1514
Comments (190)
sorted by:
92
fskfsk 92 points ago +92 / -0

You got it backwards. The left is not content to let there be a few states with no crime, constitutional carry, no grooming.

The left won't be satisfied with freedom to do whatever they want in their areas. They also want to control you.

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
15
Jan6Insurrectionist 15 points ago +15 / -0

Exactly this. They don't want that for themselves, they want what we have. And they haven't thought ahead to what happens when they've destroyed it.

24
that_sound 24 points ago +24 / -0

They've had areas (cities, anyway) where they have complete control. And they are shitholes. Blue states are the worst states. Blue cities are hell.

They have had in recent past near total gun control in some cities. It obviously doesn't work, so they demand other states change their gun laws instead of fixing their own problems.

It never has anything to do with whatever they are whining about. Lies. Distraction. Coverup. Everything they do is to destroy western civilization. All of it. Everywhere.

Can't have real communism until everything is communism. Because then you won't have anything to compare it to, and they can't allow their subjects to have someplace to escape to.

12
fskfsk 12 points ago +12 / -0

They need jogger control, not gun control. If you only count White people, the rate of gun crime is very small.

10
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 10 points ago +10 / -0

Exactly. There will never be any unity or even peaceful coexistence with them, and they aren’t going to just leave us alone in our red states either.

2
pogowasright 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree, undeniable truth

6
BetaODork 6 points ago +6 / -0

They’re the modern day union lol. Which of course makes us the new Confederates.

8
fskfsk 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's one reason why there's so anti-confederal flag and generals. It isn't about slavery, it's about people seceding from a government that no longer supports them.

7
BetaODork 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course. All the public school propaganda demonizing the south was not about whether they were wrong or right but because the marxists in education knew long ago that they can’t let the idea of rebelling against an out of control government be popularized. So it turned into well the south hated black people! And the angels in the north had to crusade and chase them down and kill them to save all the poor blacks smh.

10
fskfsk 10 points ago +10 / -0

Some people say the Morrill Tariff was actually a bigger cause of the Civil War than slavery. The North, being primarily industrial, wanted high import and export taxes. The South, being primarily agricultural, wanted low import and export taxes. When the southern states stopped paying tariffs, that was the "justification" for the north to blockade the ports and escalate the war.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Republican POLITICIANS love the Federal spending (which they get to spend). Almost every worker (with a real job) pays more in taxes than the benefits they receive.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
46
Exsultate 46 points ago +46 / -0

The left can never survive without the right. The left is parasitic. It feeds off the bounty that hard working citizens produce. The left creates an underclass and gives them just enough to survive taking from the people who produce. When you break that cycle the left falls apart. Then . . . . slowly over time the left will re-infest like a slow growing cancer. Taking its time while it’s host does not even realize it’s happening.

12
ForwardObserverFIST1 12 points ago +13 / -1

The left is an uncontrolled "feminine" energy that is just dying to be controlled by a masculine energy (the right). But years of government over reach have left the masculine without any power to control the feminine. This is why you see men acting like faggots.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +2 / -1

What happens when you are attacked by a Passive Aggressive Matriarchal clan.

2
ForwardObserverFIST1 2 points ago +2 / -0

The feminine is needed to soften the masculine. There needs to be a balance.

2
Standingoak 2 points ago +2 / -0

All things in moderation.

But doesn't change the source of the EVIL attacking the America IDEA

7
anatidaephobia 7 points ago +12 / -5

The left can never survive without the right. The left is parasitic. It feeds off the bounty that hard working citizens produce.

Hitler did nothing wrong in forcing them to work. "Arbeit macht frei" is how you convert leftist from parasites into functional citizens. All while the rest of society can enjoy the actual worth of their own work. Like for instance, how about a loan for your house that is reduced by 25% for every kid you get. Soon as you have 4 kids you're debt free and fully own your house.

How about a government who's environmental policy is to build beautiful and strong infrastructure that follows the landscape and lasts practically forever, instead of claiming it's your fault "the environment is bad" while taxing the shit out of you as punishment.

Or in general a government that works for you instead of feeding of you.

0
becky21k1 0 points ago +7 / -7

Dang have six kids and you're on your way to a vacation home

7
anatidaephobia 7 points ago +9 / -2

Well to be fair, while the German economy did great under Hitler, I think it stopped at 4 kids. After all no need to exaggerate, 4 kids per family will double the population for every generation in theory.

