3872
2000 mules (media.patriots.win) ⭐   TRUMP WON   ⭐
posted ago by Jackpotsevens ago by Jackpotsevens +3873 / -1
Comments (134)
sorted by:
125
Mercedestech1 125 points ago +125 / -0

Very funny. I think I work with this Brian guy.

82
deleted 82 points ago +82 / -0
75
GlacialSpeed 75 points ago +76 / -1

If you've seen 2k mules but have not seen the state hearings on the 2020 election crimes then you should watch them. And then know that all of that came out before the election was certified. Free and fair elections died in 2020.


Michigan State Senate Hearing on 2020 Election Crimes: https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7461&v=X0-vyw9qbdw&feature=emb_logo

(6:13:00 for Dr Linda Tarver's testimony)


Georgia State Senate Hearing on 2020 Election Crimes: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hRCXUNOwOjw

(33:20 for video of concealed boxes being presented)


Arizona State Legislature Hearing on 2020 Election Crimes: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KXyOtzADUCU


  • Vote counting was halted the night of the election in many swing states with no reason given or fake reasons supplied (water main, just toilet overflow)
  • Hundreds of eyewitnesses gave testimony at multiple states' legislative sessions detailing the election crimes
  • Video evidence showing concealed cases of ballots being pulled out and scanned repeatedly in Georgia after the poll watchers were removed due to the "water main leak".
  • Voters identified as indefinitely confined to illegally receive absentee ballots even though they are young and healthy
  • Ballots for voters under the age of 18 were counted
  • Voters submitted multiple ballots in the same state or across multiple states
  • Voters submitted ballots in states they do not live in
  • Poll watchers illegally removed from polling places for questioning fraudulent vote counting
  • Absentee ballots counted even though voters never requested or filled them out
  • Vote counting machines had overridden vote selection percentages above 60% in some counties, and FAR above normal ranges in many others (Antrim county machine audit)
  • Vote counting machines had the overridden vote selection logs wiped for 2020, but previous years' log data was still there (Antrim county machine audit)
  • ANTRIM COUNTY VOTING MACHINE AUDITED
  • 2000 Mules: Thousands of individuals repeatedly dropped off multiple ballots into drop boxes violating the law. The total number of these ballots alone is enough to shift the result of the election.

The 2020 Election Was A Complete Fraud

31
Darkheartisland 31 points ago +31 / -0

That's not even counting dominion and the treason that Mike "Faggot" Pence committed.

6
GodHatesBiden 6 points ago +7 / -1

The vice presidency is not a real job, its not a real office, its a closet where they keep a spare.

Anyone who suggests Pence or any VP is anything more than Vanna White misunderstands what the fuck a VP.

7
Darkheartisland 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pence sure had a lot of power to fuck us over on 1/6

2
GodHatesBiden 2 points ago +4 / -2

He didn't have any power, though. People were like "do something!" and he understood he was basically a mannequin trump used to convince Evangelicals he wasn't a totally degenerate lifelong NYC democrat (which...in a lot of ways...he was with multiple wives and porn star affairs and supporting abortion from 1945-2014...which idgaf about tbh).

He had about as much power as his faggot rabbit.

1
PissOffPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gas sure was cheap though. Lets do that again.

10
Marshall2 10 points ago +10 / -0

And some of us knew it immediately. And we've been called doomers and gloomers.

7
Filthy_MALE 7 points ago +7 / -0

Those that know, already know.

Those that don’t know will soon find out.

But the people who deny it still to this day are the true agitators. Don’t converse with them, undermine them in any anonymous way possible instead.

We throw around traitor like it’s no tomorrow, but anybody that denies there were at least some irregularities in that horrible November of 2020? Do whatever you want to them.

3
UncleStepDaddy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for typing all that out btw; I saved myself a copy of it on pdf!

2
Shockthemonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

keep reminding us of the massive fraud

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I also did this. The company fell apart lol. Engineering team of 14 people,
Only 1 remains today and he's not even an engineer.

1
jimboonie 1 point ago +2 / -1

I do too, but his name is Kevin at my place.

1
RogueLeaderX 1 point ago +2 / -1

You clearly work with intellectual people. That is rare these days.

80
deleted 80 points ago +80 / -0
30
TheDespotofCartoons 30 points ago +30 / -0

Stop it! Not only is that funny, but it's unfair to compare that uggo to a cute little mule!

17
Geralt_of_Rivia1 17 points ago +18 / -1

Mules are awesome animals.

