Comments (131)
sorted by:
Pepbrandt 102 points ago +102 / -0

This is why Homeland Security is putting "being conservative" on a watch list. They're doing this evil stuff knowing it will enrage people.

MyPersonalExp 20 points ago +26 / -6

At this point no one is going to do a fucking thing.

deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
borntacticool 3 points ago +3 / -0

Firearms no longer represent a solemn duty to protect the country from foreign and domestic enemies, but products for commoditization. They might as well be trendy accessories like purses for women. They've become adult toys.

deleted 89 points ago +89 / -0
TeeBP 46 points ago +48 / -2

Inb4 this gets .win taken down for CP or some retarded shit like that.

VolareVia 43 points ago +44 / -1

The only silver lining to this, and it's real dull, is that the text leaves open the possibility that "Sabrina" is an adult with a younger brother "Toby", and that "Marco" is an adult boyfriend.

Still disturbing as fuck that anyone would put this in a children's book, and write it like an older sister describing sex she's had in detail to her minor brother.

Absolute degenerates.

Junionthepipeline 8 points ago +8 / -0

.win gets taken down when who pays the Bill's wants it down and not before

US3RNAM3 3 points ago +3 / -0

School should be taken down for cp

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
GodHatesBiden 4 points ago +10 / -6

this exact photo was from an article posted before this bitch posted this.

so she's fake, or a woman looking for attention on a subject that was already exposed like a week before.

gross either way but I also cringe at female attention seeking behavior.

pavlova 4 points ago +4 / -0

ha, I saw the whole thing and was like "it's not even a girl being fake behind this, it's a very creepy dude"

gillonba 68 points ago +69 / -1

little brother

They aren't just children, they are siblings.

Brellin 47 points ago +47 / -0

Read the names again anon, the two having sex are Marcus and Sabrina, the one asking if that's what sex is was named Toby. There's three characters mentioned. I realize it's an easy mistake to make, I thought it was incest at first as well, but on second reading it's made clearly that Toby and Sabrina (whom are certainly related) aren't the ones having sex... in this passage, god knows what the book says on other pages.

VarusSPQR 57 points ago +57 / -0

If it confuses adults, kids will certainly be confused. That’s intentional.

love_and_peace 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yep, the short sibling convo is seemingly out of context and wedged between the immediate finishing of sex and then a picture of two in bed. It's creating an association there.

JKillen 9 points ago +9 / -0

You would have gotten slapped and grounded for talking like this to a kid in your school if the adults found out

TheAttackTitan 11 points ago +11 / -0

What isn’t clear is if the little brother is observing them having sex. If that’s the case, it would make this already disturbing book even more disturbing. Even if the brother isn’t in the room, and this is just a casual conversation, it’s an incredibly fucked up topic to write about, especially for kids.

lixa 8 points ago +8 / -0

Meanwhile there’s a teddy bear in the bed (who I first mistook for the younger brother 😓) which indicates the couple are kids themselves.

UnitedStatesofSmash 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice this. It feels like this was done intentionally.

gillonba 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because it's OK if (in this tiny excerpt) the little brother is just watching his sister have sex? I don't know what kind of family you grew up in, but that wouldn't fly in my house

Brellin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, I never said it was okay, I was just saying it (probably) wasn't incest.

MetalRiddle 6 points ago +6 / -0

If this isn't paedophilia:

What does the teddy bear wearing underwear staring at them represent?

Brobold 6 points ago +6 / -0

The cuck

TheAttackTitan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe the teddy bear is Toby? And Toby is the vehicle for the child reading the book. Like you as the child reader are supposed to be vicariously experiencing what Toby is seeing.

Totalitarian 52 points ago +52 / -0

If you're unfortunate enough to be the child of one of these demons you'll find that your narcissistic parents will have no boundaries, will want to be your best buddy (and be jealous and angry if they're not), will discuss topics inappropriate for your age and maturity level, and then want to relive their failed childhoods through yours.

