3643
Comments (391)
sorted by:
228
deleted 228 points ago +358 / -130
373
4DHopscotch 373 points ago +427 / -54

Show us, on your barbie doll, where DeSantis rubbed his balls on your mom.

128
shadypollster 128 points ago +135 / -7

Kek

130
Jtenten 130 points ago +130 / -0

Hijacking a kek to talk about Florida & DeSantis. I grew up in a rural, conservative town in Florida that was amazing. Kids playing outside, fishing, hunting, bonfires.

Florida was SO much less political than any other state in the South. Of course look at voting trends, but I’m also telling you the people didn’t give a rip. More than that, South Florida has been so Godless and so unchurched until recently.

What’s happening in Florida is amazing because it’s actually a movement. Floridians are now fiery red MAGA and proud of it. The trump love here is through the roof.

I’m pissed about the gun laws here and skeptical that DeSantis will meaningfully respond to this ruling. But my point is, it’s still fresh here. People are turning to God and their values are changing, but the red wave is taking it’s time.

38
TrumpoWon2020 38 points ago +38 / -0

I think it's I'll illegal to hijack a top kek. The punishment is probably something like being given an AR15 for free. Maybe an SKS filled with cosmoline

19
TheDespotofCartoons 19 points ago +19 / -0

Huh…do I want another AR? What a stupid question! I need a kek to hijack, STAT!

13
TrumpoWon2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

Careful, you might get the SKS filled with cosmoline. Delivered in a 55 gallon drum of cosmoline.

11
TheFountainhead 11 points ago +11 / -0

Jokes on you. Some people like the taste of cosmoline.

7
TheDespotofCartoons 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh, oh, can I change my answer? /s 😋

8
The_Usurper 8 points ago +8 / -0

That’s what Anaconda does every time. He is desperate for attention.

15
MasterVader2U 15 points ago +15 / -0

THIS. As a Floridian I feel the same. Though all of these blue state plates all over the place are driving me mad. I also wonder if Desantis will ever consticarry is. I'm done with permits. I just wanna keep my gun and my rights.

20
ace4545 20 points ago +20 / -0

I moved to florida because i couldnt stand california. I was born and raised MAGA and will only vote maga policies till the day i die

3
Daddy_Knew_Best 3 points ago +3 / -0

then welcome to this great state brother

1
Getthetorches 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you registered to Vote at your new address? Make sure you vote for school board and all local elections.

1
ace4545 1 point ago +1 / -0

i am

13
doug2 13 points ago +13 / -0

I remember Florida was projected to Clinton in 16

14
Magabirdlady2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Fake polls.

10
trump4045 10 points ago +10 / -0

Was projected to Romney in 12. It's all a show.

9
SteelBallRun1890 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yup, just like they all were. My grandma still asks me to this day "why didn't Hillary win? All the channels said she would, did Trump steal it from her?" sometimes when I'm talking about how Biden stole it. She's old and has no understanding at all of politics (never votes) but it's frustrating that all it takes is a few shitheads on TV to say whatever they want for people to eat it up.

2
Pickles76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sure she “votes” if she’s on the Dem rolls.

11
South_Florida_Guy 11 points ago +11 / -0

He has a reelection coming up that he should win easily but I think he might be waiting until after it's done to make some of the moves on this and constitutional carry. Maybe not. I guess we'll see.

1
NateBedfordForrest 1 point ago +3 / -2

Did he kiss the wall or not? Asking for a fren

1
daveywavey86 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol ;)

2
NateBedfordForrest 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm in far less better shape with Cornhole and roller Abbott. But when are folk going to realize all politicians are worthless? Going all the way back to israhell lobbying in our affairs. It was a rhetorical question to begin with. Yes he put on the tiny yamaka and yes he kissed the wall shortly after netenyahoos taint.

3
Brickwell 3 points ago +3 / -0

DeSantis has publicly stated that if an open carry bill hits his desk he will sign it.

3
Jtenten 3 points ago +3 / -0

Constitutional carry IIRC

28
deleted 28 points ago +29 / -1
11
SHILL_DETECTOR 11 points ago +11 / -0

everytime an anaconda gets called out as being anaconda they NEVER argue with the accusation

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
SHILL_DETECTOR 4 points ago +4 / -0

even people who never saw his original account can detect his alts

its crazy

why does he keep coming back?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
8
BrunoPuntzJones 8 points ago +8 / -0

There are those who say that Anaconda is a group of fedfags. One thing is for sure, it exists only to spread division and disruption.

