2482
Comments (70)
sorted by:
83
Destineed369 83 points ago +83 / -0

We knew this in 2017

28
IncredibleMrE1 28 points ago +28 / -0

Correct.

19
nozonozo 19 points ago +19 / -0

We always know before the general population.

23
TheWorldsOnBathSalts 23 points ago +23 / -0

Trump knew it before he took the oath.

He should press burglary charges against the entire FBI for their “wiretapping” in Trump Tower.

Watergate gate is a joke compared to this. An average Soros-backed DA wouldn’t even consider taking that case, yet it’s all the Dems can talk about for the last few decades.

3
K-Harbour 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember, he was stuck with Comey at the beginning plus that gal he had to fire. Plus the rouse Pence did on Flynn. Plus Schumer & Pelosi publicly trying to 25th amendment him. All at the same time.

We essentially had a mutuny going on.

3
Zepp87 3 points ago +3 / -0

Generals lying about troop numbers to the commander in chief.

Yeah, definitely mutiny

7
TheContrarian2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Notice the subtitle, "Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year."

Of fucking course. That wasn't planned.

4
bobbydriscolsgoat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't worry if it's part of the durham sealed indictments it has no limitation

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
bobbydriscolsgoat 1 point ago +1 / -0

In justice all are accountable even jurors who lie to get on a jury.

12
GreyGooseDown 12 points ago +12 / -0

I specifically remember a huge stream about this at The_Donald

41
HunterBidensPC 41 points ago +41 / -0

It’s all so redundant at this point. Wake me up when someone is held accountable

5
keepamericagreat102 5 points ago +5 / -0

yep. I think we all knew even back in 2017 that FBI doesn't work for people, it works for the swamp creatures in Washington. Faggots, all of them!

2
RStroud 2 points ago +2 / -0

The FBI has been a grievous enemy of the people since its inception. It can not be reformed or redeemed. A secret police force is antithetical to our Republic.

2
libertyhominid 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you asking that this not be discussed?

1
AssPhixEAtion627 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. When the heads start rollin ill know its real.

0
endofsilence808 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice knowing you

23
RaberContour 23 points ago +23 / -0

The intelligence agencies are the enemy of the people, maybe even moreso than the media

The CIA starts wars and the FBI entraps citizens to create terrorism

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
19
IncredibleMrE1 19 points ago +19 / -0

Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year. The question is why the DOJ — and Durham in particular — gave the FBI a free pass. The uncomfortable answer may be that, as has been suspected for a while, Durham’s authority is effectively limited to private actors such as Sussmann and Danchenko and does not extend to public officials such as McCabe and Strzok.

Plenty of us have been saying for years now that Durham was a coverup op. If you thought the Ghost of KFC appointed Durham to do anything other than protect the institutions, I have many authentic Brooklyn Bridges for sale.

8
Rudy_DankMemer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ghost of KFC appointed Durham to do anything other than protect the institutions,

Underrated.

8
JMaN 8 points ago +8 / -0

These institutions are extremely damaged at this point.

What is the statute of limitations referring to? Lying? General Michael Flynn was setup by these criminal thugs and the judge literally said some garbage about treason to General Flynn. Look at all the other victims of this nonsense.

If all of the evidence points to treason/sedition then what is the statute of limitations there?

3
catch-a-penny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great question.

9
deletedandreacted 9 points ago +9 / -0

Of course they did.

8
realPhantomFuck 8 points ago +9 / -1

Annnnnnnnnd nothing will happen

9
IncredibleMrE1 9 points ago +9 / -0

The notes didn't come out until after the statute of limitations expired. So you're quite correct.

4
JMaN 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is no statute of limitations for treason/sedition.

If Judge Sullivan thought there was good enough reason to accuse General Flynn of treason (I believe he later apologized, very, very odd) in the middle of court proceedings over "lying" - and General Flynn took a plea deal because they were threatening his son with a newborn child - and the media (also involved) used that as propaganda ammunition for what exactly???

And General Flynn was part of President Trump's cabinet... So they conspired and lied to achieve what goal???

What is the statute of limitations on that goal?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
barefootozark 7 points ago +7 / -0

The only paragraph that matters:

Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year. The question is why the DOJ — and Durham in particular — gave the FBI a free pass. The uncomfortable answer may be that, as has been suspected for a while, Durham’s authority is effectively limited to private actors such as Sussmann and Danchenko and does not extend to public officials such as McCabe and Strzok.

There you have it. Statute of limitations to prosecute FBI has passed. Durham is only allowed to prosecute private officials.

2
Idontevenknow 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's it, end statute of limitations. The publicly enforced "justice system" is gonna be a hoot once the fall is compete.

7
grassshrimp 7 points ago +7 / -0

Most of the left has no idea whatsoever that the entire Russia fiasco was a Hillary/FBI plot to remove President Trump. 4 years of non-stop bullshit and fake news NYT win's Pulitzer for reporting bullshit.

6
CMDRConanAAnderson 6 points ago +6 / -0

As I've always said, these aren't lone wolf agents committing crimes out of the blue. This was an operation and it involved multiple people from multiple agencies working together toward an obvious, crystal clear goal to continue the operation when every indicator was that this should have been shut down from the start. If that is true, then this needs to be prosecuted for what it is, a racketeering operation. Throw everyone in on the criminal activity into jail and let them rat out the higher ups for sentences reduced. This is a grave crime that should have never happened and it would have never happened, had criminals and fraudsters not been handing each other insider data to keep the lie alive.

