3366
Comments (392)
sorted by:
112
-f-b-i- [M] 112 points ago +114 / -2 stickied
358
BillPigg 358 points ago +364 / -6

We are ruled by the unelected and unaccountable.

148
Microaggresor 148 points ago +148 / -0

This would end that.

112
saltyviewer123 112 points ago +114 / -2

Maybe. I have a feeling it would require the use of some kind of force because they aren't just going to get up and run away when facing charges of treason.

122
Microaggresor 122 points ago +123 / -1

I agree. This is a really big deal. In all honesty, this is the kind of shit that triggers civil wars. This could explain why Nancy Pants has been going out of her way to call the Supremes "Extremists".

In other words, I think it's almost go time.

65
saltyviewer123 65 points ago +68 / -3

Civil war is what "they" want. Somehow "they" are arranging this to be on their terms. Imagine if we didn't play their game but still removed these corrupt bastards from power.

84
Captain_MAGA 84 points ago +85 / -1

They want a civil war to avoid a revolutionary war.

28
wblboo 28 points ago +28 / -0

They want a civil war so they can call in the UN and the CCP - But woe be to them if they show up.

We will defeat them all and then follow them home and grind their countries into dust.

6
user365927285937 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don’t forget the Vatican. That place is a festering den of evil.

6
SaddleTramp 6 points ago +7 / -1

Hot shit

4
HadrianTheGreat 4 points ago +4 / -0

100%

28
saltyviewer123 28 points ago +29 / -1

That is an exceptional comment. +2

13
Backroomslevel9 13 points ago +13 / -0

I could only give +1. I even right clicked....

12
MatthiasBlack 12 points ago +12 / -0

A Revolutionary War is just a Civil War won by the party not currently in power.

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

A revolutionary war can mean fighting a foreign power that took over your country. See American, French, and Irish revolutions. But it can also mean a civil war, see Russian revolution. A civil war can only mean against your own country. So there is a difference but I admit it's a little blurry.

2
Wallypip3 2 points ago +2 / -0

The civil war needs to happen first. Sorry, but there's no rebuilding the country with leftists.

33
Microaggresor 33 points ago +33 / -0

I don't think this right here is on their terms.

36
Jasonshaw1776 36 points ago +36 / -0

That 2a ruling was a kick in the balls to the establishment class/deep state crowd.

39
Microaggresor 39 points ago +39 / -0

This will be a stranglehold if that was a kick in the nuts. If this happens, the supreme court is giving the country back to us.

10
2AMOFO 10 points ago +11 / -1

This ruling could repeal the NFA.

5
MasklessMarvel [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

guns, babies, the church- they need more balls to kick

31
Nerdrem1 31 points ago +32 / -1

If a civil war pops off I'll take any opportunity I get to take out anyone that held any political office before it started, no matter what side they claim to be on.

Look at the Russian revolution with the reds and whites, the whites still recognized aristocratic titles and put those people in positions of power to their own detriment, and the reds won. 100% of the democrats and 95%+ of the republicans are worthless incompetents and the only way forward is without them.

25
howdydodat 25 points ago +25 / -0

Great call. Next, do the news media.

12
AnacronicA 12 points ago +13 / -1

The media are nothing but puppets. Cut off the head of the snake and they will collapse and flee. Let none escape!

6
disgruntled_patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh, don't worry. I've got those sick fucks in my sights.

9
wblboo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Here's to: A Promise made, A Promise kept.

5
Llanos 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good luck. These people have massive resources and will field their own small armies.

I'm not saying don't do it. Just that it won't be easy and you will need a lot of help.

15
Drcm 15 points ago +15 / -0

there is almost no alternative at this point

9
GabeC1997 9 points ago +10 / -1

Specifically, foreign nations know that the only chance they'll have against America is if it's also fighting against itself.

1
Wallypip3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh they know this? How do they know this?

2
GabeC1997 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because American citizens have more guns than the rest of the world's militaries combined.

1
DrainNIH2 1 point ago +7 / -6

And they all get off scot free for Covid tyranny, border failures, $30T debt, destruction of our precious environment by permitting long lasting toxins to be grandfathered in, child trafficking, purposeful destruction of our food plants, the utter failures of fiat banking, massive voter fraud, Blackrock, the J6 detainee atrocities, and destruction of black families and communities. Are we really going to allow ourselves to go to a war They Want to cover up for their endless failures? No! We must Not go to war - civil or revolutionary. We must continue to expose their crimes to the World, for future generations to see. Play them on loop on every channel TV or internet. Remember also we said, Never Forget: 9-11, Waco, OK bombing, LasVegas Sandy Hook, Uvdale, et al., and all other domestic terror acts perpetrated on the American People.

Thus: NO WAR. IT'S WHAT THEY WANT. INSTEAD: TAKE BACK THE MEDIA AND EXPOSE. EXPOSE.
EXPOSE.

Give this country a chance to rise up Real Leaders, not just the Puppets They will install on a post-war traumatized America. Wake Up! My God, people, You must wake.up! We must end this cycle of communist subversion once and for all. jmo

3
Scansin_DAVE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not quite sure what you are thinking this will do. These scumbags only understand one thing. That's why they want our 2A so bad. The media will never let the exposing info to get out. So, then what? I agree that war should be our last resort but right now, I don't see many other options. Midterms and deep investigations would be great but I don't trust anyone to do them anymore. Our DOJ is corrupt to it's core. FBI is even worse. I can't imagine the CIA is any better. We need to find a way to take back our Federal Government and then end all these depts and agencies. Then, we must remove all corruption and how do you think that happens? They just turn themselves in? They go in willingly? No, unless we go the NATIONAL DIVORCE route, it's gonna be bloody.

