 4 points ago +6 / -2

Hell don't worry about kids. You can bet she's triple vaxxed and boosted so she's sterile.

But besides all that I would never fuck a fat woman. There was a song back in the day, something about, "I don't bump no more with no big fat woman."

3
SomeBloodyMinger 3 points ago +3 / -0

That song sounds hilarious. Singer would probably be cancelled and pitchforked nowadays with lyrics like that though. Political correctness really ruined humour over the past decade. Part of the reason I hate leftists so much, being behind that shitty movement.

4
Lady_Stallion 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one WANTS fat kids, or ugly ones. Or short male offspring. Natural selection exists for a reason.

4
QSWO1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Brian Stelter's parents agree.

4
Equality72521 4 points ago +5 / -1

The amount of fat on a body has been viewed differently over time and by different cultures. Sure, in our modern culture, it is viewed as unattractive and judged as a lack of self-control. That's primarily because we have more than enough food for almost anyone to eat in Western Societies. Historically though, obesity has been viewed as desirable. Of course, not 400 lbs worth but being 'chunky' has been viewed as desirable. It showed that you had enough money to feed yourself excessively in a world full of borderline starvation. So, in an evolutionary sense being overweight is a very telling signal that you have the wherewithal to procure plenty of food. Being skinny, on the other hand, has been historically viewed as being unhealthy and poor.

2
HumblePig 2 points ago +2 / -0

This pede sociologies.

Also, studies have shown that people who grew up in recessions/times of famine tended to prefer chunkier women (no study available for women on men that I've read). Meaning the new "thicc" trend that's been around the last decade or so is, yup, because of people who hit puberty or grew up during the major recession that started in 2008-2009.

I grew up in an ecnomic bubble and I like heroin-chic thin stick women, this "thicc" trend with a particular focus on ass and thighs has me shaking my old man fist about the corrupted youth today. Turns out there's a science to it, our epigenetics tell us to prefer whatever is more likely to be beneficial in our environment. Those in a recession prefer signs of hardiness and capacity to nurse and support a baby upon conceiving, those in normal or excess can be pickier about highlighted fertility symbols (more pronounced secondary sex characteristics, thinner body parts compared to fuller boobs, neotany, etc.).

Even as someone who never wants kids, the science of what's attractive is fairly hard wired.

2
Equality72521 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a great primer. Thanks for chiming in. This stuff is fascinating to me.

We live in this incredibly complex society and culture but at the root of it all is the drive to survive as a species. Reproduction is the primary way we ensure it. How do we, as a species, ensure that the very best traits get passed down from generation to generation? Clearly, it's not a logical conscious effort. In rare cases where it has been a conscious effort (such as the European monarchy), it doesn't turn out so well.

I grew up where the population is racially homogeneous but saw a variety of shapes and sizes. My preference from a young age has been wide hips, chunky cheeks, and large breasts. Even comically wide and large - lol In High School I remember being concerned that other guys might judge me because of the girls that I liked. That's not to say that I find skinny women unattractive. It's just that they don't catch my attention in the same way but given a changing set of circumstances I believe that could and would change. I mean I didn't care much for steak until I had a good one. Now I seek out steak regularly (ribeye, of course)- lol

2
HumblePig 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had been interested in studies on the male side since writing that comment and wondering i there had been anew new studies, and found some of interest.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296319304382

Key words when I look for this topic are "Resource scarcity" and "beauty standards."

http://www.tpettijohn.net/academic/Pettijohn%20&%20Jungeberg%20-%20Playboy%20Plamate%20Curves%20-%20PSPB%202004.pdf

Hope these get you started, fellow research fan!

1
Equality72521 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you! This is exciting stuff.

2
BobSux 2 points ago +2 / -0

You aren’t wrong but overweight is not the same as obese. This cow on the SI cover is disgustingly fat and deconditioned and sick from eating processed and nutrient deficient garbage.

2
NeverBeFat 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% this. Check my username.

22
coolhandcuke 22 points ago +22 / -0

"I know I play a big role." Such an irony challenged statement.

