174
Comments (14)
sorted by:
7
FustercluckArmy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well, do you wanna stop it all in its tracks while only losing 30-50%? Drop the grid.

It's a numbers game now. Mass die-offs are fully baked in now. It's really only the ratio of survivors and what groups are allowed to compose the survivors that is still variable.

4
prayinpede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Problem

Reaction

Solution

1
fuckthealphabetsoup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem,

Reaction,

Exacerbation,

Shill

Solution

PRESS (msm)

2
BobSux 2 points ago +2 / -0

At some point this war has to get hot.

1
BeardedNinjaPede 1 point ago +2 / -1

Soon would be nice.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CheeksMcClap 1 point ago +1 / -0

They never factor in the people who are more than willing to just eat other people to stay alive.

0
CantStumpTheTrump 0 points ago +1 / -1

you people are retarded; no one wants to reduce the population by 90%

NO ONE.

Without all those people they have no one to sell things too, they have no one to control, without anyone to control that power and money is meaningless; fuck you people are dumb as fucking rocks sometimes.

2
kek_saved_the_world [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can Argue over percentages but the reality persists. We could lose a couple of billion people and be fine due to automation.

1
BeardedNinjaPede 1 point ago +2 / -1

Stick around long enough and you should wise up to the agenda.

0
Fignugent 0 points ago +3 / -3

there are much easier ways to exterminate 90% of the population

this is just the way that you make money off it and remain at the top while you watch everyone else suffer

just launching all ze nukes will kill everyone, making money off it you have to be trickier

1
SuccessLoveJoy2U 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think exterminating humans has always been quite difficult.

1
becky21k1 1 point ago +4 / -3

I don't know I mean our friends with the funny hats killed off six million just by talking about it

2
SuccessLoveJoy2U 2 points ago +2 / -0

That they did!