-7
OneBigMaga -7 points ago +1 / -8

You faggots really have a hard on for anaconda. You must be really gay.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-12
TRUMPoverturnedROEho -12 points ago +4 / -16

You Desantis dicksuckers love killing babies huh?

Why don’t you explain why he hasn’t banned abortion with a supermajority behind him?

2
Daddy_Knew_Best 2 points ago +2 / -0

banned abortion in FL better hit the headlines this week

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's a good question.

1
Tendies_or_GTFO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because governors don't write laws, retard. They sign them.

12
GunTottinPatriot 12 points ago +12 / -0

TOP KEK

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-1
OneBigMaga -1 points ago +1 / -2

So you are saying you are a liberal because you aren't going to answer the question about abortions?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-6
TRUMPoverturnedROEho -6 points ago +4 / -10

Not off topic, you cuck.

Desantis could ban abortion, but he simply doesn’t. If you’re going to REEEE and call Roberts a traitor then you’re committed to calling Desantis one too.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
entwickelnden 4 points ago +4 / -0

you're gonna need a bigger doll

121
BoughtByBloomberg2 121 points ago +123 / -2

Desantis is Desantis. Trump is Trump.

I like em both and there is no reason for us to let the left trick us into infighting.

Desantis had the BALLS to take on Disney. The corporation who has essentially ran all of Florida politics for over 50 years! He is tuned into the media war and social justice corruption. He saved Florida from Andrew Gillum. He is still a politician though and if he doesn't have to stick out his neck he won't.

Trump had the BALLS to take on THE ENTIRE FUCKING US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA GLOBOHOMO CONGLOMERATION! There simply is no comparison to what he represents. The choice of the common man. The collective FUCK YOU to the establishment of MILLIONS! He has his flaws. He believed in the system. That once he took office people would calm down and get down to business of running the nation properly. He did not expect entrenched deep state corruption sabotaging peace efforts because they believe to be stewards of the government holding it safe against the people. He did not expect media institutions would literally burn their profits and destroy their own companies and credibility just to lie about him.

Both will do great thing in the future.

There is no reason to choose between them. They synergise!

32
grassshrimp 32 points ago +32 / -0

Great post, I totally agree with your take.

27
freeamerica4ever 27 points ago +27 / -0

To be fair, I didn't expect those things either. I had no idea how deep the corruption went until Trump poked the beehive.

13
liberpede 13 points ago +13 / -0

I suspected it went deep.

The shocking part to me is the breadth...

We can't get a DOJ whistleblower to out Obamagate?

No one wants to pipe up?

I'm not shocked that there are people at the top who would do shit like this, but I used to think that kind of corruption would be hard to hide, because someone would cave to their conscience and spill the beans...

But their grip on the bureaucratic state seems near absolute.

We really do need to fire nearly everyone who works for the federal government. Seriously. 95%+.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
publius1788 1 point ago +1 / -0

What did they do?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Herecomedatpresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just looked up Thomas Drake and his Twitter feed is absolute cancer.

23
DAR1783 23 points ago +24 / -1

I used to think Trump belonged on Rushmore next to Washington. Now I think it's more like he should have his own Rushmore.
There's been NO ONE else like him. I saw the clip yesterday from one of the debates with hillbeast, where he said exactly what was going to happen: He would put in 2-3 Supreme Court judges and Roe would be overturned.
Promises made, promises kept.

4
Magabirdlady2 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s what the leftist, rhinos and the media want. They want to divide MAGA. We always have to be on guard and see it for what it is. Divide and conquer us. Personally I will feel much better when see Ron and Don together having dinner. It’s been awhile. We need to see unity. 😊

3
Marzieattaks 3 points ago +3 / -0

This should be stickied.

31
NomadicKrow2 31 points ago +32 / -1

They're all faggots to varying degrees. Roberts is just the biggest faggot. An anonymous source told me he went to Epstein's island to get railed in the ass by first term senators.

6
SolidSnakeOil 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'll just take that as hyperbole.

2
liberpede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thomas has seemed pretty reliable...

Do you assert that he carries a degree of faggotry?

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

They keep him in line by threatening him with another dose of Big Mike.

"NOOOOOO! Not again! I'll do anything!"

1
MAGA16062015 1 point ago +2 / -1

Anonymous source? He's on the flight list lol

As for kegstand kavanaught and muh rbgacb here's a daily reminder that they were complacent with the insurrection that took place on jan 20 2021

1
NomadicKrow2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean that my anonymous source told me he was there to get railed in the ass, not only to fuck kids.

