1875
Comments (171)
sorted by:
109
BigIronBigIron 109 points ago +115 / -6

No, but they challenged the bankers, and it got them killed

27
Thelongrun 27 points ago +31 / -4

Massive upvote deserved for this truth.💯

17
Trumpwon306 17 points ago +22 / -5

Don't forget that the Confederates had the first Jewish person in a Presidential cabinet!

<3

2
Flipakademsarepedos 2 points ago +5 / -3

Wow!!!!!!! I’ve never heard that!!!!! Thanks pede. Helps destroy the whole racist narrative of them by the Yankees

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +3 / -3

Guess who first perpetrated that claim? Rhymes with Dation of Dislam.

1
getkek 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sounds like something they would say hah.

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

YAKUB DUN MAED DEM YTS SINTHETIKALY

1
FutureFreemason 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's not a good thing...

15
Taste_the_red_pill_ 15 points ago +16 / -1

Lincoln messed up and switched his VP running mate for second term to Andrew Johnson (Dem) to try to unify the USA. General Sherman was in talks with the freed slaves in which they were to receive quite a bit of Georgia coastline land that had been previously owned by plantations. Andrew Johnson was a sympathizer to the white plantation owners. There were three assassins that night. One for Lincoln one for Johnson and one for Seward. Lincoln and Seward was attacked. Azterodt which was Johnson’s assassin got drunk and never left his hotel room.

4
MeinDonald 4 points ago +12 / -8

This is antisemitic. Please delete

11
deleted 11 points ago +16 / -5
3
Vlad_The_Impaler 3 points ago +10 / -7

Has Trump ever challenged the bankers?

I know he argued for interest rates to remain low.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
8
NC_patriot 8 points ago +8 / -0

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/14/hunter-biden-was-paid-consultant-at-age-21-to-large-credit-card-co-while-dad-helped-credit-card-industry-with-legislation-839084/

Hunter Biden was paid consultant at age 21 to large credit card co. while dad helped credit card industry with legislation

6
redditadminssuckit [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

No doubt. Usary 19-30% interest rates all made possible in Jersey.

Try a credit union. 8-11% and no bullshit fees

4
YouKnowWhatItIs87 4 points ago +4 / -0

Going to college in 2006, I didn’t know Biden was the one responsible for making student loan debt non-bankruptable. Just assumed it had been that way for many decades. And leftist hipsters were all excited when Biden went in thinking he’d forgive their student loans.

3
Flipakademsarepedos 3 points ago +3 / -0

Evil fuck!!!! Every time I see Biden I get so angry it’s nausciating!!!!!!

2
LadyPedette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden nauseates me as well.

4
Bigger_igloo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not in any meaningful way, but to be fair, if he did they likely would have just killed him and he wouldnt have gotten anything else done. I feel like he tried to work with them to a degree, to change the system from within. But, we all know that's not really possible. Only way would be to take action most people wouldnt like and probably wouldnt hold up in court, but if you did it Corleone style all at the same time... (not necessarily saying to "whack" everyone, but arresting the top couple levels would make for interesting chaos and snitching).

4
deleted 4 points ago +15 / -11
4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
2
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah ignore the huge gains small businesses made and the 5000 a year median income increase and energy independence...that was good for EVERYONE.

2
Crimalizeislam 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth

3
resoluteAction 3 points ago +3 / -0

By demanding an end to voter fraud you better believe he challenged the bankers. No one voted for a federal reserve.

1
HowWeGotHere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, he forced the federal reserve to buy back ALL of their debt. And they did. When Biden came in, they transitioned that debt into housing.

2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Challenged the bankers"

You mean, at least in Lincoln's case, simped for railroad executives?

41
publius1788 41 points ago +41 / -0

Lincoln actually had opposing politicians arrested without habeus corpus.

23
redditadminssuckit [S] 23 points ago +25 / -2

and STILL he was better than Biden

15
publius1788 15 points ago +16 / -1

I do have to agree with that. At least Lincoln was intelligent and a very articulate speaker.