5
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rank & Vile

5
SaveUsSCOTUS 5 points ago +5 / -0

North Korea would’ve been reunited with the south if it wasn’t for the threat of impeachment with the mueller witch hunt. Imagine all the other wins we would’ve had.

5
mrh218 5 points ago +5 / -0

The progress there was amazing, but do you think this really was close to happening?

5
tholinz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not a chance. The cost of reunification is so high that it’ll never happen. But better diplomatic relations and NKorea opening up, perhaps with conditions improving for their own people, was probably achievable.

At the very least, we wouldn’t be helping some actor in Ukraine and his Neo-Nazi battalion kill Russian generals

2
SaveUsSCOTUS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. It was Moon who soured the pot and the. Both sides were leery of promises from the USA president who could be removed any moment. Remember the Dems ran a mueller hearing while Trump was literally on his trip there

3
Logan051361 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hang all of them

3
BoberFett 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year."

Unless someone goes after this as a RICO case, which the conspiracy against Trump is. Then the statute of limitations is based on the most recent date of conspiratorial action, which is ongoing.

3
Jrgill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are they trying to say that the DOJ is innocent, and didn’t actively participate in the FBI rouse? If so, who’s buying into this?

3
untumulted 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except...the DOJ was in on it.

3
Talen_Card 3 points ago +3 / -0

Statute of limitation on treason?

3
Isaiah53 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Misled" is a misleading term.

Colluded is the word to be used here.

3
I_Love_45-70_Gov 3 points ago +3 / -0

But they was duped by Sussmann.

Duped, I tell ya....

3
roadrunner0 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they deliberately ran out the clock to protect the traitors on the count of lying.. Treason has no statute of limitations and I hope they all hang by the neck until dead for their oath violations.. They directly impeded a duly elected President and yes that is Treason..

3
Drewniverse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never trust a Sussman. They are always sus. It's in the name.

2
NotProgCensored 2 points ago +2 / -0

Durham saying Sussman lied to the FBI is like me telling an obese woman that she looks great. Charge the FBI agents!

2
Lawless 2 points ago +2 / -0

How are these agents not in jail

2
VikingHalo45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fire them and arrest them.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, they'll get promotions then.

2
rextexMG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unbelievable. An no one has been held to account. No way do I believe comey, McCabe etc. Just struck out on their own. Obama and Biden have their fingers in starting this, alongside Hillary.

2
Snoman 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Misled” whatchu talkin bout Willis ?

2
Riggs99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Question.

Wasnt there supposed to be 2 Durhams?

I though I read before (like 2 years ago) that he had a son, also a prosecutor, and was working even more behind the scenes on a case or cases in other jurisdictions?

People are dooming about nothing happening , in this case, to the FBI....but this still has now entered the treason into official record.

Maybe there are other cases ongoing? Wasnt that being heavily hinted at for years already?

Sonehow it seems odd that the fate of the country and high treason is relying on this single spying/fake dossier case being tried in a corrupt court with most likely biased jury etc.

It is maybe for show to the public? It cant be only on this. Either there is something big still happening in the background, say with those 300k seal indictments...or there isnt. In which case everything is fucked because this case is certainly not enough to take down a global cabal.

2
HumblePede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, we've known this for a long time. And don't let them fool you. They've known this for a long time, probably longer, as well.

The main takeaway here is that the MSM has been given their new talking points. They are turning on Resident Joe and his crime family publicly. They know they can't control this narrative any longer and they're working get ahead of the fallout.

2
Bullet3250 2 points ago +2 / -0

How Many Crimes is the FBI allowed to get away with?

1
suzookus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Defund FBI

1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok so this info is like two years old.

1
00Gonzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today I learned that treason has a five year statute of limitations

1
Kano 1 point ago +1 / -0

Old

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

Handwritten notes are useful to mislead people because you can write them years later and post date them to 2016. If they were really from 2016 they would have been in the FBI system with a locked date. Now you know why the agents released handwritten notes.

1
GodKingHarambe 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many of those handwritten notes feature Lisa Page and Peter Strzoks doodlings of dicks

1
RogueLeaderX 1 point ago +1 / -0

FBI needs to be nuked ASAP!

1
FLIBS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure they will be reprimanded.... haha

1
JoeBidensDementia1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inadmissable probably. IANAL

1
Fangerang 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone arrested or executed for treason yet? Nah, didn't think so.

1
JetJocky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mislead the DOJ ? They knew this was bogus the same as the FBI did.

1
StrangerThanFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

While the notes were only publicly released last week, they have been available to Barr, Durham and the DOJ for much longer. Yet no action was taken.

Crucially, public release of the notes came after the five-year statute of limitations had lapsed in March of this year. The question is why the DOJ — and Durham in particular — gave the FBI a free pass. The uncomfortable answer may be that, as has been suspected for a while, Durham’s authority is effectively limited to private actors such as Sussmann and Danchenko and does not extend to public officials such as McCabe and Strzok.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
Jibideen -2 points ago +2 / -4

GOP demands for investigation intensifies /// patriots.win memes keep doing nothing