1
disgruntled_patriot 1 point ago +3 / -2

Go fuck yourself Trust The Plan (TM) shill.

1
Llanos 1 point ago +2 / -1

How many more decades do we try and take back things the right way that were stolen?

You old people don't get it. When you are playing chess with someone and you clearly see them cheating. Cheating to the point they don't even try to hide it anymore. You don't keep playing by the rules.

You flip the fucking chessboard over and punch them in the face.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

it Was go time when they started attacking churches

4
disgruntled_patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was go time a million times over within the last two years alone.

2
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 2 points ago +2 / -0

So when will you start "going"?

1
BaldyGull 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what the supremes have to say back. https://youtu.be/Aax5EDQMOq4

30
ModernKnight 30 points ago +31 / -1

And this assumes Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett don't stab us in the back like with the Kung Flu mandates for medical workers. I'm super hyped about Roe v Wade and the 2nd Amendment decisions, but I won't be convinced they will rule correctly on this until I see the ruling.

49
saltyviewer123 49 points ago +50 / -1

Never forget we got handed "NO STANDING" at every turn when trying to expose election fraud.

12
ProphetOfKek 12 points ago +12 / -0

Standing and latches and moot, oh my!

5
saltyviewer123 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is it a bad thing I heard the voice of George Takei after re-reading your comment.

5
ProphetOfKek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well the courts were exceptionally faggy during that time!

4
MrDonaldTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

They were moo cases. Like a cow's opinion. It doesn't matter.

https://youtu.be/mAhXOmvcQpg

5
AnacronicA 5 points ago +5 / -0

I still wonder, why did they fearlessly come together and give us these landmark victories despite an unprecedented leak and enormous pressure, far greater than what they had during the Texas Lawsuit.

3
madagea 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have been wondering this also and you are the first I have seen comment that.Is there actually something going on in the background because as you say,a lot of pressure as the regime installed in the Whitehouse wants the opposite of the SC decisions..who knows

4
Milkman1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, things are turning so fast that I have thought the same. Why are they doing the "right thing" all of a sudden? Pay attention pedes! Something big may be coming! Oh, don't forget your windage and elevation!

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

are you balmy?

Trump is behind all this

5
Liberals_R_Idiots 5 points ago +5 / -0

This ☝🏻

4
Autist_of_Kiev 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still think Paxton should sue the SC.

-7
MasklessMarvel [S] -7 points ago +1 / -8

oh give this shit up

5
saltyviewer123 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm just trying to say we shouldn't have unreasonable expectations when it comes to SCOTUS.

0
MasklessMarvel [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

🤦‍♂️

5
BidensPrisonWallet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same here. This is the one that matters most.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

this would eliminate the authority of the HHS and thus could remove the medical worker mandates

-4
MasklessMarvel [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

doomers gotta doom

3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, super hyped about recent decisions, but realistic outlook regarding past decisions so saying I'll wait for the actual decision to come down. Super doomy. Total doom and gloom. No hope boohoo. Total doomfaggotry.

2
MasklessMarvel [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

why do you think they kept this buried til the end, after the libs were all riled up about guns and baby killing?

the moron libtards have no clue what is at stake here

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nobody is going to get treason charges if this goes the way we want, can we stop with the Great Awakening silly bullshit?

And, it won't require "force", because it's a change of policy and authority. It just happens. It puts responsibility back into the hands of Congress. The agencies will still exist, but they will have no power, and greatly reduced budgets, because Congress will have to specifically fund them.

Put more effort into understanding what this actually is, and will play out, than Great Awakening masturbatory fantasies.

1
saltyviewer123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny how I'm getting piled on about Great Awakening when I have nothing to do with it.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe because you post idiotic crap like they do? Hmmm?

1
saltyviewer123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell it to them. GA masturbatory fantasies aren't my specialties but I am learning. 🙄

3
edxzxz 3 points ago +3 / -0

They'll go home when they stop getting paid to show up at the office.

4
Boom2cannon 4 points ago +5 / -1

Partially. This is Washington DC we're talking about....a swamp-like place where the loophole's loopholes have loopholes.

1
SteveRogers42 1 point ago +1 / -0

“This is not the end. It is not the beginning of the end. It is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.”

3
NotAHandshake 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's hilarious is all the leftists lately suddenly saying that exact same sort of thing about SCOTUS.

"RREEEE THE JUSTICES WERE NEVER FAIRLY AND SECURELY AND ROBUSTLY AND FORTIFIEDLY ELECTED ITS NOT FAIR REEEEEE"

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

KAVANAUGH LIKES BEER!

3
Plazma10 3 points ago +4 / -1

Literally rulers mean measures that give and take away value. That's why the banks, MBAs and lawyers are important in our society. I refuse to be ruled

2
buckeyeminuteman 2 points ago +2 / -0

And unelectable.

117
LtPatterson 117 points ago +117 / -0

The ATF will not like this one bit.

44
GEOTUSMAGA 44 points ago +44 / -0

Hide your dogs.

