2493
💪🏻—-THIS IS THE WAY!!!—-💪🏻 (media.consumeproduct.win)      YES            
posted ago by BlackPillBot ago by BlackPillBot +2500 / -7
Comments (135)
sorted by:
123
Inquisitor_Corvus 123 points ago +123 / -0

We should have picked our own cotton.

51
80960KA 51 points ago +53 / -2

Imagine if we had industrialized like 50-100 years earlier because we built machines to solve the problems, and on top of that we didn't have a substantial population of the criminal element.

18
randomuser9193 18 points ago +18 / -0

Good points

14
DogFacedPepeSoldier 14 points ago +19 / -5

It would have been the Irish or the Italian or the German immigrants.

Blacks weren't a problem until the socialists wanted to create grievance classes. No reason they couldn't have done the same thing with the Irish, who were catching shit centuries before America.

The issue is that McCarthy was right and we didn't listen.

18
80960KA 18 points ago +18 / -0

It would have been the Irish or the Italian or the German immigrants.

Even Ireland and Germany at their poorest and shittiest (usually directly because of something the British did...) were not as filthy and violent as a "nice" place in Sub-Saharan Africa today. Literally nowhere in Africa has ever done anything approaching the engineering of Germans either, you're equivocating sticks and stones people with watchmaking people.

Blacks weren't a problem until the socialists wanted to create grievance classes.

Coincidentally Jim Crow was ended shortly before that happened.

2
redpillthenormies 2 points ago +4 / -2

Blacks are a problem. Africa has always been a problem. It's not socialism (that's another problem). It's blacks.

0
NotoriousCIC 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yep. Primitive, ignorant and violent.

2
Wind-chasing_luhua 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need to tear a page out of the Bukele playbook.

Or the Bolsanaro playbook.

30
Julia_J 30 points ago +31 / -1

I always wonder how America would have looked like if we always had a 90%+ White population. It would be wonderful. We would probably have bases on Mars by now.

11
the_sky_is_falling 11 points ago +12 / -1

If Scandinavia is any proof, eventually you guys would have imported shithole peoples into your safe communities because you'll developed a "white saviour" complex and were bored from living a safe and content life.

3
Julia_J 3 points ago +3 / -0

The difference is that America is historically a White immigrant nation though and these said immigrants have worked hard in the past and still do in the present. Their children may grow up poor but their grandchildren certainly wouldn't. However, the cycle would keep on being repeated when every year new immigrants from Europe came.

Secondly while America has been White-majority, they still had to deal with lots of social problems (and money problems concerning billions toward welfare, food stamps, programs etcc) concerning black Americans which set us back and we currently also have them with the millions of illegals. If we never had these problems, we would be far ahead. Also, we never had these social problems with recent White immigrants.

Put both points above together, and America would be at least 10x more successful. Do you really think if Chicago (famous for being a Polish enclave) stayed 90% White, it would be as dangerous as it is now? Last weekend alone over 55 people were shot. What about St. Louis, Detroit or NYC? They would still be safe functional cities. Look at Warsaw, Poland 🇵🇱for example.

3
MarvintheRobot 3 points ago +4 / -1

What about a 90% White population and a 0% Jewish population?

2
BidenTaintMyPrez 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't tell me a lot of that was brought on by those dumbasses listening to the "oppressed" here America. I DO think it would be different.

7
turdinthepunch 7 points ago +7 / -0

I would trade every single white liberal for anti communist expats from anywhere on the planet.

7
KekistaniMemeLord 7 points ago +21 / -14

Not sure what the weird circle jerk is on here about "what if we were like all white man? Probably wouldn't have changed jack shit. Take a look at Sweden and the other white countries of Europe to see how that turned out.

19
borntacticool 19 points ago +21 / -2

It would have changed everything. Go look at the completely red map if only White men voted.

4
Julia_J 4 points ago +4 / -0

White women too. Trump won at least 52% of the White woman vote in 2016. I don't know the true numbers for 2020, but I assume it rose greatly, especially since I know several White women, both young and old, who voted for him in 2020 but did not in 2016. Ron DeSantis won a great majority with White women in Florida. If Republicans always had charismatic leaders like him, they would always win both the White man and White woman vote and therfore win msot elections.