10
DrCowboyPresident 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, the body count though

9
publius1788 9 points ago +9 / -0

You are also right, almost 1 million Americans dying is really horrible, especially with an 1860s population. But Biden isn't finished yet so just wait and see which one is worse!

13
MeinDonald 13 points ago +14 / -1

Honestly Trump should've done the same thing. So many US politicians are in bed with the bankers and defense contractors. Most of them should be millstoned

10
publius1788 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yeah I agree with that. The problem is he would have no one in the Federal government who would carry out his orders. And Lincoln wasn't doing it to corrupt politicians. He did it to politicians in border states like Maryland and Missouri that may have supported secession.

-4
FarmerHuck -4 points ago +4 / -8

Every person who fought under the Confederate Flag was a Democrat pal. Stop trying to romanticize the Confederacy. The Civil war was a war between Republicans and Democrats. You know, the Democrats who didn't want to give up slavery. If you are carrying water for those scumbags, you're nothing but a glowy Democrat yourself, you fucking dipshit.

8
publius1788 8 points ago +10 / -2

I just believe the states have the right to secede.

0
SaddleTramp 0 points ago +2 / -2

They effectively dont.

4
publius1788 4 points ago +4 / -0

They should though.

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

They do.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd say the continual existence of West Virginia kinda proves that they do, at least to some extent.

4
Major_Nutt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine being so stupid as to see the Civil War as nothing but Repubs vs Dems.

There were a host of reasons for the war, the biggest of which was Federal overreach into the sovereignty of the States.

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +2 / -2

Do you have evidence of that?

Isn't it funny how four slave states fought for the Union or had pro-Union governments (Missouri, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky)?

The War Between the States wasn't "between Republicans and Democrats", it was all for tax revenue.

2
peltast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you give any books or such that can expand on this? I KNOW the War of Northern Aggression wasn't about slavery, but, I haven't read enough on the tax revenue aspect.

Thanks.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +2 / -1

"Fateful Lightning" by Allen C. Guelzo. To avoid confusion, there is a book called "The Fateful Lightning" by Jeff Shaara that also talks about the war, I haven't read that one.

You can also simply read each states' declaration of secession. Georgia's is particularly detailed.

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you very much!

0
RoyalPython23 0 points ago +1 / -1

Those who claim the tariff was the main cause of the civil war fail to mention that northern ports overwhelmingly paid more than any southern port. Since they love to claim it was taxation, my question is, why didn’t the northern states rebel instead of the southern states? The answer is that taxation was a minor issue. Southerns were afraid of losing power. Their popular was overwhelmingly smaller than the north’s and with the election of Lincoln they realized that if they were going to hold onto power they had breakaway from the USA. Their next plan, if they had won the civil war, was to invade Latin America. The short term goals of the Confederate empire would have been to either buy or conquer Cuba and Mexico. Ultimately, the Confederate States of America were evil and thank God the North won the war. All those on here who love the CSA are filthy losers and are just as bad as the communists who currently control our nation today.

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sources, please?

0
ragnarokrobo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why is it several northern states didn't hive up their slaves for the entire duration of the war? Strange how Republicans did the same thing as democrats.

3
PunishedSnek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Biden's handlers could do the same.

6
Vlad_The_Impaler 6 points ago +7 / -1

Already did. Jan 6 prisoners

32
BarronVonSaltzburg26 32 points ago +32 / -0

Biden is not an institutionalist he is a criminal, who knows his crimes are coming to light and wants to therefore destroy anyone and anything that can stop his criminal enterprise. He has the mind of a child and this is exactly how a child behaves.

20
Vlad_The_Impaler 20 points ago +22 / -2

Joe Biden is a puppet and is not the one in power.

They give him cue cards when to stand up, when to sit, and which fraud journalists to call on for scripted questions and how to answer.

1
Bigger_igloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The most inept puppet leader in history. Makes for a good puppet tho, crooked and incapable of his own thoughts.

22
Gans 22 points ago +25 / -3

Lincoln built a federalized army to wage bloody war against his own country. Not a great guy.

-1
MakeCaliforniaRED -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well if half of your country declares independence of course you are going to use every bit of your power to reconquer it.

-11
redditadminssuckit [S] -11 points ago +7 / -18

Say you're a southerner without saying you're a southerner.

