2526
Comments (169)
sorted by:
92
ItsBigLeagueNotBigly 92 points ago +92 / -0

A new ice age, global warming, and now climate change. It's about as real as the scamdemic.

27
yunarukami 27 points ago +29 / -2

This summer is a lot cooler compared to before.

21
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 21 points ago +21 / -0

Where the hell are you? Last year was nice, this year it’s fucking awful.

7
yunarukami 7 points ago +8 / -1

California

7
TheDTOMDon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Usually if we get it easy this late in the year we'll get an indian summer that goes into early november.

1
iorek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good news considering heating prices.

4
FetalTransition 4 points ago +4 / -0

Western Washington here. It's been high 60's to mid 70's max. Saturday will be the first day we touch 80° this year.

3
StrawberryDoughnut 3 points ago +3 / -0

yup, snohomish county here... it has been cold and shitty.

4
BloodElfSupporter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awful as in..? Too hot or too cold? So far it doesn’t feel that hot, in fact today was pretty cool. I’m in NJ

2
Husky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meanwhile, in Florida, I'm dying outside trying to add a window unit in addition to our central AC because it's been so hot for the past few weeks a(nd not cooling off at night) that the central AC can't keep up.

I know it's Florida but damn, this is a tough Summer. (global warming is still bullshit)

5
Slingy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Go gently wash your condenser coils if you can. Not a lot of water pressure since they’re tiny metal fins. Once you see the water running clearer, move to a different spot.

4
Scot 4 points ago +4 / -0

This^^^^

I have industrial units for the electrical rooms at my mill and a dusty environment. I have to wash them out every couple weeks with a 1" high pressure hose.

Just spray it straight on, not at an angle, and be more careful with a home unit. You don't want to bend the fins.

1
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too hot. 102 predicted today.

1
Elencher 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that's the problem with people talking about climate. Climate is not a human-scale phenomenon, it's a global scale phenomenon. Climate is global trends on human lifespan timelines. Anybody who brings up any personal anecdata in a conversation on climate doesn't understand the core concept.

1
Friar_Pede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good I'm ready for the blackouts

6
Isolated_Patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, you guys have summer?

4
RedditIs4Retards 4 points ago +4 / -0

So far I don't either

4
Moose_Antlers 4 points ago +4 / -0

Come on down south of the Mason-Dixon line. 100°F+ weather right now.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
5
Bullgod 5 points ago +5 / -0

Alaska has summer. Already had a few 80F plus, days.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Bullgod 1 point ago +2 / -1

You mean the north of the Arctic Circle...

5
Deplorable_Yankee 5 points ago +5 / -0

No way! Your weather is different this year! Same with mine! Must be the world is ending in 12 years.

3
LookFatty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Freezing in Maine this summer. No joke

2
Deplorable_Yankee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Summer just started

2
JohnnyWolverine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because leftists haven't set cities on fire yet?

4
Gnometard 4 points ago +13 / -9

Ice ages are real. Don't be a retard because you can only be "anti them", if you're simply anti them you need no opinions nor a platform. We've got enough dumb people in the world.

Man made climate change is bullshit, don't conflate that with hundreds of thousands of years of the climate changing naturally

15
ItsBigLeagueNotBigly 15 points ago +15 / -0

You missed the point. Liberals were saying we're going into a new ice age back in the 70s.

5
PaulieM91 5 points ago +7 / -2

Fill a cup half ice half water, wait for ice to melt and measure the change

6
BasedAttorney 6 points ago +7 / -1

Man made climate change is bs and a scam but this point doesn't work and they can easily refute it to make us look bad and further their lies.

You have to account for all the ice and snow on land and mountains and stuff, not just icebergs. A better analogy would be hold an ice cube over a glass of water and watch it melt and then measure. The level would go up.

2
Husky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aaand more heat, more evaporation, lifting it in the air, lowering water again.