19
Autist_of_Kiev 19 points ago +19 / -0

Okay, dog has been disassembled and buried in the backyard in Sch80 PCV pipes, now what?

27
saltyviewer123 27 points ago +29 / -2

Don't forget the IRS! If true a SCOTUS ruling that strikes down the authority of 3 letter agencies is a gigantic green light for citizens to tell the IRS to go fuck themselves and the federal collapse will begin.

20
fakthemods3 20 points ago +20 / -0

And that's why if the ruling is in our favor it will be limited in scope.

13
caw_86 13 points ago +13 / -0

Unfortunately, congress did pass laws for tax

20
dr_gonzo 20 points ago +20 / -0

Ya the 16th amendment set the income tax in stone, which is EXACTLY why we must repeal it. There's NO WAY AROUND THAT if we expect to have a free country again.

You cannot have a free society where the government has claim of ownership over people's labor. It's that simple. It's a form of SLAVERY.

5
caw_86 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would compromise with the abolishment of all residential property tax

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dammit.

4
FireannDireach 4 points ago +4 / -0

It doesn't say or do that, at all. It just means Congress can only make/change laws and policies the agencies follow and has to be be transparent about funding.

It doesn't strike down the authority of an agency, like the ability to collect taxes. That power is set by law, by the Congress, and this decision doesn't touch it, at all. It strikes down the agencies ability to self-govern and set policy and regulation without Congressional oversight.

This doesn't remove agencies, or change their mission, which is set by law - the DEA will not lose it's powers, like being able to arrest, but they cannot change or go beyond that without Congress specifically crafting legislation over it, like they can now. The Congress is already broken, so throwing all of the decisions of policy and authority back to Congress will break them, because they'll be in session 365 days a year, as the article says, and they're already glacial. And this will GUT funding, like Biden's massive cash grab to fund thousands of new IRS agents that's in the bad gun safety legislation. Dems won't be able to create slush funds through agency programs. That's YUGE right there.

And, like the article says, this opens the door for massive, groundbreaking lawsuits for past actions by three letter agencies overstepping their bounds. The EPA would be tied up in court for hundreds if not thousands of years from the flood of lawsuits from people and entities they've abused.

A lot of what is coming out of the White House and Congress is the same "throw it to the agencies and open the money floodgates" bullshit Obama did - because he's behind it. And this decision, if they favor Virginia, stops all of it in it's tracks.

5
Jtenten 5 points ago +6 / -1

This begs the question: which agencies are exempt from this and where do those responsibilities fall when the agencies dissolve?

14
Chemicaltackle23 14 points ago +14 / -0

Over 240 agencies and departments. Each and every single authority reg or mandate. Would have to be debated and voted on for congressional approval. That's why it's never gonna happen imo . Nobody just gives up that much power

10
VoidWanderer 10 points ago +10 / -0

That becomes the "ok, enforce it" situation. The supreme court could rule that those agencies need to be dissolved, but without someone to enforce that it's toothless. The feds aren't going to just police themselves.

3
MightyEighth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wouldn’t that make it easier for the average American to sue against these agencies easily? Or your state legislature could refuse to allow the operations of these agencies within their borders.

I don’t think either of these would happen but idk

3
VoidWanderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, say you sue them. How does the court in your state enforce that judgement provided you win? It's the exact same thing. The only group that could do something impactful are the states themselves, and that depends on how forceful they want to be considering they're risking a heavy chunk of their budget because of things like federal education funding.

That's the whole problem and why the founding fathers didn't want the government to balloon ridiculously like it has.

1
MightyEighth 1 point ago +1 / -0

I completely agree that this wouldn’t do much at a high level, I do believe that some (few I would guess) extremely based states would limit or remove some of these agencies from their borders though. Or that state politicians could run on that premise and see a lot of success down the line.

At the very least it would give a new focus to our local MAGA movements, limiting or removing these influences would go so far for our cause and be a good step at saving this national.

1
hospitalier 1 point ago +1 / -0

The old Andrew Jackson.... "The Supreme Court Has Ruled... Now Let Them Enforce It"

1
IAmNotAnAutist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't have to enforce it.

States will just ignore their rules. The agencies will have to enforce it, but won't be able to because no one will back them other than people from other agencies, who will also be on the ignore list.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +2 / -1

The court is not ruling that the agencies be dissolved. They're ruling that they don't have the unlimited power they claim now. Read the article. Read the suit. Nowhere is the phrase "dissolve agencies" mentioned, and SCOTUS doesn't have that kind of power.

-1
MasklessMarvel [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

the agencies involved are basically those run by the various cabinet departments

they will continue as they are with the exception that all of their rules and mandates must be voted on by congress

we will have to see what happens to existing regulations

5
ClarenceBeeks 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our corrupt congress would try to pass 1 sweeping bill to approve all prior rules if possible.

3
The_Usurper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hoes mad

2
Bramage 2 points ago +2 / -0

not a legit agency to begin with.

88
mnguy12000 88 points ago +88 / -0

Please let this happen

27
Chesteraarthur2 27 points ago +27 / -0

It will. This is the kind of thing even Roberts indicates he wants to rein in. I predict a 6-3 decision.

14
MightyEighth 14 points ago +14 / -0

I expect 9-0 with Jeb as the only judge

5
acasper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nine headed all-knowing Jeb is going to be a villain in my next D&D campaign. Thanks.