20
hillaryprison 20 points ago +23 / -3

Kavanaugh and barrett are rinos though- they have been corrupted by the evil left.

10
ChickenInspector 10 points ago +12 / -2

I agree, I think abortion was an easy fruit although this was definitely the correct ruling. Now let's see if they have the balls to dismantle other parts of the federal government with the same precedent, I only have faith in Thomas to do so.

9
OGTD1 9 points ago +9 / -0

I see a disassociation of the three branches. The court rulings don’t matter when the DOJ is a hoard of demons. The good I felt beyond not killing children was that states rights are coming back to a time where it really mattered and people identified as their states destiny. The more power we remove from the Feds the better.

8
ThunderSizzle 8 points ago +8 / -0

They're not going to overturn Roe v Wade only to back down. Especially after the leak.

I'm curious if we're about to see an Era of the States from this Supreme Court.

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +6 / -1

What gets me is why is the Constitution interpreted different ways by different judges. I obviously like winning, but on any case whether we win or lose when it comes to the Constitution it should be because That's the Way It Was Written and the decision should be unanimous. Every time.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
kornesque 1 point ago +1 / -0

You must listen to Legalman.

2
COLDWARPATRIOT55 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gay marriage next. Thomas and Alito have hinted at it.

2
ChickenInspector 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good. Marriage is about raising children. Nothing to do with religion or homosexuals.

4
AnacronicA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they were essentially forced to agree because they are both supposedly Conservative and devote catholics. Coming out in favor of or simply not being against such a monumentally satanic act would've once and for all shown their true faces. Sure, everyone here knows the truth but millions of normies would've seen the truth, clear as day.

As further proof, Even CUCK Roberts wasn't willing to step out of line on this despite his previous screaming about not taking action in the Texas lawsuit because he feared rioting. Didn't stop him this time despite the threat being apparently much bigger than before.

3
King_Boobus_Toobus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point! Riots don't figure in now, why?

10
QuickHands 10 points ago +12 / -2

Florida has a right to privacy actually in their Constitution, not fabricated by a supreme court. They can only go so far or best believe DeSantis would have signed a bill a long ass time ago

Keep being a bitch though. Can't sign what isn't put on your desk, by the way, you fucking dumbass. Governors don't write bills.

12
AngryWriter 12 points ago +12 / -0

Does the right to privacy allow you to murder a houseguest who asks annoying questions? Or is it written in a way that only excuses the murder of the unborn?

3
publius1788 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah exactly, I don't think the right to privacy allows you to commit crimes without the government investigating.

1
QuickHands 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take it up with the Florida House and Senate, you're talking to me like I'm defending infanticide. I'm not, demonic murderer abortionists should be thrown off a cliff.

You can get rhetorical and pissy, or you can tell the truth. I'm on here telling the truth. Sorry if I offended you so much you have to move the goalposts instead of thinking NEXT STEPS

And NEXT STEPS is to convince as many Floridians as you can that they need a bill/referendum stating that right to privacy shall not be interpreted as or presumed to include any protections for abortion at any stage of fetal development.

4
MehNahMehNah 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think recognizing human life begins at conception and deserves consideration as an individual protected by the law needs to be brought up.

If killing a pregnant woman is double murder and anchor babies are (currently) a thing, this isn't a stretch.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

can someone explain how this privacy thing has to do with abortion? is it like you have a right not to have a visible baby bump or what??

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

The most baffling thing is how these courts perverted an implied "right to privacy" to mean you have the right to do things.

I really don't get it. Like, I understand why a right to privacy would make things difficult to enforce, but that doesn't make the law unconstitutional. I really don't understand that leap.

I also don't understand how the "right to privacy" is derived from the 14th amendment, instead of, you know, the 4th...

152
FuckReddit4545 152 points ago +152 / -0

Did I slip and hit my head? CA is going to shall issue?

67
Serp-Patriot [S] 67 points ago +67 / -0

Yep

79
citizen666 79 points ago +79 / -0

Except that you have to show “good morale character” by having 5 friends write a letter. So you have to tell 5 friends that you plan to carry—in California—which means you now have 3 fewer friends.

54
1inchgroup 54 points ago +54 / -0

Just join a Discord channel, you'll have 40 friends in no time XD

35
probablyacoincidence 35 points ago +35 / -0

Lol, just back out slowly when they fund a kidnapping of the governor and start pressuring you to write a manifesto

12
Wokism 12 points ago +12 / -0

Kek

Join my discord #hot4fedbois

4
probablyacoincidence 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol, amazing friend

1
almond_activator 1 point ago +1 / -0

and start pressuring you to write a manifesto

Nah, that's a ghostwrite-and-plant operation.