Its almost like.. a cycle.. of precipitation... Fascinating

1
JonathanE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plus the desalination could affect the gulf stream, which would in turn affect the weather patterns.

6
TheDTOMDon 6 points ago +6 / -0

floating ice is racist

2
Moose_Antlers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but if the ice is over land and it melts, your experiment will have a different result. (ie worry about the Antarctic, not the Arctic)

Should we worry about that? Well, Greenland's glacial mass is net accumulating by a several gigatons per year. The hyperventilators will jump up and down screaming about the West Antarctic ice sheet (~10% of the total mass of the Antarctic ice, most of which is floating on the ocean and meaningless. They won't tell you that the Eastern sheet, which accounts for ~90% of the mass, is gaining more ice than is being lost by both sheets there as well.

For all our global warming, neither of the world's biggest glaciers are in any danger of melting or causing catastrophic anything.

1
Winning_Bigly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best way to explain it is to say that you have to displace your weight in water to float.

2
Kdiddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ice age… lol. Worldwide flood, yes.

This Earth being millions/billions of years old was the first lie I realized I was taught growing up.

At this point in my life it is absolutely laughable when I hear people talk like this.

Think of the stolen election evidence. There is so much, yet nothing is done.

There is mountains more for a young Earth that is completely ignored.

These people hate anything that would point someone to the creator God. Ken Ham from Answers in Genesis has been sounding this alarm since the 80’s. No one cares - or really - not enough care.

Jump in here at minute 16: https://youtu.be/yhSpoBbBhlo

3
cyberrigger 3 points ago +3 / -0

not only is the sea rising --- the land is rising too in lockstep....

2
Horkers4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

But if the land gets too floaty it might capsize like Guam!

39
MustafaJones 39 points ago +39 / -0

Every single major climate change prediction has been completely wrong, from the time they predicted 12 years to irreparable damage during Nixon’s tenure, to Al Gore predicting polar bears going extinct by 2015 (of which there are now too many), to Antarctic ice melts (revealed to be caused by subterranean magma).

The only person to be more consistently wrong than climate scientists is Fauci.

9
BloodElfSupporter 9 points ago +9 / -0

But they will say it’s because THEY took the initiatives to reduce carbon footprint, to preserve the wildlife etc. that we are not suffering those predictions, and therefore we have to continue the progress.

5
captain-shitpost 5 points ago +5 / -0

associated press removed the date from this article on the live version https://archive.ph/9MWge

shortly after, the UN founded the IPCC, which has just made repeatedly debunked prophecies over and over again.

the people pushing this shit are a mix of doomsday cult fanatics, and totalitarians looking for any excuse to browbeat people into ceding authority. they wrap it up as science when it is far from anything actually scientific.

3
BigMikesSwingingCock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fauci is deliberately wrong. He's created more viruses than you could imagine. He's a deceiver. He's a monster. Pure evil.

Man made climate change is a myth. The only thing made is lies to deceive the public.

2
GoldenEarz 2 points ago +2 / -0

In Canada 2001 the govt mailed every household a pamphlet of dire climate predictions to justify their costly new policies. 20 years later, every one of their predictions failed, 0% came true:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR6wds_ly2s

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
29
SmartGuy 29 points ago +33 / -4

Looks like it went down

26
Wrexxis780 26 points ago +26 / -0

"So its not exactly the same over 140 years? CLOIMATE CHANGE!!!!!!!"

9
rayrax 9 points ago +11 / -2

It's the Kalergi Plan.. you should read what he wrote..

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7qyY7doPR4NT/

18
Meme_war_ii_vet 18 points ago +18 / -0

Inb4 tides

3
TheDTOMDon 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would be a golden opportunity to poll some college liberals on tides. I'd bet a great majority would have no idea the sea level changes several feet per day.

6
Cheesemaker 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, would changing sea levels threaten to tip over Guam?

2
DarkDrai 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, only overpopulation can do that.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhh...uhhhh...uhhhh...needs more navy.

