1497
Comments (128)
sorted by:
122
Fussbudget 122 points ago +122 / -0

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

33
WindyCityBluez 33 points ago +36 / -3

Their is a library full of infringement. America is lost

15
GodDamnedEngineer 15 points ago +15 / -0

WE ARE GOING TO NEED YOU TO APPLY FOR A LICENSE TO USE YOUR FREE SPEECH. ONE CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE DISINFORMATION BOARD.

2
Demijinx 2 points ago +2 / -0

I AGREE! CAPSLOCK GETS THE BITCHES.

1
GodDamnedEngineer 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHAT CAN I SAY. THEY LIKE LETTERS THAT CAN STAND TALL AND ERECT LONG ENOUGH TO GET THE JOB DONE.

1
Demijinx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

2
NavySTG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Already has been....

1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

100%

0
SquirreleeDan 0 points ago +1 / -1

ALREADY INFRINGED AND NOBODY CARES.

63
libman 63 points ago +63 / -0

Washington DC getting nuked would make the world a much better place...

14
BostonVoter 14 points ago +14 / -0

I concour. I wouldn't even be mad. That cesspool is toxic and a nuke would solve the problem. Omg yes !

16
ShadowyMrBlank 16 points ago +16 / -0

Use a neutron bomb. Preserve the buildings, at least.

7
BostonVoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Whatever it takes. I honestly don't care what kind of Bombs or rockets they use. As long as all corrupt government officials and Zelensky are killed , then the world will find peace ✌️ and be a better place for our children and our national debt

8
Wearyman 8 points ago +8 / -0

Real Americans put significant effort into the classic buildings in DC. I wouldn't want those destroyed. Something that would kill the politicians there but leave the buildings intact would be ideal. I like the sound of a Neutron Bomb.

3
Hullohoomans 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about a plague amplified by a "vaccine"

2
Wearyman 2 points ago +2 / -0

We already have that. But the Elites got the saline, so unless you plan on releasing one via some other method, I think that won't work.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think neutron bombs leave infrastructure radioactive.

0
Talon54 0 points ago +1 / -1

They would affect metals more than concrete or wood.

0
Talon54 0 points ago +1 / -1

The radiation from a neutron bomb has a very short half life. A neutron is still a low yield hydrogen bomb so there is still a very large explosion. To preserve the buildings the bomb would have to be air burst and a significant distance from any structure you want to preserve.

1
rcstl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why? who needs characterless bland architecture? I'm talking about the three letter buildings not the historic buildings.

2
PatriotDescendant 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd miss Ocean City, MD. Hopefully the winds blow west...

1
ShinLona 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. They aren't getting off that easily. It will be slow and painful. Plenty of time to contemplate just how much they fucked up... in Minecraft.

7
SlumberBalu 7 points ago +8 / -1

Korea, china and Middle East entered chat

1
Liberals_R_Idiots 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jeremy Corbyn enters into the chat

1
ArchbishopofKekistan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ew. He can cause high tide with that gravitational pull from his yuge ass.

4
PatriotDescendant 4 points ago +4 / -0

I tend to agree.

Hopefully they can hit NYC, SF, LA and Chicago along the way.

1
Joe_Snow 1 point ago +1 / -0

How large of a nuke would radiate say a 35 mile radius...? Wanna know how much time I have to evacuate should Chicago get nuked.

1
Talon54 1 point ago +2 / -1

You should evacuate Chicago now. Why wait for a nuclear bomb? Or as Dubya used to say "nucular".

59
airborne3502 59 points ago +59 / -0

The same DOJ that cleared former Attorney General Eric Holder for Fast and Furious? The program that put 2,000 untracked weapons into the hands of drug dealers?

24
MasterChef 24 points ago +24 / -0

One if those weapons got in the hands of a terrorist in France, who proceeded to shoot over 200 people.

11
BigIronBigIron 11 points ago +11 / -0

Whoopsie daisies!

2
BoberFett 2 points ago +2 / -0

The DOJ has investigated and themselves and cleared themselves of any wrongdoing.

46
Gans 46 points ago +46 / -0

These fuckers stole my vote, cost me 2 good jobs with their vax bs, destroyed the country, decimated the economy, and now they want to make me, a legal gun owner into an outlaw. I'm not sure they grasp the ramifications of forcing a man into this kind of position.

20
FuckReddit4545 20 points ago +20 / -0

I'm not sure they grasp the ramifications of forcing a man into this kind of position.

What ramifications? They've gotten away with anything and everything, all without a single shot being fired. They rigged the census, they stole an election, they crashed the market, inflation is out of control, food shortages are around the corner, were on the cusp of WW3, and we can't figure out who to vote for in PA lol.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once you break the seal, there is no going back. We've kept the powder dry this long for a reason. Do not mistaken our inaction for weakness.

