Comments (40)
sorted by:
GrotthussMechanism 49 points ago +49 / -0

There’s a difference between “derived from the cells of aborted children” and “developed using cell lines derived from aborted children.”

Notice how they make the headline, technically, factually inaccurate, while it appears Justice Thomas was careful and correct in his wording.

Mungo 31 points ago +31 / -0

As he always is.

canada_is_communist 14 points ago +14 / -0

You think liberals would do that?

Lie to push an agenda?

No way!

thelawmat 2 points ago +2 / -0

#TrustCNN 🤓

resoluteAction 1 point ago +1 / -0

That and they are lying. The COVID genetic therapies used aborted stem cells both in the testing of the product and also in its manufacture.

LesboPregnancyScare 27 points ago +27 / -0

what do you mean suggests, its known the development, testing and final product of all available vaccines include stem cell lines from aborted babies

Liberty_Prime 17 points ago +18 / -1

Wait. So the print under the headline confirms the claim in the headline?

LoobintheToobin 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s normal so it’s okay- politico

resoluteAction 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are trying to say religious objections are bogus because all recent vaccines, not just the experimental gene therapy use stem cells from aborted fetuses for testing by manufacturers.

  1. the public didn't know this
  2. only the experimental gene therapy was developed using aborted stem cells
  3. only the experimental gene therapy is produced from aborted stem cells
PrezElectHamsandwich 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, it's the opposite. It shows that he was quoting someone else, and Politico chose to write a headline implying those were his words.

Bob_Wahr 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thomas is merely saying what the litigants are claiming. That is an indisputable statement of fact, and the Politico headline is deliberately misleading.

HalfBreedSupremacist 12 points ago +12 / -0

All sides agree with Thomas's description. One side just disagrees with the implications.

remindmelater 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's not all about the cells from aborted babies....although that is a big component to objecting to the death vax....they have openly admitted that it changes your RNA....and probably your DNA and it is still experimental.....They have bragged that it will control the worlds population through this means. From a Christian perspective our fundamental theology warns us about the seed of Satan and the genetic manipulations before the flood.

LoobintheToobin 4 points ago +5 / -1

The covid vax-sin is a satanic sacrifice, an affront to God, a denial of God’s healing power, ignorance to God’s guiding hand, a rejection of God via an idolatry of fear and a child sacrifice to baal. It is also a biological weapon designed to kill and control, change and corrupt what was made in the image of God. All around bad news.

July 21 2021: “Archbishop Viganò: Vaccines made with fetal tissue are a ‘human sacrifice of innocent victims offered to Satan’ Bishop: https://archive.vn/IenxF (link stoned. Alts: https://www.catholicity.com/vigano/2021-07-21.html) Viganò sees that “abortion is proposed by the Satanists as a true and proper religious rite,” arguing that in this Satanic world view, through an abortion-tainted vaccine, one becomes a member of the Satanic anti-church. He writes that Satan claims, “through the pharmaceutical companies that use fetal tissue from abortions to manufacture a so-called vaccine that is presented in the delirium of Covid-19 as a sacrament of salvation by which one is incorporated into the ‘mystical body’ of Satan, the globalist anti-church.” “Mors Tua Vita Mea (Your death is my life) is the title of the Italian book on the abortion-tainted coronavirus vaccines ””The ancient pagan rituals – omnes dii gentium demonia, says the Psalm – live again today in the sacrificial offering that unfortunate mothers believe can be claimed as a right.”

youknowthething76 8 points ago +10 / -2

Ban the vaccines

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
cantrememberpassword 6 points ago +7 / -1

Last I heard it was the prototype using a zygote from a frozen embryo in the 80s. Seriously. There was an article debunking that everyone's vaccine did it, by saying, no, only the prototype used it. Someone can fact check me here.

LoobintheToobin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fetal cell lines used https://archive.vn/PAM5t They try to differentiate between a fetal cell line and fetal “tissue.” Watch for villainous semantics. “No, the COVID-19 vaccines do not contain any aborted fetal cells. However, Pfizer and Moderna did perform confirmation tests (to ensure the vaccines work) using fetal cell lines. And Johnson & Johnson uses fetal cell lines in vaccine development, confirmation and production.”

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells “The … manufacture of vaccines using such ethically-tainted human cell lines demonstrates profound disrespect for the dignity of the human person.”

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and 20 other religious, medical, and political organizations that oppose abortion wrote to Stephen Hahn, commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in April: https://www.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/Letter-to-FDA-urging-ethical-COVID-vaccines.April%2017%202020.pdf

“the human fetal cells are used as miniature “factories” to generate vast quantities of adenoviruses” “used as vehicles to ferry genes”

Edward jenner used children to transport viruses also: “In 1803, the ship sailed for South America. On board were 22 orphans to act as vaccine carriers. “There is no way of mass-producing vaccine, so they give it to a child,” explains Najera. “The child will develop the lesion, then they take it from their child a couple of days later, give it to the next child and so on and so forth down the line.”



https://www.ncregister.com/commentaries/how-to-object-to-an-abortion-tainted-covid-19-vaccine Archive: https://archive.vn/i5qV0 “Abstain. The Pontifical Academy for Life says it is “right to abstain” if refusal to use the vaccine can be done without causing harm to yourself or community. If you judge that you can go without the vaccine, you should do so, even if it means continuing to adopt social-distancing measures to keep those around you safe. This honors the safety of others while respecting the dignity of unborn human life. By making this choice, you are showing that you are willing to sacrifice personal comfort to reject a vaccine produced using the remains of an aborted child.”