2
Zepp87 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gore kinda did that in an inconvenient truth.

Kilimanjaro in summer vs winter. Said it was global warming.

2
Moose_Antlers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Both images taken at high tide. It's apples to apples. I've seen the non-meme debate on this one.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
8
TangerineShine 8 points ago +8 / -0

Absolutely. BURN MORE COAL!!!!!

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks Putin.

1
Axiom502 1 point ago +3 / -2

Madison Gesioto has entered the chat

1
AcAirman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Boobies

6
captain-shitpost 6 points ago +6 / -0

for years, these sociopaths have been trying to pass off land subsidence in florida and mexico as climate change.

the actual surface of the earth in that region is sinking, because it's all built up on porous limestone rock. over time, it's been compacting. and areas that are getting more building (especially south florida) are getting more compaction faster. miami beach is especially bad because the barrier island was manufactured, not natural, and they did it using the cheapest shitty limestone they could find. they've got buildings that have sunk multiple feet in the last 50 years.

but no, this is proof of climate change to the fanatics. and because climate change is real, we need communism immediately. they're just totalitarians looking for ANY excuse for people to cede power to them.

5
Hanging_Chad 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's just the tectonic plate shifting, bigot

25
KeyRepair 25 points ago +25 / -0

At risk of sounding contrarian, were both photos taken at the same point in tide?

12
Grond999 12 points ago +12 / -0

The actual tide gauge for Fort Denison (in photo) shows a 6 cm rise over a century as I recall. Which is nothing.

13
80960KA 13 points ago +13 / -0

Tide gauges pretty much all show slow linear changes in level over time from tectonics. What they don't show is rapid rises in level from "global warming".

4
Grond999 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, there is debate over the tectonics vs Fort Denison tide gauge record. Various dynamic. Sweden is rising post glacier melt for example.

3
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 3 points ago +3 / -0

High tide mark matters. Water level is dependent on time. The high tide mark seems higher on the new photo.

13
MythArcana 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well, see, the water level actually went up about 60 feet, but then flat earth tilted and spilled some of the water off the side. Trust the science, bigots!

6
Standardwhiteboy 6 points ago +6 / -0

I love flat earth jokes.

10
Smashley 10 points ago +10 / -0

My aunt lives on one the canals on Little Torch key in key west at all of 4 feet elevation and has for 50 years. No change.

6
RootLevelPrivilege 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yeah, but sea level rise isn't happening in Florida because DeSantis is so right wing that science won't even go there.

7
Bastard 7 points ago +8 / -1

To be fair, those pics could have been taken at the same tidal conditions. I'm sure most days that building is completely submerged. /s

5
NullifyAndSecede 5 points ago +7 / -2

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.

― H.L. Mencken

5
BigCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

just imagine 100 years from now though.. it will probably be ten times that.

1
RootLevelPrivilege 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like to think about what people 100 years from now are going to say when they look at how the population today is propagandized with the climate kookery. It will be so funny.

2
Mane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will be no different from today. We accept whatever historical story they teach us.

If the wrong side wins, then all this propaganda will remain as truth. Perhaps they managed to reverse it when Soviet Union 2.0 was launched in North America.

2
RootLevelPrivilege 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess that would be it, that they "saved the planet", it would have otherwise happened or something.

I used to wonder if, without Trump coming in and upsetting the plan, they were basically going to spin history that Obama saved the world from the rising sea levels with the Paris Climate Accord and all that stuff. The one/two punch of the first black president / first woman president saves the planet. I would bet that is what they had in mind.

We accept whatever historical story they teach us.

Speak for yourself, man, not me.

1
Mane 1 point ago +1 / -0

In five decades, the Capital will have been destroyed on Jan 6 in the history books.

Much in the way entire genocides were written into World War II to make the group that went against the global banking cartels the bad guys until the end of time.

