3075
Comments (251)
sorted by:
154
Schiffblower 154 points ago +155 / -1

I’m shocked I tell you. Shocked.

56
RyanUpCreek 56 points ago +56 / -0

I am as shocked as Paul Joseph Watson is

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
12
Seems_legit83 12 points ago +12 / -0

Not sure what that has to do with this

-33
elcomedian -33 points ago +1 / -34

Lol Alex Jones fucked Blair White. I’d bet money.

15
RedditIs4Retards 15 points ago +16 / -1

You have weird fantasies

-20
elcomedian -20 points ago +1 / -21

He hangs out with him all the time and was caught having a tranny porn tab open in his browser during a stream.

9
Sheprecon31 9 points ago +9 / -0

REEEEEEEEEeeeeeeee

2
IowanMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously? Alex Jones was? Michael Malice also hangs out with Blaire too I seen.

1
elcomedian 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s been on several podcasts with Alex Jones including Tim Pool.

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prove it

2
btntx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but did he give him a reach around?

2
Deemike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does Blair White still have a dick? He like the type to have it cut off.

0
elcomedian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Haven’t checked.

28
that_sound 28 points ago +28 / -0

"I'm shocked! SHOCKED to find that pedophilia has been going on in here."

"Your child porn, xir."

"Oh, thank you very much!"

3
TommyJarvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

That character DID have a penchant for the young girls, remember?

2
that_sound 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't. Must be time to rewatch it.

Edit: Just found a clip of the scene. Oh, yeah... Gross.

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a phenomenal movie

1
that_sound 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think so too. I put it at the very top of my list of best ever. Literally #1, but it has been many years since I've watched it. But do me a solid. Because it's your fault I went and looked at some clips. Just kidding, obviously.

So one of my main memories from the movie is that Ilsa is the most beautiful creature God ever created (don't tell my wife). Just stunning in every way. But I just watched a few clips and Bergman's acting is.... not quite what I remembered. A little over the top.

Maybe the lesson is don't watch clips. Maybe the acting makes more sense in the context of the whole movie. I hope so. I don't want to rewatch it and lose my (maybe false) memories.

Thoughts?

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bergman is a bit “presentational”. She’s playing the melodramatic heroine. I think it works in the movie, but contrast that to all the other performances in that movie and it stands out a little in a bad way. Bogart has such an easy way about his acting, Claude Raines, Peter Lorre.. I mean come on!

Anyone playing opposite Bogart seemed like they were “acting” compared to his ultra-natural style. He never really played any “character” aside from “Bogart”, though.

1
that_sound 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright. Time for a rewatch. Thanks.

21
Joeret 21 points ago +21 / -0

Shocked the only two options were male and female? Yeah, so was I.

13
NormalCitizen 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm shaking right now.

12
Autist_of_Kiev 12 points ago +12 / -0

Let’s see your shocked face, Private!

82
turdinthepunch 82 points ago +83 / -1

our tolerance is their greatest weapon.

11
Captain-D 11 points ago +14 / -3

This whole site has become "person or lawmaker does predictable horrendous thing --- we're so mad!"

I still come by here very day, but this feels so fake and weak at this point.

10
try4gain 10 points ago +11 / -1

We’re basically click bait now

4
Covfefe_Commando 4 points ago +4 / -0

It must be Thursday...

3
BudBurner 3 points ago +3 / -0

But wait...have you heard there is gonna be a trucker convoy?

3
awookienookie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never forget the great T_D days where every post had above 20k likes and the front page of Reddit was filled with T_D posts.

-2
doomerglowie -2 points ago +1 / -3

Never forget the great T_D days where every post had above 20k likes and the front page of Reddit was filled with T_D posts.

Those days are gone. What few are left that came here are subject to getting accounts banned if they post something other than strongly worded complaints of current events or recycled memes.

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see it more as, Once again we were proven right. Sadly though like 99.99% of us don't really have much power to change anything. Even killdozer for all of its memes and destruction it caused was nothing more than a small bump in the road. business went on as usual shortly after.

1
ThatsDoable 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. There is Zero organizing on the state level here. There is encouragement to vote for X politician and nothing else but complaining and memes.