2
probablyacoincidence 2 points ago +2 / -0

They told me i just had to sign their rough draft, :/

5
RabidZoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not if you got permabanned in early Jan of '01 🤣

28
Philhelm 28 points ago +28 / -0

You have to have friends to exercise a right? That's fucked up.

15
MehNahMehNah 15 points ago +15 / -0

God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost should do.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
19
Pissed_American 19 points ago +19 / -0

I have a rejection letter from My sheriff (LA county) and I met all requirements including good moral character. I only was denied for not having "good cause". I didn't have friends vouch for me with any letters. I assume they must give it to me now because I met the requirements except the one the SCOTUS said is illegal which is the good cause requirement basically meaning you have to fit whatever vague requirements that are never specific.

7
BigErnMcCracken 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can you apply in OC or do you need to have residency there, I forgot. When I was there the OC sheriff was based

10
TheDTOMDon 10 points ago +10 / -0

Riverside sheriff has a policy of encouraging people to apply for CCW. He wants as many people as possible armed to protect themselves and others. He’s explicitly stated such.

5
brassmule 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can only apply to the county Sheriff in the county that you reside.

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was actually about to apply in San Bernardino since we own a property there. But I would have had to go get a new D.L. at that address.

2
citizen666 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get on that! Process differs by county, even though it’s illegal under state law for it to differ by jurisdiction, but who’s got the money to sue?

1
TrumpoWon2020 1 point ago +5 / -4

You should just leave and move to a better state with freedom. That sheriff should be burned alive for refusing to grant 2A rights to his constituents.

3
EvJohn 3 points ago +3 / -0

You misspelled "denying".

1
TrumpoWon2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

*that sheriff should be burned alive for refusing to grant 2A rights

Better? Denying and refusing as synonymous. They can be used interchangeably.

6
anonanomous 6 points ago +6 / -0

Granting and rights don’t belong in the same sentence bro.

They’re rights. They’re not granted. They’re withheld from the government fucking with them. I think that was his point.

That sheriff should be burned alive for infringing on your 2A rights and not just saying “bro why are you even putting in an application for a license to bear arms when clearly the 2A says shall not be infringed - I got your back bro if anyone gives any of my citizens any shit I will come at them with guns blazing”

4
EvJohn 4 points ago +4 / -0

The right is extant irrespective of the sheriff. Therefore he cannot grant it. In other words, it's already been granted (an inalienable right from God).

Your giving him the ability to "grant" is what I object to.

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

We plan to. Alot has happened to us personally and to our family kind of kept us stuck here. I have a pretty good life and everything and everyone we know is here. At least hopefully now I can be able to protect myself and my family (legally). Until we can get out.

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

It took me about 2 years to talk the wife into moving. But, here we are, we packed up everything and moved clear across the country. Tell you what, I'll force my wife to talk to yours if that would help. I'll just tell her its her dad and then I'll run away.

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's actually down to leave too. But since we had our son last year, we've been kind of dependant on the help we get from family. Also the pandemic kind of fucked us a little bit financially.

1
trumpORbust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take Back

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh?

I'm tired of faggots suggesting they stay in their commie state while also saying state rights Trump federal rights. Thre states were given power greater than the federal government so that they could supersede a corrupt government. But it also means states like California, New York, and Maryland can marginalize their citizens. The only response is FUCKING LEAVE!

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't even have 1 friend. I would just carry regardless.

I just had a job interview this week and they said I'd have to work in California for up to 4 months. I laughed so hard tears started pouring from my eyes. When I finally regained control I told the interviewer he would need to pay me half a million dollars to even consider that, I told him to fuck off, and I hung up on him.

3
trump4e 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously? I don't see that as an issue though. A bit extreme, however. Here in NY you just need like 3 references whom I believe they prob don't even call lol

7
brassmule 7 points ago +7 / -0

In Delaware, you have to pay to run a classified ad in a newspaper with at least 35% circulation in your zip code. In the ad you have to include your application for a concealed carry license, and include your name and home address.

This has to be done at least 10 days before you apply and you have to have a signed affidavit from the newspaper that you did it, along with a copy of the paper in which it ran.

See here: https://www.courts.delaware.gov/forms/download.aspx?ID=33278

5
AngeredKabar 5 points ago +6 / -1

Wow.

That's worse than NY I think.