I hate how people measure animal intelligence - the general standard is trainability. Mules are smart because they know what to do Instinctually - which is why the mule trips to the grand canyon are a thing. You don't do it on horseback because horses will do exactly what you tell them to do - tell a horse to run off the side of a cliff and it runs off of the side of a cliff.

But apparently that makes horses smarter according to most metrics

10
TheDespotofCartoons 10 points ago +10 / -0

I know, right? Donkeys, mules, horses, hinnies, I like 'em all!

Unfortunate that donkeys are the symbol of the bad guys. They should just choose a demon and be done with it.

2
Geralt_of_Rivia1 2 points ago +5 / -3

Not that much of a fan of horses, honestly. I like donkeys, I like hinnys, I like mules, but horses just tend to be too stupid without the benefits.

3
bicentennial_john 3 points ago +3 / -0

i like alpacas

5
BigMikesSwingingCock 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's more of a jackass, heehaw. Fitting for her party.

5
EDM4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

I believe in the truth and although I hate her as a person, she does have great tits.

3
TheDespotofCartoons 3 points ago +3 / -0

No argument there!

3
DixMcCoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

no worries, she'll probably cut them off at some point

7
SecondProtectsFirst 7 points ago +7 / -0

Bro are you hitting on her?

6
ThomasJ 6 points ago +7 / -1

AOC recently said we should cut funding to Israel. She finally said something based for once

6
2008RonPaul2012 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's par for the course. Of course she wants to take that funding and import all of Palestine instead.

2
ThomasJ 2 points ago +4 / -2

Not that I like any funding, but if I were to choose Palestine or whatever sand country. The top 5 countries we fund are for Israel’s interests

4
RealRedneck 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're just jealous she's getting married. 🤣

73
Keiichi81 73 points ago +73 / -0

"I refuse to look at the evidence, therefor there's no evidence."

26
Shalomtoyou 26 points ago +26 / -0

That's what worked for the courts. The judges refused to look at the evidence, so they say Trump lost.

5
TrumpoWon2020 5 points ago +6 / -1

The courts are corrupt and not valid. Nothing government is valid any more.

2
Scutigera_coleoptrat 2 points ago +2 / -0

laches! standing!

16
BigMikesSwingingCock 16 points ago +16 / -0

"I'm going to need a peer reviewed article on CNN as a source before I'll think about it. Checkmate drumphtard!"

-leftists

8
Snack_Destroyer 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Peers I approve of"

1
TrumpoWon2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftists will never listen. The government will line them up in front of a ditch and shoot them and they'll still be saying "REEEE, BUT I WAS A GOOD BOY!!!"

12
Dave___Smith 12 points ago +12 / -0

I showed my one friend so much evidence his only response to me was “prove it in court 😂🤣😂😹😂”

1
TrumpoWon2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope you stopped being his friend

1
TrumpShouldBeKing 1 point ago +3 / -2

Well he has a good point. Is all the evidence strong enough to survive scrutiny? Like beyond reasonable doubt?

7
Dave___Smith 7 points ago +7 / -0

In my opinion yes. But the courts are corrupt and won’t even take the case.. like.. we’re trying to prove it in court.

And he didn’t say it in good faith.. he said it in a “you’ve stumped me, I can’t explain or defend this.. but you lost hahahahahah” manner

4
Jackpotsevens [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's like playing chess with a pigeon no matter how good you do It will knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strutt around like it won.

1
use40trackmode 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've had better behaved pigeons.

3
TrumpoWon2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is fucking video of them scanning fake ballots. There is court testimony of truck drivers paid to drive hundreds of thousands of fake ballots to other states.

That's EVIDENCE you dumb fuck head.

1
TrumpShouldBeKing 1 point ago +2 / -1

Video of scanning ballots or video of scanning fake ballots? I've seen videos like that, but in every case there was some dumb fuck head like you saying those ballots were fake, without providing any evidence of that specific part. A video of people scanning ballots is not evidence unless you can proof those ballots are fake you dumb fuck head.

That problem with that truck driver is that he couldn't back his story up with anything. Not his boss confirming what he said, no papers, no pictures, nothing, and his truck mysteriously "went missing"? Really? That's not even touching the huge history of mental issues of this guy.

It's like saying 5y old saying the earth looks a bit flat, and then claiming: "there is evidence of a flat earth". Fuck off.

It doesn't work like that...you can't say that's evidence unless you're a dumb fuck head.

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

The video showed them scanning the same ballots 3+ times. Doesn't matter If they're fake or not. They literally load a bunch, then walk to the exit side of the machine, grab them, then RE LOAD THEM. And they do that over 3 times.