15
IncredibleMrE1 15 points ago +15 / -0

"Oh wait... Was she a great big fat person?"

"Yes, she was a big girl, sir."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
horsefacestorm 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was thinking that line was from Silence of the Lambs when the police officer was at Buffalo Bills house looking for the missing girl. What is O&A?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
horsefacestorm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah okay, thanks for the clarification.

1
-c-i-a- 1 point ago +2 / -1

Opie and Anthony

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
UnitedStatesofSmash 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quick! Someone find a dinner roll filter for this woman!

16
ThreeTermTrump 16 points ago +20 / -4

JP is based as fuck. Can we adopt him or something?

13
IncredibleMrE1 13 points ago +14 / -1

He's pretty based by Canadian standards.

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago +7 / -7

He's cool, but he's definitely not based.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
batsoup 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's doing more education than you ever will.

-10
Barrabbas -10 points ago +1 / -11

He gets pegged by his tranny wife.

3
Pepper2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hello handshake. Hiding from the feds on 4chan this week?

0
Barrabbas 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am not a pedo fed. You are bad at this.

3
Pepper2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pedo? Who said anything about pedo? So you are new and retarded.

-2
Barrabbas -2 points ago +1 / -3

Bro, I told you about Peterson's tranny wife and sexlife. What are you talking about?

3
Pepper2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Obsessed with trannies and sees them everywhere, my original presumption was correct. Now, based on that, I can also presume you are, most likely, a closet homosexual.

-1
Barrabbas -1 points ago +1 / -2

You seem a strange little man. I'll leave you to yourself.

15
Les_Deplorables 15 points ago +15 / -0

If it's so beautiful, then why do they have to airbrush the shit out of it?

14
Oback_Barama 14 points ago +14 / -0

Looks like a 10* to me!

*(10.0 or higher A1c)

14
trout007 14 points ago +14 / -0

It used to be if someone said they were seeing a Sports Illustrated model it meant they were a rich playboy, now it is likely they are a diabetes educator.

14
newrandomperson 14 points ago +14 / -0

The defeminization of women AND the disintegration of the concept of beauty in the US (and in Canada) has created a whole mass of undesirable women. This is the greatest population control out there.

10
BillionsAndBillions 10 points ago +10 / -0

So many women - even young ones - are overweight, have gross tattoos or piercings, asymmetrical ugly green or pink hair, and hideous frumpy clothing. It's almost shocking to see a normal, healthy, attractive woman these days. Even more shocking if they're pleasant and friendly.

4
newrandomperson 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is getting younger. That's a big issue.

4
Nerdrem1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah it's crazy how many fat young people there are, I think a lot of people might be surprised to learn where the threshold between overweight and obese is in medical terms, it's a lot lower than you might think.

People might look at me weird for saying this irl, but the only thing an 18 year old girl needs to be physically attractive, barring some unfortunate genetics, is to not be fat. I don't even mean they have to be in shape, they just have to not be out of shape and their youth will make up for any shortcomings in other places. More and more young women have insurmountable shortcomings these days.

1
BillionsAndBillions 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heck, here even if you're overweight but have a natural hair color and decent clothes, and are not self-mutilated, you're way ahead of the game. "This person may just be mentally stable. I'm kind of intrigued!" It's a low bar these days, haha.

-8
flashersenpai -8 points ago +4 / -12

Women are more feminine than ever. They're being their true selves without restriction. Sorry.

5
newrandomperson 5 points ago +6 / -1

No they aren't. They actively run counter to biology. Biologically, certain female features are considered attractive irregardless of culture. These are the female features that indicate that the person is able to bear and raise children. Women are intentionally propagandized against this.

4
ArchRespawnsAgain 4 points ago +5 / -1

I have no idea how someone believes shit like this and then finds their way here.

2
QSWO1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sarcasm. Girls that draw on themselves, and, or hit themselves with open tackle boxes may be just going thru a stage in their life. It's why God gave them a expiration date. A weekend of ignorance is not as bad as decades of degenerate behavior.