MRC-5 and WI-38 Names of aborted fetal lines HEK-293, a kidney cell line widely used in research and industry that comes from a fetus aborted in about 1972; and PER.C6, a proprietary cell line owned by Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, developed from retinal cells from an 18-week-old fetus aborted in 1985 https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells The Tortured Travesty immortalized in perpetual slavery. Black mirror level confinement. Free the sacrificed children in perpetual cellular slavery!

StrangerThanFiction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the great info but this link doesn't work:

U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and 20 other religious, medical, and political organizations that oppose abortion wrote to Stephen Hahn, commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in April: https://www.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/Letter-to-FDA-urging-ethical-COVID-vaccines.April%2017%202020.pdf

Checked archive.is too but no luck

hiddensfinger 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I read once, because it was unlawful to use new murdered fetuses for the bio cell for vaccines. Idk what these fuckers are doing now.

koyima 0 points ago +1 / -1

you really think they have been buying aborted babies because they are able to infinitely reproduce those initial cell lines?

I doubt it

I doubt that everyone has access. I doubt that all research happens on those 2 cell lines

They came out when Trump put a stop to a lot of it and cried that research will stop

What research? Why do you need fresh babies if you are using the same cell line from 50 years ago?


These are just stories they tell you so you can say: oh, it's just an over-reaction, of course they aren't slaughtering millions for the all mighty dollar

TheNightJanitor 6 points ago +6 / -0

I mean, he is correct.

jctbg20 5 points ago +5 / -0

No matter how many times the "fetal cell lines" have been "replicated", the origin stays the same

quantumconfusion 3 points ago +3 / -0

I state this fact on a Christian subreddit and got banned for it!

Perhelion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Politico: “But the aborted baby cells are in all vaccines, so it’s justified because it’s not a new practice.”

God’s gonna cook a lot of asses in the Lake of Fire. Not because he wanted them there, but because they chose to be there.

I just saw that the Brandon administration is buying another 105 million dollars in vaccines for the upcoming flu season. I guess they needed to launder more money BEFORE the midterms and before the lack of baby parts creates a vaccine shortage.

suckmycorona 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about all the other shit that’s in the vaccines.

BoughtByBloomberg2 3 points ago +3 / -0

THEY ARE!!!! THEY ADMIT IT IN THE REPORTS FOR APPROVAL!!!! No matter of redefinition changes reality.

gthog61 3 points ago +3 / -0

sounds like he is correct

Zelenskyscockholster 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's no suggesting. It's true.

TheFountainhead 3 points ago +3 / -0

This man must have the protection of the Lord because I imagine the deep state hates him more than trump.

MAGAinControl 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how I got my religious exemption at work! With docs downloaded from a post here at PdW

Sdelira 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Kraken has awakened.

MetalRiddle 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. They even have to admit he is 100% correct.

PhantomShield72 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at the way the headline and subhead are structured.

The headline is like "Pfft... Fuckin' Clarence Thomas thinks Covid vaccines are made using aborted children, what an idiot..."

Then, the subhead is like "So anyway, using Aborted baby cells to develop vaccines is common practice..."

Benwa1985-2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just when you think you can't like the guy anymore.

IAmNotAnAutist 1 point ago +1 / -0

any more

me-no-likely3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another inaccurate and misleading headline from the fake news industrial complex

TommyJarvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

All mRNA vaccines were developed using the human kidney cells that came from an aborted baby. That’s true, and has been admitted to for some time. They attempted to obscure this info but anyone could find it, and Project Vureetus even got docs with them talking about not wanting to publicize that fact.

The J&J shot was developed AND manufactured using human retinal cells that came from an aborted baby, this also is something they made clear long ago.

Fact is there is not a COVID shot on the market that didn’t use cells from aborted babies in the process.

And there is not GOING to be, either.

CMDRConanAAnderson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only did the lady reveal that this was the case in that letter about being concerned people finding out, but she also wanted to keep knowledge a secret. On top of this, wasn't there a literal receipt from the CDC/WHO buying aborted fetal parts for vaccine research? The purpose might have been something else, but it was definitely within the WuFlu realm.

BigguthDickuth 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not a Q guy by any means but I have to admit it seems there is something percolating behind the scenes.

EuphoricTrillby -2 points ago +1 / -3

SCOTUS reaffirmed the healthcare vax mandate again? Wtf

RedneckWhiteandBlue [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

i don't think so

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0