2
RootLevelPrivilege 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wasn't sure how it would go over. Some people here know the truth and some will not hear at all. I like to leave references sprinkled around here, though, just as you are saying about 1/6 here.

1
Mane 1 point ago +1 / -0

That gives me hope. Thanks, dude!

4
MyOathNeverEnded 4 points ago +4 / -0

I shared that and Meta fact checked me. LOL

3
malooch 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the sea levels were rising Barry Soetoro wouldn’t have a 15 million dollar mansion in Martha’s fucking Vineyard and building another on the beach in hawaii

1
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not relevant for 100 years though. They know they'll be long gone and ripped off tax payers for millions more long before it matters.

1
RootLevelPrivilege 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shhhhh, they don't like when you notice them.

3
Vlad_The_Impaler 3 points ago +3 / -0

is that photograph truly 140 years old?

When were the first black and white photographs invented?

3
TheMrStone 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have photos of Presidents Andrew Jackson (1767-1845) and J.Q. Adams (1767-1848). Photography dates back to 1826, the very first photo is actually viewable online, though it's of such poor quality it's impossible to accurately discern anything in the image itself.

3
VoteThing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone interested in this topic, please watch the videos of Tony Heller. Over and over, Heller gives examples of media lies, side-by-side with the real evidence. https://www.youtube.com/c/TonyHeller

3
shill273 3 points ago +3 / -0

Climate change is communism thriugh the backdoor.

3
DrinkTeaNotKoolaid 3 points ago +3 / -0

The earth has got a fever. Be afraid, very afraid. Ten years from the point of no return. We need to act, we need to act bold, we need to act NOW! Blah blah blah

3
theRealPizzabandit 3 points ago +3 / -0

We all know that Australia is an island dude...it floats!

3
LesboPregnancyScare 3 points ago +3 / -0

140 years? try 400 years

There are houses on the Bosphorus, the straight in Istanbul between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, that have been there for 400+ years. Right on the water, you could fish out the window, and the ground floor is ~3ft above the water.

There is a palace there built in in the 1600s that is the same: up against the water, ground is 3ft up. It is now a hotel. view of the palace from the water and the houses/buildings in the background also on the water

There are no added fortifications to account for rising sea levels, sea levels havent changed in 400+ years. Its such a joke. Climate change is just another oligarch grift to get more money. If they really cared they would crack down on China, since they are the biggest polluter and still building new coal plants, or take manufacturing out of China and India where they dont care about pollution and back to the west to be better regulated.

3
AVeryNakedMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the fake sea level data produced by NASA says that the sea level will take 90 years to rise 1 foot.

Tony Heller on Youtube produced a video showing that their data isn't even honest though. They cherry pick the sea level data they want to share, and ignore other data that goes contrary to it.

Manmade global warming is a lie.

3
Deplorable_Yankee 3 points ago +3 / -0

The best part of climate change is humans thinking they are a factor. Lol. I love how the climate change nazis try to lesson the impact the sun has on climate and the fact that earthly processes such as volcanic eruptions do much more than we do.

It is about mind control.

3
Barthaneous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ice in a cup of water when melted does not rise the water level. Basic elementary science .

3
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not hassling you but just saying I wouldnt use that logic as Greenland and Antarctica are on land.

2
Barthaneous 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know, my point is that the ice in the ocean is already in the ocean, if it melts it changes nothing.

1
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 1 point ago +1 / -0

But huge amounts of ice are on land. Gar more than in the water in the Artic.... if ice is melting, then that's relevant.

That said both these ice sheets are miles thick in places. That ice is not going anywhere soon.

1
Barthaneous 1 point ago +1 / -0

But here is also the thing. Even if the ice melts, you can see right now that there are extreme droughts all over the world specifically California. If the ice melts then more water will be dumped into the oceans to which would cause more rain storms which might do damage to the surface but would it not bring the necessary rainfall that places like California are needing?