3
RallyinStJohnsWood 3 points ago +3 / -0

Girls that draw on themselves, and, or hit themselves with open tackle boxes

Good heavens... this is perfect. Is this already a meme, because if you just thought this up, you're a genius.

1
QSWO1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its how I raise my boys .

1
BoughtByBloomberg2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is being more feminine synonymous with lower standards to you?

13
Pulchritude2 13 points ago +15 / -2

Fatasses aren't attractive.

Never have been and never will be, except to fringe fetishists.

Every single "beautiful" fat person in existence would be more beautiful if they weighed less, not more. They are beautiful in spite of their fat, not because of it.

5
Nerdrem1 5 points ago +5 / -0

There aren't any beautiful fat women, just ones that you can tell by their features that they might actually be hot if they dropped 100lbs.

2
Pulchritude2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed.

2
NeverBeFat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never be fat!

12
crazyjackel 12 points ago +13 / -1

Beauty is not a social construct, it is a fundamental essence of recognization of health and for selection towards mates. It is biological, that which is ugly tends toward deviancy and that which is beautiful tends toward transcendence.

7
Lady_Stallion 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly, which is why even babies with no societal conditioning stare at beautiful people.

4
crazyjackel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Babies also have lizard brain disgust factors. Disgust and Beauty are Lizard Brain elements that relate to the fundamental values that are needed to survive as a human.

10
Patriotdragon 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well , it is a slight upgrade from last years tranny cover

1
CornTurd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prediction. Next year is a fat Tranny

9
ThirteenPercenter 9 points ago +9 / -0

“Sports” LOL

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
DoctorJohnnyFever89 8 points ago +14 / -6

That chick isn't that fat? Of course I like some cushion for the pushin. They lost me with the tranny shit in the last few years.

16
HeavenlyTrumpets 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sure she's not colossally fat for just a random person you might see at the grocery store. But for a swimsuit model, yeah, she is. I consider myself nowhere near swimsuit model material. I have three kids, one less than a year old. I had an emergency c section and am still above normal.BMI range. Even with all of that, my body is more appropriate to model than the one I see there. It's just totally absurd. It's that they're intentionally trying to make what's naturally biological attractive, not so.

5
QSWO1 5 points ago +5 / -0

She fat. Normal girls are normal girls after having multiple kids. Not being what you once were, and trying to get back to that should be celebrated. I am a guy that the last few decades took a toll on because life happened. Do I get a celebrated magazine cover for not taking care of myself? Happy belated mother's day. We appreciate your contributions.

-1
DoctorJohnnyFever89 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I understand. I just disagree with Jordan...for once.

1
RallyinStJohnsWood 1 point ago +1 / -0

disagree with Jordan

why ?

1
DoctorJohnnyFever89 1 point ago +1 / -0

That chick is hot. He doesn't think so.

4
SwedishChainsaw2 4 points ago +5 / -1

You've been conditioned to fat acceptance. Back in my day no one , and I mean NO ONE would fuck a woman like that.

7
ScrewReddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who buys these? I'm amazed SI is still around.

7
HeavenlyTrumpets 7 points ago +8 / -1

I just looked up the cover to decide if I thought he was being an ass. I figured he probably wasn't, and I was right. I have three kids, one less than one year old. I recovered from an emergency c section and I'm still not back in normal BMI range yet. And my body, I can confidently say, STILL looks better than the woman who they chose for SI cover. Crazy.

6
barwhack 6 points ago +7 / -1

Objectively not beautiful.

6
vicentezo04 6 points ago +6 / -0

Man the harpoons!

6
jimmyfoxhound 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nope.. fat and overweight is NOT beautiful. It's not beautiful on men and it's not beautiful on women. A country full of fat people dying of diabetes shouldn't be celebrating fat ANYTHING.

5
Psalm_109_8-13 5 points ago +5 / -0

These are the same people who said Michael Obama was the new "black Jackie".