0
Gans 0 points ago +2 / -2

You've got the attitude of someone who'll hand over their guns and bend the knee; whiney.

0
FuckReddit4545 0 points ago +1 / -1

Vote harder next time

0
Gans 0 points ago +2 / -2

Whine harder, bitch. I'm sure that'll do something.

7
NimbleNomad9 7 points ago +7 / -0

They do. Hence why they are setting up state disinformation boards and claiming domestic terrorism is the biggest thing ever.

6
SaltyKrakenBalls 6 points ago +6 / -0

How are your welding skills? The mass assembly of Marvin Heemeyer’s will result…

4
Badfinz_FL 4 points ago +4 / -0

so far all you've done about it is type angry messages on a web board

until people like you unite, organize train and then do something, this gets worse

not voting our way out this time

they've taken that box and flushed it

they are going after the onyl one we have left that is a true threat to them.

3
Inquisitor_Corvus 3 points ago +3 / -0

The REAL inconvenient truth

1
Gans 1 point ago +2 / -1

"All you've done is type angry messages on a web board." Not really. I'm sure you're about to tell me all about the real shit you've done eh?

26
okayokay 26 points ago +26 / -0

Probably won't go anywhere, but even if it does magically pass no one would do anything.

30
ChickenInspector 30 points ago +30 / -0

It won't pass, but they'll just enforce it anyways.

2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make the door kickers unsure if they will return to their families (which are probly waifu blowup dolls).

14
keepamericagreat102 14 points ago +14 / -0

if we dont fight, it might pass.

if it passes only left will have access to guns legally, people on the right are too cucked to break rules usually.

7
FuckReddit4545 7 points ago +7 / -0

This comment brought me back to the calguns.net days. Our side is so fucking cucked that they took pride in navigating all the bull shit rules. It was like a badge of honor. Oh you have to get this stamp for that, turn X in it's now illegal, oh that gun isn't on the CA roster / safe list, beg a cop to sell you one and be sure to register it!

2
keepamericagreat102 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep i know that one. its still same. i just started breaking rules anyway, 30 mag clips… no pin to reload… burst fire… hell with unjust rules.

1
FuckReddit4545 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same, had 30 rounders in my rifle day one, ripped that stupid bullet button out as well. Who the hell are they to tell me how I can drop a mag lol.

22
BloodDe 22 points ago +22 / -0

DOJ needs to be disbanded

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Articles of Confederation weren't that bad after all.

1
BloodDe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree but I think I was responding to someone’s comment about the DOJ

20
TheOutlawPepeWales 20 points ago +20 / -0

Do you know what is in the Constitution? "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

Do you know what is NOT in the Constitution? The DOJ

You lose, Spartacus.

3
Pewpew4life 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good day, sir!!

12
JoeMcCarthyWasRight 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hey Feds. SUCK MY DICK!

10
anon2309011 10 points ago +11 / -1

How to retroactively make everyone who owns a legal firearm a criminal over night.

Then they just don't approve anyone's license.

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then they just don't approve anyone's license.

That is the point of this

1
VoidWanderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, that might actually be the kick in the ass a lot of people need to do something other than sitting around with their thumbs firmly in their ass expecting voting to fix the problem.

9
AnIdahoan 9 points ago +9 / -0

Shall not be infringed. And it'll die on the floor. Or at least it better.

2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thankfully the RINOs haven't been willing to play that game. And Manchin couldn't play either.

7
MyOathNeverEnded 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Shall not be infringed".

6
Recyclops 6 points ago +6 / -0

Infringe, verb: act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

Synonyms: undermine, erode, diminish, weaken

5
grenades_and_ham 5 points ago +5 / -0

What they can't pass through legislation they find work arounds through executive orders and department policy pratices to circumvent the constitution and enact their radical policies.

We're seeing it now with their new green deal bullshit, a total war on energy production.

Most people didn't realize this started day one right under our noses.

No compromise, total domination and conservatives just take it.

5
BostonVoter 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Putin nuked Washington DC.... I'd be voting for putin in 2024 , he's be my hero

2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Broski over there can't be accused of being not pro-Russia. Wish our leaders could be pro-US.

5
obamagavemeaphone 5 points ago +5 / -0

SHALL

NOT

BE

INFRINGED

5
EllisDee25 5 points ago +5 / -0

2A

4
WindyCityBluez 4 points ago +4 / -0

Faggot, wanna be Spartacus. We need more rope.

4
DJTXLV 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck that 8-ball-headed faggot.

The Constitution needs to be upheld… FOR ONCE.

4
machotaco 4 points ago +4 / -0

My inalienable right to keep and bear supersedes any need for a license.