4
redpillthenormies 4 points ago +4 / -0

People don't realize that men vote nearly identically to the women of their same race. All this shilling against White women is suspicious. It's non-White men and non-White women who vote blue.

2
GodEmperor2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it's Jew women who overwhelmingly vote democrats. If White people weren't counted together with Jews we'd see that White women are based.

2
redpillthenormies 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same with White women. Painted red if only White women voted.

1
KekistaniMemeLord 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean yea if all those men were self actualized maga men of faith. would of changed everything for every nation of every color of people on earth. Do we exist in that world though?

0
NoFucksman 0 points ago +1 / -1

He just told you, faggot. We would be ultra-conservative and much better off. Don’t try to squirm out of this one.a

1
KekistaniMemeLord 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes and you just like him dont fucking understand that white people nor any group of human beings n this planet are immune to sin and corruption. Why are you such retarted faggots? lol

once again see my example of most of europe britain and the norse countries. being white helped them exactly zilch.

1
GodEmperor2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

White people aren't immune to corruption, but White people would not open the borders to let themselves be replaced in their own country.

No matter if you're a literal communist who loves Karl Marx; you would not push black men with white women in movies, TV shows, and advertisement.

All the problems of America come from a foreign race. The reason most people can't see it is that this foreign race pretends to be White and has practiced mimicry for many centuries so they are hard to spot.

6
Julia_J 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm a White woman, just saying. Also, Sweden is not a good example lol.

I'm Polish and I just say to look at the success of Poland... safest country in Europe, very Catholic and has a good standard of living. Sweden's current problems of diversity are karma revenge for what they did to Poland and Polish people in the past. (Scandinavians have always been left-wing for some reason... they are why Minnesota has been a blue state for several decades).

-1
Handshake2 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Exactly.

2
Patriotedd 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't believe that there would have been a problem with any of the races particularly being the most troublesome, other than the ("native Americans"), if like the commenter said , the socialists never would have created the grievance classes and govt. freebies.

1
learntocode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Going to Mars is a one way death flight.

12
AtlasHug 12 points ago +12 / -0

But but but muh noble savages... They can't help their inferiority, we need to spoon fed them gibs so they don't have to think for themselves.

12
MindlessChaos 12 points ago +12 / -0

Literally were purposely groomed that way. They gave them bad land and said if you go off the reservation then you will cause a war. So the govt took away their ability to feed themselves to make them reliant on the govt for further control... sound familiar?

5
logan34 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or build a machine that did. Wait we did.

3
keepamericagreat102 3 points ago +3 / -0

and we should never hite illegals. thats the next wave if cotton pickers, figuratively speaking.

55
FarmerHuck 55 points ago +56 / -1

I'm half Native American, I grew up on the Nez Perce Reservation. And I place the emphasis on American far above the "Native" part. I fucking LOVE America, and anybody who lives here who thinks otherwise can enjoy my size 11's kicking them in the ass on their way out the door. I don't give a shit about Europe, or their "culture", seeing as it's a failed continent full of garbage human beings. I care about AMERICAN culture. And I'm fucking glad as hell I don't sleep in a tee pee (except when I camp), and I'm sure as fuck happy I don't have to shit in some hole.

11
Visolatte 11 points ago +11 / -0

Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca was one of the first Europeans that set foot (actually shipwrecked) in what is now Texas in 1528. All but 4 of his party perished that winter, and those four were enslaved by Indians (along with natives of other tribes) for more than four years before they could escape. He witnessed what North American Indian life was really about - little shelter, constantly grubbing for food, near starvation, intertribal warfare and slavery. Surprisingly, he did not hold his ill treatment against them later - a devout Christian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81lvar_N%C3%BA%C3%B1ez_Cabeza_de_Vaca (yea i know wiki link but it is pretty accurate).

If you get a chance read his book - it is an amazing story.

4
ceremony_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well I'm Indian American.

And I can tell you I put my emphasis on the "American" part.