5
J6_Patriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

Just commenting on it is a win for the left.

Why the fuck do you think they did it?

All this shit would die a slow death if we just ignored it instead of acting like triggered offended leftists about it.

3
BillionsAndBillions 3 points ago +3 / -0

Demoralization for the commie cause.

5
12gauge 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem with buying into the delusion that people want to see a fat model, is that you have taken a job away from 2 or 3 actual hot models that could have fit on the cover in her place.

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's what happened to the "Grid Girls" in sport racing. (Ugly) feminists whined about it and they got fired from events.

4
Bastard 4 points ago +4 / -0

I kinda thought they were about supermodels and sporting women, not like Cat Fancy.

4
keepamericagreat102 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sports Illustrated gone gay a while ago, just wait till pride flags and trannies in June.

4
unspecified_user 4 points ago +4 / -0

These successful fat models are more unrealistic than the fit or slender and pretty models. A young woman who takes care of herself is more likely to have a great body and be average pretty to very pretty than a morbidly obese woman is to have a 1 in 10,000 face and neckline that still says pretty/sexy at a 35 BMI.

Most all big ol' tanks of young women have a big ol' fat face to match. That particular cover model, if you only saw her from the collarbones up, looks like you'd never guess that below that is a 250+ slab of beef.

4
personoftheyear 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't know what's so Yumi about her.

I'll see myself out.

3
Zelenskyscockholster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I bet those tits are yumi.

Looks like she finds lots of things yummy.

3
NeverBeFat 3 points ago +3 / -0

I saw the picture. Ugh, gross. Fat is disgusting.

3
Zelenskyscockholster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, she's not ugly.

But I thought the point was to sell magazines. Put me on fucking GQ if that's what women want to see.

3
bluebahloo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Competitive sports would give her a heart attack.

3
jimmajamma 3 points ago +3 / -0

Morons on twitter claiming that fattie is underweight - yeah, maybe for an orc or an orca.

3
Hanging_Chad 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is fine. This is exacting what their subscribers want to see on the swimsuit issue.

3
Lesko_Badcop 3 points ago +3 / -0

At least this one doesn't have a penis.

2
Coolgenner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pig

2
Noadhominem 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next year will be a transsexual burn victim.

2
carl7967 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am not some fag that gushes over celebrities or idolizes people but I absolutely love this man

2
Joshua55 2 points ago +2 / -0

It could be worse, Sports Illustrated could have had Whoopi on the cover wearing a thong bikini.

3
HeavenlyTrumpets 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's always next year

2
Losferwords 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ewwwwwww.

2
Steady3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, no.

2
sgt_richard 2 points ago +2 / -0

indicating that physical attractiveness may be related to reproductive success rates.

No shit!

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's right. La goblina esta mucho gorda!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Les_Deplorables 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roly Poly

Daddy's little fatty

Eatin' corn and taters

Hungry every minute of the day

2
GoldwaterVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

SI has done worse -- warning, you cannot unsee this:

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cdo8aeDLyMA/

1
fponick 1 point ago +1 / -0

My 72 year-old body looks better than this one! Thanks! YOU MADE MY DAY!

1
GoldwaterVoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I turn 79 next week. I pass for 55 to 60 any day of the week, and I ski at 11,000 ft. elevation. Key is to pick your grandparents!

2
Miztivin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perfect way to explain this wird push of false normalcy. Thanks JP!

2
mcoulton 2 points ago +2 / -0

She isn't even attractive for a woman of her weight. She doesn't even have a pretty face, she has saggy breasts, and cellulite on her hips and legs.

2
Coolgenner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bring back Kathy Ireland.

2
cbonez416 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sports illustrated died the moment they put a trans person on the cover. Same for playboy and vogue!!! These are dying rags that our kids will say....this was a real thing back in the day!! Hahaha no one is buying and they believe the shock will help sales. Little do they know they already lost their base and will need to learn to code within the next 2 years.

2
stvgraham 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should have posted a warning before going to that tweet / pic