The memes at this point are what's worse of all. This is like Hitler coming to exterminate the Jews, and them drawing a funny picture with Hitler on a horses ass for lulz as a response. It's retarded.

1
Taliesin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evil hates being mocked, and its insane over-reaction to even the gentlest of mockery is a great morale booster to those who are fighting that evil.

Take the famous film clip created during the second world war, "Schichlegruber Doing the Lambeth Walk." On seeing it, Hitler threw one of his tantrums, and Goebbels stumbled out of the theatre white-faced with rage.

The film was distributed widely throughout occupied France, and it boosted the spirit of resistance greatly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnBhQHa0xDI

5
IWanttotalknow 5 points ago +5 / -0

“When I am weaker than you I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles” - Frank Herbert.

Replace "Freedom" (though that too) and replace it with "Tolerance" and you have exactly what is going on. It's actually literally called "Repressive Tolerance"

Think of it as two children playing games. Each child has five different games they like, each of them requires two players. Ten games total.

Then the first child says "I don't want to play your 5th game. I don't like it, I think it's sexist." and the second child goes "OK, we won't play that one." and now you have nine games, four for one child, five for the other. The first child then says "I don't want to play your 4th game, I think it's homophobic." and the second child goes "OK, maybe, I don't mind, we can not play that one too."

Rinse/repeat until only five games are being played and it's only the first child's games. "Tolerance" which was once extended to the second child in playing his games is now completely removed. One step at a time. Same shit, but applied politically.

Think of it as a tolerant society dealing with Nazis, who are intolerant. They keep pulling in one direction, and the tolerant keep tolerating it, because it's their defining feature. Same with the Woke. The way to defeat this is through intolerance and Karl Popper laid out the exact rules for this situation in 1945, with the Nazis fresh on his mind:

"In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."

Do the Woke fit this criteria?

  1. They refuse to meet on the level of rational argument.
  2. They forbid their followers from listening to rational argument.
  3. They teach them to use violence.

There are many examples for each of these things. Exceptions as well, but by and large the Woke fit these criteria to an overwhelming degree.

Those are the conditions in which you have located a group so intolerant that Popper claims the RIGHT suppress them.

The corollary to this is Herbert Marcuse's "Repressive Tolerance", which the Woke ascribe to and is described above. It's essentially a rule for creating intolerance no matter what, aimed at the right. If a person, a thing or even a thought is deemed "right-wing" you WITHDRAW TOLERANCE from it. The mechanism most commonly used is to call it "racist", "homophobic". "transphobic", "bigoted" or paint it in another negative light that has no truth or only the slimmest nugget of truth to it. Call it "old fashioned", "a relic of religion", "regressive", etc.

You might recognize it as Critical Theory. Not "critical thinking" as people know it, but "Critical Theory" is just a formal name for criticizing a thing from every angle possible, all the time, either completely or 99% devoid of any veracity or truth. Lie, cheat, steal, do whatever it takes to attack the thing you wish tolerance to be removed from. Create an entire academic field of study called "Critical Race Theory", assigned PhDs, have thousands of papers written, have them celebrated, give them status and clout and develop an entire world view and way of thinking that does nothing but criticize based on skin color then cite that as to why such-and-such is racist, to give it a veneer of legitimacy. Create an entire pseudo-reality out of it.

The mechanism of Repressive Tolerance works in such a manner that if you act in that manner, EVERYTHING is tolerated from the left, up to and including stealing an election and violent rioting and murders. NOTHING is to be tolerated from the right, up to and including censorship and even pre-censorship so a right-wing thought doesn't form in the head of a person. This is the roadmap of where we live, and the author even described that the situation would appear "clownish" back in the 1960s, predicting where we are today, and how to get here.

Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

2
buckiemohawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

someone watches James Lindsay

3
IWanttotalknow 3 points ago +3 / -0

For about five years now ;)

You need to branch out though, because he doesn't cover everything. He was basically my serious introduction to philosophy and ideology and then it was like "Whoa, there's a whole world of shit out there no one talks about or thinks about."

Funny story: There's a 1980s anti-pornography movie movie where a leftist against pornography accurately recognizes Marcuse's "Repressive Tolerance" being used against 'normal' sex. It's called "NOT a Love Story" I believe. I checked up on the woman who recognized it and understood Repressive Tolerance - and today? She's a full on leftist, completely taken in by Repressive Tolerance lol.