17
Gans 17 points ago +19 / -2

I'm not even a Southerner 😂 just being historically accurate. It would essentially be no different than if Joe Biden used military force to impose Roe v Wade on the states.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
Julius_Severus2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yankee by birth Rebel by choice

2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +4 / -2

Lincoln declared war over lost tax revenue. Literally zero reason to go to war over secession.

2
redditadminssuckit [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

SOURCE PLEASE

3
Yawnz13 3 points ago +4 / -1

https://mises.org/library/lincolns-tariff-war

Nevermind the utter absence of any legislation delaring secession illegal at the time, so no crime was being committed and thus Lincoln had no legitimate grounds to declare war on that account.

Add in that there were four slaves states that were pro-Union (Missouri, Maryland, Kentucky, Delaware) and that the Emancipation Proclamation not freeing slaves in any Union-held territory, and the idea that it was "a war to free the slaves" ends up as nothing more than more public school propaganda.

3
XlDEN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Interestingly the Emancipation Proclamation not only did not free slaves in the northern slave states, but it also stated that any state that seceded could KEEP their slaves if they returned to the Union by Jan. 1, 1863.

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not just northern slave states, but ANY Union-held territory at the time of writing. That meant large parts of Virginia and Tennessee.

-2
MakeCaliforniaRED -2 points ago +1 / -3

So much southern sympathizers here. It almost feels like I’m a pro confederate forum here. I have no problem with pro confederates but I don’t understand why people here in the west wave confederate flags but if someone can tell me why then it would be helpful.

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Watch the Dukes of Hazzard. It wasn't about slavery, either.

18
Vlad_The_Impaler 18 points ago +30 / -12

JFK was a philandering womanizer and privileged brat from a moonshiner family that got rich off prohibition.

Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant who would not allow states to voluntarily leave a corrupt union. If you are FORCED to stay inside the union, it is not a Republic, it is an empire.

14
redditadminssuckit [S] 14 points ago +15 / -1

And STILL they were both better than Biden, AND actually elected.

1
MeinDonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

even tho you keep reposting this, I still think it's funny

5
Meddlesom 5 points ago +7 / -2

JFK also directly caused the cuban missile crisis, put Cuba in the arms of the Soviets with his Bay of Pigs disaster, escalated the war in Vietnam by having the South Vietnamese anti-communist president assassinated, put the Baath party in power in Iraq (Saddam Hussein).

People say he took on the CIA, but he sure did their bidding every time it mattered.

JFK was one of the worst presidents we've ever had. Whoever blew his brains out did us a favor.

2
publius1788 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah just cemented his legacy as a great president while we got the even worse LBJ.

4
Meddlesom 4 points ago +5 / -1

The only reason he is looked on as a great president is because he was assassinated.

2
SaddleTramp 2 points ago +3 / -1

Moon landing probably helped a bit

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +2 / -1

Given that Cuba was already Communist by the time of the Bay of Pigs, pretty sure they were going to ally themselves with the USSR regardless.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

The combination of the Bay of Pigs and putting short range Jupiter missiles (offensive, first-strike nuclear missiles) in Turkey, pointed at Moscow, is what prompted, and allowed, the Soviets to put nukes in Cuba. Two countries defending themselves against the US, because we were the ones attacking them and threatening them. That's JFK.

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

Right, but let's not act like Cuba wasn't going to align itself more with other Communist nations post-revolution regardless.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's not act like we didn't attack them and give them a reason to need nukes put on their island to protect them from us.

0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah yes, we just "attacked" them. Out of the blue, no reason at all. I mean, it isn't like it was support for a counter-revolutionary group who was trying to take their country back from Castro's Communists or anything, right? It also wasn't like Castro didn't nationalize American businesses that were already present in Cuba, thus committing theft, right?

The Cuban Revolution was exactly what got the USSR interested in Cuba in the first place and the alliance wass already present prior to JFK even entering office. They already saw Cuba as the lynchpin of the spread of Communism in Latin America and were willing to supply arms and military defense regardless of the nukes. They were already supplying Cuba with SA-2 SAMs, tanks, and all manner of small arms.