Explain that you faggot.

0
TrumpShouldBeKing 0 points ago +1 / -1

First of all, they did a hand recount and it matched. That alone should tell us that something is wrong with that story and you're a fag for taking it at face value.

What do you even know about how that scanning works? Maybe there was a scan error and it needed to be done again, maybe they needed to scan both sides. What's the context?

Plus, all scans are saved. Shouldn't it be easy to find those duplicates? Hint: they haven't.

Explain all the details fag.

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

A "hand recount" is just counting the fraudulent votes. It doesn't do anything. A billion illegal votes can be "re counted".

You ignore the fact that there is a video of liberals cheating. And now we have gps data in 2000 mules proving more fraud.

2
GodHatesBiden 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dinesh needs to explain how they filtered out UPS drivers, mailmen, FedEx drivers, as they would be visiting office parks with all the non-profits and doing work by population centers with ballot boxes.

Its a glaring fucking hole in an otherwise slickly produced film.

34
Dylan_da_Spider 34 points ago +34 / -0

2020 wAs tHE moSt SECUrE ElEctiOn eVeR, now stop with all this evidence, its making us look bad.

-The Democrats

26
Sleepwoker2 26 points ago +26 / -0

This is the absolute perfect summation of why rational conservatives have such a hard time dealing with leftists. By definition, rational people expect reason and evidence to be the tools of knowledge. We always end up on the defensive because there is no amount of evidence, no amount of explanation, no amount of argument that can make a lunatic rational.

6
CNNdotWin 6 points ago +6 / -0

which is why in the second panel he should have just punched the leftist and walked off

6
CaptainN 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can only do it for so long. My patience runs out and I get frustrated. So...I stopped trying.

Nobody listens. Nobody thinks critically.

2
plutocedar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do "blank stare" until whichever idiot in front of me is done talking politics that they heard on the news

3
when_we_win_remember 3 points ago +3 / -0

The proof is that prior to the 2020 election it was Democrats claiming the elections system was vulnerable and can't be trusted. Nothing changed, so which is it? I think it is that the elections system has never been trustworthy.

1
libertyforall69 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wait until you try to explain that water is level and not round.

1
Sleepwoker2 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why it's a big sheet when it rains /s

24
least_counties_ever 24 points ago +24 / -0

"It doesn't look like anything to me."

7
Whimpy13 7 points ago +7 / -0

..."since I just stabbed myself in the eyes with two pencils."

6
sully 6 points ago +6 / -0

"it was deBOONKED by snopes and CNN you bigot racist xenotransphobe"

3
exarch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn’t it amazing how well the NPC meme describes them?

13
BoatingAccident 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yeah. Pretty much.

Except the meme left this out:

"THEN WHY HAVE SO MANY JUDGES REFUSED TO HEAR THE CASES? MUST BE BECAUSE THEY ARE BULLSHIT CHARGES AMIRITE?"

4
SlumberBalu 4 points ago +4 / -0

No because they are deep stated pedophiles with to much leverages against them! Or money! Easy libtSrd!

5
BoatingAccident 5 points ago +5 / -0

"you expect me to believe that the entire legal system is corrupt? Every judge? Even the many Trump ones?" Fuck you Brian

12
laylahege 12 points ago +12 / -0

Tim pool isn't wearing his Beanie in this.

10
icehole3 10 points ago +10 / -0

My Liberal friend would've wanted 2 videos.

5
TheWorldsOnBathSalts 5 points ago +5 / -0

“Wait, it’s not on LaserDisc?”

9
Ienjoywearingcrocs 9 points ago +9 / -0

FUCK JOE BIDEN

8
Filthy_MALE 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don’t humor these people when they ask for “Proof?”

They are trying to waste your time and piss you off.

7
UnitedStatesofSmash 7 points ago +7 / -0

One day you will all realize that the Left does not give a fuck about facts. You cannot argue with them. You cannot convince them. They hate you, and they will continue to do so even after they've killed you and your family. There is only one way to handle a group of people like that, and no one here wants to admit it.

2
American_Odin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based

5
stratocaster_patriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jay Inslee did the same thing with CHAZ. He was told commies took over Capital Hill and he said he'd wait until credible sources told him, "not that you aren't credible" he then said. The local media was telling him. He never acknowledged to this day that commies took over the biggest city in his state.