This was meant to encourage, some people would of course have more kids, others would have less. In the long run this is a great strategy to balance the population and get rid of the old leftist argument claiming illegal immigration is needed for the survival of society. 🤡

1
LogicalPatriot 1 point ago +6 / -5

It did NOT do great. Who the hell told you that?

By 1938, Hitler was worse than Biden on his economic policy and had gone through 2 financial advisers who were telling him to stop spending, they were about to go broke.

When he finally listened, he was on his 3rd advisor and that's why he pushed for War in 1939. It's also why he turned Austrians into slaves where their women were only meant for breeding and the men meant to work in hard labor jobs... it was purely because His economy was SHIT.

No matter how you slice it, Hitler was a fucking Moron on a lot of things.

5
fskfsk 5 points ago +8 / -3

Hitler kicked the (Jewish) bankers out of the country and took control of the monetary system. That's one of the main reasons Germany went from economically crippled to a powerhouse in just a few years.

Most Western countries (like the USA) set up the monetary system in a way that enables huge theft by large bank.

3
Objectivism 3 points ago +4 / -1

You completely avoided his point. Because it's correct.

Hitler's economy was overextended, and lebensraum was justified in reaction to get what he needed - in essence, a renewal of the Roman concept of slavs, expansionist chattel enslavement of the vistula veneti, or Slavic peoples. That's literally why slave and slavic come from the same root.

Hitler believed that the Romans, the Athenians, the Spartans, all of them were of Nordic stock, that the achievements of Rome were achievements of his own, the Aryan people. That's why Roman symbols are all over the place in his iconography.

Anyone who tells you that these policies resulted in a powerhouse is misstating the fact that over half the country was economically involved in the war effort, which was essentially a meat grinder. Their advancements in technology were impressive, but so would any country that decided to forego anything but war.

The gambit was that Hitler could expand fast enough to keep paying for the machine in gains, but internally the economy was an overheated wreck. War is good for production, but because you are literally blowing up your products there's no net gain unless you A. Win and B. Use financing to leverage your spoils against your losses.

At the end of World War II, Germany was facing shortages in food, housing, energy, metals, even fucking cloth. These shortages contributed to the collapse of Germany's currency and development of a black market in which prices were approximately between 20 and 100 times their legal prices.

Yes, kicking out the bankers was a move we could applaud but don't let anyone trick you into thinking Hitler was a brilliant economist. He was a risk taker. If he had just proved everyone what wrong about how to run a country he would have won, but the way he ran a country required expansion and growth to prop up his centrally planned ponsi scheme.

Go read a book.

1
anatidaephobia 1 point ago +6 / -5

Oy vey, how come (((you))) never ended your pathetic war on western society?

-2
trumpman1776 [S] -2 points ago +5 / -7

"everyone who defeats me in an argument with facts is jew!"

man these jews sound like enlightened educated and overall good people

I think I'll side with them over the nazi white europeans actually

3
anatidaephobia 3 points ago +7 / -4

Unless you're one of them, you're the most cucked man alive.

-2
becky21k1 -2 points ago +4 / -6

I was being a little facetious.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
23
MCMLXXXIV 23 points ago +23 / -0

They want to destroy us and drive us from the face of the Earth.

We want to give them part of our country so we can just get back to our boats and RVs and not have to make any tough choices.

This mentality is why we lose.

10
MyNewSkin 10 points ago +10 / -0

Agreed. No quarter when the time comes.

IMHO the infestation of globohomos needs to be eradicated, not contained, so unalienable rights can be restored and civilization can truly advance.

16
Buzzhead 16 points ago +16 / -0

You don’t let cancer stay in any part of your body. We should aim to take everything back. Cancer spreads and letting communists take a few states will undoubtedly spread.

1
DaayTerkErJerbs 1 point ago +1 / -0

You secede. You keep them out of ur area. You create a parallel economy (china model by refusing them access to ur market so ur own get built) you wait till they eat themselves an collapse. You start annexing areas with no voting rights an installed gov voted in by the rest of the country. Once they return to sanity in 50 years you give them voting rights again.

1
Buzzhead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok that could work

-4
trumpman1776 [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

u have to start small

13
RobezTobez 13 points ago +15 / -2

I've said for years that this nation won't survive as a whole, it desperately needs to be broken up.

20
AngryPoop 20 points ago +20 / -0

In my opinion, there's 2 options. Peacefully divide and each faction gets half the nation. Or its another civil war and winner takes all.