4
brassmule 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup. The ENTIRE point of concealed carry is that it is CONCEALED. Nobody - except those paying close attention if you're printing too much - knows you are armed and it's best that you keep it that way.

Delaware gives people a map of where homes are that have guns stored in them. It's ridiculous.

3
WhineTasting 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not just ridiculous, but endangering the lives of the people residing at the published addresses. Criminals out to burgle guns basically have their shopping list made out for them by the state. That's beyond ridiculous.

2
Newuser99 2 points ago +2 / -0

In AZ I just got my CCW. Just a class and fingerprints is required

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
1inchgroup 5 points ago +5 / -0

My brains hurt now. What?!?

3
entwickelnden 3 points ago +3 / -0

yup, then they will use it to blame the rise in gun violence that has been going on the last year. just like biden blames putin for gas prices.

3
Asun 3 points ago +3 / -0

What will happen to Cali's gay ass 10 rd magazine limit?

2
lixa 2 points ago +2 / -0

And their allowed guns list. That is BS.

For those who don't know, it means that guns that are not reviewed are illegal, even if they are functionally the same as ones on the allowed list. The roster seems to be limited in size too, so it's not really expanded I believe.

1
citizen666 1 point ago +1 / -0

Such bullshit, a Glock 43X is $500 in Nevada. $1200 in CA, if you can find one.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never intentionally tried to buy a Glock, but I know it's true in general.

2
Original_Dankster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm really surprised that they're bending the knee on this one. I thought California would defy the ruling.

2
FauciOuchi 2 points ago +3 / -1

Free money if you sue though

2
LostViking1985 2 points ago +2 / -0

They know they can't defy the supreme court, and there will now be many strong and expensive challenges to CA's gun control efforts. They will need all their resources. It still won't be enough.

103
kent 103 points ago +106 / -3

This is just the beginning. Next we're going to do away with red flag laws, 10 day waiting period, gun roster, high capacity magazine ban and assault weapons ban. When they try to require you do training every 6 months with a specific caliber for your CCW permit that should be challenged in court too because where does the US constitution say you must be trained to have a right?

60
ChickenInspector 60 points ago +60 / -0

We need the SC to rule (correctly) that most of the federal government is invalid and should be dissolved.

Then we obtain payroll information to find out who was employed by the federal government.

Then we investigate all of them from criminal behavior. Treason begets executions.

28
K-Harbour 28 points ago +28 / -0

10 year lifetime max working for government

Ineligible to vote while working for government

12
Quietam_Unum 12 points ago +12 / -0

Rescind JFK's 1962 Executive Order 10988

9
Ep1ctetus 9 points ago +9 / -0

This. Public unions should not exist.

8
24601 8 points ago +10 / -2

Amend that to include...

  • 10 year lifetime limit on a Security Clearance for civilian employees.
2
lixa 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is good. Add that all raises go to referendum or tied to average citizen's salary.

1
NippleSalad 1 point ago +1 / -0

terrible idea, "working for government" includes maintaining sewer, making the lines at least move in the DMV, paving some of the roads, our representatives do not work for government, they are government so your wording is ineffective. You want term limits so all non-representative government construction workers and pencil pushers can keep their profession, there's no reason to tell some gov't Building's janitor he can only work for 10 years.

2
I_lost_my_password 2 points ago +2 / -0

The real fraud and theft is not pushed out via 'employment' though. It's all back channel crap.

2
ChickenInspector 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, but they have to get their people in via employment. They're very blatant these days with it.

But yeah I agree that their entire budgeting needs to be looked at although I'm sure they can file payments to antifa under "lighting" or something.

9
Logbas34 9 points ago +9 / -0

The ASA needs to to revamp a case against suppressors with the NFA. Tired of waiting 150+ days with a F4 trust.

Gun laws are stupid, but the NFA is Sotomayor stupid.

5
Kwdzr 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why does anyone need permission to carry in the first place? That should be the first thing challenged.

3
AmericaAllDay 3 points ago +3 / -0

10 day wait period, assault weapons ban, and any training required will be easiest to remove. Good luck to you. In FL some counties have 5 day wait periods which really equates to 8 days. It's so ridiculous.

1
kent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I doubt waiting periods really stop anything too. If someone really wants to do something with a gun the waiting period isn't going to cool them off.

2
Drewniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Replying for archive. Great point.

where does the US constitution say you must be trained to have a right?

62
deleted 62 points ago +66 / -4
18
ccxn 18 points ago +18 / -0

Trump was one of the best presidents of all time

5
julianleroux 5 points ago +5 / -0

Best in 200 years?