1
Hattmall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, but he's saying the ice is on land, so it's not "in the ocean" at least right now. We know the Ocean did use to be higher when the earth was hotter. The coast line was ~ 300 ft higher. It's not like people can't just move inland though. There's lots of empty space inland because coasts are most desirable.

1
mridion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh yes, the Artic floats! Down under it doesn’t float. Nothing floats down under.

3
HIGH_ENERGY_MEMES 3 points ago +4 / -1

Doesnt this photo actually imply the sea is rising. Look at the high tide mark, that's what matters as it's not dependent on the time of the photo as done people seem to look at the water line itself.

In the old photo the high tide mark seems to be 1 or 2 bricks above the rock line. In the new photo it seems to be 3 or 4 bricks high.

Are there other photos like this? There must be some of stuff like statue of liberty or other coastal areas.

3
hillaryprison 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glacier National part had to remove their doomsday signs claiming that all the glaciers would be melted by I think a few years ago.

This year is record snow and the main roads still aren't even open.

3
Gnometard 3 points ago +9 / -6

Man made climate change, don't be dumb with your words.

No sane person denies the existence of ice ages but being dumb with your words implies that you do deny their existence.

This is a result of you being programmed into being the "evil science denier" they need to push their side further into the insanity.

Please, let's stay out of their frame. Let's think. Let's use words correctly and form our opinions like men rather than being "anti them"

4
RootLevelPrivilege 4 points ago +4 / -0

To be fair, this is the outcome of them conflating "climate change" with "man made climate change". When they say "we need to act now to fight climate change", they of course mean man made. When people respond "climate change is bullshit", they can then call them "science deniers", because of course climate change happens.

2
BillGall2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your final statement, "because of course climate change happens" is essentially a meaningless statement and plays into the hands of the left wing climate alarmists. All scientists understand that the climate has changed throughout Earth's history. So what! However, there is no scientific proof that burning fossil fuels to produce carbon dioxide and water has resulted in a warming of the earth in any significant way. (Climate alarmists want to blame any negative changes to the climate on additional carbon dioxide resulting from burning of fossil fuels.) We do know that increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has a positive effect on green plants and thus is good for mankind.

1
RootLevelPrivilege 1 point ago +1 / -0

We agree. The real "climate change" is just that the earth's climate is not constant over time. It is conflated with what used to be "global warming", that is, catastrophic anthropogenic climate change. Denying the second is conflated with denying the first. Everyone knows ice ages and even tropical ages (see the dinosaurs) happened. We have mostly been exiting an ice age for centuries now.

2
BillGall2 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are not "forming our opinions", we are putting forth scientific facts. On the issue of Global Warming (ie. Climate change) the science is on our side. The dire warnings of the Climate change crowd is based on Phony science. There is no scientific proof that burning fossil fuels is warming the earth. On. the other hand, there is scientific proof that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is good for green plants and thus good for mankind.

2
Im_shmmaaaaaat 2 points ago +2 / -0

FB says fact check false

1
BaronFalcon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read the article they refer to. They can't prove any rise either, and that place has had a tide gauge since the 1800's. They take 6 paragraphs to state the margin of error is too great to come to any conclusion and their best guess is 0 to +/- .14mm, which adds up to about 3/4", but, they can't prove it. So they can't prove it hasn't risen, but they can't prove it's risen., Therefore it must be false? lol

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well you see its because of the extreme drought!

2
ScoobyDeux 2 points ago +2 / -0

We spent billions looking for water on Mars to prove its sustainable for life. The Earth makes more of it and the dems don't want it.

2
krepoisbest 2 points ago +2 / -0

You should try to avoid "climate change" in this context since climate change is of course real. Climate always changed and will continue to do so.

2
Pelosi_Halitosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always has been.

2
Nemesistyx 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would rather bet on it being TECTONIC PLATES AND WATER DISPLACEMENT on it... Its a decent little change but thats expected which science has already said about the history of the planet.

