1646
Comments (69)
sorted by:
41
Serulin 41 points ago +42 / -1

Thing is he has Amber as an ex. Who is to say she wont feed the woman info because Musk is now her political enemy

19
blubberdong 19 points ago +21 / -2

No one will believe a woman that shits in a person's bed.

A-well a everybody's heard about the turd T-t-t turd, turd, turd, t-turd's the word

Ok, some idiots will but they're bed shitters as well.

12
qwhyamihere 12 points ago +13 / -1

When out walking if we see dog shit that someone hasn't picked up we yell out ," Amber alert!"

2
maga_mama_757 2 points ago +3 / -1

😂😂

Thanks for the laugh, I needed that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
kr0m 6 points ago +6 / -0

yeah so maybe that's why you should've actually read the comment you replied to. he said what if she feeds the woman info.

meaning, nobody would be asked to believe amber heard. but the woman. who got info from amber heard.

5
SALTYinSeattle 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe the woman feeding the story IS Amber.. Elon calls the "friend of the flight attendant" a far left activist and Actress.. and Amber would have had reason to be on Elon's jet. Elon also said this person "has a serious axe to grind" and "there is more to this story"...

...from the Depp trial we know Amber donates large amounts to the ACLU, and even got Elon to donate in her name.. and there was another piece of information that stuck out to me from this article that seemed to coincide. The "accusing actress friend" said Elon bribed the flight attendant with buying her a horse in exchange for performing a sex act during a massage on his Jet. Amber also said this about Johnny during the trial. Paraphrasing here, "He wanted to buy me lavish gifts, like a Horse.. it was just too much, and over the top".

Not saying this is definitive proof, but it is coincidental.

2
kr0m 2 points ago +2 / -0

i mean i guess it's possible but i think people are just trying to make this connection because she's an actress he just so happened to have been with a while back. LA is FULL of 'far left activists/actresses'. even people who aren't actively employed as an actress or haven't been in anything major, probably refer to themselves as actresses. there's probably tens of thousands of them in LA, if not a solid million.

also he said 'major POLITICAL axe to grind'. which does add a little more context. if it were just 'axe to grind' then it would indicate someone with some personal beef against him. you add the word political and it could be anyone who opposes his politics, which by the way, he only very recently waded into publicly (so, years after being with heard)

and the horse thing doesn't amount to anything in my opinion. probably every famous actor has bought a horse at some point. rich people like horses. a lot of people do.

5
NavySTG 5 points ago +5 / -0

You misread the question.

1
borscht-nazi 1 point ago +5 / -4

Them/they are just retarded.

3
Serulin 3 points ago +4 / -1

No I mean she has seen Elon naked, she could tell the attendant so that she could sound more cridible, such as "elon has a scar on his left thigh" or something

-3
borscht-nazi -3 points ago +2 / -5

No, you just encountered an absolute walnut.

-3
borscht-nazi -3 points ago +2 / -5

Are you retarded?

2
blubberdong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope, it's just a little stutter. I bet you get all kinds of ass with that butter knife wit.

6
MasksAreChildAbuse 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think amber recently came out and has supported Musk if I’m not mistaken. Pretty sure because she knows her career is tanking and she is gonna need a life raft, and Musk is a simp and (speculating) the father of her surrogate kid.

Grimes is similar. Despite being ideologically possessed by the left, she knows where her bread is buttered. She was on the Lex Friedman podcast and she absolutely refused to even comment on innocuous opinions on twitter because her baby daddy is buying it and said seemed genuinely worried if she said the wrong thing her gravy train would be over.

5
DonttrustChina 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because there isn't a woman to feed the info to. It's an "anonymous source", there's no such actual person.

2
fac1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or any other random leftist woman that Elon may have slept with in the past (which he likely has many times, given his fame and fortune).

1
JesusisKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who the fuck is this woman and how did she get in with so many people wtf

24
Zennblack 24 points ago +24 / -0

We already knew that. They always try to MeeToo anyone they wanna take down. They ignore or forgive the real pervs.

10
SeriousTroll 10 points ago +10 / -0

They're always so predictable.

17
Novaz 17 points ago +17 / -0

Oh dang, he's probably got a QR code on his junk. Next level genius.

10
Groundpounder 10 points ago +10 / -0

The accuser’s shot in the dark guess: “He has a sniff ‘Trump Won…Bigly” tattoo on his sniff shaft 😭”

4
spelunking_librator 4 points ago +4 / -0

stop, I can get only so ghey

9
ravioli_king 9 points ago +9 / -0

Or $250k sitting in her bank account (or across 3 bank accounts). Then again, IRS would take $100k of that.