2
buckiemohawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I warn people about the anti pornography left, that they are the one the same and the reason they dont want these things is totally different than a more conservative person. The one is a moral the other super feministic theory that leads to actual pedophile and zoophile

1
Taliesin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Marcuse pushed pedophilia with his doctrine of polymorphic perversity, not because he was himself a pedophile, but because breaking down fundamental sexual taboos would further the destruction of society.

https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

2
IWanttotalknow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually don't know if he was a pedophile or not. If not, dude was likely at least a perv of a higher order, he loved fucking with eros and psychology. Hard to tell. But you're not incorrect about him liking it because it breaks down fundamental sexual taboos that furthers the destruction of society.

3
Beat_to_Quarters 3 points ago +3 / -0

Give them an inch and they'll demand drag queens in schools.

2
Leovinus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Diversity is their Strength

1
Taliesin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perversity is their strength

1
BizarreCzar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here I thought it was glitter.

48
AlcoholicRetard 48 points ago +66 / -18

All gays are pedophiles.

35
RyanUpCreek 35 points ago +44 / -9

I'm gonna go ahead and assume that after all of this shit lately. LGBT is a vehicle and the pedos have taken the driver seat

33
keepamericagreat102 33 points ago +35 / -2

lgbt is pedos. in west hollywood you always see old faggy with a young “groomed” partner. sick shit.

10
DrJosephWarren 10 points ago +10 / -0

Chicken Hawks they used to be called

4
IHaveEvidence 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why is that?

Must not be a "Target Rich Environment" for the chickens.

A gay boy wants a job where he can bend over and grab his ankles...

And get paid for something he did for free in highschool.

But he looks around and all the pitchers he knows are worthless Dirtbags.

So he has to be a Catcher for an old HIV infected pervert.

Seen it up close.

Had a cousin that was an HIV infected pervert.

His Chicken died of AIDs.

So he got a new Young Chicken.

Then that one died of AIDs.

Finally he died of AIDs.

Wow! we didn't see that one coming....

2
Heavy_Metal_Patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

A very common tale in LA.

4
CrustySockpuppet 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need to bring that term back

11
Viewer01 11 points ago +16 / -5

Gay rights has always been a smoke screen for bolsheviks. The democrats wailed and gnashed their teeth the day the Supreme Court ruled because it immediately became a non issue.

It is nothing more than degenerates playing victim for attention and letting their masters loot the treasury.

1
Taliesin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Worker's rights, Gay rights, feminism, Critical Race Theory - these are all useful idiots being used as fronts for Bolshevism, and you know what happens to useful idiots.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
9
Patriots_dont_kneel 9 points ago +13 / -4

No we're not. Fuck off with that divide and conquer bs. Most of us don't even like all this stuff that's getting promoted to children.

4
GodEmperor2024 4 points ago +9 / -5

I don't think every homo is a pedo. However, every homo is part of a sexual revolution which includes pedophilia. So every time you try to normalize your sexual perversion and make it public, you help pedos.

You must understand that you were not born inverted, just like a drug addict was not born a drug addict. You're just a victim of grooming, whether you realize it or not.

3
Patriots_dont_kneel 3 points ago +10 / -7

You're just a victim of grooming, whether you realize it or not.

This couldn't be further from the truth. I'm getting tired of this narrative that all gays were either molested or groomed into it. I've been attracted to boys since I was like 11. I'm not sure if I even knew what "homosexual" meant back then. Some people just have a couple wires crossed in the brain, and that's fine. It's just the luck of the draw.

So every time you try to normalize your sexual perversion and make it public, you help pedos.

I do not ask for special privileges. What straight people can do in public, I can too. This is not negotiable, and it has nothing to do with pedophilia. I can tell from your language that you have a strong dislike for gay men, so consider if you might just be trying to associate them with a morally reprehensible thing for this reason. "Promoting pedophilia" is one of the worst things you can accuse a man of, and to do it so casually and without any reasoning borders on evil.

0
GodEmperor2024 0 points ago +7 / -7

I've been attracted to boys since I was like 11

At 11 years old sexuality still hasn't developed, so a boy doesn't really know what he's attracted to. That's when the brainwashing of globohomo comes in.