I think thats why the left wants to ban guns. They know who will win when it comes down to it

10
1776DeusVult 10 points ago +10 / -0

Except no conservative land owner would ever agree to concede an inch of their god-given land to the degenerate freaks who would completely fail within months anyways

8
Zskills 8 points ago +8 / -0

Correct. Not one fucking acre.

9
Bazzellle 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not one blade a grass. They get nothing and they can eat bugs.

1
EyesSewnShut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not realistic without killing them all.

9
KrellKrypto 9 points ago +11 / -2

They wouldn’t let the right “peacefully divide” the right tries that and mr Lincoln went bat shit crazy and declared war.

And Lincoln is a hero now. ‘No one realizes he was the entire reason the civil war even happened and the confederates were not simply allowed to try their own country.

7
Standingoak 7 points ago +7 / -0

And yet you would give half because you fear the weak.............in the hope that you would gain security ?

5
trumpman1776 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

he who would trade liberty for safety and security something something

1
AngryPoop 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the left doesnt get to keep their property? Rightfully earned property. Theres plenty of people who contribute to society on the left. They arent allowed the freedoms and rights that the right is afforded?

I wasnt saying to divide everything 50/50 like a divorce. If you lived in a red state and wanted to move to blue then you were allowed x amount of days to relocate to something of similar value in the new location... although I can see states like Florida and Texas being overwhlemed

4
Standingoak 4 points ago +4 / -0

In my opinion, there's 2 options. Peacefully divide...

That which is obtained through FRAUD is NOT "Rightfully earned"

Fear of exposure & Truth made Disney squirm , as it does those trying to negotiate a "only 2 options" deal.......

‘Having eyes, do you not see? And having ears, do you not hear?’ And do you not remember?..- Mark 8:18

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem with open civil war is that it won't be two sides lined up fighting. It'll be drive-by-shootings and IEDs. If you see a random person on the street, how do you know what side they're on?

What probably would happen in open civil war is that most politicians and police would be assassination targets. It would be very hard to regain law and order. (And many large US cities already have no-go zones where the police can't do anything.)

-1
KrellKrypto -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why do you think they brought in the masks?

So they can tell friends from foes at a glance

3
SaddleTramp 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no peaceful division you guys are fucking tools.

3
AngryPoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didnt say it was going to happen that way.I listed options.

Does any conservative give two shits about NY or Cali? Adios. Swap out your land for somewhere in the state you want.

7
anatidaephobia 7 points ago +8 / -1

This assumes that the left (parasites) have a right to exist in the first place.

If a fly lands on your food and start eating it, you kill it. Why shouldn't you be allowed to kill a leftist feeding off your work instead of taking care of themselves.

2
NutPsaki 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quack quack

3
Amaroq64 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't give them an inch. We keep the whole thing and they can learn to coexist with us.

1
EyesSewnShut 1 point ago +1 / -0

And let the cycle repeat? No thanks. Eliminate the cancer.

0
Standingoak 0 points ago +1 / -1

Since you don't like the IDEA of America , what idea is better ?

2
anatidaephobia 2 points ago +3 / -1

Every country in the world does at least one thing better than America, and the same thing can be said about every country.

3
Standingoak 3 points ago +3 / -0

True.

So you are saying throw out the Good in search of the Perfect ?

2
anatidaephobia 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's up to individual countries to decide, but generally yes, if another country does one thing better it's worth looking into how to copy that method.

2
Standingoak 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't follow a leader because he does one thing better. You follow because he does most things better even under pressure.

This assumes that the left (parasites) have a right to exist in the first place.

They have a right to exist , you have a right not to feed them. America has a right not to carry EU parasites. Candace has a right to be wrong.

1
corntortilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does Somalia do better than America? Starve?

2
anatidaephobia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lower tax... is that you Mona?

0
RobezTobez 0 points ago +1 / -1

I already said what would be better.

0
Standingoak 0 points ago +1 / -1

I see your only goal is to break up America............says it all I guess.

1
RobezTobez 1 point ago +1 / -0

And thats a problem why? This nation can't coexist with its citizens so before things get to a state of destruction its just better to split things up along ideological lines.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +1 / -0

This nation can't coexist with its citizens....

Correct since your grammatical choice of words means this Government.

...so before things get to a state of destruction its just better to ...

...get rid of the DS criminals running this government.

Thus you only want the hard unreasonable path , rather than solving the corrupt criminal cabal run by the Central Bank Monetary System.

