26
posted ago by Eccentrik ago by Eccentrik +26 / -0

Or is that out of millions. I see the vaxxies on reddit arguing that it's out of millions and millions and thus negligible...

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ukbtvi/46000_people_took_the_pfizer_experimental_drugs/

Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
Bullet3250 3 points ago +3 / -0

New UK government data shows the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-government-data-shows-nobody-should?s=r

2
Daddy_Knew_Best 2 points ago +2 / -0

besides that, how do we know any numbers are actually factual at this point?

1
GA_Logic 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is under reported so if you multiply that several times that is the true death rate of the poison jabs.

But to wake up normies showing them these 'official" numbers shows that the vax death rate is higher than the "corona" death rate.

2
Eccentrik [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's what I'm saying though. the 46,000 is 'relevant cases' but the redditors argue that this is out of millions, so really it's 1,200 deaths out of millions reported which would make the vax death rate as low or lower than covid rate (this is what redditors argue, not me, I'm genuinely trying to figure it out

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be true if it weren’t for the fact that the numbers are representative of the trial used to invoke the authorization by the fda.

It was a tiny number of people and iirc half of that 46K were actually given the placebo. Can’t have a trial without a control group.

1
GA_Logic 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 46k comes from the trials with 1200 deaths. So the redditors don't know what they are arguing about.

Pfzier is even admitting this....

Edit: The redditors are conflating trial participants with those that received the jabs within 90 days and saying it was millions by that time which is laughable if you think about it logically.

1
Eccentrik [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess that's where I'm confused. The OP's Pfizer doc screenshot on that reddit thread says "Cumulative Analysis of POST-AUTHORIZATION Adverse Event Reports" during the "reporting interval" (however long that lasted). So I guess the vaxxies are arguing that the numbers were aggregated after the EUA was granted - but wasn't the EUA granted really early, still during the trial period? I dunno, I'm stupid when it comes to this stuff, but I want to make sure I understand this all technically sound because 2.7% death rate would be a YUGE RED PILL

1
GA_Logic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct because the EUA was issued Dec 1tth 2020.

So they are saying from Dec 2020 to Feb of 2021 cumulatively that is the data. But they are conflating trial participants which is a sneaky way to throw people off.

1
texasbobcat5 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing is that we had to lock down b/c of a virus that had 1% death rate b/c that 1% is a lot of people but they are perfectly ok with a 2% death rate for the vaxx? How's that logic work out?