You're not attracted to women because you're impotent. You can't fuck them, therefore they don't make you hard.

What straight people can do in public, I can too

No, absolutely fucking not! You doing things in public spreads your mental disease. It normalizes a pathology. It infects others. It humiliates and subverts the foundation of society.

9
Patriots_dont_kneel 9 points ago +10 / -1

At 11 years old sexuality still hasn't developed, so a boy doesn't really know what he's attracted to. That's when the brainwashing of globohomo comes in.

I don't think you understand what I'm saying. Maybe it's common now, but when I was growing up I wasn't exposed to homosexual couples on TV and such. All I knew is that I found some boys in my class cute, and wasn't interested in girls like my peers.

You're not attracted to women because you're impotent. You can't fuck them, therefore they don't make you hard.

WDYM by impotent? That's not the case, physically or mentally.

No, absolutely fucking not! You doing things in public spreads your mental disease. It normalizes a pathology. It infects others. It humiliates and subverts the foundation of society.

Ok settle down Dr Fauci, I don't have the plague. There's nothing wrong with being gay. Nobody is going to be "converted" from liking women to liking men by seeing me holding hands with my husband or something. If you really think that it's that easy, maybe you're not very secure in your own sexuality.

1
GodEmperor2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

All I knew is that I found some boys in my class cute,

Being a homo is a choice. Every man can tell the difference between a hot man and an ugly man. If I see a hot man I can tell that he's hot and attractive, like you can surely tell the difference between Melania and Hillary in terms of attractiveness. The difference is that I choose to not do sexual acts with men. What you get sexually attracted to depends on what you decide to like. And what you condition yourself to like.

wasn't interested in girls like my peers.

Yeah, it's common when you're not fully developed. Being with a woman is fucking hard - you need to build up the confidence to do it. Which is what you lack.

WDYM by impotent? That's not the case, physically or mentally.

Impotent is a medical term that means that you can't fuck a pussy. So you are impotent by definition, no matter if you can deadlift 4 plates.

Ok settle down Dr Fauci,

I must admit that this was funny, I laughed out loud.

Nobody is going to be "converted" from liking women to liking men by seeing me holding hands with my husband or something.

It does have an effect, especially on vulnerable people like depressed people and teenagers.

If you really think that it's that easy, maybe you're not very secure in your own sexuality.

See, that's exactly what you do you filthy homo. You try to convert people, by installing doubts in their mind. Always prowling looking to prey on the vulnerable men.

If I'm not very secure in my sexuality that does not mean that I should accept it and be a homo. You assume that only because one feels an animalistic carnal urge then that means that he should follow that urge. If you feel the need to smoke a cigarette that does not mean that you should do it.

You're just weak, a loser, who accepted to follow an easy sexual perversion instead of acquiring the confidence to have a relationship with a woman. You'll never be able to make love with another human being, do you not understand that?

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Being a homo is a choice. Every man can tell the difference between a hot man and an ugly man. If I see a hot man I can tell that he's hot and attractive, like you can surely tell the difference between Melania and Hillary in terms of attractiveness. The difference is that I choose to not do sexual acts with men.

What are you telling me? There's a difference between recognizing that a man is handsome and sexual attraction. Are you saying that you're sexually attracted to some men? Dude, I have news for you...

Impotent is a medical term that means that you can't fuck a pussy.

I don't have that though. I can, I just don't want to.

Yeah, it's common when you're not fully developed. Being with a woman is fucking hard - you need to build up the confidence to do it. Which is what you lack.

I hear you, but asking a boy out is hard too. Much harder in fact if violence is a real possibility if you're outed. So I don't think lack if confidence was the real issue here.

See, that's exactly what you do you filthy homo. You try to convert people, by installing doubts in their mind. Always prowling looking to prey on the vulnerable men.

Look dude, I didn't mean to insult you. You're the one dropping weird hints about how you could totally be into dudes if you made that choice or something. Looks like I stuck a nerve, so I'll back off. Your sexuality is your own business. Repression might be a valid choice for some, it just isn't for me. Let me just say this: straight men don't turn gay. I've never seen that happen, ever. Every time a guy comes out, he always says that he's had those thoughts for a loooooong time. Just think about that and your situation.