3
BidensPrisonWallet 3 points ago +3 / -0

If truly innocent he should have never settled with her. Makes it tougher to win a narrative battle. If an NDA was part of the deal, he should sue her into poverty.

2
kr0m 2 points ago +2 / -0

if she got the money that way she probably blew it long ago. she allegedly got the money i think clear back in 2018 wasn't it? if shes the kind of whore who lies to get that money it's probably long gone.

8
greatresetmyc0ck 8 points ago +8 / -0

what was this 2 days after he said he's voting republican?

4
kr0m 4 points ago +4 / -0

one day. but if you had read the articles making the accusation, at least the one from insider who broke the story, they claimed they asked him for comment, and he replied asking for more time to provide one. they say they extended their deadline for him to give a comment. which to me, sounds like this probably took at least more than one day.

point being, it seems that he knew about this story coming out before he made that tweet. aaaaaaand it's kind of sad and disappointing that so many people, almost everyone here, failed to notice this let alone point it out. i saw like one person at this entire site mention it.

i'm not saying i believe the accuser, either.

1
anishr 1 point ago +2 / -1

So what’s your point?

2
kr0m 2 points ago +2 / -0

should be obvious. i'm not going to explain it. it's pretty basic and simple.

0
anishr 0 points ago +1 / -1

It isn’t obvious. If he knew about this story before tweeting about voting republican, wtf is the point there?

1
kr0m 1 point ago +1 / -0

he didn't only say he was going to vote republican in that tweet. he also said 'Now, watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold … "

and people here and everywhere are suggesting that his prediction coming true within 24hrs just shows how smart he was for being able to predict it, or how predictable democrats are. but anyone who read the article would've saw that they said they contacted him for comment and he stalled them, so he almost surely knew about this 'dirty trick' before 'predicting it'.

jesus christ thanks for making me spell out something that should've been completely obvious.

0
anishr 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok so you think he just woke up one morning and suddenly decided to vote republican? Obviously not. I’m sure he’s thought about it several times in the past few years. I’m also sure he’s witnessed all of the dirty tricks of the left for the past few years. Do you think the contents of that tweet were in his head days/months/years before he even tweeted it?

Your bullshit argument rests on the assumption that the second he tweeted is the second he knew about the tricks or about voting republican which is just absolutely retarded.

And the reason I asked you to spell it out is because I suspected your argument was bullshit but I still gave you the benefit of the doubt. Seems like your reasoning skills need some work.

0
kr0m 0 points ago +1 / -1

what in the fuck are you smoking man? is your brain really this fucked up?

a) he 'predicts' on twitter that he will be attacked

b) within 24 hours a story about him being inappropriate with some woman comes out

c) people say 'he was right! it happened, just like he said!'

but d) everyone ignores the fact that he already knew the story was going to come out because the article gave him advanced warning merely by asking him for comment.

what in the mother fuck are you talking about you fucking retard? i'm not talking about why he's voting republicans. that has nothing to do with my point. any other person could see what i was getting at. but you.

8
DonttrustChina 8 points ago +8 / -0

There is no accuser. The press just made one up. This source doesn't even exist.

-4
borscht-nazi -4 points ago +1 / -5

But Musk doesn't deny the settlement, or does he?

1
DonttrustChina 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think he's commented one way or the other. He's doubtless settled with a lot of people over a lot of stupid nuisance complaints over the years, he'd be foolish to issue a blanket denial when he doesn't even know when or with whom they're claiming he settled.

5
Miztivin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Okay boys. Time to all get penis tattoos so the left can't black mail you with sexual harrasment.

Lol its actually a good strategy if you get into politics.

4
cherryred 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not a bad idea if you’re a high value target. I’m thinking he made his penis look like a rocket ship. 😎

0
kr0m 0 points ago +1 / -1

ok but,

a) to prove your case you have to show people your dick. you could just as easily put it on your ass or upper thigh

b) they could just claim you got the tattoo after you did the thing. this woman's accusation is supposedly from 2017. so they could just easily say he only got the tattoo at some point in the past FIVE YEARS. did anyone actually read the damn article?

so no lol it's not a good strategy. not when they come up with accusations about shit that supposedly happened 5 to 10 or in cosby's case like 40 years ago.

3
Trumpenproletariat 3 points ago +3 / -0

they could just claim you got the tattoo after you did the thing.

Use a blockchain to add an unforgable timestamp of your tattoo.

2
spelunking_librator 2 points ago +2 / -0

you need to get a receipt and before and after dickpics with a date signed by the tattoo artist

4
Liberals_R_Idiots 4 points ago +4 / -0

Amber Turd enters the chat.