The Cuban Missile Crisis, wasn't about Jupiter missiles in Turkey and Italy, it was about the fact that the Soviets had no practical way to reach targets in the US at the time (having only 4 total known ICBMs in 1961), and would've put missiles in Cuba regardless because Khruschev thought Kennedy was weak based on the results of the Bay of Pigs and the 1961 Berlin Wall Crisis.

  1. Khruschev knew the Soviets could not match the US in terms of ICBM numbers.

  2. Khruschev saw Kennedy as weak and thought he would permit missiles in Cuba.

  3. Khruschev then planned on using Cuban missiles as leverage to pull West Berlin entirely under Soviet control because he saw it as a vulnerability to the USSR.

5
JoePedoCheated 5 points ago +6 / -1

Salient points. Don't know how these truths could be disagreed with. They ARE truths, after all.

But Trump also had some negatives, or flaws. No human is perfect, save for Jesus.

Just got to hope for more good than bad.

4
skywalk 4 points ago +6 / -2

Hard to understand the down votes other than the truth hurts.

18
deleted 18 points ago +19 / -1
10
redditadminssuckit [S] 10 points ago +13 / -3

Stop spoiling my fun

5
RoyalPython23 5 points ago +5 / -0

No Taney was not arrested. Lincoln might have talked about arresting Taney but it never happened.

4
fat50 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bust out the source, brah.

13
BarneyFranksNipples 13 points ago +13 / -0

“We didn’t get our way, so we need to destroy the system and anyone on the other side” - Democrats

“Why is there so much political divide?” - Democrats

11
DJTXLV 11 points ago +12 / -1

There is no RIGHT to an abortion. Fuck these lying media hacks.

There IS a right to life. That’s more important than a whore who couldn’t keep her legs closed. Libs, shut the fuck up about rape. Those are small amounts of cases. If we allow them, will you shut up about the rest of abortions? No? Then fuck off completely.

-1
InTrumpWeTrust3 -1 points ago +4 / -5

I gotta disagree, there's some cases in which it makes sense. In Ohio yesterday a 10 year old rape victim was denied the chance to have an abortion.... in cases like that where it's extreme, I think we shouldn't force the victim to have the baby, especially if they are 10. We have to be careful to not step into that groomer territory.

6
SafetyGuy 6 points ago +6 / -0

More importantly when do we turn that rapist into a eunuch and toss him off the 50th floor to make an example in that case.

0
Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points ago +2 / -2

This.

I think the solution to InTrumpWeTrust3 's concern is to increase penalties for rape.

2
1
yunarukami 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was her life even in danger?

-1
InTrumpWeTrust3 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ohio politicians are working to close that loop hole though, in this sense the 10 year old was lucky, a year from now that probably won't be the case though.

0
Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points ago +1 / -1

Has anyone been arrested for impregnating a 10 year old girl?

Or was it a young boy who did it?

3
NC_patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't find who committed the rape.

1
Fine_Kentucky_Jenkum 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one will be arrested. To do so would be to admit that Central American culture consists of backward, murdering, child-raping traditions.

1
Donger-Lord2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t care.

1
WashingtonIsNext 1 point ago +2 / -1

Still a human life tbh.

2
InTrumpWeTrust3 2 points ago +4 / -2

There's cases where it's just too extreme though. No 10 year old should ever have to give birth to a baby if they don't want to, just my opinion but this seems barbaric.

1
Vlad_The_Impaler 1 point ago +2 / -1

Check out the story of Kathy Barnette, the woman who SHOULD have been elected over Oz.

1
DJTXLV 1 point ago +1 / -0

See, now on initial gut reaction I’d agree with you. What a horrible situation to put a 10 year old through. I get it. I have a young daughter.

But I immediately then think of the innocent life that was created. Another wrong doesn’t make a right. Although, in that case, I know in my heart the Lord would understand and would not hold that decision against anyone. He is compassionate.

In any case, this though all proves my point. THESE are the cases that should have only ever come up with abortion. These rare, few and far between special cases. Not the fucking whores who get their card punched each time and gets her 10 killing free.