1
Apexturtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m kind of agreeing with him about saying it’s weird how you think it is a choice. I can understand the people that say it is forced on them and it’s a form of brainwashing to be gay, but it seems like you’re saying you see men and women and chose women even though it was difficult?

Most men I know do not have difficulty in maintaining their heterosexuality.

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the right answer.

1
HeroCatMarkPurrman 1 point ago +2 / -1

just like a drug addict was not born a drug addict

This is a weak argument. Genetics play a huge role in addiction.

I suppose one could argue in a very literal sense you’re not an addict until you actually start using but it would be disingenuous. I was an addict before I ever picked up a bottle. I put the bottle down and I’m still an addict despite no longer drinking. It’s just an inescapable part of who I am.

-2
GodEmperor2024 -2 points ago +2 / -4

You must understand the difference between Christianity and Judaism.

For Christianity urges, especially carnal urges, affect almost everybody and the point is that you must resist them. Because morality needs to control the animal instincts.

Judaism on the other hand tells you that your natural urges need to be accepted, and welcomed. They tell you that morality leads to sexual repression and therefore morality is fascist and is oppressive. If you study the Frankfurt School and Freud's school of psychoanalysis, it's all there.

Genetics plays a huge role in addition? Yes, I agree. But that does not mean that we should accept homos only because they have a genetic that makes them more susceptible to disfunction.

0
HeroCatMarkPurrman 0 points ago +2 / -2

Brother, I’m really not interested in your lectures. You’ve shown me plainly who you are and it seems you need to examine your own self rather than pontificate to others.

2
Smarmcastic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, then I would speak up to your community and let them know that if you want to be equal in the eyes of heterosexuals, then do what heterosexuals largely do in regards to their own sexual practices . . . generally don't talk about it (unless it's in small circles, bragging, pissing and moaning to your girlfriends, etc.).

6
Patriots_dont_kneel 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not sure who you think "my community" is. The gay people I associate with aren't sluts or degenerates. I do not have any influence over the "gay community" at large, any more than you have influence over the "straight community".

let them know that if you want to be equal in the eyes of heterosexuals

We are already equal legally and socially, so in every way that matters. That battle has already been won. People are entitled to their own personal opinions and biases, as long as they don't literally accuse me of crimes (like calling me a pedophile) or otherwise victimize me I don't think it's any of my business what they think.

1
Smarmcastic 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant that euphemistically, so to speak. Of course, I don't think you have influence over homosexuals at large. I think we're more in agreement than you think. The problem is the "squeaky wheels" are helping to cement a bad taste some people have about homosexuals already. But then again, this happens in a lot of sub-groups.

4
Patriots_dont_kneel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I got that. Maybe I came off a little more aggressive than I should. It's just a bit frustrating how people online assume that if I'm gay I must be leading the gay parade in an assless dildo costume or something. I guess it's to be expected, people online don't have much to go off of, so they judge based on stereotypes. Like you said, every sub-group has this issue.

2
HeroCatMarkPurrman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey brother, I don’t think you came off as aggressive at all.

You had someone hit you with a bunch of bullshit nonsense and you pushed back some. Nothing wrong with standing up for yourself.

You’re alright by me 😎

1
Haitianbychoice360 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you see the post on GAG? Gays Against Groomers? It was on here a couple of days ago.

-1
Vlad_The_Impaler -1 points ago +3 / -4

Get lost, faggot

Your butthole is not a vagina.

It's a stinky shit hole from which shit excretes.

You're a perverted FRAUD.

3
Patriots_dont_kneel 3 points ago +5 / -2

Being gay is OK. Seethe, cope and dilate. 🙃

-3
Vlad_The_Impaler -3 points ago +1 / -4

Pretending a man's butthole is a vagina is kind of like pretending you're the opposite gender or pretending Hillary Clinton isn't a bitch.

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are you so obsessed with this stuff?

2
Vlad_The_Impaler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fags don't like to talk about the details of their degeneracy.

Just like baby killers don't like to show the public pictures of the murdered babies.

You put this out in the open, people are disgusted. Naturally.

