Comments (23)
sorted by:
praise_lord_kek 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dan Carlin's Hardcore History episode of modern political usurping and fraudulent elections will feature prominent figures of our time. Catturd.

May the kek never end.

Al_Swearengen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the Trump Era broke Dan Carlin. He used to do weekly podcasts but as soon as Trump got popular he suddenly stopped and made some vague comments about not understanding the current political climate. Could never gauge whether he was a never Trumper or secretly supported him.

I was a huge follower of his. I know a lot of his beliefs aligned with Trump but I'm sure Trumps demeanor was difficult for him

LongKahn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Usually if you’re not sure about a prominent public figure’s political leanings, they’re based… usually

TheMadManDidItAgain 9 points ago +9 / -0

Holy crap, Catturd is so friggin' funny

I_Love_45-70_Gov 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't verify me


Primed_Native_Texan 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is no Republican Party.

Catholicpede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Speaking of Catturd, was wondering where Hipturd has been. Did he lose one of his 9 lives over in Ukraine virtue signalling?

__I_dindu__nufin_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am catturd actually.

Are you?

TheMadManDidItAgain 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am.


kevinkevin 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. I am Catturdicus!

WillHammer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Catturd ftw

Wolverine 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if Elon is Catturd??

TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is... aren't we all Catturd?

TheGreenDutchman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Elon would know Elon said he's getting rid of checkmarks entirely, except for one account, and thus wouldn't be telling himself to not verify himself... Unless he's trying to hide his identity 🤔

BroadSunlitUplands 2 points ago +3 / -1

His general point is correct (they will go after him relentlessly now), but Elon almost certainly knew that particular story was about to run before he made the ‘i’m voting republican, now watch them smear me in response’ tweet.

The story provoked that tweet, not the other way around. The intent being to discredit the story ahead of time.

Whitespace 2 points ago +3 / -1

Kitler or nothing.

Idontevenknow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, "everyone knows cats can't use twitter, remain unverified bird watcher."

OGPatriotKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok but...

Articles are reporting "The company paid the woman $250k to keep quiet"

So he's leaving out half of the story...

deplorabetty 4 points ago +4 / -0

It could be a case of the actuaries calculating that it was cheaper to throw money at her than fight it out in court. Even if she was lying and Elon would win, the amount of money spent is always the primary consideration.

RulerOfFloppyKingdom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who the fuck cares. If you haven’t realized by now that every single one of these accusations are fake, you might be a retarded faggot.

Scuffers 1 point ago +1 / -0

say yes, prove that this payment ever happened or the so-called NDA exsist, no.

nachosamplerREBORN 1 point ago +1 / -0

...I heard he’s working with the Russians, I think the FBI should investigate. Once they do, it will only support my thought because OMG, the FBI is investigating so it must be something.

crash7863 1 point ago +1 / -0

We could just name the evil, but that would include some of the mods here.