There's a reason why my parents were able to come here, work hard, and save.

No looking back.

0
Julia_J 0 points ago +5 / -5

Europe is not a failed continent... Western culture is European culture just like it's also America"s culture. If Europe is a failure then what the hell is Asia or South America then? Or God forbid Africa?

9
FreedomFromGovt 9 points ago +10 / -1

If it's not a failed continent, why is it trying desperately to commit suicide by demographic replacement??

6
borntacticool 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah it's so failed everyone wants to move there, just like the USA. Success brings parasitism.

5
FreedomFromGovt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, when your government is cashing in its wealth, its women and its own culture to pander to your replacements, the invaders'd be stupid not to take advantage of all the free lucre, land, and rapable infidel pussy they can possibly want.

3
redpillthenormies 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jews.

3
Vadernocturnus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Globalists breh. The common denominator to most developed countries problems.

2
GodEmperor2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The demographics of the US are much worse than the demographics of the worst European country.

2
FreedomFromGovt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem with Europe, though, is that it's never had a longstanding tradition of jarringly multicultural immigration, nor a history of constitutionalism with inherent and inviolable human rights. Large swaths of Europe were under the thumbs of autocratic and repressive monarchs. The waves of liberal revolutionism across Europe throughout the 19th C. demonstrate that fact. Therefore, Europeans don't know what to do about multicultural tensions today except for atavistic and draconian clamp downs on their own citizenry.

In the US, the reason multiculturalism has worked is because we have had, since our founding, the most magnificent written constitution of government that the best minds of the Enlightenment could craft, along with a bill of rights that established the citizenry as the unquestioned bulwark against tyranny. We never had to form secret societies and furtively foment insurrections from stews and alleyways. Our right to bear arms functions as a double-edged sword of deterrence--not only against a wayward government, but also against unpredictable compatriots, as well.

We've also had a very strong reverence for our absolute freedom of speech, in which people have been free to voice their attitudes, positive or negative. Now that the tech giants have seen fit, in collusion with the government, to stifle free speech, we've begun to see a lot more overt hostility and acts of interracial and cultural violence. It proves that depriving a citizenry of their right to criticize doesn't make the culture stronger, harmonious, or more tolerant. All it does is lock the lid on the pressure cooker and turn up the heat.

Historically, we also had a very robust manufacturing sector whose factories took the world's benighted peasantry and turned them into middle class citizens through the mechanism of a paycheck. Even unskilled workers could begin to plan for brighter futures for their children. European factories never had, or needed, a steady source of foreign labor that they were responsible for acculturating. Therefore, they had no mechanism for it. You're seeing the results of that right now: a bifurcated society with indigestible and extremely volatile demographic blobs. And the only reason you think it works is because censorship and socialism is keeping you silent and anesthetized.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FreedomFromGovt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at the waves of revolutionism since 1789: 1815, 1821, 1830, 1848, 1878, 1890, 1905, and 1917. The secret societies were hounded by cadres of monarchical spies, informants, and secret police. Those menaces weren't the product of a benevolent elite looking to lay a cornucopia of liberalism at the feet of their thralls.

If you can wave away repression, censorship and political imprisonment, and if you can support monarchism in any capacity other than as a quaint tourist attraction, perhaps you're the ones with the problem. Debates about the merits of autocracy versus communism are akin to arguing about Scylla versus Charybdis: they both devour you in the end.

It doesn't matter to me because I find you all to be contrarian and tiresome...a pox on all your houses! I certainly won't argue in support of any ideological scourge Europe next inflicts on the world: Feudalism, Absolutism, Nation-statism, French Mobocracy, Communism, Fascism, Environmentalism, Globalism, or some other destructive '-ism'. I think Europe hit its apex with the Enlightenment and it's all been downhill since then.

I think, though, if you've actually decided to die on this particular hill, you should at least be honest--for once in your mendacious and duplicitous lives. Just be honest, and stop arguing in support of retrograde idiocy like Kaiser Wilhelm. Are you seriously willing to die to promote a triumvirate of inbred Victorian cousins whose calamitous machinations (see: 'The Willy-Nicky Telegrams') led to the deaths of 25 million people in WWI??