5
RedPillMAGALegend 5 points ago +5 / -0

When does the sequel “2000 Arrests” come out? Asking for many frens

5
wblboo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Meanwhile, we all sit on our duffs while McConnell and Schumer are starting WWIII a nuclear holocaust by going against a treaty we signed in good faith not to expand NATO. They think they can disregard the sworn word of our fathers.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/28/candace-owens/fact-checking-claims-nato-us-broke-agreement-again/

https://www.rt.com/news/549921-nato-expansion-russia-document/

https://www.yahoo.com/news/schumer-mcconnell-pressing-administration-rush-141842778.html https://www.ksl.com/article/50410147/republicans-join-democrats-in-backing-nato-expansion-despite-rising-nationalism

If anyone knows where their radiation-proof bunkers are located, please post the address or GPS coordinates everywhere - so we can make yard signs or stickers we can put on gas pumps.

5
PatriotBh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Leftists hate order and organization. The conversation will rarely get to a debate, much less open minded viewing of evidence.

5
ManyDirt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Someone was asking me what sources 2000 mules had. It had no sources... Like it is the source. Video evidence. That's primary evidence, you don't need sources when it is a source.

-2
BroadSunlitUplands -2 points ago +1 / -3

Except there’s actually no video evidence at all in 2000 Mules showing individuals visiting multiple drop boxes, which is the entire premise of the documentary and their theory of how the election was stolen.

All of the claims made are based on their interpretation of the tracking data, which the viewer is then expected to take on faith.

It spends so long on ambiguous footage of people wearing gloves or taking photos of themselves voting, precisely because they don’t have the video footage necessary to corroborate their claims about thousands of individuals visiting many different drop boxes.

3
SaltArmyCaptain 3 points ago +3 / -0

You didn't actually watch 2000 mules did you? You're as bad as the Karen senator in this video, it's been "DEBOOOOONKED!"

0
BroadSunlitUplands 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes I watched it and what I said is correct. Now what?

1
bagoflime 1 point ago +2 / -1

Dinesh has two pictures of the same guy at the same box different days each time taking more than just a few ballots.

I'd like TTV to hurry the fuck up and dump their data. They apparently have quite a bit so I'd like them to just start chunking it up into torrents and letting it rip.

Fuck if they really wanted to they could grift and sell hard drives of it. I don't really care - just let us have it. The longer they go not producing it the more tick tock it gets.

-2
BroadSunlitUplands -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah I saw that, where he tried to pass it off as two different drop boxes, which was either dishonesty or just being sloppy in what he’s claiming. Neither is good when his case amounts to ‘trust me bro’. Same guy visiting the same drop box twice is still more compelling than ‘lady wears gloves’ or ‘man takes photo’.

It just doesn’t add up to me that with 54,000 people minimum to pick from (who visited 5 or more drop boxes according to them) they apparently can’t find any who visited two on camera. If you’re making this documentary, that seems like priority one evidence to find, so I can’t believe they haven’t put a huge amount of effort into trying to find that. And the tracking data should tell them exactly when and where to look - it’s not like they need to trawl through endless footage hoping to spot the same person twice.

Could it be they’re worried that releasing the data would undermine their current grift, rather than prove what they claim in the documentary?

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see the difference between dumping 20 ballots in one box and 10 in 2 boxes. In theory, you could be dumping them off for 20 relatives. In practice, that's probably bullshit. If no one is going to follow up with the actual people, there can be no proof. Some pressure would need to be applied by law enforcement to the mules and to the nonprofits and see if you can get someone to throw someone else under the bus.

0
BroadSunlitUplands 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hypothetically I agree with you, but from memory I don’t think 2000 Mules even claims to show someone dropping off 20 ballots in one box, and that isn’t the theory being put forward in the documentary.

The theory they propose in the documentary is that ‘mules’ are dropping off a few ballots at a time but at many different drop boxes (ie. they accept it’s plausible somebody could legally drop off a few ballots once, but there’s no legal explanation for somebody doing it many times over).

They claim to have the evidence which proves their theory, and then proceed to share none of that evidence with the viewer, instead pivoting to showing the viewer clips of any vaguely suspicious activity at drop boxes. The whole time they’re showing me this random shit I’m thinking ‘so you’re going to show me evidence of what you’re actually talking about soon, right?’, and they never do.

If they really do have the evidence proving their theory, that’s great and I hope it’s investigated, but that’s no use to me as a viewer of the documentary. All I have to go on is them telling me to take their word for it.

4
winsome 4 points ago +4 / -0

Eff Stuart Varney.

4
FLIBS 4 points ago +4 / -0

The left doesn't believe in evidence, just press releases....