1
RobezTobez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yer living in a fantasy world where you actually think the problem is going to be remedied, fixed or whatever. Its not tho, bro. A legit stolen election happened in 2020 with a fuck ton of evidence to back up an investigation but absolutely no one is going to let the narrative change. Look how awful everything has been since Biden has been put in office. Our government is rotten all the way down to the core and the only thing that is going to fix it is to sever it completely.

Im not sure why its a radical idea to start a national debate about an amicable split; with tensions as high as they are right now I'm sure even the most radical of liberal wouldn't mind us going our separate ways. Bottom line tho: i don't trust anything will get better until we have an overhaul of our election systems. It's designed to be exploited and most definitely has been used that way for decades....there hasn't been a single state to even consider changing the way their citizens vote.....only just how, why, where and when....i want my vote to actually matter and it doesn't because we live in a shithole fucking country run by a cabal of shitheads.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure even the most radical of liberal wouldn't mind us going our separate ways.

Exactly their/your goal. But this is a lie because "the way" is the same as "how".

...there hasn't been a single state to even consider changing the way their citizens vote.

Lots of "shitheads" --agreed.

Mostly they are all corrupt Gangsters owned by the Corrupt Central Bank Monetary System. Kill that system and the worst rats , the rest scurry away.

12
p1smo 12 points ago +12 / -0

There’s no living peacefully alongside people that hate and want to destroy you.

10
Cuttinmuffins 10 points ago +10 / -0

They will never be happy. They would oppress and rob their populations and go to war with there neighbors for more power. They would become bases for the globalists to run operations out of. Sun Tzu said territory is one of the most important parts of the state. You don't give it to your enemy. Look at how Pakistan turned out for India. They thought the same and they created their own enemy at their own doorstep.

3
CaptainButthurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would have ended in bloody civil war had they not broken up. There was no way the Muslims and Hindus could live together without a strongman or 3rd party to rule over them both.

3
KrellKrypto 3 points ago +5 / -2

Muslims can’t live together with anyone that’s not Muslims.

Muslims are clearly the problem, Islam is an a bad religion

2
EyesSewnShut 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're right about women though.

2
CaptainButthurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

They lived with the Hindus for several hundred years under the authority of the British. Muslims will live with others just so long as you are heavy handed

0
KrellKrypto 0 points ago +2 / -2

To be fair I don’t know enough of the history to debate this.

As such I will take what you have said as true.

I still don’t like Islam as a relgion

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
trumpman1776 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's not the same thing

6
GreyKnight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Our areas. Our statues. Our police. Our guns. Our manufacturing. Our economy. Our energy production.

Just because the raise their kids to be sexualized doesn’t mean they all rape their own children. They want ours. They want to take. They want forbidden fruit. They don’t “get things wrong” they lie and get caught...

5
FutureFreemason 5 points ago +5 / -0

give them no land

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Directional 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is this “united we stand, divided we fall” bullshit? Next you’re going to tell me it’s morning in America, and unless we lockdown over monkeypox, the terrorists will have won.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Thun 4 points ago +4 / -0

They wouldn't survive without mootching from the rest of us. Parasites need a host to thrive.

3
AngryPoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck no. We'd have to fund that shit

3
Jack_Dupp 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, they get NOTHING! Fuck em all.

3
TheAttackTitan 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. From sea to shining sea this land is our fucking land. Not one square inch. It belongs to Patriots not communists

3
Uffda 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should just create NO GO ZONES for the freaks. You’re not safe unless you stay in your blue archipelagos.

3
slimcoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can't have it.

They must be crushed.

No escape.

3
almost_retarded 3 points ago +3 / -0

it would only take a state the size of rhode island, since 95% of the fuckers are dead or fake votes to begin with. they'd be so confused once all the freaks arrived, "what do you mean, '95% of my twitter followers dont exist?'"

3
Crimalizeislam 3 points ago +4 / -1

CCP and UN boots will immedeatily be on the ground we concede to the left. What a coward stance to take. I've never liked Candace. She is all talk and would never deign herself to any actual work that would make any change. Top notch grifter.

1
trumpman1776 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

so we go to war

in can't take the american army

neither can china

3
Backslash2099 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let them have California, then when they get rid of all the guns, invade and take over. We'd be home by lunch...

3
Saint_Duck 3 points ago +3 / -0

No reconciliation but also NO states. They don't get states. If they don't like things they can get the fuck out.

2
cajun_robear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Screw keeping them here. Send them all to Ukraine and let Putin deal with them.

2
fuckthealphabetsoup 2 points ago +2 / -0

Candace, that's called Europe; or Canada; or England.