3
MightyEighth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy shit I just commented on another post about DnD that’s wild lol

Also epic boss

2
Fidget 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s been more than four hours, time to call the Doc!

1
goldkeyboardwarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe this is the real reason the left is trying to delegitimize the Supreme Court over Roe v. Wade being overturned right now. Elites will always have the ability to get an abortion for their side pieces no matter how illegal the country makes them (even if you disregard it still being legal in blue states) but those agencies being neutered would strip them of a lot of power.

1
Bomberman 1 point ago +1 / -0

But then, wouldn't deepstate be able to usher in their global version of these agencies?

1
AnnoyinglyOptimistic 1 point ago +1 / -0

…Build back better?

65
Populistdeplorable 65 points ago +66 / -1

Why is it that all executive orders made by Obama “stuck”? Any that President Trump made were either overturned or ignored. Even when Biden is overruled by the courts and made to enforce Trump’s executive orders, he ignores them. Hoping the Supreme Court rules in our favor.

64
Pederella 64 points ago +64 / -0

Because activist judges, and decades of government positions being filled by activists and activist sympathetic drones. Remember the Project Veritas videos from early Trump administration of govt workers talking about gumming up the works from the inside? Productive, positive people don't gravitate to govt jobs. There needs to be a cleaning out of upper ranks and replacing with bosses that will take a flame thrower to the lower ranks.

47
bangbus 47 points ago +47 / -0

One of my good friends used to work for CFPB. He said that in the days after Trump won there were grown men excusing themselves to go into the stairwells to cry. Support group formed. People brought “support animals” to the office. These people are children.

11
PROCIsAsshoe 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hence the reason why they go for the maximum job security and lowered expectations that come with sucking on Uncle Sam's tit! Civil service lost its dignity somewhere along the way, I don't think that our grandpas and grandmas working in the 1960s bureaucracy were ignoble and selfish like the PoS we have today.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +4 / -1

somewhere along the way

there was never dignity in paying yourself with stolen money

11
tholinz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Obama also made a lot of his senior-ranking appointees into actual civil service employees. Those fuckers are unfireable.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +2 / -1

and replacing

you didn't learn your lesson

7
AnPrim 7 points ago +7 / -0

because there is only one team

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ones Obama did either stuck (like DACA) or were just reinstated after being struck down. They're lawless

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because fighting them can cost millions of dollars to get a case to the SCOTUS, like Virginia has done here. They sued specifically for one of his "programs" that bypassed Congress. Most people negatively impacted by Obama's orders had to sue to overturn them, or like Trump, use his Presidential power to order the IRS to ignore the Obamacare tax penalty.

As much as this would be amazing and awesome to get a ruling against the agencies over, not getting a ruling will be significantly more devastating, because the three letter agencies will triple down, now that SCOTUS has ruled that their fiat power is legit. Which is why I think SCOTUS will favor Virginia. The executive branch is usurping state power and bypassing Congressional oversight and jurisdiction. Congress has been passing the buck for decades, and SCOTUS is the only power that can really change that.

It's a crucial case. Very crucial. If we win - big changes for the better. If we lose, the country sinks several thousand meters deeper into the swamp.

65
Bullet3250 65 points ago +66 / -1

This ruling will be equivalent to Herbie removing all the teeth of the Bumble!

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
9
Bullet3250 9 points ago +9 / -0

But they bounce too... :(

10
CucumberExtract 10 points ago +10 / -0

Calm down there Cornelius! Here, have some silver and gold.

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

sniff sniff lick "Nuthin'."

Fun fact - he was actually looking for peppermint - in the original telecast, he finds a peppermint candy mine near the North Pole.

-1
MasklessMarvel [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

confused

2
CucumberExtract 2 points ago +2 / -0

Both Bullet and I were referencing the old stop motion Rudolph movie.

-1
MasklessMarvel [S] -1 points ago +0 / -1

motion that stops?

sorry, i guess i am just uninformed

3
MondayCoupleIsDead 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a children's Christmas movie/show from 1964 about Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer. It used stop motion animation (look it up if you're still confused, zoomer).

The "Bumble" was the Abominable Snowman in said movie/show. Cornelius had a battle with the Bumble and hilarity ensued.... If you want an example of it watch the below clip... It's only a minute long.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V87fsP5B05k

2
OriginalPrimitive 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the laugh. damn. haha.

1
Bullet3250 1 point ago +1 / -0

We all feel like Clarice - every once in a while - trapped in the Bumbles' cave... ... even if we don't admit it.

;)

42
UpTrump 42 points ago +42 / -0

They'll just ignore the court like they're doing with abortion!

38
CentralAmericanPede 38 points ago +38 / -0

True. But at least the mask will be off.

14
Libertas_Vel_Mors 14 points ago +14 / -0

Abortion is a bad comparison, because right now, a shitload of states now ban the practice, while many blue states carry on with business as usual in that department - exactly as intended by SCOTUS' decision.

Not too many doctors in these red states are stupid enough to risk being tossed into PMITA prison over muh Roe! - instead they'll move to a blue state like WA or NY to continue plying their bloody trade.

0
Generic 0 points ago +1 / -1

I mean, I wouldn't say "a shit load of states"

8
Joaniev9 8 points ago +8 / -0

Correct

5
ptchinster 5 points ago +6 / -1

The reason being is the pentagon is a federal agency. State law doesn't trump federal. Since there is no federal abortion law anymore, they need a directive to follow on federal property.