And, just be forthright: stop being politique. Stop obliquely beating around the bush; say it with conviction: "we're sick of Jews and we want our countries back!" However, once you've determined your aims though, don't bother with killing because it just gives them a claim against your descendants. Network like your lives depend on it and do not let them anywhere near your financial institutions ever again.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
1
Dessert_Eagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

EuroPride. Any questions?

1
Ch3f4554551n 1 point ago +2 / -1

Western Europe still supports monarchies....it is in NO WAY represented by the Deist Republic.

41
OneBigMaga 41 points ago +41 / -0

I used to dream about living in the old west, then I bought a house that had a bug problem. Changed my mind real quick. I like a nice airtight house with screens on the windows and working a/c.

27
coolhandcuke 27 points ago +27 / -0

I used to think it might be cool to be a pioneer exploring the frontier way back when. Then I read about the grasshopper plague in a "Little House" book. No thanks.

15
TeeBP 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah, I'd rather stick to camping out every now and then lol

3
canttouchdis 3 points ago +6 / -3

yea

Field West isn't like what you see in the movies lol. immaculate movie stars prancing around town to town shooting whoever they like

you'll most likely get eaten by Coyotes and if you get a cut on your leg it will in fact get infected and u will fucking die. have fun without any antibiotics

31
RATMW 31 points ago +31 / -0

400,000 slaves were transported to America. Now there’s 50,000,000 blacks. That’s a higher growth rate than anywhere in the world. Even higher growth than Africa.

12,000,000 slaves were transported to the Ottoman Muslim empire. But there’s no black people there today. Because slaves had their balls cut off, and the babies of black women were clubbed when born.

They were treated more fairly by Europeans than any other people.

7
Julia_J 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think the growth rate advanced because they mixed with lots of Whites. That's why modern African Americans have lighter brown skin than the blacks in Africa.

The Ottomans (along with other Asians and/or muslims like Mongols, Tartars etc) enslaved millions of White Europeans too.

6
Honkdozer 6 points ago +6 / -0

I heard in Turkey they started boycotting ancestry/dna testing as the tests showed a lot of them had more or all Greek/Roman blood instead of Turkic, which they didn't like.

No surprises there considering they conquered those areas and enslaved the locals.

I bet here in the US most minorities would come back as mixed race in dna tests, like you said.

4
redpillthenormies 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagined getting moved from a mud elephant poop hut to a nice cabin with a chimney, and then complaining that White people bad.

3
ceremony_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

What happened was just fucking cruel.

Yes, I too am aware of the horrors done to the negro slaves in the Arabic world.

21
Sylvester1212 21 points ago +24 / -3

I'd like Matt a bit more if he'd leave Israel First Benny and stop denying Trump and America First are the future of the Republican Party.

16
Gadsden 16 points ago +17 / -1

He absolutely said America first is the future. He also said that the movement is bigger than trump, which it is.

So you think that, God forbid, should trump decide not to run, we simply give up and just join the communists?

No?

Then you agree with Matt.

4
Sylvester1212 4 points ago +5 / -1

He has openly said Trump had nothing to do with Trump endorsed candidates winning. How can he be America First when he works for and enriches an Israel First company?

3
80960KA 3 points ago +5 / -2

He has openly said Trump had nothing to do with Trump endorsed candidates winning.

Trump won largely because he was pushing sane policies with his MAGA platform, and was bluntly saying things that a lot of people were thinking already. MAGA is the evolution of the Tea Party, it would exist with or without Trump. Trump just channeled what was already there.

How can he be America First when he works for and enriches an Israel First company?

I mean they took over our media for subversion...

As long as he's not saying subversive shit, which he doesn't seem to these days, I'm fine with him using Lil Ben's channel.

1
canttouchdis 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't know what you're talking about. and without seeing it myself I can't say what he probably meant. but all of his takes are very based

he actually stands for something beyond just partisan allegiance to a party or a man

so again I don't know what he means about Trump but it seems more that he just wants things to happen and he doesn't care if it's from Trump or anybody else. he just wants it to happen..

which is the right take. if your entire life revolves around Trump alone and nothing else then you're not really mega. because what's going to happen when Trump's gone?