2
talltellmanson 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they didn't need to control everything on a federal level, none of this would be necessary.

Fuck them. They can all move to CA and let's watch the experiment unfold

2
reagan2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

They seem to not mind being crammed into densely populated urban areas so it wouldn't really take a lot of land for them to isolate themselves in. It would be great if we could just have some kind of treaty that would give them some land in exchange for them not trying to groom kids or subject the rest of us to woke shit.

2
wethedownvoted 2 points ago +2 / -0

once the anti-gun nuts are concentrated in one location how are they going to stop someone from taking them over

3
trumpman1776 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

lets

2
arkivx 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. I will not see one inch of USA ground seceded to communist. That is loser talk. This our country. If they want to be communist go to venezuela or china or some other commie eutopia and fuck off outta here.

2
thepalagoon 2 points ago +3 / -1

No its fucking not.

Go read the Gettysburg Address again. And then go to Springfield, IL and make sure you spit on his grave before you just give away the state.

Because you're pretty much confirming that the American Experiment has failed. The answer to "whether this nation, or any nation so conceived, can long endure" is apparently "no."

Our government is corrupt. No doubt.

It no longer is a government of the people by the people and for the people, that's true.

But all this talk of secession is basically capitulation.

What a heinous take completely ignorant of history.

1
MrWWonka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally agree. THEY GET NOTHING.

2
thepalagoon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didnt want to deviate from my main point in the parent comment because it was such an important point--

--but this is kind of what I expect from Candace Owens. She has definitely proven herself to be in it for more than clout and money but she has these outrageous takes meant to stir up shit.

I fucking hate the left but I am smart enough to know that calling your enemies "freaks" is not going to make anything better.

1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go ahead and vote them out then. I’ll wait.

-1
KrellKrypto -1 points ago +1 / -2

I would argue the confederates embodied the idea of america much better then the Union.

The entire United States was really only formed to stop states from waring against each other and protect from European powers.

Now a days there is nothing america about america anymore l, it is no longer 50 states working together but one big fed government pretending to be different states

2
Tranniesarenaaty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck that, no quarter

2
TellMeBoutIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, then we invade 😈

1
krepoisbest 1 point ago +1 / -0

No genders? Unlimited genders!

1
beffers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Candace Owens for president.

1
MrVegan 1 point ago +1 / -0

We’d have to invade to save the kids

1
kfunny91 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neil Howe predicted this would happen just about this time.

1
SboneyLovesGod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also known as federalism. The issue is not in the states, it is in the Federal government.

The people are terrible sinners (myself included) but they are NOT the enemy. The enemy is the political propaganda machine which convinces the masses to vote towards centralizing power.

The solution is not to have secession, the solution is to power down the federal government.

Stop getting distracted by Jews and Blacks, focus on the bad guys in the Fed.

1
use40trackmode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federalism always ends in this problem.

1
SboneyLovesGod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federalism is the limiting of the federal government. Misleading name.

1
FitOfficial 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, how about they can have whatever states they can take.

They're not "getting" anything.

1
TheMadManDidItAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

They would not be united at all. Within a week, they are all blaming each other for their destruction.

1
WeAreTheBadGuys 1 point ago +1 / -0

She still think we can escape. Lol

1
Easzq8 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will refuse to coexist, there can be no example to act as counter evidence to their communist outcome. Just look at Taiwan.

1
MemoryHoleyeO 1 point ago +1 / -0

We could just cross their borders and receive whatever handouts they have left.

1
kfunny91 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm in a blue state. I will happily sell my house to one of these libtards & move to Florida.

1
KOMMISSARofMAGA 1 point ago +2 / -1

I want to secede, but they have to keep Mitch McConnell and Eyepatch McCain.

1
trumpman1776 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

and ted cruz josh hawley and Lindsay grandma

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Kill them instead. Force them to flee.

1
Trump43v3r 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would we waste land on them?

1
MobileDev4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are locust. You can't just expect them to stay put once they suck a place a dry.

1
gaijin_ronin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok. Let all the lefturds move there. Then we turn right around and invade. Wipe out they lefturds and reclaim our land. The remaining shitbirds are treated as the traitors they are

1
kaczan3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because this is not what they want. The Left, just like women, can only sustain themselves by cannibalizing productive, conservative men.

1
CaliPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not giving them an inch; every time someone does, they take a mile.

1
chanel_rions_aquanet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let them have CT.

2
Standingoak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let them go back to England...........No guns , lots of new arrivals thus diversity