1
Eric42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, at least it will give individuals and companies with balls, the ability to not comply with the illegitimate orders. The law will be on individuals/businesses side (if we get a judge to uphold it). But this takes courage, which unfortunately has been proven to be in low supply.

37
Microaggresor 37 points ago +38 / -1

You guys know the word confederation? If not, you are about to.

8
papa_newguineapig 8 points ago +10 / -2

Explain. We all know what confederation means, what is your implication?

28
Microaggresor 28 points ago +28 / -0

Killing the federal alphabet agencies returns power back to the states. Not so much as when under the articles of confederation. But, certainly a considerable amount more than we are under Biden or were under Barry.

Put another way, the unelected bureaucrats in DC run this country by executive fiat. Their power has been usurped from the states. Any power not given to the federal government in the constitution is a states power. There are no bureaus listed in the constitution. no EPA, ATF, FDA ETC ETC. States would have to legislate and control these things if they saw fit.

If the supremes in fact go through with this today. It with be one of the most transformational moments in our history.

15
MasklessMarvel [S] 15 points ago +17 / -2

state's rights is what the court has been reestablishing with these decisions

9
Microaggresor 9 points ago +9 / -0

I know.

33
deleted 33 points ago +34 / -1
0
FireannDireach 0 points ago +2 / -2

It does nothing to stop EOs. Just stop. It takes decision making powers from the agencies and puts it back into the hands of Congress.

Biden will still be able to issue EOs he signs that Barry writes for him, but the power of the EO to create programs and get funded automatically without Congressional legislation will be removed.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +1 / -0

You basically repeated what I'd already posted. And I didn't call you any names, so go fuck yourself.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
FireannDireach 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your chapped ass is your problem, not mine.

Weren't you supposed to be fucking yourself, anyway?

29
jnic815 29 points ago +29 / -0

Please don’t cuck out… knowing the EPA can’t touch my racecar and the ATF can’t touch my hole punchers would make this bullshit presidency slightly more bearable

8
Autist_of_Kiev 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now you just need to worry about the IRS punching holes in your race car because you’re transphobic lol

6
TheLeftIsAntiRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Heh... hole punchers.

5
aKekabove 5 points ago +5 / -0

Epa been after race cars and big trucks hard lately if you haven't noticed

3
jnic815 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh yeah I’m aware. I’ve had words with my crappy representatives staffers about the RPM act.. own a pre emissions Peterbilt and drag/street car

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

sorry but the FBI will remove your garage door pull so you can't get to your race car

29
GOPkilledTHEMSELVES 29 points ago +29 / -0

Drill baby drill

5
MasklessMarvel [S] 5 points ago +8 / -3

my wife tells me that when we have sex

2
zzRrocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lmao

24
Greenhills 24 points ago +25 / -1

The green new deal is the Ukraine aid. Sorry to burst your bubble.

20
ireallylikedogs2 20 points ago +20 / -0

blue + yellow =

I just realized this when you said it !

19
HiddenDekuScrub 19 points ago +19 / -0

Ruling or no, they'll find an excuse to keep all the moochers around.

Though a several-decade hiring freeze would fix that....

11
Sleepwoker2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sadly I tend to agree. Still, it would help all future lawsuits.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +4 / -1

DOJ already ignoring Scotus.

18
UnitedStatesofSmash 18 points ago +18 / -0

Would this end the ATF as well?

18
BeefyBelisarius 18 points ago +18 / -0

They would be reduced to enforcing the law as written, instead of issuing their own interpretations.

12
MarxhatedJews 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's been my hope.

7
bidensmissingbrain 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wouldn't end it (or any other agency) per-se, but it would potentially limit it so they can't arbitrarily do things like, say, change the definition of an SBR or redefine what a machine gun is.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

nope

they are part of the DOJ

17
CnnWillBlackmailYou 17 points ago +18 / -1

I wish.

I know that a lot of people think the Fed is the worst thing ever, but the fact is, the vast majority of our problems stem from the Department of Education indoctrinating kids from birth.

7
Shadilady 7 points ago +7 / -0

definitely had this thought many times. Eliminate DOE, and teach our kids marketable and common sense skills. Show them civics and the uniqueness and fragility of our form of government. That right there would shoot America to the moon on many levels.

17
Klown_Kutz 17 points ago +17 / -0

I have high hopes for this, based on what we've seen so far. I'm not opposed to EVs and solar. They have their place. What I'm opposed to is the way leftists think it is somehow a good idea to completely replace existing technology with something that is just not practical for everyone.

I live in Georgia. You better believe when I buy a house, it's going to have solar panels to power the A/C on hot summer days. But I also know that I'm going to have electricity from the grid for when the sun isn't out. And for where I live and work and travel, an EV would be a good fit for me. That is, if I didn't have a company vehicle and gas card provided as part of my compensation, and I was willing to pay for an EV. (I hate spending money, so not gonna happen)

That said, what I would never do, is tell my neighbor that since I do it, he has to as well, and there will be no debate.

12
tholinz 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think the issue is that you can’t just put the entire world on “renewables” by fiat. It’s going to take market forces and organic development to make the switch.

4
Klown_Kutz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. And the internal combustion engine is going to have advantages over electric for a long time to come. I'm just not going to follow the hive mind in rejecting EVs and solar outright.