So they try to cover it up with rainbows and unicorns and smiling women in planned parenthood ads. In reality it is poop on your dick and dead babies in dumpsters. Are you uncomfortable and disgusted? You should be.

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

You put this out in the open, people are disgusted.

All sex is disgusting if you break it down to the details. All sorts of fluids being exchanged etc. Next time you're in public, try explaining the graphic details of vaginal sex to random bystanders. It's no different.

In reality it is poop on your dick

If you want to do anal, which I'm not a big fan of, you clean yourself out beforehand. We're not savages.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
6
wizzingonwallstreet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thats not true. No one is waiting to murder gays. You think if republicans return to power the will make it legal to hunt and kill gay men? You're deluded.

4
-c-i-a- 4 points ago +6 / -2

I'm not sure which level of subversion you're using, but the people who preach hate on this board now are not MAGA.

Many of them moved here after their site got shut down because they have nowhere else to go.

They pretend to be MAGA and like Trump so that they are not booted off of here.

Many more of them engage in divisive rhetoric as an attempt to destroy our movement, which I think is what you are doing.

There is no room for prejudice when your heart is full of patriotism - DJT

-2
Vlad_The_Impaler -2 points ago +2 / -4

Stop being a pussy.

I hate Pseudo-Liberal demoKKKrat Regressive Marxo-Fascists, Bio-Terrorists, Groomers, Pedos and Faggots and their synagogue of satan overlords.

Making America GREAT Again does not mean nurturing and hugging faggots. If you think faggots have a place in a GREAT CIVILIZATION then it is YOU who is the fraud.

Trump claimed that being gay was similar to having different tastes and ordering something different off the menu. It isn't the first or last time Trump was WRONG. Gays have an AGENDA and it is to spread more homosexuality and to target children. This month has been PROOF of that. It's not about the privacy of their own bedroom. What could possibly be more SATANIC than hijacking the RAINBOW, a symbol of God's covenant with man, and perverting it into something GOD Himself said was ABOMINABLE? You know the Bible tells you this yet you reject God and His instructions which means you are being sinful too.

GOD destroyed nests of faggots such as Sodom and Gomorrah and it was to demonstrate what His followers must do.

-1
GodEmperor2024 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Gays have an AGENDA and it is to spread more homosexuality and to target children.

Exactly. Like Himmler said, homosexuals are a political problem.

0
Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points ago +2 / -2

They are much more than a political problem. They spread disease. They are perverted. The Bible teaches us that man shall not lie down with man as he does with a woman. God destroys sodomites.

No one wants their son to grow up to be a faggot.

A healthy sex life is a monogamous sex life with a beautiful wife. Reproductive sex between two dedicated, committed partners. This remains true today. Thousands of years of wisdom is told in the Bible. Why do people so quickly dismiss it in preference to what is trending on twitter?

Children are innocent and bring happiness to both a mother and father. People have been BRAINWASHED to believe that a family is a burden, or that children are a burden. I think most fathers here will agree with me that having children is one of the most blessed and joyful things that ever happened to them.

The anus is a human organ for excreting waste and byproducts. It smells awful because it is being broken down by bacteria. The bacteria then excrete waste of their own, and release gases which stink. Putting your peter in there is gross. It's full of bacteria and stinks awful.

A vagina, however, is a human anatomical part that is the counterpart to a penis. Utilized for joyful, reproductive intercourse that allows sperm from one partner to join with the egg of another partner. This is how we are designed by God. Sperming on poop is perverted and weird. Would you go outside and sperm on dog shit? Why would you sperm on human shit? Gays are psychotic.

1
GodEmperor2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you on everything except that I don't think sex is just for reproduction. It's also to build a bond with a person and enjoy.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
-1
GodEmperor2024 -1 points ago +1 / -2

marxo-fascists

That's an oxymoron.

The defining feature of fascism is nationalism. The defining feature of Marxism is globalism.

0
Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm not sure either can be broken down into simply nationalistic versus globalist.

Do groups like pAnti-Fascists behave more like fascists or marxists?

Are there not factions of the demoKKKrat party that are both fascist and marxist?

If we are to define fascism and define marxism, they both entail definitions far more elaborate and expansive than simply being nationalistic versus globalist.