How do I know? My parents were amazing selfless people, but I've seen enough shit from friend's parents to know this to be true.

IBentMyWookie 7 points ago +7 / -0

I finally “became friends” with my parents at 30. It’s been ten years of that status and they’ll still call me out on my shit.

They were old school; “we’re your parents first, then a friend.” As it should be.

MaoHadOnly1Testicle 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot "give you hormone blockers and chop off your schlong because mom wants to one-up Sandra and her gay son".

deleted 41 points ago +41 / -0
Brellin 22 points ago +22 / -0

She's not "talking" about sex pede. Sounds to me like she's literally having sex in front of her little brother.

Krat 8 points ago +8 / -0

Are you sure it's not with ?

Brellin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless Marcus is also her brother I'm pretty sure it's not with. Granted I haven't read the rest of this book, only what's in the screencap.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
Brellin 10 points ago +10 / -0

Homeschool them instead, they'll come out better educated, happier, and there's no risk of them being groomed by people you don't know

clownworld30330 5 points ago +5 / -0


lixa 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are also homeschool groups with likeminded people where parents share the teaching and the kids still get to have more friends around. There are options besides public school.

Bandhandshakevet 17 points ago +18 / -1

Because you are watching an actual attack on the foundations of our society unfold.

There's no other reason for this. They are evil, there are no shades of grey here.

deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
Bandhandshakevet 7 points ago +7 / -0

I concur

trumpman1776 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

we look at ancient times as barbaric and backwards

but they really weren't

witch burnings didn't come from nowhere

they recognized the necessity of getting rid of these ppl for the town/country to survive

america just became to tolerant and forgot that the ppl in olden times knew what they were doing..

they did it because it was necessary

Wagingliberty 4 points ago +5 / -1

witch burnings didn't come from nowhere

The first 'witch' executed in America was an elderly property owning woman who refused to sell her land to her neighbor. Witch burning was nothing more than a more barbaric version of eminent domain. The kid fucking demons were then as now the nobility, bureaucrats, clergy and monarchs. They got away with their crimes as low IQ retards had kangaroo courts accusing everyone they didn't like of being a witch. Chances were the accusers were the town degenerates because no one of good faith lets innocent people die for bullshit crimes.

cherryred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, I rarely hear that interpretation from either side. How refreshing to see someone ACTUALLY addressing reality instead of twisting exciting, salacious stories for their cause.

Bandhandshakevet 3 points ago +9 / -6

100% agree.

For example:

Do you really think our founders who created our nation and whom many of us look up to designed the voting system to exclude women just because they were big meanies and wanted to be mean to women. They had mothers and sisters too and like us loved them and probably treated women better than us.

They also knew the emotional way women think, how they evolved to use social skills to manipulate, how they had trouble not abusing power and in situation when they had power not being able to self police and be objective.

Perhaps they considered that they'd vote for something that "feels good" without logic being applied or considering long term consequences. Sound familiar?

cherryred 2 points ago +9 / -7

Man, stop using women as a scapegoat when you can find no shortage of men and male rinos selling out America for quick pleasure and consoom culture.

Bandhandshakevet 4 points ago +6 / -2

Easy.. just an example dude, I am aware of that. I know there are some red pilled af women and that majority of white women voted for Trump. My girl is at least as red pilled as me, in some ways she pointed out shit I didn't even think of.

cherryred -4 points ago +6 / -10

Lmao, you were the one making ridiculous claims about women as fact, and you’re telling me to “woah there take it easy” after I just pointed out the obvious and disagreed with you?

krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is a fact that women are more emotional than men.

gamephreak5 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Gtfo, cuck faggot! Letting women vote was the downfall of America! FACT! Our founding fathers knew what they were doing, and women are completely controlled by their emotions and are huge manipulators of men!