2
user365927285937 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm just not going to follow the hive mind in rejecting EVs and solar outright.

The hivemind is apeshit over EVs and solar. I think you meant “by rejecting”.

1
Klown_Kutz 1 point ago +2 / -1

No I mean the hivemind on our side that outright rejects EVs based on memes.

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +2 / -1

You mean like the hundreds of photos of them spontaneously lighting on fire?

I don’t think that’s propaganda to keep us from buying EVs. I just really think they aren’t at a point yet where they practically outweigh a gas vehicle.

Solar is always good to have though. Why be dependent on the grid?

1
Klown_Kutz 1 point ago +2 / -1

As an automotive technician (L1 Master Tech) I don't go by pictures and memes for information.

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve never seen an anti-EV meme. Only countless pictures of EVs on fire, posted by real people trying to raise awareness about the obvious pitfalls of the globalists agenda.

Surely as a car mechanic you have the common sense to know that the globalists are pushing for a “green” society where they can control the power grid and keep people from driving gas powered vehicles? There is zero reason to think an anti-EV stance is the product of “hive mind” mentality and every reason to question the mainstream narrative.

1
Fidget 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S1E8SQde5rk

EV is complete bullshit and most necessary elements for the batteries come from China.

7
Autist_of_Kiev 7 points ago +7 / -0

Similar boat minus the EV. I switched all of my 2 cycle yard tools to Dewalt cordless models and almost all of my pneumatic tools as well — the thing is I did it for my own convenience. Same reason I’m putting solar panels on my garage — it suits my needs to have a building with power regardless of what is going on with the grid and in a pinch I can pull my main and back feed my house to keep the boiler and freezers going without having to fire up my generator. I drive hybrids because it’s convenient to go 5-600 miles on a tank of gas, not because I am trying to lower my “carbon footprint”.

Since I did, several of my neighbors have done likewise — most because they’re impressed by how quiet they are and because they are sick of fiddling with fuel filters and gummed up carbs.

Build compelling products and develop attractive technologies and let them compete in the free market — if they’re truly better, they’ll find adopters in the markets in which they’re practical.

4
aKekabove 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gummed up carbs are caused by the ethanol again due to government

1
Autist_of_Kiev 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s why I run E0 gasoline in my remaining equipment (all four stroke other than my big chainsaw) lol

Expensive but I need it on hand for my generator anyway

1
hospitalier 1 point ago +1 / -0

TBF most compact mowers, weedwackers and the like should really be torn down every 10-20 hours to clean them out. Most of the crap I see in carbs isn't just ethanol. 2 strokes are by nature very dirty and its not like they burn super well or have super duper air filters. It's just how it is. Luckily you can spend a saturday rebuilding all of your 2 strokes and still have time to BBQ.

Coming from a mechanic, I love my old carb'd vehicles, but there's nothing so sweet as that nice balance between. Late 80's to early 2000's of fuel injected, no complex computers, just a multimeter will do. Super reliable and doesnt require the constant tune ups.

13
armedprincess23 13 points ago +14 / -1

Opinion day tomorrow.

1
Kebobez 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS is done until October I thought?

12
sustainable_saltmine 12 points ago +12 / -0

Can we once and for all have them confirm that no Executive Order can EVER be treated like a law ever again?

no EO for vaccine mandates, no EO to protect illegals, no "oh we couldn't pass a law through Congress? Well I'll get my phone and pen out and sign an EO instead".

Forever negate the power of a President to just "sign his own orders" into law because his agenda didn't pass Congress.

A decision that puts Congress in charge would stall environmental rules intended to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy. Legislators, back in the driver’s seat, would have to debate and go public with the consequences – and costs -- of regulations that are now adopted with little buy-in from the public.

Can we please stop calling it "renewable" energy? The technology for wind and solar are wasteful, expensive (and no it doesn't 'pay for itself' eventually, solar panels for instance are only 'affordable' to most because of government incentives and subsidies), and cannot power a country as big as ours (land are and population). Can Denmark survive on wind? Sure, ok, because near the seas there's enough regular wind to keep it going. But if the wind stops, you're fucked. Same with solar. No sun, no power. Want storage batteries? they'll take up your whole basement and cost half as much as your house. If they ever fail or leak, have fun replacing them and getting rid of the bad ones. Bet your local dump won't take them. You'll have to call some EPA regulated service like for Freon at your expense and it'll be costly.

What we need are more nukes, and even better if we can ever figure out how to do fusion without needing a Sun. We can supplement in smaller applications with solar and wind, but stop thinking powering even half this country's needs is possible without maybe every square foot of open land being covered with solar panels or fields of windmills that chop up birds, and whose parts can't even be recycled when damaged and in need or replacement.

2
monkadelic 2 points ago +2 / -0

The main problem with windmills and EV's especially, is they have to function perfectly, for decades, just to break even on their carbon footprint from their creation. Most of them don't. Right now they are worse for the environment than gas cars and coal fired power plants.

1
TrannyClausSliceDice 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are they worse exactly? ELI5?

I believe you… just not educated on this topic .

3
monkadelic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Electric cars have to get up to 400k miles before they break even on the carbon utilized to built it. And they get 60% of their battery charge from coal fired electricity.

https://youtu.be/S1E8SQde5rk

If you are really curious, here's another one explaining the problem with renewables like wind and solar

https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_shellenberger_why_renewables_can_t_save_the_planet?language=en

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'll have to call some EPA regulated service

See the topic of this post...