Politicians are more dangerous. It’s high time we regulate them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Meanwhile, they already are going through with the bans on 80% lowers

Stop spreading BS. That is not what has been done, yet

They've already shut down two companies that were selling unfinished lowers this week

what two companies? if you are referring to JSD Supply as one that is not what happened

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
TrumpVoter1 0 points ago +1 / -1

and you need to read the determination that the ATF put out. I have. multiple times already. and i am referring to 80% lowers specifically and not pistol braces. There is not one bit of wording whatsoever that 80% lowers are or are to be illegal. Not one. The closest you get are the complete BBS kits which if interpreted correctly will be required to be serialized and go through an FFL for purchase. And at that point those frames would not even be 80% frames as there would be no need to make them such

4
Jackhererer 4 points ago +4 / -0

I bet they'd be exempt from this as well.

4
Truglow 4 points ago +4 / -0

The continuation of stupidity in the good ole US of A. I don't care what anyone has to say, we cant live along side these "people" and survive. Time to draw a new map.

3
Liberals_R_Idiots 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a reason Iran refers to Washington as the Great Satan!

2
ArchbishopofKekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there a Satan in Islam?

1
VoidWanderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

"allah" is the biblical depiction of "satan."

3
Jemmy 3 points ago +3 / -0

DC v Heller already confirmed gun ownership is a fundamental right (not that we needed their permission).

3
Archimedes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's apply this thinking to other parts of the Bill of Rights:

How about a "Free Speech License"? or a "License to Practice a Religion"?

FJB

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why do you think they're starting with the one that might be dangerous to them if people found their balls?

3
Ullyr_Atreides 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao, they have no issues to run on other than being tyrants

3
frogface 3 points ago +3 / -0

But a signature to vote is a civil rights violation ?

1
DixMcCoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

listen here, frogface - poor kids are just as smart as asian and white kids and that articluate well spoken negro Obarry couldn't even obtain ID my wife's husband c'mon jack the money pox to Kyviy -- you can't write that, it's like a fairy tale ending

3
DZP1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gee, I was reading the Constitution and it didn't quite say that was allowable even by would-be dictators. How about if that bitch Pelosi goes to hell? How about FUCK the Marxist Dems and their takeover attempts choosing to ignore the Constitution.

3
TravlingThr0ugh 3 points ago +3 / -0

It will get struck down because of the burden.

2
Badfinz_FL 2 points ago +2 / -0

they try this everytime they get control of congress

SCOTUS has ruled on this already

stop posting this up, wasting our time

2
Darkheartisland 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why not have a license to get an abortion?

2
MrM4590 2 points ago +2 / -0

No.

2
Doubld 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats have been trying to take away the 2nd Amendment for decades.
Just say no.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ShampocalypseWOW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine wanting to impose upon people the need to get a license from the government to exercise a right that that governments' founding documents specifically bars from needing things like a license from the government.

2
BostonVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's time we make these fucks Register their abortions on public websites. And the name of the father. History of all abortions and maybe a live video feed of them killing the baby. With their home address

2
xBigCoffinHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like infringement

2
RolandDelacroix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Following the Illinois system, because it's never been challenged. We have to apply for a FOID card and pay a fee before buying any firearm.

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +1 / -0

the difference here is the democrat owned DOJ will just not issue any license. Game, set, match

0
Joe_Snow 0 points ago +1 / -1

It has, in fact, been challenged, in brown v IL. Appellate court ruled it unconstitutional once, IL supreme court vacated the ruling because they said the ruling of unconstitutionality was irrelevant as applied. Sent it back down to appellate court, where they ruled it unconstitutional again.

2
JooktzII 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought id's were ray siz emz

2
TenMMShooter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Won't stop until there are public hangings.

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always Booker.

Always Booker.

3
TrumpVoter1 3 points ago +3 / -0

dumbest man in congress. Even dumber than Don Lemon

2
ChynahIzAzzhole 2 points ago +2 / -0

More unconstitutional... communist bullshit from an ILLEGAL Administration.

2
TGNX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Already have one.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

2
DarkRiver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck off Booker.

2
NavySTG 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll then unfund the department that processes the claims. Just like they did in regards to 18 U.S. Code § 925 (c)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/925

Felons are supposed to be able to havd the feds restore their GOD GIVEN RIGHTS (rights?), but the department within the DOJ goes unfunded.

2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

They won't have the votes, and they know they won't. This is just grandstanding.

2
TrumpVoter1 2 points ago +2 / -0

don't count out GOP support for it. This has to be fought and pressure brought on all of them

2
Marshall2 2 points ago +2 / -0

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

1
BelfordBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS ⬇️

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Gunmolester 1 point ago +1 / -0

soo....they want us to get permission from the Govt to use a constitutional right? They KNOW this is unconstitutional ...get fucked!!!