Wagingliberty 1 point ago +4 / -3

They didn't exclude women from voting dipshit. Women who owned land had a vote. Poor trash disposable men who owned no land like yourself didn't. That was a good system. They wrecked it with an income tax that gave poor trash a vote and then expanded it to every one.

Bandhandshakevet 2 points ago +3 / -1

You are retarded, so confident in your wrong statements. Go read. It's very pathetic.

Seethe more faggot.

Yaemz123 0 points ago +2 / -2

You need to check your history again. Originally, any landowner could vote. This included blacks and women. Not coincidentally, the only tax on people was a land tax. Those who paid the taxes voted for the government that spent the taxes.

Bandhandshakevet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Free landowning men.

Julia_J 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ancient times also had slavery and sacrifice in most places.

IBentMyWookie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Teddy bear is to instill comfort/positive conditioning to a child reading this trash. “Well if Teddy likes to watch…..”

spinometer 2 points ago +2 / -0

teddy bears are for kids

also represent kids

SuperChicken 32 points ago +32 / -0

Flamethrowers fellas.... flamethrowers.

UpInSpace5 15 points ago +15 / -0


Parhelion12 2 points ago +2 / -0

Violent method of death well never see.

AmericanChevalier 21 points ago +21 / -0

What kind of sick story is this? I can't believe children are able and allowed to read this satanic trash.

Humanpudding 19 points ago +19 / -0

Oh look, a Biden family biography.

Vlad_The_Impaler 18 points ago +20 / -2

this is incest!



Brellin 7 points ago +7 / -0

We don't know it's incest for sure without knowing the rest of the passage. Marcus is the one having sex, not Toby (the little brother). That doesn't mean it isn't incest, maybe Marcus is also the brother of Toby and Sabrina, but on the face of it it seems like this is just a very disturbing conversation happening between an older sister and her younger brother. Between that and the picture this is entirely inappropriate for children age 4-8, the target demographic, and quite frankly I don't think this should be in a school library period.

Bandhandshakevet 8 points ago +9 / -1

I'm with Vlad, these people need to be impaled on a pike from the anus going through their mouth. I know some of them would probably enjoy it but still.

I would then walk away with a smile on my face, and skipping knowing I did the right thing.

Inquisitor_Corvus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I call the motion. Those in favor of Impalement? Raucous yes! Opposed? <crickets> Motion carrys, unanimously.

Undying 15 points ago +15 / -0

The closest thing about sex in my school's library was the Websters dictionary where we would look up the word "sex" and giggle then we discovered the word "sexpot" and laughed harder. The 90s.

DeadOverRed 14 points ago +14 / -0

Mom 1: "How did your kid get so smart?"

Mom 2: "He didn't read a single book in school."

xanaxagoras 8 points ago +8 / -0

little brother !!?

PatrickHangry 8 points ago +8 / -0

As obscene and messed up as this is, the only thing that surprises me is that they're grooming kids for straight sex for once.

Caroigne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to feed Moloch without it.

Keiichi81 7 points ago +7 / -0

But if they don't teach 6-year-olds about sex, then how will they know how to please the pedophile elites?

thetiff 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is zero reason for 4-8 year olds to know this information. All my 5 year old knows is that God gives the daddy a seed and the daddy gives that to the mommy and she grows it in her tummy. He understands that enough to satisfy his level of interest.

krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ooh I like that explanation. Not bad.

thetiff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe in being honest with my kids, but on a level of detail that is appropriate.

Tenspot20 5 points ago +5 / -0

We'll put your ass in jail for that shit here in Fernando County, Florida!

Demand National Anti Grooming (NAG) Legislation!

deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
Barrabbas 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you ever wondered what kind of books Germans burned in the world wars. There you go. This kind of garbage.

Wexit-Delecto 5 points ago +5 / -0

what in the fuck

Legionnaire0311 5 points ago +5 / -0

And then, for no reason at all…

JohnCandle 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hitler got elected into power.

Guildpro101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wood chipper needs feedin

Bandhandshakevet 4 points ago +5 / -1

The library staff and decision makers need to be quickly and efficiently seized by a citizen possee.