8
Legionnaire0311 8 points ago +9 / -1

Agreed. His association with The Daily Wire More Money To Israel is his downfall. I agree with most of his takes otherwise.

7
OrangeElvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree, but don't follow him enough to have a good understanding of his take. Is it an issue of jealousy? He seems the type that would get butt hurt if someone like Trump bitch slapped him.

3
canttouchdis 3 points ago +5 / -2

judging from his tweets I think Matt Walsh's biggest problem with Trump isn't trump.. he seems to be criticizing that Patriots have basically made their entire identities revolving around a single man. he criticizes that a lot of people are worshiping Trump instead of pushing for the movement itself..

you can't have a movement revolving around a single man you have to have the movement able to stand on its own and that single man can be part of the movement..

especially when the guy is like 75 years old. like how much longer do you think he's gonna be around?

if you need to think long term and you do then it can't revolve specifically around trump. the man's not even going to be able to walk on his own within 10 years

so I agree with that on that take. the movement needs to revolve around the movement. not around trump. Trump can be a big part of the movement. he can even be the leader of the movement. but the movement needs to be bigger than trump. it cannot be solely about Trump and for a lot of people I agree that I see that it's mostly about Trump and not really about populism or maga..

I see people spending more time talking about "Trump won" then "biden lost"

they're talking more about Trump and his accomplishments than they are about Biden and his failures.. I don't know if that's what Matt Walsh meant but based on his tweets it seems to be something along those lines and I kind of agree with thatt

3
MAGAMoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

He basically believes that no one older then retirement age should be running the country. He is not anti Trump but he is no fanboy either.

2
ceremony_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

The thing is that until Trump, there was absolutely no "Republican" willing to stand up for Patriots. Every Republican in power, or even considered for Presidency, was a dyed-in-the-wool party hack.

Not only did Trump stand up to Democrats, but also his own party.

And then Trump stood up to the media - which every politician dreads and fears.

And Trump stood up to the world - with his NATO, and his approach towards Europe, and China.

I agree with everything you said.

But here's my question: As of right now, today - who would be able to replace Trump and stand up like he did? DeSantis? Anyone else?

1
Everquest4Life 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is spot on. Trump is the man who stood up to all America's foes, foreign and especially domestic. He shined a light on all the corruption that's plagued the country for 100+ years and has accelerated very rapidly in the past 60 and now warp speed since 2001.

No one can replace Trump. I see a very bright future for DeSantis, but he is still not ready to be the kind of major player on the world stage like Trump. The ability to throw the full weight and power of America around like Trump did was masterful. Imagine if he hadn't been stopped by commies, RINOs, and the media every single step of the way?

Trump earned our adoration. We don't blindly hero worship. DeSantis is smart. He knows this. He is watching and learning. He will be ready in 2028.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trap woke people up and disrupted the swamp. Our being awake is the key. Election fraud and deep state need to be dismantled.

20
Zippythekid 20 points ago +21 / -1

And to add, had it not been the Europeans it would have been the Asians. And the Asians would have almost definitely slaughtered every last one of the indigenous people. They wouldn’t have tried to work with them. No indigenous culture would have survived into modern day, they all would have been conquered one way or another. The only way they would have survived is if societies never advanced. If that was the case we would still be in caves dragging woman around by their hair.

7
Sylvester1212 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pretty sure the Asians like earlier Europeans had already been here long before Columbus.

6
Zepp87 6 points ago +6 / -0

On the west side? Especially northern, absolutely.

18
AbsurdOpinion 18 points ago +18 / -0

Fun Fact: In the 18th century there was a movement to offer African Americans passage back to their native lands. None of them wanted to go. I guess they knew even back then that they were better off in a western culture than their own.