2
lixa 2 points ago +3 / -1

At best these picks have been disappointing. They've gotten it right a few times, but it's not the ideal situation.

48
TrumpoWon2020 48 points ago +50 / -2

"Proof of good cause" is such a laughable joke. 2A or defense of one's family isn't "good cause"?

Someone should murder that mother fucker.

27
SpezDispenser 27 points ago +27 / -0

Good cause should be "Soros DAs," end of application.

12
StraightWhiteCisMale 12 points ago +13 / -1

The only good cause in CA is being rich or famous… esp. if you’re a demoncrat politician

8
_Sully_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

I had a very good cause but I made the mistake of saying I like to camp in remote locations where I had concern for wild life. I needed to have pics of me in a remote location from in the past 1.5 years. I didn't have such pics because one, I don't take random pics of myself and two, I was avoiding going to remote locations because I had no gun.

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +5 / -1

We're waiting for you in Florida, Arizona, Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, etc. Join us brother. Get out of that hell. I know its tough, but I did it, i upended my entire life to get out and the pieces still aren't back together but you know what is? I carry a gun just to bring the trash out now and it's fully legal. People open carry in Walmart. I can own anything I want. And i have never been happier.

5
_Sully_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

My wife and I bought a property in Tennessee. I still need to finish out the year to save up some cash before I fully commit. I'm comin'.

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Awesome!!! I did the same, I cut all my expenses and saved up lots of money before pulling the plug and leaving.

My wife actually was the one who found a new job and her new company paid for the move. Minus about $7K to transport my, ahem, more personal hardware.... which was done via RV and a 10 day trip where I was able to visit some family.

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moving across the country is a big ordeal. We did it years ago and were lucky enough to time everything just right. The key is to purge most of your crap so that what's left can fit in a 28' Upack trailer or smaller, then purchase what you need when you get to your new place.

1
_Sully_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, that's great, pede.

2
Itscrazytime 2 points ago +2 / -0

I live in the central valley in california. The sheriff in my county and the 3 surrounding counties hand out CCW's left and right. Its a 4 month wait because of all the applications constantly being processed. My proof of good cause was "I want to use my 2nd amendment right for self defense."

Not all of California is a bunch of insane leftists. We really need to split this state into 3 like was proposed a few years ago.

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

God... I'm so sorry. Central cali is literally the worst place to live. Filled with gangs and pedophiles and crime is rampant. Sorry you have to live there.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Literally no, it isn't if you ask judges. Someone was denied because they weren't robbed recently enough.

40
DarkPepe1776 40 points ago +40 / -0

This is like a domino effect or something. Winning winning winning

What's next? The rightful president put back for the 2nd term that he definitely won? Make it so!

14
substantialmajestic 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is exactly why they fear Trump. The dominos just keep falling.

26
Drewniverse 26 points ago +26 / -0

I can only take so much excitement for one day. This is coom level. As a lifelong Californian it will be my civic duty to obtain a CCW permit.

14
Pissed_American 14 points ago +14 / -0

Same for me. It will be even more sweet because I was denied back in March by the sheriff for not having "good cause". They admitted I have good enough moral character tho. I even spoke on the phone to the Sgt who rejected me and I told him it's the least he could do after his department failed my family by taking over 30 minutes to respond to a home invasion we were victims of. "He's like well when was that? Oh it happened when you were a kid,? Why are you even bringing that up then" Maybe because it tends to stick with you, dickhead! And really makes you lose faith in the police ever coming to protect you when you need them most. (Good thing my parents did have a gun)

3
Fidget 3 points ago +3 / -0

Police aren’t required to protect anybody, they’re required (kinda) to arrest the guy who caved your skull in.

Supreme Court ruled this many times now.

I'm fine with this ruling, as IMO it lends more credence to 2A.

2
Pissed_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Assholes. "We won't protect you, but don't you dare even THINK about protecting yourself, only were allowed to do that". And they wonder why they lost support.

24
Adwest232323 24 points ago +24 / -0

The waitlist is gonna be long, how many million applicants will there be?

13
K-Harbour 13 points ago +13 / -0

Now, they will have a list for CA that they can use….

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

My thoughts exactly.

2
SHILL_DETECTOR 2 points ago +2 / -0

always invest in gun companies when democrats get power....always

22
Kaarous 22 points ago +22 / -0

Ha ha get wriggity wrecked, liberals.

20
Snack_Destroyer 20 points ago +20 / -0

Now get rid of the need for a license at all.

19
Liberals_R_Idiots 19 points ago +19 / -0

But I thought California is a commie shithole so why would they do this?