Let them have last words to apologize for grooming children and destroying society. Confess their evil deeds and allow them to beg god for forgiveness. Give them a quick last rights ceremony if they want - we're not uncivilized. Then they need to be hanged publicly for the rest of the evil demons that have embedded into our society to see their future.

Honest to god this is how people would have responded not all that long ago. I'm convinced that if they pulled this shit in the 90s or early 2000s they'd have met this just fate.

FromSethWithLove 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like humans in the past weren't able to figure out sex without picture books. We're witnessing the product of some perv's fetish, made for groomer pedophiles who literally run our schools

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
UpInSpace5 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit, this is why kids NEED to be homeschooled.

Areyoukidding15 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is incest.

Woodchipper the inbred freaks.

cbone87 2 points ago +2 / -0

People are learning what books the nazis burned...

TrustNo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Sprays semen." Did they get sex ed from the movie The Happytime Murders?

ChynahIzAzzhole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your districts library should have its inventory online.

Hickory 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a West Virginian, I'm appalled. Incest is our thing! Cultural appropriation!!!

Truthseeker0120 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would beat the shit out of anyone that offered that book to a child or grandchild of mine. I don't have grandchildren and I think maybe that was a blessing...sometimes.

magapatriot_pa 2 points ago +2 / -0

These people need to go to jail

ZombieJSBach 2 points ago +2 / -0

This stuff reminds me of the Reavers in the movie Serenity. They were humans who were transformed into maniacal killers by some kind of sci-fi genetic modifications. They would mostly attack and kill normal humans but they would also turn some into maniacs like themselves by traumatizing them.

I feel like the people pushing this were abused or exposed to inappropriate things early in life and are perpetuating the cycle.

Tune-A-Fish 2 points ago +2 / -0

They want some Aldous Huxley Brave New World oogly googly shit in the public schools

HeavyMetalPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please HOMESCHOOL your kids.

I highly suspect most of the parents who say "that won't happen at my kids' school" would be very surprised by what's actually happening at their school.

JKillen 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fuck is the teddy bear looking so happy about? Cuck

googurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why the fuck is this discussed with an 8 year old? MY TEN YEAR OLD wouldn't be allowed near anything like this.

dagoat4l 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally not grooming.

TimT 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am aginst book burning but this is defiantly the exception

FromSethWithLove 0 points ago +2 / -2

The Weimar Republic produced degenerate books that were the actual books burned by the nazis. You have more in common with Hitler than just drinking water!

RachetQueen2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would report it to the police as child porn/solicitation of a minor. Something.

FART_IN_THE_TOILET 2 points ago +2 / -0

You wouldn’t believe the number of people on Twitter defending this Wednesday.

Oh wait, you totally would.

Semmelweis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember being exposed to such crap like that when I was about 10 years old.

Wasn't at a library though, had to dial into a BBS and confirm a bunch of piracy jargon and popular groups like "RiSC=Rise in Superior Couriering" and supply references, then I could finally download 4 bit color pr0n and weird tales about body parts I didn't know anything about.

TexasPiper 3 points ago +3 / -0

God help you if your parents or older sibling had to use the phone.

I’d kill to go back to those days.

OGPatriotKing 2 points ago +2 / -0

what the fu

MetalRiddle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just some good old fashioned wholesome left wing incest...

NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

REEEE Homophobe/Transphobe book!!!! It must be censored!!!

TargetsOfInterest 1 point ago +1 / -0

The book is accurate though I'll give them that.

100% the spray is coming when it feels the nicest.

eupraxia128 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get the nooses ready.

ghettometal 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF, this Teddybear disturbes me the most. This makes it look like an adult women is abusing a kid. 4.-8 olds? Definitely grooming. Who is the author? And whats his/her early life section?

ConstitutionNailedIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy shit.

katsumi27 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody is talking about the bear?