I believe my definition of MARXO-FASCIST considers that the modern DemoKKKrat has taken the most effective tactics of both and combined them into something new and even more tyrannical.

1
GodEmperor2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tactics do not define a political ideology. Unless you're talking about cucked ideologies like pacifism or lolbertarianism.

Marxists use violence and intimidation to achieve certain goals. Fascists use violence and intimidation to achieve the exact opposite goals. They are not the same.

It's like comparing a criminal and a policeman: they both use a gun, but they are the opposite.

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
6
John-Miller 6 points ago +10 / -4

Most pedos are gay too.

4
redgreenyellowblu 4 points ago +6 / -2

Wrong.

34
MAGAguitar 34 points ago +36 / -2

Trannys are Blackface but towards women.

7
BigMikesSwingingCock 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm a tranny with a black face.

4
_Cabal_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

Name checks out

1
CrustySockpuppet 1 point ago +1 / -0

You smell like a colon

5
BigMikesSwingingCock 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's just the pomade I use to give my pubes a Trump hairstyle, my husband loves it.

1
CrustySockpuppet 1 point ago +1 / -0

😂

2
Patriots_dont_kneel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that's their one good quality. Trannies making the radical feminists mad by turning their own ideology against them.

27
NinjaFish 27 points ago +27 / -0

Where are the red flag laws for pedophiles?

14
Zepp87 14 points ago +16 / -2

*red fag laws

21
ThomasJ 21 points ago +26 / -5

Many such fucking cases. I wish we conservatives finally grow a spine and be against all of this shit. And yes, it includes being against the “in the bedroom only” types. Homosexuality. All of it

If you aren’t brave enough to oppose it for society’s sake at least do it to protect innocent children. This nonsense has gone FAR ENOUGH.

8
_Cabal_ 8 points ago +10 / -2

Yes, all faggotry.

Tolerance is not a virtue.

5
GodEmperor2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society. When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the intolerant critic of intolerable evil is evil.

Hutton Gibson

1
WoodChipperGoesBRRR 1 point ago +4 / -3

To the woodchipper with them.

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
7
AnPrim 7 points ago +7 / -0

This a,dually would be a good thing to crowdfund

Government won't do it...

17
exwhyze 17 points ago +17 / -0

Another one.

3
BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

ANOTHER black one, yet on most similar posts, I’m told by all the self hating white cucks here that this is mostly a white thing. The people promoting, and enabling this shit aren’t mostly white, and neither are the degenerate stage demons, and street walkers per capita.

Edit: What pisses me off is the disgusting many whites who willingly take, and subject their kids to this.

2
GodEmperor2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's right. I'm reading this book and it's illuminating. It explains (among many things) how non-whites are very overrepresented among LGBT activists and trannies.

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I may have to grab a copy.

2
_Cabal_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

And many more to come

16
BigMikesWetFarts 16 points ago +17 / -1

is drag queen some kind of fancy word for sodomite?

5
Valensiakol 5 points ago +6 / -1

YAAASSSSSS KWEEEEN

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. So is homosexual.

14
deleted 14 points ago +16 / -2
13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
12
KuzoKevin 12 points ago +14 / -2

Shut up, Bigot.

11
YouKnowWhatItIs87 11 points ago +12 / -1

Somebody needs to compile all these activists getting arrested. There’s a slanderous meme going around with Trump in the center captioned “25 Sexual Assault” and it’s got 8 others surrounding with Gaetz and Jim Jordan as “Accused of child pornography or sex assault of a minor”.

10
refresco 10 points ago +10 / -0

fire up chippy

8
BigMikesWetFarts 8 points ago +9 / -1

i miss the old days when sodomites were tied to the back of trucks and drug down dirt roads

8
Shariablue_Sorosbots 8 points ago +10 / -2

Dr. Oz?

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
2
Hanging_Chad 2 points ago +3 / -1

uploading and sharing at least 135 videos and pictures of child pornography

What was his momless username?

6
knnbccb 6 points ago +8 / -2

Read the Bible parts which mention Sodom and Gomorrah, and you're one step closer to understanding their motivations and inclinations.

You can't negotiate with them or make deals with them. The only option is to rain fire upon them.

Sooner or later you will have to make a choice. Better choose wisely, or your children will get corrupted by them.