3
OGPatriotKing 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pro Tip : Just hire a hooker who also does massages forget wasting time on regular girls.

1
kr0m 1 point ago +2 / -1

hookers can sue too my dude. and when you're rich, all women see is fucking dollar signs. hell i think that's all they see in general.

3
crackerstacker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't hire leftists.

2
My2Cents 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, his penis has grid fins and 30 raptor engines at the base, your honor.

2
Correndo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Musk, the world's richest person, has repeatedly argued he is being attacked for his political views. This week, he called the Democratic Party a "party of division and hate" while vowing to vote Republican.

Yahoo is editorial trash. "Vowing?" He didn't exactly vow. Fuck the author Cheryl Teh and her bullshit publisher.

1
kr0m 1 point ago +2 / -1

i mean i think the word vow was used correctly. i said he'd only vote republican from now on. the definition for vow that comes up on google:

  1. solemnly promise to do a specified thing.

uh yeah seems to fit to me.

not that i'm trying to defend some yahoo journalist but i think you'll find endless actual legit things to criticize them for if you look harder. but this aint one.

2
Correndo 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://youtu.be/CnxzrX9tNoc

Tune in to the 9:10 mark - " . . . now this election I would."

This is a legitimate criticism. There are many words in our language that are similar but are loaded with different connotations; journalists take advantage of these differences to exagerate and skew reality for rhetorical or income purposes.

Unless there is another video out there of Elon vowing to vote for republicans that I don't know about yet, or maybe a point in the interview I linked where he does (in which case I'll admit I'm wrong), his statement cannot accurately be called a vow. To do so is editorialization.

0
kr0m 0 points ago +1 / -1

nah, i'm not going to look at the video. what i'm going to do is direct you to his twitter account where he just recently said and i quote: "In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party.

But they have become the party of division & hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican."

that's a VOW. it 100% fits the definition. and many many many times over more people have seen that tweet than watched that video. people are going by the tweet, which fits the definition of vow. he specifically said he "will vote republican". that's a vow. sorry dude.

but again there's more than enough to criticize yahoo news over.

2
ChubbyHubby 2 points ago +2 / -0

It had a huge mushroom head. Like a toadstool.

3
kr0m 3 points ago +3 / -0

no no, it's even better (worse) than that. it wasn't 'like a toadstool'

it was 'like that toadstool guy from that super mario kart game on the super nintendo'

or something like that. i mean the whole thing was so fucking ridiculous that i almost think some democrat team of lawyers came up with it and had her say that just because it would create really fucking bizarre headlines that people would associate with trump, the idea that his penis is like a super nintendo character. they were probably laughing their asses off. it's like they're hacking people's brains in these really stupid ways, with their complete control over the media.

2
Bramage 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the correct way to respond. Stand up and say BULLSHIT. Dont cry and wimper. Elon is an Alpha.

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

he literally said to his first wife "I'm the alpha in this relationship"...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

he's been underdog his whole life... it won't work for them

1
Herecomedatpresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

They already have. Tesla was removed from the S&P 500 and the stock has lost 40% of its value.

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Grimes will probably give up the answer. Party first.

1
afro54 1 point ago +1 / -0

I trusted you, elon.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Gunsmith63 1 point ago +2 / -1

Musk changes from Democrat to Republican, and the flight attendants friend comes forth with this story about sexual harassment? Timing is everything.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Huge dong"

0
kr0m 0 points ago +1 / -1

at face value i like this response, but my question would be- why hasn't he confirmed or denied whether the settlement actually took place? and if the settlement did take place, why did he settle, and why didn't he instead ask for the identifying marks BACK THEN?

i'm not saying i believe the accuser but just why? why settle? or if he didn't settle, if there's no actual settlement, why not say that? seems clear there was a settlement, or else he'd be denying that. so why did he settle? why didn't he fight and issue this challenge to the accuser back then?

0
anishr 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because that’s the best way to draw attention to this thing.

You forget something. In 2016 Tesla was mostly in the negative and mostly not profitable. Imagine dealing with public attention on a sexual assault case while trying to make your company profitable.

1
kr0m 1 point ago +1 / -0

ok and i actually do get that. that's a typical reason why people settle. but my real point is actually, why bring up that challenge NOW, when he DIDN'T do it THEN.

like he's doing it now like it proves some kind of point or makes some great statement, but it would have done those things, had he done it THEN. and he didn't. so it just seems like doing it now, years later, kind of rings hollow.

and again i'm not saying i believe the accusations. although i also think a wealthy dude might get used to chicks giving him whatever they want (as trump himself said they do) and forget that not all of them will be willing. but on the other other hand, i dont think the accusations against him are really all that bad anyway.