37
Pdjco658 37 points ago +37 / -0

it's because New York lost the case. They can't require you provide an explanation in order to apply for a ccw.

18
DeplorableCentipede 18 points ago +18 / -0

They could have waited for someone to sue them, but they probably figured it was a lost cause after the New York precedent.

11
QuickHands 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're such a deep blue state that paying out court settlements will 95% of the time be literally taking money from Democrats (taxpayer base) to give to Republicans (who file suit)

Cali has lost most of their rich Republicans, so they can't just bleed the treasury dry without hurting their own base the most. Fucking assholes.

4
Pepper2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Best explanation

5
Farage_massage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Did they need another lawsuit? Surely the SCOTUS decision wasn’t state specific?

1
DeplorableCentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

The decision is state specific, but with the precedent it set, any lower court would most likely rule against California.

1
Pdjco658 1 point ago +1 / -0

exactly and it would almost be exactly the same facts in the case.

6
dres3 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe they still want a california after the peaceful protests.

1
K-Harbour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might not need so many police if enough of the public carry….

3
SpezDispenser 3 points ago +3 / -0

No choice?

2
BoomShtick 2 points ago +2 / -0

California is a commie shithole. Do not fret, I am sure they will be tightening where they can (mag cap, gun roster, raising prices), they may have lost a battle, but the fuckery will continue for decades until the challenges are heard by SCOTUS once again, or god forbid, the deep state starts gaining ground.

1
entwickelnden 1 point ago +1 / -0

so they can blame the rise in violence on it? just like biden blaming putin for gas. As much as i love these wins, have you guys lost your critical thinking skills? If something doesnt make sense, theres likely more to the story.

14
user365927285937 14 points ago +16 / -2

Good cause: “black people”

Sorry based blackpedes but you know it’s true

4
BoomShtick 4 points ago +4 / -0

just the joggers.

12
BoughtByBloomberg2 12 points ago +12 / -0

BEST PRIDE MONTH EVAH!!!!!

12
NonyaDB 12 points ago +12 / -0

Now they'll just deny permits for lack of "good moral character" as soon as they do an internet search on your name and find where you posted something silly as an edgy teen in high school.

9
Serp-Patriot [S] 9 points ago +10 / -1

In this case SCOTUS usually expedites the rulings and snacks down the lower courts for trying this type of fuckery

9
kent 9 points ago +10 / -1

After reading the letter I'd say they're pushing a lengthy purity test on what is good moral character that is unconstitutional. If someone has the ability to legally buy a gun that should be the only determination they've got the good moral character to carry it in public.

2
RedAltoids 2 points ago +2 / -0

Especially considering their take on morality.

4
FliesTheFlag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Country Sheriff still signs off on them, they can tell you no for anything they don't like on the application like your shitty references.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

You shouldn't need references. This isn't a nanny job it's a god-given right.

3
kent 3 points ago +5 / -2

They can't deny based on that once taken to court again and made to prove that fits in the text, history and tradition of the 2A.

1
Fidget 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m sure they will so it’ll be interesting seeing it contested through the courts.

1
kent 1 point ago +1 / -0

They took what was said about good moral character and turned it into a wall of red tape.

12
Flipakademsarepedos 12 points ago +12 / -0

We have had so much winning lately I love it!!!!!!

11
LoneStarPede 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fantastic! Now let's hear some good news about our southern border. We're clearly on a roll here!

11
cpt_majestic2 11 points ago +11 / -0

San Bernardino County Sheriff's office,,,,,,Please hold

4
1inchgroup 4 points ago +4 / -0

OC is legit too

4
cpt_majestic2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have a few coworkers in OC, say it's beyond easy

1
eli5_pants 1 point ago +1 / -0

OC here. It's basically just a fee

1
Ipray4potus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kern county!!!

10
Meddlesom 10 points ago +10 / -0

Good Cause?

"want to star in western movie but I really dislike the prop girl."

7
CrystalLakeBushWackr 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can you feel it!? 😀

6
RogueLeaderX 6 points ago +6 / -0

HERE COMES THE BOOM!

6
Snugmeatsocks 6 points ago +6 / -0

I hope they cried the whole time writing this.

6
mdexile 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now do Maryland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3
Buff_cousin_Elroy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Soon

1
easyonthefiber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mdshooters forum has updated links and guides as of an hour ago. Basically follow the process but reference the recent SCOTUS decision. Still need fingerprints (Live scan), photos, and 16hrs of training.