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
6
MAGAguitar 6 points ago +7 / -1

Tranny tranny b-b-banny. Banana shamma tran-fanny. Flee fi-faux-manny. Tranny

6
NeverBeFat 6 points ago +7 / -1

You mean sexual perverts who prey on children are actually sexual perverts who prey on children? No way!

6
StopThesePedos 6 points ago +8 / -2

Every single homosexual, drag queen, cross dresser, transgender, bisexual is a sexual pervert.

A large amount of perverts, are pedophiles.

6
leakmouth 6 points ago +6 / -0

wE jUsT wAnT to rEaD sToRiEs tO tHe cHiRrEn!!!

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
_Cabal_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

l0vE iS LoVe

1
elcomedian 1 point ago +3 / -2

LoVe hAs No aGe

1
Just_dumping_fuel 1 point ago +1 / -0

SeX wit AniMals iz normal

5
kent 5 points ago +6 / -1

Obviously people dressing that way and wanting to be around kids is a big red flag. The parents going along with drag queen story time are enablers of pedos.

5
chinesefoodtakeaway 5 points ago +7 / -2

Water is still wet, I see...

5
alucard13mmfmj 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trans/drag queens are super super minority. Yet it seems they got pedos for days.

5
p1smo 5 points ago +7 / -2

It's almost like there's a trend...

5
Pepedom 5 points ago +5 / -0

Absolutely disgusting

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
waxmyballs 4 points ago +5 / -1

not shocked that a drag perv is a pedo, but am shocked they got arrested with all the perv pimping and protecting going on.

4
Forty_Five 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine my shock

4
BasedMechanic 4 points ago +5 / -1

Of course it was.

4
AnIdahoan 4 points ago +5 / -1

The world needs more people like these guys. It's the unwillingness to address the pedophile problem that makes me rather miffed with "mainstream" LGBT organizations, to put things lightly.

4
realdennycrane 4 points ago +5 / -1

Can these people just leave the children alone? Find an adult in a diaper for your depravity.

4
linereddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unexpected!

4
dagoat4l 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shocked I don't believe it. You telling me a dude dressed in a skirt after kids? Can't be true.

4
nutmeg 4 points ago +4 / -0

This week on reddit a bunch of people learned the word "pantomime" and started using it in sentences when justifying and describing modern day drag queens entertaining children.

That's just a thing I noticed and thought I'd share. Now you'll see it too.

3
Retardloserimsogay 3 points ago +4 / -1

I was thinking about this today. A female to male tranny or in general lesbian is kind of silly, kind off innocent for the trans people. But there is something so disgusting about a man that engages in any of the LGBT shit, there’s no way you’ll ever tell me an over sexualized male that’s dressing in drag, is not a pedophile.

1
GodEmperor2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do know that women sexually abuse children too, right?

1
Retardloserimsogay 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, 100%

3
3
Awan-CIA-Car-Lot 3 points ago +4 / -1

Thanks. Saved.

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldn't expect there to even be as many drag queens in the country as I've seen getting caught with child pornography or child molestation criminal records. At this point, their conditional probability of being sexual predators against children is higher than the crotchetiest fundamentalist would have guessed just a few years ago. It's getting to the point where being a drag queen at all is prima facie evidence for a restraining order.

3
16BeatsAOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am dumbfounded. What? Huh?

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't they all? Now he can run for Congress, great.

3
SuitableHumanSoul 3 points ago +3 / -0

i think the majority of those drag queens are pedophiles.

3
kddawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do they say in Pokémon world, Catch ‘‘em all.

3
ALCOloco 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shocking, just shocking.

3
ThaDtothaOtothaN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shocked to the core! Who would do such a thing? Oh wait its trannies always trannies....

2
FitOfficial 2 points ago +3 / -1

In clown world shocking means entirely expected.

2
UpvoteBot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Downvote me if you’re surprised by this… I’m willing to take the hit because I don’t think that there’re enough stupid people on this board.

2
coolhandcuke 2 points ago +3 / -1

You mean a guy who wants kids to sit in his lap who isn't related isn't a perv? Wow.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
Deemike 2 points ago +2 / -0

wE juSt WanT tO gET mARrIeD, No onE is COmiNg foR yOuR kIDs