2
sleepyfalcon 2 points ago +2 / -0

to be fair, there is such a thing as called "High Tide" and "Low Tide". So it could have changed over the years. This photo BTFO's that theory if taken at High Tide then.

2
Crashott 2 points ago +2 / -0

Greatest Criminal HOAX ever perpetrated by The Super Wealthy on average Dummies, who believe Bad Bastards ended with Hitler and Stalin. Problem is that Hitler’s Financiers were never dealt with at Nuremberg because their Crimes were (ask Henry Ford) were “Just Business”. These Monsters without Consciences kept breeding and their Offspring now own Nations Governments and The Media and are Regulars at DAVOS

2
WassermanSchultz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clearly that building is floating on the water.

2
Kekistan_United 2 points ago +2 / -0

we have also seen record 'greenage' and foliage growth based on satellite maps

as well as record antartic ice growth over the same period.

buuuuuuuuuuuuuuut we cant talk about it cus some horsefaced cunt says 'its the new deal'

2
CANATIVE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Better get that booster bitches. It may save you.

2
Nochomo 2 points ago +2 / -0

it was 40 degrees cooler in December - DEBOONKED!!!!

2
VinnysMagicGrits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Al Gore got rich by spewing this bullshit. The dude's net worth is over $300 million.

2
GreenBean1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ladies and gentlemen, let's look at this from the macrolevel.

How many months until the election? About 4-5 or so.

So this is merely positioning to get in that ass and push back against those angry peons (aka citizens).

You can already here in their vocal fry encrusted, patronizing, effeminate voices. Stop complaining! vs, you're right, let's help you out.

They're feigning ignorance and stupidity, but they've went to the finest institutions in the world? Really?

Playing dumb as a defense looks better than the reality of what this is.

A long march to the great & grade (loud fart noise) reset (boooo).

Ok, so let's take a look at this one:

  • 100 Mil to the finest LE (le fib, as in lie) in the universe

Purpose:

More FF's (Friendly Fun - for everyone)

Investigate deplorables to put those cuddly, cute, exceptionally wonderful, red flag-ito laws to use, simply to "hold" on to them for an indefinite period of time

To run cover for all wonderful experts and our lovely "health professionals" who have helped set back the genetic code of homo sapiens by decades

To shut up angry mama and papa bears who are trying holding their school boards/educators to task for trying to hokey-pokey their children - who some these educators believe belong to them aka own your children.

To hire people that can enforce the law via social media and conduct nice, friendly, not intimidating at all visits to your home and tell you to kindly treat your views like a visit to the library (the drag queen reading variety) aka keep quiet and deal with it

To help investigate people who complain against politicians who will vote for the GS (Great Shit, Good Safety, whatever its) bill and ultimately, the soon (probably already, ready) coming amnesty 5,000! bill.

Sooo...

We have a GS bill, which can be used against ideological opponents, if someone on say, twitter, tweets that you're stinky racist republican (nevermind the fact that the dems and the KKK were and probably are still as tight as Kim K's jeans)

We have an election, which could and should result in a red wave, but oh look, here's an amnesty bill. Let's lock y'all down (via inflation and high gas prices), piss y'all off, only to legalize a bunch of hungry and needy people from other countries. And hey, let's give them ballots, so they can totally overwhelm the righteously pissed-offness of the American people.

Then, by legalizing everyone and finally overwhelming the entitlement system (queue Cloward Piven), we can introduce the CBDC, social credit mumbojumbo and control will be ours. Mwahahaha.

Ladies and gents, these fine (totally not parasitical) humanoids are quite obvious.

So what's a person to do? Game over, right?

No, no, nOnO.

You must begin, NOW.

Get fuckin' creative. Memes, banner ads, billboards, stamps on dollar bills, leaflets under car windshields.

Gotta play in both realms. Analog and digital.

For Analog, call it A.I.D.S - Analog information distribution supremacy.