10
Glowing_Handshake 10 points ago +14 / -4

Lincoln was a piece of shit, too

-4
redditadminssuckit [S] -4 points ago +5 / -9

Username checks out

7
Glowing_Handshake 7 points ago +8 / -1

do you know how the intelligence community operates?

6
sustainable_saltmine 6 points ago +6 / -0

Biden needs to be smacked down a million times. This asshole is out of control.

6
Meddlesom 6 points ago +6 / -0

No civilization, no species, that is THIS into killing its own offspring, deserves to survive.

6
Pepper2 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Federal government lashes out at court designed to limit their power"

4
Correndo 4 points ago +7 / -3

Good time to remind everyone that like Biden, JFK was a fraud.

Edit: Downvoters need to learn some real history. JFK was a fraud whole won via voter fraud.

4
Ayahuasca_One 4 points ago +5 / -1

The hand that controls the puppet is the real head

-1
ProtestantPatriot -1 points ago +3 / -4

The papacy?

3
Julius_Severus2 3 points ago +6 / -3

Did you know that 7/8 of the democratic party's biggest financers are Catholics even though Catholics are only 1/4 of the American population?

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/most-influential-democratic-donors-2020-elections.html

Oh whoops, my mistake. 7/8 of the democratic party's biggest financers are Jews even though Jews are only 1/50 of the American population

-3
ProtestantPatriot -3 points ago +2 / -5

“We have no king but Ceasar” - Joos

Who again is ceasar you low testosterone galaxy brain fag?

3
Julius_Severus2 3 points ago +4 / -1

At the time when Jewish priests demanded the execution of Christ the Caesar was Tiberius

The Romans didn’t particularly care about Jesus, Pontius Pilate, demonstrating behavior common in bureaucrats to this day, did everything in his power to avoid responsibility for taking controversial action, including offering a lesser punishment than death and attempting to dump the whole mess off on Herod.

I don’t think anyone is buying your attempt to pretend to be Christian bro. It’s pretty obvious where your loyalties lie.

-2
ProtestantPatriot -2 points ago +1 / -3

So tell me, why did your joo boogey men not accept Jesus and want him killed? Chapter and verse please

0
Julius_Severus2 0 points ago +2 / -2

You're not familiar with Christ's trial before the Sanhedrin? If you're going to impersonate a Christian on the internet you should at least read the Gospels.

There are countless verses about the Passion. It's kind of an important part of the Christian religion.

John explicitly describes the Jews motivation for killing Christ:

10 The Jews therefore said unto him that was cured, It is the sabbath day: it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed.

11 He answered them, He that made me whole, the same said unto me, Take up thy bed, and walk.

12 Then asked they him, What man is that which said unto thee, Take up thy bed, and walk?

13 And he that was healed wist not who it was: for Jesus had conveyed himself away, a multitude being in that place.

14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.

15 The man departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus, which had made him whole.

16 And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.

17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.

18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+5%3A10-5%3A18&version=KJV

Paul also speaks to their motivation

14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Thessalonians+2%3A14+-+2%3A16&version=KJV

-1
ProtestantPatriot -1 points ago +1 / -2

This is EXACTLY what I just said, BOT confirmed

-2
ProtestantPatriot -2 points ago +2 / -4

And my loyalties lie with the truth, you low energy faggot

1
Julius_Severus2 1 point ago +2 / -1

You know that’s not true

-1
ProtestantPatriot -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ill fast forward for you. The joos who you’ve been propagandized to hate because of centuries of ROMAN PROPAGANDA, are actually the tribes of Judah and Benjamin who were in Jerusalem at the time, YHWH HAD TO PURPOSEFULLY BLIND them SO THAT they would petition the Roman to have him killed, thus fulfilling the scriptures and providing atonement for the ELECT. Now your dumb ass is so theologically illiterate you celebrate Christmas and Easter and hate Jews, all the whole being totally ignorant of everything, just another victim of theological propaganda from the Jesuits, a foe you’re too dumb to see. So sit back little guy, let the real men tell the rest what’s going on, so we can get back to where we were when we first separated from the Roman Catholic Church and created this free nation. Abraham Lincoln from his own mouth says that Americas enemy was the Jesuits, yet here you are in 2022 saying it’s the big bag boogey men joos. Lolol what a fag , go bow down to your Roman crucifix and worship the antichrist some more, coward

4
MythArcana 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need to codify a Biden family ban from politics.

4
Johnnyboy2324 4 points ago +4 / -0

😂😂good luck with that

3
Serioush 3 points ago +3 / -0

In before scotus decides Biden in unconstitutionally elected.