0
MasklessMarvel [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

taking nukes from the DOE and EPA will do a lot for developing nuclear power

10
unmaskedpanda 10 points ago +10 / -0

Would also kick out the tranny bathroom rules for schools… huge.

9
cyberwar 9 points ago +9 / -0

ban the ATF!

8
pepperconchobhar 8 points ago +8 / -0

THIS. THIS is the one, guys. This could be the game changer of all game changers.

This is more massive than RvW. This would end the EPA. This would remove the fed's claws from local school systems. This is the one decision that could wound the beast and weaken it terribly.

THIS is the one that needs the most fervent prayer.

Dear Lord. PLEASE let them get this right.

3
MasklessMarvel [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

🙏 Amen

8
Coprolite 8 points ago +8 / -0

Didn't the DOJ claim the court is invalid or something.

7
BeefyBelisarius 7 points ago +7 / -0

If so, they're about to get hit with an uno reverse card.

1
Coprolite 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is the court going to enforce it's ruling? That's what the executive branch does.

7
yurimodin 7 points ago +7 / -0

PLEASE GOD

7
BlacknWhite 7 points ago +7 / -0

🙏

7
OneArmedViolinist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dear God, let this include the IRS and ATF.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

sorry and sorry

6
mcpotsmoker 6 points ago +6 / -0

Almost nothing from SCOTUS in years, not anything major like abortion or gun rights at least, and now rapid succession of major rulings in our favor? That's great, I'm happy about it, but why now? There's always something else going on we don't see yet...

4
MasklessMarvel [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

Donald J Trump is going on

2
FreedomFromGovt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. They're trying to buy us off with semi-decent rulings in hopes that we can be persuaded that Trump's "not necessary" for our nation's survival.

They don't understand that we aren't just wanting to close the Overton Window, we want to demolish the house into which it was built.

6
justified_paranoia 6 points ago +6 / -0

The line is very, very clear in this case. If they rule in favor of unelected bureaucrats there will be no legitimate argument they can use to explain themselves

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
hailXenu 6 points ago +6 / -0

ATF?

5
Sleepwoker2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Please baby please..

5
PunishedSnek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck the Deep State.

5
Visceroth 5 points ago +5 / -0

Opinions tomorrow at 10am. Hopefully a hump day for the ages.

5
dr_gonzo 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know people are stoked about Roe but THIS will have much more far reaching implications. This will be the biggest win for freedom loving Americans in 100 years. Its importance and significance cannot be overstated.

I'm like a kid waiting on Christmas. PLEASE LET THIS HAPPEN.

5
Blyatcat4 5 points ago +6 / -1

Are they also able to end affirmative action?

Also, I've been saying, pay attention to the shifts happening right now. You owe it to yourself because these are exciting times and the energy people have put into sharing their truth and shinging their light on darkness is paying off.

All the hard work people put into this is making a difference. Even if this doesn't go through, just the idea that it's a possibility at this time in exciting. Don't do yourself a disservice and tune out now. There's a lot more on the horizon.

4
databasedcentral 4 points ago +4 / -0

Students for fair admission vs Harvard case will be taken up by Supreme Court either later this year or next, that has potential to kill affirmative action.

5
CovfefeVideo 5 points ago +5 / -0

DHS FBI ATF CDC FDA BLM IRS... could get interesting

3
dec3169 3 points ago +3 / -0

CIA, although it would likely go to DOD like the NSA. DHS and ATF could also go to the DOD. Maybe even FBI. Just repeal posse comitatus, and put those responsibilities on the National Guard. That way it would be State run unless the President calls the guard up to quell a rebellion. No more calling them up to supplement Active Duty (other than the 2 weeks a year of active duty).

Each service department already has their version of Federal Agents - NCIS, CID, OSI, and they are generally a good and competent bunch of agents. I worked with all of those agencies (plus other non-mil agencies) when I was doing computer security work at the Pentagon years ago. Those agencies weren't compromised by politics because they were subject to the UCMJ - not the DOJ.

1
hospitalier 1 point ago +1 / -0

posse comitatus

In it's original form, it's most closely what I expect a proper government to do.

BLM Riots? Round up the locals and protect the town.

http://www.mincedgarlic.org/on-rittenhouse.html

5
Axios87 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy cow!

4
xkgb 4 points ago +4 / -0

Could this end all federal TLAs (Three Letter Agencies)?

10
jnic815 10 points ago +10 / -0

The way I understand it, they won’t end, but it takes their teeth. Their policing powers will be gone, they won’t be able to make laws and enforce them.

The premise being that lawmaking is for legislatures and not bureaucrats

3
Sleepwoker2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make. They won't be able to "make". They can still enforce, which is fine, but they can't make decisions anymore.

4
RumDrummer 4 points ago +4 / -0

ATF ATF ATF!

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

sorry they are DOJ

2
RumDrummer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ugh. They're doing the same shit though, could this would castrate their overreach?

4
Littleirishmaid 4 points ago +4 / -0

DOE?

0
MasklessMarvel [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

department of deer

i mean, energy

1
Littleirishmaid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, I meant department of education.

4
Dirk_Nager 4 points ago +4 / -0

Make it happen My Captain!