What I want to see is CCW holders overwhelm these formerly “may issue” states with non-resident requests until those states start reciprocity agreements to reduce the administrative burden on their state police or sheriff offices.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
salt-collector 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because the state doesnt have enough money to pay all the lawsuits that would be coming so they had to do this. Fuxkkng kek man

6
nomoreprinkles 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shouldn't need a fucking license to carry to begin with

5
bananafone 5 points ago +5 / -0

I refuse to believe this.

No fucking way

1
kent 1 point ago +2 / -1
4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

Public carrying of a fetus?

4
Beer-_-Belly 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you are in CA, apply ASAP. The will change the law at the first chance.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

How are sheriffs going to get thousands of dollars in free ipads??? (Yes, this happened.)

3
liberpede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you guys think "shall issue" will be good enough for the strength of right Thomas has outlined?

Is there another constitutional right the state is allowed to require you to get a government permission slip before you can exercise?

Or does that fall quite plainly into the lane of making it a "second class right" that Justice Thomas warns about?

I mean, to me, the answer is obvious: that's unconstitutional af.

Does anyone think the court might go that far in the next decade?

3
tiffany46 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does this also end the handgun ban in DC?

3
BigErnMcCracken 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now get rid of the 10 round mag limit and 10 day waiting period that always turned into a month for me

1
Serp-Patriot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you purchased magazines during freedom week they are legal, if the magazine doesn't have a manufacturer date there is no way for law enforcement to know when they were purchased....search "California freedom week magazines"

3
scruffyusp 3 points ago +3 / -0

CONGRATS CALIFORNIA!

3
LawlAndDisorder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have been wondering if this can be applied to silencers in Washington. Currently, they simply don’t issue the stamp and have effectively banned them. The work around is a trust, but I would like to see more states get a bloody nose.

3
D0ntdrugtest 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh so you still have to pay for your right

3
Extwenytooo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who's the AG in CA?

4
Pissed_American 4 points ago +4 / -0

A fag named Rob Bonta. Previously another fag named Xavier Becerra. He's in the Biden administration now. And before that was you know who Kumala Harris

3
2224522 3 points ago +3 / -0

California official decides who is of good moral character. Now that’s a joke in and of itself. So they even know what morals are? Transvestites are NOT OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER. Neither are pedophiles child pornographers, porn production.

3
kmillz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can someone ELI5 what that means?

2
ProPatria 2 points ago +2 / -0

Basically telling Commiefornia government to start issuing the damned permits - no more stalling/denying bullshit. Good news!

1
kmillz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok maybe ELI2 i don't know anything about these permits. Why do they matter?

3
Spawnlingman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thibk all of this was on purpose. The fbi probably has 100 false flags set up that will only happen in CA, MD, NY. All will look like accidental discharges by new carriers.

2
Barthaneous 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very possible

3
DarkPepe1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

2 Questions: Remember when Trump said he could make all this go away in a certain amount of time if he were in office? If memory serves me right...did he say 30 minutes?

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if he said 30 minutes, maybe, but he did say he could and fast. What is your point?

1
DarkPepe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

No point. Genuinely just curious.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I pray we see it in action!

3
killerkram 3 points ago +3 / -0

In California? Whaaa? at the end of pride month we get this and the abortion decision? Praise God!

2
Skabliggum2 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about Maryland? It's a shitty state for gun owners.

2
burritolivesmatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's this mean?

2
thisisatestof2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best pride month ever.

2
waxonwaxoff87 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a celebrity or politician can enjoy the protection of firearms, so can the common citizen.

2
One_Eyed_Willy 2 points ago +2 / -0

CA pede here, gun owner. TY TY TY ... going to fill out for a CCW

2
brotatofarmer 2 points ago +6 / -4

Yeah... The only reason this happens is because they are encouraging antifa to strap and clap

3
Pepper2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not with their criminal records, besides Antifa just carries illegally as we have seen. I know you've been hurt, but It's okay to win one sometimes.

2
mikethemarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

this will be great from this decision, cause gun crimes will drop in the toilet, cause all the stats for most gun crimes was from these state laws saying you DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE A GUN ON YOU, Crime will go down cause legal citizens will have guns and criminals will think twice before attacking them, lowering the crime rate and these same people won't become a part of the crime stats

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just woke up, not seeing things straight yet. Did this just say California is pulling their head out of their ass finally?

2
lixa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just a little bit.

2
MagaDistributor 2 points ago +2 / -0

proof of a good cause

The greatest good is a well armed populace Communist scum.

2
Drwuzer 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll still slow walk the application process.