Well, do you wanna stop it all in its tracks while only losing 30-50%? Drop the grid.
It's a numbers game now. Mass die-offs are fully baked in now. It's really only the ratio of survivors and what groups are allowed to compose the survivors that is still variable.
you people are retarded; no one wants to reduce the population by 90%
NO ONE.
Without all those people they have no one to sell things too, they have no one to control, without anyone to control that power and money is meaningless; fuck you people are dumb as fucking rocks sometimes.
Well, do you wanna stop it all in its tracks while only losing 30-50%? Drop the grid.
It's a numbers game now. Mass die-offs are fully baked in now. It's really only the ratio of survivors and what groups are allowed to compose the survivors that is still variable.
Problem
Reaction
Solution
Problem,
Reaction,
Exacerbation,
Shill
Solution
PRESS (msm)
At some point this war has to get hot.
Soon would be nice.
They never factor in the people who are more than willing to just eat other people to stay alive.
you people are retarded; no one wants to reduce the population by 90%
NO ONE.
Without all those people they have no one to sell things too, they have no one to control, without anyone to control that power and money is meaningless; fuck you people are dumb as fucking rocks sometimes.
We can Argue over percentages but the reality persists. We could lose a couple of billion people and be fine due to automation.
Stick around long enough and you should wise up to the agenda.
there are much easier ways to exterminate 90% of the population
this is just the way that you make money off it and remain at the top while you watch everyone else suffer
just launching all ze nukes will kill everyone, making money off it you have to be trickier
I think exterminating humans has always been quite difficult.
I don't know I mean our friends with the funny hats killed off six million just by talking about it
That they did!