Capn Long Dong Thomas!

4
Trunks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let's hope ... Though I would rather have them get rid of the stupidence agencies.

3
TrumpVoter1 3 points ago +3 / -0

one step at a time. this cuts them off at the knees. next would be the justification of why they even still need to exist if congress has to take over

2
papa_newguineapig 2 points ago +2 / -0

This guy fucks politics.

-1
MasklessMarvel [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

that's the hidden beauty here

these agencies were created to take the burden off of congress

having to vote on every regulation would mean that congress would have to work

or just throw them in a slush pile

win win

1
TrumpVoter1 1 point ago +1 / -0

agreed and that is why this outcome, if it goes as hoped for, is such a big deal for all americans.

4
throwawayStudent 4 points ago +14 / -10

The DOE shouldn't be eliminated. They do a TON of fundamental research on geology, fusion, nuclear, quantum, etc.

18
top_eagle 18 points ago +23 / -5

Someone else can.

2
throwawayStudent 2 points ago +6 / -4

Easier said than done LOL

12
bangbus 12 points ago +12 / -0

Agreed. There are legitimate agencies but for every legitimate agency or function there are ten that exist solely for subversion and are funding shit like “disparate impact of detention on inner city youth.”

1
top_eagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Out of context, but reminds me of a Jesus quote: “what is easier to say, ‘you are saved from your sins’, or to say, ‘rise and walk again.” If I misquoted, apologies.

2
bubadmt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kamala Harris to be new energy czar, with the suction ability to power all of the power plants and windmills simultaneously.

10
yurimodin 10 points ago +10 / -0

yes it should......their is no good damn reason our newest nuclear plant was built before I was born. All this muh electric shit but no nuclear power is a damn disaster.

9
Klown_Kutz 9 points ago +10 / -1

Let Elon Musk take that research over. We'll be living in Star Trek in 10 years.

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

A member of the WEF and supporter of transhumanism, NWO, the clotshot? Are you insane?

6
FLYWHEEL_PRIME 6 points ago +6 / -0

The problem is the fundamental way we administer our politics.

There is nothing wrong with having specialist agencies that do research and make policy, HOWEVER, every single piece of that needs to go through the legislative branch and be voted on. These stupid, lazy mother fuckers in Congress can't wipe their own ass it seems, so I don't expect them to understand nuances of quantum physics.

3
Philhelm 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haven't you learned anything about government?

4
PresJackson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Eliminating the ability of the executive to legislate through regulation would be the biggest and most impactful decision since Marbury v. Madison

4
pogowasright 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a force multiplier and devolution of illegitimate power enhancer...Red states patriots and like minded citizens join together and take advantage, pass laws to ban and drive out the traitorous globalists in your towns, cities, communities

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

They won't do it. Roberts will side with libs and kavanaugh will try to tend his legacy.

3
lsvogel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder how many of these bloated Fed Gov't dept and agency employees will be given a pink slip?

FROM GOOGLE;

DOE = approximately 14,000 federal employees Overview. The Department of Energy (DOE) enterprise is comprised of approximately 14,000 federal employees and over 95,000 management and operating contractor and other contractor employees at the Department's headquarters in Washington, D.C. and 83 field locations.

FCC = 1,482 federal employees The FCC is funded entirely by regulatory fees. It has an estimated fiscal-2022 budget of US $388 million. It has 1,482 federal employees as of July 2020.

EPA = 15,000 People also ask How many staff does EPA have? We are 15,000+ individuals from diverse backgrounds in a full range of career fields and positions…Feb 22, 2022

3
Schroeder09 3 points ago +3 / -0

The EPA is China's business sourcing arm. The EPA kills business here and makes doing business impossible so that it is sent to China. It is a horribly corrupt and stupid entity. No one here will argue that the FDA and CDC also need abolished due to what we've seen the last 2 years. No one here will argue that the CIA and FBI need abolished. SEC, FCC, IRS, all of 'em. Anything FDR started needs torn down. Then after the administrative state is gone ELLIMINATE THE FED! If anyone attempts to get rid of the fed assassinations will start, but it's a struggle worth undergoing for freedom.

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

businesses should not be allowed to go to Chyna

taxation is theft

bring back a strong tariff trade policy

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

If anyone attempts to get rid of the fed assassinations will start

These demons asssassinate for breathing the wrong way.

If anything passes that appears to take power away from the government, it will be deliberate and intentional. For what ends exactly will remain to be seen but I think it’s for a full scale civil war.

1
MasklessMarvel [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

i would say the investigative and enforcement personnel

unless they retire them in place

less people = smaller budget

3
Leucophylla12 3 points ago +3 / -0

Full fucking mast

3
ubermk3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just in time to kick off the leftist summer of rage. Let's see if they bring the same energy they did in the 2020 summer of love and mostly peaceful protests.

3
aangler100 3 points ago +3 / -0

The good news for us is that the Communists/RINOs/Democrats cannot don't seem to understand that these S.C. rulings go far beyond the individual cases where they are decided.

3
Truglow 3 points ago +4 / -1

GE has been sucking the PowerTaxCredit for yesrs. I grew so uncomfortable working there I left. Screw all of these agencies that payroll activites that are bankrolled on our backs. I didnt vote for any of these criminals. Defund them all.

3
GlobalismIsTrash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully no more CDC.