3
Keiichi81 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typical Democrat attitude. The SCOTUS and filibuster, etc, are "pillars of our democracy" when they're passing things Democrats want or roadblocking Republicans; then the instant they get in the way of the Democrat agenda, suddenly it all needs to be burned down. A bunch of toddlers throwing temper tantrums, never thinking more than 5 seconds into the future...

Although Lincoln probably isn't the best person to use in this what with the whole "suspending rights" and "ignoring inconvenient Supreme Court rulings". Personally I think Lincoln was a tyrant who grossly overreached his authority and is in large part responsible for the ludicrously-expanded federal government we're dealing with today.

2
MistyFjord 2 points ago +2 / -0

Andrew Jackson gave them middle finger to the SC, when he deported the Indians of Florida. "The court has made its ruling, now let them enforce it!"

2
lupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck lincoln

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
DonttrustChina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, they didn't.

And oh look, they both just got shot one day!

1
YouTubeSucksDicks 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they both got shot....

1
redditadminssuckit [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

my point exactly

1
zipper77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Subtle putting the 3 together.

1
lucifer_fit_deus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I feel like Garfield and McKinley get the short shrift on the list of assassinated presidents.

1
LordCommissarYarrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

FDR took a blowtorch to SCOTUS, he paralyzed them with threats of court packing. Jackson outright ignored it and dared them to enforce their ruling over Indian expulsion

1
Forgotmyname 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden can’t do shit to the Supreme Court.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +2 / -1

JFK was not a good president.

1
Rydanovich 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Abortion rights". Literally have never existed.

Never. Not in any degree, whatsoever.

1
Flipakademsarepedos 1 point ago +1 / -0

That pic of Lincoln is so real!!!!!!!

1
jackneefus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lincoln did take a blowtorch to the Supreme Court. He took military action against separatist states without a court opinion and certainly against the wishes of the original court.

1
Ullyr_Atreides 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kennedy and Lincoln were actually killed because they challenged the influence of international bankers.

1
LordCommissarYarrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kennedy got on the bad side of the CIA and the Mob. Tampa Mob boss Trafficante was partially responsible for the assassination, both Oswald and Ruby had mob connections too, and the Mob cooperated with the CIA in Cuba where kennedy got cold feet.

0
redditadminssuckit [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oy

1
DZP1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats do not believe in rule of law. Unless the law benefits them politically. Then it's okay. This is a child's view of the world. Evene the worst conservative is more mature than that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ProtestantPatriot 1 point ago +4 / -3

The Jesuits killed Lincoln, killed Kennedy, and now here we are again, the servants of the biblical antichrist are once again trying to destabilize our free Protestant nation. WAKE UP PATRIOTS, and QUICK!

-1
MeinDonald -1 points ago +4 / -5

come on guys. Let's not get angry about god's chosen people who push to enslave us...

2
Julius_Severus2 2 points ago +4 / -2

Does anyone not think ProtestantPatriot is a Jew LARPing?

0
ProtestantPatriot 0 points ago +2 / -2

You mean the Roman Empire who’s been striving for world domination since before they crucified the Messiah of Israel?

0
SaddleTramp 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hey, who is Zevi Sabbatai?

What is the oral Torah?

What are mitzvot?

0
ProtestantPatriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Gay

1
LifeInsuranceCapital 1 point ago +2 / -1

Deport the retards who don't know the Communists idolized Lincoln for destroying the rule of law.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Yawnz13 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lincoln supposedly tried to get Roger B. Taney arrrested as retaliation for SCOTUS ruling Lincoln's suspension of habeus corpus as unconstitutional.

-22
deleted -22 points ago +5 / -27