3
FamburgerHelper 3 points ago +3 / -0

I had a tiff with a friend this morning, even though he voted for Trump, he absolutely refuses to believe there was anything hinky about the 2020 election. I offered to show him 2000 Mules and he refused, so I told him to go fly a kite. He "trusts" that fat Bushie Boy Barr, who, practically moments after the elcection, said there was no fraud. It's so frustrating, I can't stand it. How can you stay friends with someone who is so stubborn and won't see what's right in front of their face? Anyway, after I cancelled dinner plans tonight, I sent him this cartoon. Doubt it'll make a difference. I got no time for ostriches with their heads in the sand.

3
bigbrownbeaver 3 points ago +3 / -0

No matter the amount of evidence. The other guy will never admit it.

2
KekistanPM 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even if you gave someone solid proof and the actual perps confessed to their face, they still would pretend to not believe it. Anything to keep their Dem in office.

2
IamBACK 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great Meme!!!!

But in real life they would have pretended they had something important to do and walked away after the first piece of evidence. lololol

2
WowStrongWinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

But but iTs NoT wIdEsPrEaD

2
American_Rasputin81 2 points ago +3 / -1

This ☝

2
TheLeftIsAntiRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Fuck you, Supreme Court."

2
PrairieRaine88 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to know a guy named Brian, he ran off to Maine, knocked up an Autistic chick, and is now a deadbeat dad apparently.

2
ReformedSJW 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm fairly certain they have scripts or something. It always involves making your point in the form of a question like a passive agressive little bitch.

After I started writing this I did a search for "how to help a friend who believes the big lie" or something and found this: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-mind/202111/the-definitive-guide-helping-people-get-past-the-big-lie

So yeah, scripts, and I guarantee there's hundreds more just like it in all the left wing schlock. Read up if you don't mind giving clicks to faggots, or search for another one, they'll all be pretty much the same. It can help to see how they think.

2
Songofsixpence 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for this info. I like how they claim an "overabundance of facts wont help". LOL!

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for fixing it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
45ForEver2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lawl if they thought they were 100% sure of their accusations they would show the people faces.

1
belil569 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly why 2000 mules is useless. It won't change any minds. It's always been there and seen by those that care.

1
Excelsius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look folks there's a good reason why they're not looking at the evidence and it should've been clear when Trump had that phonecall with the Georgia Secretary of State.

Both the dems and the scumbag reps helped Biden win the election and that's why the reps are so silent on voter fraud. All of the reps that still pretend that there was no voter fraud should be outed.

1
Gans 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a comic of why my brother won't talk to me anymore.

1
__I_dindu__nufin_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excellent

1
Marshall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean evidence that made it past the Judicial Gatekeepers who were paid off to keep it out of the system...

1
TheSuperStableGenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've watched about half of it already, while compelling, the issue I have is they never show the same person they claim visited 20, 30, 50 drop boxes ever at more than 1 drop box when most of these boxes are under surveillance.. that really jumped out at me. All these people on video but they can never find them twice at different boxes that's really odd. At the end of the day there's no way a president, no matter who, wins Florida, Ohio and 99% of the bellwether counties and loses... the statistical chances of that happening are less likely than you winning both the PowerBall and megamillions in the same week.

1
TrumpFan26 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was expecting a panel of "Where is the evidence?..Here it is.....Throws evidence away.....You see?there is no evidence"

1
Crucial8GB 1 point ago +1 / -0

I posted a comment on John Oliver attacking Tucker Carlson saying something like his handlers told him to attack Carlson and I questioned by a couple people asking who are his handlers. As soon I respond with HBO -> Time Warner -> AT&T then post the largest shareholders like Blackrock and Vanguard then STFU.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OwlHoller 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is awesome. A+ fodder for the meme cannon.

1
idrago01 1 point ago +1 / -0

i think brian is my brother

1
Idontevenknow 1 point ago +1 / -0

So all those signed affidavits, and not one has been prosecuted for lying? Interesting....

1
UncleStepDaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

That last frame should read: Fuck you, you misogynistic, homophobic, bigoted xenophobe!!

1
Liberals_R_Idiots 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love it.

1
GodHatesBiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has Dinesh explained how they filtered, if they did at all, UPS/USPS/FEDEX drivers? They go on the same routes and f

Thats a glaring fucking hole in their documentary which I paid to watch and watched twice.

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trevor hastily gets in his car, drives off angrily, swerves to miss a skunk that God put into the road, hits a tree, immediately dies on impact

God wins

Then God sends a different Trevor to be Brian's replacement friend

1
Keep_on_winning_kag 1 point ago +1 / -0

My friend Brian will like this.