468
Comments (55)
sorted by:
15
Ex-libtard 15 points ago +15 / -0

I don't support red flag laws.

8
scyenceFiction 8 points ago +8 / -0

Most don't. But...

NY is a "red flag" state, with one of the most overreaching set of conditions. Under NY law, his previous mental health evaluation should have been disqualifying. On top of that, the rifle he used was also illegal under the SAFE Act.

There is a point to be made here. Gun control laws don't work. Get rid of them.

6
Donttreadonme16 6 points ago +6 / -0

The point they will make is “the laws we have aren’t enough! We need more!”

Stop playing along with their logic. This guy was clearly “known to authorities” on purpose just to push red flag laws.

5
scyenceFiction 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for proving a point. Next challenge to NY's unconstitutional gun laws is that they're "capricious and arbitrary" and must be entirely struck. The purpose stated in each is to reduce violent crime- which would force the state to prove that they do, in defense.

They don't, and official FBI and NYSP statistics show that violent crime, including where a gun was used, increased in every year except 2014 after SAFE was passed. That's how you beat libtard "logic".

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

The point of the laws isn't to produce a better outcome, it's to give the government more laws to selectively enforce.

8
acasper 8 points ago +8 / -0

Also prescribed SSRIs and groomed in Discord.

4
MikeObamasVeineyCock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most mass shooters take SSRIs.

3
impera 3 points ago +3 / -0

'allowed to buy gun despite that'

I'd bet money that there are groups of government employees who look for those with mental health red flags.. and who intervene explicitly to make sure they get access to firearms. Who better to keep as an exploitable expendable idiot that you can burn once to make a big ruckus in coordination with coincidentally-preprepared gun control bills.

2
ThisIsHowItStarts 2 points ago +2 / -0

But then they wouldn’t fit the narrative, when they needed to make the phone call, and put that funny noise in his ear to make him go do what he did. It’s all psyop

2
Ampman69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fbi put him on the payroll and handed him the guns.

2
HungrySanta 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Shall not be infringed", as with every freedom, comes with a cost.

This guy most likely wouldn't have done it if he hadn't been encouraged to do it by some shadowy political forces, pretty much guaranteed.

Our country is under attack. Until we accept it and act like it, nothing we do will improve these problems because they aren't organic.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
Kael 3 points ago +3 / -0

Making a law to ensure people don’t get guns is why this happened. You’re falling for the trap. It’s not an organic action. It’s entire point of existing is to make you feel the way you are feeling, and give up your rights.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Kael 2 points ago +2 / -0

Experts agree, posting on patriots.win is an overt sign of mental health issues. You have mental health issues. You posted on Patriots.win. You will no longer be able to purchase guns.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Kael 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at COViD. Think doctors won’t be partisan and make shit up? Masks? Lol. You must be new.

1
Kael 1 point ago +1 / -0

People who want to commit murder don’t care about laws. Obviously. This should be pretty straightforward.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Fundles 1 point ago +1 / -0

If others were armed he wouldnt have even tried.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Fundles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well this one surrendered and is still alive. Either way the threat can be neutralized if the population has the ability to defend themselves.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
fazaman 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, all the left needs to do to strip someone of their gun rights is to come up with some excuse to order mental health evaluations?

They'll just declare that conservatism is a mental disorder. Never underestimate a leftists ability to 'interpret' a law.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Semmelweis 1 point ago +1 / -0

In for a penny, in for a pound, shall not be infringed.

We bring up Waukesha in response to this as in lack of coverage in comparison, but also don't need a gun to rack up a body count. If anything, I want to be given the option to at least attempt to shoot back in either scenario, which a security officer did but didn't penetrate the body armor on the Buffalo shooting.

I do think there's lots of room for improvement on how our country deals with mental health issues though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OGPatriotKing 1 point ago +3 / -2

The people on this forum don't want any sort of background check for owning a weapon .

The people on this forum have become as hardline as the left they claim to hate.

1
Fundles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shall not be infringed. He hit a soft target. Wouldnt have happened if there were armed civilians shopping.