And for the digital portion, call it - fuck it, just mass send email and communicate this info.

I must be clear: No fucking violence, folks.

You must be smarter, wiser, more competent, better spoken and persuasive. Be as wise as serpents and as innocent as dove.

Or, if you can't do that, use your printing/email skills and let people know what the dealio is.

We have the information that Fister (not Pfizer) jabs suck, via the FOIA court releases.

Start printing them out and putting them on the desk of doctors, school administrators and ask questions. Guilt trips will wake them up. At least the non-narcissistic ones.

You can say, wait, you wanna mandate a thing that can, according the manufacturer data, do the following to my child? Bitch, please! Will you pay their medical bills if there is an adverse reaction? Let them know a big, fat, juicy lawsuit will go down if they continue the fuckery.

Same with the masks. There are studies that show that shit don't work and that you're sucking down your morning breath like a 2 dollar Tijuana hooker.

Mass emailing them to people at unis, health places, corporations, NGO's, churches, McDonalds restaurants. There's gotta be at least one person around here who can do that. It's sooooo easy.

If you open the eyes of at least one doc, friend, coworker, proggy, etc, then you've succeeded. Imagine what will happen if hundreds know, or thousands or, dare I say it, millions!?!?

Just be sure you highlight the sexy side effects, like bell's palsy, blood clots or that lovely, lovely VAIDS (aka inVADer Zim).

What if you went to the hospital, or mall, movie theater, parking garages and treated things these pages like leaflets and put it under their car's windshield?

What if you protested the RINO's homes, churches and trips to Wal-Mart/Target/night clubs and made it so they knew they fucked up by selling you out? Remember, that bill hasn't happened, yet.

What if you went outside their homes and played the loudest, juiciest fart noises, outside their homes and joined that with the word, sellout? or Globalist/Democrats cucked you/Or called them low-t tyrants?

What if you send your friends those lovely videos of Joepedo saying the N word to people and slide in those we wanna get rid of the fossil fuel videos, thus being the reason you're paying so damn much at pump?

What if you bought more "I did that" stickers and stuck them on the gas pumps, like on the little metal spot where gas pump handle, goes.

What if you FOIA'ed schools, hospitals, church ministers, politicians, departments of health and asked them what the science (medical science not political science) is or how they came to their decision? Or legislatures?

What if you also sent these came people those Fister FOIA docs and said, hey man, you said these things were safe and effective, but right here, in their own data, it can fuck my ovaries? Pls help.

What if you also asked those same people were you paid royalties/given funding for these policies?

Or went to these same places and left an nicely edited leaflet on a table, but titles, 50 ways to save gas!

Think about it. Most people are home from school. Most people wanna travel, but they can't. Not really.

So, now is the time. And when do we stop doing these things? Never!

Because the price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

Don't wait until the end of October, when the world may look different and gas could be 15 dollars a gallon.

Gotta get in that ass, right now. Deep.

Smooth agitation, baby.

Take that lovely information you/we have, spread the word, email your schools/unis/churches/bars/IG frens (whatever) and say, hey, according to fister's data, these jabronis cause huge boobs and heavy balls and by huge boobs and heavy balls, I mean VAIDS and bells palsy.

****** Again, they've already telegraphed their moves. ******

Ok, fren, you ready, here it is. How it'll most likely go.

**

GS bill - pew pews get taken via red flag-ito laws - from deplorables >

Amnesty >

Give newly legalized peeps $$$ (in the name of human rights) to manipulate them >

Newly legalized peeps vote for team blue (boo) and funky ass rino's (who have pretty much said, awww cuck it, lemme bend over the dems - at least they'll let me keep my country club, money and whatever funky ass vices that I have) and, shit, what the fuck? America would have as much energy left as a 700 pound fat man who tried to walk backwards on one foot up Lombard street in San Francisco >

Economic collapse (the Fed says -- sorry folks, the dollar stinks, but yo, we've got this CBDC (Cunty Big Dick Contraption) and look, we're gonna give it to you and that's not all, let's try to merge Mexico and our friends up North with up, to become the American Union! queue a slow motion fart noise >

Then, it's a brave (shitty) new world. **

And I imagine, so more lovely distractions/FF's (friendly fun)/brand nu pandemic/power outages/lil wars/anarchic tyranny to get everyone all riled up.