6
canttouchdis 6 points ago +7 / -1

just think about that.. even then America was so great that black people would rather live in segregated America then desegregated Africa

1
Honkdozer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Africa was even worse back then lol

1
Rope_Tree_Journalist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think Africa has changed since then. Or ever.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
GodEmperor2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a repatriation movement even in the 20th century, led by Marcus Garvey. But the NAACP and its Jewish handlers destroyed him because the Jews wanted to use blacks as a weapon against White people (they converted lots of them to communism).

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Lincoln wanted to send them back.

3
Dirkstruan313 3 points ago +4 / -1

Can you imagine how wonderful everything would be if he had been successful

12
TheSphinxIsAFag 12 points ago +12 / -0

How the fuck do you xerox a screenshot?

12
BlackPillBot [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

It’s not much but it’s honest work.

10
Thejudge6060 10 points ago +10 / -0

I used to despise Matt Walsh. But in the last 2 years I've realized this man is incredibly based.

7
BlackPillBot [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

The enemy of good is perfect. I tend to like most of his takes.

4
Thejudge6060 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah. I've always viewed him as being in the same side as me, but as being the weird dude on the team. Lately he seems to be the star running back and it's changed my opinion

6
80960KA 6 points ago +6 / -0

He seems to have gotten more based or started to show more of his true power level in the last couple years. Before that he was like a slightly edgy neocon persona.

10
45fan 10 points ago +10 / -0

Aztecs we're enslaving peripheral tribes and sacrificing their children. Those tribes couldn't wait to join up with the Spaniards.

6
80960KA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Same with the American colonists and many tribes of CONUS injuns, many were willing allies.

Really aside from the novel old world diseases causing plagues (which also happened to Europeans) I don't think it worked out terribly for the injuns despite some of the usual historical atrocities. They got land carve outs, some of them have become extremely prosperous because of it, and there's more of their genetics existing now than ever before, or ever would if they had stayed at hunter gatherer population levels. The mutualistic relationship is often helpful, and I'm willing to bet a lot of the tribes on the east coast that have huge casinos, are very similar people to the ones that allied with the colonists. I'd also wager tribes that are poor are more likely to be the ones that were often at war with their neighbors and fought tooth and nail against the colonists.

9
Captain_MAGA 9 points ago +9 / -0

The left loves talking about immigrants until you talk about the european migration.

9
Goldsteinbergsky 9 points ago +9 / -0

But that's when they stop using "immigrant" and start using their "colonizer" hate slur.

2
GodEmperor2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also love to talk about "indigenous" but not about the White European people being the legitimate owners of Europe.

0
SaddleTramp 0 points ago +1 / -1

The right loves talking about conquest and superior tactics until you mention the Judaic conquest over most of Western culture.

6
CovfefeNegro 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm on the Texas Gulf Coast, indigenous peoples here included cannibals and slavers. One of the dominant peoples were the Karankawas, they learned to make and use long bows and were nomadic warriors.

https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/karankawa-indians

As nomads what claim could they have upon Muh Texas? I'm a native Texan too, and I've never engaged in slavery or ceremonial cannibalism, how is it possible that my culture is not more acceptable than that of the cannibals and slavers?

Most of the Karankawas were caught by Darwin for 'reasons', sorrynotsorry.

https://files.catbox.moe/irurwm.jpg

4
80960KA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do wonder what the indigenous cultures would have looked like given a thousand more years. The Maya types while still bloodthirsty were pretty sophisticated despite their lack of local mineral resources keeping them in the stone age. If they had remigrated northward and conquered the less developed hunter-gatherers, the resources of CONUS and the pressure of winter might have helped them develop further into a steel age culture.

This is of course a video game/simulation scenario, not reality. If the Europeans hadn't made contact in that 1000 years, someone else probably would.

4
CovfefeNegro 4 points ago +4 / -0

A friend of mine is hispanic, his Mama is a native from a tribe I can't pronounce. He says they were slaves to the Azteks, so to them Spaniards when they came were actually perceived as a lesser Master.

Human history is really War, condensed down enough simply war. In your example the Mayans would need, yep, war to thrive.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you look at the origin of much of our modern tech there's a lot of war involved. Computers, telecommunications, etc.