This is the game, folks. It's right there in plain, colorful English.

They may ease up on the pedal to cool people down a lil, but their foot is never off the gas. They know they have to do this. They're committed. Otherwise, we might just realize that they ain't shit and that they've fucked us with no Vaseline.

They call it "climate change" for a reason, because, the sociopolitical climate is changing.

That's why in 2018, they said we have 12 years left. 12 years from 2018 is 2030, they that Agenda 2030 is supposed to make it gorgeous face on the scene.

So, how can you help?

Read the above. ^

If you don't know what to do or how to do it, read rules for radicals.

Read their community organizer/riot/how to persuade books. Appeal to the emotion with facts and righteousness.

Copy their methods. Use colorful words to describe their actions.

Things like, Judas Pence (dunno if he is a white hat, but you get the idea), groomer, out of touch, dark politician. Learn how to speak like this.

Or say things like, the only reason they call it the green new deal, is that the deal is, they take your green.

Or listen to podcasts by famous persuaders, you know, the one's the celebrities go to and learn the method, so you can use them to help wake people the fuck up.

You can do it! It ain't over folks!

Fuckin' Non-Compliance is the word(s)!

All that is above is so easy and will open soooo many eyes.

Analog and digital realm. Grab it, kiss it, make it yours, tonight and forevermore!

Over and out. kisses lol

P.S. No fucking violence!!! Keep it cool, baby. Non-violent, non-compliant, super creative methods!

2
RogueLeaderX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sea levels have risen and lowered in different areas. Climate change is localized and is a natural process.

1
Deplorable_Yankee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe this 100%. Additionally, throw in the ups and downs of the sun's activities along with the Earth's very own volcanic system and you have natural climate change.

While I do think we can be better protectors of our air land and sea by not being retarded, the Earth does what Earth does.

2
Testosteroneape2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

whatever happened to the dangerously shrinking ozone layer?

2
Daddy_Knew_Best 2 points ago +2 / -0

now how exactly do they accurately measure this? i mean the margin of error must be nonexistent. did they pinpoint the precise moment during the tidal cycle to measure so we can compare apples to apples from the previous measurement? was the water moving at the time of the measurement? if so- how can it be accurate down to the cm? my point is- this climate change stuff seems subjection-able, not objectionable....like junk science

2
GabeC1997 2 points ago +2 / -0

Retard: "It's so hot today, it must be global warming!"

Summer last year: "..."

2
Chemicaltackle23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man I WISH I WOULD HAVE BOUGHT THAT BEACH FRONT PROPERTY IN MARTHAS VINYARD 20years ago.

2
MakinBacon 2 points ago +2 / -0

surest sign that aspect is bullshit..."elites" buying coastal properties, banks backing it, resistance to building more dams/reservoirs that have proven to slow sea level rise

2
MemeLawd 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's possible one was taken at low tide and the other at high tide. This image is lazy proof of anything.

2
Stolen 2 points ago +3 / -1

OMG! 0.0 cm. That means it is a Climate Change Conspiracy.

2
finscreenname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aliens are stealing our water. It's in every movie.

2
Cicero1992 2 points ago +2 / -0

How are you determining the tide?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Jacksonvarrik 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Kremlin sponsors activists like Greta Thunberg to destroy Western energy industries.

2
Winston_Smith84 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are misinformed. Clearly, the fort in the picture is being subjected to local geologic uplift that masks the real sea level rise in Sydney Harbor.

1
mridion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fake news