4
_Sully_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

They know this. They’re complaining is a tactic to justify taking it from us. Everything about the left is psychological attacks to rip apart the fabric of a society so they can steal the country.

4
mrmrmrj 4 points ago +4 / -0

I cannot find this tweet.

2
DoozerChuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was here looking for a link

Guess it's bs

Thx

3
Visceroth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saving this for Columbus Day too

3
D3PL0R4BL3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. Communists who grew up in fucking suburbs. The lowest white trash there is.

3
GodSaveTheWest 3 points ago +3 / -0

true, they only dream about the world they think those primitives would have created. They imagine Wakanda.

The reality is that they didnt advance for thousands of years and likely would not have advanced in the 300 years after that either. Would have been conquered by invading south americans, using european technology, instead.

1
canttouchdis 1 point ago +3 / -2

even south Americans wouldn't have advanced much.

the funny thing about imagining wakanda is the idea that for wakanda to exist they had to implement a Sci-Fi magic material just growing there for them to take advantage of..

and even then if you really analyze it their economy couldn't possibly have worked.. in order for industrialization of that magnitude to work you need international Free trade. you need global free trade. you need to be importing materials from all over the world and manufacturing them in different places and factories etc. but this black supremacist notion that some tiny little tribe of African black people can do all the things that the rest of the world struggled to do and do it all by themselves is fucking stupid.. you're telling me they had all the materials they needed right under their feet? the copper of the lithium iron ore rubber etc? this tiny little fucking nation of like what? 100,000 people? they had enough of a massive workforce to create these vast fucking cities and shit? where did they manufacture the airplanes? what factory did they have for that? where did they manufacture the cars and the weapons? even the United States didn'tt manufacture its own fucking weapons it outsources it to China

your society was a complete fucking sci-fi made up bullshit to make black people feel Superior like "look! you're superior to the white man! look what you could do if not for the evil White man!""

like yea. that's why for thousands and thousands of years Africa didn't advancc at all and by the time the europeans showed up they were still living in fucking tribes wearing loincloths

3
steve_jerbs 3 points ago +3 / -0

The west is the best.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
jctbg20 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Latinos" wouldn't exist without the Conquistadors

2
MsAnthropic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes!! I feel exactly the same about Australia, indigenous people in Australia were literally still in the Stone Age. No wheel, no written language, couldn’t boil water.

2
VirtueVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

The liberal women who idolize primitive cultures treat Native Americans like babies. The reason why so much military equipment is named after Native American tribes or things is because they were fierce warriors. I'd be pissed about the feminization of Native Americans if I was one.

1
VexusMinister 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not just feminization. Infantilization.

2
iideathyii 2 points ago +2 / -0

matt is a pro israel pos grifter like loomer

1
BlackPillBot [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I’ve heard this before. I still enjoy some of his hot takes.

2
sir_rockness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn. I like this...

1
redpillthenormies 1 point ago +2 / -1

Coming to this continent to make it a White country was amazing. No apologies. It's a better, safer place now.

1
Ullyr_Atreides 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would be happy to live in the primitive cultures. However I'm not bitching about America or trashing our accomplishments.

1
sk39999999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um you let psychopaths conquer the whole planet clown. That's not something to be proud of. We're on the verge of extinction now with the collapse of the global economy/food supply and everyone forced into lethal injections and forced lockdowns - soon to be the mark of the beast chip.

1
k_the_c 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like he's channeling Colonel Nathan R. Jessup.

1
Pax11B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen

1
cptKloss2 1 point ago +1 / -0

you know it's right there in the Declaration of Independence: "endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions"

1
zillat 1 point ago +1 / -0

What he said!

1
GoldwaterVoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, we can't have inter-tribal slavery and FGM anymore ???

1
DarkPepe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's right, ya know.

1
krepoisbest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Matt 10/10 as always

1
slim2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said something similar to someone complaining about cultural appropriation. You are complaining about white people using Facebook, using a computer or phone, using electricity. I’ll stop when you stop.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

This fucker is a second generation immigrant lol. Look at his last name

1
kaczan3 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm glad he said "MEN who provided it to you". Too often I hear the "men and women" bs.